That williams renault is so quick! easily THE best F1 car ever designed in my opinion. and senna knows just how quick the car is, theres is no point in senna letting mansell straight through just because his cars faster, he took every chance to keep his position for as long as possible. two world class drivers on a great circuit, heavenly.
i like mansell a lot... i think he is one of the best ever had in F1, but this overtake was not just, becouse he loose the chicane and get out with much more power to overtake senna in the end of the next part of the circuit...
my god mansell's car is so much quicker he can just lose 10 yards on senna then just put his foot down and drive straight past him as if he doesn't exist...this williams was one of the greatest cars ever designed...
schums haters are just like FIA of nowadays ,they're blinded and like to watch cars going round and around without any sensation or drving skills,Schum is the last f1 driver of the golden age.Berger said in our days Moves like schumi did in Hongary 2010 were normal moves.
They only finished 2nd besause of Senna's sheer brilliance as a driver, the 92 MP4/7 was severely handicapped by handling issues and Honda refusing to develope the engine knowing they were going to withdraw at the end of the year you colosal clitoris!
@Giova2022 absolutely agree. this circuit was amazing before these idiots not ruined it effectively and turned into another boring faceless Tilke's ugliness
The McLaren MP4/7 was a Cuban taxi compared to the Williams. Poor design, unreliable, and the Honda V12 was a slug. Even the Benetton was a better car. Making Senna drive that sorry excuse for a car was like telling Mozart to make music with a gong.
@derkommissar1917 The MP4/7 was rushed into action too soon. It's actually pretty surprising that McLaren created such a dud considering that the Williams-Renault package was better even in 1991 and you'd think McLaren would have been sharpening its knives in the off-season.
Nonsense. Although not as technically advanced as the Williams FW14B (which is where the speed came from), the MP4/7 was STILL good enough for Berger to take two wins with it. Schumacher only won 1 race with the Benetton and Brundle won none. The 1992 Ferrari was a sorry excuse for a car. It was nowhere near competitive.
The Honda V12 was far from a slug. After all it won the 1991 championship and judging by the speed trap in late 1992 it was still the most powerful engine.
@McLarenMercedes I said the Benetton was better, not faster. The Benetton was actually reliable (unlike the 12 retirements in 28 starts for the MP4/7), which is why Schumi was able to finish third in the championship with it. Senna and Berger won five races in 1992 in spite of their crummy car, not because of it. The Honda V12 was so good (not) that when Mugen got control of the Honda F1 engine program after the season, they immediately went back to the V10.
@McLarenMercedes Citin Bergers 2 wins as evidence of the McLarens strength is disingenous - Bergers 2 wins were Canada and Australia - In Canada he inherited the win after Senna and Brundle ahead of him retired with mechanical failure - Brundle in fact almost won his only ever victory here (arguably he deserved it - he was faster than Schumacher that day) - thats how good the Benetton was! In Australia, again Berger inherited the win after Senna and Mansell crashed out WAAAAY ahead of him!
@McLarenMercedes Also - you imply Berger was a B-grader like Johnny Herbert or Barrichello - as if him winning means a car is sensational - in fact Berger was VERY VERY fast - he won 10 GP (more than all but a handful of drivers in history).
You would be more honest quoting Johnny Herberts 2 wins in 95 as evidence of the MASSIVE superiority of the Schui's Benetton over the Williams
@McLarenMercedes You are wrong, It was a terrible car! Berger only won both those races because Mansell, Patrese and Senna had DNF's in both, Berger was very lucky to win in Canada and Australia he had no competition from the Williams drivers and Senna his team leader.
@flipsidedogchop Chop! If you tally up all Mansell's, Patrese's and even Schumi's DNF's you get 13 the same as Senna and Berger combined, it was a piece of shit while the Williams was brilliant with Mansel only ever finishing 1st or 2nd the entire season
@flipsidedogchop Compare that to MP4/6, and you'll have your answer. :/ Also you should read something about what Senna thought about this car, geeeez.
@flipsidedogchop "Compare that to MP4/6, and you'll have your answer" - that WAS an answer, you cheapshit! And don't tell me to fuck off, moron - you better go and read something what Senna had to say about that car. Not my fault that Berger and Senna managed to won some races with that car. Geeez, how old are you, to be so nervous about somebody having different opinion than yours, 12? Go to your momma, and tell her to fuck off, fuckfaced cocktwat.
