The Mystery of the Missing Mass

[bahdah1234]

two objects will appear to weigh more when they are close to each other much like when you put two magnets together. this could account for the missing mass.

[tahkevin]

Well, it has just been solved, by some 22year old chick working on her undergrad degree, . . . . how about 'em apples!

[hieulch]

cienceDaily (May 24, 2011) — A Monash student has made a breakthrough in the field of astrophysics, discovering what has until now been described as the Universe's 'missing mass'. Amelia Fraser-McKelvie, working within a team at the Monash School of Physics, conducted a targeted X-ray search for the matter and within just three months found it -- or at least some of it.

[anshulkamboj]

i dont when this collider will work

[ancientwisdom2012]

I think the best explanation to the "mystery" of Dark matter/Energy is given by Nassim Haramien. First of all, Einstein's field equations do NOT include rotation. If you adjust for rotational energy, you make up for the missing mass/energy of the universe! Check out his lecture here:

alienmates(dot) byethost14(dot) com/eventhorizon(dot) html

and here for his official site and scientific papers that have been published:

theresonanceproject(dot) org

[gaynorglowellxsingh]

I have a question. Their seems to be a lot of mass thats missing from our universe. We look for all of the possable ways that could explain it. Isin't radiation mass, it's accelerated protons, neutrons, electrons, photons and maby even down to the quantum level. Do we calculate this as mass in the missing mass theory. see my video about dark matter.

[memilybaldwin]

i love her voice too1

[elpicos8091]

its dark materrrrr not dark mataah lol

[xlightwavex]

einstien said that

gravity was produced by mass

as waves much like light

as these wave's travel they distort spacetime (which is a hard concept to envision)

e=mc2 is saying that mass and light are two forms of the same thing energy

ie 1 mass X the speed of light multiplyed by itself contains c2 energy within 1 second

since c is measured in a duration of time equivelent to 1 second

[LuisRamirez666]

dark matter is what we know now as the antimatter ?? somebody explain please

[Tartrus1]

No, it can't be. We can observe antimatter. And even if it was antimatter then they would not have to do the experiment at the LHC. The experiment I am referring to will try to see how matter prevailed over antimatter at the beginning of the universe.

[warkidplus]

@LuisRamirez666 look antimatter is the - to our+ and darkmatter is nothing absolutly nothing but this "thing" holds everything together and since we cant see, touch, hear, feel or tasteit dosent exist right? wrong!, you can see darkmatter as nothing just blackness in space comprende?

[JoachimderZweite]

I love her voice - clear, beautiful, like a bell in dawn.

[soldersucker]

From what I understand she works at CERN to "please" the physicists. They have to get laid some how....

[Toudiyama]

It took sometime for me to even understand einsteins relativity, it took a good illutration, the quantum theory I only get half of it, mainly because the ilustration of it did not make any sense.

However I do not let my understanding of it stand in the was of the trust I have in it, heck I don't know anything about medicines but I trust my doctor anyway

[silentonall]

It means everything, according to Quantum Physics, has a reference point! There is nothing in the whole universe that is truly analog. Everything is digital or 'quanta'! In the physical world, nothing travels as physical/continuous waves. Only Quantum Physics is STILL in infancy. It still cannot measure complementary values as position and momentum at the same exact time. Even the very measurement can disturb the outcome of the Planck Particles!

[Toudiyama]

You seem like an intelligent person that, like Newton, has come to a point where he can no longer comprihend, in Newtons case it took many years before others took it up where he stopped.

In your case you chose to dismiss science instead of accepting thatt some science is just to freakingly complex to understand without proper study

[silentonall]

Me intelligent? I wish! Naaah. Isaac Newton was a major pioneer for modern science. A personal hero to me to this day...

I never stated to 'dismiss' science, only that I used to like it. Recently, have you ever worked in a lab or a government complex where you were told that you can only continue your work under certain conditions?....where you have to sign forms and affidavits? To me, personally, THAT is stupid. Is that science?

[Toudiyama]

I am in no position to say if it is science or not but I do think it doesn't reflect on science itself how institutions use it or better restrict it.

it is not the science that is stupid but the institution

The only thing that stopped Newton was his imagination

[silentonall]

Could you agree that death stopped Newton's imagination?

My point is that scientific institutions within the U.S. are being limited in their ability to 'imagine' beyond that which their imaginations will take them! (get my drift?) :(

[Toudiyama]

I agree his imagination only stopped at his death but it was the fact that he could not imagine certain thing not being the work of a god that prevented him from being en even grater scientist than he already was

Isn't the sentence 'imagine' beyond that which their imaginations will take them" a bit impossible?

[silentonall]

I used to like science, then it got stupid. Very stupid.

[Toudiyama]

you mean then your religous feelings got in the way of using your mind

[silentonall]

Feelings?.....

Just keep dancing in your stupidity.

[Toudiyama]

yeah like calling science stupid is a sign of your "higher" intelligence.

[silentonall]

Science fascinated me for many years. When I started to study it further, it became ignorant. In the year 1900, Max Planck, who discovered the 'Planck Particle' per se, was ridiculed until Einstein defined Max's theory as correct in 1902 with the Photoelectric Effect. In 2004, Planck's suggestion was proven as this - Time stops at 10(- 43)sec and length stops at 10(- 33)cm. It suggests everything in the universe can be referenced.

[IbnAlla]

Maybe.

I`ll check on the subject.

