I was surprised that you did no make any mention of Isandlwana. That is a true humiliation of the British Military. A modern army with cannons and rifles defeated by an army of spear and shied wielding Zule warriors. That is far more worthy of a list of British military humiliations than half of what you've mentioned.
Battle of Chesapeake could have been much better handled by the British. The Royal Navy was still facing a superior number foe - the French having 24 the British having 19 - but it was Grave's poor command decision which led to the failure.
Defeat in the Battle of Chesapeake could be considered humiliating but the surrender of Cornwallis at Yorktown cannot.
Saratoga - to take a line from another, more famous battle - was a close run thing. The British came very close to winning it. If not for Benedict Arnold's late attack the battle would have been, at the very least, a draw. The British lost 7,200 in the first battle and 6,600 in the second while the Americans lost 9,000 in the first battle and over 12,000 in the second battle. This Battle was far from a humiliation for anyone.
Bunker Hill was not a humilation for the British military. It was a victory - a pyrrhic one in which the British lost more than they gained but it was still a victory. The British soldier bravely marched forwards against an enemy that held the high ground and were entrenched. It stands as a testament to poor British Generalship but bravery of the British soldier.
Fort Carillion was a failure and humiliation because of the British Commander Abercombie allowing the battle to be fought piecemeal with frontal assaults - that tactic never works against a fortified position. It was like Ambrose Burnside at Fredericksburg. Madness. The failure is entirely on Ambercombie's shoulders but despite the cohesion the British Army was not broken, it lost about 13% of its manpower and could still have been an effective force under a different commander.
Mononaghela was a failure due to Braddock and the British being unprepared for war on the North American Continent and, in particular, the style of warfare employed by the Indians. in open battle the British proved superior but as the Indian's resorted to ambushes in trees the British could not counter it. Add to that the inexperianced draftees which made up the bulk of Braddock's army and that was a recipe for disaster.
The British loses suffered at Saint Cast were not unusual for any amphibious operation. It was failure of planning and training but in execution it was pretty much your every day amphibious landing of the time. The French were very strong on the coast and they reacted very well to the operation. All in all it was a waste of British time, money and lives and was a major humiliation but it was nothing unsual for its kind of operation. Once more you seem to ignore the event that led to the loses.
Cartegena de Indias was indeed a humilation for the British. A lot of it was down to illness. Disease swept through the British ranks accounting for the vast majority of deaths suffered. Once again a failure of the commanders to work together contributed to the failure as well. However you do convienantly decide to ignore the fact that the Spanish lost all their ships, lost 5 forts, 395 cannons and around half their manpower as well so it was far from a one sided event.
At Lagos Tourville had 70 Ships of the Line - the most powerful ships available to any fleet - while the Anglo-Dutch fleet had a mere 13 between them. This was no battle, it was slaughter. The superiority of the French fleet in firepower was supreme and uncontestable. Yet still Tourville failed to prevent the Anglo-Dutch fleet getting past him and getting their merchants to Spain. 110 merchant men escaped the French Fleet and the majority of the Anglo-Dutch Ships of the Line escaped.
The French by 1690 had supassed the Dutch as the most powerful Naval force in the known world and at the battle of Beachy Head outnumbered the combined Anglo-Dutch fleet by 19 ships. This gave the French a clear advantage in number and firepower. Additionally the Anglo-Dutch Commanders failed to work together and the was English commander dispositioned the combined fleet was poor.
At the time of the Second Anglo-Dutch War the United Provinces that made up the Netherlands were a stronger military force than England was and the Dutch Navy was the most powerful in the world. They sailed 60 ships up the Thames and to oppose this mighty fleet the Royal Navy could muster less than 10. The victory of the Dutch in this endeavor was inevitable.
English losed in the English Armada are estimated at 11,000 killed wounded or captured. It was a humilation and once more a failure of leadership and command decisions. Drake being a pirate was both useful and useless at differing times, and the decision to uselessly and unsuccessfully besiege Corruna allowed the Spanish time to recover. The Spanish fleet was still more powerful than the English at that time despite the failed Spanish Armada. Stormy weather also contributed to the failure.
Of course, calling the Hundred Years War an "Epic Fail" for England kind of ignores the fact that Henry V had France on its knees and would have been crowned King of France had he lived a but longer and that England was self-destructing due to Henry IV being a total waste of spacewhen the French managed to drive the English out of France (except Calais). All in all the Hundred Years War had both good and bad points for the English.
Once again your argument for Castillion is based on casualties and not events. Talbot had recieved information that the French were fleeing their fixed fortifications and he hastilly organized a chase onto to find the information was false and the French were strongly invested, he attacked anyway, made no headway, then a Bretonic Cavalry force arrived attacked Talbot's flank and destroyed/routed the English. A failure of Talbot's command but not a humilation where seiges are concerned.
Your obsessed with casualties but ignore the events of the battle that led to those casualties being taken. At Formigny the English Army of 4,000 fought a French Amy of 5,000 French and 1,200 Breton's and it was the Breton's late arrival which won the Battle for the French. Unlike Patay the English fought until their position became untenable and held their own against a superior numbered foe.
Patay was a humiliation but not because of the disparity of casualties. It was a humilation because the English gave away their positions to the French, weren't properly prepared for the battle and lost command cohesion when the battle began - due to the failure of Talbot and Fastolf to work together.
You state Frech loses as La Brossiniere as "1 Knight and some others" as if the others were insignificant. The amount of foot soldiers lost by the French in that battle are unknown so we cannot compare those loses to the English ones. Furthermore the French outnumbered the English at that battle by over a thousand and had been caught unprepared by the French when the battle began. Hardly a humilation.
The claim that the English lost 400 Knights and 8,000 soldiers at La Rochelle comes from Cesaro Fenandez Duro - a Castillian Naval historian - but these claims are unsourced. Duro claims that all those men were captured but does no factor in those killed. J.W. Sherbourne and Antony Tuck state that the only recorded estimates for loses in this battle were 800 deaths and betwenn 120 and 400 prisoners. Once again you picked a battle where loses are uncertain and unproven.
The losses suffered during the Battle of Old Byland are also in debate due, once more, to conflicting evidence. And again the battle cannot count as a humilation in British Miliary history for the same reason Bannockburn cannot count. If your going to list battles fought between races that would make up part of the British Military in the future then you might as well list the Battle of Hastings as a humilating British defeat or even the Battle of Brunanburh.
Similarly the military of modern day Britian is part English, Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish. As such the British military can claim heritage from both sides of the Scottish Wars of Independence. The victory of the Bruce over the useless Edward II is in no was a humiliation for the British military.
English loses at Bannockburn are estimated to be between 4,000 and 11,000, conflicting reports make the actual number uncertain. Scottish loses at the battle are also uncertain and estimated to be between 400 and 4,000. It was a battle between Robert the Bruce, King of Scots, and Edward II King of England. It can hardly count as "Her Majesty's humilation" not least of which because the current Monarch is only distantly related to both the Plantagenet and Bruce families.
@philippesella 1066, ils n'addmetrent jamais que la conquete a eté française.et inventent plusieurs des excuses pour nier ça. Des Plantagenet ont eté des nobles Français qui ont governé l'Angletérre par 400 ans :p
sorry guys i never heard of these battles n "victories" all i know is i rate the Russians first n the British second of all the military powers on earth they r the only two that have fought many bales against the ODDS n won all others are way behind we own them our freedom for the batle of Britain n the battle of staligrad both won on bravery tenacity n sucrifies against overwhelming firepower n numbers n to me This is bravery winning with numbers n firepower on u r side proves nothing
Not just battle of cartagena de indias was the second most humillating battle for the british (behind Singapur). During the war of jenkins ear, the spanish captured over 500 english ships...
What was it King Philip said after Drake buggered the Armada? mmm "thee eengleeesh av a fuck-ed us again! ay carammba!. Then we went on to do beat you AND the French every time you forgot your oily places. We also took all your colonies off you and the gold off your ships and now your people live in shanty towns in rotten jungles killing each other for access to the nearest piss - hole. Fitting I believe.
@lahire666 whilst I hate the english as much as everyone else here I would not include William III invasion and attribute it as part french. The French crown was essentially catholic and undoubtedly opposed the Dutch Protestant invasion of catholic england...not too many huguenots fro france either
@jeffkodiac NO, NOT 1066, I'm talking about the dutch invasion of 1688. Sorry, I should have specified, of course the french supported normandy, I'm saying the crown didnt support the protestants
@druisten3 Je crois que ta loyauté envers Vichy est mal placé. On doit comprendre que les français a eu le choix, ils pourraient continuer la guerre contre les allemands ou rester avec leur maître qui s'appelle Adolf Hitler. C'est ridicule que types comme toi nous critique à cause de tes leaders faibles! L'attentat sur la flotte française était juste, contre l'axe du mal.
