kind of like those oooooooold video game screens, when you turn it on you see the same scenery in the back but you see all the possible moves that the action figure can take once you begin to play the game... except you see them all at once rather than 1 at a time, thats how i sometimes look at the world......
The way they discribe this in the first 2 min is the way that I sometimes look at the world, except I didnt think of it like that, I thought of it as Past Present and Future, I look at an empty space and imagine the traces of a person that went thru there, then i imagine now, me being there and then i imagine when im gone that there will be more people there and I too can come back and actually be in the same traces that other people have been thru... I guess if that makes any sense...
i think to some extent that these notions have survived because certain scientists get a thrill or feeling of superiority from being able to assert something that is entirely baffling. Einstein never bought it.
@wizardoflawz Ah but Einstein did. He knew and agreed with Tesla, did not admit this fact as well later declared that his greatest mistake was denouncing the quantum variable that kept appearing, via logic, in his equations.
Quantum physics has already been superseded by Plasma and Toroidal physics. Plasma is akin to the ancient 'ethers' and the toroid (vortex) is the structure of universal energies including suns. Toroidal physics is the physics of consciousness.
@WalkinLA actually he said his greatest mistake was the cosmological constant. i dont think he bought into quantum mechanics. "God does not play dice..."
@wizardoflawz You are correct, he didn't buy into and as such offered proof. You cannot negate something that does not exist. "What doesn't exist?"
He had one foot in the Newtonian world of predictability and the other in Heisenberg's world of uncertainty though he saw Tesla's theories work. In the end it all comes down to geometry, literally and Newton himself was a numerologist.
actually, im willing to bet the ball just exists where it is, like any other ball. It is not in a field of possibilities, because that is asking us to assume that it suddenly switches from all of those spaces, to one space, just because we look at it. its entirely self-centered to think that.
@wizardoflawz That's just movie special effects to talk to our eyeballs. Assume that we define a material sculpture from the potential each time and that only the potential persists prior to your presence there. Also assume that it's not choice like picking a color, but choice based on the sum total of all experiences you have ever had and what exists is harmonically resonance with that unique accumulation of energies that comprise you.
@wizardoflawz BTW, I am sure it's far more complex than I can imagine or words can say. I'm doing my best here though what I am sure of is that the particle makes the whole and we are 99.9% pure space at the scale of the cellular world.
Think of a radio station. What happened to the other stations when you turn the dial. They are still there right? Merely compressing a crystal ever so slightly finds another reality (94.7FM) that was lurking there all along. Humans are 'liquid crystal'.
@IcarusTouma The vastness precedes us so I will not endeavor to educate though start with authentic sacred geometry or the grey matter between your ears. Science tore the world apart to understand it. Spirituality and metaphysics is the stitching it back together.
"If you want to paint a perfect picture, make yourself perfect and simply paint." - Robert Pirsig
@WalkinLA I'm starting to think---no, I've noticed that you can't argue. You simply assert things but you have no evidence to back them up. Hmm sounds familiar. Great job at failing sir!
@IcarusTouma You assume I have something to prove. I do not and as such, your need for silly gisms will not be addressed. Why not agree to disagree rather than being a disrespectful prick? I accuse you of being a troll with nothing positive to share.
@WalkinLA You are the one who asserted that science and spirituality have been merged. I asked you for a link and proof and you showed me none. Therefore you fail at arguing....
being a conscious organism is strange. we assume that our consciousness is sort of the crux of the matter, but the thing we are is as complex and very strange. Because things dont match what we perceive, is because our perceptions are limited by our senses and our senses have told us that the universe is different that it really is on a sub-sensory level.
@aguirrmar Perception is unsettling when scientific inquiry discovers evidence that does not support what we see and experience. I figure we perceive the dense layer only of the soup of energies within which we exist. I suspect that wider slices of the electromagnetic pie are what we generally call evolution.
@exakdev Personally, I am not so sure they see what I see. What I feel is true is that the energy of other(s), including objects and vistas, remains intact and simultaneously generate their own scene. We can likely agree on the elements despite these being slightly different for each person. Levi Strauss proved that indigenous people could not see the Colonial ships because these exceeded the realm of experience to imagine it. The real was seen but not seen. Collective intent creates the new.
@exakdev come on, if thousands of people are watching a game of soccer and they saw the ball enter into the net. even the referee saw it, and there's a goal. everyone observed the same thing. nobody saw it in the other team's net. You live your everyday life and you have to be sure that people are seeing what you're seeing. Otherwise you'd be in a nuthouse.
NEW QUANTUM P6 NEWS*THE LEE SALEN-GA MANY WORLDS[GLOBALLY ROUND & LOCALLY FLAT EARTH PARADOX]WHICH IS EASIER TO COMPREHEND; BASED ON HENRI POINCARE'S[PRINCIPLE OF COMPLIMENTARIZED RELATIVITY OF SIMULTANEITY] THAT: "A THING OR PHENOMENA IN NATURE & IT'S ANTI-THETICAL OPPOSITE IS BOTH TRUE & VALID DEPENDING ON THE PERCEIVED OBSERVATION OF A PARTICIPATOR(PHYSICS OBSERVER)".THE [SALENGA TANGENT THEOREM]"THE TANGENT CONTACT LENGTH OF A STRAIGHT LINE TO A CIRCLE IS 2%OF THE CIRCUMFERENCE"!
THANKS TO GOD WHO DESIGNED NATURE'S QUANTUM MECHANICS. I'M LEE SALEN-GA AKA "THE LORD'S PROPHET*iSRAEL (ISAIAH 44:5) WHO MADE THE NEW EASIER TO COMPREHEND"MANY WORLDS" [GLOBALLY ROUND & LOCALLY FLAT EARTH PARADOX] OF QUANTUM PHYSICS AND DISCOVERED THE[SALEN-GA PHYSICS EFFECT]-THE INABILITY OF THE LIGHT FLOODED, TRANSPARENT BLACK OUTER SPACE TO REFLECT STAR(SUN)LIGHT." I AM A GODSENT WHO FULFILLED (ISAIAH 29:14-16) IN THE BIBLE, WHERE GOD PROPHESIED THAT MAN'S WISDOM WILL DROP DEAD! APROP.
hi. i remember in a video a while back (not sure what one), but it mentioned that electrons spin in both directions but i can't find it. i can't even remember what the video was called and when i told my friend this he did not believe me and now i can't prove it. help?
i think mb the reason quantum mechanics hasn't come up with an answer is because this whole area if filled with faulty logic. I haven't seen the results of the entanglement experiment where a particle was sent to the other side of the universe, btw.
@wizardoflawz It's a question of origin. Any authentic Cymatics demonstration will sort you out.
All is vibration and harmonic resonance. Life is flow. Form is the expression of that flow and does not precede presence except, apparently, where you have already asserted an intention path that will likely be followed again. The activity that occurs in each manifestation is currently too vast too imagine. Heck, if you had to control your breathing consciously, you would suffocate in 5 minutes.
@WalkinLA that just means that scientists have their work cut out for them. I agree with your point about perception. We are unable to perceive even a small percentage of the mechanisms that make our own bodies work. But that just means that scientific understanding is a long way away. I don't believe the esoteric side of quantum mechanics qualifies as scientific understanding. It is about as good as shrugging your shoulders quizzicly.
