This 'NSA' would go down, and alot of the people making money from the tax payers to spy on america's will be pist and all go against ron paul or loosing their job lol!
@RotationalGlobe do you have any proof? because the only proof i see, is they want nuclear energy... and even if they do acquire a nuke... why shouldnt they be able to? they are surrounded by countries with nukes being controlled by people with nukes.. maybe if we stopped occupying their land and maybe talk to them in a civilized manor, things might go a bit better.
say whaaat?? we are occupying their land? when did that happen?
they are NOT surrounded by countries with nukes, the only countries that has nukes in that area are Israel and Pakistan. Israel is NOT a threat to Iran and neither is Pakistan. The only reason they want a nuke because in their religion which is Islam it says that they must kill the jews, and the jews would go hide behind trees and shit. Iran has A LOT of oil they don't need nuclear energy. They want NUKES!
@RotationalGlobe You are beyond hope - - giving yourself away with the amendment "..and sh*t" ... USrael-/-NATo-/-Rothschild-cabal IS occupying the whole middle East - flying drones - killing scientists - employing sanctions - censoring their media - a.s.o.!
You are just another poor US-American victim of brain-wash and propaganda ... R.I.P.!
@RotationalGlobe You talk like straight from the brainwash-tube - if you were anywhere near an iraquee you would not write the Bullsh*t you do! (e.g. "their" religion -- so what´s yours?) - If you were from ANY arab country you would understand that Israhell is a threat to the whole world!
RP showed what a really great man he is. He can defend even his major opponent if they attack this guy unfairly. RP also points out why he is superior to Romney in a positive way. Many comments here point out what a shill Blitzer is. Certainly true but in this interview Blitzer is quite moderate. Because he knows that RP would take him to pieces, if he tried some crap. Hahaha!
Good for Paul in defending Romney's statement, and condemning the idiots that took Romney's words out of context. Paul and Romney are the only serious candidates.
@joepennypacker85 I just like to make you aware that monetary support for Romney comes from Wallstreet. Like they sponsored Obama. RP doesn't get a single penny from them. Just think about it.
@Packgammon I would like to remind you that there is nothing inherently wrong with getting support from Wall Street. It is only the brainwashed left that would have you think that "Wall street" and "Bank" are bad words. I honestly don't care what company or institution donates money, as long the president does his damn job.
@joepennypacker85 Basically I agree with you. But as history showed, Libya as a recent example, Wallstreet only invests into candidates who will bring them profits. Romney doesn't proclaim his neocon agenda as loud as Santorum or Gingrich but it´s there.
@Packgammon I might be terribly naive or biased, since I work at Wall Street (but no, I am not a rich banker). I am an analyst for Credit Suisse. I do not claim to be a genius, but Romney just makes a lot of sense for us analysts. We talk about it all the time. Ron Paul has some excellent ideas, but I just don't think the status quo allows for some of his idea. Maybe after a republican fixes things a bit...
@joepennypacker85 I´not an educated economist. But I can see thru: The Libyan war made great sense for bankster heads. Destroy independant structures and currency, then rebuild and integrate into IMF. Disguised by a "Humanitarian Action", Al-CIA-da fighters acting as the good Samaritan. Result 50000 innocent dead. Collateral damage, we need growth? Excellent investment strategy pushing Obama back then. Now let me guess why "Romney makes a lot of sense".
@Packgammon wow easy... you see. I was quietly expressing my opinion here, no need to get defensive. I thought I was pretty clear saying I was no banker, just a lowly analyst. You see.. this is why Ron Paul gets a bad reputation. He is no extremist, but a good amount of his supporters are, which is a shame, because Ron Paul is great.
@joepennypacker85 Did I attack you? Did I call you names? I read your posts and I´m aware that you are not Mr. Rothchild, you don´t have to repeat that you are an analyst. I am an extremist by looking behind the curtain and saying that profits by unjustified wars are immoral? I just like to remind you that your analysis is useless as long as you don´t take the war issue into account. If you feel attacked, that wasn´t my intention. Or am I only allowed to say "war is expensive"?
@Packgammon I am not defensive at all.I would have warned you about voting for Romney if you were a coal mine worker or an astronaut.Whenever companies donate large amounts you have to be wary.RP said 1000 times he won´t make war for special interest.If he would do so despite, people could call him names rightfully.Romney didn´t exclude that particularly. If he would have done that, I could trust him and then we can talk about his maybe better economy plans.Hope I explained my views.
@Packgammon I suppose he could have exclude war particularly like you say, but I just don't think politicians, even the bad ones, have an agenda to screw up the country. Other than Rick Perry, I don't think anyone would want to go to war.
