@Tundraboy05 likewise, the word "vertice" is used throughout the computer graphics world, though the actual word should be "vertex." Using the correct word will show that you are truly a professional. If you can find a professional published usage or definition of the word "vortice," as being different from the word "vortex" or interchangeable, I will concede the point. Otherwise, I recommend you use the word "vortex" and encourage your Tornado-Chasing colleagues to do the same.
@Tundraboy05 likewise, the word "vertice" is used throughout the computer graphics world, though the actual word should be "vertex." Using the correct word will show that you are truly a professional. If you can find a professional published usage or definition of the word "vortice," as being different from the word "vortex" or interchangeable, I will concede the point. Otherwise, I recommend you use the word "vortex" and encourage your Tornado-Chasing colleagues to do the same.
If anyone was wondering, they are called wingtip vortices but they are created by the entire wing as a whole, and shed at the tip. You can't create a wing that generates lift and doesn't do this too
@xXRacer9000Xx Yes it does. When learning to fly you will learn about this type of thing. It's called Wake turbulence and happens from all aircraft. The problem arises with wake turbulence from big aircraft overpowering small aircraft. I have seen a 737's wake turbulence flip a single engine Cessna. While taking off in a Cessna 172 the controller will clear you
@xXRacer9000Xx Also While taking off in a Cessna 172 after a large aircraft, the controller will clear you for takeoff and tell you caution wake turbulence. This lets you know it might be present. The 172 is much lighter and will come off the ground before the large aircraft. But those large acft will climb at a faster rate. So the small acft would end up flying through his wake turbulence. After yout ake off in the cessna the procedure is to immediately move off to one side to fly around it
This is actually very important to know for pilots. Wing tip vortices have brought down small planes and passenger jets alike. This is why there are rules governing the distance between planes.
You aren't kidding! Whereas wing tip vortices can bring a plane down to the ground, Obamas polices are just as dangerous, since they'll bring down the country!
Very old video showing an A model with filthy smoke belching engines (that was fixed). I took part in a vortice study on the drop zone enviroment back in 1987. We mounted smoke generators on the wingtips using the landing lights for the electrical circuit. Did they tests staging out of Davis Monthan (we came out of Travis) and flying around Yuma. Tests ran about 2 weeks. I have video of it and should transfer it to DVD and then YouTube. Thanks. Check out my video of the USAFJill Metzger Scandal!
when designing the airbus A380 they did some testing in a tunnle, they were trying to figure out how to minimize the wake turbulence, and that why it has winglets
@slaneyboi no the engine cause jetwash the wingtips cause wingtip vortices both create what is known as wake turbulence. the use of winglets reduce lift-induced drag result in a less prominent wingtip vortex. do you even fly? lemme guess your an atp rated fsx pilot
@sk8rguy178 Lmfao, i posted that comment years ago, i was just beginning my PPL. I have done 33 hours now in a Cessna 150, im going for my night flying and instrument rating when i should acheive my PPL, sorry.
the vortices will go downwards, but it will take approximately half a minute.. see other videos. the overpressure beneath the wing will compensate for the underpressure on the upper side. to minimize this induced drag, aircraft have wingtips or winglets.
They do fall at something like 900 ft. a minute, but it is already at the ground. Once they get to the ground they just move laterally. Check the Far-aim if you're a pilot.
Wingtip vortices are caused by the acceleration of the air around the wing. It spirals outward and downward, and will blow a little Cessna right off the runway. Heavy, clean and slow.
The jet streams are large moving masses of air between the troposphere and the stratospere that are a lot like rivers in the sky that flow all the way around the world. They move anywhere from 150-300 miles per hour. This is why commercial jets fly in them. A tailwind of 300 miles per hour get you there faster.
If the approaching aircraft if there is another "wake turbulence" What is the rate of the turbulence to produce?
- If an aircraft wake turbulence category is high, in front of the THY plane made up, how many miles of air traffic separation is made between ünitesince? Is it necessary for caution?
