boilers have to be inspected and tested on a yearly basis to receive insurance to operate. you also have to have whats called a steam ticket to run it.
i have bean looking on youtube for a VERY long time and i cant EVER find a video this cool... im speachless.. this is the COOLEST VIDEO ON YOUTUBE!!!!! my hat is off to you...
For Ref. This type of steam engine would probably have a thermal efficiency of less than 10%, a multiple expansion steam engine around 25%,a modern steam power station 40 to 50% (but don't forget you've got transmission losses and have to consider the efficiency of an electic motor do drive anything.
A modern petrol engine is around 30% eff. and the latest diesel ship engines are over 50% eff.
@doubleboost Close, but no cigar! At half stroke when stationary maximum torque is being produced, but no power. Bhp is a product of torque & revs. So, for example, a steam loco can exert 100,000 ft/lbs of torque on its driving wheels to start a 1000 ton train on the move, but until those big old driving wheels start revolving, however slowly, not a single bhp is being produced. So 10,514 ft/lbs @ 50 rpm = 100 bhp. So does 105 ft/lbs @ 5000 rpm, or 52.5 ft/lbs @ 10,000 rpm.
Thats nothing, look up wesley glynns big mclaren traction engine pulling at rossdillig rally near borris. co carlow on youtube and you will see what steam engines traactor pulling is all about
@b00rk yeah thats why you dont stick your hand in there union reppy thats one reason why we lost our power in this country pussys looking out for retards who dont even deserve to be working on stuff like this. am i right???
Steam power should be reconsidered in some applications. They are most efficient at high temperatures. Petrol and diesel motors need to be cooled, which implies a waste of energy, hence inefficiency.
if you had them running on hho....could have powered the world and never even herd of a gas engine or global warming or none of that nonsense ...this is a wondering vid
And this is only a single cylinder engine that has only flywheel inertia to carry the piston over the dead centres! Just think what a big twin cylinder compound could pull.
Back in the day when alot of trains used wood as fuel. That's far less polution then a car engine. Think a study was done about 10 years ago saying a steam engine train put out the same amount of polution as a 4 cycle weed trimmer.
Steam is probably more efficient if you look at the truth that steam engines run on crude fuel, and otto cycle engines need refined fuel to run, which if the energy used to make the gasoline is factored in, otto cycle engines pale in comparison to rankine cycle machines. Jus' sayin'.
Watching this again, I missed it last time, Holy crap, look at the size of the fly wheel on that one! I mean, steamers have nice bit fly wheels, but that one is a tall skinny one rather than a short fat one....
FULL PULL!!! Now that is some serious torque. @polybun Couldn't have put it better myself. One of the worlds most efficient engines, if not THE most is the triple expansion engine fitted to the Waverley paddle steamer. Recorded at over 50%.
No matter how far technology goes... damn I just love steam machines. They are so complex and powerfull. If we only had some other kind of fuel to make steam...
One of the great advantages of a steam engine is that it does not "stall" like a diesel or a gasoline engine (meaning, it does not turn off when stopped). The steam is still applying pressure to the piston even if the weight is too great for the power given: the engine is still "on."
The disadvantages, of course, are the weight, the inefficiency of the machine, the fact that it has to get up to steam to operate (same problem that plagued the Stanley Steamer). But still a simple machine.
What inefficiency? They actually do a pretty damn good job thermodynamically. Far better than any internal combustion engine will ever do. They aren't simple machines either, far from it, in many ways far more complex than an internal combustion engine. Deceptively simple maybe. Ok so it's only steam, but you have variable valve timing, exaughst use to increase air intake, then you have to consider, just how do you shove water into a pressure vessle at 100psi?
@Polybun Either way, it's a damned feat of engineering using steam from a locomotive boiler at 280 psi to force water back into itself at a higher pressure, a wonder of the industrial world. Although we have a few problems with injectors on the locos, it's usually a "tap it wi' t'hammer" type of job, haha.
@kez259 eh, not really. I mean, water is nearly non compressible, so it's only a matter of a good seal at that point, and graphite packing will more than hold a few hundred psi. Amazing is the sp&s 700's feed water pump, that runs off of waste steam from the cylinders. Mind you, it's a big fucking pump.
Well, it's multiple things at work. First steam hits the cold feed water and is turned into water, creating a strong vacume. Because of a check valve, the water is then drawn into the injector. But the stream still has great velocity, so it then forces the water through another check valve, that rams it into the boiler. It uses a good deal of steam to run an injector, but, a small amount of water makes a large amount of steam. The water is also preheated by the steam.
