@lrdvader123 They can leave anytime they want. It's a public event to reach many people who want to stop and listen. Tell me this: If you saw a man crossing the street about to be hit by a car, but you could save him by pushing him out of the way, would you do so? Or would you think "I know he's about to be hit by that car, but pushing is mean, so I'll just wait and see what happens"? Of course you'd push them out of the way! No one's being forced to talk publicly with Ray.
@GeekingForJesus I could say the same thing and start yelling in the microphone that people should do drugs. People aren't being forced to listen to me right? It's not a crime right? (yes it is, and If I did that i would go to jail)
@oreowizard1 Would it be illegal? If you were stating a case on WHY people should be allowed to use illegal drugs, it wouldn't be illegal. If you were yelling on the streets trying to convince people to do something illegal, then it would be illegal. Since the Bible isn't illegal in the United States of America, Ray isn't breaking the law.
@GeekingForJesus I never said he's breaking the law? but that doesn't mean he should be able to continue and annoy people in the streets. Bibles are available in MANY places, churches are everywhere. If people want to try out a religion, they can do so anytime they want. The idea that you suggest something and not take responsibility for it is ridiculous. (just because people have the ability to ignore it?)
@AntiMatterWave Based off of that, you're not a good person because a sin is a sin. A lie is a lie, lust is lust, and even getting free music online is stealing. If you died today and you have not accepted Jesus' sacrifice, you would go to Hell.
@branchbros Actually I am a good person, however I am a sinful person. Being bad is not synonymous with being sinful, which is the point I was making, also how am I supposed to accept it if I don't even believe it happenned?
@AntiMatterWave Actually that's exactly what it means; sinful is being against God, and if your doing things against God, than that means you're an enemy of God. You're a liar, blasphemer, and adulterer based on what you said, so, I wpuld call you a bad person. Romans says that "there is none righteous, no not one". And even if you don't believe in Him, that doesn't change the fact that he is going to judge you according tgo your sins.
@branchbros You're still not getting what I'm saying, I'm saying that even though I'd be considerred an enemy of god, I'm still not a bad person because the things that would make god consider me an enemy are not things that would make me bad. I'm saying that god's moral compass is flawed
@AntiMatterWave Okay, well, based on what you told me, you're a liar, blasphemer, and adulterer. Would you call a liar a good person? If you would, than I would say that YOUR moral compass is flawed. And if God's moral compass is flawed, where do we get our morals from? (Serious question, I want to know what you believe)
@branchbros there's nothing inherently bad about lying, it depends on the lie. I believe that we examine a given situation and assess the pros and cons of a given course of action. if the pros outweigh the cons then go for it, if not then don't. the reason we can't all get our morals from the same place is that different people have different morals, some don't care about others some do, some judge the same factors differently, god doesnt so he cant be the source of morallity
@AntiMatterWave Very interesting points. But lying inherently is wrong; it's the severity of the lie that humanity can deem as harmful or not. And do remember: God is the source of good and bad, but he has also given us the gift/curse of free will. That decision can be made to ignore right and do wrong and can also influence others to do wrong as well. If God is not the source of good and bad, where does it come from?
@branchbros Right and wrong are subjective which makes it impossible for something that does not implicitly cause harm to be inherently wrong. Something can however be objectively good or bad depending on whether it causes harm, whether something is good or bad is not decided by sentience but by effect, if bad things happen as a result then it is bad but if more good things happen than bad then it is right (different than good which means only good things happen implicitly)
@AntiMatterWave But who gets to define what is good and bad? If it's up to the individual, then rape and child porn is acceptable to someone who believes in it. And if I were to say that you comments are physically and emotionally hurting me (they're not by the way, I love discussions like this) could your comments be deleted because they are causing me pain?
@branchbros Like I said, good is when only something positive happens, bad is when something negative happens (e.g. killing someone) but bad can be right (e.g. if someone killed Stalin before he got to power) if it is the lesser of two evils. Things like rape are in a different ball park because rapists know that what they're doing is bad and wrong but they just don't care about the effects on others. good and bad are defined by effect, not a thinking mind
@AntiMatterWave But who gets to decide what's positive and what is negative? You answering my question the same way. If I shoot the president because his policies are "ruining America," according to you, it would be acceptable because the country would be better off and the pro's outweigh the cons, correct or false?
@branchbros America can be ruined to a variety of degrees, if it's just something like putting America through a financial crisis then no I don't agree but if he was being a complete fascist dictator, killing anyone who was different than what he thought was perfect regardless of what they'd done along with anyone who didn't agree with him then yes I'd agree. How positive or negative something is is to do with how much suffering it causes, not what someone chooses is positive
@AntiMatterWave But to me, the pros outweigh the cons and it would be acceptable to kill a president hypothetically, because His policies are causing the suffering of the people, e.g., an executive order that says all whites must pay a tax. If I thought that way, who are you to tell me I'm wrong?
@branchbros I can tell you that the suffering caused by his policies does not outweigh the suffering caused by his death, were that not the case then I would agree with you, however the reason that people have different moral views is because they percieve these things differently, all I can really say is that I don't agree with you or that I do, neither of us can actually be right
@branchbros No, if the pros of killing the president outweigh the cons of killing the president then you are right, it's not about if you agree with your thinking, it's about what the effects are since that's the only kind of measurement that doesn't rely on oppinion but fact, what happens as a result is a fact, whether your thinking is right is oppinion
@AntiMatterWave But that's what I'm saying. If I believe the pros of "saving American families from bad policies that destroy their lives and render them poor," outweigh the cons of killing a president, going to jail and providing grief for his family and supporters, am I doing something good?
@branchbros You're clearly an intelligent person, I'll give you that. Really all anyone can do is assert their belief about it, you think you are, I disagree. I will however say that you aren't evil because to me someone is only evil if they know that what they're doing is wrong but do it anyway, in this case you would think that what you are doing is right
@AntiMatterWave Much obliged for the compliment, I can tell you have given this subject careful thought as well. But John Wilkes Booth seriously thought that his plan to assassinate Abraham Lincoln was the right thing to do. Is the man who shot and killed the 16th president in cold blood not evil? Hitler thought the Holocaust was a righteous endeavour as well. Are these men evil or not?
@branchbros I believe that what they did was wrong and in the case of Hitler it was extremelyt wrong but I don't say that they were evil. To me, to claim that someone is evil is synonymous with claiming that they knew what they were doing was wrong, Hitler didn't so he wasn't evil but he was very, very, very wrong
@branchbros Nope, that student didn't cause any harm, I therefore don't think that telling that lie was immoral and therefore cannot be evil. I'd say that evil is a view on intention as well as effect, not just intention
@AntiMatterWave Well, if we use that logic, a failed terorist attack on New York doesn't make the terrorist evil because, although his intentions were bad, nothing "bad" happens. And do you think the teacher thinks that lying about grades does no harm? Or the overly involved parents? You can't subjectify good and evil because then they both disappear.
@branchbros You absolutely can subjectify good and evil. The failed terrorist is evil because of his intention to do a bad thing if he knew he was doing the wrong thing. The event itself was not bad because nothing hapenned. You are however trying to get me to objectify a subjective rule, that's completely illogical, I can't give you a formula for evil when the formula would be variable. They can be subjectified because they are subjective
@AntiMatterWave But then by what you are saying, someone who looks at child porn is not necessarily doing something wrong, or, again, someone who commits a murder is not necessarily doing something wrong. Good and evil cannot be subjective because then what's good and evil for you doesn't mean that someone who believes the opposite isn't wrong. Where's the logic in that?
@branchbros Which completely explains the variation in moral codes between people, law was made as an objective idea of right and wrong, it never worked, if there was some kind of objective morallity then why is there so much variation. With regard to child porn, they aren't actually doing anything wrong until they express that urge by molesting a child, but I find it sick that anyone would want to, just like someone who WANTS to kill someone but doesn't isn't doing anything wrong.
@AntiMatterWave No, my question has been from the beginning, who gets to decide what good and bad is? There is so much variation because, as I've said before, the choice to ignore morality can be passed on from person to person because we are like sheep. So, is child porn acceptable or unacceptable? According to your comment, it's not necessarily wrong...same with the intent to murder apparently. And how have laws never worked?
@branchbros The maing of child porn is wrong, the viewing of it is sick, laws don't work because not everyone has the same morral code, no-one decides, if there was someone to decide we would have no variation, choosing to ignore morallity causes variation in behaviour, not in oppinions about what is wrong, there is no way to choose what to find right and wrong, if god decided we'd all have the samemoral codes but we don't because there's no objective basis
@AntiMatterWave I'm not saying that laws decide what is right and wrong, after all Hitler followed the laws during WWII. Think of it this way: God sets the standard, but I, being a sinner, ignore that standard and come up with my own standard that suits me. That's why people have "varying" morals. If it were subjective, good and evil would not exist because they would change from person to person. Without God in the Bible, you can't define good and evil.