The aircraft preceding THY1951 was a B757. Officialy qualified as a medium aircraft, but ATC regards it as a heavy one because of it's severe wake turbulence.
Minimum separation on landing between a medium (737) preceded by heavy(757) is 2 minutes. Those 2 minutes include a safe margin.
On an airport like Schiphol one can expect that ATC has complied with those minimums, so it would really surprise me if wake turbulence was the reason of 1951's crash..
Go to the front of the plane created by the 'wake turbulence' may cause. Despite this success in landing configuration, "he said. Sen, belong to Northwest Airlines Boeing 757 type aircraft in the area two minutes before that, the air traffic unit in such a situation the safety distance between two aircraft should distinguish reminded.
hi...this is just a thought....correct me if i am wrong but this is an example of a lift induced drag that results from the turbulent air of the upper and lower surface of the wing that meet each other and form vortice ?????
My father used to be a pilot of light aircraft many years ago and one day took his friend up for a flight over the home town. He took off after a large aircraft before him and got caught in the vortex which subsequently flipped his aircraft over. Dad, being an experienced pilot, said that it was very frightening. His friend, who openly admitted to dad that he was a little scared by flying and had to be encouraged for weeks to do it to get over his fear, shit himself. Like, touch cloth style.....
youre correct dude, Im a pilot myself, they teach you in school to lift off before the point where the heavy jet did it, and try to outclimb it.. yet we know its impossible since a small airplane can never outclimb a jet, so the best thing is to wait at least 3 to 5 min after the fatso took off to give it a try.. I hope I never get the chance to experience what your dad did, I might not survive as he did...
I'd have shit myself too! Only because I probably wouldn't be the one doing the flying. As long as I am in control, I am unafraid. My fate is in my hands kind of thing.
Yes it's absolutely possible to fly upside down so that wasn't a proplem. It was just that, at 150 feet off the ground, being forced to fly upside down was a little unsettling!
even though it looks like the left wing comes close to the tower the vortex looks like it is rotating the wrong way for the port wing. when vortecies are formed the high pressure air leaks around the wingtip to get to the relatively low pressure above the wing therefore the port vortex should rotate clockwise when viewed from behind not counter clockwise. This footage may be of two separate experiments or it could be highlighting the drift of vortecies though the windsock is pretty limp.
PORT is the left side matie.....This rotation is counter clock wise. Therefore it's indicitive of WTV off the STARBOARD (right) wing. Air flow comes out from the bottom of the wing and rotates upward and inboard. A 'PORT' (left) wing tip vortice would be viewed as 'clockwise' from the rear......You dig?
You've got it backwards. Air rises off port wing, moves away from fuse, drops moves inwards, and rises. From the rear this is anticlockwise. So it's the port wing.
Nope. You're still wrong. The air away from fuse above the wing, and towards the fuse under the wing (though by this time it's behind the wing). On the port wing that's anticlockwise (viewed from the rear).
Stucollet, you're correct. I'm not sure HOW d1rcwill is looking at this but he has it backwards. The test tower is off the right (starboard) wing at the time the acft passes by.
Why did the bottom smoke start rotating first, since the swirling air descended into it from above? Smoke on top should have started swirling upward first & the eye descending through it. THere's a screaching tire on a gravel road.
Now, that was fuel effiency back in the day right there.... see white lines at high altitude and black lines at low altitude, haha
108107643 1 month ago
wake turbulence
rumpastumpa 2 months ago
mortal kombat II
andybarone1984 2 months ago
C-5A Wing VORTEX Tests at NASA Langley Research Centre (or Center, if you prefer).
JBofBrisbane 3 months ago
its a black hole o.O
Merlin198713 4 months ago
looks like a moody blues album cover...he, he
menelfloss 5 months ago
Video intended for those who disregard "Cautionwaketurbulence." :-)
radtech21 6 months ago
wtf is that!?
rottencactus28 6 months ago
WOW! Time travel is possible!!!
kinsley2108 8 months ago
ha ha ha! good one about the ex wife
ntiffin1 9 months ago
If this exceeds your wingspan and you fly into it, enjoy the unintended roll...
partenavia 10 months ago
Reminds me of my ex-wife and my money.
danm981 10 months ago 57
That's quite a wake.