@wizardoflawz The specific tape, the one your imagination and intention creates via harmonic resonance with YOU is what you experience. Ironically, I feel that it's the ego that cannot allow subjectivity to be true.
i dont buy this stuff. its just a philosophical construct to say that the ball doesnt exist somewhere until you look at it. the ball is there, trust me.
@wizardoflawz Prove to the people on this thread that you are not a dreaming hologram?
The basis for the theory is the nature of subatomic particles. You cannot be comprised of something that is 99.9% pure space and somehow be independently solid. We experience solidity as a function of the bandwidth of energy we commonly share. That which we do not share passes right through us as if we do not exist because in that slice of life, we don't, physically exist.
@WalkinLA but in this slice of life, we do exist, and there are rules for that existence. i think there is a problem with the evidence suggesting that these particles dont have a fixed location unless we look at them. Just because we dont know what the location is doesnt mean it isn't there. There are trees in the forest. Im not sure where, but they can be located. That doesnt mean they decided to sit in one place just because i walk out there
@wizardoflawz exactly, so just because those scientists do not know the logical explanation of superpositioning, it doesn't mean there isn't one. So according to them, this video and those research did not exist until now, 5 march 2012, 2:13 pm, the moment i looked at it in youtube.
In order to "look" something there needs to be light. so when you try on "looking" an electron, you need to apply a photon, this photon alters the state of the electron.
thats why the objects spoken of are extremely small (the ones in multiples locations at same time).
now what you are doing is viewing this with a classical paradigm, thats why it seems ilogical, because its actually not conceivable in classical physics.
tried to explain very briefly and simple,might have mistaken
@Herrerinsky i understand all that. But I disagree with the conclusion, which is that the electron might be anywhere until we look at it. And I also heard about evidence that the particle acts like a wave, until you look at it, then it acts like a particle. i think this misses the obvious point that what we mean by "observe" is overly narrow. Obviously we are looking at things, at one point, if we can say something about them, that they are a wave. So one type of observation interferes...
@wizardoflawz I agree though the energetic flux that describes your body and mind engage a slightly different path each time you create a new thought. To write that same sentence again requires a slightly different me! All is subjective and the object is the active expression that our full spectrum energy manifests over & over again. Said another way, the tree exists before you get there, though is specifically formed by your presence and intentions. Instant manifestation would prove this.
@wizardoflawz The video is not saying that the ball is not there. The theory posits that the ball exists in a field of quantum probability that has many positions. The act of engaging the ball intentionally, creates a specific experience of the ball unique to yourself. I have asked someone to prove they exist. I think it is also interesting to consider that I cannot be certain the Nature of someone else's perception. You are in my 'video' differently than I am in yours.
The last 5 comments sound as if they all come from the same person! I think we are witnessing YouTube Superposition! ...or maybe it's bored FBI agents aspiring to keep people fat, stupid and happy and therefore 'manageable'! ...or Mr. Rogers is speaking from beyond the grave? It's definitely one of these three options!
It would make sense if the entire universe is a singularity, and that the expansion of space is just an illusion. I suppose it make sense to link it to the idea that our universe is actually a black hole in a parent universe (multiverse) and that to us inside observers it appears we are an anti-gravitational singularity expanding outwards, a white hole. Nothing can enter our event horizon, our anti-gravity force allows nothing as slow as the speed of light to enter.
@MrYendor1968 This thread is getting more interesting as if the comments are figuring out the answer! Here's my take. We are not the same person on the soul level, but as we individuate in time and space, we experience, arguably even create, our version of everyone and everything in it. Fringe science suggests that physical reality is holographic and most accept that the soul is eternal. That's not one soul with one expression but one soul with infinite expression. Which me do YOU prefer?
Is it just me or does the guy look like Leonard from Big Bang Theory. Watch at 2:13 and notice the guy's hair and finger fiddling. LOL could it be that he was used as the model for the character on the show?
@chickzey no more that we were all originally of the same thing but spread out therefor were technically all still connected no matter how large the universe is.
Hah! The argument for the blessed TRINITY. How God can be manifested in three distinct persons yet wholly One. Our fore fathers discussed this concept 2000 years ago.
There's something defintely not complete in all of this i guess. There is something about observing that we do when observing a particle that changes it. But it's not being "conscious" about it. That' all in our brain. It's something the equipment does when detecting a particle. It has to do something to the particle that collapses the wavefunction. You could be blind and still operate it somehow. The readout method changes but the detection method is the thing that remains the same. Same result
@PainSurgeon So the basketball thing is just an example of what happens. The woman in the video would be a detector in real life, the basketball a particle. Each time the detector sends a signal to bounce back (or absorbs a signal when looking), it changes the particle's wavefunction somehow. It's not that the detector said "oeh i'm aware of it now and that changes everything". Detecting is observing, while being aware of the observed thing is part of processing the observed information.
Okay, one idea I have just thought of for superposition is the existence of more than 3 dimensions. Take any object, and you can see that it exists in 3 dimensions. Look at a specific piece of an object and try to look at it in one dimension, independently from the other two. Focus on one point. Now, look at it, in a different dimension, again independently from the other two. You can see it sort of exists multiple times. Maybe superposition is simply the object's existence in another dimension.
@seanpull I am not sure we are using the correct words here but you are suggesting that simultaneity is what we are experiencing. If so, I agree. I believe that all exists and our consciousness is oriented to the 3D/4D. This is the problem solving realm where we can actually interact with the solid expression of energy. The same energy-things elsewhere are likely 'standing waves of energetic matrices' (not solid). I also believe we are 'elsewhere' which explains intuition and psychic ability.
@WalkinLA So essentially, because the human brain is capable of comprehending the third dimension (and all subsidiary dimensions) given our visual acuity based on light and an innate understanding of perspective in 2d images; we are only able to comprehend our third dimensional existence. When in reality, we may exist in the fourth dimension - and possibly other superior dimensions - without being conscious of it.
@seanpull it says that a particle is 3000 postions at once.. then once detected it snaps into simgle postion. now is that particle in 3000 postions in relation to my perception, or in relation to the universe. I walk into a room and see a particle. I then say hey come look at this particle. now when you walk do you see the particle in the position i detected? or do you see it in the position you detected? continue in next comment
@shinerinacan if you are seeing the particle in the position I detected then we are viewing the same particle, in the the same dimension,in the same position. BUT if you are seeing the particle in the postion YOU detected... then we are both viewing the same particle, in the same position, but with two different perceptions. (2 different dimensions plus the dimension the particle is actually in) 3 dimensions?!?!?
@SilentMott The classic philosophical question. Does presence cause reality and if so where does presence come from? In my view the tree does exist as well EVERYTHING exists as potential in an energy form. Existence itself is arguably holographic (Read - Holographic Universe) and as such we may not experience nor bring all of that potential into our sphere of awareness, though it does not cease to exist if we don't. It is 'real' for someone, somewhere? Can we know of what we don't co-create?
