Its unbelievable how the gays in the comments are flaring up, you know what's funny? it's people like those who give most considerate gays a terrible name in today's era. If this man feels gayness is a perversion so be it, nobody has a right to judge him as prejudice over that. Combustible gays always feel like they have to defend themselves when nobody is even attacking them and they only make life harder for anyone else who may happen to be gay.
Gay people don't fucking choose to be gay just like you don't choose to be straight. Why the fuck would God make them gay? Why why why? Can you think that way? Can you even fathom the idea that maybe God WANTS them to be gay and not LIE? What the fuck is wrong with loving someone else? Doesn't matter what's in their damn pants. How can you honestly think that God does not want gay people to love each other? There's man's law, then there is God's. And he teaches us how to live through our hearts.
@jumpyduck Its not about who to love... God loves all people no matter what! You can choose who you love right?... so being Gay is a choice as your choosing to give into a perversion of sex. Only recently has it become politically correct to accept homosexuality as normal, only because it is more common today. Does that mean we should accept polygamy (more then one partner in marriage) and beastiality (sex with or marriage to animals) No absolutely not.
@jumpyduck ...if thats all you have to say clearly your confused. Never once did I say God or I hate gay people. God hates sin not the person sinning. Even if you dont believe in God there is no logical reason to be gay the human race would not exist if it were not for strait people having sex and babies
@MyGhettoGospel And you think that's all life's about? Being logical and having babies? What about the women who can't get pregnant. They get by with love.
im gay, ive never been through trauma and ive never wanted to have sex with a donkey. i have loved and if God is love you called God a perversion. what you think abt gays is prejudice you just cant see it cuz you are prejudice.
Good say my friend , Also did you know homosexuality is demonic spirit I prayed for gay person he became straight , so also don't except them give them a exorcism , XD
@MyGhettoGospel I know, if God hated the sinner we all would be screwed , " also don't except them give them a exorcism , XD " when I say that I mean set them free , don't except that strong hold on them .
@HungarianForGOD i was gonna let it slide, but you did it twice, so quick correction.
"also don't except them give them a exorcism" it is supposed to be "also, don't ACCEPT them, give them AN exorcism" the first time i thought it to be honest mistake, 2nd time i had to say something, in case you're learning english.
next, why do you assume there is something wrong with homosexuality? did you ever consider it may be you that being unreasonable by expecting them to change?
@silljos1 Well , English is my 4 language so I may mess up once or twice , and I also can use a few more lessons , LOL . I do not assume I know there is , you see its not the persons choice . They have a lots of Principalities in there life which there a bondage to . I found out long ago that there is no natural cusses , and yes I know your an atheist so you really won't get my point . and no Lutheran dose not count .
@HungarianForGOD understandably so, english is not the easiest, so i do not bring up those mistakes as an insult.
yes i am an atheist, however i could as well be agnostic, which means if there is a god i don't think humans got the right idea of what he is yet.
oddly enough, i was raised strictly lutheran =] how did you guess? lol.
and i do get your point, i just disagree with it. i assume that because homosexuality occurs in nature, then it is normal, and for the most part, genetic.
@silljos1 That's good news , did you know God has been found tho , just the Churches Corrupted him , look at God this way he is a fun loving person who wants to be close to us , but he does have laws tho , but not all apply to us , like not to cut our self's( Piercings) or Tattoo them self's that don't apply to us , but he does have moral laws which are always the same , look the world this way it was made perfectly then has gotten corrupted so "normal" is not normal (PT 1 )
@silljos1 I know you were Lutheran because I have prophetic gifting and not just I also can Interpret dreams , and much more , I also most Atheist only know of the "Religious" Christians , go to " It's Supernatural " or type in Sid Roth you will learn more about it (PT2)
@HungarianForGOD i am open to the idea that there may be a god, however if there is one i don't think he would take much care in the spec of dust we call earth. if a god exists i find it unlikely that any faith on earth got his story right. then again, i think it's more probable that one doesn't exist, just my opinion.
and also... bull shit! XD haha. you did not know i was lutheran, that was a lucky guess at best. you can't convince me that people poses supernatural powers. sorry, =].
