New engine for SU-35S

[spam1712]

vodka vodka boris yeltsin perestroika putin 12 more years!

[sertox12345]

usa plane have use that for a long time now lol  the trust turn

[thatoneguy12ize]

@sertox12345 the Russians used it first

[SuperBorisu]

19秒からの人が、ムスカにしか見えないｗｗ

[turbinepete1]

Looks like tools from Mechano set.

[thercpoop]

0:40 vodka

[sin646]

@thercpoop der amerikanische Schwein!

[thercpoop]

@sin646 Dank nazzi!

[Apollo13143]

What does "samalyota" mean ?

[antigvozd]

@Apollo13143 It means "plane"

[ShadowRSonic]

Russia: Ahead in fighter jet technology, behind in video quality.

[siddhathavanka]

@ShadowRSonic yhea cause russia spend its time on much more important things

[snehesten]

What are they saying?

[TheATheme]

@snehesten They say - see the information which is under the video.

[undertake782]

Avionics is most important now. They need to make this plane intelligent.

[glowingnipple]

can they be recycled?

[SilentEagles]

The 117S doesn't even have 3D Thrust Vectoring Controls. The 117S only have a new type of 2D thrust vectoring engine and Semi Super Cruise. Too bad Su-50 is end up using 117S so AL-41F have problem of the engines.

[woodman3451]

Хватит "штамповать" вооружение. Пора делать нормальный автомобиль, а не трясти елдой: "Вот такая пот у нас пиписка!"

[Mig29tvc]

@woodman3451

Nahuya nam mashini, kogda est VW, Audi, BMW i Honda? Na do tanki delat shtoby shtoby takie chmoshniki kak gruzini sosali doma. A amerikosi ne govorili kak nam v tualet hodit.

[coll565]

@woodman3451 ну так сделай,кто мешает? СССР распалось. дерзай, капиталист. А государство обязано защищать своих граждан.

[MegaPagon]

@woodman3451 naslushalsa Komikov v televizore? globus kupi shkolneg

[TheIntelligentQube]

I wish I could understand russian...

[tetramoo]

@TheIntelligentQube He said while in Holland they drink vodka and have each other in the ass, in Russia makes the best engines for the fighters:

[mshigorin]

@TheIntelligentQube well Russian is worth learning, Dostoevsky alone warrants it :)

[windbreaker14]

Imma firin mah lazer!!!!

[tadanorm]

is the su-35 a production modle of the su-37 ?

[pavel280488AA]

жесть один болт не закрутил и самолёт рухнет!!!!!!!!!!!

[Battlecorps101]

3D thrust vectoring, sweet :)

[pR05t0]

i like you americans wondering about our military tech^^

<you have good air craft too... i like the F-111 and the F-14 ... a pity they are retired

[mrmazda329]

@pR05t0

LOL, retired because its old tech. F-14 =70's and F111..lol

[pR05t0]

@mrmazda329 old is not always bad

[copehaha]

armchair engineers always fascinate me. Read a couple of facts on Wikipedia, and you suddenly know it all. The Americans did this, the Russians did this, this plane can do this, this plane cant do that, blah blah blah......fact is that there a things you dont and will never know.....idiots

[TheAxel4444]

HOLY SHIT!!!!

[PinotGB]

IMA FIRE MAH LAZER !!

[Frankdanny51]

is wonderful!!

[1337h4xx0rZ]

the only word I heard was Wodka, at 0:41

[kosiak10851]

no!

it is

"vot kadr"

[Orthodoxcrusader]

LOL!

[Vadimentor]

Он сказал, пока в голландии пьют водку и имеют друг друга в задницу, в России делают лучшие двигатели для истребителей :)

[Kaljakop]

@Vadimentor I really can´t find your letters on my keyboard.

[bhartha2007]

@1337h4xx0rZ

What is the word I am hearing here.....hmmm Burgers and obesity!

[1337h4xx0rZ]

what is the link between wodka, and obesity (hamburgers) ?

[plavins1]

su 35 looks kind like mig 29

[3dimon3]

Yes but bigger

[GIANNHSPEIRAIAS]

and 100 times mean

[kgbmi7]

jaja powertools jajaja is not a buick , requires precise maintenence , not even american mechanics use power toos on engines jajaja go ask bob villa to use craft toos on a f-18

[hispanicuscorpus]

a Northamerican would be with a powertool working on the engine,,the Russian still used the good old fashion wrench,,,,an inside look as the way Russian and NortAmerican thinks...

[profil4e]

your a retard...

