i guess its a good truck....when its empty, but isnt the point of a truck to carry things? it obviously isnt filled with to much weight cuz the suspension would show it
This test while it was testing the Facility still shows us how the T3 would do in the real world carrying a load. The other crash tests after only shows that the T3 does better against smaller vehicles as they tend to go under the larger vehicles. Carrying half of the T3's Payload Hit a large tree, bridge pillar, or a bigger vehicle and you are dead, thankfully it will be quick. I am sure this vehicle would fail the modern Euro Ncap Offset of 64Kmph at 40 of the width. T3 = Absolute Garbage!
The T3 has a payload capacity of 990 kg / 2183 lbs. the truck was tested with roughly half that. In other words if you are a working man and you crash into a tree (On highway going into Village of Tettau in province of Brandenburg the trees are literally on the side of the highway) they are going to have to scrape you from inside this thing after of course they cut it off you. Are the Deutchlanders suicidal or is the pot from Holland that good?
The 1 ton is obvlously on the load floor on the back (under the cover) and squezzes the cabin from the rear end. No chance for any truck, no matter where made in the world.
chodzi tu o to ze to nie byl oficjalny test T3 tylko test Ośrodka testującego demonstrujacy jego mozliwosci w 1999 roku. To byla stara pordzewiala T3ójka, jadąca ponad 80 kmh z 1toną ladunku na pace.
0:27 if that true then wheres the ton weight? surely we'd be able to see it as in this shot we can see the floor of the van and as for teh comparison with the volvo that would have happened if you had a bedford rascle with enough weight in it, its simple math the heavyer object will go thru the lighter object. funny how all teh other 'crash tests' of the t3 are vw corporate videos
@theprodicalsonishere all u would need is to lay some concrete in the back. Besides how would you know what a 1 tonne weight looks like. Its not as if it could be a cartoon where you see a huge piece of lead or iron with a 1 tonne written on it : )
@mamutm6pl a ton of concrete would displace a not inconsiderable area, at least two cubic metres id imagine conisdering a 850kg bag of sand occupies roughly 1.5m squared, a similar result could be gained through reinforcing the rear cell. the 0:42 crash test is no where near 50k/ph thats supposed to be the genuine T3 test. theres not enough panel deformation thoughout the structure of the entire van. considering a 3* 90's n-cap car would have A pillar deformation with a crumple zone deformed
@theprodicalsonishere when the t3 was being mase, euroncap didnt exist. The german adac did random tests of cars that interested them. There was no set guidelines bach then for tests. Maybe that wasnt 50kmh but it was the official test. That test with the cab completely diappearing was done in 1999! I think that thats a bit late for an official crash test of a car that was made in 1979-1992
@Beetlebank you never been to a building site? go down to jewsons or even B&Q sometimes has a few bags out front. this is dry too, once set id imagine it expands, considering a 5kg bag of concrete mix is enough to put up a 6x6 wall (bonding the bricks not as a concrete wall)
@theprodicalsonishere I know what 17 tons of concrete looks like as I laid it for my workshop floor. It has a density of approximately 2400kg per cubic meter meaning 1 ton occupies about 0.42 cubic metres - that would fit in the back of an estate car. By your figures concrete would float in water. As for '...expanding once set...'! Try Wikipedia before you post ;-) Or is this a total wind-up and I've been had?
@Beetlebank or you were overcharged? do you not know what a 'jumbo bag' is or how big and heavy it is. concrete is the product of cement, sand, gravel and water, at a ratio of 1 part cement to 2 parts sand to 3 parts gravel, so half a 'jumbo' bag of cement mixed with a jumbo bag of sand and one and a half jumbo bags of gravel and you should have 2.55 tons (before water) which will occupy far greater a space than 1.5 cubic metres. the water evapourates so overall size wont increase, just stay
@theprodicalsonishere Just look up the density of concrete on line - don't take my word for it. And for the record, most of the water is used in the chemical reaction with the cement. Ca3SiO5 + H2O → (CaO)·(SiO2)·(H2O)(gel) + Ca(OH)2. Surely you have noticed how much more space dry materials take up compared to when they are mixed. The water evaporates?! Now I know you're winding me up.
@Beetlebank you can quote the internet all day long great but you'v clearly never seen what a bag of cement weighing close to a ton looks like in terms of mass. ITS BIG! and laying concrete as a ballast isnt like laying a concrete floor in a workshop. do what else happens to the water as it drys out? is it returned back to god? or is it magic!