@Polybun Not to shoot you down (I love steam engines), but steam piston engines have somewhere around 6% thermal efficiency, whereas a typical gas engine had around 12%, and a diesel around 27%. Consult this video for more information if you please:/watch?v=GMdLbPS9R20&feature=channel.
@mwhite112393 Have any proof of that? I don't think you are that close, and really it depends on the boiler. The engines themselves do really well. If it wasn't very effecient, power plants wouldn't use it.
@Polybun Well, last I checked, Plants use turbines. I posted a video link to a documentary about it all. It lists the efficiencies of all pre-gasoline engines a ways into the video.
Steam engines have about 4% efficiency, internal combustion engines range from 18% to 40% depending on factors such as petrol or diesel etc. To claim that an external combustion steam engine like this is good thermodynamically from the burning of solid fuel to turning the wheels, is inaccurate.
However steam engines such as these are much more fun and exciting, but NOT efficient.
@peterfarrow But they are some of the most powerful fuckers as well lol I think if the steam engine was revisited and redone I think it would out do diesel anyday
@Polybun agreed...its still viable and people are starting to take notice of steam again...hand pumps can push water under heavy psi, some hydraulic hand pumps for hydrostatic tests can go to 10 000 psi no probs...
Cool video. have pulled a couple times with Case steam engines. you can tell the sled operator feathered it for this small engine. it would have powered out at the begining about the time it sounded liek it was going to, then he opened hte throttle because there wasnt alot of load on so he was able to keep going. :)
Met a lovely lady at the GDSF yesterday. A Marshall Roller, the guy running her caressed her with the occasional wipe of an oily rag (well a lady is entitled to wear a bit of lippy if she's on a day out). Otherwise she was just as she was, plain wonderful.
that thing needs a lot of tlc to look like it did bake in the hay day (sorry if i used the word when i put hay day)
purcellm100 1 month ago
that was cool as heck. thanks...
marksalot2116 2 months ago
I hope they test those boilers. That thing looks old!
mhoyer01 2 months ago
@mhoyer01
boilers have to be inspected and tested on a yearly basis to receive insurance to operate. you also have to have whats called a steam ticket to run it.
Speediet44 2 months ago
But for shear torque?
Well? you get the picture.
FireDropTechnologies 3 months ago
Thank you, I am a true fan of anything connected with live steam !
dook2u1 3 months ago
TREVOR THE TRACTION ENGINE is very strong even though he's old
Killerkiiwii369 4 months ago
That is a thing of beauty.
squirtjosie7 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
close to the end I couldn't help but remember that old story.....The Little Engine That Could....lol...
savagenomore 5 months ago
Comment removed
savagenomore 5 months ago
shame it didn't go chooooo choooo at the end
wuerp 6 months ago
@wuerp LOL!!
keeganv 5 months ago
We used to have a steam engine, it was a 6 inch gauge borrow, it pulled over 46 tons!!!!!!!!
trainman665 6 months ago
i have bean looking on youtube for a VERY long time and i cant EVER find a video this cool... im speachless.. this is the COOLEST VIDEO ON YOUTUBE!!!!! my hat is off to you...
farmallfarmall
FARMALLfarmall 6 months ago
a torque monster ,love it
badslabber 6 months ago
For Ref. This type of steam engine would probably have a thermal efficiency of less than 10%, a multiple expansion steam engine around 25%,a modern steam power station 40 to 50% (but don't forget you've got transmission losses and have to consider the efficiency of an electic motor do drive anything.
A modern petrol engine is around 30% eff. and the latest diesel ship engines are over 50% eff.
GSmr666 6 months ago
Nice Boiler steering !!
mr2jags 7 months ago
That was so freaking awesome!
spillz09 7 months ago
Very cool putting the heat to it like that. Hat's off to you
Weldernils 7 months ago
Pure torque
Max power 0 rpm at half stroke
doubleboost 8 months ago
@doubleboost Close, but no cigar! At half stroke when stationary maximum torque is being produced, but no power. Bhp is a product of torque & revs. So, for example, a steam loco can exert 100,000 ft/lbs of torque on its driving wheels to start a 1000 ton train on the move, but until those big old driving wheels start revolving, however slowly, not a single bhp is being produced. So 10,514 ft/lbs @ 50 rpm = 100 bhp. So does 105 ft/lbs @ 5000 rpm, or 52.5 ft/lbs @ 10,000 rpm.