[erniethefart]

the only su-35 built was crashed ages ago, they are long gona unless Sukhoi build another one which they probably will because it was a great war plane.

[diegoz2009]

A Sukhoi 35BM crashed in April, but there are another 3 prototypes,901,902 and 904.

[IronJackalTw]

NICE and AMAZING Vectored Thrust Engine! =)

[USAAIRPOWER]

Su-35 Super Flanker use Saturn/Lyulka AL-31FM turbofan!

[diegoz2009]

This vid shows the SU35BM that use 117S engines (AL-41F1A).

[ZOMETAMAS74]

Russian aircrafts are the most beautiful engineering on the world!

[HDUpload]

Very true, The SU47 Is BEAUTIFUL!

[maxispeed0]

/watch?v=-48cjWmhdCE

[BlinDonalts1]

У янок мазгов не хватит чтоб такой двигатель зделать, а ни еще в 70x паслали шпиона чтобы своровал миг 29 сваравали скапирововали суки

у них самих нету мазков все с снас капируют уебаны.

[Woodykrsk]

Родной язык выучил бы для начала, генитальный ты наш.

[titanic19]

Как приятно, когда тебя вдавливает в кресло и после 200-300 метров взмыть в небо при полезной нагрузке.

[JuusoMarttila]

How much?

[knollik]

ja pierdole ale toporne widzieliscie jak skrecali czesci (toporne) w siliku haha technologia jak za rewolucji przemyslowej w anglii hehehe

[1Avernus]

Zastanówmy się... taaak, umożliwienie naprawy ewentualnej usterki BEZ odsyłania do fabryki to zbędny dodatek, prawda? I co z tego, że osiągi tego silnika przewyższają konstrukcje zachodnie, ma śruby - więc jest zły. Gratulacje.

[knollik]

zastanow sie ...dzis o skutecznosci broni i mysliwcow nie decyduje to jakie ma osiagi silnik tylko dla ruskich niestety elektronika w dzisiejszych czasach calkowicie wystarczy jak samolot osiaga 2-2,5 macha oraz pokonuje bariere dzwieku bez dopalacza i tyle wazniejszy jest tez zasieg itp

[1Avernus]

W takim razie wyśmiewanie konstrukcji mechanicznej było nieco nie na miejscu, prawda?

tym bardziej, że "delikatny i subtelny" F-22 ma chociażby sterowanie wektorem ciągu prymitywniejsze niż MiG-35 czy Su-37.

[knollik]

nie prymitywniejsze tylko nie potrzeba takiego bajeru w dzisiejszym lotnictwie ani najblizszym

[1Avernus]

Amerykanie zainstalowali taki "bajer" w F-22, więc jest on widać potrzebny... A kiedy Rosjanie zainstalowali lepszy - nagle okazuje się być zwykłym gadżetem...

Generalnie Rosjanie postulują powrót do walki bezpośredniej - wobec coraz doskonalszych sposobów zakłócania rakiet - i wyrazem tej koncepcji jest położenie nacisku na manewrowość samolotów (co ciekawe nie cierpi na tym ani zasięg, ani prędkość czy udźwig)

[knollik]

oj dobra juz litosci! co ma ten wektor w f-22 do pokazuwek w stylu rosyjskim .. z tym zaklucaniem to pojechales ostro moze jeszcze powiesz ze rosja nie ma lotniskowcow poza ym 1 zlomem bo nie potrzebuje lub ma inna taktyke?? to mnie rozbawisz ostro... ps. o wekt. siliczku mozesz sobie gadac ale to nie zmienia ze ruscy sa w tylu za USA i tyle

[1Avernus]

Rozumiem, że konfrontacja TVC 2D z Raptora z rosyjskim TVC 3D może wywołać pewne kompleksy, ale nie usprawiedliwia lekceważącego zbywania faktów - a to, że w dziedzinie aerodynamiki i manewrowości pozostawili w tyle resztę świata do faktów należy.

Systemy ECM są coraz doskonalsze - i to kolejny fakt, który jak widać ciężko przyjąć do wiadomości. To, że Rosja przyjęła takie a nie inne wytyczne nie jest moim wymysłem.

Co do floty - klasyczny offtop.

[knollik]

ps. co ztego ze rosyjski ma 3d jak nawet nie zorientuje sie aRaptor go zdejmie...:)

[maxispeed0]

Wait for August 2009 ......

All will see

[MudRat02]

I can't wait - Pak-Fa: It will be the most advanced fighter jet in the world.