GoofballLtG 10 months ago
Thats not a blackhole thats a Portal instance to a raid dungeon
bluecshield 11 months ago 11
Frickin Awesome !!
Johnny64ism 11 months ago
omg this is the most clearly way to show me what is a wingtip vortex thanx man! this is so weird :D
Gh0StSecurity 11 months ago
No CGI here!
Remington1875 1 year ago
HAHAHA C-5A Galaxy = Cloud of Smoke that looks like a Galaxy :D Double FTW or Double PWNED!
Ilivemindfreak 1 year ago 2
fucking idiots, is impossible that can be a black hole
metallicaafeb 1 year ago
@metallicaafeb tit
Deathstar11978 1 year ago
@Deathstar11978 pff
metallicaafeb 1 year ago
@Deathstar11978 jaj and .. who would come being you? (:
metallicaafeb 1 year ago
I can assure you that is a black hole on earth, that is what NAZA does, making black holes around the globe day in day out
oggybodoggy 1 year ago
@oggybodoggy idiot
metallicaafeb 1 year ago
@metallicaafeb I was trying to be Ironic/Sarcastic, sorry that you didn't understand
oggybodoggy 1 year ago
@oggybodoggy (;
metallicaafeb 1 year ago
You are cleared for take off following a heavy C-5A ,Caution wake turbulence.
nigelolympia 1 year ago
vortex vorTEX!! Not vortice! >_<
meganite03 1 year ago
@meganite03 A VORTICE IS A MINI TORNADO.
SO SHUSH.
Tundraboy05 1 year ago
@Tundraboy05 The word "vortice" does not exist. Singular: vortex; plural: vortices.
meganite03 1 year ago
@meganite03 Oh well, it's used commonly throughout the Tornado-Chasing service, maybe it should be a word.
Tundraboy05 1 year ago
@Tundraboy05 likewise, the word "vertice" is used throughout the computer graphics world, though the actual word should be "vertex." Using the correct word will show that you are truly a professional. If you can find a professional published usage or definition of the word "vortice," as being different from the word "vortex" or interchangeable, I will concede the point. Otherwise, I recommend you use the word "vortex" and encourage your Tornado-Chasing colleagues to do the same.
meganite03 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tundraboy05 likewise, the word "vertice" is used throughout the computer graphics world, though the actual word should be "vertex." Using the correct word will show that you are truly a professional. If you can find a professional published usage or definition of the word "vortice," as being different from the word "vortex" or interchangeable, I will concede the point. Otherwise, I recommend you use the word "vortex" and encourage your Tornado-Chasing colleagues to do the same.
meganite03 1 year ago
Exploredia,com
Exploredia 1 year ago
If anyone was wondering, they are called wingtip vortices but they are created by the entire wing as a whole, and shed at the tip. You can't create a wing that generates lift and doesn't do this too
bleedinfingers 1 year ago
If it "looked" like a black hole then technically you wouldnt be able to see it .. right?
HeliumFreak17 1 year ago
@ stuartic
xD The plane had a lot of fun in Mi(y)anus xD
1993phillipB 1 year ago
looks like a bruised anus !!!
stuartic 1 year ago
Very poor representation.
Why not show UNCUT film of the aircraft going over.
Why not show until dissipation?
robertgift 1 year ago 3
@robertgift the footage doesn't exist or is extremely hard to find.
xxcurnuxx 1 year ago
HAARP testing?
yoshihawv 1 year ago
That's what comes out my arse after a curry
yemenarGTR 1 year ago 3
star gate nigga
EmperorOfMars 1 year ago
i was lookin for the house and the witch on the broom (ill get u my pretty muhahahah )
thebig419 1 year ago
thats a time tunnel, any fool can see that :P
allanafraser 1 year ago
damn thats sick!!!!! it looks like a tornado
DKF22 1 year ago
It's called wake turbulence you idiots...Look it up.
