bla, bla, bla and more bla. Rafael Nadal has won more than Federer in his yrs of career (yrs compared) and has done it quicker; his first Grand Slam at 19 while Roger at 22, etc, etc. There is no denial that Rafael has done better and he is a lot more exiting than Federer and his tennis has been innovative in that other players follow the "power-tennis" he has introduced!!
@YoSoyZuri Nadal didn't introduce power tennis, IVAN LENDL introduced power tennis and that was like in the late 80's, Nadal just introduced his SUPER TOPSPIN forehand, there has really been no innovation from nadal whatsoever, im not hating on nadal, i reckon his awesome, im just sayinggg
@vengadorsky ... well Roger is 4 yrs ahead, so there is always going to be 4 more yrs for Rafa than Roger to compare their records. So far Rafa has beat him in Masters and head-2-head... etc.. so next is GS!
@YoSoyZuri you dont take in mind the variable in the equation.. Djokovic.. is Nadals kryptonite.. as long as Djoker stays as strong as he is now, there wont be a next GS for nadal... unless federer beats Djoker before he plays nadal.. then maybe.. just maybe.. he would get a shot at his next GS
@vengadorsky hahahaha!! yes that will be the saddest day for international tennis because Nadal represents something Djokovic could never ...... but you keep dreaming!
nadal has controlled one slam and one slam only. the french open. the grasp roger had in other slams nadal does not have. nadal has won 6 french open. 2 wimbledons, 1 aussie and 1 us open. he is a modern day bjorn borg. he is one of the best ever but i wouldnt say he is the best ever. based on todays levels of their game people underestimate roddick at his prime as well as hewitt and nalbandian and davydenko. people think murray djoko is the best
but hewitt and roddick were amazing at their prime and federer just makes them look easy even though they are not. and fed. even continued his dominance into the murray-nadal-djoko era winning a further 4 grand slams after that 2008 wimbledon final
2009 wimby final is a showcase of how dangerous roddick and federer are. if roddick had faced anyone but federer in that final he woulda won.
I was delighted to see federer win, but I wish roddick had finally won a grandslam final against roger, the guy deserved that so much but instead got heart broken. Yet, great for federer!
But in my opinion Both this Great Players need each other They Make History Together their Matches will alweys be remembered for generation, and one more thing everyone whas alweys against nadal that he would never become Number one and that he would never beat federe mutch times and all that things cmaed true... so Nadal is a suprising player we will never know what will happend next.
why do you seek on for only seven years , tennis is a life and you must seek every year of career . for example lleyton hewitt was perfect when he was young , but we dont hear him anywhere now . federer is 28 but he is still biggest favourite on grandslams.
not in all surfaces wat about US open i dont think so nadal has won and last year fedex was having mononucleosis and he was not fully fit on that time only nadal won against him so i dont think so that he is better than fedex and nadal got injury after french open not during french open.this year fedex defeated nadal in straight sets at madrid open and he also won against murray,djokovic in straight sets.
To get your information right. Nadal whas Injured In Rome, madrid and Roland garros, at rome he decided to keep on playing as he whas number one so he didint whant to stop playing wich made he´s injury badly. But as he´s and Honorable player he doesent say i los becous of my injury he didint whant to bring up the injury on the interwievs but now in a spanish interwiev he talked all out why he´s injury got so bad and explained every thing.
this is just ridiculous ok when federer got injured and lost to nadal in wimbledon you guys didint accept the fact that cos of his injury only he lost to nadal now when same thing happened to nadal you guys are saying that nadal lost cos of injury only nothing else...and he is not a honourable player cos if he is a honourable player means he shouldnt have mentioned the injury even in the end and before roland garros he said he is fully fit
when did federer get injured in wimbeldon..... . he didint get injured there... else he wouldnt play as good as he did in that match.... so thats something made up by you.
... all the top 10 players are as good as the numberone and 2 they all can win over them if they play at their 100%, Now statestic says all m8 nadal have won mostly of the matches federer and and nadal has played thats says all....Both are amazing players but if you take it by the statestic wich everyone does aswell Nadal is better than federer and younger aswll.
