This is awesome plane . This plane shows americans that the europeans are better than them . I thing my countri Bulgaria must buy those plane to kick some turkish asses ;)
I dunno y malaysia dont wanna buy gripen, single engine means lower gas , meteor missile , iris and taurus , its all good.americans air raids r all now by f16 cos lower gas so this must be good enough for us. Buy superhornet and americans gonna keep the source code, what the point of spending 80 million fighter?!
@iamstarstuff001 Not on par with F-16, completely different. Gripen has way more capable tasks to handle than the F-16. Right now, some of them are stationed in Libya and has already done 1/4th of the work the rest of the surveillance-teams have done - And no, I am not a swedish fanboy, lol.
@3ISAMAGICNUMBR The russian air force consists of around 3000 air crafts and they plan to introduce their 5th generation PAK FA in 2015, the Swedish air force intends to operate only 100 Gripens and it will remain in service until 2040.
@Meatlooaf För det första skulle vi få stryk av Ryssland, inte kanske, vi skulle. För det andra så finns det en poäng med det. Sverige skulle aldrig ha råd att ha ett tillräckligt starkt försvar för att i längden kunna stå emot en supermakt av gamla Soviet eller USA:s standard, men vi har råd att ha ett tillräckligt starkt försvar för att värna vår neutralitet (nåja). Tanken är att Sverige ska ses som ett land som går att invadera, men att det kommer kosta för mycket att göra det.
@swedelock I would like to believe in what you are saying but I rather think that 40-60 are in active service. Those figures are still certainly also however over rated.
Gripen doesn't ned thrust reversers, because it has a VERY effective new system of braking at landing - the camards, the air brakes, and the elevons combine through the computer to stop (making more effective use of the wheel brakes through aerodynamics). calling Gripen a budget-Viggen is actually therefore an insult to a greatly improved aircraft.
Has Sweden ever produced an aircraft with NO foreign technology assistance e.g radar, engine, electronics etc? Love the Griben, but the Viggen beats them all when it comes to look and brute force!
@Bilderbergz the basic version has an engine that is way weaker than the american counterpart f-16, but it's also way lighter only 18,700 lb (f-16 26,500 lb and f-35 44,400 lb), next version of Gripen will have a engine with more than 1:1 thrust to weight ratio and will be able to supercruise as the only single engined airplane to do so
@Bilderbergz mostly saab, though it's practically impossible to build or upgrade an airplane without some kind of cooperation, like the engines which are license built GE F404 and they are going to be replaced by GE F414G
amazing engine on that but can it hover?The f35 can hover like a harrier and is also multi purpose like this. Which 1 is best? Im not taking sides because im half swedish and half american.
@fpsHacker5950 it can' t hover bucus is too fast for it but is a little bit better in bombing and dogfight and has better radar,but the f35 is awesome!!!
@MultiMarcus99 Does the f35 have more manueverability than the f35? Im wondering wich is the best air 2 air. Wich 1 is better? Oh yea how about the f22? It has 2 engines. Is it better 2 have 1?
As we all know Sweden is a very neutral land. Not because we're pussies - But because we value things differently from, let's say the US? So if a country is acting up on the other side of the world? The US would say "THEY'VE GOT NUKES! AND DONKEYS FILLED WITH NUKES IN THEIR HATS!". Whilst Sweden would go - "You know what? We don't care. Now if you'll excuse me, I've got some amazing beer and some hot blondes that need some helpin' ".
+ WW2 - Let Nazi trains through Sweden, not that neutral ;).
Vi får hoppas att dom lär oss hur man gör ett, hade han läst på...så var det inte. man blir så matt, vem bryr sig om ett land som har världens största vallgrav....
We was inwar for like 150-200 years ago. We don't want war. Ignore this idot, he's a troll. Sweden makes it own! We had 2 car brands, Saab and Volvo, we have Scania which is the biggest automobile brand in the world, we make our own warfighter, ill betcha you shop at our IKEA?
mittshiett,dont really matter that much if it wins over f-15. Jas.should be play fighting his brother f-22 and then see what happens..thats more like a fair.fight : )
@thugproofclips Well it might be more fair for the f-22 but not for the jas 39 as f-22 is 20 years younger, i mean lets hope f-22 can get a fair fight with a 20 year older aircraft...
well the Gripen is the most manouverable fighter measured in both turn rate and turn radius while at the same time it manages to keep its energy. And the higher the speed is the turn icreases too. So all fighters try to place themself within Corner Speed. Which is the optimal speed for a tight turn. And the Gripen has something none of the other fighters have...an high developed data link. Which made the Gripen won every aerial encounter in the Red Flag exercise against all u bad ass F-15 =)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nice looking jet, and i bet it can do some damage. BUT against US Fighter jets it (Gripen) is inferior... iʻm not trying to talk down on the Gripen, this is just FACTS!!!! Take it how you like, but it is what it is. : )
it is nto inferior... the only yet in the world that outmatches it in air to air is the F22 the F22 is Slightly better not much but it costs MUCH more
The main diffrence between gripen and american planes is the gipen have centre of gravity on back for better handling ,but it needs a full assistance of computers. The american planes like F16 have centre of gravity in a center of body.