CombatRadar 1 year ago
That is exactly what killed Goose in top gun. Bastards!!!
treborobotacon 1 year ago
It just opened a gateway to hell!
raven1234 1 year ago
damn thats f***ed up i wonder if that screws up the next plane coming
xXRacer9000Xx 1 year ago
@xXRacer9000Xx Yes it does. When learning to fly you will learn about this type of thing. It's called Wake turbulence and happens from all aircraft. The problem arises with wake turbulence from big aircraft overpowering small aircraft. I have seen a 737's wake turbulence flip a single engine Cessna. While taking off in a Cessna 172 the controller will clear you
FunktasticLucky 1 year ago
@FunktasticLucky damn....thats insane....
xXRacer9000Xx 1 year ago
@xXRacer9000Xx Also While taking off in a Cessna 172 after a large aircraft, the controller will clear you for takeoff and tell you caution wake turbulence. This lets you know it might be present. The 172 is much lighter and will come off the ground before the large aircraft. But those large acft will climb at a faster rate. So the small acft would end up flying through his wake turbulence. After yout ake off in the cessna the procedure is to immediately move off to one side to fly around it
FunktasticLucky 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
/watch?v=VH-KDGRwwck - Russian documentary about NATO transport aviation. Including C-5 Galaxy, C-141 Starlifter, C-17 Globemaster III
BitnikGr 1 year ago
that is cool
huntercra 1 year ago
DIVIDED BY 0 OH SHI-
Jameslh605 1 year ago
Looks like a black hole.
JechtAeon 1 year ago 3
It's actually a vortex. The plural is vortices.
JBofBrisbane 1 year ago
better tell that to nasa. they're the ones who made the video...
xXning3nXx 1 year ago
Of course if you know aerodynamics, there are two wing tip vortices! No?
Not counting the vortex made by the flap!
Helicopterpilot16 1 year ago
^_^
moshi7kimi 2 years ago
y did it cut from :09 to :11??
wish it was one video
to see how the smoke ended up that way
sheldordaworrior 2 years ago
if anyone watches the end of the 2nd die hard movie, they can see a GREAT example of wing vorticies when a plane lands through smoke.
crazysunami 2 years ago 2
true dude .
bazzerpeck25 2 years ago
@crazysunami I've noticed it and its an awsome view of em! Aerodynamics rocks
Helicopterpilot16 2 years ago
the fast wind of the pane colliding with the still air creates a sideways tornado. is that easy?
snooppupc130jrketmas 2 years ago
??? sooooooooo.......... the black hole was made by the airplane ???
aguirreruru 2 years ago
This is actually very important to know for pilots. Wing tip vortices have brought down small planes and passenger jets alike. This is why there are rules governing the distance between planes.
anonymouslogon6 2 years ago 2
It looks like a black hole with some spinning matter around it.
Look at center,it's black (or dark).
85kanuto 2 years ago
i can promise you 100% its not a black hole :P
Splooshiba 2 years ago 75
I know it wasn't a real black hole but it looks like a real at 0:22.
The center was black (or dark).
It would be terrible if this would be a real black hole ;-P
85kanuto 2 years ago
yea basicly, we would not be sitting here typing away on youtube right now if that was a black hole =P
ElRhinoProductions 2 years ago
@Splooshiba Or mayabe it isss aa ? ;DD
iBizkitas 1 year ago
it looks like the gateway to hell
nataliev83 2 years ago 4
More like the gateway to Obama
raunchbear 2 years ago
You aren't kidding! Whereas wing tip vortices can bring a plane down to the ground, Obamas polices are just as dangerous, since they'll bring down the country!
anonymouslogon6 2 years ago
Comment removed
nataliev83 2 years ago
It looked more like the Oblivion Gate ..hehehe
zabyjaku 2 years ago 2
That Look like a tornado twist
Somewin14 2 years ago
lol
alancoolio 2 years ago
Very old video showing an A model with filthy smoke belching engines (that was fixed). I took part in a vortice study on the drop zone enviroment back in 1987. We mounted smoke generators on the wingtips using the landing lights for the electrical circuit. Did they tests staging out of Davis Monthan (we came out of Travis) and flying around Yuma. Tests ran about 2 weeks. I have video of it and should transfer it to DVD and then YouTube. Thanks. Check out my video of the USAFJill Metzger Scandal!