@WalkinLA Haha I understand what you're saying and its a great validation for the tree's existence. Just out of curiosity, what is the definition of "holographic" you are using. Its hard NOT to be philosophical after you reach a point where science is mostly speculation and I'm not that familiar with trying to quantify what existence is using physics. The movie made it sound like the tree wasn't real for anyone if nobody was around to see it. I see their point though.
@SilentMott Another huge question! Start with the idea that any cell under a microscope is 99.9% pure space and this space is most easily understand by particle movement rather than matter. Add to this the transient nature of time, the role of our intentions and consciousness as well the sliver of the known EM spectrum that we occupy, and presence itself is clearly not the source of our experience. It must therefore emanate, and I speculate, form a collision of the 'macro' with local intention.
@VideoSlob I don't believe the video suggested that there is no effect. Quite the contrary. It re-situates YOU as the effector who benefits or struggles due to the effect you co-produce. This view demands self responsibility.
We are generally in the frame of mind that 'life' delivers effects onto our bodies and awareness. Quantum, as well Plasma and Toroidal physics re-situate the viewer in BOTH the originating position as well the receiving position. We are BOTH the dancer and the dance.
@DuoElement A wave is a sinewave as you might see on an EEG or EKG in a hospital. These don't exist in Nature though they are a way of measuring and relating to the energy that describes material things. Each have their own unique frequency, like a radio station frequency (94.7 for example) and what is unique in Quantum physics is that all objects are shown to be made of both matter and waves. Waves 'communicate' and are considered 'entangled' over great distances, therefore matter does too!
this is simple guys. it's not that there's space between the particle, it's just that we are looking at it from a perspective that wouldn't allow us to see the connecting features of the particle, or the invisible space, that is being seen by the scientists.
i do apologize for being an ass.... but.... this is not that hard to comprehend. a particle can/does act as a wave. whats the hard part to understand?
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
@MrLazy27 Interesting. Can you elaborate? Logic suggests more complex higher dimensions are required for access to multiplicity, but you are suggesting it all squashes down to flatness and one may access the full potentiality there. My gut tells me you could observe and monitor 'somehow' though not access because 2D does not provide enough material to actually engage. Each dimension comes with its own set of rules.
@WalkinLA random question. it's really late and so my brain isn't working fully, but what if every observer was blind, deaf, and numb? how would observing reality work when the observers can't observe? to be honest, not sure where i'm going with this, if it's anything significant...lol
@68dzintra If you understand what is being said in these videos and it's clear to me because it is the point of this whole video , then you realize it is saying that EVERYTHING IS RELATIVE, it behaves according to the observer. (My upper caps were only meant for emphasis). How did you miss that?
@celestian1111 Relativity presumes that the objects being observed are separate from the observer. Quantum mechanics understands that the objects are dependent upon being observed. The latter is not relative but causative. Science has already delved into Plasma physics and toroidal physics as well. Relativity has gone the way of the dinosaurs.
@WalkinLA I appreciate your semantic insight. I had forgotten what I replied to and went back to read it. I think my rhetoric had to do with the person's point that philosophy was relative but science is exact, right/wrong, which is not what these revelations are indicating. But you are right, when an observer changes the outcome, it is causative. However, they do talk about the electrons at diff ends of universe not requiring travel b/c they are indeed, still connected. Good stuff!
@celestian1111 I think we can assume we are in both places contrary to what our senses are telling us....which is really weird but our minds for now can travel places that our bodies cannot follow. A perfect analogy is any measure. We invent a measure which causes something to formally exist, catalog & label it, dissect it & build museums to showcase our genius, but what to do with light & other intangibles? We have burrowed our way back to source & must engage BOTH the inch & the yardstick.
@WalkinLA If what you say is true, then Relativity is right. Objects are NOT dependent upon being observed. What I find appalling is how so many people with inquiring minds resort to some bullshit Dr. Quantum video rather than read an actual Physics book.
@eirikmurito Time is a function of position, temperature and entropy, dependent upon observation. Given that at any moment, an infinite array of expressions are possible, upon looking, one expression results that we co-create. Carl Sagan suggested that the Universe creates life in order to know itself. We learn of who we are and what life is by looking and choosing and as such, many options becomes one, discernible experience and time is how we measure each new frame of that experience.
What don't understand about superposition is how do objects like machines, for instance, even operate independent of our observation.
When we start a car, we're not observing the engine itself, but it still operates independent of our observation. Say, would the car engine be in superpostion? How does superposition explain this? May someone fill me in?
@AstralEtheric This is a great question. Do the laws of physics only pertain to the organic? It seems there must be a place that is neutral, like the grounding post of an electrical outlet, that is neither positive of negative but somehow resides between the dynamic force of Nature. Machines are surrogates that operate independent the vital energies that cause plants to grow and cause our hearts to beat. According to Marshall McCluhan, technology reflects isolated parts of ourselves.
@AstralEtheric Simple enough. It's because superposition has nothing to do with machines and engines running independent of observation. Superposition has nothing to do with an observer. These videos that make such suggestions are nothing more than new age quackery.
@AstralEtheric Simply, superposition is when a particle (electron) exists in all its particular, theoretically possible states (configuration of its properties).
not trolling at all.... i just know athiests need scientsts to prove the things i allready know thanks to hinduism... like they have allready done with the conservation of energy (reincarnation) and the fact that all thing are made of the same inpershiable essence (energy) and that that energy is ultmatly one (as proved by entanglement)
not to mention reality being a illusion, mulitple dimensions, and a ossilating universe .
@topbluffa1 I think it's funny that despite metaphor of religion being applied to scientific discoveries post hoc, the validity of religion as a source of knowledge is still very low. Science seeks to falsify theories and any theories that don't get falsified are put to further tests. It is a philosophical process, not just a bank of knowledge. Even if Hinduism is 100% correct, it's not as valid as science as it doesn't make use of rigourous testing, it's all just assumed on faith.
wrong Hinduism goes under rigorous testing with people having different theories on the same matters just like in science the word Vedas (hindu holy books) means Knowledge ... modern science is just modern knowledge and is part of Hinduism also.
just remember Hinduism knew about a imperishable essence (as proves by the law of conservation of energ)that makes up all things (mass/energy) when science still thought things was destroyed when burned for example...
not to mention such ideas as reality as a illusion, a oscillating or cyclic universe, energy and mass being the same thing (E=mc2) , and like i said the conservation of energy/mass and seeing through the illusion of a objectified reality or the false sense of being a individual separate from the multi-verse nor are you a tiny Part of that mulitverse you ARE Absolute reality and all parts/events are just concepts we have created.
this video and EVERYTHING the scientists say in it could be copy and pasted from the Vedas which are over 3000 years old..
get your head out of your ass... and research into concepts of god beyond a guy with a fluffy beard like you have seen depicted on the Simpsons or something.
@topbluffa1 I know science is a branch of philosophy. You clearly didn't read what I said very carefully though, I was talking about the process of acquiring knowledge, not the factual content of it. If you want to get really philosophical, the only thing we truly know is that we exist. I'm not trying to take away from the beauty of Hinduism, I'm just highlighting the fact that without scientific reasoning, all claims of the universes' existence is unsubstantiated and no better than myth.
and its a fact the ancient findings of the Vedas are now being backed up by MODERN science.
law of conservation.
discovery of energy.
discovery all mass is ultimately one .
plus much more. and why do you think Hinduism cant add to its knowledge like science does?
your basing your idea of a religion on the one you hate which im guessing is Christiana and it seems the only concept of god you know is a man with a fluffy beard.