@theprodicalsonishere I know what 17 tons of concrete looks like on my workshop floor;-) I've also seen enough 1 ton dumpy bags of Lime mortar, ballast and cement to last my lifetime.
'...and laying concrete as a ballast isnt like laying a concrete floor in a workshop.' eh???!!! For your information, concrete doesn't 'dry out'; the water chemically reacts with the cement and becomes part of the final solid mass.
@theprodicalsonishere Yes, some watert lays on the surface and subsequently evaporates, however the vast bulk of the water is involved in the hydration of the cement. Not only do I quote the internet, I understand what I quote;-)
@Beetlebank jeesus pedantic or what usually when water no longer has the appearance of water most people are happy to say 'its evapourated' we also see the floor of the van at a few differant points in the video! with not a lump of concrete in sight
yo si estoy deacuerdo con el asunto de la carga por que yo he cargado mi t3 con 1255 kg de concreto y la altura de la suspencion es la misma que en este video pero yo si he notado una diferencia con otros videos de t3 , es que la t3 fue fabricada con la totalidad estructural del techo si pueden accesar a otro video de t3 notaran que el vehiculo depende de la estructura que lleva interna el techo la cual evita que el chasis de doble hacia abajo
Ugh... thank god, you told about the test conditions later... in the beginning of the vid, i was absolutely shocked about the heavy destruction of the drivers cabin... If this would had been a "real test", with such results, it would making you thinking a lot, about the Millions of these VW T3 on the road...
I might also point out that this is clearly an old vehicle. Crash tests are performed with new model cars probably nearly all the time, which is yet more evidence that this is not one of the normal crash tests.
finally someone who posted the TRUTH about this test!
Thank you guy. Now i go on drive arround in my beloved T3, cruising arround, waiting for prey and leave nothing behind than mutilated corsas and scooter kids! :D
lol.. everyone knows except the ones that commented shit below, that it was loaded with 1 tonns of weight in the back, and was running around 70-100 km/h---
@alexauto: thanks you finaly made it clear. It must have had serious reason that poor T3 crashed so badly. many other comments just blame without any knowledge...
It is a old, rusty VW T3. Speed was 80 km/h with 1 ton of weight in the back. Test was made at the ADAC, at the opening of the new testing facility in 1999 in Landsberg, Germany. They wanted to demonstrate the capability of the facility. I know that, because I worked there.
@alexauto321 Yeah! And there was VW Golf 2 and Bug. In Golf crash video you exactly can see, that threshold (bottom) of car was rusty or cut, i have seen 2nd Golfs and Jettas, which have crased at ~50-65 km/h, and deformation was normal, noone died.
@KGWOLF77 And the the bug was designed at the 30`s,,, Almost all other crash test cars are -90`s or new generation. I think,that bug survied very vell.
@jcbiddulph ... "THIS ISNT A VW, ITS A CHINESE VAN!"
Good lord. Even surrounded by information, you vomit b.s. No wonder America is in such deep trouble, American citizens are unable to process simple facts.
Hell! The T3 was loaded with a TON of weight and runned with 120 km'/h into the wall! What do you think would happen to any other Car in this situation? They would -pulverize!-
В данный Т3 положили груз. 2 тонны в кузове. Перед испытанием инженерам пришлось усиливать подвеску, так как заводская не выдержала. Читайте что написанно во время ролика!!!
Well you can load your T3 up with some heavy stuff but I don't think that little van could carry enough weight to create such carnage at normal speeds. When you have a head on impact with a concrete wall at 60mph you'll be fucked up anyway.
At last someone puts it into context, but you have to worry about all those people who believe all they see and don't think about it, scary. Person who posted those "Chinese truck" vids must be laughing his head off.
Thats great, but the whole point of buying a van is so that you can load it up, with either people or miscellaneous materials for what ever reason.....in saying that the first test counts for 9 out of 10 people which will be driving their *loaded* van.
thanks for clearing that up. It obviously was carrying a lot of weight. But still, some people would load it like that, and they risk a crash (sadly).
Good job! I was to uncertain with this video, because my father had a T3 and was involved in an accident with a golf 2 golf course and the run about 80-90 km / h and was made pieces and T3 only slightly deformed and the radiator was broken. (sorry for me ugly english)
hate to break it up for you guys, but the car was loaded with tons of shit in the back so that WV could check how the car will crash when it's really heavy.
No magic, al-qaeda or shitty engineering. Just a different type of test.
