No, obviously the conspiracy theorists are correct. It's plain that the government planted the hundreds of pounds explosives at critical points in three major office buildings in which thousands of people worked without any of those people noticing, even though it would have taken dozens of workmen months worth of loud, highly visible labor to do so. Anyone who sees a hole in this argument is a government stooge.
Nice Nice Video. I really loved your video. Youtube can be a great asset for you. If you need any help getting your video exposed, check out this site called tubeviews [dot net] It has really done wonders for me, I have built 3 Channels up with videos at top in position and this is my forth channel i'm going to working on.
To all you ding dongs out there trying to compare this fire to WT7. Things to remember... THIS building was built in an earthquake zone. Therefore it was built to totally different standards. It was also built on a totally different design.
The fire at WT7 showed the failing of the contractor and designers of the World Trade Center. Nothing more. You do not have to have a fire totally consume a building for it to collapse. All you need is a few main supports to give way.
Moron, the WTC building were the state of the art, there were no deficiencies in their design, furthermore, no steel framed building in history has ever collapsed due to fire. Get a life.....
PS. You completely ignore WTC building 7 - NO jets, no 'terrorists' - only a small fire YET the building collapses exactly like a demolition. Explain that. (Engineers can't ) Face it - LOOKS like a demolition IS a demolition. The building in this video burned fiercely all night and none of the steel portions collapsed - not even close. That's the point in comparing it to WCT7.
This is the TVCC building, sister building to the CCTV building designed by Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas and Ole Scheeren of OMA. Engineering is by ARUP.
Guys, this thing was built 30 years after the WTC, and to a third of the height. Perhaps they learned lessons about blown-on insulation. They probably didn't hang lightweight trusses over a wide area to provide column free space. Major supports were not cut by the impact of a plane before the fire. There is no comparison.
The TVCC has a huge central atrium (53 stories) - taller than WCT 7 (47 stories) and is covered by a steel space frame structure with huge diagonal steel bracing members on 2 sides. The cladding - titanium zinc alloy steel, which wraps around and over the entire building survived this all night inferno quite well. BTW. The WTC buildings WERE designed for jet impacts - not demolitions.
The WTC was designed for the accidental impact of a 707 at speeds common for that altitude. The terrorists were flying much larger jets, almost full of fuel, as fast as they could. The outer columns of the WTC were cut by the force of impact, plainly visible in vids, and I don't even know why I'm arguing about this because it's just silly.
The only thing silly is your 'argument'. The Boeing 767 is scaled up roughy 30% compared to a 707. The towers were designed to withstand even MULTIPLE plane strikes so your point is quite moot. The structure is a space-frame type so it doesn't matter if a small portion is damaged - loads are re-distributed.
the world trade center were built during the 1960s this building is built in 2007, after 2001 9/11 all new chinese skyscraper had to stand fire to the 9/11 magnitude. beside burning and exploding are completely different .
HEY airforce guy take some pieces of any plane and chuck into fireplace or hell even hit with propane torch NO disintegration OK be happy eating McDonalds and getting that fucked up check yeah the same old Govt Devil one...for selling your soul to be with them!
You have common sense. USAF is talking nonsense. NO steel building has collapsed due to fire in 100 years! On 9/11 THREE fall down at FREE FALL speed - that's demolition my friend. Note, the building in this video (the TVCC bldg. not it's sister bldg. CCTV) had no fire protection systems installed as yet. The fire in the WTC blgs were LOWER temperature (black smoke) and not fed oxygen through an open atrium like the TVCC building.
why no report who do the firework. chinese lantern festival or not, someone must have light it. now one firefighter zhang jianyong dead, and no news of perpetrator.
A directive sent out by propaganda officials, which found its way to the Internet after it was leaked, made clear that the authorities were eager to reduce public attention to the blaze, a colossal embarrassment that many people believe augurs poorly for the new year. No photos, no video clips, no in-depth reports, read the memo, which instructed all media outlets to use only Xinhua dispatches. The news should be put on news areas only and the comments posting areas should be closed.
Damn Yankfags and their needless WTC failtalk.
MacraStraba 2 years ago
No, obviously the conspiracy theorists are correct. It's plain that the government planted the hundreds of pounds explosives at critical points in three major office buildings in which thousands of people worked without any of those people noticing, even though it would have taken dozens of workmen months worth of loud, highly visible labor to do so. Anyone who sees a hole in this argument is a government stooge.
Nergoil 2 years ago
Nice Nice Video. I really loved your video. Youtube can be a great asset for you. If you need any help getting your video exposed, check out this site called tubeviews [dot net] It has really done wonders for me, I have built 3 Channels up with videos at top in position and this is my forth channel i'm going to working on.
I like what i watched.