@topbluffa1 Let us not forget that Hinduism put men on the moon, helped produce all the electronic gizmos we have today, and is helping us find cures to diseases. Oh, wait a minute, that was science. My mistake.
@topbluffa1 Science isn't just "knowledge". It's a proven method for understanding the material world. Look up "scientific method". It sounds you want to believe that Hinduism is the source of modern science. Feel free to believe that if you wish, but you are insulting thinking people everywhere.
go watch your beloved scientist Carl Sagan talk about Hinduism and also the vedas proclaim a oscillating universe and the idea of a substance that cannot be created or destroyed only converted that makes up all things..... sound familiar? Hinduism is approximately 7000 years ahead western scientists.
I watch (or listen really) to this movie (What The Bleep: Down the Rabbit Hole) pretty much every day and it sure take more than one time for this information to really sink into your head...But the movie is amazing :)
@PeaceLenah4 I would agree. Time is a difficult concept to grasp and understanding, difficult to measure. I am most intrigued by the manner in which our participation affects the outcome of an experience. I figure we all ought to pay closer attention to that to realize our true power and assume a grand responsibility in the big scheme of things. We study complex subjects and measure with sensitive technologies and often fail to realize these are merely reflections of who and where we are.
@WalkinLA Exactly, but people probably won't agree with most consepts of quantum mechanics because we have grown up with everything already in place and they would probably assume that we fantisize all of thins since it seems so..Out of reach
@bmwm3cs An excerpt from the documentary "What the Bleep". There does seem to be many additional short vids that came out after the actual documentary though. This may have been from one of the later releases.
You gotta watch it a few times for the information to sink in. There is no time, only subjective selection. We are creating 'reality' and blaming it on others....
kind of like those oooooooold video game screens, when you turn it on you see the same scenery in the back but you see all the possible moves that the action figure can take once you begin to play the game... except you see them all at once rather than 1 at a time, thats how i sometimes look at the world......
chukz650 1 day ago
The way they discribe this in the first 2 min is the way that I sometimes look at the world, except I didnt think of it like that, I thought of it as Past Present and Future, I look at an empty space and imagine the traces of a person that went thru there, then i imagine now, me being there and then i imagine when im gone that there will be more people there and I too can come back and actually be in the same traces that other people have been thru... I guess if that makes any sense...
chukz650 1 day ago
i think to some extent that these notions have survived because certain scientists get a thrill or feeling of superiority from being able to assert something that is entirely baffling. Einstein never bought it.
wizardoflawz 2 days ago
@wizardoflawz Ah but Einstein did. He knew and agreed with Tesla, did not admit this fact as well later declared that his greatest mistake was denouncing the quantum variable that kept appearing, via logic, in his equations.
Quantum physics has already been superseded by Plasma and Toroidal physics. Plasma is akin to the ancient 'ethers' and the toroid (vortex) is the structure of universal energies including suns. Toroidal physics is the physics of consciousness.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
@WalkinLA actually he said his greatest mistake was the cosmological constant. i dont think he bought into quantum mechanics. "God does not play dice..."
wizardoflawz 2 days ago
@wizardoflawz You are correct, he didn't buy into and as such offered proof. You cannot negate something that does not exist. "What doesn't exist?"
He had one foot in the Newtonian world of predictability and the other in Heisenberg's world of uncertainty though he saw Tesla's theories work. In the end it all comes down to geometry, literally and Newton himself was a numerologist.
Which EM superhighway are you traveling today?
WalkinLA 2 days ago
actually, im willing to bet the ball just exists where it is, like any other ball. It is not in a field of possibilities, because that is asking us to assume that it suddenly switches from all of those spaces, to one space, just because we look at it. its entirely self-centered to think that.
wizardoflawz 2 days ago
@wizardoflawz That's just movie special effects to talk to our eyeballs. Assume that we define a material sculpture from the potential each time and that only the potential persists prior to your presence there. Also assume that it's not choice like picking a color, but choice based on the sum total of all experiences you have ever had and what exists is harmonically resonance with that unique accumulation of energies that comprise you.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
@wizardoflawz BTW, I am sure it's far more complex than I can imagine or words can say. I'm doing my best here though what I am sure of is that the particle makes the whole and we are 99.9% pure space at the scale of the cellular world.
Think of a radio station. What happened to the other stations when you turn the dial. They are still there right? Merely compressing a crystal ever so slightly finds another reality (94.7FM) that was lurking there all along. Humans are 'liquid crystal'.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
Is this from the "What the bleep d we know?" movie? If so then it has no credibility whatsoever...
IcarusTouma 4 days ago
@IcarusTouma Have a peek at the video title and please edumacate we little humans.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
@WalkinLA This documentary is nothing but pseudoscience.....
IcarusTouma 2 days ago
@IcarusTouma Considering that science and spirituality and consciousness have merged, I would agree that the video is pseudo science.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
@WalkinLA Really? Has spirituality and science merged? Can you provide a legitimate link?
IcarusTouma 2 days ago
@IcarusTouma The vastness precedes us so I will not endeavor to educate though start with authentic sacred geometry or the grey matter between your ears. Science tore the world apart to understand it. Spirituality and metaphysics is the stitching it back together.
"If you want to paint a perfect picture, make yourself perfect and simply paint." - Robert Pirsig
WalkinLA 2 days ago
@WalkinLA You failed to post a legitimate link so everything you posted has no credibility.
IcarusTouma 2 days ago
@IcarusTouma I AM the legitimate link! LOL I think therefore I link!
WalkinLA 2 days ago
@WalkinLA Sure, whatever helps you sleep at night buddy!
IcarusTouma 2 days ago
@IcarusTouma I'm starting to think you are 2 feet tall and have long pointy shoes that curl up on the end.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
@WalkinLA I'm starting to think---no, I've noticed that you can't argue. You simply assert things but you have no evidence to back them up. Hmm sounds familiar. Great job at failing sir!
IcarusTouma 2 days ago
@IcarusTouma You assume I have something to prove. I do not and as such, your need for silly gisms will not be addressed. Why not agree to disagree rather than being a disrespectful prick? I accuse you of being a troll with nothing positive to share.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
@WalkinLA You are the one who asserted that science and spirituality have been merged. I asked you for a link and proof and you showed me none. Therefore you fail at arguing....
IcarusTouma 2 days ago
God is chuckling right now, watching rats run around a maze..
aguirrmar 4 days ago
@aguirrmar Prove that "god" exists...
