Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (72)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Damn Yankfags and their needless WTC failtalk.

  • No, obviously the conspiracy theorists are correct. It's plain that the government planted the hundreds of pounds explosives at critical points in three major office buildings in which thousands of people worked without any of those people noticing, even though it would have taken dozens of workmen months worth of loud, highly visible labor to do so. Anyone who sees a hole in this argument is a government stooge.

  • Nice Nice Video. I really loved your video. Youtube can be a great asset for you. If you need any help getting your video exposed, check out this site called tubeviews [dot net] It has really done wonders for me, I have built 3 Channels up with videos at top in position and this is my forth channel i'm going to working on.

    I like what i watched.

  • To all you ding dongs out there trying to compare this fire to WT7. Things to remember... THIS building was built in an earthquake zone. Therefore it was built to totally different standards. It was also built on a totally different design.

    The fire at WT7 showed the failing of the contractor and designers of the World Trade Center. Nothing more. You do not have to have a fire totally consume a building for it to collapse. All you need is a few main supports to give way.

  • Moron, the WTC building were the state of the art, there were no deficiencies in their design, furthermore, no steel framed building in history has ever collapsed due to fire. Get a life.....

  • PS. You completely ignore WTC building 7 - NO jets, no 'terrorists' - only a small fire YET the building collapses exactly like a demolition. Explain that. (Engineers can't ) Face it - LOOKS like a demolition IS a demolition. The building in this video burned fiercely all night and none of the steel portions collapsed - not even close. That's the point in comparing it to WCT7.

  • This is the TVCC building, sister building to the CCTV building designed by Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas and Ole Scheeren of OMA. Engineering is by ARUP.

  • Lol, now this is true HD! ...

  • THIS IS A KARMA!!!

  • Guys, this thing was built 30 years after the WTC, and to a third of the height. Perhaps they learned lessons about blown-on insulation. They probably didn't hang lightweight trusses over a wide area to provide column free space. Major supports were not cut by the impact of a plane before the fire. There is no comparison.

  • The TVCC has a huge central atrium (53 stories) - taller than WCT 7 (47 stories) and is covered by a steel space frame structure with huge diagonal steel bracing members on 2 sides. The cladding - titanium zinc alloy steel, which wraps around and over the entire building survived this all night inferno quite well. BTW. The WTC buildings WERE designed for jet impacts - not demolitions.

  • The WTC was designed for the accidental impact of a 707 at speeds common for that altitude. The terrorists were flying much larger jets, almost full of fuel, as fast as they could. The outer columns of the WTC were cut by the force of impact, plainly visible in vids, and I don't even know why I'm arguing about this because it's just silly.

  • The only thing silly is your 'argument'. The Boeing 767 is scaled up roughy 30% compared to a 707. The towers were designed to withstand even MULTIPLE plane strikes so your point is quite moot. The structure is a space-frame type so it doesn't matter if a small portion is damaged - loads are re-distributed.

  • If anyone still thinks that 9/11 wasn't a demolition job after watching this, they must be mentally ill.

  • This is a karma,for what they did to all Chinese.

  • BUDDY,U GOT THE TRUE!!!

  • The fucking building's burning like this and still didn't fall!

    How can 911 not be an inside job?

  • the world trade center were built during the 1960s this building is built in 2007, after 2001 9/11 all new chinese skyscraper had to stand fire to the 9/11 magnitude. beside burning and exploding are completely different .

  • Comment removed

  • USAF0314; WTC 7 had no explosion, even NIST explanation said as much. Fire only. Collapsed just the same...........

  • once again, WTC7 was built decades ago, you can not compare a building which was built so long ago to a modern skyscraper with strict fire codes.

  • HEY airforce guy take some pieces of any plane and chuck into fireplace or hell even hit with propane torch NO disintegration OK be happy eating McDonalds and getting that fucked up check yeah the same old Govt Devil one...for selling your soul to be with them!

  • did you even read what you wrote? it made no sense... and if you have nothing mature to say, dont say anything.

  • You have common sense. USAF is talking nonsense. NO steel building has collapsed due to fire in 100 years! On 9/11 THREE fall down at FREE FALL speed - that's demolition my friend. Note, the building in this video (the TVCC bldg. not it's sister bldg. CCTV) had no fire protection systems installed as yet. The fire in the WTC blgs were LOWER temperature (black smoke) and not fed oxygen through an open atrium like the TVCC building.