IdolHans 2 years ago 2
riveting tale, chap!
7Goggles7 2 years ago 2
Now you understand and SEE how much it's dangerous for a ligh plane O_O
Faucon551237 2 years ago
Do they still do this or do they just do it in the wind tunnel now?
SteveCessna152 2 years ago
when designing the airbus A380 they did some testing in a tunnle, they were trying to figure out how to minimize the wake turbulence, and that why it has winglets
sk8rguy178 2 years ago
Comment removed
slaneyboi 1 year ago
Comment removed
sk8rguy178 1 year ago
@slaneyboi no the engine cause jetwash the wingtips cause wingtip vortices both create what is known as wake turbulence. the use of winglets reduce lift-induced drag result in a less prominent wingtip vortex. do you even fly? lemme guess your an atp rated fsx pilot
sk8rguy178 1 year ago
@sk8rguy178 Lmfao, i posted that comment years ago, i was just beginning my PPL. I have done 33 hours now in a Cessna 150, im going for my night flying and instrument rating when i should acheive my PPL, sorry.
slaneyboi 1 year ago
@slaneyboi
thats funny.
terryk1233 1 year ago
@slaneyboi sorry dude, it is the wingtips that cause wake turbulence.
Hondaridr58 1 year ago
@slaneyboi
from the engines? and you just called someone out for talking shit? ......i love it
terryk1233 1 year ago
I thought the vortex went downwards. But here it looks like the turbulence stays in the air.
otoevst 2 years ago
the vortices will go downwards, but it will take approximately half a minute.. see other videos. the overpressure beneath the wing will compensate for the underpressure on the upper side. to minimize this induced drag, aircraft have wingtips or winglets.
thomaskroon 2 years ago
it does its creates a swirling disturbance as you can see....they move outward from the plane not down
dem3993 2 years ago
They do fall at something like 900 ft. a minute, but it is already at the ground. Once they get to the ground they just move laterally. Check the Far-aim if you're a pilot.
Chopin742 2 years ago
Very interesting. Thanks for uploading.
moopoo23 2 years ago
looks like a black hole
xregizorx 2 years ago 37
Now we know what a black hole looks like
desinate 2 years ago
@xregizorx You can't see a black hole... ;)
Rocktheworld10x 1 year ago
@xregizorx you can't see black holes
damienoneillbree 1 year ago
what's that?
tusiunia12 2 years ago
Wingtip vortices are caused by the acceleration of the air around the wing. It spirals outward and downward, and will blow a little Cessna right off the runway. Heavy, clean and slow.
jordanburr74 2 years ago
is that wat a jet stream is?
adzmc123 2 years ago
The jet streams are large moving masses of air between the troposphere and the stratospere that are a lot like rivers in the sky that flow all the way around the world. They move anywhere from 150-300 miles per hour. This is why commercial jets fly in them. A tailwind of 300 miles per hour get you there faster.
jordanburr74 2 years ago
Jet stremas not only get airliners to thier destinations faster, it also saves more fuel. I'm just adding from what you had stated.
FA22RaiseHell 2 years ago
Wake turbulence, I think.
Weirdo10o4 2 years ago
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
tubulus3 2 years ago
yeah anyone flies through that shit... you're gonna get rolled
jwigiMT 2 years ago
you mean like this ?
watch?v=Yu_moia-oVI
ChampionServices777 2 years ago
good one. that made my day
spidertron99 2 years ago
i saw the same thing when i pulled your moms pants down......... the galaxy and a black hole!
Floatsforlife 2 years ago
crash boing 737/800 amsterdam
If the approaching aircraft if there is another "wake turbulence" What is the rate of the turbulence to produce?