Actually the F22 is considerably less agile than gen 4 fighters. A deliberate design decision was made to sacrifice manuverability for performance and stealth.
The USAF made this decision before with the F4 Phantom. At the time, the USAF thought that dogfighting was obsolete. This was a big mistake, hence the next generation fighters, the F-16 and 18, were highly manuverable, small and agile.
Only time will tell if the F22 design is the correct decision or a repeated mistake.
my bad. I got my phantoms and thunderchiefs mixed up with the cannon thing.
Anyways point was... I believe I said head to head dogfight. There is no way a gigantic f-15 could outmanoeuvre a gripen. get real.
If you are going to get into bvr then that brings a whole heap of other variables into the mix, and would generally favour which ever aircraft has the best avionics! whoever gets a tone first is generally going to win.
Well, maneuverability is only one of the major components of an good dogfighter. The F-15 has vastly superior performance (speed, climb, acceleration), it is no slouch in agility, and it can carry a very large compliment of long-range/short-range AA missiles. The F-16 and 18s are considerably more maneuverable than an F-15 yet both get clobbered by the F-15 in one-on-one training exercises.
In a twisting winding dogfight, sustaining moment it critical. Most aircraft loose speed, hence manuevering ability, rapidly as a dogfight progresses. The pilots of F-14s knew this all too well. If they let their speed drop, they would be a sitting duck and, even worse, the F14 wings would automatically expand and give away this fact away to the opponent.
The powerful F-15 has far more stamina than most lighter aircraft such as the F-16, 18, Mirage-2000 or (no doubt) the Gripen.
Actually the F-15E can but its only be structural intergity and the pilot can deal w/ over 9Gs for that long. 2. Bigger wings and Two stronger engines. but sustained dog fight. The grippen will get the upper hand due to the Aim9x and helmet mounted display.
For sheer maneuverability the Su-27/33/35/37 family of aircraft are in a class of their own and no other aircraft can come close in this regard. Their helmet mounting targeting system also gives them a huge edge in twisting-turning combat.
It is interesting to see two different philosophies at the moment. The USAF is betting on speed and stealth whereas the Russians are putting there faith in dog-fighting. Only time will tell who is correct.
well basicly i think the us would win from a long range engagement seeing we can take out planes from about 5 miles or sumthing and the russions would win in dog fighting both have ther waekensses
Actually the Russians are believed to be considerably ahead in AA missile development. Their latest operational missile, the R-77, is believed to have greater practical range and far better manuverability than the the AMRAAM. Though not as agile, the K-100 and R-77 have even greater range.
This has led to the biggest critism to the F-22 (aside from its price). It must use an internal weapons bay hence it will not be able to carry a lengthened, extended range AMRAAM designed in response to the R-77. The USAAF however feels that even though the F-22 is out-ranged it's stealth will allow it to close in.
Nope ;) You're very patriotic and that's good but you should catch some information about it first. As a part of a system it plays a great role, and it's one of the most effective and efficient aircraft systems Sweden could have. IMO.
Depends on many factors, since each aircraft has their own strengths and weaknesses.
The F-15 has routinely clobbered the F-16 in 1-on-1 and 2-on-2 exercises. However in larger engagements it has always turned out 50/50.
I am guessing than in a large engagement, since the Saab offers better, more modern situational awareness and ergonimics for the pilot, the Saab will triumph. In a 1-on-1 the (vastly more expensive) F-15 would come out on top due to it's performance advantages.
That is not what actual training exercises indicate. The F-15 clobbers F-16, 18's and Mirage 2000's in 1-on-1's and 2-on-2's and no doubt would do the same to the Gripen. They are completely different class of aircraft made for different mission objectives.
The F-15 project was arguably the most expensive undertaking ever for a combat aircraft. At the time, the USAF was in utter panic over the perceived Mig-25 threat. The USSR in turn spent a staggering sum on the revolutionary Su-27.
på den mottagande sidan isåfall. Jag har bara hört att den är busenkel att flyga, en dröm helt enkelt som den danske testpiloten säger i en intervju med dansk tv.
ja på 80 talet, vet inte om du fattat att vi är på 2000 talet =), next generation, inget är samma, sen är ju våran ofentlighets prinsip sådan att man visar alla misstag, det gör inte andra leverantörer, rätt dumt för JAS
Min fader är stridspilot själv och flyger 39:an :P,har suttit i den och det är en upplevelsen vill jag lova!:P,spec om man jämför den nya mot den gammla modellen,inga mätare bara skärmar xD
Just came in to my mind. You know how the speech of these jets is almost always female? You know? *beep beep* "pull up" ect. Aparently it has something to do with men reacting better to female voice.