IcarusTouma 4 days ago
being a conscious organism is strange. we assume that our consciousness is sort of the crux of the matter, but the thing we are is as complex and very strange. Because things dont match what we perceive, is because our perceptions are limited by our senses and our senses have told us that the universe is different that it really is on a sub-sensory level.
aguirrmar 4 days ago
@aguirrmar Perception is unsettling when scientific inquiry discovers evidence that does not support what we see and experience. I figure we perceive the dense layer only of the soup of energies within which we exist. I suspect that wider slices of the electromagnetic pie are what we generally call evolution.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
the thing is, it's not just me who's looking or observing, everyone else can see it in the same position
exakdev 6 days ago
@exakdev Personally, I am not so sure they see what I see. What I feel is true is that the energy of other(s), including objects and vistas, remains intact and simultaneously generate their own scene. We can likely agree on the elements despite these being slightly different for each person. Levi Strauss proved that indigenous people could not see the Colonial ships because these exceeded the realm of experience to imagine it. The real was seen but not seen. Collective intent creates the new.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
@exakdev come on, if thousands of people are watching a game of soccer and they saw the ball enter into the net. even the referee saw it, and there's a goal. everyone observed the same thing. nobody saw it in the other team's net. You live your everyday life and you have to be sure that people are seeing what you're seeing. Otherwise you'd be in a nuthouse.
exakdev 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW QUANTUM P6 NEWS*THE LEE SALEN-GA MANY WORLDS[GLOBALLY ROUND & LOCALLY FLAT EARTH PARADOX]WHICH IS EASIER TO COMPREHEND; BASED ON HENRI POINCARE'S[PRINCIPLE OF COMPLIMENTARIZED RELATIVITY OF SIMULTANEITY] THAT: "A THING OR PHENOMENA IN NATURE & IT'S ANTI-THETICAL OPPOSITE IS BOTH TRUE & VALID DEPENDING ON THE PERCEIVED OBSERVATION OF A PARTICIPATOR(PHYSICS OBSERVER)".THE [SALENGA TANGENT THEOREM]"THE TANGENT CONTACT LENGTH OF A STRAIGHT LINE TO A CIRCLE IS 2%OF THE CIRCUMFERENCE"!
CONDUIT99PERCENT 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THANKS TO GOD WHO DESIGNED NATURE'S QUANTUM MECHANICS. I'M LEE SALEN-GA AKA "THE LORD'S PROPHET*iSRAEL (ISAIAH 44:5) WHO MADE THE NEW EASIER TO COMPREHEND"MANY WORLDS" [GLOBALLY ROUND & LOCALLY FLAT EARTH PARADOX] OF QUANTUM PHYSICS AND DISCOVERED THE[SALEN-GA PHYSICS EFFECT]-THE INABILITY OF THE LIGHT FLOODED, TRANSPARENT BLACK OUTER SPACE TO REFLECT STAR(SUN)LIGHT." I AM A GODSENT WHO FULFILLED (ISAIAH 29:14-16) IN THE BIBLE, WHERE GOD PROPHESIED THAT MAN'S WISDOM WILL DROP DEAD! APROP.
CONDUIT99PERCENT 1 week ago
hi. i remember in a video a while back (not sure what one), but it mentioned that electrons spin in both directions but i can't find it. i can't even remember what the video was called and when i told my friend this he did not believe me and now i can't prove it. help?
Layla5915 1 week ago
i think mb the reason quantum mechanics hasn't come up with an answer is because this whole area if filled with faulty logic. I haven't seen the results of the entanglement experiment where a particle was sent to the other side of the universe, btw.
wizardoflawz 1 week ago
@wizardoflawz It's a question of origin. Any authentic Cymatics demonstration will sort you out.
All is vibration and harmonic resonance. Life is flow. Form is the expression of that flow and does not precede presence except, apparently, where you have already asserted an intention path that will likely be followed again. The activity that occurs in each manifestation is currently too vast too imagine. Heck, if you had to control your breathing consciously, you would suffocate in 5 minutes.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
@WalkinLA that just means that scientists have their work cut out for them. I agree with your point about perception. We are unable to perceive even a small percentage of the mechanisms that make our own bodies work. But that just means that scientific understanding is a long way away. I don't believe the esoteric side of quantum mechanics qualifies as scientific understanding. It is about as good as shrugging your shoulders quizzicly.
wizardoflawz 2 days ago
before you look at the tape, it is recorded. it is just egoistic to declare that the tape has no evidence before you look at it
wizardoflawz 1 week ago
@wizardoflawz The specific tape, the one your imagination and intention creates via harmonic resonance with YOU is what you experience. Ironically, I feel that it's the ego that cannot allow subjectivity to be true.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
i dont buy this stuff. its just a philosophical construct to say that the ball doesnt exist somewhere until you look at it. the ball is there, trust me.
wizardoflawz 1 week ago
@wizardoflawz Prove to the people on this thread that you are not a dreaming hologram?
The basis for the theory is the nature of subatomic particles. You cannot be comprised of something that is 99.9% pure space and somehow be independently solid. We experience solidity as a function of the bandwidth of energy we commonly share. That which we do not share passes right through us as if we do not exist because in that slice of life, we don't, physically exist.
WalkinLA 1 week ago
@WalkinLA but in this slice of life, we do exist, and there are rules for that existence. i think there is a problem with the evidence suggesting that these particles dont have a fixed location unless we look at them. Just because we dont know what the location is doesnt mean it isn't there. There are trees in the forest. Im not sure where, but they can be located. That doesnt mean they decided to sit in one place just because i walk out there
wizardoflawz 1 week ago
@wizardoflawz exactly, so just because those scientists do not know the logical explanation of superpositioning, it doesn't mean there isn't one. So according to them, this video and those research did not exist until now, 5 march 2012, 2:13 pm, the moment i looked at it in youtube.
exakdev 6 days ago
@wizardoflawz
In order to "look" something there needs to be light. so when you try on "looking" an electron, you need to apply a photon, this photon alters the state of the electron.
thats why the objects spoken of are extremely small (the ones in multiples locations at same time).
now what you are doing is viewing this with a classical paradigm, thats why it seems ilogical, because its actually not conceivable in classical physics.
tried to explain very briefly and simple,might have mistaken
Herrerinsky 5 days ago
@Herrerinsky i understand all that. But I disagree with the conclusion, which is that the electron might be anywhere until we look at it. And I also heard about evidence that the particle acts like a wave, until you look at it, then it acts like a particle. i think this misses the obvious point that what we mean by "observe" is overly narrow. Obviously we are looking at things, at one point, if we can say something about them, that they are a wave. So one type of observation interferes...
wizardoflawz 5 days ago
@wizardoflawz I agree though the energetic flux that describes your body and mind engage a slightly different path each time you create a new thought. To write that same sentence again requires a slightly different me! All is subjective and the object is the active expression that our full spectrum energy manifests over & over again. Said another way, the tree exists before you get there, though is specifically formed by your presence and intentions. Instant manifestation would prove this.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
@wizardoflawz The video is not saying that the ball is not there. The theory posits that the ball exists in a field of quantum probability that has many positions. The act of engaging the ball intentionally, creates a specific experience of the ball unique to yourself. I have asked someone to prove they exist. I think it is also interesting to consider that I cannot be certain the Nature of someone else's perception. You are in my 'video' differently than I am in yours.
WalkinLA 2 days ago
This makes me really wonder if the number 5 is married...
Nitricike 2 weeks ago
What experiments are being cited at 6:40?