@branchbros No, because you choose to ignore the standard you have varying behaviour, you haven't chosen what to find right or wrong so that doesn't explain varying morals, the lack of an objective standard, however, does. And about law not dictating right and wrong, that's exactly what I was saying about it not working.
@AntiMatterWave And I agree that laws are not objective. And if you ignore the standard and decide that lying in certain situations is acceptable, are you not creating for yourself your own guidelines for living? You've decided what you feel is right and wrong, and your behavior reflects that. "Varying behavior" has nothing to do with this. And, again, if there is no objective standard, then there is no wrong. What say you?
@branchbros When I hear someone lie I don't choose whether to think it's ok, I simply asses what harm it does and what good it does, I can't choose to think that it was wrong if I already think it's right, I can pretend that I think it's wrong but I don't really, if god gave me an objective idea of right and wrong then I wouldn't ever feel that a lie is right, I don't choose to or I'd just choose morals that siut me, like I'd choose to be ok with theft, but I'm not
@AntiMatterWave God sets the standard but also gifts us with free will to reject or accept that standard. And you say you measure something by the harm it does, well who decides what harm is if it is subjective? Harm is doing wrong to others, but if right and wrong are subjective, then harm is subjective as well. Therefore, if I believed child porn was acceptable, I can look at your young daughter naked and desire her sexually but not be doing anything wrong.
@branchbros That's my point, no-one has set the standard because there is no standard which is why people have varying morals and moral debates and conflicts. If you believe that you can choose what to find right and wrong then prove it to yourself by choosing to find murder objectively acceptable, just for a while, you can change back later, after all it's your choice according to you
@AntiMatterWave You're right to the point that no person has or can set a standard of right and wrong. But why would you change back if you think that it's wrong? Are you saying now that there IS a standard but not one at the same time? If right and wrong is subjective, then, once again, I can come to your house, steal your valuables, kidnap your child and use them as a sex slave, and not be wrong in my actions because I believe I'm in the right. Do you see how illogical that is?
@branchbros Are you now saying that you can choose what to find wrong but you can't choose what to find it wrong to choose to find wrong because they fall into the same category. You didn't choose to find murder wrong did you? You find it wrong because it does more harm than good. Right and wrong are subjective to culture as well as people and effect (e.g. If you define paedophlia as sex with an under 18 year old then in antiquity pretty much everyone was a paedophile)
@AntiMatterWave So wait, are you saying now that culture and society gets to define what is right and wrong? And can I have your address? Since you didn't answer my last point, I figure I can just come by and take all your things and do whatever I think is right inside your house.
@branchbros I specifically said "Right and wrong are subjective to culture as well as people and effect" The idea that it's ok to do whatever you want as long as you're cool with it isn't one I endorsed, if it were to get to such extremes as people being allowed to kill because it's just another action and so you just might find it ok the same way as you might find abortion ok then I would change what I'm saying. And yes, my address is 42 Minster Crescent Darwen Lancs. England
Ray, you know you are doing more harm than good right? People who are already Christians will think you are doing a good job, but to a non-believer's point of view, you are simply making Christians look even more stupid and annoying than we already appear to be. Stop air-preaching!
@McHenryShawn73 oh he gets their attention alright, but in a negative way. Just look at the responses from the people: majority of them are disgusted and walk away. Sure, maybe 1% of the people will be interested, but majority end up being even further from Christ than before.
@marek0086 Ray is good only if you are a believer to begin with. He is passionate, speaks very clear, and in a way easy to understand. And he does seem like a good man. But when preaching to non-believers, he isn't the best person for the job. IMO he ends up driving them more away from Christ than towards. I have seen better pastors who are able to get non-believers more interested in Christianity.
Some men are powerless to believe God and nothing you say will make a difference. Ozbviously the young lady has no power to believe so to urge her about death and judgment is futile. Discernment realizes by good doctrine you cannot make a believer
@Mahmood42978 Hi. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on "evangelistic sociopaths." What do you think Christians should do? If you choose to answer, please remind me of what the issue is! Thanks!
I'd humor this guy with his god-based perception but now he's just spewing nonsense with "eternity". No one can claim to even understand eternity, yet these religious fucks claim they can KNOW eternity with their unproven and unjustifiable god. If they believe they will live forever because of their belief in a god, then who am i to burst their bubble. They will die, just like all of you and become rotting flesh.
The only thing missing is the demonstration of the Holy Ghost in POWER, other than that, PRAISE GOD I LOVE THIS!!!!!! The message of Salvation will never wear out.
@TerraformerOfLight The power of God is in the preaching of the Word! The greatest miracle is for a sinner to be converted. Can you show us an example of this "missing demonstration of the Holy Ghost" He spoke with boldness in the midst of sinners...is this something you practice?
@TheRegulator1984 Hi bro, The power of God is NOT ONLY the preaching of the word, but the DEMOSTRATION of the word;
Luke 9:2 And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick.
Romans 15:19 Through mighty signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of God; so that from Jerusalem, and round about unto Illyricum, I have fully preached the gospel of Christ.
SO I AGREE!!!! It IS in demonstration of the Holy Ghost, but not the FULL demonstration. I personally do BOTH.
@TheRegulator1984, I HAVE TO practice the preaching of the Gospel in the midst of sinners, there is no other way to do it, and they don't always like to hear me, but as soon as someone gets healed by the power of God, oh how quickly they become interested in what you have to say, that what healing/deliverance and or miracle is to an unbeliever, it is a sign! Like Jesus said, Mark 16:17 and these signs shall follow them that believe in my name they shall... They are a sign that points to Jesus!
@TerraformerOfLight I'd like to see one of your videos of you healing folks in the street....you ever heard of Justin Peters? Look him up on youtube he exposes all these fakes. Copland, Duplantis, Hinn and others.
@TheRegulator1984. some will be coming soon, but not because you asked about it, but because Jesus Christ and His precious Gospel needs to saturate this planet completely, and I will be a part of that by any means, I have to be!
@TheRegulator1984 Who cares, leave it up to God, pray for the pope and pray for Benny Hinn and stop the pointing of the finger. Brother, that;s not your job! YOU PREACH THE GOSPEL, HEAL THE SICK, CAST OUT DEVILS, RAISE THE DEAD, SAVE SOULS, THAT IS YOUR JOB SO DON'T WASTE TIME POINTING THE FINGER AT ANYONE ELSE BUT YOURSELF, I CHALLENGE YOU IN THE HOLY GHOST!!!!! GET BUSY WITH THE FATHER'S BUSINESS, let your fruit in His Kingdom speak for you, because you will have to answer for EVERY idle word!
@TerraformerOfLight Have you ever raised the dead? And God tell's us to expose darkness eph 5:11. If someone isn't preaching sound doctrine and has been caught in many scandals, we should warn the Body of a wolf in the midst...and that's exactly what Benny is. Your probably about to say what every charismatic says "Don't speak against God's anointed" but he is not God's. Judge him by his fruit! Not these so called signs, even the devil does that, but he can't bear fruit of righteousness.
@TerraformerOfLight Never mind I just saw your channel...you know Kathryn Kuhlman was a master psychic and hypnotist chosen by the Catholic Church to bring in the signs and wonders movement. Benny Hinn even admits to using hypnotism. I was deceived by this movement for about 6yrs of my walk. Until God showed me the true light. This movement comes straight from the Kaballah. Satan is slick, he doesn't come to us in a red suit with a pitch fork...he comes to us dressed like Benny Hinn.
@TheRegulator1984, Who told you that! Do you think the devil is called the accuser of the brethren for no reason? Did you hear Khulman herself say that? Or did you hear Benny Hinn himself say that? Or did you HEAR SAY? Was it some website made to discredit men and women of God, beware lest you get deceived brother. I've been to a Benny Hin meeting, and more than once, I don't agree with ALL the entirety of what he teaches BUT, HE IS OF GOD and GOD IS WITH HIM, make no mistake, he is my brother.
@TerraformerOfLight Yes, Benny has admitted to using hypnotism. I've also been to one of his crusades. And of course Khuman wouldn't say that. I was raised up in this stuff and even practiced it for a few years... 99% of it is man, and mysticism. Look into the nature of the Kaballah and how it is the same as the charismatic movement. I believe in the supernatural power of God, but not people like Benny and others associated with him.