Imagine how much better it would work if they were a bit more creative:
*beep beep* Pull up *beep beep* Pull up *beep beep* are you listening to me? *beep beep* you never listen! *beep beep* my mother was right! *beep beep* I should have married a rich man *beep beep* Pull up this instant!!
It was never intended to be the best fighter, but to be the best swing role combat aircraft in the world, and thats something I think it achieve pretty well. The JAS is what a modern military aircraft must be, cheap, reliable, flexible, capable to interact well with other aircrafts and to fight along side with them in joint operations. And about stealth I think the Gripen's small size and radar jammer are going to work just fine. It worked against other aircrafts in Redflag Alaska and Italy.
Gripen, the best defensive plane in the World. It has the best tactical logistic figures for defending a country.
Highly cost-efficient. Stunning beauty.
A machine with a soul.
Do not buy the JSF - tool of the U.S. secret government. The same assholes who murdered Kennedy and that Eisenhower warned about in his resignation speech.
Buy Gripen.
The choice of the Free Peace Loving Peoples ! 100% free of future threatening nuclear weapon stupidity and tyrannical attitude.
I wciąż się zastanawiam dlaczego Polskie Siły Lotniczne nie zdecydowały się na tą maszynę?? Wg mnie lepiej byłoby mieć więcej nowszych i łatwiejszych w obsłudze i serwisie, i przede wszystkim nowszych maszyn od Szwedów...
The newest aircraft of the Swiss air force!
Love it.
101financepeace 2 months ago
Ohhh!!! Nice.
kerkchaii 2 months ago
This is awesome plane . This plane shows americans that the europeans are better than them . I thing my countri Bulgaria must buy those plane to kick some turkish asses ;)
bulwrestling 4 months ago
Yes every body!!! Lets go for Gripen. Regards Svein, Norway
bergvoll14 5 months ago
waw i didnt know sweden had packed heat.
ALANLEEY 7 months ago
6 Norwegian gay pacifists watched this video.
gummybearkiller1 8 months ago 2
I dunno y malaysia dont wanna buy gripen, single engine means lower gas , meteor missile , iris and taurus , its all good.americans air raids r all now by f16 cos lower gas so this must be good enough for us. Buy superhornet and americans gonna keep the source code, what the point of spending 80 million fighter?!
21mij 8 months ago
The Gripen is on par with the F-16. The 16 has better weapon systems and electronics, but saying all that I really like the Gripen.
iamstarstuff001 8 months ago
@iamstarstuff001 Not on par with F-16, completely different. Gripen has way more capable tasks to handle than the F-16. Right now, some of them are stationed in Libya and has already done 1/4th of the work the rest of the surveillance-teams have done - And no, I am not a swedish fanboy, lol.
aztaclalz 8 months ago
BEAUTIFUL! i every day see that cuz i live in hungary (kecskemét)
sestesha 9 months ago
i hope...soon in croatian air force!...
zvonezg111 9 months ago
i hope...soon in croatian air force!...
zvonezg111 9 months ago
that is one sexy plane!!!
SAMER63 9 months ago
You gotta love this machine.
Jedi2x98 10 months ago
Looks like a Eurofighter Typhoon to me.
Jedi2x98 10 months ago
@Jedi2x98 Eurofighter is a ripoff of the Gripen and Gripen looks better...
cryteeek 10 months ago
@cryteeek ?
sakoshooter48 3 months ago
With this kind of air force, Sweden will never have to take shit from anyone, not even the russians.
3ISAMAGICNUMBR 10 months ago
@3ISAMAGICNUMBR The russian air force consists of around 3000 air crafts and they plan to introduce their 5th generation PAK FA in 2015, the Swedish air force intends to operate only 100 Gripens and it will remain in service until 2040.
jimmyn89SWE 10 months ago
@jimmyn89SWE thats all digits...sweden will never take shot from anyone, we might loose against russia, but we are not gonna take shit from them!
Meatlooaf 10 months ago 2
@Meatlooaf För det första skulle vi få stryk av Ryssland, inte kanske, vi skulle. För det andra så finns det en poäng med det. Sverige skulle aldrig ha råd att ha ett tillräckligt starkt försvar för att i längden kunna stå emot en supermakt av gamla Soviet eller USA:s standard, men vi har råd att ha ett tillräckligt starkt försvar för att värna vår neutralitet (nåja). Tanken är att Sverige ska ses som ett land som går att invadera, men att det kommer kosta för mycket att göra det.
