Lunarcy: NASA's Face Lift-Off Part I (Rocketing 2 Realism)

[un4g1v3n1]

Why would anyone block this video from audiences anywhere if it was based on a faulty premise? Answer: They wouldn't!

This video, and it's second part, show sufficiently the fact that no one was aboard the Saturn V's during their lift-off. As well as pointing out the fake Mercury launch!

[BloodOrange65]

maybe the shuttle video was done on a big gimble stage like the rides at universal studios... more shake, more realism, more shakey voices! ;)

[un4g1v3n1]

Ya...Too bad the Apollo days used such unrealistic fakery eh?

[EGMAG]

@un4g1v3n1

CONGRATULATIONS. EXCELLENTLY WELL DONE!

[TimReed22222]

Is this really the best "evidence" you have? A worthless & totally unscientific voice analysis???

Lame, lame, lame.

[un4g1v3n1]

Lame phil, is shallow comments where one word is repeated three times, as if that is some sort of magic formula. I think if you repeat it enough while facing your bathroom mirror, you may finally realize what your belief in Apollo is....

I guess guys like you can't use your own ears and common sense to sniff out a fraud like Apollo. The good news for you is that ignorance is bliss. The bad news however is how easy a target it makes you for salesmen and television evangelists!

[TimReed22222]

I'm just saying that if you want to convince anyone not already in your camp of anything, you'll need something a little more solid than *your* common sense; some EVIDENCE would be nice. For example, instead of your intuition, how about a SCIENCE-based stress analysis of their voices?

Also I note your astronaut-shaking comparison between the space shuttle and its 7,000,000 lbs of thrust vs. Shepard's Redstone rocket's 78,000 lbs - nearly 100x the thrust! You call that a fair comparison?

[un4g1v3n1]

The radiation cannot be debunked. It's there. It's deadly to humans. And if you did any research, you would know that! Van Allen's original assessment of the belts was that any missions into or beyond them would have to be unmanned until proper shielding was developed. Aluminum/Nylon is NOT adequate shielding! The shielding problem is still being researched to this day! Or don't you read up on current space news?

The 'supposed' recant by Van Allen came after pressure from the FOX program.

[TimReed22222]

"The radiation cannot be debunked. It's there. It's deadly to humans."

Can you please be specific: What DOSAGE would the astronauts have received? How much radiation would they absorb?

[un4g1v3n1]

Watch the Lunarcy radiation series, and Jarrah White's Moonfaker: Radioactive Anomaly...

Learn something!

watch?v=Bqv4q35QqUg&feature=Pl­ayList&p=97BE008EA32BA6BF&inde­x=0&playnext=1

Coming up with an exact amount of radiation one would be subjected to beyond our magnetosphere is basically impossible to predict. The amount, and types of radiaiton one would face is in a constant state of flux. Gamma Ray Bursts, X-Ray flares, solar flares, coronal mass ejections, etc...

[TimReed22222]

"Coming up with an exact amount of radiation one would be subjected to beyond our magnetosphere is basically impossible to predict."

If you can't say how much radiation the astronauts would have absorbed, then how can you say it would have killed them?

[un4g1v3n1]

Because the amount and intensity is beyond what any human has ever been able to survive here on Earth. Because the Low Dose radiation treatments on Earth destroy the nervous systems of human being over a period of time ranging from ten to thirty years. And we have morons running around claiming to have been subjected to insanely more radiation with no visible effects of that. Are you incapable of critical thought?

Then there were the MAJOR SOLAR FLARES physicists agree would have killed them!

[un4g1v3n1]

Camp? What is this, bible camp, where faith is all you need to believe in your Apollo God? ONLY 78 thousand pounds of thrust? You don't think that is enough for vibrations? You are truly an idiot. And way to avoid addressing the Saturn V's 7.64 million pounds force) of thrust to get the rocket through the first 61 kilometers of ascent. I guess hearing clear, vibration free voices during the kind of launch the apollonot describe, isn't enough to clue you in?

[TimReed22222]

"ONLY 78 thousand pounds of thrust? You don't think that is enough for vibrations?"

Sure - about 1/100th of what they'd get in the space shuttle!

[un4g1v3n1]

So, I guess listening to Shepard describe speeding up to 5 G's while no stress, or vibration occurs to his larnyx?

You really should get out more. Try talking to pilots about this issue. If they are capable of freeing themselves from the pride, and ego that goes along with this Apollo crap, you'll be quite amazed at what you learn from them.

You seem very naive to me. Plus most of what you have posted is complete crap.

[un4g1v3n1]

How does one collect evidence TIM? WIth OBSERVATIONS. One does that with their EYES and their EARS, in conjunction with what they already know, using one's common sense. Something obviously not abundant in yourself. Or you would see it like anyone else willing to open their eyes, and engage their minds.

A SCIENCE based stress analysis? All one has to use is their flipping ears there toe jam head. Or can't you hear the difference between Shephard/apollonots and shuttle pilots?

[alabastercodify]

Lame. Find something better to do with your time, or better still, learn to understand science.

[un4g1v3n1]

I always find it amazing when individuals like yourself have the audacity to use the word science in your vocabulary. I guess vibration and what that does to ones voice is beyond your scientific understanding? Try patting your belly and talk. Do you get it yet?