@joepennypacker85 fact of the matter is that if the people have the political will then their is nothing to stop the momentum generated for the idea. If you like him like him stop with this luke warm nonesense of i like some of his idea's but will people "LET HIM" enact his policies. Do you like the message?Then get involved the message is one of self reliance freedom liberty and prosperity.Any and all other candidates want to start and maintain oppressive wars that benefit No1
Maybe Ron Paul may be a bigger Obama in the making, hiding under the mask of being oppressed -so everyone chooses him. Everyone who will become President are controlled. America will never have good Presidents, rather controlled by evil people pulling strings behind.
@MAFHHZB I can easily believe that about most candidates. But if this were a conspiracy in Paul's case, it will have to have been one that was 20 years in the making, to build his good record - hard to believe, because there are easier ways. If Paul suddenly turned after he made it to the white house, there is no way anyone could have seen it coming. Of the current crop of candidates, he easily has the fewest visible ties to special interest groups, easily the best bet.
Gingrich is the modern King Henry the 8th. Go Ron Paul!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MegaYobananaboy 2 weeks ago
So Ron Paul is a Republican after all??? I thought he was some kind of magical prophet.
martinw1200 3 weeks ago
This 'NSA' would go down, and alot of the people making money from the tax payers to spy on america's will be pist and all go against ron paul or loosing their job lol!
jasekable 1 month ago
I support Ron Paul and don't even take aspirin!
xXHoff1218Xx 1 month ago
C'mon Newt. I love Ron Paul, and I don't do drugs.....
ShaneMSnyder 1 month ago 2
Newt is evil.
TheNateJCarter 1 month ago
If Romney wins we will go to Iran and start another war.RON PAUL 2012
LisaMarie137137 1 month ago
@LisaMarie137137
if we don't go to war with Iran then they would acquire a nuke.
RotationalGlobe 1 month ago
@RotationalGlobe do you have any proof? because the only proof i see, is they want nuclear energy... and even if they do acquire a nuke... why shouldnt they be able to? they are surrounded by countries with nukes being controlled by people with nukes.. maybe if we stopped occupying their land and maybe talk to them in a civilized manor, things might go a bit better.
Fyreguy16 1 month ago
@Fyreguy16
say whaaat?? we are occupying their land? when did that happen?
they are NOT surrounded by countries with nukes, the only countries that has nukes in that area are Israel and Pakistan. Israel is NOT a threat to Iran and neither is Pakistan. The only reason they want a nuke because in their religion which is Islam it says that they must kill the jews, and the jews would go hide behind trees and shit. Iran has A LOT of oil they don't need nuclear energy. They want NUKES!
RotationalGlobe 1 month ago
@RotationalGlobe You are beyond hope - - giving yourself away with the amendment "..and sh*t" ... USrael-/-NATo-/-Rothschild-cabal IS occupying the whole middle East - flying drones - killing scientists - employing sanctions - censoring their media - a.s.o.!
You are just another poor US-American victim of brain-wash and propaganda ... R.I.P.!
miketutnix 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos 2
@miketutnix
Im actually NOT a US citizen, I am actually IRAQI.
RotationalGlobe 1 month ago
@RotationalGlobe You talk like straight from the brainwash-tube - if you were anywhere near an iraquee you would not write the Bullsh*t you do! (e.g. "their" religion -- so what´s yours?) - If you were from ANY arab country you would understand that Israhell is a threat to the whole world!
miketutnix 1 month ago
@miketutnix
lol so you are saying that I am lying to you?
I was born in baghdad.
RotationalGlobe 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SPREAD THE RON PAUL MESSAGE. THE INTERNET IS NOT ENOUGH.
START CAMPAIGNING, AND PHONE BANKS IN ALL STATES
WE WILL HAVE THE MAJORITY BY NOVEMBER IF WE WORK HARD!
THUMBS UP AND SHARE!!!!!
bierat1610 1 month ago
RP showed what a really great man he is. He can defend even his major opponent if they attack this guy unfairly. RP also points out why he is superior to Romney in a positive way. Many comments here point out what a shill Blitzer is. Certainly true but in this interview Blitzer is quite moderate. Because he knows that RP would take him to pieces, if he tried some crap. Hahaha!
Packgammon 1 month ago
Good for Paul in defending Romney's statement, and condemning the idiots that took Romney's words out of context. Paul and Romney are the only serious candidates.
joepennypacker85 1 month ago
@joepennypacker85 I just like to make you aware that monetary support for Romney comes from Wallstreet. Like they sponsored Obama. RP doesn't get a single penny from them. Just think about it.
Packgammon 1 month ago
@Packgammon I would like to remind you that there is nothing inherently wrong with getting support from Wall Street. It is only the brainwashed left that would have you think that "Wall street" and "Bank" are bad words. I honestly don't care what company or institution donates money, as long the president does his damn job.
joepennypacker85 1 month ago
@joepennypacker85 Basically I agree with you. But as history showed, Libya as a recent example, Wallstreet only invests into candidates who will bring them profits. Romney doesn't proclaim his neocon agenda as loud as Santorum or Gingrich but it´s there.