TheWhiskeyhead 10 months ago
@TheWhiskeyhead vi får skaffa lite nukes ;)
DjurgardensIF1891 10 months ago
Does anyone know how many Sweden got these plains?
Hallelujaa123 1 year ago
@Hallelujaa123
Sweden has 140 of these planes, thought only 60-70 is in active service. Rest can be operantional with in the week.
swedelock 9 months ago
@swedelock I would like to believe in what you are saying but I rather think that 40-60 are in active service. Those figures are still certainly also however over rated.
smorgasbord3 7 months ago
@Hallelujaa123 around 200+ i think
21mij 8 months ago
This aircraft can land on short highways
Rumblinpara 1 year ago
Well if you just simply take into account the absence of the thrust-reversers you can say that its sort of a"budget-viggen" yes.
Thourette 1 year ago
@Thourette
Gripen doesn't ned thrust reversers, because it has a VERY effective new system of braking at landing - the camards, the air brakes, and the elevons combine through the computer to stop (making more effective use of the wheel brakes through aerodynamics). calling Gripen a budget-Viggen is actually therefore an insult to a greatly improved aircraft.
rynopot 1 year ago
is this jet dimensionally larger than the J37 Viggen?
adrianrubi 1 year ago
@adrianrubi No, its smaller.
Thourette 1 year ago
@Thourette ...i see. so it doesn't have the thrust reversers then.
adrianrubi 1 year ago
@adrianrubi No it doesnt have the thrust-reversers of the Viggen.
Thourette 1 year ago
@Thourette I see. So it's like a "Budget-Viggen."
adrianrubi 1 year ago
Comment removed
kingkodo 1 year ago
stealth technology should be added to this plane
vivek1471990 1 year ago
@vivek1471990 It has electronical stealth.
Thourette 1 year ago
Var det på F7 ?
MsPilot92 1 year ago
Is the F-16 bigger or smaller than this jet?
RTiger18 1 year ago
@RTiger18 Bigger.
CptZebastian 1 year ago
@RTiger18 f-16 is bigger than this aircraft but no more potentiality
tongpeter2010 1 year ago
Jakt, attack och spaningsplan GO Sverige GO
Hallelujaa123 1 year ago
very nice plane
greetings from USA
Inklebonker1 1 year ago 2
POWER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Suck on that, U.S.A!!
totalmedievalist 1 year ago 2
@totalmedievalist Ignorant post by you. You know nothing about US military power.
ruel1072 1 year ago
The best fighterplane, the best pilots, and soon we have Gripen NG..... :-)
Filmfanatiken 1 year ago 6
Nice nice!!
88Josef 1 year ago
Has Sweden ever produced an aircraft with NO foreign technology assistance e.g radar, engine, electronics etc? Love the Griben, but the Viggen beats them all when it comes to look and brute force!
Badger071 1 year ago
Great video about great aircraft! :-) Thanks for this nice plane.
Greetins from Czech Rebublic - Pride Gripen owner
BohemiaPatriot 1 year ago
The Gripen is an extremely strong, little aircraft.
Swedish jets always look good and show a nice silouette in the air.
I rather liked the Viggen. The Draken was also very nice.
Scheltokeeper 1 year ago 3
although this jet is not the best, for some reason i have always liked it. The engine doesnt look that powerful though.
Bilderbergz 1 year ago
@Bilderbergz the basic version has an engine that is way weaker than the american counterpart f-16, but it's also way lighter only 18,700 lb (f-16 26,500 lb and f-35 44,400 lb), next version of Gripen will have a engine with more than 1:1 thrust to weight ratio and will be able to supercruise as the only single engined airplane to do so
zeoverlord 1 year ago
@zeoverlord Is this all done by saab? or is it a joint venture with another firm?
Bilderbergz 1 year ago
@Bilderbergz mostly saab, though it's practically impossible to build or upgrade an airplane without some kind of cooperation, like the engines which are license built GE F404 and they are going to be replaced by GE F414G
zeoverlord 1 year ago
That takeoff was sick
williamday247 1 year ago
my dad made the radar and targeting system for this.
fpsHacker5950 1 year ago
VACKERT!:D
vilma8989 1 year ago
amazing engine on that but can it hover?The f35 can hover like a harrier and is also multi purpose like this. Which 1 is best? Im not taking sides because im half swedish and half american.
fpsHacker5950 1 year ago
@fpsHacker5950 it can' t hover bucus is too fast for it but is a little bit better in bombing and dogfight and has better radar,but the f35 is awesome!!!