[maxispeed0]

Will the PAK FA best airplane in the world? That no one knows. Time will tell. But I believe that our engineers will create a unique aircraft.

[MudRat02]

Fair enough I suppose. Some basic stats have been revealed, and is very impressive in all areas, avionics and radar are top notch. I'd expect it to exhibit the same level of innovation as previous generations, should be great.

[twinoceans]

Anway, this is an awsome video. Thanks for sharing! Always been a fan of su-27 family than their US counterparts.

And people, by the way, stop the freaking immature "my dad is better than your dad" arguement! US had the money, so they put more into their technologies research, and the result is more advanced tech, so what? That does NOT mean Russian tech sucks. You don't have to turn a blind eye to history just because you're biased about your country.

[twinoceans]

The US already achieved 360% thrust vector with their f-16 VISTA back in the early 90's. Russia didn't fly its first 360% thrust vectoring engine in 2008. The reason why people so familiar with Russian thrust vector and not US: marketing. US did it for research purpose, Russia did it for selling purpose, so a lot of marketing went in there.

[gusinov]

BULLSHIT!!! the first Russian jet with 360 TVC was MIG-29 that produced un the 7X years after 20 years that US says that the TVC engine is a peace of shit in the 80-90 they spend millions of dollars to build they 180 TVC engine for the F-22 raptor

[twinoceans]

Go educate yourself shithead, and stop hilmiliate yourself by showing off your ignorance! The thrust vectoring engine was added later into the mig-29, dumbass. They did once in 1995 or so, unsuccessful, all the way until 2006. The US built it into f-16 and f-18 in late 80's to early 90's. This is fact, it's your choice to choose to be ignorant and deny historical facts, but prapared to get laughed at.

[EarlMcCrackin]

They didn't think 3D TVC was "shit", just that it didn't increase performance enough for the cost to install it on F-16 and F-15's. And for the record, NASA tested 3D TVC on the F-16 in the early 90's.

[nuznik]

you are wrong the germans make the best toyes :P

[adias111]

The pilots have a targeting crosshair in helm too, like the super-hornets pilots. This plane is dangerous...

[adias111]

This plane is capable of knock out a f-16 before he notice in radar.... and has rear missile, interesting no? You think Russians are sleeping? cmon(...)

[joaofga123]

haha and the AIM-120D?

[IsraeliXdude]

People! in the age of full sphere air to air missile who give a fuck about vector thrust ! you dont have to be behind the target to shoot it down, you may as well be in front of the target and still take it down...

[joaofga123]

I read comments by the Sukhoi fanboys everywhere that "The F-22 only has 2D-TVC, some Sukhois have 3D-TVC, so therefore the sukhoi is superior blah blah blah etc".... but I am wondering, does it really even matter? Does a 3D nozzle offer that much of a maneuvering ability over a 2D nozzle? or any at all?

Also, to add, why exactly does the F-22 have a 2D-TVC and not a 3D? So, far, I have come up with:

Continue.....

[joaofga123]

Also, to add, why exactly does the F-22 have a 2D nozzle and not a 3D one? So, far, I have come up with:

1) It was not a requirement for the ATF project

2) The technology was too new at the time in the late 1980's for the YF-22

and

3) The 2D nozzle design is stealthier. The F-22's 2D-TVC system works in such a way that it creates a much lower IR signature by cycling exhaust gases back over the tail of the jet and down into slots above the engines. This would not be possible with a 3D TV design.

[valeriyvyskribov]

The F-22 is designed the way it is for stealth at the cost of manueverablity. I like the F-22, but I would feel safer in a dogfight in a modern sukhoi or mig. Plus they are more fun to fly. Not that I've ever flown in one :<

[joaofga123]

The F-22 have a good manuverability too,you can't compare a MiG-29OVT with a f-22, this MiG-29OVT don't pass of a MiG-29 with 3D trusth vectoring,in avionics and technology the USAF is 10 years to the front,comparisons as this don't make sense :/

[valeriyvyskribov]

That's true, you can't compare a mig-29 with an f-22 but an su-30 or su-35 has better manueverability. maby even the su-27. The f-22 doesn't even have canards which gives the su's the advantage.

[F22Ownage]

F-22 can sustain a 9g turn at speeds above mach 1. The next closest is the Eurofightet at 7.8g, then the Su-35 at 7.2g's. However the su-35 does have a slightly faster roll rate at speeds around 400 kts. Dog fights are unlikely these days, f-22 would have little if no resistance to any current fighter.

