Added: 2 years ago
From: LiberalViewer
Views: 29,825
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,200)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @razorsinyourapple

    Actually, economic history shows that when the public believes that a tax cut is temporary, they will spend much less and save the money they now have because of the cut. I think that the bailout worked and that it has just needed a few years to take effect

  • Obama has done nothing but spend spend spend, and Fox news is right. Just because they are the only conservative news network, they get shit from every single liberal there is...

  • @RazorsInYourApple Fuck off with your crazy theories it was Bush and the republican party that fuck the world.

  • @3PiD3MiCGX And what proof do you have to back that up? Obama and his administration have spent more money than ANY president in the history of the USA... COMBINED. God, if you knew anything about politics you wouldn't be liberal.. fucker.

  • @RazorsInYourApple what proof Obama inherited a shitty economy two unnecessary wars and a loss of public trust. he had to spend to stabilize the economy, if you understood economics and politic you would provide facts that bush had no part in the current turmoil the US in embroiled in at the moment. piss of with you stupid opinions you dumb fuck carry on poisoning you mind with half truthes and lies pusscake.

  • @3PiD3MiCGX Pussycake, I'll have to remember that one. Oh and "economics" as you know is a lie... When my credit card is maxed out and I have know where to go, I just take out my check book and spend more... right? Obama's healthcare plan is beyond fictional, it's unstable and uninheritable. It's almost like he's a dictator. I did in fact provide FACTS, Obama has spent more debt than any other president COMBINED!!!! George Bush, I will give you, did spend quite a bit of money.

  • @3PiD3MiCGX But it's been 3 years, don't you think that it there should be some improvement in the job market? In fact history shows that when you lower taxes PEOPLE SPEND... not creating government jobs payed for by the government with the money that the US citizens soon won't have... look at it rationally and not liberally. I don't hate you so please don't be a jerk when you comment to me.

  • Well we see now how his stimulas plan has crippled our economy. It appears to me that fox news hit the nail on the head. We are 12 plus trillion in debt, unemployment at record highs and people are losing their homes everyday. He is the worst president in history. He has spent more money than all other presidents combined.

  • Simply saying 'Fox lies' with no evidence is not a cogent argument it's simply an opinion held by many on the left. They are wrong but they are entitled to their opinion.

  • @carhart001 He did actually cite counter examples, such as the next day's points, and others. Besides, he doesn't claim fox lies as much as he claims that they aren't balanced.

  • Glad to see this is old news.,Thought so. All downhill since then. and come on now Obama and market doesn't compute

  • I can't even watch this upload for more than a minute. If you liberals hate Fox News so much why do you keep watching?

  • @carhart001 To expose them for their lies?

  • @Cream147player Child please.

  • @carhart001 Wow, don't make a rebuttal, just say "child please", as if it is a proper argument.

  • @Zurrash 'Child please' means why should I even waste my time schooling someone with a ridiculous tired point of view that has no evidentiary support.

  • @carhart001 There's a bit of a problem. Exposing Fox for their lies a completely cogent argument to attack Fox News. Next time, make a rebuttal rather than pushing it away and saying "child please", as if it is not a cogent argument.

  • Fox Business is wrong, but if you look at the recovery markets actually made the most significant gains prior to the funds from the stimulus package being implemented. This would suggest that the Stimulus didn't save us from any type of Great Depression, otherwise you are suggesting that the hype for the stimulus is what caused those gains. I can't imagine that is actually the case. Also Axelrod is wrong as well because Bush bailed out the Banks, not Obama.

  • @LibertyInProgress I tell you who takes Fox seriously, dumbass hicks who voted the Gop to be the majority. Their is a bunch of dumb people in America. I hope after they see the way republicans still act they will be smarter next time.

  • How about that Olbermann? Talk about unbias...Yeah it make me what to watch a network that contributes on way or the other

  • "Liberals" do not control the country. "Liberals" do not have a majority. Not all Democrats are "liberals."

  • @baigandine can i just say that you have been making every point that I always try to make about these things? thanks!