MultiMarcus99 1 year ago
@MultiMarcus99 Does the f35 have more manueverability than the f35? Im wondering wich is the best air 2 air. Wich 1 is better? Oh yea how about the f22? It has 2 engines. Is it better 2 have 1?
fpsHacker5950 1 year ago
As we all know Sweden is a very neutral land. Not because we're pussies - But because we value things differently from, let's say the US? So if a country is acting up on the other side of the world? The US would say "THEY'VE GOT NUKES! AND DONKEYS FILLED WITH NUKES IN THEIR HATS!". Whilst Sweden would go - "You know what? We don't care. Now if you'll excuse me, I've got some amazing beer and some hot blondes that need some helpin' ".
+ WW2 - Let Nazi trains through Sweden, not that neutral ;).
aztaclalz 1 year ago
Vi får hoppas att dom lär oss hur man gör ett, hade han läst på...så var det inte. man blir så matt, vem bryr sig om ett land som har världens största vallgrav....
MrHerrKarl 1 year ago
Jas Gripen 39, the swedish battleflight. HEJA SVERIGE HEJA FÖRSVARSMAKTEN.
ibrahimovic9993 1 year ago
sweden is a pussy land who's not been in fight since 1500 or something ashahahahaahaaha
zaffe93 1 year ago
@zaffe93, Its country. Not land. Go back to school, kid
vladdeN83 1 year ago
@zaffe93
We was inwar for like 150-200 years ago. We don't want war. Ignore this idot, he's a troll. Sweden makes it own! We had 2 car brands, Saab and Volvo, we have Scania which is the biggest automobile brand in the world, we make our own warfighter, ill betcha you shop at our IKEA?
Norway, Finland, Denmark doesn't have this power.
pontusjannesson 1 year ago
@zaffe93
Battle of Narva 1700, check that one out.
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
That landing was awesome!! Man that was a short landing!
InfomaniacJack 1 year ago
@nihilistika hey sweden is a U.S. allie so the U.S. would help you out we dont just stand by like we did before we joined ww2
ghdgdgr 1 year ago
Thats almost as powerful as my dick!
gyllback 1 year ago 2
okey?? haha :P
nickazima08 1 year ago
SWEDISH POWER"
omgomg113 2 years ago 48
i love jas
FillegoesPro 2 years ago 34
is he breathing like that cause the g force ore the adrenaline?
thugproofclips 2 years ago
bit of both id say and also the body working faster
flying like he is would increase his heart rate to pump blood to the brain (to concentrate) and therefore more oxygen is needed to work faster
armarpgBlink 2 years ago
@thugproofclips cause of the g's
cnrivr89 2 years ago
No, he's got asthma.
kildesamling 2 years ago
because off the G forces
knlop 2 years ago
flying a fighter ore fucking a cute girl...i would get more fun when flying a fighter: )
thugproofclips 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
JUST TRY A TWIN-ENGINE!!!!
40pipoune 2 years ago
if ur a pilot you'd get girls on a conveyor-belt...
zauii89 2 years ago 2
mittshiett,dont really matter that much if it wins over f-15. Jas.should be play fighting his brother f-22 and then see what happens..thats more like a fair.fight : )
thugproofclips 2 years ago 2
that would be kind of cool!
zicksmile 2 years ago
@thugproofclips Well it might be more fair for the f-22 but not for the jas 39 as f-22 is 20 years younger, i mean lets hope f-22 can get a fair fight with a 20 year older aircraft...
zaphr89 1 year ago
It's made to land on roads, look at the short landing at the movie.
swdendud 2 years ago
yeah!! sweden
siiixten 2 years ago
well the Gripen is the most manouverable fighter measured in both turn rate and turn radius while at the same time it manages to keep its energy. And the higher the speed is the turn icreases too. So all fighters try to place themself within Corner Speed. Which is the optimal speed for a tight turn. And the Gripen has something none of the other fighters have...an high developed data link. Which made the Gripen won every aerial encounter in the Red Flag exercise against all u bad ass F-15 =)
mittshiett 2 years ago
Gripen is more light-weight and can do better turns then other jets , because it only have one engine. Instead, its a bit slower...
mistymontains 2 years ago
@mistymontains
Speed mean nothing in combat...dog fight is always in very slow speed (under Mach 1)
Jimderkaisser 2 years ago 2
Every factors count in the real dogfight speed, skill and eventhough your spirit n soul.
phranai 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice looking jet, and i bet it can do some damage. BUT against US Fighter jets it (Gripen) is inferior... iʻm not trying to talk down on the Gripen, this is just FACTS!!!! Take it how you like, but it is what it is. : )
cherylz1 2 years ago
it is nto inferior... the only yet in the world that outmatches it in air to air is the F22 the F22 is Slightly better not much but it costs MUCH more
Mattebubben 2 years ago 2
Swedish steel
jn1720 2 years ago 4
I HAVE TO FLY ONE OF THOSE SOMETIME !