@silljos1 Believe it or not , people do have supernatural gifting , but it comes form God . Just check a few of these people out go to a conference or 2 if you see the supernatural then you know the truth if not then you can find out whats going on and use it in debate so you have nothing to loose . Think of it as an experiment . Unless you are afraid of what you will find ?
@silljos1 did'nt notice the conversation you guys were having till now, lol
I personaly believe God Literaly is "Love'... and love you can not know with any of the 5 human sences unless it takes on physical form...and I believe a perfect everlasting and uncondition love was shown through Jesus, and it should not all be about "religion' but having a "relationship' with God if you want to know him. (my views can be seen in my video titled "My YouTube purpose")-if interested
@rangauthier homosexuality is a perversion like any perversion...even a straight person who lusts and commits adultery is sinning, so dont think Im only pointing fingers at gays.
God does in fact love Everyone no matter who you are! The problem is ,he Hates Sin...and everyone sins even me! I personally have No problem other then the fact of taking the 'word Marriage' as 'Gay' originally meant Happy but was 'perverted' and 'changed' to now mean Homosexual, as with the rainbow and the color purple
@rangauthier you are being ignorant yourself for putting words in my mouth and assuming too much, based on steriotypes. Never once dint I say anything homophobic or racist ,hows is anything ive said offended you?
Im the one who should be offened, but Im not the type to hold a grudge...
If there is anything I can explain better then send me a personal inbox message
@MyGhettoGospel see that's wrong you did say something homophobic, you compared it to bestiality!!! that is extremely offensive to homosexuals and is therefore homophobic! how can you not see that?! how?!?!?!?!?!
This is absolutely ridiculous! for a second i even thought this was a joke. in your mind if gay people shouldn't marry because they can't procreate does that mean that straight couples that are sterile should be denied there right to marriage? and when you say that gays are stealing hetero's right of free speech.... what was that crap? further more, when you claim that homosexuality is unnatural, that is 100% false. there are other species that also mate with the same sex. your simply ignorant.
@silljos1 scientifically speaking 'not' personally.... what purpose do gays have if they can not procreate?
That part is not about marriage. Animal's can be perverted too never denied that.
Its more about gays changing the 'original meaning' of things the suit there own likes, and forcing to change others to compromise there ways to suit them... when instead they could have there own rights of there own
@MyGhettoGospel What are you talking about when you "scientifically"?! what scientific meaning to purpose are you referring to? they would have the same purpose as you if you were sterile or decided not to procreate! IT'S THAT SIMPLE! and another thing what "original meaning" are they stealing from you? the fact that you can't tie your argument of separate but equal rights to the practice of segregation leads me to believe that you are, as i said before, ignorant. and obviously prejudiced.
You are free to wear as much purple and rainbows as you like. If people think differently because of this, that is their problem, not your, and certainly not the problem or responsibility of homosexuals.
I'd be interested to know how you've established that 'marriage' is by neccessity, between a man & a woman. Even if we discount linguistic drift, I'd like to see any etymological basis for that claim.
Most all original history up untill recent years...have all defined marriage as between man and woman as ""a union between a man and a woman such that children born to the woman are the recognized legitimate offspring of both partners."-(The anthropological handbook Notes and Queries) English mariage, which first appears in 1250–1300 C.E. This in turn is derived from Old French marier (marry) and ultimately Latin marītāre (to marry) and marītus of marriage. SameSex+SameSex=no kid
@MyGhettoGospel Just because marriage has tradionally been between a man and a woman, that doesn't mean that that is what it 'is'.
I tried looking up the etymology as well. Not especially helpful. Although as far as I can tell, 'to marry' basically means 'to join', or 'wed' as in wedding does anyway. So no implication of gender requirements there. The ability to have kids doesn't come into it.
