only those who participated in liveconcerts of Horowitz can imagin the atmosphere Horowitz created. He was unique. Public hardly did breath so much there was concentration. You could hear a fly so quiet people where.
I remeber the big silence in London followed by an outbreak of cry when Horowitz entered the stage. all did stand up silent and that silence was the most overwhelmingly silence I ever heard.....
This clip perfectly illustrates the astonishing range of Horowitz . Playing like a demon in the Scriabin then with heaven - like poetry and delicacy in the Schumann.
@ValdemarDragunov Horowitz's 1986 Moscow performance surpasses this :-)) And he also did Scriabin 2/1. That concert - every one of his concerts over 1985 and 1986 (when he was 82-83 yrs old) - is IMO the high-point of his legacy, when his sensitivity and artistry was surreal, and he had not lost any technique. Just an extraordinary pianist!
@Bret6464 Please - he had a lot to offer as he aged but to say that he played this in his 80's the way he does here is just not true-it was obvious in his choice of repertory-his new love of Mozart-aging is part of life-he retained amazing technique late in life-but the Horowitz here-or in that period in the 40's was the high water mark of a kind of super human virtuosity that he possessed
@Labienus I think Horowitz was exactly how you define him - a superhuman virtuoso, all of his life (there were times when he was ill).
Still, to me the greatest Horowitz concert is the 1986 Moscow, because he played with surreal artistry, he absolutely "created" not just "performed". Question of preference for style and pianism :-) Listen to Rachmaninoff's Chopin Sonata 2 (and everything else performed by Rach) and Gilels' Beethoven Moonlight sonata (and his Rach, Chopin)
@Bret6464 Imay have replied tothe wrong person while Ishare many of your feelings abouthis artistryIjust don'tfeel that has later versions are on the same level (thought no oneplays Scriabin better) &despite the hostoric and emotional nature of theMoscow recital-does it represent his best playing? I think there are individual works(usually less taxing technically) that were marvelous in later yrs.particularly the last recordings-his technique was however formidable to the end
The thing that never ceases to amaze me about watching and/or listening to Horowitz play is the astonishing level of control he has over the tone of his instrument. It's not so much that his musical interpretation is so superior to that of others (although in Scriabin I feel this often is the case) but that his ability to bring that musical idea to fruition and communicate it so directly that made Horowitz so special.
Horowotz never ceases to move and astonish me. He commands such a vast array of moods, dynamism ranging from almost brural force to delicate tenderness, vivid brilliance and sublety, depth and richness.
I second the comment that if you have never "seen" him play, this represents what made him unique, and captures the sheer, frightening electricity that seemed to possess him. He would continue playing the etude almost to the end, but this captures him when he was still physically in his prime. This is not a normal nervous system.
I don't know that i agree that he doesn't engage shoulders, his method flowed energy through the body, and the perfect point of striking the key was there.
I actually bothered to look-out of curiosity- what comment about Horowitz I made 2 yrs. ago would evoke such an articulate response. Now I see it's just a childish Internet creature.
This is the perfect video of Horowitz, particularly if someone has not seen him before. No one has ever played that Scriabin Etude any better--it is astounding how he gets such sound without engaging the shoulder at all! The Schumann is exquisitely crafted and disproves, once and for all, the notion that this genius could only play loud and fast.
He can really summon a beast from the piano when he plays the Scriabin. It sounds evil, demonic, perhaps apocalyptic! I agree with you 100% on Horowitz's skill to produce an unmatched sound.
favorite piece, favorite performance of said piece.
bourbonchrist 1 day ago
Unmatched technique and superior musicality. Simply a genius.
xcomposerpianistx 1 month ago
Sure wish I were there! SUBLIME!
Barb Todres/NYC
lovingee1 1 month ago
only those who participated in liveconcerts of Horowitz can imagin the atmosphere Horowitz created. He was unique. Public hardly did breath so much there was concentration. You could hear a fly so quiet people where.
I remeber the big silence in London followed by an outbreak of cry when Horowitz entered the stage. all did stand up silent and that silence was the most overwhelmingly silence I ever heard.....
uhartchristian 5 months ago
Bravo!!!
MrMrMikayel 5 months ago
Scriabin stole his whole work to Pipeik Chipolateik
mrcelada 6 months ago
This clip perfectly illustrates the astonishing range of Horowitz . Playing like a demon in the Scriabin then with heaven - like poetry and delicacy in the Schumann.
meredith218461 7 months ago
There is no better performance of this etude .
ValdemarDragunov 10 months ago
@ValdemarDragunov Horowitz's 1986 Moscow performance surpasses this :-)) And he also did Scriabin 2/1. That concert - every one of his concerts over 1985 and 1986 (when he was 82-83 yrs old) - is IMO the high-point of his legacy, when his sensitivity and artistry was surreal, and he had not lost any technique. Just an extraordinary pianist!