  • Ok so Democrats gain a marginal majority in Congress in 2006, and suddenly everything Bush did for the previous 6 years is a total non-factor. Makes perfect sense. Forces were set in motion long before 2006.

  • So when Obama makes a bad decision...this causes the stock market to drop...which causes Obama's ratings to drop...which causes the stock market to rise. Makes perfect sense.

  • You have opened my eyes to the facts about Pres Obama. Numbers don't lie. If the stock market is going up doesn't that mean people are spending more money? This video has put me on the fence about the Obama Administration since before I was completely against it. I still believe that the government has too much control over how OUR tax dollars are being spent.

  • F'ing MORONS! -

  • it's funny how people blame certain political parties for the bad actions that they make. and also, for some reason, the word "liberal" is a bad word, used to denounce somebody.

    ..... the Who were right in their quote: "and the party on the left is now the party on the right."

    politics... what a waste of time because, no matter how important politics are (which is extremely important), nobody seems to agree, or care, about it..... what a shame :(

  • conservatism: racism, religious in-toleration, and plain idiots running our country.

    liberalism: there are some bad aspects to it (a little too much spending, but hey conservatives are like that too, just look at Reagan), but liberalism is technically the best.

    now whats wrong with progressivism? is it wrong to impose child labor laws? is it wrong to create a minimum wage law so that people aren't underpaid? is it wrong to stand up for the rights of women and African Americans?

  • it's a little funny how you point out the bias of fox news...whenever this is probably the most politically biased youtube channel out there. just sayin...

  • Comment removed

  • why does fox hate obama?

  • Comment removed

  • @PatriotWatchUSA no, obama does not hate America. you're just another biased, crazy conservative who's been brainwashed by Foxnews..... funny how I don't see you making the same staements about President Bush, becaue he really was the true spending threat, marxist, jerk, traitor, and he sucked the most. And McCain would have done even worst.... you conservatives disappoint me!

  • @swiftmachine1515 Start paying attention

  • @PatriotWatchUSA you stupid conservatives are ruining America

  • @swiftmachine1515 "you stupid conservatives are ruining America" that's all you can muster? you sound like a six year old that was told no by his parents. I must agree with you agree with you that Bush did ruin this country but Obama is now in the driver's seat and has accelerated the process.

  • Comment removed

  • @PatriotWatchUSA I love people like you, on both sides of the political spectrum in the USoA. Your frothing at the mouth insanity is now MAINSTREAM American political thought. It shows that the great majority of your once powerful nation are now a rabid, clueless mob that will tear your society apart and burn your economy to the ground while the rest of the world watches in astonishment and delight. :)

  • Comment removed

  • @PatriotWatchUSA OMG! You actually believe your elected officials are running the country! Ahahahahaha.

    Take your country back!!!??? The rest of the world will be amazed if you can get your fat ass out of the sofa and away from the TV and pizza, much less take your country back. But hey, best of luck. Remember Romania? They actually had to get to a point where they would rather die than go on under the regime. Your fat asses are a long way from that kind of suffering.

  • Comment removed

  • @PatriotWatchUSA Sure sure, and then you woke up and mummy had made scrambled eggs for breakfast. Stay mad! That's the way they like you, mad as hell and unable to think straight. What's that old saying about the poor? "You can always get one half to kill the other."

  • Comment removed

  • @PatriotWatchUSA You get free fruit cake after every war, or just the ones that you win?

    Ah, Jesus, his name always seems to come up when rationality and reason have failed.

  • @PatriotWatchUSA You are an idiot. I'm not even going to argue you done proved it with countless comments that are not true. Obama has already proven his birthright. Whats next you going to say this is gods country? It is not this is a country of many religions and non religions alike.

  • Comment removed

  • @PatriotWatchUSA Seriously did anyone ask sister fucker war mongering Bush for his birthright? Like Obama said what does he have to do?' tape his birth certifacate to his forehead'. You claim he is a muslem yet Obama proclaims he is christian. You don't go to church on sunday and wonder if your preacher is a muslem do you? You don't your nothing but a hill billy.