[aflads]

F-22 appeared suddenly. Quickly passed above the field of the air field, sharply, "ñâå÷îé", went away in sky, hung up on a second and became "ïàäàòü", as well as our Su-30 during model flights. But in place of the showy loosening from a side aside, as if "ëèñò on vetru", as it does the Russian destroyer,

[aflads]

part1

[joaofga123]

what the fuck are you saying? did you use a translator???

[aflads]

komon you understud thet i wrote

[aflads]

"Õèùíèê" broke away in a cork-screw, included forcing and took off from the area of visibility of audience. Returning in sight was marked brandname "ñóõîâñêîé" by a piece is an acceleration and braking of fuselage all plane ...

[aflads]

part 2 koments of rus konstruktors from aeroshow

[qwerty20001q]

before you go any further I should say this:

F22 is a 10 years old outrageously expensive piece of CRAP! so dont embaras yourself here

[F22Ownage]

What does that make the Russian death traps then? Since the f-22 is unchalleneged by any other aircraft.

Moron...

[joyfulvulture]

F22Ownage... look at your fucking name idiot, who cares about your biased opinion.

[F22Ownage]

LOL moron...

You seem to care alot since you replied. LOL!

[joyfulvulture]

i care about your stupid attitude, not your opinion, but of course your simple brain cant make the difference.

[F22Ownage]

Niether your opinions nor your feeling matter to me, so why are you even bothering to reply?

LOL, Dumbass

[joyfulvulture]

the irony... get a brain.

[cablebeach1]

Well in order for him to type he MUST have a brain. I know you don't mean that literally

[RealNarod28]

:)) yeah yeah, F22 sucks:) old plane...

Russia have planes better then F22... much better.

[Phar2Rekliss]

I keep hearing people say that the su-37 has thrust vectoring. THE F-22 DOES TOO. COME ON PEOPLES.

[alexisss00]

F-22 has rather primitive vectoring - only 1 axis and both of engines work together. New Su-35, like Mig-29OVT and Mig-35 has 3D trust vectoring with independent control for each engine.

[EarlMcCrackin]

That's true, but due to its control surfaces, the F-22 can rotate 360 degrees so there was no real need for a multi-axis thrust vector system. Especially at the cost of rasing IR signature.

[DINDRAGON]

Last comment. Dogfight F-22A vs Su-37: F-22A WINS!

Dogfight F-22A+ vs Su-35BM: ????

I DO think that the S-117 engine really fixed the main disadvantage of the Flanker and thrusted it in a whole new era. It propably has the potential to throw the Raptor off the skyes after close quarter fight, yet I think that is yet to be seen... Soon we'll know...

[DINDRAGON]

yet in light of true dogfights the Raptor's better thrust to weight ratio and generally its lighter weight, gives it better energy-conservating maneuvering which is the real critical factor for aerial combat in general (and especially in close quarter combat)....

[bluehound35]

This new su-35 cant be more maneuverable than the mig-29ovt can it?

[DINDRAGON]

I think if a tech-equivalent to the

Su-35BM's S-117 engine

is installed to the new Fulcrum

it will most propably have a better TTW ratio and being of similar design with the really heavier Flanker it will most propably be quite more agile.

[DINDRAGON]

I do believe that the aerodynamic design of the Flanker family is more sophisticated than the fugly (for stealth purposes) Raptor and its acrobatic skills are far more impressive (mainly for show-off purposes),and I am a fan of the flanker...

[DINDRAGON]

Yeah yeah I know... The never-ending cold war between the soviet-aircraft- demonstrations lovers end proud patriotic former USSR citizens VS the Yankee we-do-the-best-kick-ass-warmac­hines and their militaristic letta-blast-the-fokkin-commies­-back-to-the-stone-age symbiots...

As I consider myself an objective third-point observer, being an inhabitant of Greece let me give a more creditful opinion...

[freetime10]

Thrust vectoring is so awesome. I really don't like this plane though. Nothing beats the F-35 and F-22. Go American made fighters!

[Su37rulez]

F-22 sucks =D

[myokirayamato89]

thats right... hahahahh...

[Su37rulez]

F-22 sucks =D

[acheroncyc]

The F-22 and F-35 will be beaten eventually. Thats how technology works.

[Mig29tvc]

Like by RD-33MK but with more thrust and some 5th gen. stuffing.

[Wishbringer3]

Mig29, what plane is that in your profile picture?.. i remember having a model of that as a kid.. I really need to know im having flashbacks wow!.. thanks.

[Mig29tvc]

Its SU-47

[MiG29MOVT]

How many degrees can you turn it around?