Volvo 745: Head Injury-3,868, Head Impact 200G, Chest Impact 65G; VW T3 Head Injury 155, Head Impact 42G, Chest Impact 30G.
So much for Volvo safety. Also, Youtube search Volkswagen T3 Crash Test Video 3 of 3
I have a 2003 T4 VW Eurovan and wish the USA would allow Americans to buy the T5 and the upcoming T5.5 Oh well, guess I'll have to smuggle one in from Mexico and swap VIN numbers. JK
I beg to differ, I flipped over a 1998 Chevy venture with a 1987 Hyundai Pony 1.6.
I was going 90 (KM/h) and he was going 50, I caught him on the driver's corner with the driver's side of mine, and he climbed my car and skidded for 10-15 feet. No one was injured in my car.
In fact, I have the engine in another Pony.
The car honestly didn't look too bad (write off) but heh... why bother having crumple zones when you can use the other cars'? ;)
Thank you so much for putting this video up to help sort out the confusion. You should add that the "VW crash test" was done at over 80 mph with a load of roughly 2 tons in the back.
Those real tests does not have loads. It is a pick-up truck and people DO carry heavy loads. Without loads, the occupants may survive, but with loads, zero survivors. Great video though!
It was over 2tons of load added. They ended up reinforcing the rear suspension because the weight was more than what the VW was rated for. They had to make those modifications for the purpose of safety. If the rear suspension gave out, the truck may have swung in either direction. No stock VW of that style would be able to carry that much weight. At least not safely. I personally owned a 71 bus, They are surprisingly solid in a crash. I crashed at 40 mph into a Saturn and drove away fine.
Well, there is no crumple zone, but this is an old van. Even if there was a crumple zone, it would help much as old designs were too stiff to deform properly. And I think that that T3 crash test speed was at much faster speeds than current standards.
Yeah. I bet a modern VW transporter or ford transit would do the exact same thing with all that weight in the back, and all the speed. The 80's VW bus was famous at the time for kicking volvo's ass, safety wise.
I hope JB was in it
liftoffspaceshuttle 1 month ago
i like the second t3 thats strong!
MrHeyfuckoff 2 months ago
Five star crash test rating
lASusl 2 months ago
OK!OK!荷物は無事だ( *´艸`)
manabu171 2 months ago
Shoot, it's so strong it just goes right through the barrier:)
my2006SS 3 months ago
i guess its a good truck....when its empty, but isnt the point of a truck to carry things? it obviously isnt filled with to much weight cuz the suspension would show it
korkykory 3 months ago
i see those kind of trucks in 3rd world countries thats y its a p.o.s
bobthebuilder6938 3 months ago
eu não quero andar nesse carro!
qual é idéia fazer caixões mais fino?
TheJeanfelype 3 months ago
MADE IN CHINA.
HARDBODYRALF 4 months ago
its not a vv t3 its the chinese copy of this ! really
DeathTernya 4 months ago
there was 1ton of sand in bags on the back during the test...
MultiSecretViewer 5 months ago
at least goods safe nevermind
A3IOWN3DU 5 months ago
That's messed up!
adzii1 5 months ago
Un disastro!!!!
Onemoremission 5 months ago
no trucks were harmed during the making of this video.
flipper2562 5 months ago
i like when people make videos like these, i love having things in context
arlobrubaker 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
whats the name of the song?
1997styla 6 months ago
whats the name of the song?
1997styla 6 months ago
@1997styla 'Lost and Found' by me.
wowt 6 months ago
at least the cargo is okay
Carmaddude 6 months ago
that was a asiatic copy of a german Vw t3
husqvarnastyler 6 months ago
Made in Germany (LOL)
tibberiogracco 6 months ago
@StobbsN thats kinda racist but funny, im mexican though
gueverraemz 7 months ago
boy, I'm glad that passanger area was there to protect that cargo space!
thdremily 7 months ago
This test while it was testing the Facility still shows us how the T3 would do in the real world carrying a load. The other crash tests after only shows that the T3 does better against smaller vehicles as they tend to go under the larger vehicles. Carrying half of the T3's Payload Hit a large tree, bridge pillar, or a bigger vehicle and you are dead, thankfully it will be quick. I am sure this vehicle would fail the modern Euro Ncap Offset of 64Kmph at 40 of the width. T3 = Absolute Garbage!
janetmerner 8 months ago
The T3 has a payload capacity of 990 kg / 2183 lbs. the truck was tested with roughly half that. In other words if you are a working man and you crash into a tree (On highway going into Village of Tettau in province of Brandenburg the trees are literally on the side of the highway) they are going to have to scrape you from inside this thing after of course they cut it off you. Are the Deutchlanders suicidal or is the pot from Holland that good?
janetmerner 8 months ago
i think i will buy this car for my boss...