@TerraformerOfLight Look this up on youtube. "Exposing Word of Faith Prosperity Gospel:Justin Peters"
Can you show us in the bible things like being "slain in the spirit" "holy laughter" people barking like dogs, running around speaking in tongues, and the "little god" theology that makes man look like God and God look like a man?
She obviously doesn't speak english fluently or extremely well, and Ray's accent doesn't really help. She probably doesn't understand most of what he's saying (not an insult, learning a language is indeed difficult).
Can you prove that he didn't Zeus DIDN'T rise from the dead or that JESUS did?
because you have a book and i have a book so which book is right. my book has prophecies that have come true. Zeus created everything you see before you he is the genesis and the singularity he is resplendent and holy you have hardened your heart against him he's the one and only god and if you don't come to him punishment will be vile and eternal in Hades
@FlyingSpahghettiMan : I don't know what she has heard before, because the actual recording of what she was told isn't recorded...or even on ty. But I do know this,according to This one particular vid,she has at least heard the gospel one time. Thanks for responding!
@FlyingSpahghettiMan : If you don't know what was said by the other missionaries(Korean and Japanese) or even remember...why are you 'sweating' me by telling me to listen?? The madness of atheism.....complete madness.....
How did Ray go from ''something created everything'' (which I personnally don't believe) ...to the Bible is the inerrant word of this ''something''? What a douchebag! ...and duping people into listening to you by throwing out free money and posing as an IQ examiner is a big big lie. The Korean girl was exceptionnally honest making her far more moral! Ray Comfort: You are a deceitful, obnoxius man whi knows absolutely nothing other than how to badger people... Your disgusting!
@Leadman1989 Scared of being held accountable for every sin you've ever committed? Including those done in the flesh and in the mind? Can't run, can't hide, God sees everything. Repent and accept Jesus into your heart while you still can.
Scared of being held accountable for every sin you've ever committed? Including those done in the flesh and in the mind? Can't run, can't hide, Jupiter sees everything. Repent and accept Apollo into your heart while you still can
i bet you're trembling in your boots... you're not -- i guess it's because you DO NOT BELIEVE in those gods RIGHT? why do you expect me to accept yours without an EVIDENCE?
@Leadman1989 Over 5000 Greek manuscripts for the life of Jesus. 24'000 for the New Testament, and over 800'000 biblical artifacts. Jesus was a historical person, His life was well documented. You either trust in Him or you don't. I know I do.
@donovanrules123123 No. Not one eye witness account. No artifacts of his life. Nazareth didn't even exist till after the SECOND century. watch?v=WSzQC1zKesU
His life is a void. There is nothing demonstrable and nothing solid. In fact the lack of evidence is just shocking.
@donovanrules123123 Sorry. Not one of those are EYE witnesses. Josephus is a well documented FORGERY. The Talmud was written in the 5th century and it's authors didn't believe in jesus. Tacitus wasn't an eye witness born decades after the supposed crucifixion as was Pliny, Lucian, Celsus, Suetonius, Mara bar Sarapion. Thallus never mentions jesus. Acts of Pilate is a FOURTH century document.
In short, you have ZIP and my claim stands. Time for you to pull YOUR head out of your ass.
@jwissick If you reject Jesus than you may as well reject Lucretius, Pliny, Plato, Caesar, Tacitus, Aristotle, and so on. Seeing as the New Testament is the most well supported document in the history of man. 5600 manuscripts with an accuracy of 99.5%, written less than 100 years afer. While there are only 7 for Plato (1200 yrs), 10 for Caesar (1000 yrs), and 49 for Aristotle (1400 yrs).
@donovanrules123123 show me an artifact of moses or Jesus or Noah or any of the apostles. Show me a roman record of the dead who rose after the crucifixion. Show me roman accounts of the miracles of jesus.
if they were claiming to walk on water instead of revealing mathematical truths then i would reject them... but what they claim is completely with in the realm of possibility
im impressed you either went to some RELIGIOUS website or completely made up those stats JUST for me? im flattered
Hitler was a real person you either trust him or you don't... the god of the bible IF real endorses MURDER, SLAVERY, RAPE, GENOCIDE, INFANTICIDE, ABORTION, and ANIMAL ABUSE
now why would i trust THAT? oh and could you provide your sources?
“Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”
Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[a] This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b] All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” [MATTHEW 22:36-40]
Get some of Lee Strobel's books as he talks about Jesus. Strobel was an atheist who researched the evidence for Jesus.
what makes you think i don't know about or haven't read lee strobel's work... to be quite frank with you some of the MIND NUMBINGLY IGNORANT things he says about atheism makes me doubt he was ever one
bible quotes are worthless... jesus could have existed (i don't believe he did) but he wasn't the son of god NO EVIDENCE
unprepared college students? yeah that's not gonna cut it
@donovanrules123123 (cont) If we want to put functional spirituality and human reciprocity values religious prophets taught, it is up to us. What our ancestors considered 'real' is outmoded. The use of the Scientific Method and our understanding of nature, is the true and intelligent way for social concern. That is the tool for this functional spirituality; but societies reject it.
Not to mention there are documents supporting every god that ever existed some more closely than jesus... who doesn't even have an original story it's copied from several other deities that came before him
@Leadman1989 The difference is that those other god/s aren't historical people. Jesus, however, is. Again, read Lee Strobel's books. Their cheap and easy to read. Also, you can type into youtube "give me an answer" and watch some of the videos with Cliffe debating college students. Great stuff, seriously.
have YOU read any of the arguments against jesus? my guess is no my guess is you've only read the supporting arguments that means you aren't fully informed but INDOCTRINATED i'll read and watch that stuff "more of it anyway" when you read the arguments that are against your dogma
@Leadman1989 Yeah, the bible is one document that supports those gods. And some of those gods are no more than men, playing god. Or I mean acting like a god, even as God has said, "you are god's" (sarcastically).
Stop pontiff to your religious lip service and the endless saviours that discuss values for humanity. There are those continually opinionated opinions about who we are, and our origination; that is unimportant for the most concerning issue is the society here and now. (cont)
(cont) Society is terribly suffering from unsustainable monetary systems, economics, and devalued culture. So worrying whether a 'divine being' composed the universe, or biological organisms, gas explosions, and evolution are indeed meaningless. These do not change the problems we have now. We cannot let some imaginative revelation divide and guide us to a correct direction. The human species is very capable of changing. (cont)
@jwissick And yet, this so called "tyrant" came down to earth 2000 years ago and bled and suffered on a cross so that you may be forgiven and have eternal life. If it wasn't for this "tyrant" then humanity would have no hope....everyone would be condemned to hell because NO ONE is good. God by definition cannot be a tyrant because He looks out for YOUR interests. All the laws He made (many which u have broken), are there to guide you to having a better life. Repent and accept Jesus today!
@donovanrules123123 No, he didn't. There is no evidence outside the bible (which contains virtually no accurate historical data) that your jesus even existed. There are no contemporary documents that even hold his name let alone record a single miracle or even the name of his disciples. Not even Paul recorded any of jesus's miracles. There are no eye witness accounts. The bible is as much proof for jesus as Harry Potter is proof of wizards.
@mattandpatti222 Paul, aka Saul was chosen by Jesus to be an apostle, If Jesus knew he was gonna teach lies then he would've not been chosen. Right now the only anti-christ I can think of is YOU
I love Ray Comfort, hes awesome, he has guts to stand in public and preach the Gospel to random people. surely Ray Comfort is the reincarnation of the apostle Paul.
@jonathanfater There is no such thing as reincarnation. Just like the misconception that some people have that once a person dies, they become an angel.
HEBREWS 9:27 (NIV) - "27 Just as people are destined to die once, and after that to face judgment,"
I meant scientific because it kind of follows logic that if someone DOES believe in reincarnation that they wouldn't or most likely NOT believe in the bible do you have any EXTRA-BIBLICAL evidence? not to mention you still have to prove that it's an ACCURATE and CREDITABLE source
@Leadman1989 What type of scientific proof are you looking for? Because as for me, I never needed any proof except from the Bible. I never looked anywhere outside of the Bible. So, if you are looking for me to give you scientific proof, can't help you there. I don't believe in science to show me the facts about what the Bible already says. I have Faith that it is true. Be Blessed!!
There's no evidence that reincarnation is real zero the same about of evidence exist for there being a god but that doesn't stop you from dismissing one and excepting the other for which there is also no evidence you and the people that believe in reincarnation scientology and unicorns are on the same playing field - if you don't believe/trust science unplug your computer take of your clothes and go live in the forest nice and safe from science
@Leadman1989 I DON'T believe in reincarnation, scientology or unicorns, along with quite a few other things. So, not sure why you are lumping me in that group. There is no evidence that reincarnation exist, unless you know of someone who died and came back as someone/something else. Lets see your proof that it does exist.