@PrettyMurky Lets put out of our minds all religious aspects and things of this world for a minute...
what then does science and logic say can come out of a same sex marriage, when they cant procreate and have children...If everyone on the planet was homosexual it would be the end of human existance, no more children!
@MyGhettoGospel Even if everyone went homosexual, a gay couple and a lesbian couple could get together to make babies. But I'll assume that you don't think that legalising gay marriage will make everyone else turn gay as well.
So seeing as there ARE babies who need adoptive parents, and that in my opinion, marriage is more about declaring one's love & commitment, & the lack of moral arguments against it, I really fail to see how anyone can have a reasonable objection.
@PrettyMurky your saying "gay" people would go strait for the sake of having a child?
see how its a "perversion" then?... Im not against humanity love and commitment is great, along with adoption! But lets say someone took you name now I dont know it, but for example 'John Smith' and people took your name and from now on they say "John Smith" now means to "not respect animals" now some would agree but the most not. And you take it personal cause its your Name being defined.
@MyGhettoGospel They wouldn't have to 'go straight', they'd just have to have sex until knocked up. They wouldn't have to enjoy it. People can be gay, yet marry the opposite sex & have children, they just feel they're living a lie.
As for changing what the word means, you'd have to establish that 'to marry' meant only between a man and a women, rather than simply 'to join'. And even if you did, language drifts gradually over time, although not from a name to a verb with no connection.
@MyGhettoGospel They'd only be 'living a lie' if they were pretending to be straight. I was just giving a solution to your absurd "what if everyone was gay?" question, ie. gays & lesbians could have sex for the purpose of procreation, then go their separate ways, each with children.
Yes, forcing gay people to pretend to be straight (as the Church often encourages) is rather perverse. Yes straight people can live together unmarried, yet gay people cannot live together married.
@PrettyMurky Ive never heard of a church that would encourage that! ...I agree with you 100% that that would be perverse. The only thing I see as a little unfair, is the changing of a traditional meaning.
I just think homosexuals should have there own word for marriage or civil union, thats all nothing more.
As for procreation even a athiest scientist would say that homosexuality is going against what nature intends.<- Im not saying that to be offensive...Im just trying to see the logic
@MyGhettoGospel We've already established that 'to marry' means 'to wed' or 'to join'.
Nothing about a man and a woman.
Nothing to do with making babies.
Making gays use a different word for marriage is no more justified than the Jim Crow laws. Ie. one group desparate to maintain the illusion of superiority over another.
@PrettyMurky I never said anything about superiority, dont put words in my mouth.
...well even if you don't define the word marriage as the traditional, thats just personal opinion and I have no problem with that. The biggest issue is forcing the church to marry homosexuals when it goes against everything they believe in. Traditionally a church marries people...and if a state or law can marry in another way fine!..but right now its like forcing a lactose intolerant person to drink milk!
@MyGhettoGospel I never said that you 'said' anything about superiority, and to be honest, I don't think that you personally thought it either. However I believer that that was the only justification for the Jim Crow laws, and a lot of the motivation for those who oppose gay marriage.
As for forcing churches to marry gay couples, I am against that. Churches are private businesses, however registary offices are state owned, and that is where gay marriage should be allowed.
@MyGhettoGospel The Jim Crow laws, were supposed to give blacks 'separate but equal' rights in the US between 1876 & 1965, but were basically legally enforced racism.
Here in the UK, the marriage technically begins not from the wedding ceremony, but from when the papers are signed, often in some civil offices. Also, churches can marry who they please, and are well within their rights to turn down, say a satanist couple, hetero or otherwise. So the same should apply to gay marriages.
I agree with you on how people who disagree with homosexuality are ostracized. I believe in the Bible, and people assume because I'm a Christian I AUTOMATICALLY hate gay people. I love them, and wish no harm to them. They're people, after all.
Of course He does love gays.