HoLDoN4Sec 8 months ago 11
at least the load is in safe
ChiLLaTzE35 9 months ago
same if it is strong, the deceleration would kill you
TheBlackeyedpeas1996 9 months ago
it is a really safe car last year i crashed into a mercedes spritner and one of the lamps was broken and the mercedes was totally crashed
cocartmann1 11 months ago
Thats T2 test not T3 !
gzubens 11 months ago
@gzubens That's T3.
T1 - "hippie van"
T2 - Still quite round, but with big front windshield, manufactured to date in Brasil
T3 - That what you see here
mibars 10 months ago
Looks safe A+
acenace24 11 months ago
If there was no weight on the back, the crash test speed must've been 300km/h!
tiagob0592 1 year ago
This is a REAL T3 crash test.. !!!
/watch?v=qO_AfCFQR2M&feature=related
CisBanger 1 year ago
The 1 ton is obvlously on the load floor on the back (under the cover) and squezzes the cabin from the rear end. No chance for any truck, no matter where made in the world.
tourri 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OMG! a wheeled coffin!
jomimag 1 year ago
o co tu kurwa chodzi?
popek140777 1 year ago
@popek140777
chodzi tu o to ze to nie byl oficjalny test T3 tylko test Ośrodka testującego demonstrujacy jego mozliwosci w 1999 roku. To byla stara pordzewiala T3ójka, jadąca ponad 80 kmh z 1toną ladunku na pace.
mamutm6pl 1 year ago
0:27 if that true then wheres the ton weight? surely we'd be able to see it as in this shot we can see the floor of the van and as for teh comparison with the volvo that would have happened if you had a bedford rascle with enough weight in it, its simple math the heavyer object will go thru the lighter object. funny how all teh other 'crash tests' of the t3 are vw corporate videos
theprodicalsonishere 1 year ago
0:27 if that true then wheres the ton weight? surely we'd be able to see it as in this shot we can see the floor of the van
theprodicalsonishere 1 year ago
@theprodicalsonishere all u would need is to lay some concrete in the back. Besides how would you know what a 1 tonne weight looks like. Its not as if it could be a cartoon where you see a huge piece of lead or iron with a 1 tonne written on it : )
mamutm6pl 1 year ago
@mamutm6pl a ton of concrete would displace a not inconsiderable area, at least two cubic metres id imagine conisdering a 850kg bag of sand occupies roughly 1.5m squared, a similar result could be gained through reinforcing the rear cell. the 0:42 crash test is no where near 50k/ph thats supposed to be the genuine T3 test. theres not enough panel deformation thoughout the structure of the entire van. considering a 3* 90's n-cap car would have A pillar deformation with a crumple zone deformed
theprodicalsonishere 1 year ago
@theprodicalsonishere when the t3 was being mase, euroncap didnt exist. The german adac did random tests of cars that interested them. There was no set guidelines bach then for tests. Maybe that wasnt 50kmh but it was the official test. That test with the cab completely diappearing was done in 1999! I think that thats a bit late for an official crash test of a car that was made in 1979-1992
mamutm6pl 1 year ago
@theprodicalsonishere mmm. .. so a cubic meter of concrete weighs 500kg. That's only half the density of water!
Beetlebank 1 year ago
@Beetlebank you never been to a building site? go down to jewsons or even B&Q sometimes has a few bags out front. this is dry too, once set id imagine it expands, considering a 5kg bag of concrete mix is enough to put up a 6x6 wall (bonding the bricks not as a concrete wall)
theprodicalsonishere 1 year ago
@theprodicalsonishere I know what 17 tons of concrete looks like as I laid it for my workshop floor. It has a density of approximately 2400kg per cubic meter meaning 1 ton occupies about 0.42 cubic metres - that would fit in the back of an estate car. By your figures concrete would float in water. As for '...expanding once set...'! Try Wikipedia before you post ;-) Or is this a total wind-up and I've been had?