I think this was al thrown together by a seven year old retard. Le grand bollox. Funny it never mentions Crecy, Agincourt, Waterloo or Trafalgar. V le fingers from le roast bouf.
I don't give a shit, no matter how many "humiliating" defeats Britain suffered, this country still went onto control a quarter of the world's land area. And that is something no other country and even try and belittle. Cry more faggots.
@InglouriousBasterds5 FRANCE it's not coward, you re country is it,if you re british: you lost the independance war of USA and you became the SLAVE,the pretty dog of USA, all your industry it's american,your nuclear missile=american not UK,you aren't European,you re the "51 state" of USA . don't forget FRANCE kick your ass all the time you'll want. remember the french missile"EXOCET"in "falkland war". Your state want to unit UK military power with FRANCE.So shut up "ROSBEEF"
@LoderVonshtect FRANCE it's not coward, you re country is it,if you re british: you lost the independance war of USA and you became the SLAVE,the pretty dog of USA, all your industry it's american,your nuclear missile=american not UK,you aren't European,you re the "51 state" of USA . don't forget FRANCE kick your ass all the time you'll want. remember the french missile"EXOCET"in "falkland war". Your state want to unit UK military power with FRANCE.So shut up "ROSBEEF"
@InglouriousBasterds5 it's WRONG !! FRANCE didin't loose the WW1 but FRANCE lost WW2 BUT FRANCE get a fierce RESISTANCE to help the allied to get the best information to UK and USA
@InglouriousBasterds5 LOL! In WW1 French saved the alied effort in Balkans and in maind front against germans. French victories like 1st Marne, 2nd Marne, Verdun etc saved the allied.
At jangi fett,you hate French people,you will never say that France has won. a victory,well I got news for you,shut the fuck up,son of whores ,son of a bitch.we french won battles,France is the oldest country in Europe .bnp fucker... Brits are nothing but worthles trash. ,and to amercians.we fukin helped you in the 7 years war,if it was not us,.the USA would not exist !!!
history is written by the winner, that is why france's history books are so empty. so what, they won battles but the british won wars, a total of 87 to 89 wars if my mind serves me correctly. don't worry, france is a good second with something like 60 wars won, then its italy and then its russia. so, keep your battle victories and we british will keep our WAR victories.
Yeah we keep our victory in YORKTOWN ( US independence). for example.For your knowledge,there were 3 times more French than American in YORKTOWN battlefield.
@chris25fr like i said, your listing a battle. and the fact that england was facing off against 3 sides during the american revolution sort of made the conflict one sided. but what it proved is that it needed 3 countries to win a war aginst the british empire.
@chris25fr i couldnt give a crap about yorktown, more's to the point, neither did Lord Cornwallis. so where was france during the war of 1812, oh yeah, getting owned by the British in the Nepolionic war.
@jeffkodiac really? you sure? i think the french had more pressing matters, such as the napolionic war. france couldnt do what britain di, that was fight 2 wars at the same time.
Battle of New Orleans , Jean Lafitte and his men . Man you are funny with your arrogance in the history in the majority of battles between France and England , the French was alone against the English with allies .
@jeffkodiac i could not emphasise more on how much shit i do not give. and not quite, spain was with u during the napolionic wars, if france had an ichy scrotum, spain would scratch it for you. and just look what happened at traffalgar. like bricks your ships sank.
You are funny again in the French revolution wars and Napleonic wars you fought the French behind all great European monarchies . Before 1812 the French was pratically alone against all the European monarchies . In the war of the first coalition Spain was allied with the English and others countries , the English and their allied and the Spanish attacked the French on 2 front and what happened at Fleurus and San Lorenzo .....
@jeffkodiac refer to previous comment, i honestly dont care any more, look out you window, there is a world out there. i suggest you step away from your computer and go out for a while. the world doesn't need morons like you correcting everybody at every toss and turn, so what i was wrong, i dont give a crap. i didnt say i hated the french, i just hate french people like you.
What a kind of retarded hypocritical you are ? Remember your first comment " history is written by the winner , that is why France 's history books is so empty " the world doesn't need pathetic troll as you who spend their time to stir up hatred . And tell me when i have said that i hate the English ?
@jeffkodiac the fact is its vids like this that are retarded, no country is perfect and thats a fact, mores to the point that france showed its true colours during the second world war, and i never said you hated the english, i couldnt care if you do, i'm not gonna lose sleep over it. i was just stating a point. and troll? what are you seven? the reason why i said that is because france doesn't have what the world calls a famous victory, or that the world just doesn't give a shit about france.
Man the fact is that the English have better propaganda than the French and especially since 2003 when the American have decided to rool in shit their oldest allies France . "not famous victory " huh !! Vouillé 507, Poitiers 732 , Hasting 1066 , Jerusalem 1099, Bouvines 1214 , Formigny 1450 , Castillon 1453 , Rocroi 1643 , Valmy 1792 , Rivoli 1797 ,Marengo 1800 , Ulm 1805 , Austerlitz 1805 , Iena 1806 , Friedland 1807 , Malakoff 1855 , Magenta 1859 etc...
@jeffkodiac what ever, i dont care any more, i know and admit that there are aspects of my country that are absolute balls, but what makes me see that is that i dont have my head stuffed up my arse like a frenchman. and hastings was a norman victory, normans where not french, they are desendants of the dutch and saxons. the only reason why france thinks hastings was a french victory is because the invasion was launched from france.
Wrong , in fact Hasting was a Franco-Norman victory . After several generation the Normans had become French . The Norman were mixed with the French local population more numerous , the Norman adopted the language of the French , the tradition of the French , culture and religion of the French , the Norman adopted also military tactics of the French .
@jeffkodiac you just dont get it, not one bit. i have mentioned it before and i'm gonna mention it again. i dont care, who gives a shit. get your head out the history books will you and do something with your life instead of tearing of someones head who doesnt have the compleate picture you knobarse, i dont care about history, come to mention it, i dont care about french history, they have done nothing for this world and they never will.
I undestand that the truth hurt you . " i don't care about history " so what you make on this video little hypocritical . " they have done nothing for the world " they only changed your useless country for long time lol .. . Me i did not care about the English the only thing that is interesting with the English is their enormous capacity in the bragging .
The English make the same kind of video about the French , the English even created song about French , the name of this song " why i hate the French " , pathetic !!!!
@jeffkodiac well d'oh me then for not seeing where the guy who made this comes from. seriously, why are we still arguing!? i dont give a crap anymore and you just seem to want to carry on.
If you're not interested in history do not coming on this kind of vidoe but i'm think you are interested by the history of France because i have seen many of your comment on the video where we talk about France history . But if you prefer say that you did not care about France history or France it's your problem .
@jangofett1234FRANCE it's not coward, you re country is it,if you re british: you lost the independance war of USA and you became the SLAVE,the pretty dog of USA, all your industry it's american,your nuclear missile=american not UK,you aren't European,you re the "51 state" of USA . don't forget FRANCE kick your ass all the time you'll want. remember the french missile"EXOCET"in "falkland war". Your state want to unit UK military power with FRANCE because it's expensive for U.So shut up "ROSBEEF"
@esprit83990 AHAHAHAH! the trident missile programme is most certainly british, we lost the war of independance because we were against 3 countries at once, it was the british that made the industrial revolution and no american resource was used but was brought by america, and the exocet? a bb gun of a missile. name me one war which france has won in the past 30 years.... you can't? oh, thats right, its cause you didnt. so right back at you "QUASSIONT"
@jangofett1234 No Wrong !! i'm sorry But the trident missile it's AMERICAN technology, because the maintenance of your missile,it's the FRENCH MILITARY going to made the maintenance, UK sign the contract of maintenance with the FRENCH Ministery of Defense, and the USA are uncomfortable because FRANCE will make the maintenance and it ll see the secret of the "trident".After on the EXOCET destroyed HSM SHEFFIELD, and an other ship and damaged the HSM YAMOUTH.
@esprit83990 2 frigates, nothing specail that whent down, and i say again, there were more british scientists working with the americans to develop an atomic weapon then there was americans. and it really isn't a maintenance pact we're signing, it's a pact that will bring continental europe closer to britain. and i doubt it would even last that long you ffffuckin arse.
@jangofett1234 yes of course But UK NEED the HELP of USA ,because your scientist need US scientists to make the "trident or polaris" missile you need the help of the US system , the difference with FRANCE our scientist needn't help USA to make the French nuclear missile. it's why FRANCE is the 3rd nuclear powerfull with MISSILE 100/100 made in france . it's real !