MisterFigge 2 years ago
The main diffrence between gripen and american planes is the gipen have centre of gravity on back for better handling ,but it needs a full assistance of computers. The american planes like F16 have centre of gravity in a center of body.
ZephyrWestWind 2 years ago
Man only the F22 could match the agility on this thing!
welowrider32 2 years ago
Actually the F22 is considerably less agile than gen 4 fighters. A deliberate design decision was made to sacrifice manuverability for performance and stealth.
The USAF made this decision before with the F4 Phantom. At the time, the USAF thought that dogfighting was obsolete. This was a big mistake, hence the next generation fighters, the F-16 and 18, were highly manuverable, small and agile.
Only time will tell if the F22 design is the correct decision or a repeated mistake.
BlackBeastofAaaaagh 2 years ago
absolutely, f22 and jsf, both HUGE bloody planes, will the f22 end up like the f-105? well ... at least is has a cannon....
yogicolonial 2 years ago
Well, actually the F-105 was designed as a low altitude high-speed strike aircraft wereas the role of the F-22 is air superiority.
Ironically the F-105 claimed more Migs in Vietnam than the Phantoms sent to escort them since the latter were not equipped with cannons.
BlackBeastofAaaaagh 2 years ago
my bad. I got my phantoms and thunderchiefs mixed up with the cannon thing.
Anyways point was... I believe I said head to head dogfight. There is no way a gigantic f-15 could outmanoeuvre a gripen. get real.
If you are going to get into bvr then that brings a whole heap of other variables into the mix, and would generally favour which ever aircraft has the best avionics! whoever gets a tone first is generally going to win.
I would still put my money on the NG gripen.
yogicolonial 2 years ago
Well, maneuverability is only one of the major components of an good dogfighter. The F-15 has vastly superior performance (speed, climb, acceleration), it is no slouch in agility, and it can carry a very large compliment of long-range/short-range AA missiles. The F-16 and 18s are considerably more maneuverable than an F-15 yet both get clobbered by the F-15 in one-on-one training exercises.
... continued
BlackBeastofAaaaagh 2 years ago
... continued
In a twisting winding dogfight, sustaining moment it critical. Most aircraft loose speed, hence manuevering ability, rapidly as a dogfight progresses. The pilots of F-14s knew this all too well. If they let their speed drop, they would be a sitting duck and, even worse, the F14 wings would automatically expand and give away this fact away to the opponent.
The powerful F-15 has far more stamina than most lighter aircraft such as the F-16, 18, Mirage-2000 or (no doubt) the Gripen.
BlackBeastofAaaaagh 2 years ago
Actually the F-15E can but its only be structural intergity and the pilot can deal w/ over 9Gs for that long. 2. Bigger wings and Two stronger engines. but sustained dog fight. The grippen will get the upper hand due to the Aim9x and helmet mounted display.
Genki1Hasegawa 2 years ago
more like su 35 or su 37
darkshadowscene 2 years ago
For sheer maneuverability the Su-27/33/35/37 family of aircraft are in a class of their own and no other aircraft can come close in this regard. Their helmet mounting targeting system also gives them a huge edge in twisting-turning combat.
It is interesting to see two different philosophies at the moment. The USAF is betting on speed and stealth whereas the Russians are putting there faith in dog-fighting. Only time will tell who is correct.
BlackBeastofAaaaagh 2 years ago
well basicly i think the us would win from a long range engagement seeing we can take out planes from about 5 miles or sumthing and the russions would win in dog fighting both have ther waekensses
darkshadowscene 2 years ago
Actually the Russians are believed to be considerably ahead in AA missile development. Their latest operational missile, the R-77, is believed to have greater practical range and far better manuverability than the the AMRAAM. Though not as agile, the K-100 and R-77 have even greater range.
BlackBeastofAaaaagh 2 years ago
This has led to the biggest critism to the F-22 (aside from its price). It must use an internal weapons bay hence it will not be able to carry a lengthened, extended range AMRAAM designed in response to the R-77. The USAAF however feels that even though the F-22 is out-ranged it's stealth will allow it to close in.
BlackBeastofAaaaagh 2 years ago
Saab 39 gripen rules it owns ewerbody other fighter aircraft
MrEscape7 2 years ago
Nope ;) You're very patriotic and that's good but you should catch some information about it first. As a part of a system it plays a great role, and it's one of the most effective and efficient aircraft systems Sweden could have. IMO.