Beetlebank 1 year ago
@Beetlebank or you were overcharged? do you not know what a 'jumbo bag' is or how big and heavy it is. concrete is the product of cement, sand, gravel and water, at a ratio of 1 part cement to 2 parts sand to 3 parts gravel, so half a 'jumbo' bag of cement mixed with a jumbo bag of sand and one and a half jumbo bags of gravel and you should have 2.55 tons (before water) which will occupy far greater a space than 1.5 cubic metres. the water evapourates so overall size wont increase, just stay
theprodicalsonishere 1 year ago
@theprodicalsonishere Just look up the density of concrete on line - don't take my word for it. And for the record, most of the water is used in the chemical reaction with the cement. Ca3SiO5 + H2O → (CaO)·(SiO2)·(H2O)(gel) + Ca(OH)2. Surely you have noticed how much more space dry materials take up compared to when they are mixed. The water evaporates?! Now I know you're winding me up.
Beetlebank 1 year ago
@Beetlebank you can quote the internet all day long great but you'v clearly never seen what a bag of cement weighing close to a ton looks like in terms of mass. ITS BIG! and laying concrete as a ballast isnt like laying a concrete floor in a workshop. do what else happens to the water as it drys out? is it returned back to god? or is it magic!
theprodicalsonishere 1 year ago
@theprodicalsonishere I know what 17 tons of concrete looks like on my workshop floor;-) I've also seen enough 1 ton dumpy bags of Lime mortar, ballast and cement to last my lifetime.
'...and laying concrete as a ballast isnt like laying a concrete floor in a workshop.' eh???!!! For your information, concrete doesn't 'dry out'; the water chemically reacts with the cement and becomes part of the final solid mass.
Beetlebank 1 year ago
@theprodicalsonishere Yes, some watert lays on the surface and subsequently evaporates, however the vast bulk of the water is involved in the hydration of the cement. Not only do I quote the internet, I understand what I quote;-)
Beetlebank 1 year ago
@Beetlebank jeesus pedantic or what usually when water no longer has the appearance of water most people are happy to say 'its evapourated' we also see the floor of the van at a few differant points in the video! with not a lump of concrete in sight
theprodicalsonishere 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
don't worry the 57 mexicans in the back were fine.
StobbsN 1 year ago 82
@StobbsN haahahahahahaahaha!!!!!!!!!!
legonightmare65 11 months ago
yo si estoy deacuerdo con el asunto de la carga por que yo he cargado mi t3 con 1255 kg de concreto y la altura de la suspencion es la misma que en este video pero yo si he notado una diferencia con otros videos de t3 , es que la t3 fue fabricada con la totalidad estructural del techo si pueden accesar a otro video de t3 notaran que el vehiculo depende de la estructura que lleva interna el techo la cual evita que el chasis de doble hacia abajo
fabianherrera2106 1 year ago
my neighbor has the orange truck. the first one that crashes. its yellow but maybe i should convice him to buy a diffrent car...........
RevolverLover101 1 year ago
As German as sauerkraut? What's funny is sauerkraut originated in China.
whamazoom 1 year ago
If you look at 0:13 you san see the truck is already crashed a little.
chrisclarkcustoms 1 year ago
at least they saved that 1 ton of weight.
icouldntmakeupaname 1 year ago
aua das wut bestimmt richtig weh :)
K3NWOODD 1 year ago
I don't agree!There is no air bag!The brain may be hurt.
What will happen if this car crash with Rolls-Royce Phantom EWD at 240km/h?
Supcharged 1 year ago
@Supcharged at that speed, regardless the car you are driving, a crash would be fatal
ToInfinity1 1 year ago
Ugh... thank god, you told about the test conditions later... in the beginning of the vid, i was absolutely shocked about the heavy destruction of the drivers cabin... If this would had been a "real test", with such results, it would making you thinking a lot, about the Millions of these VW T3 on the road...
Clerence1969 1 year ago
great vid. nice to see someone setting folk straight over 'that other vid'.
for a twenty year old car, imo, they are pretty safe.
however i do drive a t3 at 100kmh with a ton in the back EEK!
lughole 1 year ago
@lughole if you are driveing enything with 1ton in the back at 100mph your stuppid....
jannikmt 1 year ago
@jannikmt
kmh,learn to read.
one p in stupid.
lughole 1 year ago
yeah my cousin said your a fake Volkswagen enthusiast who made these in photoshop and he said the first test is real. is that true?
Nevanator7 1 year ago
@Nevanator7 Conspiracy theorists unite!
mikosoft 1 year ago
You just have to stay in the cargo-room to survive a crash in the car.
That's why, in Africa for example, people prefer to sit/stay at the back end of old busses.