@jangofett1234, the Normans are not descendants from the Dutch. The Dutch didn't exist in that yet. The Normans were French by the time they invaded England, and they were also accompanied by many people from various regions of France. Angevins, Poitevins, Bretons, Flemish, etc...all fought at Hastings. Technically it is a French victory.
@expertstrategy i can not express more on how much i dont give a fuck. look, i'm trying to get it in to the dude below us head that i dont care anymore, yeah i was wrong ohhhhhhh. but the point is if it takes shit like that to get you lot to scurry from under your rocks then i may have been wasting my time. now go scurry back under that rock, i think you may crisp if you stay out in the light for too long.
Little hypocritical coward don't waste your time with me , the retarded troll who hiding behind a false identity like you don't interest me . Me i'm not a shitty coward like you i have the name of my country on my page and i am proud of that .
Huh !! You are here again retarded troll , you dont read my comment ?? You don't interest me , i'm think you have really a big problem in your head . You say that France never win a single war or battle so why you are always on the French video ? The smart people do not comment on what is uninteresting .
@OfficialFearClan "Everyone here would be speaking German" if there are not the Channel perhaps everyone would be speaking German and you too . " few English speak French " a great part of the English language come from the old French and French .
You say really anything , this video was not make by a French . And since the HYW the French alone have regularly beaten the English with their allies in many battles , Also remains polite . And if France is what you say , explain me why France is the largest tourism country in the world .
94KJordan you had made a mistake, maybe you want to say : "i love all the french " (le blabla qui suit ta réponse confirme juste la capacité cérébrale qui caracterise beaucoup d'anglo saxon ici et qui est proche du néant)
@LadyMary6996 australia are the killers of the aborigen people shame on you!!
violent histrory? you stupid and small history is mark by the crime and atrocity you had done to the real people of australia. go back to you uggly island and let the european speak about their long and nice history.
The Roman were a joke , they have conquered many lands yes but they fought only tribals and villages , we saw what happened whene they fought against unified peoples such as the Mongols or even the Gauls of Vercingetorix , he made julius ceaser himself shit in his pant LOL! But what is so funny it's whene you say " The French/Spanish/British previous empires doesn't even come close to what the Romans once had" Roman empire was the smallest ans the most pathetic lol ->
@LadyMary6996 "i say good things about British poms & their victorys, because i know for sure that Froggies like yourself won't be able to resist replying back!"
i say bad about british defeats because i like angry patriots i am not very patriot.
@LadyMary6996 I don,t understand you.You say that french,british and french are pathetic but you have written about the glorious battle of trafalgar, the wonderfull english language and call spanish people gypsies.?If you are not a really british patriot i hail you.
pd:Sorry for my english
pd2:In my opinion,chinese empire was more important and decisive in the history that roman empire
pd3:If you hate the british patriotism,i should you visit lordgeorgerodney,s channel.
" a trap " lol , i was right you are reallu a buffoon . If you in your pathetic life , you make the same thing i pity your family . "Violent history " yes it's true that speak about language is very violent lol . " all superior " sorry but for bragging the Australian are not bad and for xenophobia too . Good night miss marsupial ..
" a defeat " i don"t think so , the English language had become the vehicular language but not the official language of the countries , the French and Spanish language is alwyas speak in many country as official language . Elsewhere that is expected that the Spanish languae is the most spoken in US in 2050 .
What uncultivated person you are . the Romans make worst thing , when they invade Gauls they make a genocide on the Gallic people . Your country come from the English conquest and you what you make , you say that the English are bitter people pfff . And of course you don't know that the English and the French have invented hundreds of thing that you use in everyday life , thats thing that have made the modern world . You are really pitiful ..
And anthyller is not French retarded whore . I think you have a big problem in your head , you come here with your stupid arrogance , it's normal that Australian they make not this kinf of video , their history is a big joke . For your information the Brits the French and the Spanish created the modern world , And explain me what created the Australian , except kangourou hunting ..This is your county who are a clown country lol .
"Also embarassed themselves in the past " The English like you come regularly with their bragging and you tell that the French are bitter . Explain me why the French are bitter they have one of the most greatest military history . Losing the battle of Trafalgar , as i see you have selective memory you forget the battle of Cheasepeake . You forget one thing is that in majority of battle the French fight alone against the English with allies . And nevetheless the French win many .
first british invasion to afganistan in 1842.it Sent 200.000 soldiers and only one came back.ahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahaahaahahhahhahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhahahahahahahahahhahahahaha
@ANTIHYTLERS WW2-French have a massive line of forts from the south of belgium all the way to the bottom of germany`s left. What did the germans do? Invade belgium, go round, and destroy the forts from behind. "hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
hahahahahahahaha.Battle of el coronel (1914).In this battle fought the inexperienced german navy vs the most powerful navy in that time.The british royal navy.british casualities?1654 british died and 2 cruisers was destroyed..german casualities?0 deads and 0 ships destroyeds
@OfficialFearClan Oh that is just pathetic. Theres no such thing as the "battle of el coronel", youve just made it up off the top of your head. Why are you arguing anyway? our monarch queen victoria was German, and we had an alliance against the french for 200-300 years before that anyway. In retrospect, you`re an idiot.
@OfficialFearClan congratulations! you have learned my nationality!you won a car and 2 millions of pounds!
/the spanish supported the nazi,s so/ why do you think that i am nazi?I wrote about the british defeat in his invasion to afghanistan.am i a taliban?Your reasoning are ridiculous..you are british. are you a killer of indians, maoris, zulus,or irish catholics?I wrote about the battle of coronel and jutland because are 2 examples of a lot of british defeats in the sea and in the earth.
@ANTIHYTLERS -Im sure the spanish constiqaudors sat down and had a nice cup of tea with the inca`s while they made them exstinct.
-If supporting the nazi`s doesn`t make you one, it still makes you a fascist.
-The Spanish haven`t won anything for a hundred years.
-Im Irish, you twat.
-Ive said this too often, 200 years ago peoples views were DIFFERENT. You cant comment on the behaviors of primitive, savage and mis-understood peoples.
-Jutland was a British Victory. Hence the poem ---v
The incas weren,t exterminated.In latin america,the people are crossbred.Half spanish half incas,aztecs...There are a lot of pure indians in these countries and the quechua are spoken today.can we say that about the excolonies of australia,canada or USA?
are you irish?why in your profile that you are british?
jutland was a british victory of course.6000 british dead and 2200 german dead..
but don,t worry this naval humillations are commons in your country from the middle age.
Of course,the greatest empire thanks to the central desert in australia and the frozen wastelands of canada.
"gibraltar"-cartagena de inias 1741?
ahhaahahhahaha 3 centuries of british naval power?when started the british naval power and when finished?
I see that your boyfriend activeellis help you against me and follow me in several videos.can,t you with me alone? and why does he speak me in french?
@OfficialFearClan the spanish armada? yes,in this battle spain was defeated by a storm.Before the storm,spanish casualities were only 600 dead and 4 sunk ships.
I know the story about the armada but i am sure that you haven,t read about the defeat english armada sent by elizabeth one year later or the drake,s failures in canary islands,puerto rico,san juan and panama in your british "facha" books
@ANTIHYTLERS Oh no, you ran away! taking influence from the future i see! we would of kicked the shit out of your fleet in its formation had you carried on sailing.
So? later we had all of north America.
Spain in 1066-The king says "every man in spain is a spaniard".
Bollocks.
Moors in the south of your country full of shitheads, and portugese rebels that your "fantastic sovereignity" never defeated.
Activeellis is a friend of mine, he found this video
@ANTIHYTLERS Oh no, you ran away! taking influence from the future i see! we would of kicked the shit out of your fleet in its formation had you carried on sailing.
So? later we had all of north America.
Spain in 1066-The king says "every man in spain is a spaniard".
Bollocks.
Moors in the south of your country full of shitheads, and portugese rebels that your "fantastic sovereignity" never defeated.
Activeellis is a friend of mine, he found this video
@ANTIHYTLERS Oh no, you ran away! taking influence from the future i see! we would of kicked the shit out of your fleet in its formation had you carried on sailing.
So? later we had all of north America.
Spain in 1066-The king says "every man in spain is a spaniard".
Bollocks.
Moors in the south of your country full of shitheads, and portugese rebels that your "fantastic sovereignity" never defeated.
Activeellis is a friend of mine, he found this video
75% of actual USA were spanish and never english.And when, you conquested the frozen wastelands of canada,you have lost the 13 colonies 100 years before.