Brendanawr 2 years ago
To all you ding dongs out there trying to compare this fire to WT7. Things to remember... THIS building was built in an earthquake zone. Therefore it was built to totally different standards. It was also built on a totally different design.
The fire at WT7 showed the failing of the contractor and designers of the World Trade Center. Nothing more. You do not have to have a fire totally consume a building for it to collapse. All you need is a few main supports to give way.
ColeatEsani 2 years ago
Moron, the WTC building were the state of the art, there were no deficiencies in their design, furthermore, no steel framed building in history has ever collapsed due to fire. Get a life.....
tvlodek 2 years ago
PS. You completely ignore WTC building 7 - NO jets, no 'terrorists' - only a small fire YET the building collapses exactly like a demolition. Explain that. (Engineers can't ) Face it - LOOKS like a demolition IS a demolition. The building in this video burned fiercely all night and none of the steel portions collapsed - not even close. That's the point in comparing it to WCT7.
JimsBB123 2 years ago
This is the TVCC building, sister building to the CCTV building designed by Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas and Ole Scheeren of OMA. Engineering is by ARUP.
JimsBB123 2 years ago
Lol, now this is true HD! ...
SuzukiAkiraReita 2 years ago
THIS IS A KARMA!!!
garthsias 2 years ago
Guys, this thing was built 30 years after the WTC, and to a third of the height. Perhaps they learned lessons about blown-on insulation. They probably didn't hang lightweight trusses over a wide area to provide column free space. Major supports were not cut by the impact of a plane before the fire. There is no comparison.
istartedi 2 years ago
The TVCC has a huge central atrium (53 stories) - taller than WCT 7 (47 stories) and is covered by a steel space frame structure with huge diagonal steel bracing members on 2 sides. The cladding - titanium zinc alloy steel, which wraps around and over the entire building survived this all night inferno quite well. BTW. The WTC buildings WERE designed for jet impacts - not demolitions.
JimsBB123 2 years ago
The WTC was designed for the accidental impact of a 707 at speeds common for that altitude. The terrorists were flying much larger jets, almost full of fuel, as fast as they could. The outer columns of the WTC were cut by the force of impact, plainly visible in vids, and I don't even know why I'm arguing about this because it's just silly.
istartedi 2 years ago
The only thing silly is your 'argument'. The Boeing 767 is scaled up roughy 30% compared to a 707. The towers were designed to withstand even MULTIPLE plane strikes so your point is quite moot. The structure is a space-frame type so it doesn't matter if a small portion is damaged - loads are re-distributed.
JimsBB123 2 years ago
If anyone still thinks that 9/11 wasn't a demolition job after watching this, they must be mentally ill.
kaferere 2 years ago
This is a karma,for what they did to all Chinese.
SleepingSun1985 2 years ago
BUDDY,U GOT THE TRUE!!!
garthsias 2 years ago
The fucking building's burning like this and still didn't fall!
How can 911 not be an inside job?
nuklear666 2 years ago 2
the world trade center were built during the 1960s this building is built in 2007, after 2001 9/11 all new chinese skyscraper had to stand fire to the 9/11 magnitude. beside burning and exploding are completely different .
USAF0314 2 years ago
Comment removed
deskducker 2 years ago
USAF0314; WTC 7 had no explosion, even NIST explanation said as much. Fire only. Collapsed just the same...........
deskducker 2 years ago
once again, WTC7 was built decades ago, you can not compare a building which was built so long ago to a modern skyscraper with strict fire codes.
USAF0314 2 years ago
HEY airforce guy take some pieces of any plane and chuck into fireplace or hell even hit with propane torch NO disintegration OK be happy eating McDonalds and getting that fucked up check yeah the same old Govt Devil one...for selling your soul to be with them!
deltaalpha21074 2 years ago
did you even read what you wrote? it made no sense... and if you have nothing mature to say, dont say anything.
USAF0314 2 years ago
You have common sense. USAF is talking nonsense. NO steel building has collapsed due to fire in 100 years! On 9/11 THREE fall down at FREE FALL speed - that's demolition my friend. Note, the building in this video (the TVCC bldg. not it's sister bldg. CCTV) had no fire protection systems installed as yet. The fire in the WTC blgs were LOWER temperature (black smoke) and not fed oxygen through an open atrium like the TVCC building.
JimsBB123 2 years ago 2
sorry to see that. One fireman dead in the fire
penny5656 2 years ago
epic fail.
bluecobalt27 3 years ago
to indyfan22k: only the people don't know China will talk like you!!!
if you don't know China, than just shut your mouth up!!
rexmeng501 3 years ago
was anyone in the building?
clevelandjimsmith 3 years ago
Oh Chineese propoganda......
minieman14 3 years ago
Chinese government is not very smart to let this happen, and still tries to hide its mess
valken666 3 years ago
to valken666: This is the accident, and the government never try to hide it!!!
rexmeng501 3 years ago
It appears that they were not able to put out the fire, they just let is burn out? Do anyone know?