Naflord 1 year ago
you must eat to sauerkraut weißwurst! and i hate other states when they make so vere sick copys.
sry my englsih is not very well i come from germany^^
coolwatcher007 1 year ago
thx 4 video
MetroFunX 1 year ago
Everyone commenting here so far is wrong...
It's actually the T3 "accordion" model.
colonelerotic 1 year ago 8
I might also point out that this is clearly an old vehicle. Crash tests are performed with new model cars probably nearly all the time, which is yet more evidence that this is not one of the normal crash tests.
hebneh 1 year ago
finally someone who posted the TRUTH about this test!
Thank you guy. Now i go on drive arround in my beloved T3, cruising arround, waiting for prey and leave nothing behind than mutilated corsas and scooter kids! :D
guntruckfahrer 1 year ago 5
GREAAT 5* to send to some places....
Celso463 1 year ago
lol.. everyone knows except the ones that commented shit below, that it was loaded with 1 tonns of weight in the back, and was running around 70-100 km/h---
Sanyey 1 year ago
i love america
DEVINVISHOTT 2 years ago
Chinese crap, not a real thing
suarneduj 2 years ago
THAT IS THE FACILITY TEST
IRCip 2 years ago 5
Check the real T3 crashtest qO_AfCFQR2M
Posthuman83 2 years ago
That why it titles "This is not a crash test of the T3" so yes it's not a T3
fmcbule 2 years ago
It is, in fact, a crash test of a T3, going 5 km/h with no weight added! I know that because I worked there, during the test!
Yeah... sarcasm over. I can't believe the level of retardation, here on YouTube. It's a Chinese van... indeed...
dharvell 2 years ago
Comment removed
alexauto321 2 years ago
Volkswagen is a german car manufactor. Not a chinese one.
alexauto321 2 years ago 7
Chinese cars crumple just like that.
stalkingalizee 1 year ago
@alexauto: thanks you finaly made it clear. It must have had serious reason that poor T3 crashed so badly. many other comments just blame without any knowledge...
MrKiraly77 2 years ago
It is a old, rusty VW T3. Speed was 80 km/h with 1 ton of weight in the back. Test was made at the ADAC, at the opening of the new testing facility in 1999 in Landsberg, Germany. They wanted to demonstrate the capability of the facility. I know that, because I worked there.
alexauto321 2 years ago 157
@alexauto321
Actually it was more like 60 km/h and the VW bus was a delivery truck.
boogioogigoof 1 year ago
@alexauto321 Yeah! And there was VW Golf 2 and Bug. In Golf crash video you exactly can see, that threshold (bottom) of car was rusty or cut, i have seen 2nd Golfs and Jettas, which have crased at ~50-65 km/h, and deformation was normal, noone died.
KGWOLF77 1 year ago
@KGWOLF77 And the the bug was designed at the 30`s,,, Almost all other crash test cars are -90`s or new generation. I think,that bug survied very vell.
kkohouta 1 year ago
@KGWOLF77 what massive cabin intrusion? yes normal for that class of car in the late 1980's. but still at 30mph your loosing at least a leg
theprodicalsonishere 1 year ago
@alexauto321 at 0:10 we all see that the truck is empty ... where is the 1 ton of weight ? r u serius? omg.
lianmix 1 year ago
@alexauto321 Wow I worked there too, do you remember me ?
007bondspy 1 year ago
@alexauto321 cool and my father is obama
joedawg112 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@alexauto321
IHS: less fatalities, (with SAAB 900 and VOLVO 240), from any other car for years 1984-1988.
FOLKSAM: highest safety grade + 40% for the year 2001 and previous.
SYNCRO: even better for technical reasons in terms of passive and active safety.
So t3 is not simply good. It is between the best!
(If you need the links for the above mentioned documents, please ask me, because the systen does not allow me to put them here).
MrHellenicvanagon 10 months ago
@alexauto321 You worked there and ur 26 yr old... hmm i didn't know they hired 14 yr olds back in 1999
gazzxr 6 months ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
... THIS ISNT A VW, ITS A CHINESE VAN!
jcbiddulph 2 years ago
@jcbiddulph ... "THIS ISNT A VW, ITS A CHINESE VAN!"
Good lord. Even surrounded by information, you vomit b.s. No wonder America is in such deep trouble, American citizens are unable to process simple facts.
73VW1800 2 years ago 6
Its NOT a chinese van, its aT3 loaded to max run in high speed, stop for god sakes saying tath.
smirnofowner 2 years ago 5
This is a car for china, Volkswagen german makes better quality in germany
blower069 2 years ago
LOOK at the bumper! It is crookedly established, that means, in this t3 deformation element was cutted out!
