Added: 4 years ago
From: keyhole911
Views: 3,350
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (39)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Total Confirmation here:

    youtube.com/watch?v=fOLsM6BS2r­0

    Better quality here:

    youtube.com/watch?v=Iya_s7J7K6­Y

  • Problem: couldn't Discovery edit their audio for whatever reason?

    Not exactly sure why they'd insert explosions specifically, but what the heck...

  • Now, no need for anyone to get offended and start auguring with me, because I'm not debating what did/didn't happen. However, I've known about this footage, and seen it many many times since 2002. However, this audio along with this video only started popping up on Youtube *after* the docudrama, which edited the sound to add dramatic effects. They even added in actors voices.

  • the problem of being and entering into this "rabbit hole" is not knowing what to believe. how can one person say "oh that's not real cause this one i saw/heard at such-and-such is real, ergo you're is a fake", with this much clear media manipulation, even just a little, it almost, well does, make everything suspect (news clips of announcing wt7 collapse beforehand)that alone should make all this trivial

  • fake audio. sorry.

  • this is faked footage

    even thought i believe that the twin towers were demolished, that video has been redubbed to make it sound like a controlled demolition

    or the original was faked....?

  • What makes you think?

  • oh yeah, wouldn't the planes hitting the building and starting fires tended to ignite any explosives early and give away the whole "let's make sure the buildings come down by blowing them up because there's no way we would go to war and make billions with only 4 jet liners passengers and ten or so floors of an office buildings workers killed" theory?

  • You don't have something called critical thinking...

    And anyway, Thermate (which WAS found in the dust in iron spheres) won't ignite from a jet fuel fire, it needs a high temperature catalyst, like burning magnesium or an electric arc.

  • Actually, he does have critical thinking, what he doesn't is an utter hatred for George W Bush, The War effort, or any sense of letting it all slide and taking it up the ass from the Bin Ladens of the world, which is shamful on his part...(rolls my eyes and walks away.)

  • you cant simply scatter "thermate" in a buildings. "dr" stephen jones' "reasearch" is rather shady. i can't believe you fell for it.

  • It's from vaporizing you amazing retard. The dust went everywhere. It's not shady research, it's the only real research that's been done last time I checked. Our wonderful government illegally destroyed the wreckage, so, I don't quite see what point you have.

  • can u give credible sources for that claim?

  • it sounds like a building collapsing to me. who's to say, honestly, that that wouldn't be the sound a 110 story building makes when the air in it is being pushed down and blowing out windows on the lower levels? i mean, you can't just say for sure. it's like a UFO video, you interpret it the way you want to believe

  • No. If it was a bulding collapsing we would be hearing a lot more booms. And how can there be dust being produced and free-fall collapse at the same time? Gravity doesn't seem to be the mechanism at work here.

  • Original footage from where? It's Not the "Discovery Channel" footage, it's missing the "Watermark" the says "Discovery"

    by the way, go watch your silly September Clues debunked

    watch?v=B6jS2Ah22us

  • Are you fucking stupid? I just said I own the DVD "Inside the twin towers" this footage was in and the booms are there. and FUCKING LOUD AS HELL. Is Discovery channel a bunch of conspiracy therorists then?. Is the world this fucking dumb? Are you just gonna say I'm lying since you haven't seen it yourself? Jesus.

  • brodudesnsupras -- explain the missing the "Watermark" the says "Discovery"

    name calling shows signs of weakness and immaturity :o)

  • It also shows frustration. Nice try though. Almost sounded intellectual. Mr. Maturity....

    It doesn't say "Discovery" obviously because this wasn't ripped from the dvd. II the audio is fake, then it wouldn't be in A MAINSTREAM DOCUMENTARY. Maybe the footage, hmmm, made somewhere ELSE? You haven't watched "inside the Twin Towers"... have you?