BBQFanNo1 3 months ago
if your gay..then your going to hell,simple as that
Naspst15 3 months ago
Its unbelievable how the gays in the comments are flaring up, you know what's funny? it's people like those who give most considerate gays a terrible name in today's era. If this man feels gayness is a perversion so be it, nobody has a right to judge him as prejudice over that. Combustible gays always feel like they have to defend themselves when nobody is even attacking them and they only make life harder for anyone else who may happen to be gay.
tylord55 5 months ago
Gay people don't fucking choose to be gay just like you don't choose to be straight. Why the fuck would God make them gay? Why why why? Can you think that way? Can you even fathom the idea that maybe God WANTS them to be gay and not LIE? What the fuck is wrong with loving someone else? Doesn't matter what's in their damn pants. How can you honestly think that God does not want gay people to love each other? There's man's law, then there is God's. And he teaches us how to live through our hearts.
jumpyduck 6 months ago
@jumpyduck Its not about who to love... God loves all people no matter what! You can choose who you love right?... so being Gay is a choice as your choosing to give into a perversion of sex. Only recently has it become politically correct to accept homosexuality as normal, only because it is more common today. Does that mean we should accept polygamy (more then one partner in marriage) and beastiality (sex with or marriage to animals) No absolutely not.
MyGhettoGospel 6 months ago
@MyGhettoGospel fuck you.
jumpyduck 6 months ago
@jumpyduck ...if thats all you have to say clearly your confused. Never once did I say God or I hate gay people. God hates sin not the person sinning. Even if you dont believe in God there is no logical reason to be gay the human race would not exist if it were not for strait people having sex and babies
MyGhettoGospel 5 months ago
@MyGhettoGospel And you think that's all life's about? Being logical and having babies? What about the women who can't get pregnant. They get by with love.
jumpyduck 5 months ago
@jumpyduck I dont disagree with you there , same for sterile men
MyGhettoGospel 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God loves everyone, but being gay strictly goes against him.
JakeEwing5 6 months ago
im gay, ive never been through trauma and ive never wanted to have sex with a donkey. i have loved and if God is love you called God a perversion. what you think abt gays is prejudice you just cant see it cuz you are prejudice.
91jgphonecall 7 months ago
@91jgphonecall Love a.k.a. "God" is not perverted, but ones opinion or thought about HIM could be...
And I can say by definition that Gays are "prejudice" about God and rights of the church, it works both ways...
Its not 'hate crime' here Im talking about, its equal rights on belief ,without force of making one do for another because of 'political correctness'
MyGhettoGospel 6 months ago
no
yougotmysnout 8 months ago
Good say my friend , Also did you know homosexuality is demonic spirit I prayed for gay person he became straight , so also don't except them give them a exorcism , XD
HungarianForGOD 9 months ago
@HungarianForGOD God hate's sin not the sinner, just remember that!
I dont condemn people...Im just making points of opinion without political correctness
MyGhettoGospel 9 months ago
@MyGhettoGospel I know, if God hated the sinner we all would be screwed , " also don't except them give them a exorcism , XD " when I say that I mean set them free , don't except that strong hold on them .
HungarianForGOD 9 months ago
@HungarianForGOD i was gonna let it slide, but you did it twice, so quick correction.
"also don't except them give them a exorcism" it is supposed to be "also, don't ACCEPT them, give them AN exorcism" the first time i thought it to be honest mistake, 2nd time i had to say something, in case you're learning english.
next, why do you assume there is something wrong with homosexuality? did you ever consider it may be you that being unreasonable by expecting them to change?
silljos1 8 months ago
@silljos1 Well , English is my 4 language so I may mess up once or twice , and I also can use a few more lessons , LOL . I do not assume I know there is , you see its not the persons choice . They have a lots of Principalities in there life which there a bondage to . I found out long ago that there is no natural cusses , and yes I know your an atheist so you really won't get my point . and no Lutheran dose not count .