- If an aircraft wake turbulence category is high, in front of the THY plane made up, how many miles of air traffic separation is made between ünitesince? Is it necessary for caution?
5353LAZ 2 years ago
The aircraft preceding THY1951 was a B757. Officialy qualified as a medium aircraft, but ATC regards it as a heavy one because of it's severe wake turbulence.
Minimum separation on landing between a medium (737) preceded by heavy(757) is 2 minutes. Those 2 minutes include a safe margin.
On an airport like Schiphol one can expect that ATC has complied with those minimums, so it would really surprise me if wake turbulence was the reason of 1951's crash..
WesselB 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
5353LAZ 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Go to the front of the plane created by the 'wake turbulence' may cause. Despite this success in landing configuration, "he said. Sen, belong to Northwest Airlines Boeing 757 type aircraft in the area two minutes before that, the air traffic unit in such a situation the safety distance between two aircraft should distinguish reminded.
5353LAZ 2 years ago
this shit is cause of thy 737 crash in amsterdam.
atillayayla2456 2 years ago
hi...this is just a thought....correct me if i am wrong but this is an example of a lift induced drag that results from the turbulent air of the upper and lower surface of the wing that meet each other and form vortice ?????
KERVERAS 3 years ago
So...
What does it help solve exactly?
peepeevagi 3 years ago
it help us visualize why many aircraft have crashed when landing after a heavy jet, and its a powerful reminder not to do it...
kubanpanzer 3 years ago
coolest thing ive ever seen
pjm5678 3 years ago
that is insane
darcougar 3 years ago
Probably one of the coolest things I've ever seen. Fluids & Aerodynamics is amazing.
amkuc27 3 years ago
inside job
sverio12345 3 years ago
My father used to be a pilot of light aircraft many years ago and one day took his friend up for a flight over the home town. He took off after a large aircraft before him and got caught in the vortex which subsequently flipped his aircraft over. Dad, being an experienced pilot, said that it was very frightening. His friend, who openly admitted to dad that he was a little scared by flying and had to be encouraged for weeks to do it to get over his fear, shit himself. Like, touch cloth style.....
rosepubmuso 3 years ago
youre correct dude, Im a pilot myself, they teach you in school to lift off before the point where the heavy jet did it, and try to outclimb it.. yet we know its impossible since a small airplane can never outclimb a jet, so the best thing is to wait at least 3 to 5 min after the fatso took off to give it a try.. I hope I never get the chance to experience what your dad did, I might not survive as he did...
kubanpanzer 3 years ago
I'd have shit myself too! Only because I probably wouldn't be the one doing the flying. As long as I am in control, I am unafraid. My fate is in my hands kind of thing.
GeneralKenobiSIYE 3 years ago
You can still fly a plane upsidedown though, can't you? Also, How high above the ground was this?
Man, that must have been VERY frightening!
IloveSPIDERZ 2 years ago
Yes it's absolutely possible to fly upside down so that wasn't a proplem. It was just that, at 150 feet off the ground, being forced to fly upside down was a little unsettling!
rosepubmuso 2 years ago
lol ... freaky
PR4Y3R 3 years ago
THATS AWESOME
Yamhal 3 years ago
opening a portal to another dimension..... flying into it in a small plane u will fly straight into hell
prince0292 3 years ago 17
I'm not sure about the portal bit. But flying into it will definitely produce some bumpy results!
xlqex 3 years ago 2
and in a small plane, it can send u right 2 hell
DJFiFTY24 3 years ago
Or an early 80's Flash Gordon music video with Queen....
brettv8 3 years ago
@prince0292 It really will, because you crash if you do that! haha.