  • Comment removed

  • @PatriotWatchUSA Yeah I do how do you think the Gop will makes things any better? They would love to make the middle class working man poor like the poor. We all need to pay the taxs before Bush gave everyone the welfare tax to get back in shape. Yeah it is the will of the people to pay less taxes but it also screws us. The working man run the country not the rich, not the poor , and we are worse off with the Gop in controll. In the end we are are screwed both ways.

  • @PatriotWatchUSA Show me the numbers where more soldiers have died under Obama.

  • Comment removed

  • @PatriotWatchUSA

    Obama does not I repeat does NOT control the troops, he can send them in and pull them out, his generals do everything else, his generals haven't changed. for a long time.

  • Comment removed

  • @PatriotWatchUSA

    Blaming Obama for the country's problems is living in fantasy, who do you blame for the bail outs? Obama? Bush approved them before Obama was even in office, you seem to be a tad paranoid, open your eyes and read a book, then look at that book. Not everything you read is true.

  • @PatriotWatchUSA you sound like obama personally put a bullet in each of these soldiers head. and I wonder who lives in fantasy land.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @RedMarineNex - Pay no attention to the chap from Australia. They all have opinions as well as aresholes, albeit ones which are obviously and hopelessly plugged up. This is what happens when you let the French in your country to impregnate your women

  • @MAGNETGRUNT Are you sure you replied to the right person? Without the French there would be no USoA, so I think France bashing is pretty ungrateful. But hey, you can go it alone now right? You are right and everyone else on the entire planet is wrong.

  • @RedMarineNex - YES, right person....... I AM beating up on FROGS and any other Charles de Gaulle Koolaid drinking brainwashed zombies. I remember what de Gaulle did.

  • @MAGNETGRUNT Surely you don't remember what de Gaulle did, you can't have even been born then? Unless of course you just SOUND like a 14 year old in your mom's basement.

  • @MAGNETGRUNT Now beating up on frogs is just animal cruelty.

  • @PatriotWatchUSA I love furry. it keeps me warm in the winter. chewbacca was also really furry cool.

  • Comment removed

  • @PatriotWatchUSA I'm guessing you wear either wear slip-ons, or you have velcro straps on your shoes, because tying your shoelace would be too much of an intellectual challenge. Perfect cannon fodder for the first person to exploit your frothing misplaced nationalism. Back to Fox news for you. Carry on soldier.

  • @PatriotWatchUSA Europe is going well. So is Canada. if you think Greece or France represents all of europe you are sadly misinformed. Or did you think europe was one big country?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • The market is at the same level as 1991. 

  • i hate to say, but Obama has been...a disappointment 

  • Comment removed

  • rofl this is hilarious, the way she is talking is completely sober but if you actually listen to the bullshit spewing out of her mouth its like listening to a retard

  • So, now what is your reasoning behind the plummet of the stock market in recent weeks?

  • @HokiesAndDawgs

    As of this writing the market is at 10,242 that is roughly 2,200 points higher then when Obama took office.

    I think the point of the video was that it is unfair to say that whenever the market goes up it either has nothing to do with the president or is in spite of him, but whenever the market goes down it is his fault. The economy is still vastly stronger then it was in January of 2009 and some if the credit must go to the policies enacted over the last 18 months.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @PatriotWatchUSA

    Wow. I was making a comment on the video, and about how the coverage was way off balance. What you are talking about has nothing to do with my comment. I am afraid that 500 characters is not long enough to discuss everything that is wrong with this country. Nor would I want to on a medium with no accountability. I was talking about the video, the video was talking about media coverage. Please stick to the point.

  • I love how they report this kind of stuff and how it may be Obama's fault, and then to try and sound fair, they claim it may not have any connection, but they still want to put the possibility out there. Now somebody like O'Reilly, Hannity or Beck wouldn't say there MIGHT be a connection, they would definitely say that there probably is. As supposed "straight news" anchors, these people don't want to state too much of their opinion, but they do in sort of a sneaky way. It's a clever ploy.