GGAlice1 2 weeks ago
trinary: on, off, both/neither (potential)
aurian555 2 weeks ago
wow
ElementHTTP 2 weeks ago
well crack it one day, i want my own planet.
daniel246 3 weeks ago
imagine how smart that kid is gonna be. Either that or he's just real good at reading lines without understanding it
Drose4president 3 weeks ago
2:15, that was a horrible simile in explaining it
Drose4president 3 weeks ago
welcome to the real world, neo
THETRUEVOICEOFROCK 3 weeks ago 2
there is no spoon.
threzzify 3 weeks ago
wtf, why do these kind of spambots even exist?
RisingAtheists 3 weeks ago
The last 5 comments sound as if they all come from the same person! I think we are witnessing YouTube Superposition! ...or maybe it's bored FBI agents aspiring to keep people fat, stupid and happy and therefore 'manageable'! ...or Mr. Rogers is speaking from beyond the grave? It's definitely one of these three options!
WalkinLA 4 weeks ago
@WalkinLA lol youtube Superpositioning
exakdev 6 days ago
I Love The Video It Can Increase My Knowledge Waves of possibility when not looking versus particles of experience when looking
indiage 4 weeks ago
Good, I like that you share this video, I wish success always Waves of possibility when not looking versus particles of experience when looking
godguetar 4 weeks ago
Nice Video That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You Quantum Superposition - What the Bleep excerpt
jutsmyface 4 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video From Your Quantum Superposition - What the Bleep excerpt
jhoenedu 1 month ago
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Quantum Superposition What the Bleep excerpt
croncong 1 month ago
It would make sense if the entire universe is a singularity, and that the expansion of space is just an illusion. I suppose it make sense to link it to the idea that our universe is actually a black hole in a parent universe (multiverse) and that to us inside observers it appears we are an anti-gravitational singularity expanding outwards, a white hole. Nothing can enter our event horizon, our anti-gravity force allows nothing as slow as the speed of light to enter.
lordcodicus 1 month ago
so that would mean were all the same person . just with diffrent perceptions or perspectives of the same thing
MrYendor1968 1 month ago
@MrYendor1968 This thread is getting more interesting as if the comments are figuring out the answer! Here's my take. We are not the same person on the soul level, but as we individuate in time and space, we experience, arguably even create, our version of everyone and everything in it. Fringe science suggests that physical reality is holographic and most accept that the soul is eternal. That's not one soul with one expression but one soul with infinite expression. Which me do YOU prefer?
WalkinLA 1 month ago
@MrYendor1968 not "big" enough scope. Must concieve in a "larger" way.
EndureFocusEngageDie 1 month ago
Is it just me or does the guy look like Leonard from Big Bang Theory. Watch at 2:13 and notice the guy's hair and finger fiddling. LOL could it be that he was used as the model for the character on the show?
psythefry 1 month ago
Does this mean, that the universe is made out of 1 atom, that is being everywhere?
chickzey 1 month ago
@chickzey no more that we were all originally of the same thing but spread out therefor were technically all still connected no matter how large the universe is.
drajen911 1 month ago
Thats the death girl from my name is earl.
flummkaka 1 month ago
The theory is now there is 5 if every thing
Every where all in different dementions
CreepyVogelsBird 1 month ago
@CreepyVogelsBird actually its as many as we dont percieve
drajen911 1 month ago
1:30 I SEEN THE MOVIE THATS FROM, SHES DEAF// I DIDNT MEAN TO CAPS
MediumNothinFull 1 month ago
@MediumNothinFull Her name os Marly Matlin and the movie is called What the Bleep.
WalkinLA 1 month ago
Hah! The argument for the blessed TRINITY. How God can be manifested in three distinct persons yet wholly One. Our fore fathers discussed this concept 2000 years ago.
kgstph 1 month ago
This is how Santa Claus handles all his deliveries.
harkinhank 1 month ago
The whole 5 anecdote was totally nerdy rofl.
Nameless742 1 month ago
The number 5 is a whore.
Usurperrhcp 1 month ago
Time travel? Two objects, the same, different places?
CyricRO 1 month ago
would make basketball more interesting
wolly2000 2 months ago
There's something defintely not complete in all of this i guess. There is something about observing that we do when observing a particle that changes it. But it's not being "conscious" about it. That' all in our brain. It's something the equipment does when detecting a particle. It has to do something to the particle that collapses the wavefunction. You could be blind and still operate it somehow. The readout method changes but the detection method is the thing that remains the same. Same result
PainSurgeon 2 months ago
@PainSurgeon So the basketball thing is just an example of what happens. The woman in the video would be a detector in real life, the basketball a particle. Each time the detector sends a signal to bounce back (or absorbs a signal when looking), it changes the particle's wavefunction somehow. It's not that the detector said "oeh i'm aware of it now and that changes everything". Detecting is observing, while being aware of the observed thing is part of processing the observed information.
PainSurgeon 2 months ago
@PainSurgeon When we are "observing" on that small scale of particles, we actually interfere with them.
PainSurgeon 2 months ago
..someone is going to read this and understand me..
1y9b9b 2 months ago
Quantum Physics = Troll Science...
braklinath 2 months ago
Okay, one idea I have just thought of for superposition is the existence of more than 3 dimensions. Take any object, and you can see that it exists in 3 dimensions. Look at a specific piece of an object and try to look at it in one dimension, independently from the other two. Focus on one point. Now, look at it, in a different dimension, again independently from the other two. You can see it sort of exists multiple times. Maybe superposition is simply the object's existence in another dimension.
seanpull 2 months ago 2
@seanpull I am not sure we are using the correct words here but you are suggesting that simultaneity is what we are experiencing. If so, I agree. I believe that all exists and our consciousness is oriented to the 3D/4D. This is the problem solving realm where we can actually interact with the solid expression of energy. The same energy-things elsewhere are likely 'standing waves of energetic matrices' (not solid). I also believe we are 'elsewhere' which explains intuition and psychic ability.
WalkinLA 2 months ago
@WalkinLA So essentially, because the human brain is capable of comprehending the third dimension (and all subsidiary dimensions) given our visual acuity based on light and an innate understanding of perspective in 2d images; we are only able to comprehend our third dimensional existence. When in reality, we may exist in the fourth dimension - and possibly other superior dimensions - without being conscious of it.
delyonuk1 2 months ago
@seanpull it says that a particle is 3000 postions at once.. then once detected it snaps into simgle postion. now is that particle in 3000 postions in relation to my perception, or in relation to the universe. I walk into a room and see a particle. I then say hey come look at this particle. now when you walk do you see the particle in the position i detected? or do you see it in the position you detected? continue in next comment
shinerinacan 2 months ago
@shinerinacan if you are seeing the particle in the position I detected then we are viewing the same particle, in the the same dimension,in the same position. BUT if you are seeing the particle in the postion YOU detected... then we are both viewing the same particle, in the same position, but with two different perceptions. (2 different dimensions plus the dimension the particle is actually in) 3 dimensions?!?!?
shinerinacan 2 months ago
Comment removed
seanpull 2 months ago
So if a tree falls in the woods and nobody is there to hear it...the trees fails to exist?!?!