6 grand slam in 7 yrs...? he won 6 grand slams in 2 yrs.. wth! and in 7 years he won a total of 15 grandslams...
2003-2009
and u know why nadal is not the best.. he couldnt even stay healthy for a year.. he body breaksdown easily bcuz of his playing style.. 23 straight semifinals.. and 18 of the 19 grandslam finals appearance.. now thats the best..
@dice017 ... we are not talking about health but about tennis!! If you think that Nadal will go away because of bad health at 23 then it is up to you to dream about it!!! You are all scare that he is Federer's big nightmare!! :)) lol
does any1 knw the name of the soundtrack playing towards the end?
Sezar927 4 weeks ago
Whats the music at 1:03 been looking for it for a long time ! Pls let me know if you know!1
sachinrolex 3 months ago
that so calles "power tennis" of nadal is just not as good as the grace and perfektion of rogers game.
nadals games are just more spectekular because of his missing precision.
where do we get if just the guy´s with the best fitness win the grandslams??
to tha kind of player nadal is... totally overtrained.. he tried to hard...
federer is a ledgend and just magic.
he shows the big and strong guy´s how to play and his genius on court is just a pleasure to watch! THAT IS TENNIS
tvtotalforever 2 years ago
bla, bla, bla and more bla. Rafael Nadal has won more than Federer in his yrs of career (yrs compared) and has done it quicker; his first Grand Slam at 19 while Roger at 22, etc, etc. There is no denial that Rafael has done better and he is a lot more exiting than Federer and his tennis has been innovative in that other players follow the "power-tennis" he has introduced!!
YoSoyZuri 2 years ago
@YoSoyZuri Nadal didn't introduce power tennis, IVAN LENDL introduced power tennis and that was like in the late 80's, Nadal just introduced his SUPER TOPSPIN forehand, there has really been no innovation from nadal whatsoever, im not hating on nadal, i reckon his awesome, im just sayinggg
KayoRepresent 1 year ago
@YoSoyZuri What the fucking fuck?? when Nadal gets his 16th grand slam.. you can start talking shit...
vengadorsky 5 months ago
@vengadorsky ... well Roger is 4 yrs ahead, so there is always going to be 4 more yrs for Rafa than Roger to compare their records. So far Rafa has beat him in Masters and head-2-head... etc.. so next is GS!
YoSoyZuri 5 months ago
@YoSoyZuri you dont take in mind the variable in the equation.. Djokovic.. is Nadals kryptonite.. as long as Djoker stays as strong as he is now, there wont be a next GS for nadal... unless federer beats Djoker before he plays nadal.. then maybe.. just maybe.. he would get a shot at his next GS
vengadorsky 5 months ago
@vengadorsky hahahaha!! yes that will be the saddest day for international tennis because Nadal represents something Djokovic could never ...... but you keep dreaming!
YoSoyZuri 5 months ago
@YoSoyZuri boy weren't you wrong! 6-0,that says it all!
urranuss 2 months ago
@YoSoyZuri
lol
nadal has controlled one slam and one slam only. the french open. the grasp roger had in other slams nadal does not have. nadal has won 6 french open. 2 wimbledons, 1 aussie and 1 us open. he is a modern day bjorn borg. he is one of the best ever but i wouldnt say he is the best ever. based on todays levels of their game people underestimate roddick at his prime as well as hewitt and nalbandian and davydenko. people think murray djoko is the best
kumar01234 2 months ago
@YoSoyZuri
djoko and murray are great.
but hewitt and roddick were amazing at their prime and federer just makes them look easy even though they are not. and fed. even continued his dominance into the murray-nadal-djoko era winning a further 4 grand slams after that 2008 wimbledon final
2009 wimby final is a showcase of how dangerous roddick and federer are. if roddick had faced anyone but federer in that final he woulda won.
kumar01234 2 months ago
Poor roddick.. i'd love fed to get cygs but my ideal 2010 is for fed to take ao, fo, and wimbledon and then roddick to get the us open :)
bannanas4eva 2 years ago
I was delighted to see federer win, but I wish roddick had finally won a grandslam final against roger, the guy deserved that so much but instead got heart broken. Yet, great for federer!
tiesthijsthejs 2 years ago
But in my opinion Both this Great Players need each other They Make History Together their Matches will alweys be remembered for generation, and one more thing everyone whas alweys against nadal that he would never become Number one and that he would never beat federe mutch times and all that things cmaed true... so Nadal is a suprising player we will never know what will happend next.