  • This is why an economic illiterate, liberalviewer, shouldn't speak on these matters. He honestly believes that such a small amount of fiscal stimulus could compare to the amount of monetary policy that has been enacted. A lack of proper monetary expansion caused the Great Depression which was only prolonged by further anti-business pro-isolationism enacted by the govt.

  • This angers me so much, conservatives don't really care about MSNBC, CNN, ABC bias, we just don't watch them, but liberals always have to complain about fox news bias

  • @toastertown6 I think their just explain their views more differently than yours. Their just making a difference from NEWS and ENTERTAINMENT...

  • Comment removed

  • wow shocking...fox news is biased...groundbreaking...almo­st as shocking it is to know that msnbc is just as biased.....but the other way....

    I am just curious to why fox is any worse....I am not defending fox, but they are no worse then msnbc...or really any of the major news networks...all of them have bias and to say otherwise is sheer ignorance...

  • so what?Obama is taking care of all his friends on wall street but what about the man on the street.I mean damn,nigga,day ain't no jobs out here,u know what i'm sayin'?

  • Comment removed

  • @ hewhosmokeswomen and you're a fucking asshole if you think Obama isn't a libertarian

  • @majorpayne77 umm... was that sarcasm or are you just really stupid, do you honestly think obama (very far left) is a libertarian(meaning very far right)

  • You show some graphs than!!!! And prove them wrong!!!

  • Well it should be fair but Fox News won't and will not be given credit unfortunatly. The stimulus bill that was passed helped many of Americans like my family were my mother needed he unemployment but Texas's Rick Perry need the money (also hyprcritical) and seeing a 10% increase in April taxes by the bill! Thanks!

  • @cameronsmith142 Great ...now who is going to pay it off with interest?

  • @axe863 You caught me on a good day today because I'm going to tell you and all other conservatives that getting news from one source doesn't make it true... Get it from the source, not even some of my favourite organization(s) (MSNBC, CNN, etc.) So learn the truth yourself not letting someone do it for you. By the way; I just comment and watch videos on YouTube just because its fun and another was to exercise my 1st Amendment rights. You should know that! Thanks for your opinion... Sike!

  • @cameronsmith142 There's video of him saying very radical things. How can you so easily dismiss that?

  • @axe863 Well axe863, radical can be interpreted in many different ways. For example. If the next President of the United States is a different political party; most likely they would quickly change the views and polices left in the last admin. because thats what he was voted by getting his job done as quickly as possible. Can you say thats radical? To say that he is changing from one spectrum to the next (Conservative to Liberal)? There different it looks to some that disagree as "Radical".

  • @axe863 Continuing... Look... to say that Obama is a radical is pretty grey in the fact is what you think is radical. The health care bill in my opinion (fact) is more rules not taking over. Other than that what other thing can you tell me that is "Radical"? Gay rights? War? Gun rights? (Which Obama let people have guns in national parks) Wall street reform? Oil drilling in the US? All these this are one: Conservative/Liberal policy. Two: Liberal views... Please explain your view after this....

  • @cameronsmith142 His current actions are not far left but his videos demonstrate that he is very far left. Did you actually watch the videos of him or not? Im not a conservative. Im a libertarian. I believe in free market principles and freedom for all individuals.

  • @axe863 No I'd not see that video.(Give me the exact video title) But if the video shows him have a left agenda which I personally think he needs to have on my political stance. Then let him be left but, just like you said he really isn't pushing a left wing agenda. So why do you say he currently isn't but on the video you do think he's far left? What do you belive? Video or him personally?

  • I must say at least when he makes his videos and gives an argument towards something he puts up his sources and really does who the flaws of Fox News and their bias beautifully.

  • Oh Keynesian lovers... Let the future generations pay.

  • Mmm. That there is some Grade A snark. I wish I could can some and save it for my grand kids.

  • The irony of the LiberalViewer is that the people who should be listening can't understand his long sentences.

  • Biggest success? stabilized the economy? Are you fucking kidding me? Unemployment is over 17%, and STILL going up and you think he "stabilized the economy"? What a dick!!