Why would I trust science, it is always changing. God's Word never does. In my prayers. Be Blessed!!
I DON'T believe in reincarnation either and you may not but you do believe in OTHER things for which there is no evidence... which was my point
I trust in science because it corrects itself and seeks the truth... since when is being hard-headed and refusing to change with new evidence a GOOD thing?
and if you don't trust science then like i said why don't you give up your HOUSE your CAR your TELEVISION your CLOTHES and just about everything SURROUNDING YOU!!!
@Leadman1989 What evidence are you looking for? What OTHER things are you referring to that I am suppose to be believing in? As far as science goes, it has many definitions. It depends on what you are applying it to. I don't believe in the science that tries so hard to disprove the Bible. If you feel the need to call me hard-headed because I believe in the one true God and the Bible (His Word), then so be it. If it were not for God, I would not have what I have!!
im pointing out that you're a hypocrite ridiculing the beliefs of others while your beliefs ARE JUST AS LAUGHABLE
NO you redefine science to fit your misconstrued world view... your god violates all branches of science what you're implying is a WORLD WIDE conspiracy of scientist that just HATE god for some unknown reason and want to hide all evidence of him behind science that APPEARS to work and describe nature in every conceivable way
@Leadman1989 Quite frankly I am not sure what you expected to gain by name calling and judging someone when you don't know them. You asked a question about Reincarnation. I answered it, you agreed that you don't believe in it either. So not sure why you keep going to more stuff. If you want to debate something, you picked the wrong person. Either you believe in the one true God & the Bible or you don't. Debating someone who believes will not change either of ours minds. In my prayers!!
don't worry i know you're immune to logic and reason you've been brainwashed well enough if you were born in the middle east you would be telling me how allah is the one TRUE god if you were born in nordic times you would be telling me how thor is the one TRUE GOD it's not new but hopefully with better education and more openness of information (internet) people will become less superstitious and less willing to believe unproven unfounded CRAP
@Leadman1989 Did you know Christianity started in the Middle East? There is only one true God, and if you had an open mind and an openheart, you would see this. Only those who actually are free thinkers can come to God, but those who have succombed to the modern day theories of evolution and universalism have a hard time accepting anything new. And by the way, he is not calling anyone names or judging them. He is letting them admit to their own sins not him accusing them.
all ABRAHAMIC religions started in the middle east... now what about the THOUSANDS of other purported gods and 100s upon 100s of religions? what about the gods that came before jesus with virtually the SAME life stories and claims? you mean they are skeptics just accepting something for no good reason is stupid all of the science that i accept has evidence to back it up you calling me closed minded is the most ass backward thing i think has ever happened you don't even know me
@Leadman1989 The gods as you say before Jesus were men, He was before them all. He alway's existed, even before He came to earth. Man has alway's made himself to be like God. Even today, God said you are god's. In the Psalms.
you are so hopelessly deluded... if the GODS before JESUS were men then why do you believe that JESUS wasn't? could it be that you were raised to believe that he wasn't when he actually was or more likely DIDN'T EXIST AT ALL?
@Leadman1989 I do believe Jesus is God. He didn't make Himself to be God, He The God. He alway's was and is. He existed before them. As He said in John 8, "Before Abraham was, "I AM". Here's the greek word for I AM, imee. first person singular presumed indicative; a prolonged form of a primary and defective verb; I exist (used only when emphatic) :- am, have been, × it is I, was. —Strong's Talking Greek & Hebrew Dictionary
@Leadman1989 Obama is real because he lives in the white house, because I see him in there. Yeah, that's circular reasoning and I will stick with it. Sounds good to me. :)
and what makes jesus any differen't? how do you know he wasn't A MAN acting like a god?...
no no no that's not circular reasoning that's called DEMONSTERABLY VERIFIABLE you can GO to the white house and TOUCH him it's called EVIDENCE.. you see him be cause he's real he's real becuase all of your senses give you information (sight touch sound) as proof of his existence and 3rd party verification i can see him too there for it is reasonable to come to the conclusion that he exist
@LovesSockMonkey As Ray has said in several of his commentaries, a man( or woman) with an experience is not at the mercy of a man with an argument. It takes an experience to know it is true. No experience? Can't really be sure. Experience? Deffinately true! You can't debate your experiences with someone who hasn't had the same experience. Therefore it is just an argument that you can't win.
Putting people under the shame in public. Ouch... Is this how to love people?
lrdvader123 3 weeks ago in playlist Open Air Preaching
@lrdvader123 They can leave anytime they want. It's a public event to reach many people who want to stop and listen. Tell me this: If you saw a man crossing the street about to be hit by a car, but you could save him by pushing him out of the way, would you do so? Or would you think "I know he's about to be hit by that car, but pushing is mean, so I'll just wait and see what happens"? Of course you'd push them out of the way! No one's being forced to talk publicly with Ray.
GeekingForJesus 3 weeks ago
@GeekingForJesus I could say the same thing and start yelling in the microphone that people should do drugs. People aren't being forced to listen to me right? It's not a crime right? (yes it is, and If I did that i would go to jail)
oreowizard1 6 days ago
@oreowizard1 Would it be illegal? If you were stating a case on WHY people should be allowed to use illegal drugs, it wouldn't be illegal. If you were yelling on the streets trying to convince people to do something illegal, then it would be illegal. Since the Bible isn't illegal in the United States of America, Ray isn't breaking the law.
GeekingForJesus 6 days ago
@GeekingForJesus I never said he's breaking the law? but that doesn't mean he should be able to continue and annoy people in the streets. Bibles are available in MANY places, churches are everywhere. If people want to try out a religion, they can do so anytime they want. The idea that you suggest something and not take responsibility for it is ridiculous. (just because people have the ability to ignore it?)
oreowizard1 6 days ago
Wow..so sad for this lady.....
MsMomof3boyz 1 month ago
Have I ever told a lie? Yes, but not a harmful one.
Have I ever looked with lust? Yes, it's biological programming and harmless.
I can honestly say I've never stolen.
Have I ever blasphemed? Yes, it does no harm.
Am I a good person? Yes.
Will god forgive mefor being a good person? No.
Based on this information is god just? Well you tell me
AntiMatterWave 3 months ago 2
@AntiMatterWave Based off of that, you're not a good person because a sin is a sin. A lie is a lie, lust is lust, and even getting free music online is stealing. If you died today and you have not accepted Jesus' sacrifice, you would go to Hell.
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros Actually I am a good person, however I am a sinful person. Being bad is not synonymous with being sinful, which is the point I was making, also how am I supposed to accept it if I don't even believe it happenned?
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave Actually that's exactly what it means; sinful is being against God, and if your doing things against God, than that means you're an enemy of God. You're a liar, blasphemer, and adulterer based on what you said, so, I wpuld call you a bad person. Romans says that "there is none righteous, no not one". And even if you don't believe in Him, that doesn't change the fact that he is going to judge you according tgo your sins.
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros You're still not getting what I'm saying, I'm saying that even though I'd be considerred an enemy of god, I'm still not a bad person because the things that would make god consider me an enemy are not things that would make me bad. I'm saying that god's moral compass is flawed
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave Okay, well, based on what you told me, you're a liar, blasphemer, and adulterer. Would you call a liar a good person? If you would, than I would say that YOUR moral compass is flawed. And if God's moral compass is flawed, where do we get our morals from? (Serious question, I want to know what you believe)
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros there's nothing inherently bad about lying, it depends on the lie. I believe that we examine a given situation and assess the pros and cons of a given course of action. if the pros outweigh the cons then go for it, if not then don't. the reason we can't all get our morals from the same place is that different people have different morals, some don't care about others some do, some judge the same factors differently, god doesnt so he cant be the source of morallity
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave Very interesting points. But lying inherently is wrong; it's the severity of the lie that humanity can deem as harmful or not. And do remember: God is the source of good and bad, but he has also given us the gift/curse of free will. That decision can be made to ignore right and do wrong and can also influence others to do wrong as well. If God is not the source of good and bad, where does it come from?
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros Right and wrong are subjective which makes it impossible for something that does not implicitly cause harm to be inherently wrong. Something can however be objectively good or bad depending on whether it causes harm, whether something is good or bad is not decided by sentience but by effect, if bad things happen as a result then it is bad but if more good things happen than bad then it is right (different than good which means only good things happen implicitly)
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave But who gets to define what is good and bad? If it's up to the individual, then rape and child porn is acceptable to someone who believes in it. And if I were to say that you comments are physically and emotionally hurting me (they're not by the way, I love discussions like this) could your comments be deleted because they are causing me pain?
