who are you uninformed people who think rhythmic integrity is a wanted desirable .Artifice includes all the tricks.LISTEN TO PADEREWSKI DEPACHMANN never over does it and I wish he would.I must hear Leschetitzky and other pianists born before 1860's cuz they knew PERFORMING STANDARDS of 19thcentury music-LIKE OPERA IT NEEEEEDS this!It was already bad taste by the time Sauer was making records.W e have been deprived of this correct performing tradition.I LOVE IT!
what a tempo & so clean and he has charm so few do now.you better rubato and change tempi and add when u play 19th cent music.crazy peole dont and they are so boring.hear.Sauer for charmwithout annoyances and hear HOFMANN ,Cherkassy PADEREWSKI for pure Charm.
Rubato is a matter of taste, but basic rhythmic integrity is not. And that's what's lacking here. Wild plays one tempo initially, then at 14 he plays a different and slower one, at 20, he goes back to faster, at 26 to slower. The same thing happens over and over again (for example, 1:17 and 1:22; 2:12and 2:19), without musical rhyme or reason. "eddopianist" already noted this below. Peter Nero plays this better because he keeps the overall rhythmic pulse of the piece alive throughout.
it sounds like he parks the melody around 36/37.. not an intentional lengthening of the note for musical purposes.. I've heard enough of this piece. Volodos does it best because he makes it sound like he doesn't have to work so hard.. more fluid sounding technique.
(wild starts fast at the beginning, but if you listen carefully, you hear him slow down. The recording of Horowitz I was talking about is a cd recording, not one of YouTube's)
Hey ibclappin - gotta agree with you. I've heard Wild in recital, and he's no schlepp. Let's remember that for years the only thing we knew about him was that he had recorded a VERY fine performance of "Rhapsody in Blue" and not much else. Let's get some perspective here..."Entincelles" is just a fluff encore piece, but he pulls it off in great style
I'd have to say Wild and Horowitz are close. Wild is probably a little more adventuresome, maybe pushing the limits of speed and control more. His transcriptions show an immense talent.
I disagree with you- it is neither too loud nor too fast. Moszkowski wrote the tempo indication as "Allegro scherzando," which would literally translate as "Playfully happy." Musically, it would indicate fast and playfully. Wild's technique, despite his age, is astonishing.
And if you think this is too fast, you should hear Vladimir play it. In Mr. Wild's traverse of this, notice the very spare pedalling, achievable only by the greatest of artists. Amazing performance, even disregarding his age.
perhaps you should listen to Vladimir again. He does NOT play it LOUD in the least - close your eyes and imagine a lovely fire in a fireplace with dancing sparks.
Perhaps you need your ears or your computer volume checked.
listen to pletnevs perfomance
csportalcomua 4 months ago in playlist earl wild
Sounds like a bad practice session to me. Peter Nero owns this piece
mrpolaroid123 11 months ago
uhh - you ever heard of rubato? There are fine dynamic shifts and tempo
contrasts which make this interpretation a lightly exciting pleasure to listen
to - much like the movement of sparks careening and falling in the night air.
This is masterful playing!
rdoister 11 months ago
Passionate, bold interpretation.
mylovelylittleone 1 year ago
0:37 is one of most disgusting things ice heard im sorry.
668JunKi 1 year ago
@668JunKi
your right indeed.
indahan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@668JunKi your right indeed.
indahan 1 year ago
@668JunKi your right indeed
indahan 1 year ago
I really admire Earl Wild and this is a wonderful MM
bon-bon. But this video shows EW in a less than fully
flattering light. I wish somebody would post his recording
of the Rach Chopin Variations, which is superb.
jghancockjr 2 years ago
Remarkable! RIP.
gigantibyte 2 years ago
who are you uninformed people who think rhythmic integrity is a wanted desirable .Artifice includes all the tricks.LISTEN TO PADEREWSKI DEPACHMANN never over does it and I wish he would.I must hear Leschetitzky and other pianists born before 1860's cuz they knew PERFORMING STANDARDS of 19thcentury music-LIKE OPERA IT NEEEEEDS this!It was already bad taste by the time Sauer was making records.W e have been deprived of this correct performing tradition.I LOVE IT!