KGWOLF77 2 years ago
yes
laynesamba 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
OMFG!! This car is completely safe, if you have a deathwish xD
Kazka13 2 years ago
Hell! The T3 was loaded with a TON of weight and runned with 120 km'/h into the wall! What do you think would happen to any other Car in this situation? They would -pulverize!-
TheMCMXXL 2 years ago
В данный Т3 положили груз. 2 тонны в кузове. Перед испытанием инженерам пришлось усиливать подвеску, так как заводская не выдержала. Читайте что написанно во время ролика!!!
maxcrol1 2 years ago
ya uhhh.... english please? stuiped russian....
xxpwnageboyxx 2 years ago
stupid racist
laynesamba 2 years ago
English please
rudolflandini 2 years ago
Erst einmal ist das kein "BUS" sondern eine Doppelkabine!!! zweitens hatte die "Doka" Gewichte auf der Ladefläche!
Drittens wurde mit dem Test eine neue Teststrecke "eingeführt"!!!
dokabernd 2 years ago
Well you can load your T3 up with some heavy stuff but I don't think that little van could carry enough weight to create such carnage at normal speeds. When you have a head on impact with a concrete wall at 60mph you'll be fucked up anyway.
asaluste007 2 years ago
Jeah... the T3 is a tank!! (compared to other 80ies vehicles...) ;)
G00G00L 2 years ago
The first car likes a vw but it is not.
xd Whahah funny
1996Maurice 2 years ago
Wat
n1Erik90 2 years ago
Comment removed
cchhrriisse 2 years ago
At last someone puts it into context, but you have to worry about all those people who believe all they see and don't think about it, scary. Person who posted those "Chinese truck" vids must be laughing his head off.
bunning63 2 years ago
The first crash test is a car made in China the others chash test are Volswagen T3 .
amg200i 2 years ago
Comment removed
sillenHDsportster 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this VW is the China
amg200i 2 years ago
vw is germany car (1983)
chinafuckaltaipig 2 years ago 5
The facility test was uploaded by some idiot as crash test of a chinese truck, yes.
Vallecrash 2 years ago 2
Thats great, but the whole point of buying a van is so that you can load it up, with either people or miscellaneous materials for what ever reason.....in saying that the first test counts for 9 out of 10 people which will be driving their *loaded* van.
billybobthornton1000 2 years ago
The test was at about 62 mph.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
You are right, worry how people believe what they see/hear...
bunning63 2 years ago 2
its more safetly to stay in the back of the truck :)))
vldthenigga 2 years ago
so dos that mean that the t 25 would fold up like a accordion if you had a load on lol
fitninoit 2 years ago
Thanks for posting this. That guy from HK is talking a lot of bs, sadly most people fall for it.
zoppo9999 2 years ago
the guy isnt from hk
he is a evil japs
chinafuckturkpig 2 years ago
its a t25
drfrasse 2 years ago
thanks for clearing that up. It obviously was carrying a lot of weight. But still, some people would load it like that, and they risk a crash (sadly).
NorthwesternNL 2 years ago
Thanks a lot for the insight!
mikosoft 2 years ago
Good job! I was to uncertain with this video, because my father had a T3 and was involved in an accident with a golf 2 golf course and the run about 80-90 km / h and was made pieces and T3 only slightly deformed and the radiator was broken. (sorry for me ugly english)
And4ea8 2 years ago
gracias por la explicación!!
tengo una t3 y estaba un poco acojonado desde que vi ese video. Además no había encontrado ningún otro sobre tests de choque de este modelo.
me quedo mucho más tranquilo!!
tank you! now I feel more safety whit my t3!!
escarabajodelapatata 2 years ago
Big Difference!
Brent
BrentAudi 2 years ago
hate to break it up for you guys, but the car was loaded with tons of shit in the back so that WV could check how the car will crash when it's really heavy.
No magic, al-qaeda or shitty engineering. Just a different type of test.
56KbModem 2 years ago
pause it a o.15 look at the front somthing is missing
utubeb14 2 years ago
Please teach me dealer shop of this car.
CHNPower 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is no T3. It's a chinese fake car
FlownW 2 years ago
so much for backseat is allways safe
dahgutone 2 years ago
А еще говорят что ГАЗель хреновая машина.
vitalijresler 2 years ago
Hmm.....I'm looking for strong vw camper bus / van.........show me. Please?