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros Like I said, good is when only something positive happens, bad is when something negative happens (e.g. killing someone) but bad can be right (e.g. if someone killed Stalin before he got to power) if it is the lesser of two evils. Things like rape are in a different ball park because rapists know that what they're doing is bad and wrong but they just don't care about the effects on others. good and bad are defined by effect, not a thinking mind
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave But who gets to decide what's positive and what is negative? You answering my question the same way. If I shoot the president because his policies are "ruining America," according to you, it would be acceptable because the country would be better off and the pro's outweigh the cons, correct or false?
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros America can be ruined to a variety of degrees, if it's just something like putting America through a financial crisis then no I don't agree but if he was being a complete fascist dictator, killing anyone who was different than what he thought was perfect regardless of what they'd done along with anyone who didn't agree with him then yes I'd agree. How positive or negative something is is to do with how much suffering it causes, not what someone chooses is positive
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave But to me, the pros outweigh the cons and it would be acceptable to kill a president hypothetically, because His policies are causing the suffering of the people, e.g., an executive order that says all whites must pay a tax. If I thought that way, who are you to tell me I'm wrong?
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros I can tell you that the suffering caused by his policies does not outweigh the suffering caused by his death, were that not the case then I would agree with you, however the reason that people have different moral views is because they percieve these things differently, all I can really say is that I don't agree with you or that I do, neither of us can actually be right
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave So if I kill a president, then I'm not wrong because I agree with my thinking, correct?
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros No, if the pros of killing the president outweigh the cons of killing the president then you are right, it's not about if you agree with your thinking, it's about what the effects are since that's the only kind of measurement that doesn't rely on oppinion but fact, what happens as a result is a fact, whether your thinking is right is oppinion
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave But that's what I'm saying. If I believe the pros of "saving American families from bad policies that destroy their lives and render them poor," outweigh the cons of killing a president, going to jail and providing grief for his family and supporters, am I doing something good?
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros You're clearly an intelligent person, I'll give you that. Really all anyone can do is assert their belief about it, you think you are, I disagree. I will however say that you aren't evil because to me someone is only evil if they know that what they're doing is wrong but do it anyway, in this case you would think that what you are doing is right
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave Much obliged for the compliment, I can tell you have given this subject careful thought as well. But John Wilkes Booth seriously thought that his plan to assassinate Abraham Lincoln was the right thing to do. Is the man who shot and killed the 16th president in cold blood not evil? Hitler thought the Holocaust was a righteous endeavour as well. Are these men evil or not?
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros I believe that what they did was wrong and in the case of Hitler it was extremelyt wrong but I don't say that they were evil. To me, to claim that someone is evil is synonymous with claiming that they knew what they were doing was wrong, Hitler didn't so he wasn't evil but he was very, very, very wrong
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave So Hitler wasn't evil, but that high school student who lied about doing his homework knowing he didn't is?
branchbros 2 months ago
Comment removed
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@branchbros Nope, that student didn't cause any harm, I therefore don't think that telling that lie was immoral and therefore cannot be evil. I'd say that evil is a view on intention as well as effect, not just intention
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave Well, if we use that logic, a failed terorist attack on New York doesn't make the terrorist evil because, although his intentions were bad, nothing "bad" happens. And do you think the teacher thinks that lying about grades does no harm? Or the overly involved parents? You can't subjectify good and evil because then they both disappear.
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros You absolutely can subjectify good and evil. The failed terrorist is evil because of his intention to do a bad thing if he knew he was doing the wrong thing. The event itself was not bad because nothing hapenned. You are however trying to get me to objectify a subjective rule, that's completely illogical, I can't give you a formula for evil when the formula would be variable. They can be subjectified because they are subjective
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave But then by what you are saying, someone who looks at child porn is not necessarily doing something wrong, or, again, someone who commits a murder is not necessarily doing something wrong. Good and evil cannot be subjective because then what's good and evil for you doesn't mean that someone who believes the opposite isn't wrong. Where's the logic in that?
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros Which completely explains the variation in moral codes between people, law was made as an objective idea of right and wrong, it never worked, if there was some kind of objective morallity then why is there so much variation. With regard to child porn, they aren't actually doing anything wrong until they express that urge by molesting a child, but I find it sick that anyone would want to, just like someone who WANTS to kill someone but doesn't isn't doing anything wrong.
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave No, my question has been from the beginning, who gets to decide what good and bad is? There is so much variation because, as I've said before, the choice to ignore morality can be passed on from person to person because we are like sheep. So, is child porn acceptable or unacceptable? According to your comment, it's not necessarily wrong...same with the intent to murder apparently. And how have laws never worked?
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros The maing of child porn is wrong, the viewing of it is sick, laws don't work because not everyone has the same morral code, no-one decides, if there was someone to decide we would have no variation, choosing to ignore morallity causes variation in behaviour, not in oppinions about what is wrong, there is no way to choose what to find right and wrong, if god decided we'd all have the samemoral codes but we don't because there's no objective basis
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave I'm not saying that laws decide what is right and wrong, after all Hitler followed the laws during WWII. Think of it this way: God sets the standard, but I, being a sinner, ignore that standard and come up with my own standard that suits me. That's why people have "varying" morals. If it were subjective, good and evil would not exist because they would change from person to person. Without God in the Bible, you can't define good and evil.
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros No, because you choose to ignore the standard you have varying behaviour, you haven't chosen what to find right or wrong so that doesn't explain varying morals, the lack of an objective standard, however, does. And about law not dictating right and wrong, that's exactly what I was saying about it not working.
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave And I agree that laws are not objective. And if you ignore the standard and decide that lying in certain situations is acceptable, are you not creating for yourself your own guidelines for living? You've decided what you feel is right and wrong, and your behavior reflects that. "Varying behavior" has nothing to do with this. And, again, if there is no objective standard, then there is no wrong. What say you?
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros When I hear someone lie I don't choose whether to think it's ok, I simply asses what harm it does and what good it does, I can't choose to think that it was wrong if I already think it's right, I can pretend that I think it's wrong but I don't really, if god gave me an objective idea of right and wrong then I wouldn't ever feel that a lie is right, I don't choose to or I'd just choose morals that siut me, like I'd choose to be ok with theft, but I'm not
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave God sets the standard but also gifts us with free will to reject or accept that standard. And you say you measure something by the harm it does, well who decides what harm is if it is subjective? Harm is doing wrong to others, but if right and wrong are subjective, then harm is subjective as well. Therefore, if I believed child porn was acceptable, I can look at your young daughter naked and desire her sexually but not be doing anything wrong.
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros That's my point, no-one has set the standard because there is no standard which is why people have varying morals and moral debates and conflicts. If you believe that you can choose what to find right and wrong then prove it to yourself by choosing to find murder objectively acceptable, just for a while, you can change back later, after all it's your choice according to you
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave You're right to the point that no person has or can set a standard of right and wrong. But why would you change back if you think that it's wrong? Are you saying now that there IS a standard but not one at the same time? If right and wrong is subjective, then, once again, I can come to your house, steal your valuables, kidnap your child and use them as a sex slave, and not be wrong in my actions because I believe I'm in the right. Do you see how illogical that is?
branchbros 2 months ago
@branchbros Are you now saying that you can choose what to find wrong but you can't choose what to find it wrong to choose to find wrong because they fall into the same category. You didn't choose to find murder wrong did you? You find it wrong because it does more harm than good. Right and wrong are subjective to culture as well as people and effect (e.g. If you define paedophlia as sex with an under 18 year old then in antiquity pretty much everyone was a paedophile)
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
@AntiMatterWave So wait, are you saying now that culture and society gets to define what is right and wrong? And can I have your address? Since you didn't answer my last point, I figure I can just come by and take all your things and do whatever I think is right inside your house.
branchbros 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@branchbros I specifically said "Right and wrong are subjective to culture as well as people and effect" The idea that it's ok to do whatever you want as long as you're cool with it isn't one I endorsed, if it were to get to such extremes as people being allowed to kill because it's just another action and so you just might find it ok the same way as you might find abortion ok then I would change what I'm saying. And yes, my address is 42 Minster Crescent Darwen Lancs. England
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
Ray, you know you are doing more harm than good right? People who are already Christians will think you are doing a good job, but to a non-believer's point of view, you are simply making Christians look even more stupid and annoying than we already appear to be. Stop air-preaching!
Casshyr 6 months ago
@Casshyr he does a great job getting peoples attention to proclaim the gospel to them as all Christains are commanded to do.