That would make the structure weak and need to be torn down or may still collapse.
whathitthefan 3 years ago
maybe they were busy evacuating
Haseo568 3 years ago
the building hasn't finished yet.
the anti-fire part of the build hasn't installed
ALiLvToT 2 years ago
Karma.
DanielForkbeard 3 years ago
The building caught fire just was the annexe of the Main Building. The losses cost about at least 2B yuan(300 million dollors),
TinyWormFromChina 3 years ago
hahahahaha so funny
ventadelastillero 3 years ago
why no report who do the firework. chinese lantern festival or not, someone must have light it. now one firefighter zhang jianyong dead, and no news of perpetrator.
threelegduck 3 years ago
全中国人都知道了,还需要报道?
wl2003sq 3 years ago
我那个比你早的报道,都是从新闻上截下来的
wl2003sq 3 years ago
Terrible fire...
EmperorChiCheung 3 years ago
foolish people ...
rochelimit55555 3 years ago
违规燃放烟花酿祸 现场发现烟花弹
消防人员在着火的配楼南面房檐上发现了一个200响和一个100响的烟花弹。
初步了解,火灾的过火面积10余万平方米,楼内十几层的中庭已经坍塌,位于楼内南侧演播大厅的数字机房被烧毁。据了解,因为着火的配楼与新建央视主楼相距仅200余米,现场指挥灭火的有关领导和消防人员正在努力采取措施,以保护主体建筑不受损害。
wl2003sq 3 years ago
我也是看来的消息
2人被困大楼14层获救
7名参与救火的武警因烟熏等情况导致心肺损伤被送往朝阳医院等医院,另有1名该工地项目经理因烟熏被送往中日友好医院.凌晨1时30分,红庙消防中队指导员张建勇因救火受伤,抢救无效死亡。
wl2003sq 3 years ago
wow, Al-Qaeda Taliban attacks China~
052053028 3 years ago
wut
timpedersen 3 years ago
This news had being reported by CCTV this morning,I Think someone will be punished!
caidagm 3 years ago
09022009
Need I say more!!!!
hoejgard 3 years ago
一群幸灾乐祸的北京人。。
ocean5281 3 years ago
牛年还是比较火的 -_-!
ca8879 3 years ago
烧的是东方文华的钱,不过估计这个楼还能用,翻修呗,本来就没盖好呢
wanghan12345 3 years ago
is it a terrorism for chinese government?
sekino5031 3 years ago
Comment removed
ypa83 3 years ago
what happen to culture center? why not reported in news story? how big is building? what chinese government do now?
threelegduck 3 years ago
in fect chinese goverment won't be report this news, because that will be.....................
caiqingji 3 years ago
I live in Beijing. They did report the news cunt wad.
Mythbraa 3 years ago
NYT:
A directive sent out by propaganda officials, which found its way to the Internet after it was leaked, made clear that the authorities were eager to reduce public attention to the blaze, a colossal embarrassment that many people believe augurs poorly for the new year. No photos, no video clips, no in-depth reports, read the memo, which instructed all media outlets to use only Xinhua dispatches. The news should be put on news areas only and the comments posting areas should be closed.
RICHUNCLEPENNYBAGS77 3 years ago
Yeah same like Mythbraa they reported
MrChk 3 years ago
The building was designed by OMA, which is a 234m, 52 floos building...It`s really huge...
zhaozhikun1987 3 years ago
感谢党中央,感谢胡主席,感谢cctv,感谢广电总局,在正月十五为广大人民群众献上一份厚礼!敬祝大家牛年 火 !火 !火! 谢谢
shadyliu 3 years ago
消防救险系统的问题,烧的都是老百姓的税金
只求没有人员伤亡
anonymousiam 3 years ago
Beijing is HOT!
cedrik2003 3 years ago
it should be 911 haha
cedrik2003 3 years ago
consider the date
9-1-9
LianKeqing 3 years ago
can you further explain, please? is it something related to 9/11?
tuturura 3 years ago
or because 9 is a fire element? in any case the date was 9-2-9
tuturura 3 years ago
WTF??????
AssMingMing 3 years ago
waaaauuuuuuuu ....
dnaerr 3 years ago
我感觉这不是简单的问题。早上部分卫星电视没有信号,晚上出现这个问题,不会仅仅是巧合
superarticulation 3 years ago
diablo ese edificio de television se esta q quema todo primera ves q veo un incendio asi !!!! dios los bendiga a los q han perdido la vida!!!
8MeMoOo8 3 years ago
omg~~~ 应该没有人员伤亡吧
imazcoke 3 years ago
Big fire.
OrderGrandMaster 3 years ago