lovesGenet 2 years ago
what a tempo & so clean and he has charm so few do now.you better rubato and change tempi and add when u play 19th cent music.crazy peole dont and they are so boring.hear.Sauer for charmwithout annoyances and hear HOFMANN ,Cherkassy PADEREWSKI for pure Charm.
lovesGenet 2 years ago
One of the greats!
rbhood2468 2 years ago
wow never heard of this work before, havent really gotten into moszkowski yet but it sounds so familiar....
bagdad4 3 years ago
who in u.s. cares about wrong notes?
just balls and rubato some brilliant scales and lets see what happens...
becktie 3 years ago
怀尔德不愧是大师,细微之处他都
体现了出来
hyf199003 3 years ago 3
Rubato is a matter of taste, but basic rhythmic integrity is not. And that's what's lacking here. Wild plays one tempo initially, then at 14 he plays a different and slower one, at 20, he goes back to faster, at 26 to slower. The same thing happens over and over again (for example, 1:17 and 1:22; 2:12and 2:19), without musical rhyme or reason. "eddopianist" already noted this below. Peter Nero plays this better because he keeps the overall rhythmic pulse of the piece alive throughout.
123mortimer 3 years ago 4
@123mortimer i think he wants to change the rythm cos he does it on places eas to play...its purposedly....
dukedome 9 months ago
there is a small mistake in 1:00, but very good performance
fosco85 3 years ago
That was great. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Gerard
gerardz82 4 years ago 2
Because someone can play everything does not mean that they should.
TsuQ 4 years ago
That's killer.
rekar1 4 years ago
it sounds like he parks the melody around 36/37.. not an intentional lengthening of the note for musical purposes.. I've heard enough of this piece. Volodos does it best because he makes it sound like he doesn't have to work so hard.. more fluid sounding technique.
TICETOCAR 4 years ago
Its not too fast for those who 'compare' it with horowitz. Horowitz plays it less slow. Wild plays lots of Rubatos.
eddopianist 4 years ago
(wild starts fast at the beginning, but if you listen carefully, you hear him slow down. The recording of Horowitz I was talking about is a cd recording, not one of YouTube's)
eddopianist 4 years ago
Hey ibclappin - gotta agree with you. I've heard Wild in recital, and he's no schlepp. Let's remember that for years the only thing we knew about him was that he had recorded a VERY fine performance of "Rhapsody in Blue" and not much else. Let's get some perspective here..."Entincelles" is just a fluff encore piece, but he pulls it off in great style
willyum39 4 years ago
I'd have to say Wild and Horowitz are close. Wild is probably a little more adventuresome, maybe pushing the limits of speed and control more. His transcriptions show an immense talent.
seemefeelme62 4 years ago 2
this is a good performance. don't compare it with Horowitz, no one has his sensitive touch. don't put down other pianists because of it.
ibclappin 4 years ago 2
somebody needed to hit the practice rooms for at least an hour or two before performing, even though it turned out alright i guess
derhawk 4 years ago
It's way to loud and fast I think.
Horowitz3053 5 years ago
If you think this is too loud and fast, you should hear Volodos play it.
mcmilld1 5 years ago 2
@mcmilld1 It's supposed to be sparks
BalletBabyBoy 5 months ago
I disagree with you- it is neither too loud nor too fast. Moszkowski wrote the tempo indication as "Allegro scherzando," which would literally translate as "Playfully happy." Musically, it would indicate fast and playfully. Wild's technique, despite his age, is astonishing.
RyanPatrick2001 5 years ago
And if you think this is too fast, you should hear Vladimir play it. In Mr. Wild's traverse of this, notice the very spare pedalling, achievable only by the greatest of artists. Amazing performance, even disregarding his age.
smokesignal416 5 years ago
perhaps you should listen to Vladimir again. He does NOT play it LOUD in the least - close your eyes and imagine a lovely fire in a fireplace with dancing sparks.
Perhaps you need your ears or your computer volume checked.
John19182004 4 years ago