@flipsidedogchop That's why I deleted comment, geez. Lack of arguments, so you decided to go for a "picky" stuff, right? That's LOW, dude. Stupid fanboys. You're the Oxford grad.? Pffffff... more like lo-life faggot. Stupid motherfucker, having a problem with my different-than-his opinion, and now he says I AM defensive, wow... And by the way - "fuck off" was firstly used by you, so... enough said about your mother - she is whore, simply.
@flipsidedogchop That's the lowest comment I've ever read, geeeez, you're pathetic, dude o_O You should learn something about polish squadron 303, who actually help you, english fuckers, out during battle of britain. Forget it, you must be oxford drop out if you don't know BASICS about your own country history. Lame ass little dicked pussy-annoying McLaren-fanboy prick. Oh, and by the way, your mother is STILL dirty slut.
@flipsidedogchop I wonder why as smart person as you (LOL) won't reply with any sense to me saying "why don't you read what Senna had to say about that car", huh? I guess that would do the justice to me, and in the same time you would have to cry, because Senna also had different-than-yours opinion. DIE, motherfucker!
@flipsidedogchop and AGAIN: " I wonder why as smart person as you (LOL) won't reply with any sense to me saying "why don't you read what Senna had to say about that car", " - go ahead, show me some real arguments.
It's a shame because theres no lack of excitement in F1! Since the mid 00's seasons have exceeded many of the seasons in the 90'es and early 00's!
BUT... the cars today really look like poor drawings from a drunk 3 year old!
It all could be so great...ad the close championship battles that we have seen the last 5 years, with the looks AND sound as good as those in the early 90's...that would be niiice! :-)
@ssssroryssss was talking about the progress from how the old cars looked and sounded, to present day machines, not how fast they could go..miss the sound of V10`s and V12`s,manual gear changes and the fact that they used to have grip. just reckon the racing isn`t as exciting as it used to be.
@gowdridge i totally agree, it seems that with progress, every golden age is followed systematically by an neutering period, a dulling down refinement of that golden age in accordance with unforeseen dangers, threats and peripheral developments. Hopefully in a few years we'll see more exciting cars than today's dead, lifeless ones
@kurwajegopierdolona Rules were even stricter back then so be quiet, Senna got disqualified from the 1989 Japanese race for using the cut through after the collision with Prost.
@kurwajegopierdolona he didnt actually gain any advantage in that particular move, he didnt overtake senna with that move, so no, he wouldn't get penalised
Power is actually about the same as now! Most engines of 92-93 had 700-750 BHP! The engines today is about 750 BHP!
It's not the power levels that are wrong, it's the look, sound, and stupid things such as KERS!
And BTW: Hamilton won the GP2 with 600 bhp with VERY narrow rear tires (not super wide slicks like these...which are cooler)... but if you can control them you can control most cars!
nowadays f1 is shit,Mansell wouldn''t accept to drive under shit rules,Schumi accepts but he's suffering now cause he couldn't drive aggressively as he used to do in f1 last golden years.
No advantage for Mansell? For sure there was an advantage ;) Just think there wouldnt have been tarmac but gravel; he would have lost a few more seconds ;)
No discussion, mansell was faster and would have past senna without cutting chicanes too ;)
Its the same with Hamilton few years ago. Would there have been gravel or a wall, he wouldnt had past kimi.
I don't think Mansell cut the chicane out of choice; the car fishtails under braking for Ostkurve, thus ending up too deep into the chicane to be able to make the second apex. Great era for F1 though. Senna & Mansell did have their run ins, but you could tell they had massive respect for each other.
No advantage from cutting the chicane at all, he was already all over the back of the McLaren. I loved this time, so many great names, great looking cars, innovation driven by the teams not the FIA and the racing was ok too.
Also is it me or does it just look so much more punishing for the drivers, old f1 races always look like they took place in baking heat!
@Abujamra2 WTF are you talking about noob? I was a huge Williams-Renault Patrese fan at the time. If you watch the entire race (which I have on video), Senna gives Nigel the wave through for a pass.