  • @christo930 In what country are you living in? We would be at 25% unemployment if the banks failed like the last Great Depression. Tell me how our businesses would have benefited from their accounts disappearing... even the FDIC couldn't bail them out. You can thank Obama for still having your 11% job.

  • The U6 UE is around 18% and if you calculate the UE the same way they did it in the 1930's it's at 22%. You are comparing apples to oranges because the statistics are not the same. We are now in the 3rd year of the depression, still bleeding jobs every single month and Obama has handed trillions to the banks. If you think this has been good, wait till you see the next 2 years.

  • @christo930 OK, so apparently the recession is actually almost as bad as the Great Depression... thank you banks. Again, no evidence that letting the banks fail would somehow reduce the unemployment rate.

    Sure, endless government spending is bad, but when its saving a tanking economy? You can thank Obama for applying the breaks on it, even if it wasn't graceful. The problem was the banks, not the bailout. They SHOULD own them until they pay the money back.

  • @dhinge Gov played a much larger role in this mess than you realize. It starts with the federal reserve setting prices (the price of borrowing). It was Bush that bailed out the banking system, not Obama. The thing I dislike about Obama the most is that he is too much like Bush. Letting the banks go bust would have been much better in the long and medium run and if you don't believe that I suggest you look up Japan.

  • @christo930 The Federal Reserve sucks and should go away, but they didn't cause this mess; if they did it would have happened DECADES ago, not just a few years ago. It's a total joke that we as a society support banks that are too big to fail when they are too stupid to survive.

    If the government was causing the banks to fail, we would have heard about it before even the foreclosures started happening. Nope; all we heard was FORECLOSURES UP! GAS PRICES UP! BANKS FAILING!

  • @dhinge The federal reserve set the short term interest rates which is what caused all the arms, neg ams and interest only loans and tended to drive down the long term rates as well. This was totally caused by the federal reserve setting prices for money. Savings went negative, that alone would have driven interest rates up a great deal without the fed setting rates with inflation. You can't look at the result, you have to look at the CAUSE.

  • @christo930 Do you really believe the banks were forced into arm-, neg-arm-, and interest-only loans because of the federal interest rate?! That's only a recommendation! They don't have to follow it! I need more conclusive evidence than the same old assertion I've heard over and over. The banks were not forced into making stupid loans that went against their own fundamentals.

    Hell, if they even had my money to begin with, it wouldn't have mattered if they'd failed.

  • @dhinge Why did so many people chose arms and such? BECAUSE THE SHORT TERM INTEREST RATES WERE SO LOW. None of it could have happened without the fed, none of it. The US savings rate went negative and rates were still low! THe banks made risky loans because there was a history of bailouts, from long term capital management to the S&L scandals of the early 90's. Then there was the community reinvestment act. Now look what we got, the banks are once again gambling without money, heads they win...

  • @christo930 So the government should have raised the short-term interest rates. What you're saying is the banks made risky loans because they COULD. I agree the government went too far on making a safety net for banks, but either way your argument makes it clear that the banks should have had less leniency and better regulation.

  • @dhinge The fed should have never lowered them to the level of 1% in the first place. The day before raising interest rates, Greenspan praised arm loans and said they were a good idea, then proceeded to raise the fed rate 17 times over 1.5 year period. Also, the banks didn't consider the loans risky because they were counting on housing values continuously rising, so if a guy didn't pay his mort, no big deal just sell it at it's new higher value. Anyone with a brain knew it was a bubble though.

  • wait they are consistent innability is good, doing things is bad, of course they didnt mention scott brown causing the drop!

  • More propaganda spewed from another mouthpiece for the reptile overlords!

  • The underlying assumption that Obama kept us from tipping into another depression is largely false.

    At best he has pushed it off to someone else's reign, while simultaneously making it much, much worse.

    You can't bail out banks, underwrite healthcare, expand wars, and do other expensive things on debt alone.