hiyadroogs 5 months ago
Thats nothing, look up wesley glynns big mclaren traction engine pulling at rossdillig rally near borris. co carlow on youtube and you will see what steam engines traactor pulling is all about
thecelticsteamer 8 months ago
Steam engines show everybody the true meaning of torque.
cuautlajal 8 months ago
that fast rotating wheel looks pretty dangerous..
b00rk 8 months ago
@b00rk yeah thats why you dont stick your hand in there union reppy thats one reason why we lost our power in this country pussys looking out for retards who dont even deserve to be working on stuff like this. am i right???
gunny426plymouth 8 months ago 3
Steam power should be reconsidered in some applications. They are most efficient at high temperatures. Petrol and diesel motors need to be cooled, which implies a waste of energy, hence inefficiency.
eddie100 9 months ago
DOMINATING
blibbax 9 months ago
Steam Engine so strong!!!!!
TheHanluo 9 months ago
steam is very powerful!!!
akinorhan5 9 months ago
nice video
RoobinXIII 9 months ago
Nice vid
HalleWestfalenKanal 9 months ago
I ride this mathaaafukin beat like a tractorr
beattronix 9 months ago
Right on man!!!! Now thats a tractor!
DrFrankensteam 10 months ago
if you had them running on hho....could have powered the world and never even herd of a gas engine or global warming or none of that nonsense ...this is a wondering vid
spark23ca 10 months ago
Wow. I was not expecting that. Awesome piece of machinery.
pv2xeek 10 months ago
How much torque in that?
DanielRemains 11 months ago
ha ha cool quietest tractor pull in history
ncktbs 11 months ago
Steam engines are at their most powerful when they're stalled, they're like electrics.
jrkepler 11 months ago
Run out of track !??
Ginrai89 11 months ago
Nothing will stop it besides blowing up, flippin backwards or the wheels start spinnin it the dirt digging a deep rut in the ground.
fireburst102 11 months ago
over 100 years old as well!!
scott4fliss 11 months ago
That thing would blow up before you could stop it.
JJINCWorldWide 11 months ago
ol girl didnt even struggle!! pure power
bulldog32220 11 months ago
Often just 20 HP at the crankshaft. Will pull a house down.
Steam injectors can feed this baby no problem at 100 PSI...I think I like the Penberthy better than others. Pretty efficient.
wqpeb 1 year ago
now there is a tractor.
midgetcogger 1 year ago
Called traction engines for a reason ;) gerron!! I actually saw you guys do that pull..
FatKidOnA250 1 year ago
Torque wins races - power sells engines.
Gotta love steam.
TK42138 1 year ago
whats it pulling??
brother776 1 year ago
what a grunty mother fucker!!
spoonnz 1 year ago
Great !!!!
pigrep 1 year ago
A great effort,....
ozzirt 1 year ago
That's some mean dang pulling---steam tractors are tough!
micmoable 1 year ago
that was amazing.
Fireheart528 1 year ago
And this is only a single cylinder engine that has only flywheel inertia to carry the piston over the dead centres! Just think what a big twin cylinder compound could pull.
hiyadroogs 1 year ago
to think, when it comes down to it, all thats doing that is steam filling an area thats only a few inches by a few inches
power
andyg3 1 year ago
and that,s what you call power . beet that with just water and fire
flash51050 1 year ago
That was absolutely great. What a magestic machine. Thanks for posting!
sandman19681012 1 year ago
rat rod =)
usimakithomasjohn 1 year ago
Back in the day when alot of trains used wood as fuel. That's far less polution then a car engine. Think a study was done about 10 years ago saying a steam engine train put out the same amount of polution as a 4 cycle weed trimmer.
Justy330 1 year ago
@Justy330 true!! wood actually releases stored co2 into the atmosphere when burned actually helps the planet!
and it totally renewable...
porpoisefathom 1 year ago
Steam is probably more efficient if you look at the truth that steam engines run on crude fuel, and otto cycle engines need refined fuel to run, which if the energy used to make the gasoline is factored in, otto cycle engines pale in comparison to rankine cycle machines. Jus' sayin'.
TheCopterDr 1 year ago
impressive.....
dirtTdude 1 year ago
u can only trust steam! steam rules and they always will!
123wazzy 1 year ago
well that is amazing, screw gasoline, this and the stanley steamcars have made me choose to do a major motorswap in my blown up motorcycle.
pissedatpez 1 year ago
That wait was far to light for it! theses things could carry 2 of them up hill and make it look easy!
ashleybob3 1 year ago
What people dont think of is we all use and need steam today. not much has changed. even a nuke plant is steam powered.
windandsun68 1 year ago
at first shes like "UGH haven't had to pull something like this in a while" CHUG chug chug...
forresthop 1 year ago
beast!! slow, not completely steady, but impressive non the less
frackcha 1 year ago
id love to have that and skid logs with it.