Packgammon 1 month ago
@Packgammon I might be terribly naive or biased, since I work at Wall Street (but no, I am not a rich banker). I am an analyst for Credit Suisse. I do not claim to be a genius, but Romney just makes a lot of sense for us analysts. We talk about it all the time. Ron Paul has some excellent ideas, but I just don't think the status quo allows for some of his idea. Maybe after a republican fixes things a bit...
joepennypacker85 1 month ago
@joepennypacker85 I´not an educated economist. But I can see thru: The Libyan war made great sense for bankster heads. Destroy independant structures and currency, then rebuild and integrate into IMF. Disguised by a "Humanitarian Action", Al-CIA-da fighters acting as the good Samaritan. Result 50000 innocent dead. Collateral damage, we need growth? Excellent investment strategy pushing Obama back then. Now let me guess why "Romney makes a lot of sense".
Packgammon 1 month ago
@Packgammon wow easy... you see. I was quietly expressing my opinion here, no need to get defensive. I thought I was pretty clear saying I was no banker, just a lowly analyst. You see.. this is why Ron Paul gets a bad reputation. He is no extremist, but a good amount of his supporters are, which is a shame, because Ron Paul is great.
joepennypacker85 1 month ago
@joepennypacker85 Did I attack you? Did I call you names? I read your posts and I´m aware that you are not Mr. Rothchild, you don´t have to repeat that you are an analyst. I am an extremist by looking behind the curtain and saying that profits by unjustified wars are immoral? I just like to remind you that your analysis is useless as long as you don´t take the war issue into account. If you feel attacked, that wasn´t my intention. Or am I only allowed to say "war is expensive"?
Packgammon 1 month ago
@Packgammon I am not defensive at all.I would have warned you about voting for Romney if you were a coal mine worker or an astronaut.Whenever companies donate large amounts you have to be wary.RP said 1000 times he won´t make war for special interest.If he would do so despite, people could call him names rightfully.Romney didn´t exclude that particularly. If he would have done that, I could trust him and then we can talk about his maybe better economy plans.Hope I explained my views.
Packgammon 1 month ago
@Packgammon I suppose he could have exclude war particularly like you say, but I just don't think politicians, even the bad ones, have an agenda to screw up the country. Other than Rick Perry, I don't think anyone would want to go to war.
joepennypacker85 1 month ago
@joepennypacker85 Please watch:
Ron Paul=Peace Obama=War - American killing machine
Is this ok for you?
and this
Doug Wead: Ron Paul Is in It to Win It
Funny, 10 min after we were communicating last time, I saw this video in which Doug Wead is exactely saying what I said, regarding: Follow the money.
Packgammon 1 month ago
@joepennypacker85 fact of the matter is that if the people have the political will then their is nothing to stop the momentum generated for the idea. If you like him like him stop with this luke warm nonesense of i like some of his idea's but will people "LET HIM" enact his policies. Do you like the message?Then get involved the message is one of self reliance freedom liberty and prosperity.Any and all other candidates want to start and maintain oppressive wars that benefit No1
KevinSheerin 1 month ago
atheist for ron paul
a10fjet 1 month ago
Maybe Ron Paul may be a bigger Obama in the making, hiding under the mask of being oppressed -so everyone chooses him. Everyone who will become President are controlled. America will never have good Presidents, rather controlled by evil people pulling strings behind.
MAFHHZB 1 month ago
@MAFHHZB I can easily believe that about most candidates. But if this were a conspiracy in Paul's case, it will have to have been one that was 20 years in the making, to build his good record - hard to believe, because there are easier ways. If Paul suddenly turned after he made it to the white house, there is no way anyone could have seen it coming. Of the current crop of candidates, he easily has the fewest visible ties to special interest groups, easily the best bet.
Shanockdotcom 1 month ago
AIPAC public relations man posing as a journalist. Blitzer disgusts me.
MetaMetaphysician 1 month ago
Ron Paul once again proves why he's the best candidate for presidency.
Ron Paul 2012
Tha5thElement 1 month ago
Fuck CNN, mitt and newt.
thedynamix 1 month ago
newt gingrich??? do not be swayed by the sweet siren song of the silver haired serpent
Ron Paul 2012
holidayhouse03 1 month ago 16
@holidayhouse03 Wait... he sings? O:
Espionok 1 month ago
RON PAUL 2012! Still strong!
PeoplebfGov 1 month ago 12
Please excuse my language. Im kinda disappointed with the NH primary turnout.
PeoplebfGov 1 month ago
shut up CNN, your bias media is no better than Mitt's and Newt's bullcrap spewing out of their buttholes.
PeoplebfGov 1 month ago