HungarianForGOD 8 months ago
@HungarianForGOD understandably so, english is not the easiest, so i do not bring up those mistakes as an insult.
yes i am an atheist, however i could as well be agnostic, which means if there is a god i don't think humans got the right idea of what he is yet.
oddly enough, i was raised strictly lutheran =] how did you guess? lol.
and i do get your point, i just disagree with it. i assume that because homosexuality occurs in nature, then it is normal, and for the most part, genetic.
silljos1 8 months ago
@silljos1 That's good news , did you know God has been found tho , just the Churches Corrupted him , look at God this way he is a fun loving person who wants to be close to us , but he does have laws tho , but not all apply to us , like not to cut our self's( Piercings) or Tattoo them self's that don't apply to us , but he does have moral laws which are always the same , look the world this way it was made perfectly then has gotten corrupted so "normal" is not normal (PT 1 )
HungarianForGOD 8 months ago
@silljos1 I know you were Lutheran because I have prophetic gifting and not just I also can Interpret dreams , and much more , I also most Atheist only know of the "Religious" Christians , go to " It's Supernatural " or type in Sid Roth you will learn more about it (PT2)
HungarianForGOD 8 months ago
@HungarianForGOD i am open to the idea that there may be a god, however if there is one i don't think he would take much care in the spec of dust we call earth. if a god exists i find it unlikely that any faith on earth got his story right. then again, i think it's more probable that one doesn't exist, just my opinion.
and also... bull shit! XD haha. you did not know i was lutheran, that was a lucky guess at best. you can't convince me that people poses supernatural powers. sorry, =].
silljos1 8 months ago
@silljos1 Believe it or not , people do have supernatural gifting , but it comes form God . Just check a few of these people out go to a conference or 2 if you see the supernatural then you know the truth if not then you can find out whats going on and use it in debate so you have nothing to loose . Think of it as an experiment . Unless you are afraid of what you will find ?
HungarianForGOD 8 months ago
@silljos1 did'nt notice the conversation you guys were having till now, lol
I personaly believe God Literaly is "Love'... and love you can not know with any of the 5 human sences unless it takes on physical form...and I believe a perfect everlasting and uncondition love was shown through Jesus, and it should not all be about "religion' but having a "relationship' with God if you want to know him. (my views can be seen in my video titled "My YouTube purpose")-if interested
MyGhettoGospel 8 months ago
@rangauthier I dont disagree with you there!
MyGhettoGospel 9 months ago
@rangauthier homosexuality is a perversion like any perversion...even a straight person who lusts and commits adultery is sinning, so dont think Im only pointing fingers at gays.
God does in fact love Everyone no matter who you are! The problem is ,he Hates Sin...and everyone sins even me! I personally have No problem other then the fact of taking the 'word Marriage' as 'Gay' originally meant Happy but was 'perverted' and 'changed' to now mean Homosexual, as with the rainbow and the color purple
MyGhettoGospel 9 months ago
@rangauthier you are being ignorant yourself for putting words in my mouth and assuming too much, based on steriotypes. Never once dint I say anything homophobic or racist ,hows is anything ive said offended you?
Im the one who should be offened, but Im not the type to hold a grudge...
If there is anything I can explain better then send me a personal inbox message
MyGhettoGospel 9 months ago
@MyGhettoGospel see that's wrong you did say something homophobic, you compared it to bestiality!!! that is extremely offensive to homosexuals and is therefore homophobic! how can you not see that?! how?!?!?!?!?!
silljos1 9 months ago
@silljos1 I could say the same thing about 'Incest or 'Polygamy or 'Beastiality or Countless others...
they are all form's of Sexual Perversion!