McHenryShawn73 5 months ago
@McHenryShawn73 oh he gets their attention alright, but in a negative way. Just look at the responses from the people: majority of them are disgusted and walk away. Sure, maybe 1% of the people will be interested, but majority end up being even further from Christ than before.
Casshyr 5 months ago
@Casshyr~ they dont like the message. The messanger (Ray) is not the problem.
He is VERY good at what he does!.... he gives good, to the point arguments.
God bless u.
marek0086 5 months ago 2
@marek0086 Ray is good only if you are a believer to begin with. He is passionate, speaks very clear, and in a way easy to understand. And he does seem like a good man. But when preaching to non-believers, he isn't the best person for the job. IMO he ends up driving them more away from Christ than towards. I have seen better pastors who are able to get non-believers more interested in Christianity.
Casshyr 5 months ago
Some men are powerless to believe God and nothing you say will make a difference. Ozbviously the young lady has no power to believe so to urge her about death and judgment is futile. Discernment realizes by good doctrine you cannot make a believer
polopowers1 6 months ago
UFO!!! 03:49
darkilustrisimus 6 months ago
lol why did the video stop just when it started getting interesting?
extion 6 months ago
Man I love the Gospel!!!! thank you Ray!!
heyLORDitsme 7 months ago
what corny emotional blackmail tactics...why are evangelists sociopaths?
Mahmood42978 8 months ago
@Mahmood42978 Hi. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on "evangelistic sociopaths." What do you think Christians should do? If you choose to answer, please remind me of what the issue is! Thanks!
shilohrenovation 5 months ago
This guy is good and fun as well. I wish more preachers be they steet or places of worship were more like him.
christopher6055 1 year ago
OH MY GODLESS !!
lostinxlation 1 year ago
I'm wondering how many lies ray has told in his life.
appeltaart88 1 year ago
oh i didnt kno womn have lust
1navyseal1962 1 year ago
Her denial is shocking!
lindseygrace79 1 year ago
hahaha what a little tricky way hes using to preach the Gospel hahahahahah im not sure if its right or wrong way of attempting.
CallmeMell 1 year ago
@MrXalexer Nothing defines a good or evil person there is no law no book that can tells us.
good and evil blur together. there are times when evil is good and good is evil. therefore there is no such thing as either.
Sarahlyonz 1 year ago
lol she is an atheist
Sarahlyonz 1 year ago
lol kiwi's. sigh I'm one of them I'm soo ashamed. but i still like Ray:)
I want to answer those questions.
Sarahlyonz 1 year ago
Praise God. Aloha and thank you Ray for being a soldier for Christ.
mauimom67 1 year ago 2
This is a argument for ignorance. You cannot profess to know what you cannot understand.
neoscape2012 1 year ago
I'd humor this guy with his god-based perception but now he's just spewing nonsense with "eternity". No one can claim to even understand eternity, yet these religious fucks claim they can KNOW eternity with their unproven and unjustifiable god. If they believe they will live forever because of their belief in a god, then who am i to burst their bubble. They will die, just like all of you and become rotting flesh.
neoscape2012 1 year ago
The only thing missing is the demonstration of the Holy Ghost in POWER, other than that, PRAISE GOD I LOVE THIS!!!!!! The message of Salvation will never wear out.
TerraformerOfLight 1 year ago
@TerraformerOfLight The power of God is in the preaching of the Word! The greatest miracle is for a sinner to be converted. Can you show us an example of this "missing demonstration of the Holy Ghost" He spoke with boldness in the midst of sinners...is this something you practice?
TheRegulator1984 1 year ago
@TheRegulator1984 Hi bro, The power of God is NOT ONLY the preaching of the word, but the DEMOSTRATION of the word;
Luke 9:2 And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick.
Romans 15:19 Through mighty signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of God; so that from Jerusalem, and round about unto Illyricum, I have fully preached the gospel of Christ.
SO I AGREE!!!! It IS in demonstration of the Holy Ghost, but not the FULL demonstration. I personally do BOTH.
TerraformerOfLight 1 year ago
@TheRegulator1984, I HAVE TO practice the preaching of the Gospel in the midst of sinners, there is no other way to do it, and they don't always like to hear me, but as soon as someone gets healed by the power of God, oh how quickly they become interested in what you have to say, that what healing/deliverance and or miracle is to an unbeliever, it is a sign! Like Jesus said, Mark 16:17 and these signs shall follow them that believe in my name they shall... They are a sign that points to Jesus!
TerraformerOfLight 1 year ago
@TerraformerOfLight I'd like to see one of your videos of you healing folks in the street....you ever heard of Justin Peters? Look him up on youtube he exposes all these fakes. Copland, Duplantis, Hinn and others.
TheRegulator1984 1 year ago
@TheRegulator1984. some will be coming soon, but not because you asked about it, but because Jesus Christ and His precious Gospel needs to saturate this planet completely, and I will be a part of that by any means, I have to be!
TerraformerOfLight 1 year ago
@TerraformerOfLight Benny Hinn is close to the Pope as well, what do you make of that?
TheRegulator1984 1 year ago
@TheRegulator1984 Who cares, leave it up to God, pray for the pope and pray for Benny Hinn and stop the pointing of the finger. Brother, that;s not your job! YOU PREACH THE GOSPEL, HEAL THE SICK, CAST OUT DEVILS, RAISE THE DEAD, SAVE SOULS, THAT IS YOUR JOB SO DON'T WASTE TIME POINTING THE FINGER AT ANYONE ELSE BUT YOURSELF, I CHALLENGE YOU IN THE HOLY GHOST!!!!! GET BUSY WITH THE FATHER'S BUSINESS, let your fruit in His Kingdom speak for you, because you will have to answer for EVERY idle word!
TerraformerOfLight 1 year ago
@TerraformerOfLight Have you ever raised the dead? And God tell's us to expose darkness eph 5:11. If someone isn't preaching sound doctrine and has been caught in many scandals, we should warn the Body of a wolf in the midst...and that's exactly what Benny is. Your probably about to say what every charismatic says "Don't speak against God's anointed" but he is not God's. Judge him by his fruit! Not these so called signs, even the devil does that, but he can't bear fruit of righteousness.
TheRegulator1984 1 year ago
@TheRegulator1984 Benny Hinn is such a fake!
WOOTMIX 1 year ago
@TerraformerOfLight Never mind I just saw your channel...you know Kathryn Kuhlman was a master psychic and hypnotist chosen by the Catholic Church to bring in the signs and wonders movement. Benny Hinn even admits to using hypnotism. I was deceived by this movement for about 6yrs of my walk. Until God showed me the true light. This movement comes straight from the Kaballah. Satan is slick, he doesn't come to us in a red suit with a pitch fork...he comes to us dressed like Benny Hinn.
TheRegulator1984 1 year ago
@TheRegulator1984, Who told you that! Do you think the devil is called the accuser of the brethren for no reason? Did you hear Khulman herself say that? Or did you hear Benny Hinn himself say that? Or did you HEAR SAY? Was it some website made to discredit men and women of God, beware lest you get deceived brother. I've been to a Benny Hin meeting, and more than once, I don't agree with ALL the entirety of what he teaches BUT, HE IS OF GOD and GOD IS WITH HIM, make no mistake, he is my brother.
TerraformerOfLight 1 year ago
@TerraformerOfLight Yes, Benny has admitted to using hypnotism. I've also been to one of his crusades. And of course Khuman wouldn't say that. I was raised up in this stuff and even practiced it for a few years... 99% of it is man, and mysticism. Look into the nature of the Kaballah and how it is the same as the charismatic movement. I believe in the supernatural power of God, but not people like Benny and others associated with him.
TheRegulator1984 1 year ago
@TerraformerOfLight Look this up on youtube. "Exposing Word of Faith Prosperity Gospel:Justin Peters"
Can you show us in the bible things like being "slain in the spirit" "holy laughter" people barking like dogs, running around speaking in tongues, and the "little god" theology that makes man look like God and God look like a man?
TheRegulator1984 1 year ago
Peter Jackson lol
KseniaDS 1 year ago
Well done :Rom 10.15 beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things.
One day we will all stand before the loving creator either as his friend or enemy.
you choose.
williamtooth 1 year ago
@MrXalexer Ray Comfort, what is a good person?
SlimeTron5000 1 year ago
That girl is cool, she doesn't buy his BS
CMO999 1 year ago
@RichieD814 Depends on what context you put it in. Like saying if someone say's your mom's name, in a form of disrespect.
Shoots1978 1 year ago
Comfort should pull the banana out of his butt. He is the ultimate liar. Liars for Christ.