SilentMott 2 months ago
@SilentMott The classic philosophical question. Does presence cause reality and if so where does presence come from? In my view the tree does exist as well EVERYTHING exists as potential in an energy form. Existence itself is arguably holographic (Read - Holographic Universe) and as such we may not experience nor bring all of that potential into our sphere of awareness, though it does not cease to exist if we don't. It is 'real' for someone, somewhere? Can we know of what we don't co-create?
WalkinLA 2 months ago
@WalkinLA Haha I understand what you're saying and its a great validation for the tree's existence. Just out of curiosity, what is the definition of "holographic" you are using. Its hard NOT to be philosophical after you reach a point where science is mostly speculation and I'm not that familiar with trying to quantify what existence is using physics. The movie made it sound like the tree wasn't real for anyone if nobody was around to see it. I see their point though.
SilentMott 2 months ago
@SilentMott Another huge question! Start with the idea that any cell under a microscope is 99.9% pure space and this space is most easily understand by particle movement rather than matter. Add to this the transient nature of time, the role of our intentions and consciousness as well the sliver of the known EM spectrum that we occupy, and presence itself is clearly not the source of our experience. It must therefore emanate, and I speculate, form a collision of the 'macro' with local intention.
WalkinLA 2 months ago
So basically things have no effect on me, or anyone, until i observe it? I don't believe that.
VideoSlob 2 months ago
@VideoSlob I don't believe the video suggested that there is no effect. Quite the contrary. It re-situates YOU as the effector who benefits or struggles due to the effect you co-produce. This view demands self responsibility.
We are generally in the frame of mind that 'life' delivers effects onto our bodies and awareness. Quantum, as well Plasma and Toroidal physics re-situate the viewer in BOTH the originating position as well the receiving position. We are BOTH the dancer and the dance.
WalkinLA 2 months ago
Where can i get a new brain?I i just blew mine...
Killadey 2 months ago
@Killadey I think Home Depot has a tool for that! LOL
WalkinLA 2 months ago
Has anyone elses mind imploded?
masterbarnard 2 months ago
What do they mean by wave function?
DuoElement 2 months ago
@DuoElement A wave is a sinewave as you might see on an EEG or EKG in a hospital. These don't exist in Nature though they are a way of measuring and relating to the energy that describes material things. Each have their own unique frequency, like a radio station frequency (94.7 for example) and what is unique in Quantum physics is that all objects are shown to be made of both matter and waves. Waves 'communicate' and are considered 'entangled' over great distances, therefore matter does too!
WalkinLA 2 months ago
maybe they looked into another dimension, the 2nd dimension.
rambotanker 2 months ago
so is it like when you cross your eyes and see double images, yet when you try to focus on one they revert back to one image?
erinmjacs 2 months ago
this is simple guys. it's not that there's space between the particle, it's just that we are looking at it from a perspective that wouldn't allow us to see the connecting features of the particle, or the invisible space, that is being seen by the scientists.
emopoppins 2 months ago
I would marry the number 5 if I could. Just sayin'...
User5973 3 months ago
The number five and I are quite happily married, if you must know.
Nulono 3 months ago
i do apologize for being an ass.... but.... this is not that hard to comprehend. a particle can/does act as a wave. whats the hard part to understand?
PhotonBagger 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
nickharvey7 3 months ago
Experiencing multiple possibilities at once can be achieved through 2-dimensional time.
MrLazy27 3 months ago
@MrLazy27 Interesting. Can you elaborate? Logic suggests more complex higher dimensions are required for access to multiplicity, but you are suggesting it all squashes down to flatness and one may access the full potentiality there. My gut tells me you could observe and monitor 'somehow' though not access because 2D does not provide enough material to actually engage. Each dimension comes with its own set of rules.
WalkinLA 2 months ago
@WalkinLA random question. it's really late and so my brain isn't working fully, but what if every observer was blind, deaf, and numb? how would observing reality work when the observers can't observe? to be honest, not sure where i'm going with this, if it's anything significant...lol
braklinath 2 months ago
@braklinath Well, if the observer isn't observing he is not an observer.
hckling 2 months ago
@68dzintra If you understand what is being said in these videos and it's clear to me because it is the point of this whole video , then you realize it is saying that EVERYTHING IS RELATIVE, it behaves according to the observer. (My upper caps were only meant for emphasis). How did you miss that?
celestian1111 3 months ago
@celestian1111 Relativity presumes that the objects being observed are separate from the observer. Quantum mechanics understands that the objects are dependent upon being observed. The latter is not relative but causative. Science has already delved into Plasma physics and toroidal physics as well. Relativity has gone the way of the dinosaurs.
WalkinLA 3 months ago
@WalkinLA I appreciate your semantic insight. I had forgotten what I replied to and went back to read it. I think my rhetoric had to do with the person's point that philosophy was relative but science is exact, right/wrong, which is not what these revelations are indicating. But you are right, when an observer changes the outcome, it is causative. However, they do talk about the electrons at diff ends of universe not requiring travel b/c they are indeed, still connected. Good stuff!
celestian1111 3 months ago
@celestian1111 I think we can assume we are in both places contrary to what our senses are telling us....which is really weird but our minds for now can travel places that our bodies cannot follow. A perfect analogy is any measure. We invent a measure which causes something to formally exist, catalog & label it, dissect it & build museums to showcase our genius, but what to do with light & other intangibles? We have burrowed our way back to source & must engage BOTH the inch & the yardstick.
WalkinLA 2 months ago
@WalkinLA If what you say is true, then Relativity is right. Objects are NOT dependent upon being observed. What I find appalling is how so many people with inquiring minds resort to some bullshit Dr. Quantum video rather than read an actual Physics book.
Mick0722MX 3 months ago
can someone please explain this to me?
eirikmurito 3 months ago
@eirikmurito Time is a function of position, temperature and entropy, dependent upon observation. Given that at any moment, an infinite array of expressions are possible, upon looking, one expression results that we co-create. Carl Sagan suggested that the Universe creates life in order to know itself. We learn of who we are and what life is by looking and choosing and as such, many options becomes one, discernible experience and time is how we measure each new frame of that experience.
WalkinLA 3 months ago
Does this power of observation only pertain to humans?
ChuckleKing 3 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
What don't understand about superposition is how do objects like machines, for instance, even operate independent of our observation.
When we start a car, we're not observing the engine itself, but it still operates independent of our observation. Say, would the car engine be in superpostion? How does superposition explain this? May someone fill me in?
AstralEtheric 3 months ago
@AstralEtheric This is a great question. Do the laws of physics only pertain to the organic? It seems there must be a place that is neutral, like the grounding post of an electrical outlet, that is neither positive of negative but somehow resides between the dynamic force of Nature. Machines are surrogates that operate independent the vital energies that cause plants to grow and cause our hearts to beat. According to Marshall McCluhan, technology reflects isolated parts of ourselves.
WalkinLA 3 months ago
@AstralEtheric conscious awareness that the machine is there may be an answer. Observing using more than just a visual translator for reality.
G04i77A2 3 months ago
@AstralEtheric Simple enough. It's because superposition has nothing to do with machines and engines running independent of observation. Superposition has nothing to do with an observer. These videos that make such suggestions are nothing more than new age quackery.
Mick0722MX 3 months ago
@Mick0722MX
Hmm, well then, simply, what is super position?