Same thing goes for Straight People who cheat and do any other Adulterous things! So its not homophobic at all, its anything-perverse-phobic lol
MyGhettoGospel 9 months ago
This is absolutely ridiculous! for a second i even thought this was a joke. in your mind if gay people shouldn't marry because they can't procreate does that mean that straight couples that are sterile should be denied there right to marriage? and when you say that gays are stealing hetero's right of free speech.... what was that crap? further more, when you claim that homosexuality is unnatural, that is 100% false. there are other species that also mate with the same sex. your simply ignorant.
silljos1 10 months ago
@silljos1 scientifically speaking 'not' personally.... what purpose do gays have if they can not procreate?
That part is not about marriage. Animal's can be perverted too never denied that.
Its more about gays changing the 'original meaning' of things the suit there own likes, and forcing to change others to compromise there ways to suit them... when instead they could have there own rights of there own
MyGhettoGospel 10 months ago
@MyGhettoGospel What are you talking about when you "scientifically"?! what scientific meaning to purpose are you referring to? they would have the same purpose as you if you were sterile or decided not to procreate! IT'S THAT SIMPLE! and another thing what "original meaning" are they stealing from you? the fact that you can't tie your argument of separate but equal rights to the practice of segregation leads me to believe that you are, as i said before, ignorant. and obviously prejudiced.
silljos1 10 months ago
You are free to wear as much purple and rainbows as you like. If people think differently because of this, that is their problem, not your, and certainly not the problem or responsibility of homosexuals.
I'd be interested to know how you've established that 'marriage' is by neccessity, between a man & a woman. Even if we discount linguistic drift, I'd like to see any etymological basis for that claim.
PrettyMurky 1 year ago
Most all original history up untill recent years...have all defined marriage as between man and woman as ""a union between a man and a woman such that children born to the woman are the recognized legitimate offspring of both partners."-(The anthropological handbook Notes and Queries) English mariage, which first appears in 1250–1300 C.E. This in turn is derived from Old French marier (marry) and ultimately Latin marītāre (to marry) and marītus of marriage. SameSex+SameSex=no kid
MyGhettoGospel 1 year ago
@MyGhettoGospel Just because marriage has tradionally been between a man and a woman, that doesn't mean that that is what it 'is'.
I tried looking up the etymology as well. Not especially helpful. Although as far as I can tell, 'to marry' basically means 'to join', or 'wed' as in wedding does anyway. So no implication of gender requirements there. The ability to have kids doesn't come into it.
PrettyMurky 1 year ago
@PrettyMurky Lets put out of our minds all religious aspects and things of this world for a minute...
what then does science and logic say can come out of a same sex marriage, when they cant procreate and have children...If everyone on the planet was homosexual it would be the end of human existance, no more children!
MyGhettoGospel 1 year ago
@MyGhettoGospel In reverse order:
Having children is not the only reason for doing anything.
No one is demanding compulsary gayness for all.
Even if they were, people could reproduce artificially, or simply through a gay & lesbian couple hooking up, & having sex (enjoymeny unneccessary).
Marriage allows couples to get parentel recogniton for unconventionally conceived kids, & adopt the many kids with no parents, gay or straight.
Plus marriage is a public declaration of commitment.
PrettyMurky 1 year ago
@PrettyMurky I get what your saying...Its just personal preference I guess.
20 years ago it would be samefull to have children before marriage and you would be looked at as a whore
and disgraced by your family, but its the everyday normal thing today.
But without strait people's mess ups, there wouldnt even be babies for gays to even adopt.
MyGhettoGospel 1 year ago
@MyGhettoGospel Even if everyone went homosexual, a gay couple and a lesbian couple could get together to make babies. But I'll assume that you don't think that legalising gay marriage will make everyone else turn gay as well.
So seeing as there ARE babies who need adoptive parents, and that in my opinion, marriage is more about declaring one's love & commitment, & the lack of moral arguments against it, I really fail to see how anyone can have a reasonable objection.