  • sorry to see that. One fireman dead in the fire

  • epic fail.

  • to indyfan22k: only the people don't know China will talk like you!!!

    if you don't know China, than just shut your mouth up!!

  • was anyone in the building?

  • Oh Chineese propoganda......

  • Chinese government is not very smart to let this happen, and still tries to hide its mess

  • to valken666: This is the accident, and the government never try to hide it!!!

  • It appears that they were not able to put out the fire, they just let is burn out? Do anyone know?

    That would make the structure weak and need to be torn down or may still collapse.

  • maybe they were busy evacuating

  • the building hasn't finished yet.

    the anti-fire part of the build hasn't installed

  • Karma.

  • The building caught fire just was the annexe of the Main Building. The losses cost about at least 2B yuan(300 million dollors),

  • hahahahaha so funny

  • why no report who do the firework. chinese lantern festival or not, someone must have light it. now one firefighter zhang jianyong dead, and no news of perpetrator.

  • 全中国人都知道了,还需要报道?

  • 我那个比你早的报道,都是从新闻上截下来的

  • Terrible fire...

  • foolish people ...

  • 违规燃放烟花酿祸 现场发现烟花弹

    消防人员在着火的配楼南面房檐上发现了一个200响和一个100­响的烟花弹。

    初步了解,火灾的过火面积10余万平方米,楼内十几层的中庭已经­坍塌,位于楼内南侧演播大厅的数字机房被烧毁。据了解,因为着火­的配楼与新建央视主楼相距仅200余米,现场指挥灭火的有关领导­和消防人员正在努力采取措施,以保护主体建筑不受损害。

  • 我也是看来的消息

    2人被困大楼14层获救

    7名参与救火的武警因烟熏等情况导致心肺损伤被送往朝阳医院等医­院,另有1名该工地项目经理因烟熏被送往中日友好医院.凌晨1时­30分,红庙消防中队指导员张建勇因救火受伤,抢救无效死亡。

  • wow, Al-Qaeda Taliban attacks China~

  • wut

  • This news had being reported by CCTV this morning,I Think someone will be punished!

  • 09022009

    Need I say more!!!!

  • 一群幸灾乐祸的北京人。。

  • 牛年还是比较火的 -_-!

  • 烧的是东方文华的钱,不过估计这个楼还能用,翻修呗,本来就没盖­好呢

  • is it a terrorism for  chinese government?

  • Comment removed

  • what happen to culture center? why not reported in news story? how big is building? what chinese government do now?

  • in fect chinese goverment won't be report this news, because that will be.....................

  • I live in Beijing. They did report the news cunt wad.

  • NYT:

    A directive sent out by propaganda officials, which found its way to the Internet after it was leaked, made clear that the authorities were eager to reduce public attention to the blaze, a colossal embarrassment that many people believe augurs poorly for the new year. No photos, no video clips, no in-depth reports, read the memo, which instructed all media outlets to use only Xinhua dispatches. The news should be put on news areas only and the comments posting areas should be closed.

  • Yeah same like Mythbraa they reported

  • The building was designed by OMA, which is a 234m, 52 floos building...It`s really huge...

  • 感谢党中央,感谢胡主席,感谢cctv,感谢广电总局,在正月十­五为广大人民群众献上一份厚礼!敬祝大家牛年 火 !火 !火! 谢谢

  • 消防救险系统的问题,烧的都是老百姓的税金

    只求没有人员伤亡

  • Beijing is HOT!

  • it should be 911 haha

  • consider the date

    9-1-9

  • can you further explain, please? is it something related to 9/11?

  • or because 9 is a fire element? in any case the date was 9-2-9

  • WTF??????

  • waaaauuuuuuuu ....

  • 我感觉这不是简单的问题。早上部分卫星电视没有信号,晚上出现这­个问题,不会仅仅是巧合

  • diablo ese edificio de television se esta q quema todo primera ves q veo un incendio asi !!!! dios los bendiga a los q han perdido la vida!!!

  • omg~~~ 应该没有人员伤亡吧

  • Big fire.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more