AstralEtheric 2 months ago
@AstralEtheric Simply, superposition is when a particle (electron) exists in all its particular, theoretically possible states (configuration of its properties).
Mick0722MX 2 months ago
Of* Sorry about the type-o, my ipod has auto-correct.
JamesoNTocksteiN 3 months ago
Infinite number or decimals, and 7-8-9 joke all at once lol!
JamesoNTocksteiN 3 months ago
@Imurry1 No way! I'm married to 6, but she's got an infinite amount of split personalities because she say the murder of 9 when she was younger :)
JamesoNTocksteiN 3 months ago
I am married to the number 5. She's very cool, actually. She enjoys pizza, walks in the park, and talking about quantum physics.
Imurry1 3 months ago
i love how science is slowly catching up with Hinduism.
maybe this means some time in the future atheists wont be such dumbasses.
topbluffa1 4 months ago
@topbluffa1 You're not very good at trolling. Try attempting to anger a larger group of people.
Fablefiend 4 months ago
@Fablefiend
not trolling at all.... i just know athiests need scientsts to prove the things i allready know thanks to hinduism... like they have allready done with the conservation of energy (reincarnation) and the fact that all thing are made of the same inpershiable essence (energy) and that that energy is ultmatly one (as proved by entanglement)
not to mention reality being a illusion, mulitple dimensions, and a ossilating universe .
topbluffa1 4 months ago
@topbluffa1 I think it's funny that despite metaphor of religion being applied to scientific discoveries post hoc, the validity of religion as a source of knowledge is still very low. Science seeks to falsify theories and any theories that don't get falsified are put to further tests. It is a philosophical process, not just a bank of knowledge. Even if Hinduism is 100% correct, it's not as valid as science as it doesn't make use of rigourous testing, it's all just assumed on faith.
henrywiltcher 3 months ago
Comment removed
topbluffa1 3 months ago
@henrywiltcher
wrong Hinduism goes under rigorous testing with people having different theories on the same matters just like in science the word Vedas (hindu holy books) means Knowledge ... modern science is just modern knowledge and is part of Hinduism also.
just remember Hinduism knew about a imperishable essence (as proves by the law of conservation of energ)that makes up all things (mass/energy) when science still thought things was destroyed when burned for example...
stop assuming.
topbluffa1 3 months ago
@henrywiltcher
not to mention such ideas as reality as a illusion, a oscillating or cyclic universe, energy and mass being the same thing (E=mc2) , and like i said the conservation of energy/mass and seeing through the illusion of a objectified reality or the false sense of being a individual separate from the multi-verse nor are you a tiny Part of that mulitverse you ARE Absolute reality and all parts/events are just concepts we have created.
topbluffa1 3 months ago
@henrywiltcher
"Measurement Problem - Reality is an Illusion"
this video and EVERYTHING the scientists say in it could be copy and pasted from the Vedas which are over 3000 years old..
get your head out of your ass... and research into concepts of god beyond a guy with a fluffy beard like you have seen depicted on the Simpsons or something.
topbluffa1 3 months ago
@henrywiltcher
and for your information science is a branch of philosophy
topbluffa1 3 months ago
@topbluffa1 I know science is a branch of philosophy. You clearly didn't read what I said very carefully though, I was talking about the process of acquiring knowledge, not the factual content of it. If you want to get really philosophical, the only thing we truly know is that we exist. I'm not trying to take away from the beauty of Hinduism, I'm just highlighting the fact that without scientific reasoning, all claims of the universes' existence is unsubstantiated and no better than myth.
henrywiltcher 3 months ago
@henrywiltcher
its called theoretical physics
topbluffa1 3 months ago
@henrywiltcher
and its a fact the ancient findings of the Vedas are now being backed up by MODERN science.
law of conservation.
discovery of energy.
discovery all mass is ultimately one .
plus much more. and why do you think Hinduism cant add to its knowledge like science does?
your basing your idea of a religion on the one you hate which im guessing is Christiana and it seems the only concept of god you know is a man with a fluffy beard.
topbluffa1 3 months ago
@topbluffa1 Let us not forget that Hinduism put men on the moon, helped produce all the electronic gizmos we have today, and is helping us find cures to diseases. Oh, wait a minute, that was science. My mistake.
allenu 2 months ago
@allenu
science is knowledge Vedas translates to knowledge so yes Hinduism did all those things not to mention the vedas are the root of scientific thought.
topbluffa1 2 months ago
@topbluffa1 Science isn't just "knowledge". It's a proven method for understanding the material world. Look up "scientific method". It sounds you want to believe that Hinduism is the source of modern science. Feel free to believe that if you wish, but you are insulting thinking people everywhere.
allenu 2 months ago
@allenu
go watch your beloved scientist Carl Sagan talk about Hinduism and also the vedas proclaim a oscillating universe and the idea of a substance that cannot be created or destroyed only converted that makes up all things..... sound familiar? Hinduism is approximately 7000 years ahead western scientists.
topbluffa1 2 months ago
I watch (or listen really) to this movie (What The Bleep: Down the Rabbit Hole) pretty much every day and it sure take more than one time for this information to really sink into your head...But the movie is amazing :)
PeaceLenah4 4 months ago
@PeaceLenah4 I would agree. Time is a difficult concept to grasp and understanding, difficult to measure. I am most intrigued by the manner in which our participation affects the outcome of an experience. I figure we all ought to pay closer attention to that to realize our true power and assume a grand responsibility in the big scheme of things. We study complex subjects and measure with sensitive technologies and often fail to realize these are merely reflections of who and where we are.
WalkinLA 4 months ago
@WalkinLA Exactly, but people probably won't agree with most consepts of quantum mechanics because we have grown up with everything already in place and they would probably assume that we fantisize all of thins since it seems so..Out of reach
PeaceLenah4 4 months ago
does this explain ghosts?
boondag 5 months ago
@boondag no, you are looking at ghosts lol
karim3343 5 months ago
brain! a herp! da f#%kin derp!
s694019001 5 months ago
He sounds like Ray Romano...
gmccut05 6 months ago
This is the closest to magic I've ever seen
aaronrocs 6 months ago
everything is ONE! except black ppl of course
brod2man 7 months ago
@brod2man -_____-
gangstamind187 6 months ago
LOL @ the shot of the random Indian with the stereotypical Indian voice.
MidnightCologne 8 months ago
What movie is this?
bmwm3cs 9 months ago
@bmwm3cs An excerpt from the documentary "What the Bleep". There does seem to be many additional short vids that came out after the actual documentary though. This may have been from one of the later releases.
WalkinLA 7 months ago
@bmwm3cs I see. I appreciate the post.
bmwm3cs 7 months ago
You gotta watch it a few times for the information to sink in. There is no time, only subjective selection. We are creating 'reality' and blaming it on others....
WalkinLA 1 year ago
THIS WAS AWESOME. I ran into this because of Prince Ea. haahhaa
OnABlackNight 1 year ago 4
@OnABlackNight LMAO!!!! Prince Ea makin smart cool
gangstamind187 6 months ago
This maked my brane broke :(
stolenmirth 1 year ago
@stolenmirth I sincerely hope you have recovered... LOL
WalkinLA 7 months ago 4