Added: 3 years ago
From: photoman4you
Views: 169
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • we're new home owners in the hills of glassell park (as of april). we've never lived anywhere in in L.A. where reception was this bad. we feel like we're back in 1996. and not only is it irritating (and sometimes embarrassing), the constant seeking for a signal really drains the phone's battery. since we're used to having mobile phone towers in range, i guess it's hard to understand why there's so much resistance to glassell park modernizing in this way.

  • I received something about this in the mail today. How do we stop this from happening? I am going to write a letter to the address indicated on the letter. Anything else Glassell Park residents can do? I have 2 children ages 20 months and 3, I am really worried about this!

  • This must be the most unattractive areas in Glassell Park.

    A fake palm tree can only help!

  • It is not the microwaves whats courses the health effects. Where the safety limit it based on. (ICNIRP) what the man is talking about 4.06.

    The study is only: The only have looked at heating.

    Now the problem is the signals on the microwaves. The modulation whats course the health effects. That is never bin study ed.

    And Motorola have let it don by George Carlo for 28,5 Million dollar.

    And Motorola keeps his mouth shut till today.

  • 50' MonoPalm.....might as well be Napalm, has about the same effect on the looks of our community. No, you cannot fight the RF issues of a cell tower, the FCC made sure of that long ago. More crap in Glassell Park.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more