    You can use deficits and taxpayer dollars to do these things temporarily, but it is rather like paying your MasterCard bill with your Visa.

  • Ok, first, I dont have a problem with the existence of fox, they should be able to say whatever they like under the 1st amendment. Having said that, considering newspapers cannot cal themselves a newspaper, if they include either; a: too much editorial content and b: too much advertising material. It is fine, once again for fox to exist, but who is anyone trying to fool, saying this is a news organization? All they have is editorial, even in their supposed "hard news" segments.

  • Love your videos and I really admire the lengths you go to in order to keep debate rational and fair.

    Does anyone have a link to news elsewhere that confirms the President presided over the biggest stock market gain in a president's first year since world war II? I've been trying to find the news elsewhere but with no luck.

  • that was simply a really non-factual response on your part. The FACTS are shown by other news networks whereas FOX's ONLY agenda is a Republican one, and anything that happens BAD is of course a Libertarian (Obama) issue. Completely stupid and you sir are falling right into step with what FOX News is trying to do

  • That's nothing but a load of crap!! Fox is the ONLY network that is decidedly right leaning, while every other single one of them is left leaning, and in full praise mode of the glorious leader (Obama). By the way, just what the fuck does Obama have to do with ANY libertarian issue?? He's as far from libertarian as any other big government dickhead is, most republicans included.

    But hey, you can believe whatever asinine bullshit you want, by whatever network you choose. I don't believe none.

  • Obama's views match closer to a libertarian. Obama is a "moderate" He is NOT a liberal.

  • Obama, like almost all other politicians of today, is a corporatist, vying for more governmental intrusions into our lives for "our own good". Us libertarians tend to despise corporatism, and governmental interference into almost everything, especially our lives.

  • @hellboundmatt Hes not a moderate by any stretch of the imagination. Go to this channel "user/NakedEmperorNews". They have videos of him professing far left beliefs.

  • I don't believe none.

    and...there ain't not sumthing i wouldn't do for no 20 bucks.

    can you top a quadruple negative?

  • Ever so sorry, I attempted to write "I don't believe any of them", but ran up against the 500 word limit, which is completely non-conducive to completely coherent wording, so I re-worded it in such a way as be somewhat legible and comprehensive.

    I completely apologies, and pray you don't dispatch the internet grammar police to hunt me down and assault me in some way

  • There you have the results of being raised by an English Major. Looking at it, i should have put a haha in there, because I didn't do it maliciously, thats one of my Mom's lines when someone uses a double negative. You are right also about politician ownership. I dont go the Libertarian path, but I do admire Ron Paul's candor.

  • @majorpayne77

    You're fucking retarded if you think Obama is a Libertarian.

  • LIbertarians are republicans, you moron.

  • Damn, you really are a fucktard aren't you? Let me explain the main tenants of the parties to you very simply. Libertarians stand for the maximum amount of liberty for the people. Republicans stand for the republic, or the government, since you seem so fucking stupid. And democrats stand for democracy, which is just another way of saying mob rule. Republicans and democrats both see a need for large government, libertarians do not. Your claim that libertarians are republicans, is as stupid as you

  • amen to that

  • Total propaganda by Liberalviewer.

  • I just came across your channel and I can't tell you how much I enjoyed your thoughtful and well researched videos. Keep up the good work, I would love to see more videos of contradictions among other media outlets such as cnn, msnbc and the such

  • Thats sort of disgusting. I mean...why? It's obvious the Stimulous package worked.

  • the gain comes at the tail end of a recession

    fact 1

    the economy is only going to get better as the democrats get knocked out of the government, but only investment indicators have a "same day" response.

    fact 2

    you associating the brown election to the market when there were other bigger investment indicators simultaneously at play is foolish, just like fox associating an obama comment on the other side. (politics is only a slice of the pie)

  • Re Obama broken promises, please remember, this is a democracy. He cannot get up tomorrow and change policies overnight. It has to go thru a process. The same process that the Health Care bill is going thru. The Health Care Bill issue is not a broken promise. If it was signed into law, it would be dictatorship.