Love gripen :D and NG is great :)
Notasthinkasudrunkim 2 years ago
Ser dem varje dag utanför mitt fönster i Linköping. De är riktigt häftiga, men dånar rätt så bra ocksa :D
mattegeniet 2 years ago
Feelfree, YES!
With no doubt
Addewallen 2 years ago
Can Jas-39 win against F-15c in air to air combat?
FeelFree3 2 years ago
Depends on many factors, since each aircraft has their own strengths and weaknesses.
The F-15 has routinely clobbered the F-16 in 1-on-1 and 2-on-2 exercises. However in larger engagements it has always turned out 50/50.
I am guessing than in a large engagement, since the Saab offers better, more modern situational awareness and ergonimics for the pilot, the Saab will triumph. In a 1-on-1 the (vastly more expensive) F-15 would come out on top due to it's performance advantages.
BlackBeastofAaaaagh 2 years ago
a gripen would OWN an f-15 in a straight up head to head dogfight
yogicolonial 2 years ago 2
Yes, but what about BVR (Beyond Visual Range) combat?
FeelFree3 2 years ago
That is not what actual training exercises indicate. The F-15 clobbers F-16, 18's and Mirage 2000's in 1-on-1's and 2-on-2's and no doubt would do the same to the Gripen. They are completely different class of aircraft made for different mission objectives.
The F-15 project was arguably the most expensive undertaking ever for a combat aircraft. At the time, the USAF was in utter panic over the perceived Mig-25 threat. The USSR in turn spent a staggering sum on the revolutionary Su-27.
BlackBeastofAaaaagh 2 years ago
well well, vi har inte fått stryk i nån "mockup" fight mot usa än så, så antar att vi har bra flyg samt piloter :P
Lennholm89 2 years ago
Man säger att Jas är en skräck för den som får uppleva den in action,
swdendud 2 years ago
på den mottagande sidan isåfall. Jag har bara hört att den är busenkel att flyga, en dröm helt enkelt som den danske testpiloten säger i en intervju med dansk tv.
romajo 2 years ago
Ja för den som styr kanske såsom dom kollapsar haha.
ActThenThink 2 years ago
ja på 80 talet, vet inte om du fattat att vi är på 2000 talet =), next generation, inget är samma, sen är ju våran ofentlighets prinsip sådan att man visar alla misstag, det gör inte andra leverantörer, rätt dumt för JAS
swdendud 2 years ago
Min fader är stridspilot själv och flyger 39:an :P,har suttit i den och det är en upplevelsen vill jag lova!:P,spec om man jämför den nya mot den gammla modellen,inga mätare bara skärmar xD
YllePelle92 2 years ago
Ljudet får mig att tänka på min barndom, uppvuxen nära Söderhamns flygflottilj.
ZJenner 2 years ago
Själv har man suttit i ett sånt där .. Ganska mäktigt plan.
W34R33 2 years ago
han andas ganska hektiskt men troligen på grund av g-kraften
jopihoop 2 years ago
Han sitter och runkar i cockpiten.
bohemenmann 2 years ago
Ojala Colombia Comprara De Estos :D
carlosdavids777 2 years ago
nej invandrare är sverige stolthet lol
Chaldean1985 2 years ago
det är Saab´s kronjuvel inom export.. enligt dom själva
Gurkmomma 2 years ago
nice rolls at 2:54 and a nice little flick at 3:46
elijahinky 2 years ago 2
Sick turn @03:46.... :-O
arono7 2 years ago
SAAB JAS 39 Gripen-ett plan i världsklass
Andiish08 2 years ago 5
Helt klart!
inspartan 2 years ago 2
Japp^^
Noob4lifexD 2 years ago
Just came in to my mind. You know how the speech of these jets is almost always female? You know? *beep beep* "pull up" ect. Aparently it has something to do with men reacting better to female voice.
Imagine how much better it would work if they were a bit more creative:
*beep beep* Pull up *beep beep* Pull up *beep beep* are you listening to me? *beep beep* you never listen! *beep beep* my mother was right! *beep beep* I should have married a rich man *beep beep* Pull up this instant!!
ect.
BlizBob 2 years ago 8
Åh fy fan :O
Det här är lätt den bästa flygfilmen hittils jag har sett på youtube 8D
Annars brukar de vara buggiga eller visa scener som är totalt ointressanta!
Creds to you guis ^^ (Y)
nozzlo92 2 years ago
Filmat över Lindköping, Såtenäs.
BlurPhur 2 years ago
I from PERU and this is The best EUROPEAN FIGHTER this plane will kill the TYPHON AND RAFALE AND NO TIME
CrlFAPMarcoSchenone 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
Nannu65 2 years ago
någon som vet varför killen andas så häftigt? om det är för att det blir varmt i masken eller om det är nåt annat som spelar in..