@Audioquest56 Yes, it was purely Senna's talent that he was even close in any of the races in '92. He quite rightly waved Mansell through as there was no way he way going to hold him off for very long and instead preserved his tires as best he could for a battle with Patrese for second.
@tor378a Yes, I agree with you. Nigel was weaving back and forth like a maniac and Senna realized there was no way he was going to keep the Williams behind him. Of course, Senna did manage to hold off Patrese and force him into a spin on the corner to stadium section, thus finishing second.
Of course if that had happened now Mansell would have been given a 25 second penalty for gaining an unfair advantage by drivong off the track, like Hammy on Raikonnen at Spa 08. 92 was AWESOME!
LOL...Yeah Great footage, too bad Nigel missed the chicane completely probably out of frustration. LOL Senna always did thet at Nigel. I can't imagine that pass counting?
The old circuit was the best !
MURRA1 3 weeks ago
Senna's Mclaren had a lack of 100 horespower. That's a lot on a circuit like the old Hockenheim
CanYurGameTV 3 weeks ago
That williams renault is so quick! easily THE best F1 car ever designed in my opinion. and senna knows just how quick the car is, theres is no point in senna letting mansell straight through just because his cars faster, he took every chance to keep his position for as long as possible. two world class drivers on a great circuit, heavenly.
thatciggaweed 1 month ago
i like mansell a lot... i think he is one of the best ever had in F1, but this overtake was not just, becouse he loose the chicane and get out with much more power to overtake senna in the end of the next part of the circuit...
anderwicz 1 month ago
I was at this race with my father when I was 11 years old!!! good memories!!
WaketoWakes 1 month ago 4
Mansell missed the chicane and nothing was said, Prost missed the chicane a year later and was given a stop go for it, how can that be right????
devilscoachman79 1 month ago
my god mansell's car is so much quicker he can just lose 10 yards on senna then just put his foot down and drive straight past him as if he doesn't exist...this williams was one of the greatest cars ever designed...
rendlesham 2 months ago
i love the cars...but...today... :/
tunedIN101 3 months ago
Just love the sound of that allmighty Renault.
lazerpod66 3 months ago
Imagine KERS and DRS at old the Hockenheim?!
It would be like Nascar. No thanks...
I loved the old Hockenheim...
Stereolabdream 4 months ago
Mansell´s car was too much better... thats all!!!
HERA2006 5 months ago
F1 is shite nowadays, all mickey mouse circuits. Thank God for "Eau Roughe"
TrueGoth1 5 months ago
@TrueGoth1 And don't forget Suzuka. Can't wait for the Grand Prix this weekend.
dossard15 4 months ago
The kind of blocking that Senna did there would have been black flagged now...god I miss the old days and the incomparable Senna.
smocklock 5 months ago
Ohhh, Ayrton cutting like Michael in Monza too .... but no cry or whine from the Schumacher-haters...
samothsamothsamoth 5 months ago
@samothsamothsamoth
schums haters are just like FIA of nowadays ,they're blinded and like to watch cars going round and around without any sensation or drving skills,Schum is the last f1 driver of the golden age.Berger said in our days Moves like schumi did in Hongary 2010 were normal moves.
shame on f1 and drivers and fia of nowadays!!!
poussyledzep 4 months ago
@poussyledzep Indeed....Gerhard Berger was known for producing very wide mclarens, ferraris or benettons :)
AlejjSi 1 month ago
he gained no adventage!!!!
hes overtaking him in the slipstream
TheCocoLokko 5 months ago
They only finished 2nd besause of Senna's sheer brilliance as a driver, the 92 MP4/7 was severely handicapped by handling issues and Honda refusing to develope the engine knowing they were going to withdraw at the end of the year you colosal clitoris!
kouzouka 5 months ago
The renault engine was just massivly powerful! fastest car in a stright line
lostwill86 5 months ago
OLD Hockenheim fantastic circuit !!!
Giova2022 6 months ago 16
@Giova2022 snooze fest. straight, chicane, straight, another chiczne, straight, yawn yawn.