It may take some time; you`ll hear from me.

[IbnAlla]

I`ve also read prints and not just watched U2b one time to have build up my opinion. Since decades scientific papers. I`m not the only one but even much more credible people on this subject deny the existence of dark matter. If nothing gets lost in the universe, why gravity should? And in cases of suns for instance matter CAN radiate into energy. If it would happen to all the matter, gravity is gone??? I doubt it! And energy passing by is then undetectable like dark. It`s logic!

[IbnAlla]

What a stupid assertion!

If anyone really would have found dark matter it had to be the nobel prize award.

I bet you can`t proof your claim.

Who found dark matter, when, and where?

I don`t remember to have read or heard about this discovery anywhere.

I`m sure you only will tell me again what an expert you are but will not cite any source.

But of course (yesYes,I understand) you don`t need to tell me because I`m too stupid .....

...yesYes...but fact:you`ll not cite any source!

[IbnAlla]

You mean anti matter!?

Dark matter doesn`t exist!

[IbnAlla]

Whatever,

but energy is equivalent to mass,

which logically means that any form of energy must also cause gravitation.

If a sun is burst into energy does it mean the former mass caused gravity is lost?

I doubt it.

Many times before "very clever" so called experts were wrong!

When at the end a sun radiates into energy would the circling planets actually have to drift away.

BUT THEY DON`T!

Do your jobs logically.

[namelesszk]

e= plus or minus mc^2

if you say mass causes gravitation, then shouldn't lack of mass cause lack of gravity.

to every up there is a down to light is its absence, and to all knowledge there is ignorance and vice versa.

[IbnAlla]

Look, E=mc2

Means=light/energy is equivalent to mass!

Mass causes gravitation.

And now:

We have no means to detect light which already past us. Or any ray of energy.

This rays which past us is obviously plenty.

It`s so called dark matter!

Because E=mc2, light and other energy rays also cause gravitational effects.

Which means:

The present idea of dark matter is BULLSHIT!!!

[sammywilloe]

Your an idiot, why don't you actually research shit your going to talk about. The electromagnetic radiation rays don't produce mass.

[IbnAlla]

If all the matter in the universe radiates would gravitational effects disappear? And anyway, even light is a wave AND A PARTICLE. And logically, particles have a mass. And as we know of the string theory, mass is just a wave of energy. I just try to take E=mc2 logically. Yes, I know, they didn`t teach you in school yet, so it can`t be. Dark matter doesn`t exist!

[IbnAlla]

I didn`t say that radiation produces mass.

Can`t you even read?

I said it must cause gravity!

E=mc2 and nothing is lost in the universe.

Einstein said.

[jbrun009]

All this dark matter/anti matter stuff has never made sense to me. I've watched tons of videos on the subject. Is she saying that the vaccuum of space is actually composed of dark matter?

[jordansamhuri]

I think that every school on the Planet must show this to their students. Until humanity starts to be enlightened to learn this instead of Bible and creation stories nonsense, we have no hope. This is so much more fascinating to the young and fresh minds of children than the parting of the Red Sea or of Noah's daughters getting him drunk and sleeping with their father, or other such similar poison to the brains of the young !

[micah1116]

@jordansamhuri Tell me, why is it more logical to believe that the universe created itself from nothing and that invisible matter that we have never detected a single particle of, is more logical, than the belief in God? Please enlighten us.

[PrinceMio49]

Read carefully, there will be a test later.

Ok, we have neutrons, protrons and electrons, (are you with me so far), from some of the posts I've read below, we have too many morons.

[koolyoh213]

lets look back at the history where modern science ruled out the presence of a medium or the material "aether", i think these will answer all the questions we'r looking for.

[exDeathex]

Scientists and their fucking theories, 10 years from now we'll probably have triple the amount of theories with no answers yet...

[robinmadden]

I'm not sure they will find "Super Symmetry". They will probably find more unanswered mathematical problems. Time probably exists because the equation cannot be solved and therefore it continues.

[Schutzstaffel23]

lol

[Sciencefilms]

They're pretty sure that Dark Matter exists. So yes, they are "trying to find it", as you say.

[draakmanz]

@Sciencefilms they dont find it nowhere near in space, maybe find it but not touch it, they will create it here on earth

[MortallicA91]

i need more video!!! :)

i wish this was longer...

but wow... we didnt find the end of something but we found the begining of something else...

my english is not good... I didnt understand, is she saying that this black matter exists? or they try to find if it exists?

[SeaSpider05]

Dark matter is likely just the modern-day version of Aristotle's ether.

[ScarSymmetric]

but doesn't the theory of relativity basically make gravity like the ether?

well, like a field anyway

i like super symmetry though, i'm sure if they find a whole new part of the universe everything will be bloody hard to understand again :P

more so even

[SeaSpider05]

hmmm...

[SeaSpider05]

Dark matter is the equivalent of Aristotle's ether...

[MERCENARIE]

This "Large Hadron Collider" is going to divide by zero and in doing this will create a black hole. If a black hole is made the earth and the human race will be destroyed.

In the name of science we destroy human excistance

[dkbmx85]

incorrect

[ScarSymmetric]

they want to make a miniature black hole

their more worried about everything being converted into some unstable particles.

hardly gonna happen, and in the name of science, i'm willing to risk it

[exDeathex]

Correct.

[PhilCook44]

I love this 'here's a problem' science, with questioins to follow up. And Tara Shears has a great way with words!