The king says "every man in spain is a spaniard".
ahahhahahahahahahahhaahha in 1066 SPAIN DID NOT EXIST AS A COUNTRY was a lot of kingdoms (castille,aragon,portugal,lion,catalan counties...)What king of what country do you refer?
@ANTIHYTLERS Oh no, you ran away! taking influence from the future i see! we would of kicked the shit out of your fleet in its formation had you carried on sailing.
So? later we had all of north America.
Spain in 1066-The king says "every man in spain is a spaniard".
Bollocks.
Moors in the south of your country full of shitheads, and portugese rebels that your "fantastic sovereignity" never defeated.
Activeellis is a friend of mine, he found this video
@OfficialFearClan if Blucher had not arrived with his army,napoleon had won.Napoleon wanted to defeat first the wellington army and after to defeat prussia.
why?because napoleon was knowing that wellington hadn,t could win alone.During much of the battle,waterloo was a french victory until the prussian arrival.
@ANTIHYTLERS Ok, ive had it with you. Here are the facts.
-It was Britain, (and Germany, to contradict your previous accusations) who finished off Napoleon at Waterloo. The school you are in needs to be burnt to the ground.
-Define Neo-nazi, then come back.
-Another one sided battle?
Try this one for size.
Oh, and after coronel? the German fleet was annihilated in a fair fight.
@OfficialFearClan waterloo? do you refer when wellington was almost defeated and appeared blucher in the last moment for to save him?hahahahahahhahaha
SOLDIERS IN WATERLOO: 70% german 15% belgian and dutch 15% british
In waterloo napoleon was weakened,he had lost his empire and hadn,t allied.
In the first napoleonic empire,britain NEVER DARED TO FIGHT NAPOLEON FACE TO FACE.
@OfficialFearClan In al andalus .it had beautiful cities (Cordoba was the most important european city in that time) Al andalusies bathed daily,the major of peo[ple are citizien and only a few people are farmers.Muslim introduced a lot of chinese and indian technological advances in europe and al andalus was the most advance and powerful country in europe.thank the shitty muslim that you refer when in christian europe (and england)was with the wondeful feudalism
This video makes me sick. Thus, i feel the need to share these
"What is the first thing the French Army teaches at basic training?
How to surrender in at least 10 languages."
"The French Government announced today that it is imposing a ban on the use of fireworks at Euro Disney.
The decision comes the day after a nightly fireworks display at the park, located just 30 miles outside of Paris, caused soldiers at a nearby French Army garrison to surrender to a group of Czech tourists."
@spad57 Armies have surrendered before. The french would of made it into the world record books. "Gave up in ww2 before the fight really began" "got pissed over by NVA in vietnam," and the "fastest tank in the world" of theirs isnt faster than explosive shells.
@OfficialFearClan france didn't gave up in WW2 some french did not all, some british prefer build a bridge for the japanese and some brits prefer to fight against them so we can't say all british surrender in the began of the war against japan some of them did not all and by the way french didn't fight against NVA, because north vietnam didn't exist in indochina in 1945 to 1954 but of course you can't know all this sort of thing. Ho chi min said ' i made war against french, i played with america
I was surprised that you did no make any mention of Isandlwana. That is a true humiliation of the British Military. A modern army with cannons and rifles defeated by an army of spear and shied wielding Zule warriors. That is far more worthy of a list of British military humiliations than half of what you've mentioned.
11nytram11 2 months ago
Battle of Chesapeake could have been much better handled by the British. The Royal Navy was still facing a superior number foe - the French having 24 the British having 19 - but it was Grave's poor command decision which led to the failure.
Defeat in the Battle of Chesapeake could be considered humiliating but the surrender of Cornwallis at Yorktown cannot.
11nytram11 2 months ago
Saratoga - to take a line from another, more famous battle - was a close run thing. The British came very close to winning it. If not for Benedict Arnold's late attack the battle would have been, at the very least, a draw. The British lost 7,200 in the first battle and 6,600 in the second while the Americans lost 9,000 in the first battle and over 12,000 in the second battle. This Battle was far from a humiliation for anyone.
11nytram11 2 months ago
Bunker Hill was not a humilation for the British military. It was a victory - a pyrrhic one in which the British lost more than they gained but it was still a victory. The British soldier bravely marched forwards against an enemy that held the high ground and were entrenched. It stands as a testament to poor British Generalship but bravery of the British soldier.
11nytram11 2 months ago
Fort Carillion was a failure and humiliation because of the British Commander Abercombie allowing the battle to be fought piecemeal with frontal assaults - that tactic never works against a fortified position. It was like Ambrose Burnside at Fredericksburg. Madness. The failure is entirely on Ambercombie's shoulders but despite the cohesion the British Army was not broken, it lost about 13% of its manpower and could still have been an effective force under a different commander.
11nytram11 2 months ago
Mononaghela was a failure due to Braddock and the British being unprepared for war on the North American Continent and, in particular, the style of warfare employed by the Indians. in open battle the British proved superior but as the Indian's resorted to ambushes in trees the British could not counter it. Add to that the inexperianced draftees which made up the bulk of Braddock's army and that was a recipe for disaster.
11nytram11 2 months ago
The British loses suffered at Saint Cast were not unusual for any amphibious operation. It was failure of planning and training but in execution it was pretty much your every day amphibious landing of the time. The French were very strong on the coast and they reacted very well to the operation. All in all it was a waste of British time, money and lives and was a major humiliation but it was nothing unsual for its kind of operation. Once more you seem to ignore the event that led to the loses.
11nytram11 2 months ago
Cartegena de Indias was indeed a humilation for the British. A lot of it was down to illness. Disease swept through the British ranks accounting for the vast majority of deaths suffered. Once again a failure of the commanders to work together contributed to the failure as well. However you do convienantly decide to ignore the fact that the Spanish lost all their ships, lost 5 forts, 395 cannons and around half their manpower as well so it was far from a one sided event.
11nytram11 2 months ago
At Lagos Tourville had 70 Ships of the Line - the most powerful ships available to any fleet - while the Anglo-Dutch fleet had a mere 13 between them. This was no battle, it was slaughter. The superiority of the French fleet in firepower was supreme and uncontestable. Yet still Tourville failed to prevent the Anglo-Dutch fleet getting past him and getting their merchants to Spain. 110 merchant men escaped the French Fleet and the majority of the Anglo-Dutch Ships of the Line escaped.
11nytram11 2 months ago
The French by 1690 had supassed the Dutch as the most powerful Naval force in the known world and at the battle of Beachy Head outnumbered the combined Anglo-Dutch fleet by 19 ships. This gave the French a clear advantage in number and firepower. Additionally the Anglo-Dutch Commanders failed to work together and the was English commander dispositioned the combined fleet was poor.
11nytram11 2 months ago
At the time of the Second Anglo-Dutch War the United Provinces that made up the Netherlands were a stronger military force than England was and the Dutch Navy was the most powerful in the world. They sailed 60 ships up the Thames and to oppose this mighty fleet the Royal Navy could muster less than 10. The victory of the Dutch in this endeavor was inevitable.
11nytram11 2 months ago
English losed in the English Armada are estimated at 11,000 killed wounded or captured. It was a humilation and once more a failure of leadership and command decisions. Drake being a pirate was both useful and useless at differing times, and the decision to uselessly and unsuccessfully besiege Corruna allowed the Spanish time to recover. The Spanish fleet was still more powerful than the English at that time despite the failed Spanish Armada. Stormy weather also contributed to the failure.
11nytram11 2 months ago
Of course, calling the Hundred Years War an "Epic Fail" for England kind of ignores the fact that Henry V had France on its knees and would have been crowned King of France had he lived a but longer and that England was self-destructing due to Henry IV being a total waste of spacewhen the French managed to drive the English out of France (except Calais). All in all the Hundred Years War had both good and bad points for the English.
11nytram11 2 months ago
Once again your argument for Castillion is based on casualties and not events. Talbot had recieved information that the French were fleeing their fixed fortifications and he hastilly organized a chase onto to find the information was false and the French were strongly invested, he attacked anyway, made no headway, then a Bretonic Cavalry force arrived attacked Talbot's flank and destroyed/routed the English. A failure of Talbot's command but not a humilation where seiges are concerned.
11nytram11 2 months ago
Your obsessed with casualties but ignore the events of the battle that led to those casualties being taken. At Formigny the English Army of 4,000 fought a French Amy of 5,000 French and 1,200 Breton's and it was the Breton's late arrival which won the Battle for the French. Unlike Patay the English fought until their position became untenable and held their own against a superior numbered foe.