NathansBackwoods 1 year ago
very cool
hvguy 1 year ago
Watching this again, I missed it last time, Holy crap, look at the size of the fly wheel on that one! I mean, steamers have nice bit fly wheels, but that one is a tall skinny one rather than a short fat one....
Polybun 1 year ago
That's amazing!!!
HugeJasFilms 1 year ago
So how'd she do, compared with the rest of the field? I hope it whupped 'em all real good!
Shipwright1918 1 year ago
very strong
thanks for share
CBMXX 1 year ago
Did he win?
harpo103 1 year ago
Yup.
Anarchemitis 1 year ago
Steam over "infernal corruption" engines any day! That was enjoyable.
Johnny11149 1 year ago
How could you be proud, taking an engine in that state to a rally!?
skateboard4zero 1 year ago
chaga chaga chaga chaga
ssbbman12343 1 year ago
FULL PULL!!! Now that is some serious torque. @polybun Couldn't have put it better myself. One of the worlds most efficient engines, if not THE most is the triple expansion engine fitted to the Waverley paddle steamer. Recorded at over 50%.
quatfro 1 year ago
She doesn't belch out as much smoke as some of the tractor pullers either!
DambustersSquad617 1 year ago
WOW! This is like a Timex watch...as John Cameron Swayze would say," Timex, It takes a lick'n and keeps on tick'n!"
1foxtrot70 1 year ago
pure power thess old tractors are super strong
bulldog32220 1 year ago
Put a wheelie bar on the back, then It would have gone right through the trees.
NathansBackwoods 1 year ago
very beautiful engine
derneuschooer 1 year ago
What a great enine.
rayunseitig 1 year ago
COAL AND WATER SO SIMPLE?
scott4fliss 1 year ago
Hmm if they do that with steam tech from 80 years ago... what wouldn´t we do today?
NollieFlipX 1 year ago
No matter how far technology goes... damn I just love steam machines. They are so complex and powerfull. If we only had some other kind of fuel to make steam...
NollieFlipX 1 year ago
That's all torque baby!! Nothing beats steam!!
pik0 1 year ago 35
@pik0 from 1900's!
RRboyLEGOboy 6 months ago
that thing looks ugly but has a lot of power
markstiev 2 years ago 3
that thing can haul ass!!!!
ROCKSOLID19 2 years ago
Mclaren Traction engine 1896 i think. It could probably pull even better if the saftey valves were lifting.
Mclaren1O 2 years ago
Nice pull. The old engine have a lot of power!
Bidone1967 2 years ago
Im from america, but all steam tractors are cool, id take thet one in a heartbeat.
NathansBackwoods 2 years ago
Pure power
NathansBackwoods 2 years ago
anyone want to guess the last time that boiler saw hydro?
Polybun 2 years ago
Sadly you can't tell that from looking at it.
hollywood1340 1 year ago
One of the great advantages of a steam engine is that it does not "stall" like a diesel or a gasoline engine (meaning, it does not turn off when stopped). The steam is still applying pressure to the piston even if the weight is too great for the power given: the engine is still "on."
The disadvantages, of course, are the weight, the inefficiency of the machine, the fact that it has to get up to steam to operate (same problem that plagued the Stanley Steamer). But still a simple machine.
ftorresgamez 2 years ago
Maximum torque is produced at zero revs,
wisheywashey 2 years ago 2
What inefficiency? They actually do a pretty damn good job thermodynamically. Far better than any internal combustion engine will ever do.
Polybun 1 year ago
@ftorresgamez these are beautiful machines but well technology moves on..... you can't love a tractor, same with a train or a jet plane.
ROCKSOLID19 2 years ago 2
What inefficiency? They actually do a pretty damn good job thermodynamically. Far better than any internal combustion engine will ever do. They aren't simple machines either, far from it, in many ways far more complex than an internal combustion engine. Deceptively simple maybe. Ok so it's only steam, but you have variable valve timing, exaughst use to increase air intake, then you have to consider, just how do you shove water into a pressure vessle at 100psi?
Polybun 1 year ago 20
@Polybun with cone injectors.
kez259 1 year ago
@kez259 Or a pump. Feed water pumps actually work pretty damn well... when they aren't broken.