TheMagnatar 3 weeks ago
@Giova2022 absolutely agree. this circuit was amazing before these idiots not ruined it effectively and turned into another boring faceless Tilke's ugliness
redupfox 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dure a passer senna
jacbrest 6 months ago
the 92 mclaren was bad compared to the williams.
the 93 was even worse.
eudemonarecool 7 months ago
The McLaren MP4/7 was a Cuban taxi compared to the Williams. Poor design, unreliable, and the Honda V12 was a slug. Even the Benetton was a better car. Making Senna drive that sorry excuse for a car was like telling Mozart to make music with a gong.
derkommissar1917 7 months ago
@derkommissar1917 Yeah, we ALL know that. But this moronic @flipsidedogchop knows better, he's soooooooooo omniscient :D
thylegion 7 months ago
@derkommissar1917 The MP4/7 was rushed into action too soon. It's actually pretty surprising that McLaren created such a dud considering that the Williams-Renault package was better even in 1991 and you'd think McLaren would have been sharpening its knives in the off-season.
Audioquest56 7 months ago
@derkommissar1917
Nonsense. Although not as technically advanced as the Williams FW14B (which is where the speed came from), the MP4/7 was STILL good enough for Berger to take two wins with it. Schumacher only won 1 race with the Benetton and Brundle won none. The 1992 Ferrari was a sorry excuse for a car. It was nowhere near competitive.
The Honda V12 was far from a slug. After all it won the 1991 championship and judging by the speed trap in late 1992 it was still the most powerful engine.
McLarenMercedes 6 months ago
@McLarenMercedes I said the Benetton was better, not faster. The Benetton was actually reliable (unlike the 12 retirements in 28 starts for the MP4/7), which is why Schumi was able to finish third in the championship with it. Senna and Berger won five races in 1992 in spite of their crummy car, not because of it. The Honda V12 was so good (not) that when Mugen got control of the Honda F1 engine program after the season, they immediately went back to the V10.
derkommissar1917 6 months ago
@derkommissar1917 AMEN! Love it when someone knows what they are talking about!
BiggerThinking1 6 months ago
@McLarenMercedes Citin Bergers 2 wins as evidence of the McLarens strength is disingenous - Bergers 2 wins were Canada and Australia - In Canada he inherited the win after Senna and Brundle ahead of him retired with mechanical failure - Brundle in fact almost won his only ever victory here (arguably he deserved it - he was faster than Schumacher that day) - thats how good the Benetton was! In Australia, again Berger inherited the win after Senna and Mansell crashed out WAAAAY ahead of him!
BiggerThinking1 6 months ago
@McLarenMercedes Also - you imply Berger was a B-grader like Johnny Herbert or Barrichello - as if him winning means a car is sensational - in fact Berger was VERY VERY fast - he won 10 GP (more than all but a handful of drivers in history).
You would be more honest quoting Johnny Herberts 2 wins in 95 as evidence of the MASSIVE superiority of the Schui's Benetton over the Williams
BiggerThinking1 6 months ago
@McLarenMercedes You are wrong, It was a terrible car! Berger only won both those races because Mansell, Patrese and Senna had DNF's in both, Berger was very lucky to win in Canada and Australia he had no competition from the Williams drivers and Senna his team leader.
kouzouka 5 months ago
@kouzouka terrible cars dont finish second in the constructors!!
flipsidedogchop 5 months ago
@flipsidedogchop Chop! If you tally up all Mansell's, Patrese's and even Schumi's DNF's you get 13 the same as Senna and Berger combined, it was a piece of shit while the Williams was brilliant with Mansel only ever finishing 1st or 2nd the entire season
kouzouka 5 months ago
@kouzouka but they still finished 2nd you retard! how the fuck is that shit?
The Coloni-Subaru was shit. . The MP4/7 wasnt
flipsidedogchop 5 months ago
What a horrid car that McLaren was... shame.
thylegion 8 months ago
@thylegion whaaat?? You call 2nd in the constructors horrid?!!
flipsidedogchop 8 months ago
Comment removed
thylegion 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@flipsidedogchop Compare that to MP4/6, and you'll have your answer. :/ Also you should read something about what Senna thought about this car, geeeez.
thylegion 8 months ago
@thylegion i asked you a question!
do you call 2nd in the constructors horrid?!
flipsidedogchop 8 months ago
@flipsidedogchop you heard me, boy! YES!
thylegion 8 months ago
@thylegion U didnt say YES! in your first comment so how could i hear you, boy?