Call me.
McKNUCKLEHEAD20 3 years ago
stop it at 0:14 look at the front of it some thing i not right
utubeb14 3 years ago
im guessing that it was an authentic T3, they probably just had it goin 80 lol.
cLoCkWoRk12489 3 years ago
or had some weight in it too
flybikes90 3 years ago
its a pickup so its possible that with a full load this could happen in real life. Thats what pickups do, they haul heavy leads in back.
joness105639 2 years ago
Thank you for that video, I already wondered if the crash test video was a fake or something like that.
One guy uploaded the crash test video and calls it a test of a Chinese car and deletes all comments putting that right. Too stupid! :-)
Tabbo107 3 years ago 22
thank you for helping the world sort out this big mistake !!!
OpelKadett1980 3 years ago 11
Volvo 745: Head Injury-3,868, Head Impact 200G, Chest Impact 65G; VW T3 Head Injury 155, Head Impact 42G, Chest Impact 30G.
So much for Volvo safety. Also, Youtube search Volkswagen T3 Crash Test Video 3 of 3
I have a 2003 T4 VW Eurovan and wish the USA would allow Americans to buy the T5 and the upcoming T5.5 Oh well, guess I'll have to smuggle one in from Mexico and swap VIN numbers. JK
demossmd 3 years ago
When it comes to big versus small, the passengers in a bigger car almost always have the advantage.
RealizedRealization 3 years ago
I beg to differ, I flipped over a 1998 Chevy venture with a 1987 Hyundai Pony 1.6.
I was going 90 (KM/h) and he was going 50, I caught him on the driver's corner with the driver's side of mine, and he climbed my car and skidded for 10-15 feet. No one was injured in my car.
In fact, I have the engine in another Pony.
The car honestly didn't look too bad (write off) but heh... why bother having crumple zones when you can use the other cars'? ;)
Jed118 2 years ago
Hopefully..
numchukh 3 years ago
Thank you so much for putting this video up to help sort out the confusion. You should add that the "VW crash test" was done at over 80 mph with a load of roughly 2 tons in the back.
Shaggyshadric 3 years ago 2
I LOVE THAT BUS !!!!!!!!!!!!!
alihassan321 3 years ago 3
mhmhm goood car ! :D
redspicee 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your actually defending this hunk of shit van thing? PATHETIC.
Mittenman88 3 years ago
Those real tests does not have loads. It is a pick-up truck and people DO carry heavy loads. Without loads, the occupants may survive, but with loads, zero survivors. Great video though!
BoredTrucker1902 3 years ago
It was over 2tons of load added. They ended up reinforcing the rear suspension because the weight was more than what the VW was rated for. They had to make those modifications for the purpose of safety. If the rear suspension gave out, the truck may have swung in either direction. No stock VW of that style would be able to carry that much weight. At least not safely. I personally owned a 71 bus, They are surprisingly solid in a crash. I crashed at 40 mph into a Saturn and drove away fine.
Shaggyshadric 3 years ago 5
pelo - ,a suposta mercadoria esta salva
XD
bibicomobile 3 years ago
Now I get a better thought of my car :)
Skarfar90 3 years ago
it's a safe one.
whattheheck1000 3 years ago
good job
geomod18 3 years ago
wowt,your a star ! well done,and thanks very much.
dogfisheyes 3 years ago
and in the 1st t3 crash the van is probably doing 60+ mph (96+ kilos)
whattheheck1000 3 years ago 2
don't think that's enough
Draven84 3 years ago
And the part where the test was shown backwards, it's just so neat - the van repairs itself.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago 5
Well, there is no crumple zone, but this is an old van. Even if there was a crumple zone, it would help much as old designs were too stiff to deform properly. And I think that that T3 crash test speed was at much faster speeds than current standards.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
alexkvaskov, the van does have a crumple zone. it is built into the chassis in front of the wheels.
richardmaudsley77 2 years ago
well obviously wasn't effective
it was probably going at a very high speed that even today's vehicles with lots of safety features cannot protect from
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
Yeah. I bet a modern VW transporter or ford transit would do the exact same thing with all that weight in the back, and all the speed. The 80's VW bus was famous at the time for kicking volvo's ass, safety wise.
richardmaudsley77 2 years ago 3
and a ton of cargo
kleppwood 2 years ago
yay i bet that t3 can stand against h1 :P lol
gownomac 3 years ago
great video, that first part is very scary but it seems to hold up pretty well to real crashs
icantthink4155 3 years ago