DoubtingThomas666 1 year ago
this is a great way to preach the Gospel...very interesting..God bless the harvest..
peacechild61 1 year ago
Ray must have had a win sandwich for breakfast because he totally won.
ThisIsAVideoForJesus 1 year ago 2
She obviously doesn't speak english fluently or extremely well, and Ray's accent doesn't really help. She probably doesn't understand most of what he's saying (not an insult, learning a language is indeed difficult).
FlyingSpahghettiMan 1 year ago
Really, Ray. I know you love your 10 Commandments appeal to emotion, but at least try to go 5 minutes without whipping it out.
drgodsauce 1 year ago
@JesusIsMyAnswer
Can you prove that he didn't Zeus DIDN'T rise from the dead or that JESUS did?
because you have a book and i have a book so which book is right. my book has prophecies that have come true. Zeus created everything you see before you he is the genesis and the singularity he is resplendent and holy you have hardened your heart against him he's the one and only god and if you don't come to him punishment will be vile and eternal in Hades
repent the kingdom of Olympia is at hand
Leadman1989 1 year ago
Religion makes healthy, morally normal people say ridiculous things
sulljoh1 1 year ago
wow! well at least she has heard the gospel.
sldeyo 1 year ago
@sldeyo She heard it before, if you were listening.
FlyingSpahghettiMan 1 year ago
@FlyingSpahghettiMan : I don't know what she has heard before, because the actual recording of what she was told isn't recorded...or even on ty. But I do know this,according to This one particular vid,she has at least heard the gospel one time. Thanks for responding!
sldeyo 1 year ago
@sldeyo She spoke of missionaries in Korea or Japan (dont remember). Dont sweat it.
FlyingSpahghettiMan 1 year ago
Comment removed
sldeyo 1 year ago
@FlyingSpahghettiMan : If you don't know what was said by the other missionaries(Korean and Japanese) or even remember...why are you 'sweating' me by telling me to listen?? The madness of atheism.....complete madness.....
sldeyo 1 year ago
@JesusIsMyAnswer
im sorry the correct answer was Zeus... aww so close... well it's hell for you
Leadman1989 1 year ago
How did Ray go from ''something created everything'' (which I personnally don't believe) ...to the Bible is the inerrant word of this ''something''? What a douchebag! ...and duping people into listening to you by throwing out free money and posing as an IQ examiner is a big big lie. The Korean girl was exceptionnally honest making her far more moral! Ray Comfort: You are a deceitful, obnoxius man whi knows absolutely nothing other than how to badger people... Your disgusting!
ndjm00 1 year ago
You say you've broken all 10 commandments...WHO HAVE YOU MURDERED RAY?
thesponge11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thesponge11 Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life in him. [1 John 3:15]
You've murdered too =)
donovanrules123123 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123
thought crimes how dictatorial
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 Scared of being held accountable for every sin you've ever committed? Including those done in the flesh and in the mind? Can't run, can't hide, God sees everything. Repent and accept Jesus into your heart while you still can.
donovanrules123123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@donovanrules123123
Scared of being held accountable for every sin you've ever committed? Including those done in the flesh and in the mind? Can't run, can't hide, Jupiter sees everything. Repent and accept Apollo into your heart while you still can
i bet you're trembling in your boots... you're not -- i guess it's because you DO NOT BELIEVE in those gods RIGHT? why do you expect me to accept yours without an EVIDENCE?
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 Over 5000 Greek manuscripts for the life of Jesus. 24'000 for the New Testament, and over 800'000 biblical artifacts. Jesus was a historical person, His life was well documented. You either trust in Him or you don't. I know I do.
donovanrules123123 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123 No. Not one eye witness account. No artifacts of his life. Nazareth didn't even exist till after the SECOND century. watch?v=WSzQC1zKesU
His life is a void. There is nothing demonstrable and nothing solid. In fact the lack of evidence is just shocking.
jwissick 1 year ago
@jwissick Pliny the Younger, Tacitus, Suetonius, Josephus, Mara bar Sarapion, The Talmud, Dead Sea Scrolls, Thallus, Lucian, Celsus, Acts of Pilate.
Tons of evidence outside the bible mate. I think it's about time you pulled your head out of your ass. If you reject Jesus than you may as well reject
donovanrules123123 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123 Sorry. Not one of those are EYE witnesses. Josephus is a well documented FORGERY. The Talmud was written in the 5th century and it's authors didn't believe in jesus. Tacitus wasn't an eye witness born decades after the supposed crucifixion as was Pliny, Lucian, Celsus, Suetonius, Mara bar Sarapion. Thallus never mentions jesus. Acts of Pilate is a FOURTH century document.
In short, you have ZIP and my claim stands. Time for you to pull YOUR head out of your ass.
jwissick 1 year ago
@jwissick If you reject Jesus than you may as well reject Lucretius, Pliny, Plato, Caesar, Tacitus, Aristotle, and so on. Seeing as the New Testament is the most well supported document in the history of man. 5600 manuscripts with an accuracy of 99.5%, written less than 100 years afer. While there are only 7 for Plato (1200 yrs), 10 for Caesar (1000 yrs), and 49 for Aristotle (1400 yrs).
donovanrules123123 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123 Meaningless. Fiction, no matter how well it is copied, doesn't make it non-fiction.
The NT is NOT supported by history. It is not supported by archeology. It is NOT supported by artifacts. It is NOT supported by eye witness accounts.
In short, you believe FICTION to be true.
jwissick 1 year ago
@jwissick Google "biblical artifacts", tons of pictures for you. I'm done here, I'm tired of talking with a liar.
donovanrules123123 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123 show me an artifact of moses or Jesus or Noah or any of the apostles. Show me a roman record of the dead who rose after the crucifixion. Show me roman accounts of the miracles of jesus.
They don't exist.
jwissick 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123 And then show me where I lied.... If you can.
jwissick 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123
if they were claiming to walk on water instead of revealing mathematical truths then i would reject them... but what they claim is completely with in the realm of possibility
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123
im impressed you either went to some RELIGIOUS website or completely made up those stats JUST for me? im flattered
Hitler was a real person you either trust him or you don't... the god of the bible IF real endorses MURDER, SLAVERY, RAPE, GENOCIDE, INFANTICIDE, ABORTION, and ANIMAL ABUSE
now why would i trust THAT? oh and could you provide your sources?
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 36
“Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”
Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[a] This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b] All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” [MATTHEW 22:36-40]
Get some of Lee Strobel's books as he talks about Jesus. Strobel was an atheist who researched the evidence for Jesus.
donovanrules123123 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123
what makes you think i don't know about or haven't read lee strobel's work... to be quite frank with you some of the MIND NUMBINGLY IGNORANT things he says about atheism makes me doubt he was ever one
bible quotes are worthless... jesus could have existed (i don't believe he did) but he wasn't the son of god NO EVIDENCE
unprepared college students? yeah that's not gonna cut it
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123 (cont) If we want to put functional spirituality and human reciprocity values religious prophets taught, it is up to us. What our ancestors considered 'real' is outmoded. The use of the Scientific Method and our understanding of nature, is the true and intelligent way for social concern. That is the tool for this functional spirituality; but societies reject it.
SlimeTron5000 1 year ago
Not to mention there are documents supporting every god that ever existed some more closely than jesus... who doesn't even have an original story it's copied from several other deities that came before him
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 The difference is that those other god/s aren't historical people. Jesus, however, is. Again, read Lee Strobel's books. Their cheap and easy to read. Also, you can type into youtube "give me an answer" and watch some of the videos with Cliffe debating college students. Great stuff, seriously.
donovanrules123123 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123
have YOU read any of the arguments against jesus? my guess is no my guess is you've only read the supporting arguments that means you aren't fully informed but INDOCTRINATED i'll read and watch that stuff "more of it anyway" when you read the arguments that are against your dogma
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 Yeah, the bible is one document that supports those gods. And some of those gods are no more than men, playing god. Or I mean acting like a god, even as God has said, "you are god's" (sarcastically).