Bret6464 3 months ago
@Bret6464 Please - he had a lot to offer as he aged but to say that he played this in his 80's the way he does here is just not true-it was obvious in his choice of repertory-his new love of Mozart-aging is part of life-he retained amazing technique late in life-but the Horowitz here-or in that period in the 40's was the high water mark of a kind of super human virtuosity that he possessed
Labienus 2 months ago in playlist favs
@Labienus I think Horowitz was exactly how you define him - a superhuman virtuoso, all of his life (there were times when he was ill).
Still, to me the greatest Horowitz concert is the 1986 Moscow, because he played with surreal artistry, he absolutely "created" not just "performed". Question of preference for style and pianism :-) Listen to Rachmaninoff's Chopin Sonata 2 (and everything else performed by Rach) and Gilels' Beethoven Moonlight sonata (and his Rach, Chopin)
Bret6464 2 months ago
@Bret6464 Imay have replied tothe wrong person while Ishare many of your feelings abouthis artistryIjust don'tfeel that has later versions are on the same level (thought no oneplays Scriabin better) &despite the hostoric and emotional nature of theMoscow recital-does it represent his best playing? I think there are individual works(usually less taxing technically) that were marvelous in later yrs.particularly the last recordings-his technique was however formidable to the end
Labienus 2 months ago
God who is playing the piano
Ippocratedicos 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ippocratedicos 1 year ago
The thing that never ceases to amaze me about watching and/or listening to Horowitz play is the astonishing level of control he has over the tone of his instrument. It's not so much that his musical interpretation is so superior to that of others (although in Scriabin I feel this often is the case) but that his ability to bring that musical idea to fruition and communicate it so directly that made Horowitz so special.
pianoashmead 1 year ago
Pure genius!
MsAdri57 1 year ago
Horowotz never ceases to move and astonish me. He commands such a vast array of moods, dynamism ranging from almost brural force to delicate tenderness, vivid brilliance and sublety, depth and richness.
buttsmellr 1 year ago
ah!
richclayderman 1 year ago
Horowitz forever...!!
dido93 1 year ago
ke skifo di video
rubenippo94 2 years ago
se lei e pazza si curi!!!!!!!!!!!! o si rinkuida in un manikomio
rubenippo94 2 years ago
i like the one where he played at an older age better.. it doesnt sound as rushed here and is a lot easier to listen to
xc0ntaminated 2 years ago 3
the best play!
lllccc19820 2 years ago 3
Between these two pieces...it rather says it all...he was born to make me happy.
PhilPhilUSA 2 years ago 2
He was born to make US happy.
suellio 2 years ago
whats with the 4 thumbs down on your comment? god people are retarded
Classicmozayful 2 years ago
1.46 to 1.54 ,impressive ,an hurricane
miliona1re 3 years ago 7
I second the comment that if you have never "seen" him play, this represents what made him unique, and captures the sheer, frightening electricity that seemed to possess him. He would continue playing the etude almost to the end, but this captures him when he was still physically in his prime. This is not a normal nervous system.
I don't know that i agree that he doesn't engage shoulders, his method flowed energy through the body, and the perfect point of striking the key was there.
Labienus 3 years ago 19
@Labienus fuck you
Amadeus9933 6 months ago
@Amadeus9933
I actually bothered to look-out of curiosity- what comment about Horowitz I made 2 yrs. ago would evoke such an articulate response. Now I see it's just a childish Internet creature.
Labienus 6 months ago
@Labienus Curiosity killed the cat, now get out
impishmiss 6 months ago
omg i honosotly love the sound of his piano, its like a mellow sound. a sound of a voice
spike2133876 3 years ago 5
I think it's more the quality of the reording than the piano, but it's really beatiful.
JakaAce 2 years ago
This is one of those pieces of Horowitz that speaks for itself
ajayajath 3 years ago 4
This is the perfect video of Horowitz, particularly if someone has not seen him before. No one has ever played that Scriabin Etude any better--it is astounding how he gets such sound without engaging the shoulder at all! The Schumann is exquisitely crafted and disproves, once and for all, the notion that this genius could only play loud and fast.
dmitrop 4 years ago 27
He can really summon a beast from the piano when he plays the Scriabin. It sounds evil, demonic, perhaps apocalyptic! I agree with you 100% on Horowitz's skill to produce an unmatched sound.
revorrah 3 years ago 10
@dmitrop I whole-heartedly agree, although nobody who's heard his interpretations of Scarlatti would dare accuse him of such a thing!
theicyridge 9 months ago
@dmitrop amzing idiot you are talking about the shoulders.
but Shumman you are right.
eolanden 6 months ago