[ChosenOne67]

I'd like to say, un4, that you're doing a fantastic job with these videos! I find this sound analysis a fresh new perspective I have not seen before. Very telling!

Your work, and the efforts of those like you, is a godsend. Thank you!

[un4g1v3n1]

Thanks CO!

Waking up to the Apollo moon fraud is the easiest part. It listening to those you consider intelligent blather on about how they BELIEVE men went to the moon. They seem to aviod the KNOW word, as they must intuitively KNOW what a sham it was!

[user17v]

"When the wise man point his finger to the moon, idiot can see only his finger"

For some "blind" people NASA could just make a radio broadcast of the "moon landing" event, and many of them would believe that truly happened!

[lonewolf12052]

great vid. i like how you spliced pilots describing the lift off and then into the actual radio coms. really makes you think. This also brings up more questions then answers one of wich would be. why?

[un4g1v3n1]

The illusion of rocket/space domination over the Ruskies..

Billions of dollars...

The continued goal of domination over the masses, by an elite few.  That domination beginning with our minds. They have the majority of the world so dumbed down, they don't even realize the complete impossiblity of human space flight into or beyond the VAB's. People actually watch old Apollo video, seeing the astronots jerked around by invisible forces, and still can't accept they were fooled!

[theonlystory]

The conspiracy theory of NASA's space walk is a complete fraud. Do you think that the United States would waste billions of dollars toward building a space shuttle and finding professional astronauts just so they could create an "illusion" into space domination? Are you saying it is not possible for a moon walk to happen? Still today, the American flag that was planted there remains and has been seen by other countries who attempted and successfully made it to the moon. You have no hard evidence

[un4g1v3n1]

Yes, I'm saying a moon walk is impossible. If you knew jack about the radiation in space, you would know it was impossible as well. Educate yourself and you'll come to the same conclusion. Continue buying the propaganda, and you'll only continue making a fool of yourself!

[theonlystory]

Radiation? Sure it exists but the Earth's magnetic field blocks out most of it. The radiation that then penetrates the magnetic field is less harmful and can be easily deflected by means of a lead suit... So in theory, a moon walk is possible.

[demonikreaper]

Oh, and a shaking body does not mean a shaky voice. You can move your body quickly from side to side and still speak correctly.

[un4g1v3n1]

Tell that to the shuttle pilots demon!

[demonikreaper]

Oh for Godsake.

Seriously? Because they can't communicate as they ride a rocket designed for ICBMs, this proves that it didn't really happen?

Just... no.

[un4g1v3n1]

You didn't listen to the video did you? They communicated unrealistically for astronots being violently shaken around. And thankfully REAL launches, such as the shuttle, now demonstrate realism in communication during lift-off!

[un4g1v3n1]

02:20

Let me point out for those who wish to make a case against the noise, that Bill Anders tried to state he couldn't even communicate with the commander of the mission. So how the hell, could they communicate to mission control? It sure sounds like a contradiction to what we hear when they speak so clealy, with no background noise in their status reports to Mission Control! "It was REALLY LOUD!" -Neil Armstrong

[marsL001]

well said

[northerntruthseeker]

Excellent video, un4g1v3n1...

Waiting for our tried and true paid propagandists to come in here and give their BS a whirl.... Give them time, they will be in the house shortly!

[greenmagoos]

Getting better and better bro'. Ten out of ten.

Probably all simulated tapes they used during Apollo and that includes the moonset walking eva's regardless if it relates to any sort of (real) picture sent back from the moon.

[BritneySpeak]

One of the best (if not THE best) exposure of the apollo fraud , 5 stars and well done , don't expect too many contradictor tough , because i think their best move would be to totally ignore this (they can't say anything , it's impossible to defend)

[un4g1v3n1]

Thanks...but you really ought to check out Jarrah White's videos...The guy is a monster with his videos..Really takes Apollo apart at the seams...

[BritneySpeak]

Yes jarrah video are good , this one just top them all , as simple as that , i think i never saw such a good one since the apollo 15 flag , and the big navy salute dust , but THIS ONE is even better , a whole league above , and it appeal to everyone common sense and logic .

[BritneySpeak]

I can already imagine these little game mlaying bastards scratching their head so heard over this that they will bleed to death from it , because i don't see WHAT they could invent to defend this crap ! beside the optimistic "they had the right stuff" joke of course.

[guillaumedock]

Jarrah's videos sure are wonderful... they got me hooked on the moonhoax thing. (Warning shameless plug): But I believe I have made the best video on the missing landing crater - pseudonautics 3.

But then, un4g1v3n1 has nailed it. The sound argument is the simplest, most irrefutable argument. It's not rocket science, it's basic acoustics!

[ISamuelII]

@BritneySpeak "they can't say anything"

The apollonut might come up with 'they were wearing their space suit helmets and the mics were inside the helmets'. Yes and so were the ears that heard the "very loud" rockets.

[b6gm6n]

Funny how the audio/voice on that end clip of the shuttle astronots is worse then the tech used to transmit Neil-A's voice on Saturn...which is much clearer! - How much did the Saturn-V propoganda fireworks cost the US-Tax payer each?