11nytram11 2 months ago
Patay was a humiliation but not because of the disparity of casualties. It was a humilation because the English gave away their positions to the French, weren't properly prepared for the battle and lost command cohesion when the battle began - due to the failure of Talbot and Fastolf to work together.
11nytram11 2 months ago
You state Frech loses as La Brossiniere as "1 Knight and some others" as if the others were insignificant. The amount of foot soldiers lost by the French in that battle are unknown so we cannot compare those loses to the English ones. Furthermore the French outnumbered the English at that battle by over a thousand and had been caught unprepared by the French when the battle began. Hardly a humilation.
11nytram11 2 months ago
The claim that the English lost 400 Knights and 8,000 soldiers at La Rochelle comes from Cesaro Fenandez Duro - a Castillian Naval historian - but these claims are unsourced. Duro claims that all those men were captured but does no factor in those killed. J.W. Sherbourne and Antony Tuck state that the only recorded estimates for loses in this battle were 800 deaths and betwenn 120 and 400 prisoners. Once again you picked a battle where loses are uncertain and unproven.
11nytram11 2 months ago
The losses suffered during the Battle of Old Byland are also in debate due, once more, to conflicting evidence. And again the battle cannot count as a humilation in British Miliary history for the same reason Bannockburn cannot count. If your going to list battles fought between races that would make up part of the British Military in the future then you might as well list the Battle of Hastings as a humilating British defeat or even the Battle of Brunanburh.
11nytram11 2 months ago
Similarly the military of modern day Britian is part English, Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish. As such the British military can claim heritage from both sides of the Scottish Wars of Independence. The victory of the Bruce over the useless Edward II is in no was a humiliation for the British military.
11nytram11 2 months ago
English loses at Bannockburn are estimated to be between 4,000 and 11,000, conflicting reports make the actual number uncertain. Scottish loses at the battle are also uncertain and estimated to be between 400 and 4,000. It was a battle between Robert the Bruce, King of Scots, and Edward II King of England. It can hardly count as "Her Majesty's humilation" not least of which because the current Monarch is only distantly related to both the Plantagenet and Bruce families.
11nytram11 2 months ago
@philippesella don't forguet, also with spanish help.
belac0r92 2 months ago
Britain. The first country to be beaten by their own oversea colony!
pledoux 2 months ago
@philippesella 1066, ils n'addmetrent jamais que la conquete a eté française.et inventent plusieurs des excuses pour nier ça. Des Plantagenet ont eté des nobles Français qui ont governé l'Angletérre par 400 ans :p
pledoux 2 months ago
@philippesella Vrai! Plantagenet! Quelques nobles français en giverné l'Angleterre!
pledoux 2 months ago
And still, after all that. We English are still here getting right up your noses.
powderdust 3 months ago
sorry guys i never heard of these battles n "victories" all i know is i rate the Russians first n the British second of all the military powers on earth they r the only two that have fought many bales against the ODDS n won all others are way behind we own them our freedom for the batle of Britain n the battle of staligrad both won on bravery tenacity n sucrifies against overwhelming firepower n numbers n to me This is bravery winning with numbers n firepower on u r side proves nothing
polygamous1 4 months ago
@polygamous1
"sorry guys i never heard of these battles" Of course you never heard of this, English propaganda .
jeffkodiac 4 months ago
This has got to be the least historicaly accurate vidio in the world
allcoolmrdon 4 months ago
Not just battle of cartagena de indias was the second most humillating battle for the british (behind Singapur). During the war of jenkins ear, the spanish captured over 500 english ships...
belac0r92 5 months ago
What was it King Philip said after Drake buggered the Armada? mmm "thee eengleeesh av a fuck-ed us again! ay carammba!. Then we went on to do beat you AND the French every time you forgot your oily places. We also took all your colonies off you and the gold off your ships and now your people live in shanty towns in rotten jungles killing each other for access to the nearest piss - hole. Fitting I believe.
Godwinsson77 9 months ago
@Godwinsson77
Successul invasions of Britain since 1066 :
1066 : the French-Normans
1154 : The French Angevins (Henri Plantagenet)
1216 : The French Capetians (Louis VIII)
1326 : Isabella of France (A French Faction)
1688 : William of Orange (the Dutch, helped by French Huguenots).
Before 1066, Britain was invaded by the Romans, the Angles, the Saxons, the Danes, making Britain the BITCH of EUROPE.
HONNI SOIT QUI MAL Y PENSE, you got french DNA in your Veins...
lahire666 9 months ago
@lahire666 Le pire c 'est que même avec toutes les preuves que l'on pourras trouver les Anglais ce prendrons pour les maitre de l'Europe.
tokra4040 9 months ago
@lahire666 whilst I hate the english as much as everyone else here I would not include William III invasion and attribute it as part french. The French crown was essentially catholic and undoubtedly opposed the Dutch Protestant invasion of catholic england...not too many huguenots fro france either
Foneio 5 months ago
@Foneio
You make a mistake 1066 was well a French-Norman victory . There were many French protestant who fled in Holland and in England .
jeffkodiac 5 months ago
@jeffkodiac NO, NOT 1066, I'm talking about the dutch invasion of 1688. Sorry, I should have specified, of course the french supported normandy, I'm saying the crown didnt support the protestants
Foneio 5 months ago
@Foneio
I understand now but i'm think there was French huguenot with the Dutch army in 1688 .
jeffkodiac 5 months ago
@Godwinsson77
Spanish empire was bigger than English
cocotena 3 weeks ago
name of the music please
druisten3 9 months ago
1 word agincourt BOOM!!!
greggyinfantry 9 months ago
@greggyinfantry
1 word Castillon BADABOOM .
jeffkodiac 9 months ago
@greggyinfantry
it's ainzincour dumbass , and the english was not fair play , a great felony like at Mers el khébyr
druisten3 9 months ago
@druisten3 Je crois que ta loyauté envers Vichy est mal placé. On doit comprendre que les français a eu le choix, ils pourraient continuer la guerre contre les allemands ou rester avec leur maître qui s'appelle Adolf Hitler. C'est ridicule que types comme toi nous critique à cause de tes leaders faibles! L'attentat sur la flotte française était juste, contre l'axe du mal.
VendeeD85 6 months ago
@VendeeD85
lol
ma famille est gaulliste depuis Aout 1941 ! ,
En 1940 les effectif des FFL étaient symbolique et de toute façon la Grande Bretagne ne voulait pas que cette flotte rejoigne les FFL !
Il a fallut attendre 1941-1942 et surtout 1943 pour que les effectif des FFl devienne non-négligeable ..
je te prie donc de revoir ton esprit critique et de révisé ton histoire de la france libre ..
cordialement
un Gaulliste ...
druisten3 5 months ago
You forget the punishment expedition and sack of Cornwall by the imperial spanish troops in 1595
Thrashgu 10 months ago
I think this was al thrown together by a seven year old retard. Le grand bollox. Funny it never mentions Crecy, Agincourt, Waterloo or Trafalgar. V le fingers from le roast bouf.
HeavensGremlin 10 months ago
@HeavensGremlin
"le roast bouf " funny , for your information this video was not make by a Frenchman .And it is also not mentioned Hasting , Bouvines or Fontenoy .
jeffkodiac 10 months ago
haha lol the numbers u give here are completly bogus learn some history retard
hehno1 11 months ago
I don't give a shit, no matter how many "humiliating" defeats Britain suffered, this country still went onto control a quarter of the world's land area. And that is something no other country and even try and belittle. Cry more faggots.
ihavekankles 1 year ago
DON'T FORGET ONE THINGS FRANCE it's the PRINCIPAL POWER WITH GERMANY of EUROPEAN UNION .
esprit83990 1 year ago
@InglouriousBasterds5 FRANCE it's not coward, you re country is it,if you re british: you lost the independance war of USA and you became the SLAVE,the pretty dog of USA, all your industry it's american,your nuclear missile=american not UK,you aren't European,you re the "51 state" of USA . don't forget FRANCE kick your ass all the time you'll want. remember the french missile"EXOCET"in "falkland war". Your state want to unit UK military power with FRANCE.So shut up "ROSBEEF"
esprit83990 1 year ago
@LoderVonshtect FRANCE it's not coward, you re country is it,if you re british: you lost the independance war of USA and you became the SLAVE,the pretty dog of USA, all your industry it's american,your nuclear missile=american not UK,you aren't European,you re the "51 state" of USA . don't forget FRANCE kick your ass all the time you'll want. remember the french missile"EXOCET"in "falkland war". Your state want to unit UK military power with FRANCE.So shut up "ROSBEEF"
esprit83990 1 year ago
@InglouriousBasterds5 it's WRONG !! FRANCE didin't loose the WW1 but FRANCE lost WW2 BUT FRANCE get a fierce RESISTANCE to help the allied to get the best information to UK and USA
esprit83990 1 year ago
@InglouriousBasterds5 LOL! In WW1 French saved the alied effort in Balkans and in maind front against germans. French victories like 1st Marne, 2nd Marne, Verdun etc saved the allied.
pledoux 1 year ago
@InglouriousBasterds5
Ah OK you are the new retarded troll of this video ..