5 wins.... 3 for Senna & 2 for Berger.... yes, what a totally shit car! fuck off!
flipsidedogchop 8 months ago
@flipsidedogchop "Compare that to MP4/6, and you'll have your answer" - that WAS an answer, you cheapshit! And don't tell me to fuck off, moron - you better go and read something what Senna had to say about that car. Not my fault that Berger and Senna managed to won some races with that car. Geeez, how old are you, to be so nervous about somebody having different opinion than yours, 12? Go to your momma, and tell her to fuck off, fuckfaced cocktwat.
thylegion 8 months ago
@thylegion well in your first comment you said MP4/4 ... Then said MP4/6.... Yea great answer!
hahahaha dont get so defensive or sensitive when im on the offensive
oh and fuck off!
flipsidedogchop 8 months ago
@flipsidedogchop That's why I deleted comment, geez. Lack of arguments, so you decided to go for a "picky" stuff, right? That's LOW, dude. Stupid fanboys. You're the Oxford grad.? Pffffff... more like lo-life faggot. Stupid motherfucker, having a problem with my different-than-his opinion, and now he says I AM defensive, wow... And by the way - "fuck off" was firstly used by you, so... enough said about your mother - she is whore, simply.
thylegion 8 months ago
@thylegion fuck that was funny....look how offended you got hahahahaha
cmon faggot i need a good laugh.. get offended again, cmon...
flipsidedogchop 8 months ago
@flipsidedogchop omfg, you're a laughable one, dude. Small penis owners aren't so cool afterall... Later. :)
thylegion 8 months ago
@thylegion dont talk about my fucking knob you faggot!
flipsidedogchop 7 months ago
@flipsidedogchop Now you're even more lulzy craphead :D Awww, did I hurt its little dick's feelings?
thylegion 7 months ago
@thylegion Your STILL talking about cock?!!
Fuck your a faggot! Fuck off! Polish faggot, we should have let the Nazis kill you all during the war and rape your mom!
flipsidedogchop 7 months ago
@flipsidedogchop That's the lowest comment I've ever read, geeeez, you're pathetic, dude o_O You should learn something about polish squadron 303, who actually help you, english fuckers, out during battle of britain. Forget it, you must be oxford drop out if you don't know BASICS about your own country history. Lame ass little dicked pussy-annoying McLaren-fanboy prick. Oh, and by the way, your mother is STILL dirty slut.
thylegion 7 months ago
@flipsidedogchop Damn, 3 weeks of peace and quiet, and you had to come back... jeeeeez, oxford fags are annoying.
thylegion 7 months ago
@flipsidedogchop I wonder why as smart person as you (LOL) won't reply with any sense to me saying "why don't you read what Senna had to say about that car", huh? I guess that would do the justice to me, and in the same time you would have to cry, because Senna also had different-than-yours opinion. DIE, motherfucker!
thylegion 8 months ago
@flipsidedogchop 27 year old immature moron.
thylegion 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@flipsidedogchop and AGAIN: " I wonder why as smart person as you (LOL) won't reply with any sense to me saying "why don't you read what Senna had to say about that car", " - go ahead, show me some real arguments.
thylegion 7 months ago
@flipsidedogchop Booooooy, that McLaren was horrid...
thylegion 7 months ago
0:25 you can hear Senna's Honda V12
ilferrari 8 months ago
God, how i miss Senna
gowdridge 8 months ago
that was the only way to overtake him.. corner cutting..
pafa92 9 months ago
he cut the chicane, he got an advantage and carried alot more speed through the straight
St19Gabriel 9 months ago
Best time with those V10 engines!
SynthieAl 9 months ago
still think that these cars are much better looking than present day machines and sound soooooo much better too. doesn`t progress suck sometimes?
gowdridge 10 months ago 13
@gowdridge
Agree!
At least about the progress on sound and looks!
It's a shame because theres no lack of excitement in F1! Since the mid 00's seasons have exceeded many of the seasons in the 90'es and early 00's!
BUT... the cars today really look like poor drawings from a drunk 3 year old!
