also, i find rorty's claim about the second law of thermodynamics extremely problematic. was he suggesting dewey, clifford (and why he did not mention peirce is strange) accepted that the SLofT pointed to a world where human emotions would no longer play a role in a world of pure reason? and even if that were the case, why would james be forced to hold that view. in fact, it appears james's the will to believe (a response to clifford) explains clearly why that could never be the case.
while i like rorty as a general philosopher, he was simply wrong about james. rorty never quite seem to "get" pragmatism. I blame his philosophical education that was rot with analytics and positivism. just saying.
Communism is the cancer of this presentation. The proper pragmaticist view clearly demands the existence of God because an operational definition for God is established.
That man is completely devoid of humor! One could have Chaplin juggling the Marx Brother, whilst perpetually slipping in banana peals, right in front of him and he would not crack even a hint of a smile... Here Kierkegaard's critique of Hegel (that the professor had no humor and therefore had a faulty system) applies. Perhaps the horrors of metaphysics is related to humor as well, and Rorty is merely a bore...?
Isn't that the same attitude that has American Evangelicals thinking that the Grand Canyon is a skid-mark from Noah's Ark? It is all in eyes of the beholder, mate... I'm not telling you that your love isn't true - just saying that he seems more like a an awkward social dysfunctional than Richard Pryor...
Rorty's got an ferocious sense of humor. Feel free to quibble with him philosophically, but the man was a master of comedic timing. He was constantly, as it were, 'taking the piss.' His 'laid back' speaking style is part of what makes his extremely dry wit so compelling.
I left some introductory links in the description. There are some books you could look for - 'Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature' by Rorty, and 'Rorty and His Critics' By Robert Brandom. I haven't read them yet myself. Hope that helps.
I found The Mirror of Nature to be pretty difficult, but worth reading. I would also recommend some of his later work like Philosophy and Social Hope. It also helps to understand some of James and Dewey. There's a great reader edited by Louis Menand called Pragmatism A Reader which is a pretty good introduction.
@psycropticunt I would actually suggest "Philosophy and Social Hope". It's a short book of essays and a good introduction to Rorty. It has some early and later works in it.
I'm currently reading "Philosophy as Cultural Politics" and it's pretty good as well though expensive.
also, i find rorty's claim about the second law of thermodynamics extremely problematic. was he suggesting dewey, clifford (and why he did not mention peirce is strange) accepted that the SLofT pointed to a world where human emotions would no longer play a role in a world of pure reason? and even if that were the case, why would james be forced to hold that view. in fact, it appears james's the will to believe (a response to clifford) explains clearly why that could never be the case.
inverhillsphilo 10 months ago
while i like rorty as a general philosopher, he was simply wrong about james. rorty never quite seem to "get" pragmatism. I blame his philosophical education that was rot with analytics and positivism. just saying.
inverhillsphilo 10 months ago
Communism is the cancer of this presentation. The proper pragmaticist view clearly demands the existence of God because an operational definition for God is established.
Drregaleagle 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Rorty is a joke. The English Speaking world has yet to produce a philosopher.
martinheideggershut 2 years ago
Manely Thompson.
Questfortruth86 2 years ago
Why does it say "Invalid Arguments" above the video?
MarxBakuninMe 2 years ago
I'm not getting that. Perhaps it is a problem with your browser. I don't know.
riversonthemoon 2 years ago
@riversonthemoon I think our Marxist friend is making a joke about the liberal Rorty...
CamerataNovaPodcasts 11 months ago
@MarxBakuninMe Oh dear, we have an orthodox Marxist who is not happy with American philosophy!
simulachra 1 year ago
FAT RED MERYN KING
LinvoyPrimus123 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ben abrams, a rather plump jew
oheneys 3 years ago
hello ben peirson, im watching you
LinvoyPrimus123 3 years ago
That man is completely devoid of humor! One could have Chaplin juggling the Marx Brother, whilst perpetually slipping in banana peals, right in front of him and he would not crack even a hint of a smile... Here Kierkegaard's critique of Hegel (that the professor had no humor and therefore had a faulty system) applies. Perhaps the horrors of metaphysics is related to humor as well, and Rorty is merely a bore...?
TheatetustheGreat 3 years ago
Devoid of a sense of humor? His humor is dry, but this whole speech is a non-stop laff reel.
testostyrannical 3 years ago 13
keep writing you are hilarious! you got any videos on tube?
mellowtribe 2 years ago
Isn't that the same attitude that has American Evangelicals thinking that the Grand Canyon is a skid-mark from Noah's Ark? It is all in eyes of the beholder, mate... I'm not telling you that your love isn't true - just saying that he seems more like a an awkward social dysfunctional than Richard Pryor...
TheatetustheGreat 2 years ago
you need to spend time with your father. perhaps going to a ball game?
mellowtribe 2 years ago
@TheatetustheGreat
Rorty's got an ferocious sense of humor. Feel free to quibble with him philosophically, but the man was a master of comedic timing. He was constantly, as it were, 'taking the piss.' His 'laid back' speaking style is part of what makes his extremely dry wit so compelling.
RIP, Richard Rorty.
idealtypical 1 year ago
Rorty is a beast that eat metavocabularies for breakfast.
brokennarcissist 3 years ago 8
Comment removed
Philosophaster 2 years ago
i'm eating a chicken sandwhich and watchig this. later, after coffee, i will go for a walk on the beach. Ahhhhhhhh
protEAsE2 3 years ago 3
is william james worth critiquing?
armstrongw5 3 years ago
lol
vegetaowen 3 years ago
This video goes great together with the "Rorty on his childhood"-video.
rootberg 3 years ago
Rorty is great.
bahramf 3 years ago
nice, where can i get an introduction to Rorty's stuff?
psycropticunt 3 years ago
I left some introductory links in the description. There are some books you could look for - 'Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature' by Rorty, and 'Rorty and His Critics' By Robert Brandom. I haven't read them yet myself. Hope that helps.
:-)
riversonthemoon 3 years ago
I found The Mirror of Nature to be pretty difficult, but worth reading. I would also recommend some of his later work like Philosophy and Social Hope. It also helps to understand some of James and Dewey. There's a great reader edited by Louis Menand called Pragmatism A Reader which is a pretty good introduction.
abandonship42 3 years ago 3
Thanks for mentioning those. I'll check them out.
:-)
riversonthemoon 3 years ago
@psycropticunt I would actually suggest "Philosophy and Social Hope". It's a short book of essays and a good introduction to Rorty. It has some early and later works in it.
I'm currently reading "Philosophy as Cultural Politics" and it's pretty good as well though expensive.
bahramf 1 year ago