  • I think Obama handled the crashing of the stock market fairly well. However. I do not think this makes me a good leader for our country. Since you like facts so much, LiberalViewr, what promises did Obama make during his campaign that he as actually followed through on aside from a health care plan that the majority of the American people believe is too socialist for comfort?

  • Wow.... just when I think they've proven absolute zero, Fox sinks even lower.

  • @Jmage585

    Man, you Canadians sure wish you were Americans, eh?

  • @HokiesAndDawgs nope. happy to be Canadian.

  • fuck fox news

  • what can brown do for you

  • only a moron would use zimbabwe as an example of anything except what not to do

  • fox  news is so cool

  • Obama took office with a 1.3 trillion dollar budget deficit and an 8 trillion dollar projected deficit over 10 years! This year's budget has a 1.6 trillion dollar deficit and 9 trillion over ten years! That increase is due to the stimulus bill which stabilized our markets which were in cardiac arrest when he was sworn in! Obama is the most Conservative President since Bill Clinton!

  • Fox News is so dangerous....

  • The reason the economy and the stock market took a nose-dive during the bush administration was completely Obama's fault because Wall Street new Obama was going to be president five years ago. Now I see why republicans love fox news.

  • Obama IS BAD NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!1

  • Obitchyouwary couldn't out-dive two more experienced Bush-pilots when Joe Plumber was on Debate III with an IQ of TWO for a half-hour, so Granny Maddie told Bam he was Kenyan, she died, and that's all I have to say about THAT. Shoulda dumped, but he gumped past Cosby and Bel Air, which tell him to STAY HOME, and leave Star Trek to the conventioneers, but NO! We wait for Disney to roll over and invent a new cartoon, for Mr.President. Planes, copters, and cars roll over, in 2011. Got volcanoes?

  • Obama is a straw man for the Chicago Mob. His latest plan is to put tax revenues into "Small Banks" then encourage Small Business to borrow from them with interest of course. Here is how it works, The government forces business to pay taxes. Then the government loans their money back to them with interest. Who can't see thru this.

  • you got it all wrong. Obama is a front man for massive international banks. The government wants to bankrupt all small banks and business. The people behind him are not even Americans. They are international criminals. They were ofcourse behind Bush too.

  • Explain to me the reason behind destroying the strongest economy on earth. Seriously. How does anybody gain by stopping that cash flow, the lack of commerce? Money is only good as long as there is more of it.

  • Well you see, international banks own and run something called the federal reserve. They controll interest rates and can print money at will. They do not need government permission to print money. Besides, money doesn't just dissapear anyway. It's always out there. Depressions/Recessions are illusions and government orchastrated, think about it, the money has to be somewhere.

  • Blah blah blah. You do not have an answer to my question. What possible interest does any monetary firm have in destroying their best oppurtunity to make more money and assume more power. Money is power and Power is money . Neither is either if their is nobody to excercise it on.

  • I gave you a perfect answer to your question. By taking out small and individually owned banks, large corporate banks have less competition. If money is power, and the Federal Reserve can print unlimited money, they already have unlimited power. If other banks out there have money then they still have some power. By collapsing the economy they will get us to allow them to take away more of out rights, giving them more power.

  • But Money is no good without an economy in which it has value. What good is 100 trillion dollars if there is no place to use it.

  • There are always rich and powerful people even in countries like Zimbabwe where the economy reached 50 million percent. There was still very wealthy people there. In fact it is a great way to redistribute wealth and power.

  • I meant in Zimbabwe where the economy was so bad inflation reached 50 million percent.

  • Barry is a failure liberals.

  • Obama is as successful as a shadow

  • Unpopular decisions were made by Obama and seem to be working. The idea that the economy would heal itself is just plain stupid. In such a case it would have done so under the conservatives. They seem to lose sight as to who is responsible for this train wreck and criticize the White House. Of course they harp about smaller govt. so big business can continue to rape the public.

  • obama is a marxist pig

  • Obama isn't even close to marxist. Marxism is in theory good across the board. Obama is a fascist.