PrettyMurky 1 year ago
@PrettyMurky your saying "gay" people would go strait for the sake of having a child?
see how its a "perversion" then?... Im not against humanity love and commitment is great, along with adoption! But lets say someone took you name now I dont know it, but for example 'John Smith' and people took your name and from now on they say "John Smith" now means to "not respect animals" now some would agree but the most not. And you take it personal cause its your Name being defined.
same with marriage
MyGhettoGospel 1 year ago
@MyGhettoGospel They wouldn't have to 'go straight', they'd just have to have sex until knocked up. They wouldn't have to enjoy it. People can be gay, yet marry the opposite sex & have children, they just feel they're living a lie.
As for changing what the word means, you'd have to establish that 'to marry' meant only between a man and a women, rather than simply 'to join'. And even if you did, language drifts gradually over time, although not from a name to a verb with no connection.
PrettyMurky 1 year ago
@PrettyMurky ...and then why would a gay person want to live a lie?
thats why its a 'perversion' ...even with strait people who are not married but still live together its called
a "civil union" not marriage!
MyGhettoGospel 1 year ago
@MyGhettoGospel They'd only be 'living a lie' if they were pretending to be straight. I was just giving a solution to your absurd "what if everyone was gay?" question, ie. gays & lesbians could have sex for the purpose of procreation, then go their separate ways, each with children.
Yes, forcing gay people to pretend to be straight (as the Church often encourages) is rather perverse. Yes straight people can live together unmarried, yet gay people cannot live together married.
PrettyMurky 1 year ago
@PrettyMurky Ive never heard of a church that would encourage that! ...I agree with you 100% that that would be perverse. The only thing I see as a little unfair, is the changing of a traditional meaning.
I just think homosexuals should have there own word for marriage or civil union, thats all nothing more.
As for procreation even a athiest scientist would say that homosexuality is going against what nature intends.<- Im not saying that to be offensive...Im just trying to see the logic
MyGhettoGospel 1 year ago
@MyGhettoGospel We've already established that 'to marry' means 'to wed' or 'to join'.
Nothing about a man and a woman.
Nothing to do with making babies.
Making gays use a different word for marriage is no more justified than the Jim Crow laws. Ie. one group desparate to maintain the illusion of superiority over another.
PrettyMurky 1 year ago
@PrettyMurky I never said anything about superiority, dont put words in my mouth.
...well even if you don't define the word marriage as the traditional, thats just personal opinion and I have no problem with that. The biggest issue is forcing the church to marry homosexuals when it goes against everything they believe in. Traditionally a church marries people...and if a state or law can marry in another way fine!..but right now its like forcing a lactose intolerant person to drink milk!
MyGhettoGospel 1 year ago
@MyGhettoGospel I never said that you 'said' anything about superiority, and to be honest, I don't think that you personally thought it either. However I believer that that was the only justification for the Jim Crow laws, and a lot of the motivation for those who oppose gay marriage.
As for forcing churches to marry gay couples, I am against that. Churches are private businesses, however registary offices are state owned, and that is where gay marriage should be allowed.
PrettyMurky 1 year ago
@PrettyMurky I agree. everyone has rights. Im not familiar with jim crow laws, ive never heard of it...
Im not sure what the laws are where you live. I live in canada to it may be a little different. but I agree with you
MyGhettoGospel 1 year ago
@MyGhettoGospel The Jim Crow laws, were supposed to give blacks 'separate but equal' rights in the US between 1876 & 1965, but were basically legally enforced racism.
Here in the UK, the marriage technically begins not from the wedding ceremony, but from when the papers are signed, often in some civil offices. Also, churches can marry who they please, and are well within their rights to turn down, say a satanist couple, hetero or otherwise. So the same should apply to gay marriages.
PrettyMurky 1 year ago
I agree with you on how people who disagree with homosexuality are ostracized. I believe in the Bible, and people assume because I'm a Christian I AUTOMATICALLY hate gay people. I love them, and wish no harm to them. They're people, after all.
SupremeEliteTai 1 year ago
@SupremeEliteTai Amen. thanks for the comment
MyGhettoGospel 1 year ago