@tpsisokayiguess Look up the YT video titled "WikiLeaks Release 1.0 (2/7)". Back in 2009, Assange did not dispute reports of "secondary blasts" during 9/11. Clearly he was more open-minded about 9/11 truth in 2009 than he was in 2010, when he became openly hostile towards the movement.
@tpsisokayiguess How is it that having ONE single 9/11 truther on a panel renders the reputation of everyone else on the same panel questionable? I guess it's because of comments like this that Assange gave into the pressure to openly dismiss 9/11 truth in 2010, considering his more open-minded stance on the issue in 2009.
Wikileaks is a great source for information. There is information that is kept from the public view that is essential to make decisions about certain policies and Wikileaks has done a great job doing so. The Copenhagen Conference failed thanks to wikileaks that would have had us all paying diabolically high carbon taxes killing millions in poorer countries while crippling the economies of the rest based on the unscientific sexing up of the IPCC's 2007 review which stems from the Royal Society.
@tpsisokayiguess That's how MI5 do it, they make people crazy and then no-one takes them seriously..... Also being scared for safety for long periods of time can lead to a paranoid break down.. By creating 'paranoid' symptoms (intimidation, mind games) total psychosis can be induced... Then he is discredited.. Don't grass on MI5 they aren't that bad...
@tpsisokayiguess Look up the YT video titled "WikiLeaks Release 1.0 (2/7)". Back in 2009, Assange did not dispute reports of "secondary blasts" during 9/11. Clearly he was more open-minded about 9/11 truth in 2009 than he was in 2010, when he became openly hostile towards the movement.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@tpsisokayiguess How is it that having ONE single 9/11 truther on a panel renders the reputation of everyone else on the same panel questionable? I guess it's because of comments like this that Assange gave into the pressure to openly dismiss 9/11 truth in 2010, considering his more open-minded stance on the issue in 2009.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
Wikileaks is a great source for information. There is information that is kept from the public view that is essential to make decisions about certain policies and Wikileaks has done a great job doing so. The Copenhagen Conference failed thanks to wikileaks that would have had us all paying diabolically high carbon taxes killing millions in poorer countries while crippling the economies of the rest based on the unscientific sexing up of the IPCC's 2007 review which stems from the Royal Society.
dvalentino007 1 year ago
@tpsisokayiguess That's how MI5 do it, they make people crazy and then no-one takes them seriously..... Also being scared for safety for long periods of time can lead to a paranoid break down.. By creating 'paranoid' symptoms (intimidation, mind games) total psychosis can be induced... Then he is discredited.. Don't grass on MI5 they aren't that bad...
bonniekwacha 2 years ago
thanks!
chipko 2 years ago