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@LoderVonshtect
And you are a retarded coward hiding behind a false identity .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
At jangi fett,you hate French people,you will never say that France has won. a victory,well I got news for you,shut the fuck up,son of whores ,son of a bitch.we french won battles,France is the oldest country in Europe .bnp fucker... Brits are nothing but worthles trash. ,and to amercians.we fukin helped you in the 7 years war,if it was not us,.the USA would not exist !!!
12345668587 1 year ago
@94KJordan
Our country is still the most visited in the world.More than 80 millions of people. Not too shabby for a "crappy" country?
Now, go kill someone in a football stadium.
chris25fr 1 year ago
history is written by the winner, that is why france's history books are so empty. so what, they won battles but the british won wars, a total of 87 to 89 wars if my mind serves me correctly. don't worry, france is a good second with something like 60 wars won, then its italy and then its russia. so, keep your battle victories and we british will keep our WAR victories.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
Yeah we keep our victory in YORKTOWN ( US independence). for example.For your knowledge,there were 3 times more French than American in YORKTOWN battlefield.
Au revoir .
chris25fr 1 year ago
@chris25fr like i said, your listing a battle. and the fact that england was facing off against 3 sides during the american revolution sort of made the conflict one sided. but what it proved is that it needed 3 countries to win a war aginst the british empire.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@chris25fr i couldnt give a crap about yorktown, more's to the point, neither did Lord Cornwallis. so where was france during the war of 1812, oh yeah, getting owned by the British in the Nepolionic war.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
During the war of 1812 the French fight in Louisiana alongside the American to put the English out again .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac really? you sure? i think the french had more pressing matters, such as the napolionic war. france couldnt do what britain di, that was fight 2 wars at the same time.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
Battle of New Orleans , Jean Lafitte and his men . Man you are funny with your arrogance in the history in the majority of battles between France and England , the French was alone against the English with allies .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac i could not emphasise more on how much shit i do not give. and not quite, spain was with u during the napolionic wars, if france had an ichy scrotum, spain would scratch it for you. and just look what happened at traffalgar. like bricks your ships sank.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
You are funny again in the French revolution wars and Napleonic wars you fought the French behind all great European monarchies . Before 1812 the French was pratically alone against all the European monarchies . In the war of the first coalition Spain was allied with the English and others countries , the English and their allied and the Spanish attacked the French on 2 front and what happened at Fleurus and San Lorenzo .....
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac refer to previous comment, i honestly dont care any more, look out you window, there is a world out there. i suggest you step away from your computer and go out for a while. the world doesn't need morons like you correcting everybody at every toss and turn, so what i was wrong, i dont give a crap. i didnt say i hated the french, i just hate french people like you.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
What a kind of retarded hypocritical you are ? Remember your first comment " history is written by the winner , that is why France 's history books is so empty " the world doesn't need pathetic troll as you who spend their time to stir up hatred . And tell me when i have said that i hate the English ?
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac the fact is its vids like this that are retarded, no country is perfect and thats a fact, mores to the point that france showed its true colours during the second world war, and i never said you hated the english, i couldnt care if you do, i'm not gonna lose sleep over it. i was just stating a point. and troll? what are you seven? the reason why i said that is because france doesn't have what the world calls a famous victory, or that the world just doesn't give a shit about france.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
Man the fact is that the English have better propaganda than the French and especially since 2003 when the American have decided to rool in shit their oldest allies France . "not famous victory " huh !! Vouillé 507, Poitiers 732 , Hasting 1066 , Jerusalem 1099, Bouvines 1214 , Formigny 1450 , Castillon 1453 , Rocroi 1643 , Valmy 1792 , Rivoli 1797 ,Marengo 1800 , Ulm 1805 , Austerlitz 1805 , Iena 1806 , Friedland 1807 , Malakoff 1855 , Magenta 1859 etc...
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac what ever, i dont care any more, i know and admit that there are aspects of my country that are absolute balls, but what makes me see that is that i dont have my head stuffed up my arse like a frenchman. and hastings was a norman victory, normans where not french, they are desendants of the dutch and saxons. the only reason why france thinks hastings was a french victory is because the invasion was launched from france.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
Wrong , in fact Hasting was a Franco-Norman victory . After several generation the Normans had become French . The Norman were mixed with the French local population more numerous , the Norman adopted the language of the French , the tradition of the French , culture and religion of the French , the Norman adopted also military tactics of the French .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac you just dont get it, not one bit. i have mentioned it before and i'm gonna mention it again. i dont care, who gives a shit. get your head out the history books will you and do something with your life instead of tearing of someones head who doesnt have the compleate picture you knobarse, i dont care about history, come to mention it, i dont care about french history, they have done nothing for this world and they never will.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
I undestand that the truth hurt you . " i don't care about history " so what you make on this video little hypocritical . " they have done nothing for the world " they only changed your useless country for long time lol .. . Me i did not care about the English the only thing that is interesting with the English is their enormous capacity in the bragging .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac well you should know where we it it from with videos like this.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
The English make the same kind of video about the French , the English even created song about French , the name of this song " why i hate the French " , pathetic !!!!
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac was it me singing this? i think not, but i'm starting to see why it was made.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
No you say that you not hate the French but this song exist well , you have a video on YT .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
And for your information this video was not made by a Frenchman .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac well d'oh me then for not seeing where the guy who made this comes from. seriously, why are we still arguing!? i dont give a crap anymore and you just seem to want to carry on.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234
If you're not interested in history do not coming on this kind of vidoe but i'm think you are interested by the history of France because i have seen many of your comment on the video where we talk about France history . But if you prefer say that you did not care about France history or France it's your problem .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jangofett1234FRANCE it's not coward, you re country is it,if you re british: you lost the independance war of USA and you became the SLAVE,the pretty dog of USA, all your industry it's american,your nuclear missile=american not UK,you aren't European,you re the "51 state" of USA . don't forget FRANCE kick your ass all the time you'll want. remember the french missile"EXOCET"in "falkland war". Your state want to unit UK military power with FRANCE because it's expensive for U.So shut up "ROSBEEF"
esprit83990 1 year ago
@esprit83990 AHAHAHAH! the trident missile programme is most certainly british, we lost the war of independance because we were against 3 countries at once, it was the british that made the industrial revolution and no american resource was used but was brought by america, and the exocet? a bb gun of a missile. name me one war which france has won in the past 30 years.... you can't? oh, thats right, its cause you didnt. so right back at you "QUASSIONT"
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234 No Wrong !! i'm sorry But the trident missile it's AMERICAN technology, because the maintenance of your missile,it's the FRENCH MILITARY going to made the maintenance, UK sign the contract of maintenance with the FRENCH Ministery of Defense, and the USA are uncomfortable because FRANCE will make the maintenance and it ll see the secret of the "trident".After on the EXOCET destroyed HSM SHEFFIELD, and an other ship and damaged the HSM YAMOUTH.
esprit83990 1 year ago
@esprit83990 2 frigates, nothing specail that whent down, and i say again, there were more british scientists working with the americans to develop an atomic weapon then there was americans. and it really isn't a maintenance pact we're signing, it's a pact that will bring continental europe closer to britain. and i doubt it would even last that long you ffffuckin arse.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234 yes of course But UK NEED the HELP of USA ,because your scientist need US scientists to make the "trident or polaris" missile you need the help of the US system , the difference with FRANCE our scientist needn't help USA to make the French nuclear missile. it's why FRANCE is the 3rd nuclear powerfull with MISSILE 100/100 made in france . it's real !
esprit83990 1 year ago
@jangofett1234 it is just because no country dare to attack us :)
spad57 1 year ago
@spad57 too true padre, too true.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jangofett1234, the Normans are not descendants from the Dutch. The Dutch didn't exist in that yet. The Normans were French by the time they invaded England, and they were also accompanied by many people from various regions of France. Angevins, Poitevins, Bretons, Flemish, etc...all fought at Hastings. Technically it is a French victory.
expertstrategy 1 year ago
@expertstrategy i can not express more on how much i dont give a fuck. look, i'm trying to get it in to the dude below us head that i dont care anymore, yeah i was wrong ohhhhhhh. but the point is if it takes shit like that to get you lot to scurry from under your rocks then i may have been wasting my time. now go scurry back under that rock, i think you may crisp if you stay out in the light for too long.
jangofett1234 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac
stop stealing american history u frog ribbit ribbit
it was andrew jackson that saved new orleans
MrPhucyu123 1 year ago
@MrPhucyu123
Little coward you know only one thing the name of your pathetic country = TROLL LAND lol
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac
troll land = frankreich
MrPhucyu123 1 year ago
@MrPhucyu123
Non troll land is a country for degenerate as you ..