  • brodudesnsupras -- calls me stupid... The definition of "stupid"

    brodudesnsupras smoke weed and video tapes himself doing it, posts on the internet for everyone to see... now, that gives a new meaning to "stupid"

  • It's not even me, it's my friend, you dickhead. and now YOU'VE resorted to a lame-ass tactic: finding dirt on me. classic. I knew you would do that. Pathetic.

  • You just don't have anything constructive to add anymore. It's REALLY obvious. Lets see what you have to say next...

  • And the fact remains, if you haven't even seen the documentary I'm talking about, how do you know I'm lying? You don't even know what you're arguing. It's REDICULOUS. SO go ahead and struggle to find something to discredit me with. It's entertaining to see you use those tactics instead of presenting facts, logic, or evidence... it's interesting...

  • In fact, it's the same tactics, Bill O'Reiley and Glenn Beck use. "Instead of debating the facts, HEY lets make this guy look like a jackass ON PURPOSE." Good job buddy.

    P.S. Fuck, shit, cock, dick, asshole. Please explain what words have to do with the only truth and only reality we live in. I don't control the world, I just observe it. Swearing has nothing to do with how true or false something is. Got that?

  • And now you've resorted to negatively rating my posts... because you really do have nothing left. Go ahead. You can only do it once. Like it makes a diference.

  • One last thing. You know what DOES show intelligence, or rather, a lack thereof? Typing like a 5th grader. Do you know what a period is? Holy hell. I know I make mistakes but that's just because I type too fast.

    Immature rant: complete.

  • Why doesn't the microphone 'peak' on this video, yet it 'peaks' in the original audio?

    FAKE!

  • ..ok.....let us think u are right.

    Tell me your proof about a fake audio in here!

    ...would be nice.....

    `cause this is ORIGINAL FOOTAGE ;-)

    One question: Do we have 2 fake anything ?

    It is clear an inside job,

    nevertheless if there where planes...missiles or wtf-else.....

  • Um yeah armchair... you did read my post below right? This audio is in a DISCOVERY CHANNEL NON-CONSPIRACY DVD! If the audio is fucking fake, then I guess Discovery wanted people to think there were explosives in the buildings. HAHA dipshit... It sounds WAY stronger and bassier with the DVD audio. So, sorry dude. You're completely wrong.

  • @ArmchairRevolution you are a dumbass sir. lol do some fucking research.

  • 2. "That's fake audio."

    Please, do a little research. It isn't. I have the documentary (non-conspiracy) "Inside the Twin Towers" from Discovery and the booms are loud and clear; might I add very sobering on a surround system. I've seen the other video too. I think it's very poor quality sound and the booms got cut off during conversion.

  • NOBODY FAKED IT...point!

  • actually, brodude, this is indeed fake audio. yes, i've seen the documentary you mentioned. sounds probably added in for dramatic effect. there's video from even CLOSER than the spot where this video was taken...guess what? NO EXPLOSIONS....this is fake audio sorry. :(

  • Even if that's true, does that discount every other discrepancy?

  • There are such things as different microphones, different frequency ranges, different recording equipment. And it WAS recorded on several other cameras so go fuck yourself. Brodudesnsupras is right on this one.

  • no. you're both wrong and completely retarded

  • YES explosions, there are just so many going off at once, of different explosives powers, and all the cement and crap deadening the noise, you can't hear a 'single explosion', that huge roar includes the explosions and gravity doing its work on the building, people screaming, etc. Yea the sound on this clip is fake. It sounds like a roar.

  • 1. "That's the floors pancaking!"

    Um, is it just me or wouldn't that mean like...88 booms? Please. Not to mention every time I hear a boom 10 floors are annihilated. Out the widow with that.

  • I've seen a version of this vid without the pops. I believe this one one to be fake. I do believe however that the towers were brought down intentionally using explosives.

  • How much plainer does it need to be? I mean, is this audio faked? If it's not, and that's really what it sounded like, then anyone who argues against controlled demolition needs to be put into a mental hospital and evaluated.

  • im not saying that explosions wernt used but the official explanation is that the floors where falling and stacking up and im sure theyd sound like that if they were falling on top of each other along with the rest of the building

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more