Frormlanst 2 years ago
Det har med g-krafterna och göra
Knasen86 2 years ago
Allright
Frormlanst 2 years ago
Nej, han runkar. Dom gjør ofta det, dom jævlarna.
bohemenmann 2 years ago
OMG it is so beautiful that it makes me cry. I LOVE JAS 39 GRIPEN. I´m going to make a tattoo of a GRIPEN on my left shoulder. I am so proud.
FlyingDoctorsLover 2 years ago
AHHAHAHA This is filmed In Sweden, LINKÖPING, over Malmslätt, you can see my house ( the big white building on the bottom left corner) @ 1.17
axelleksak 2 years ago 3
lol, coolt :P
zicksmile 2 years ago
that's funny
stevenbitter 2 years ago 2
I have seen your house ,very nice!
drosov 2 years ago
and those are from sweden!!
swehunter2000 2 years ago
What a beauty!
atnek123 2 years ago
anilingus ...are u fukin crazy :)))
kothryn3 2 years ago
You mean the user name? It is just a severe case of "every conceivably name is already taken".
:)
anilingus 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's not the best fighter anymore. American F22 Raptor is better in many ways except price.
fredrik999z 3 years ago
It was never intended to be the best fighter, but to be the best swing role combat aircraft in the world, and thats something I think it achieve pretty well. The JAS is what a modern military aircraft must be, cheap, reliable, flexible, capable to interact well with other aircrafts and to fight along side with them in joint operations. And about stealth I think the Gripen's small size and radar jammer are going to work just fine. It worked against other aircrafts in Redflag Alaska and Italy.
onlypeaceindeath 2 years ago 3
agree
GSUAD 2 years ago
Önskar jag kunde köpa en
Undrar vad de kostar. =)
Osiwaw 3 years ago 2
580 miljoner för den nya versionen, ett kap :)
244Erik 2 years ago
haha det är veckopengen ^^ haha
bonda95 2 years ago
Comment removed
kansterstrak 2 years ago
Hadde det varit lov at kjøpa for privatpersoner hadde jeg haft ett sjelv nu.
bohemenmann 2 years ago
för jävla vacker den är!
zillertaller 3 years ago 2
Comment removed
kansterstrak 3 years ago
Comment removed
kansterstrak 3 years ago
Swedish technology kicks ass! really, it kicks ass!!.. Sweden power!
333plus333 3 years ago 14
I will fly one of those one day <3
Bergvallar 3 years ago 4
Beautiful
plankgatan 3 years ago 4
Gripen, the best defensive plane in the World. It has the best tactical logistic figures for defending a country.
Highly cost-efficient. Stunning beauty.
A machine with a soul.
Do not buy the JSF - tool of the U.S. secret government. The same assholes who murdered Kennedy and that Eisenhower warned about in his resignation speech.
Buy Gripen.
The choice of the Free Peace Loving Peoples ! 100% free of future threatening nuclear weapon stupidity and tyrannical attitude.
You will love it !
Laccodel 3 years ago 8
The best in the world
Megaviolent 3 years ago 4
Snyggt, men varför tutar det upptaget inne hos piloten? ;-)
baxtrom 3 years ago
Masterwarning ;)
wrapmannen 3 years ago
Nice condence lines. ska börja på sweden aviation academy. Heja Sverige
flugkungen 3 years ago 4
F22 vs Gripen! Det Amerikanska planet F-22 Raptor har TVC (thrust vectoring control).
Har det bättre svängprestanda jämfört med Gripen? Är F-22 ett instabilt flygplan?
SgtDrDeath 3 years ago
Bra fluget av piloten. Eloge!
JAS är nog Sveriges sista stolthet.
Slamgurka 3 years ago
"JAS är nog Sveriges sista stolthet."
- Va?
Det händer faktiskt ganska mycket på ritborden och nere i vapensmedjorna.
Det finns anledning därtill.
Ryssarna hade chansen att bli en del av Europa på allvar efter sovjetdagarna kom till ända.
Men det verkar behövas åtminstone ett kallt krig till.
scholion 3 years ago 5
O.M.G. this is very great airplanes
odmetnik24 3 years ago 5
Gripen will be the real Eurofighter because it is so brutal and costeffective :-)
SgtDrDeath 3 years ago 3
I wciąż się zastanawiam dlaczego Polskie Siły Lotniczne nie zdecydowały się na tą maszynę?? Wg mnie lepiej byłoby mieć więcej nowszych i łatwiejszych w obsłudze i serwisie, i przede wszystkim nowszych maszyn od Szwedów...
Hjartliga halsningar fran Polen:)
mbakira 3 years ago
hello mate, greetings from sweden. I didnt understand you but who cares :)
Robfoxman 3 years ago