Shoots1978 1 year ago
Stop pontiff to your religious lip service and the endless saviours that discuss values for humanity. There are those continually opinionated opinions about who we are, and our origination; that is unimportant for the most concerning issue is the society here and now. (cont)
SlimeTron5000 1 year ago
(cont) Society is terribly suffering from unsustainable monetary systems, economics, and devalued culture. So worrying whether a 'divine being' composed the universe, or biological organisms, gas explosions, and evolution are indeed meaningless. These do not change the problems we have now. We cannot let some imaginative revelation divide and guide us to a correct direction. The human species is very capable of changing. (cont)
SlimeTron5000 1 year ago
@Shoots1978
Jesus was a man acting like a god thank you for clearing that up for me :D
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123 A god that holds people responsible for thought crime is no god but a tyrant.
jwissick 1 year ago
@jwissick And yet, this so called "tyrant" came down to earth 2000 years ago and bled and suffered on a cross so that you may be forgiven and have eternal life. If it wasn't for this "tyrant" then humanity would have no hope....everyone would be condemned to hell because NO ONE is good. God by definition cannot be a tyrant because He looks out for YOUR interests. All the laws He made (many which u have broken), are there to guide you to having a better life. Repent and accept Jesus today!
donovanrules123123 1 year ago
@donovanrules123123 No, he didn't. There is no evidence outside the bible (which contains virtually no accurate historical data) that your jesus even existed. There are no contemporary documents that even hold his name let alone record a single miracle or even the name of his disciples. Not even Paul recorded any of jesus's miracles. There are no eye witness accounts. The bible is as much proof for jesus as Harry Potter is proof of wizards.
jwissick 1 year ago
@jwissick
i only hope to one day be as good as you sir... you've absolutely positively destroyed this man it's actually pretty touching :P
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 Lol. Yer not so bad yourself. Just know your facts and where to find them whe you need the sources. Lots of bookmarks.,
jwissick 1 year ago
@LovesSockMonkey I don't believe in reincarnation, I not using the word "reincarnation" in a literal way, just a type of figure of speech.
jonathanfater 1 year ago
@mattandpatti222 Paul, aka Saul was chosen by Jesus to be an apostle, If Jesus knew he was gonna teach lies then he would've not been chosen. Right now the only anti-christ I can think of is YOU
jonathanfater 1 year ago
I love Ray Comfort, hes awesome, he has guts to stand in public and preach the Gospel to random people. surely Ray Comfort is the reincarnation of the apostle Paul.
jonathanfater 1 year ago
@jonathanfater Paul sucked! He was the anti-christ! he was NOT an apostle! and taught against Yeshua.
mattandpatti222 1 year ago
@jonathanfater There is no such thing as reincarnation. Just like the misconception that some people have that once a person dies, they become an angel.
HEBREWS 9:27 (NIV) - "27 Just as people are destined to die once, and after that to face judgment,"
Hope that helps. Be Blessed!!
LovesSockMonkey 1 year ago
@LovesSockMonkey
can you prove there's no reincarnation?
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 Yes, HEBREWS 9:27 (NIV) - "27 Just as people are destined to die once, and after that to face judgment,"
Be Blessed!!
LovesSockMonkey 1 year ago
@LovesSockMonkey
I meant scientific because it kind of follows logic that if someone DOES believe in reincarnation that they wouldn't or most likely NOT believe in the bible do you have any EXTRA-BIBLICAL evidence? not to mention you still have to prove that it's an ACCURATE and CREDITABLE source
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 What type of scientific proof are you looking for? Because as for me, I never needed any proof except from the Bible. I never looked anywhere outside of the Bible. So, if you are looking for me to give you scientific proof, can't help you there. I don't believe in science to show me the facts about what the Bible already says. I have Faith that it is true. Be Blessed!!
LovesSockMonkey 1 year ago
@LovesSockMonkey
There's no evidence that reincarnation is real zero the same about of evidence exist for there being a god but that doesn't stop you from dismissing one and excepting the other for which there is also no evidence you and the people that believe in reincarnation scientology and unicorns are on the same playing field - if you don't believe/trust science unplug your computer take of your clothes and go live in the forest nice and safe from science
may god-b-less
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 I DON'T believe in reincarnation, scientology or unicorns, along with quite a few other things. So, not sure why you are lumping me in that group. There is no evidence that reincarnation exist, unless you know of someone who died and came back as someone/something else. Lets see your proof that it does exist.
Why would I trust science, it is always changing. God's Word never does. In my prayers. Be Blessed!!
LovesSockMonkey 1 year ago
@LovesSockMonkey
I DON'T believe in reincarnation either and you may not but you do believe in OTHER things for which there is no evidence... which was my point
I trust in science because it corrects itself and seeks the truth... since when is being hard-headed and refusing to change with new evidence a GOOD thing?
and if you don't trust science then like i said why don't you give up your HOUSE your CAR your TELEVISION your CLOTHES and just about everything SURROUNDING YOU!!!
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 What evidence are you looking for? What OTHER things are you referring to that I am suppose to be believing in? As far as science goes, it has many definitions. It depends on what you are applying it to. I don't believe in the science that tries so hard to disprove the Bible. If you feel the need to call me hard-headed because I believe in the one true God and the Bible (His Word), then so be it. If it were not for God, I would not have what I have!!
LovesSockMonkey 1 year ago
@LovesSockMonkey
im pointing out that you're a hypocrite ridiculing the beliefs of others while your beliefs ARE JUST AS LAUGHABLE
NO you redefine science to fit your misconstrued world view... your god violates all branches of science what you're implying is a WORLD WIDE conspiracy of scientist that just HATE god for some unknown reason and want to hide all evidence of him behind science that APPEARS to work and describe nature in every conceivable way
what do YOU consider science then
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 Quite frankly I am not sure what you expected to gain by name calling and judging someone when you don't know them. You asked a question about Reincarnation. I answered it, you agreed that you don't believe in it either. So not sure why you keep going to more stuff. If you want to debate something, you picked the wrong person. Either you believe in the one true God & the Bible or you don't. Debating someone who believes will not change either of ours minds. In my prayers!!
LovesSockMonkey 1 year ago
@LovesSockMonkey
don't worry i know you're immune to logic and reason you've been brainwashed well enough if you were born in the middle east you would be telling me how allah is the one TRUE god if you were born in nordic times you would be telling me how thor is the one TRUE GOD it's not new but hopefully with better education and more openness of information (internet) people will become less superstitious and less willing to believe unproven unfounded CRAP
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 Did you know Christianity started in the Middle East? There is only one true God, and if you had an open mind and an openheart, you would see this. Only those who actually are free thinkers can come to God, but those who have succombed to the modern day theories of evolution and universalism have a hard time accepting anything new. And by the way, he is not calling anyone names or judging them. He is letting them admit to their own sins not him accusing them.
gwhand39 1 year ago
@gwhand39
all ABRAHAMIC religions started in the middle east... now what about the THOUSANDS of other purported gods and 100s upon 100s of religions? what about the gods that came before jesus with virtually the SAME life stories and claims? you mean they are skeptics just accepting something for no good reason is stupid all of the science that i accept has evidence to back it up you calling me closed minded is the most ass backward thing i think has ever happened you don't even know me
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 The gods as you say before Jesus were men, He was before them all. He alway's existed, even before He came to earth. Man has alway's made himself to be like God. Even today, God said you are god's. In the Psalms.
Shoots1978 1 year ago
@Shoots1978
you are so hopelessly deluded... if the GODS before JESUS were men then why do you believe that JESUS wasn't? could it be that you were raised to believe that he wasn't when he actually was or more likely DIDN'T EXIST AT ALL?
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 I do believe Jesus is God. He didn't make Himself to be God, He The God. He alway's was and is. He existed before them. As He said in John 8, "Before Abraham was, "I AM". Here's the greek word for I AM, imee. first person singular presumed indicative; a prolonged form of a primary and defective verb; I exist (used only when emphatic) :- am, have been, × it is I, was. —Strong's Talking Greek & Hebrew Dictionary
Shoots1978 1 year ago
@Shoots1978
god is real because the bible is true because god says the bible is true
you don't get how that's circular reasoning? you have to have EVIDENCE
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989 Obama is real because he lives in the white house, because I see him in there. Yeah, that's circular reasoning and I will stick with it. Sounds good to me. :)
Shoots1978 1 year ago
@Shoots1978
and what makes jesus any differen't? how do you know he wasn't A MAN acting like a god?...
no no no that's not circular reasoning that's called DEMONSTERABLY VERIFIABLE you can GO to the white house and TOUCH him it's called EVIDENCE.. you see him be cause he's real he's real becuase all of your senses give you information (sight touch sound) as proof of his existence and 3rd party verification i can see him too there for it is reasonable to come to the conclusion that he exist
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@LovesSockMonkey As Ray has said in several of his commentaries, a man( or woman) with an experience is not at the mercy of a man with an argument. It takes an experience to know it is true. No experience? Can't really be sure. Experience? Deffinately true! You can't debate your experiences with someone who hasn't had the same experience. Therefore it is just an argument that you can't win.
gwhand39 1 year ago
@jonathanfater Error 404: theology not found
anonazero 1 year ago
@jonathanfater
he's certainly dishonest enough to fit the bill
Leadman1989 1 year ago
This is true evil.
01jerm10 1 year ago