Faster Game Play + Serious Multitasking

[tazss159]

LOL Of course a tripple core will be faster then a dual core... don't listen to the retards over at AMD.

[carljohnson26101985]

RIP INTEL... AMD IS THE FUTURE!!!

[gmk120]

@carljohnson26101985 kinda ironic, because is AMD the one who is going to stop doing processors, they said that 1 month ago.

[losmzika]

Good Phenom x6 Elite Box 3:1 ghz 6 gb ddr3 GTX460 1 gb ddr5 

[ItsReal2000]

AMD is cheaper and slower Intel is expensive but faster

[carljohnson26101985]

@ItsReal2000 why do think like that???Ohhh... i got it. May be you are running on Intel processed brains.. think faster, it's time to switch to AMD :D

[ItsReal2000]

@carljohnson26101985 I changed the system from AMD to Intel

[carljohnson26101985]

@ItsReal2000 That's y your brain is too slow to respond... ;)

[ItsReal2000]

@carljohnson26101985 write in google "PassMark Software - CPU Benchmark" and you will see charts.

[carljohnson26101985]

@ItsReal2000 We will see some new changes this month.. AMD FX bulldozer * core processor is coming... watch out...

[przs33]

for who thinks that triple core vs dual core is not fair: ITS FAIR because the AMD triple core is in the same price range as the Intel dual cores....

[jacktharippares]

actually the cheapest core i5 quad core beats all the amd quad cores clock for clock.. im not talking about a huge difference and don't get me wrong.. i like amd and i've had amd cpu's since my first pc but this video is shit

[n213978745]

Let me say one thing clear first: I love AMD more than Intel. But I don't like these comparison commercial. Because they remind me of "Get a Mac" commercial -- insulting others in order to raise self status

[Jozehkmz]

640 percent faster game lowest????

no thats a lie

[altu892]

amd is much cheaper for the smae price range, but intel got enthusiast performance

[UACDOOM]

AMD FTW

[thefarazch]

INTEL sucks

[nikosyv]

i think it's the intel integrated graphics thats the problem with the intel system. Intel's cpu's are much faster in general, but you have to pay 2x as much as AMD for the same performance

[Willyfisch]

"640% slower game play"

how is that possible? oO

when it would be 100% slower, it would already be 0 performance....

[AMVDawg]

@Willyfisch maybe they ment 64% o_O

[Lnfinit3BIaz3]

@Willyfisch not really it just means that the amd platform is 6.4X faster than the intel platform and it isnt really surprising since intel chipsets suck at graphics while amd has ATI graphics which are way faster than the intel ones

[Aqwert76]

I Like both.

[Reyneeru]

lol. amd is better for games...

i have a amd sempron 1.8 ghz ( 1 core)

and im playing resident evil 5 and works great at high resolution.. i get 35 fps

[Spectr0n]

AMD is much cheaper and faster.. so AMD FTW!

[skimowhite586]

@Spectr0n yahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­aaaaaaaaa hells yeah

[Intel1502]

@Spectr0n Wrong, amd is much cheaper, yet NOWHERE near as fast.

[HeadouCompany]

@Spectr0n not faster!just cheaper

[spam699]

For comment below, this video like all others, show that AMD are ahead..

How can you say there behind..

[namegamereviews]

i hate it when AMD attacks Intel. I'm not a fanboy of any side, but that's so unprofessional.

If AMD was good enough, they wouldn't need to criticize its rival company like this. This truly shows that AMD is still far behind Intel.

Look at Intel, they don't need to keep saying "yeah we're better than AMD crap." and they can still sell their products.

[AFANARCHIST]

They have to do this coz there is a whole big Legend about that Intel stuff that just let's u without money and gives the same quality..

[buckyaroo]

I hate these fucking noobs! Of course AMD will win with a crappy AMD Phenom triple core. YOU CAN'T COMPARE A TRIPLE CORE WITH A DUEL CORE YOU FUCKING NOOBIES!

[PatVRulz]

cheaper for more, yes u can

[Artem12300]

At that time, Intel didn't have Quad. So AMD was ahead of them with 3 processors.

[funnybun123]

The best music part starts at 0:30

[RectalSquid]

all i have to say is. if you are a gamer who wants performance and still have a decent sized wallet, go with AMD. some ppl say their bugged, those ppl work for intel :O

[darkerhat]

What's the song used?

[happyguy215]

Intel is not sluggish, its very fast. Both Intel and AMD make great processors. Its just a matter of preference. Some people like Intel others like AMD. one is not better than the other

[saif07]

i agree.. both AMD and Intel have their own perspective goals to achieve..and both showed geat improvements..but i was wondering why AMD has a very little L2 cache compared to intel..??

[ZZchaz]

AMD videos have such catchy songs.

[s4iko1337]

amds 4 core cpus had bugs so they made 3 cores of them -.- im fine with my q6600 3,2 ghz

[cheesemaster23]

Lol AMD/ATI sucks so much that they have to compare their tri core to an intel dual core and say theirs is better then. Pathetic.

[MummRa88]

They compared solutions of the same price, Intel processors will charge a fortune in this whole world knows, systems and comparing the same price whoever has the best performance? The answer is always AMD =)

[fpscracker232]

hehehe no ur dual core intel has more clock speed they are like balance , intel fan guys lol

[PatVRulz]

they do this b/c the price of the triple core is better than the Intel dual cores. Also, if they could, they would compare their triple cores to Intels, if intel had any? and btw, AMD would still win. Also, may i not remind you that the ath hd 4870x2 is the best graphics card out there at the moment. It is the best, and is a fraction of the price of the nvidia kinds, which aren't even as good as it :P

[BobbyJEL101]

oh yeah tottaly agree

[funnybun123]

Intel's have no triple cores for desktops. And AMD is telling you to buy the triple cores instead of Intel's dual cores.

[levi094]

AMD is using a Tri-core not to mention intels integrated graphics are made for gaming only for basic display purposes...

[neyway]

AMD FTW