Bye bye
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac
jeffkodiac and skit are 1 person whose only objective in life is to hypolize the french battles...
MrPhucyu123 1 year ago
@MrPhucyu123
Little hypocritical coward don't waste your time with me , the retarded troll who hiding behind a false identity like you don't interest me . Me i'm not a shitty coward like you i have the name of my country on my page and i am proud of that .
Bye bye
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac this guy has been saying this for quiet some time now...
MrPhucyu123 1 year ago
@MrPhucyu123
Huh !! You are here again retarded troll , you dont read my comment ?? You don't interest me , i'm think you have really a big problem in your head . You say that France never win a single war or battle so why you are always on the French video ? The smart people do not comment on what is uninteresting .
Au revoir
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac
why are you bashing the english when you learned that language?
a bientot
MrPhucyu123 1 year ago
@MrPhucyu123
You are funny it's me now who make bashing lol read correctly please .
Tu vois quand tu veux tu parle un peu Français lol .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac
non...?
i just dont like writing that language when the internet was made by english speakers
MrPhucyu123 1 year ago
@94KJordan
You put your finger on the nail there.
If it weren`t for Britain, everyone here would be speaking German.
Yeah, and notice how many French people speak english yet so few English people speak French.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan "Everyone here would be speaking German" if there are not the Channel perhaps everyone would be speaking German and you too . " few English speak French " a great part of the English language come from the old French and French .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac Well....alright :D
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@jeffkodiac yes alot of english words were borrowed from french including the french word for surrender
french: se render
english surrender
if you say those words, they sound almost alike
MrPhucyu123 1 year ago
@MrPhucyu123
" Victory " come from the French too , little troll hiding behind a false identity lol .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@94KJordan
You say really anything , this video was not make by a French . And since the HYW the French alone have regularly beaten the English with their allies in many battles , Also remains polite . And if France is what you say , explain me why France is the largest tourism country in the world .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
94KJordan you had made a mistake, maybe you want to say : "i love all the french " (le blabla qui suit ta réponse confirme juste la capacité cérébrale qui caracterise beaucoup d'anglo saxon ici et qui est proche du néant)
spad57 1 year ago
@LadyMary6996 australia are the killers of the aborigen people shame on you!!
violent histrory? you stupid and small history is mark by the crime and atrocity you had done to the real people of australia. go back to you uggly island and let the european speak about their long and nice history.
spad57 1 year ago
@LadyMary6996
The Roman were a joke , they have conquered many lands yes but they fought only tribals and villages , we saw what happened whene they fought against unified peoples such as the Mongols or even the Gauls of Vercingetorix , he made julius ceaser himself shit in his pant LOL! But what is so funny it's whene you say " The French/Spanish/British previous empires doesn't even come close to what the Romans once had" Roman empire was the smallest ans the most pathetic lol ->
NasriTheNewKing 1 year ago
@NasriTheNewKing
The only thing that the romans brought to this world was some roads lmao .
NasriTheNewKing 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LadyMary6996 "i say good things about British poms & their victorys, because i know for sure that Froggies like yourself won't be able to resist replying back!"
i say bad about british defeats because i like angry patriots i am not very patriot.
pd:what does "poms" mans?
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@LadyMary6996 I don,t understand you.You say that french,british and french are pathetic but you have written about the glorious battle of trafalgar, the wonderfull english language and call spanish people gypsies.?If you are not a really british patriot i hail you.
pd:Sorry for my english
pd2:In my opinion,chinese empire was more important and decisive in the history that roman empire
pd3:If you hate the british patriotism,i should you visit lordgeorgerodney,s channel.
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@LadyMary6996
" a trap " lol , i was right you are reallu a buffoon . If you in your pathetic life , you make the same thing i pity your family . "Violent history " yes it's true that speak about language is very violent lol . " all superior " sorry but for bragging the Australian are not bad and for xenophobia too . Good night miss marsupial ..
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@LadyMary6996
" a defeat " i don"t think so , the English language had become the vehicular language but not the official language of the countries , the French and Spanish language is alwyas speak in many country as official language . Elsewhere that is expected that the Spanish languae is the most spoken in US in 2050 .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@LadyMary6996
What uncultivated person you are . the Romans make worst thing , when they invade Gauls they make a genocide on the Gallic people . Your country come from the English conquest and you what you make , you say that the English are bitter people pfff . And of course you don't know that the English and the French have invented hundreds of thing that you use in everyday life , thats thing that have made the modern world . You are really pitiful ..
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@LadyMary6996
And explain me if this video are stupid what have you done here , you're so ridiculous ..
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@LadyMary6996
And anthyller is not French retarded whore . I think you have a big problem in your head , you come here with your stupid arrogance , it's normal that Australian they make not this kinf of video , their history is a big joke . For your information the Brits the French and the Spanish created the modern world , And explain me what created the Australian , except kangourou hunting ..This is your county who are a clown country lol .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
@LadyMary6996
"Also embarassed themselves in the past " The English like you come regularly with their bragging and you tell that the French are bitter . Explain me why the French are bitter they have one of the most greatest military history . Losing the battle of Trafalgar , as i see you have selective memory you forget the battle of Cheasepeake . You forget one thing is that in majority of battle the French fight alone against the English with allies . And nevetheless the French win many .
jeffkodiac 1 year ago
jose barreras vas a hacer una segunda parte? tengo unas cuantas derrotas en la mente
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
first british invasion to afganistan in 1842.it Sent 200.000 soldiers and only one came back.ahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahaahaahahhahhahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhahahahahahahahahhahahahaha
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS WW2-French have a massive line of forts from the south of belgium all the way to the bottom of germany`s left. What did the germans do? Invade belgium, go round, and destroy the forts from behind. "hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan only 1 maginot fort was taken, all the other never been captured.
spad57 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan I am not french stupid ahahahhahaha
hahahahahahahaha.Battle of el coronel (1914).In this battle fought the inexperienced german navy vs the most powerful navy in that time.The british royal navy.british casualities?1654 british died and 2 cruisers was destroyed..german casualities?0 deads and 0 ships destroyeds
ahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahaahhahahhahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahaahahahhahahaaahahhahahahahahah
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS Then why are you anti British, you twat.
Oh, your forgetting jutland, you moronic neo-nazi.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan Oh that is just pathetic. Theres no such thing as the "battle of el coronel", youve just made it up off the top of your head. Why are you arguing anyway? our monarch queen victoria was German, and we had an alliance against the french for 200-300 years before that anyway. In retrospect, you`re an idiot.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan Yes the battle of jutland.
british casualities? 6000 dead and 14 ships were destroyed
german casualities? 2200 dead and 11 ships were destroyed.
and IAM NOT GERMAN.look in my profile stupid.
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS -Spanish? Penisular war, kid.
-You still made up the battle of el coronel, which is just sad.
-The spanish supported the nazi`s, so im not wrong calling you a fascist/nazi.
-Our navy was bigger than that of the Germans
-The Germans ran away.
-The Germans never had a good navy again.
Good day sir.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan congratulations! you have learned my nationality!you won a car and 2 millions of pounds!
/the spanish supported the nazi,s so/ why do you think that i am nazi?I wrote about the british defeat in his invasion to afghanistan.am i a taliban?Your reasoning are ridiculous..you are british. are you a killer of indians, maoris, zulus,or irish catholics?I wrote about the battle of coronel and jutland because are 2 examples of a lot of british defeats in the sea and in the earth.
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS -Im sure the spanish constiqaudors sat down and had a nice cup of tea with the inca`s while they made them exstinct.
-If supporting the nazi`s doesn`t make you one, it still makes you a fascist.
-The Spanish haven`t won anything for a hundred years.
-Im Irish, you twat.
-Ive said this too often, 200 years ago peoples views were DIFFERENT. You cant comment on the behaviors of primitive, savage and mis-understood peoples.
-Jutland was a British Victory. Hence the poem ---v
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
The incas weren,t exterminated.In latin america,the people are crossbred.Half spanish half incas,aztecs...There are a lot of pure indians in these countries and the quechua are spoken today.can we say that about the excolonies of australia,canada or USA?
are you irish?why in your profile that you are british?
jutland was a british victory of course.6000 british dead and 2200 german dead..
but don,t worry this naval humillations are commons in your country from the middle age.