Polybun 1 year ago
@Polybun Either way, it's a damned feat of engineering using steam from a locomotive boiler at 280 psi to force water back into itself at a higher pressure, a wonder of the industrial world. Although we have a few problems with injectors on the locos, it's usually a "tap it wi' t'hammer" type of job, haha.
kez259 1 year ago
@kez259 eh, not really. I mean, water is nearly non compressible, so it's only a matter of a good seal at that point, and graphite packing will more than hold a few hundred psi. Amazing is the sp&s 700's feed water pump, that runs off of waste steam from the cylinders. Mind you, it's a big fucking pump.
Polybun 1 year ago
@Polybun, i have yet to fully understand how boiler injectors work, they are cool though.
NathansBackwoods 1 year ago
Well, it's multiple things at work. First steam hits the cold feed water and is turned into water, creating a strong vacume. Because of a check valve, the water is then drawn into the injector. But the stream still has great velocity, so it then forces the water through another check valve, that rams it into the boiler. It uses a good deal of steam to run an injector, but, a small amount of water makes a large amount of steam. The water is also preheated by the steam.
Polybun 1 year ago
@Polybun Not to shoot you down (I love steam engines), but steam piston engines have somewhere around 6% thermal efficiency, whereas a typical gas engine had around 12%, and a diesel around 27%. Consult this video for more information if you please:/watch?v=GMdLbPS9R20&feature=channel.
mwhite112393 1 year ago
@mwhite112393
I think you are being generous, steam engines are more like 4%.
peterfarrow 1 year ago
@mwhite112393 Have any proof of that? I don't think you are that close, and really it depends on the boiler. The engines themselves do really well. If it wasn't very effecient, power plants wouldn't use it.
Polybun 1 year ago
@Polybun Well, last I checked, Plants use turbines. I posted a video link to a documentary about it all. It lists the efficiencies of all pre-gasoline engines a ways into the video.
mwhite112393 1 year ago
@Polybun
Steam engines have about 4% efficiency, internal combustion engines range from 18% to 40% depending on factors such as petrol or diesel etc. To claim that an external combustion steam engine like this is good thermodynamically from the burning of solid fuel to turning the wheels, is inaccurate.
However steam engines such as these are much more fun and exciting, but NOT efficient.
peterfarrow 1 year ago 7
@peterfarrow But they are some of the most powerful fuckers as well lol I think if the steam engine was revisited and redone I think it would out do diesel anyday
14omega28ok 4 months ago
@Polybun agreed...its still viable and people are starting to take notice of steam again...hand pumps can push water under heavy psi, some hydraulic hand pumps for hydrostatic tests can go to 10 000 psi no probs...
porpoisefathom 1 year ago
@Polybun - feedwater pump or steam powered lifting injectors.
bcberryfarm 10 months ago
@Polybun Actually they're the lest thermally efficient. Combustion engines don't fair much better, but they're more efficient than Steam.
mwhite112393 7 months ago
@ftorresgamez But not the doble. Waiting to make steam is only a problem in fire tube boilers. In a water tube boiler you have steam in seconds.
Polybun 10 months ago
Cool video. have pulled a couple times with Case steam engines. you can tell the sled operator feathered it for this small engine. it would have powered out at the begining about the time it sounded liek it was going to, then he opened hte throttle because there wasnt alot of load on so he was able to keep going. :)
colinb110 2 years ago
Paint never made anything run better! lol Nice engine and great pull!
ejcantrell 2 years ago
ha ha mind if I steal that quote?!
Corollaboi 2 years ago
very strong steam engine
CBMXX 2 years ago
Met a lovely lady at the GDSF yesterday. A Marshall Roller, the guy running her caressed her with the occasional wipe of an oily rag (well a lady is entitled to wear a bit of lippy if she's on a day out). Otherwise she was just as she was, plain wonderful.
applecounty 2 years ago
WOW full pull !!
nomemoalaroche 2 years ago
I have seen Daves engine pull lots of times before but missed this pull.
Great film+sound. Good pull!
One year they had a big Fowler plowing engine on! (That just pissed it!!)
benmk21600 2 years ago
FULL PULL!!!! That was sweet!
deadspong 2 years ago
Gosh, that engine need to have a repaint and fast! DX
thecoolt 2 years ago 2
I think thats how its staying - the just of the fields look!
robkitchuk1991 2 years ago
Well, just as long as the owner knows what he/she is doing
thecoolt 2 years ago
Repaint!! No way!!
Daves engine looks just right!
benmk21600 2 years ago
Whatever man, and like I said before "Just as long as the owner knows what he/she is doing".
End of discussion
thecoolt 2 years ago 2