TheJeffreyklm 1 year ago
a portal to another dimension ...fly into it in a small plane u will fly straight into hell
prince0292 3 years ago 3
like there opening a portal to another dimension.
grooveclubhouse 3 years ago
even though it looks like the left wing comes close to the tower the vortex looks like it is rotating the wrong way for the port wing. when vortecies are formed the high pressure air leaks around the wingtip to get to the relatively low pressure above the wing therefore the port vortex should rotate clockwise when viewed from behind not counter clockwise. This footage may be of two separate experiments or it could be highlighting the drift of vortecies though the windsock is pretty limp.
stucollett 3 years ago
It's rotating the right way for the port wing. Look at some diagrams that show WIG and you'll see.
d1rcwill 3 years ago
PORT is the left side matie.....This rotation is counter clock wise. Therefore it's indicitive of WTV off the STARBOARD (right) wing. Air flow comes out from the bottom of the wing and rotates upward and inboard. A 'PORT' (left) wing tip vortice would be viewed as 'clockwise' from the rear......You dig?
NKS969 3 years ago 2
You've got it backwards. Air rises off port wing, moves away from fuse, drops moves inwards, and rises. From the rear this is anticlockwise. So it's the port wing.
d1rcwill 3 years ago
Well in America(which most of us on Youtube are from) we call it counter-clockwise.
cjracer1000 3 years ago
No-one cares about the word, it's the meaning that matters.
d1rcwill 3 years ago
of corse i was just trying to use comic releif
but i just realised it wasn't funny at all :P
cjracer1000 3 years ago
Sorry, but NKS is correct, it's originating from the starboard wing.
GooseGrl172 3 years ago
Nope. You're still wrong. The air away from fuse above the wing, and towards the fuse under the wing (though by this time it's behind the wing). On the port wing that's anticlockwise (viewed from the rear).
d1rcwill 3 years ago
Sry d1rcwill - you're wrong. The vortex you see in the video comes off the right wing.
skipplet 3 years ago
Stucollet, you're correct. I'm not sure HOW d1rcwill is looking at this but he has it backwards. The test tower is off the right (starboard) wing at the time the acft passes by.
NKS969 3 years ago
interesting would be a C5M with wortec reucing wingtips (winglet or wingtails)
walkandlookup 3 years ago
BLACK HOLE!
1ToNJaB 3 years ago 2
lolooolol
grzesieksz 3 years ago
look how close his wing comes to the top of that tower!!!!!
matt420740 3 years ago
it only looks close but its not
jmcbrid0 3 years ago
Bermuda Triangle weather?
BAYCITYROLLERBOY 3 years ago
Bwah looks so sinister, i love it. I guess is actually is if you're in a small aircraft.
wildblue2 3 years ago
So was there a few of these babies flyin around when Dorothy left kansas?
trahcceb 3 years ago
rip the wing right off what i fly thats for sure prolly the rudder too.
Gharr4126 3 years ago
Thats wild and powerful
DobeDobyDo 3 years ago
spiral of doom
crapper1 3 years ago
your right. up here in alaska several crashes and severe structural damage has been due to wingtip vortices
vader2502005 3 years ago
Tim, get off the radio tower! A black hole is coming right for ya! OMG.
ak49ericeman 4 years ago
omg!! it created a black whole!! lol
d2kool594 4 years ago
Really amazing !
golfcharlie232 4 years ago
dude it looked like a black hole D=
xxxreapercrossxxx 4 years ago
haha circle.
xXxmidgexXx 4 years ago
Thats scary.
Crazyalb92 4 years ago
thats cool
petersm69 4 years ago
Awesome! From an artist's point of view, those colors are actually very nice swirled together..now how's that for unscientific for you? lol.
torigolddust 4 years ago
Awesome!
kingdomboost 4 years ago
wow!
cmscastejon 4 years ago
amazing!
sevenboarder 4 years ago
Why did the bottom smoke start rotating first, since the swirling air descended into it from above? Smoke on top should have started swirling upward first & the eye descending through it. THere's a screaching tire on a gravel road.
niflap 4 years ago
I believe that it started at the top, moved down, then hit the ground, compressed, and moved back up.
SarraPiyopiyo 4 years ago
Best wtv graphics I've seen yet. Looks easily fast enough for a wing suited skydiver to "surf" on.
niflap 4 years ago
you fly too close you will think you're in a washing machine!
shortattentionspan1 4 years ago