DonChilenito 2 years ago
why do you seek on for only seven years , tennis is a life and you must seek every year of career . for example lleyton hewitt was perfect when he was young , but we dont hear him anywhere now . federer is 28 but he is still biggest favourite on grandslams.
abcd7dcba 2 years ago
Roger was lucky that Rafael wasn't there - since he got injured leaving the door open for Roger at Garros and Wimbledon. LOL
YoSoyZuri 2 years ago
In 7 yrs of competing Nadal has won: 6 Grand Slams -in all surfaces, & 15 Masters. A total of 36 titles (31 of them above ATP 250).
In 7 yrs Roger won: 6 Grand Slams -none on clay, & 8 Masters. A total of 33 titles. :) That is only one reason why Nadal is the best player!
YoSoyZuri 2 years ago
not in all surfaces wat about US open i dont think so nadal has won and last year fedex was having mononucleosis and he was not fully fit on that time only nadal won against him so i dont think so that he is better than fedex and nadal got injury after french open not during french open.this year fedex defeated nadal in straight sets at madrid open and he also won against murray,djokovic in straight sets.
sristti 2 years ago
To get your information right. Nadal whas Injured In Rome, madrid and Roland garros, at rome he decided to keep on playing as he whas number one so he didint whant to stop playing wich made he´s injury badly. But as he´s and Honorable player he doesent say i los becous of my injury he didint whant to bring up the injury on the interwievs but now in a spanish interwiev he talked all out why he´s injury got so bad and explained every thing.
DonChilenito 2 years ago
this is just ridiculous ok when federer got injured and lost to nadal in wimbledon you guys didint accept the fact that cos of his injury only he lost to nadal now when same thing happened to nadal you guys are saying that nadal lost cos of injury only nothing else...and he is not a honourable player cos if he is a honourable player means he shouldnt have mentioned the injury even in the end and before roland garros he said he is fully fit
sristti 2 years ago
when did federer get injured in wimbeldon..... . he didint get injured there... else he wouldnt play as good as he did in that match.... so thats something made up by you.
DonChilenito 2 years ago
and he didint mention he´s injury during the turnoments., he told it when every one already knew he got injured and couldnt play wimbeldon....
DonChilenito 2 years ago
... all the top 10 players are as good as the numberone and 2 they all can win over them if they play at their 100%, Now statestic says all m8 nadal have won mostly of the matches federer and and nadal has played thats says all....Both are amazing players but if you take it by the statestic wich everyone does aswell Nadal is better than federer and younger aswll.
DonChilenito 2 years ago
But can he surpass 15 grand slam AND COUNTING... with that type of playing style I DONT THINK SO..
dice017 2 years ago
@dice017
Nice post...
Oxygene13 2 years ago
6 grand slam in 7 yrs...? he won 6 grand slams in 2 yrs.. wth! and in 7 years he won a total of 15 grandslams...
2003-2009
and u know why nadal is not the best.. he couldnt even stay healthy for a year.. he body breaksdown easily bcuz of his playing style.. 23 straight semifinals.. and 18 of the 19 grandslam finals appearance.. now thats the best..
dice017 2 years ago
@dice017 ... we are not talking about health but about tennis!! If you think that Nadal will go away because of bad health at 23 then it is up to you to dream about it!!! You are all scare that he is Federer's big nightmare!! :)) lol
YoSoyZuri 2 years ago
@dice017 That is by farrrrrrrr the best ;)
KayoRepresent 1 year ago