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS Few things
-Im not going to feed you, mr troll, if you cant settle this by accepting the truth.
-Please, for the love of god, improve your grammar.
-I have no idea what language we are speaking in. Cant be ENGLISH, because that would make you a hypocrit!
-Im currently in ireland.
-The Germans never had the balls to fight with us.
-We had the biggest navy for 300 years, and invented dreadnoughts.
-Oh, and biggest empire the planet has ever seen.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan the biggest empire in the world was the mongol empire.
hahahahahabritain hadn,t the biggest navy for 300 years.
gallions (spanish invention) dominated the seas for 250 years.Dreadnoughts only for 100 years.
the spanish haven,t lost anything in a hundred years
if you are in ireland,you don,t become in irish.
England never try to fight directly against napoleon.When the peninsula war started,england helped spain to attack to napoleon for behind.
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS Vous est a petit merde, Oui!?
activeellis 1 year ago
@activeellis FYI..."vous êtes un petit merde".*
KillerMayhem 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS, the British empire was bigger than the Mongol. 36.1 million km2 . Mongol Empire 33.0 million km2.
expertstrategy 1 year ago
@expertstrategy
Yes,trafalgar was a great british victory.
Of course,the greatest empire thanks to the central desert in australia and the frozen wastelands of canada.
"gibraltar"-cartagena de inias 1741?
ahhaahahhahaha 3 centuries of british naval power?when started the british naval power and when finished?
I see that your boyfriend activeellis help you against me and follow me in several videos.can,t you with me alone? and why does he speak me in french?
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ANTIHYTLERS, I'm not British, I was only pointing out a flaw in your comment.
expertstrategy 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS Oh, missed this statement. Britain DID have the most powerful navy for 200-300 or so years. Ive said it thrice now, Trafalgar.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan the spanish armada? yes,in this battle spain was defeated by a storm.Before the storm,spanish casualities were only 600 dead and 4 sunk ships.
I know the story about the armada but i am sure that you haven,t read about the defeat english armada sent by elizabeth one year later or the drake,s failures in canary islands,puerto rico,san juan and panama in your british "facha" books
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS Oh no, you ran away! taking influence from the future i see! we would of kicked the shit out of your fleet in its formation had you carried on sailing.
So? later we had all of north America.
Spain in 1066-The king says "every man in spain is a spaniard".
Bollocks.
Moors in the south of your country full of shitheads, and portugese rebels that your "fantastic sovereignity" never defeated.
Activeellis is a friend of mine, he found this video
Navy-Pax Britannica, 1815–1895
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ANTIHYTLERS Oh no, you ran away! taking influence from the future i see! we would of kicked the shit out of your fleet in its formation had you carried on sailing.
So? later we had all of north America.
Spain in 1066-The king says "every man in spain is a spaniard".
Bollocks.
Moors in the south of your country full of shitheads, and portugese rebels that your "fantastic sovereignity" never defeated.
Activeellis is a friend of mine, he found this video
Navy-Pax Britannica, 1815–1895
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS Oh no, you ran away! taking influence from the future i see! we would of kicked the shit out of your fleet in its formation had you carried on sailing.
So? later we had all of north America.
Spain in 1066-The king says "every man in spain is a spaniard".
Bollocks.
Moors in the south of your country full of shitheads, and portugese rebels that your "fantastic sovereignity" never defeated.
Activeellis is a friend of mine, he found this video
Our navy was dominant for a hundred years.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan we had all of north America
75% of actual USA were spanish and never english.And when, you conquested the frozen wastelands of canada,you have lost the 13 colonies 100 years before.
The king says "every man in spain is a spaniard".
ahahhahahahahahahahhaahha in 1066 SPAIN DID NOT EXIST AS A COUNTRY was a lot of kingdoms (castille,aragon,portugal,lion,catalan counties...)What king of what country do you refer?
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS Oh no, you ran away! taking influence from the future i see! we would of kicked the shit out of your fleet in its formation had you carried on sailing.
So? later we had all of north America.
Spain in 1066-The king says "every man in spain is a spaniard".
Bollocks.
Moors in the south of your country full of shitheads, and portugese rebels that your "fantastic sovereignity" never defeated.
Activeellis is a friend of mine, he found this video
Our navy was dominant for a hundred years.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan if Blucher had not arrived with his army,napoleon had won.Napoleon wanted to defeat first the wellington army and after to defeat prussia.
why?because napoleon was knowing that wellington hadn,t could win alone.During much of the battle,waterloo was a french victory until the prussian arrival.
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan ENGLAND NEVER DARED TO FIGHT NAPOLEON FACE TO FACE.AHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAH
you are neonazi.This affirmation is very funny.are you humorist?
battle of rochelle (1372)Spanish fleet vs english fleet.ALL english ships were sunk.
hahahhaha
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS Ok, ive had it with you. Here are the facts.
-It was Britain, (and Germany, to contradict your previous accusations) who finished off Napoleon at Waterloo. The school you are in needs to be burnt to the ground.
-Define Neo-nazi, then come back.
-Another one sided battle?
Try this one for size.
Oh, and after coronel? the German fleet was annihilated in a fair fight.
battle of the falklands islands (1914)
Get your head out of your arse.
Pro tip:What language are we speaking? ;)
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan waterloo? do you refer when wellington was almost defeated and appeared blucher in the last moment for to save him?hahahahahahhahaha
SOLDIERS IN WATERLOO: 70% german 15% belgian and dutch 15% british
In waterloo napoleon was weakened,he had lost his empire and hadn,t allied.
In the first napoleonic empire,britain NEVER DARED TO FIGHT NAPOLEON FACE TO FACE.
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS *Sigh, you are so thick.
We were kicking the shit out of the french at Waterloo, the prussians just secured that victory.
Spose you could say it was a coalition against shitheads like you.
Stop speaking English, your not worth its greatness.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan In al andalus .it had beautiful cities (Cordoba was the most important european city in that time) Al andalusies bathed daily,the major of peo[ple are citizien and only a few people are farmers.Muslim introduced a lot of chinese and indian technological advances in europe and al andalus was the most advance and powerful country in europe.thank the shitty muslim that you refer when in christian europe (and england)was with the wondeful feudalism
neonazi. Read my name
ANTIHYTLERS 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS Actually, Yes they did for your information, And not all english ships were sunk.
You are pathetic, Arguing over something pointless. How about you learn how to spell.
And Neonazi!? What the fuck!
And just so you know, After a fullstop there is a space.
Dumbshit.
activeellis 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS P.s
Gibraltar.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS You dont even know how Jutland went. Heres an in detail description.
Captain beuatty leads his fleet of 6 ships into the north sea, drawing out the German fleet.
The Germans are led towards a massive line of British ships at Jutland.
The Germans destroyed most of the 6 ships that lured them out.
Then, they ran away.
The Germans cry "weve won!"
But it seems a curious view
For it is the conquerors who run
And the "vanquished" who pursue.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS "the Germans cry We've won!"
But yet it seems a curious view
That they are conquerors who run,
They the vanquished who pursue
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@ANTIHYTLERS germans had 3 wounded :) ,that's not bad for the royal navy :o
spad57 1 year ago
This video makes me sick. Thus, i feel the need to share these
"What is the first thing the French Army teaches at basic training?
How to surrender in at least 10 languages."
"The French Government announced today that it is imposing a ban on the use of fireworks at Euro Disney.
The decision comes the day after a nightly fireworks display at the park, located just 30 miles outside of Paris, caused soldiers at a nearby French Army garrison to surrender to a group of Czech tourists."
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan how to surrender? easy, they ask to brits who had made it so often in the past from yorktown to singapore.
spad57 1 year ago
@spad57 Armies have surrendered before. The french would of made it into the world record books. "Gave up in ww2 before the fight really began" "got pissed over by NVA in vietnam," and the "fastest tank in the world" of theirs isnt faster than explosive shells.
OfficialFearClan 1 year ago
@OfficialFearClan france didn't gave up in WW2 some french did not all, some british prefer build a bridge for the japanese and some brits prefer to fight against them so we can't say all british surrender in the began of the war against japan some of them did not all and by the way french didn't fight against NVA, because north vietnam didn't exist in indochina in 1945 to 1954 but of course you can't know all this sort of thing. Ho chi min said ' i made war against french, i played with america
spad57 1 year ago
je prefere isandlwana comme humiliation : les zoulous qui balaye la ligne anglaise..
spad57 1 year ago 5