It all could be so great...ad the close championship battles that we have seen the last 5 years, with the looks AND sound as good as those in the early 90's...that would be niiice! :-)
Michaelingolfhansen 8 months ago
@gowdridge I'm not sure there has been much progress Prost set a high speed record at Hockenheim in 1993 of just over 230mph in qualifying!
ssssroryssss 3 months ago
@ssssroryssss was talking about the progress from how the old cars looked and sounded, to present day machines, not how fast they could go..miss the sound of V10`s and V12`s,manual gear changes and the fact that they used to have grip. just reckon the racing isn`t as exciting as it used to be.
gowdridge 3 months ago
@gowdridge i totally agree, it seems that with progress, every golden age is followed systematically by an neutering period, a dulling down refinement of that golden age in accordance with unforeseen dangers, threats and peripheral developments. Hopefully in a few years we'll see more exciting cars than today's dead, lifeless ones
JontieDesario 1 month ago
back in the day was like this:Cut the corner if you dare and tell us how it was if you live after that.
Alexandru017 10 months ago
That's coz Williams at that time developed the system where the car automatically balances out through a corner
justinyau7595 10 months ago
@tamkukushka yes he did ..... ;) lol
rossiwilton 10 months ago
nowadays mansell would get a drive through penatly for cutting the chicane and gaining an adventage
kurwajegopierdolona 1 year ago 36
@kurwajegopierdolona yup,he would. also senna would o been black flagged 4 tryin 2 push mansell off circuit !!! lol
rossiwilton 10 months ago
@kurwajegopierdolona no he wouldnt hes overtaking a mclaren with a yellow helmet.
l0dgey 10 months ago
Comment removed
Binitec 10 months ago
@kurwajegopierdolona Rules were even stricter back then so be quiet, Senna got disqualified from the 1989 Japanese race for using the cut through after the collision with Prost.
MegaMrDamo 10 months ago
@kurwajegopierdolona i think he slipped
wtficantgetausername 9 months ago
@kurwajegopierdolona he didnt actually gain any advantage in that particular move, he didnt overtake senna with that move, so no, he wouldn't get penalised
MsDriftedSW 9 months ago
@kurwajegopierdolona Exactly. Sometimes I wonder how much time it will cost until Ecclestone invents the speed limit for F1.
MrLollyflop 9 months ago
@kurwajegopierdolona Mansell would probably get a drive through for cutting the chicane, and Senna would probably get a stop-go for weaving.
evilzzzable 6 months ago
@kurwajegopierdolona That would be fine if that's why he passed Senna. It was actually the draft that got him by...
lilbro209 6 months ago
@kurwajegopierdolona he did not gain a position , therefore he did nothing wrong . obvious mistake not cheating .
mushrume 5 months ago
@kurwajegopierdolona in fact, nigel mansell = lewis hamilton...
cb20051981 5 months ago
@cb20051981
in fact hamilton is a piece of shit near mansell,hamilton couldnt drive those cars.
poussyledzep 4 months ago
@poussyledzep I don't think so... he has driven those cars...
cb20051981 4 months ago
@poussyledzep hamilton would probably spin out because of the sheer power compared to the f1 cars of today
FPSyorkshire 4 months ago
@FPSyorkshire
Power is actually about the same as now! Most engines of 92-93 had 700-750 BHP! The engines today is about 750 BHP!
It's not the power levels that are wrong, it's the look, sound, and stupid things such as KERS!
And BTW: Hamilton won the GP2 with 600 bhp with VERY narrow rear tires (not super wide slicks like these...which are cooler)... but if you can control them you can control most cars!
Michaelingolfhansen 2 months ago
@Michaelingolfhansen and now look whats happened to hamilton
FPSyorkshire 2 months ago
@kurwajegopierdolona
nowadays f1 is shit,Mansell wouldn''t accept to drive under shit rules,Schumi accepts but he's suffering now cause he couldn't drive aggressively as he used to do in f1 last golden years.
poussyledzep 4 months ago
Senna was a dirty unfair driver, moving left and right
paddy9i99 1 year ago
he got sideways and cut the corner but is not bad
ninchin2 1 year ago
Formula boring is now ruined by the stupid rules.
SCRTpilot 1 year ago 3
No advantage for Mansell? For sure there was an advantage ;) Just think there wouldnt have been tarmac but gravel; he would have lost a few more seconds ;)
No discussion, mansell was faster and would have past senna without cutting chicanes too ;)
Its the same with Hamilton few years ago. Would there have been gravel or a wall, he wouldnt had past kimi.
And @bmwnasher: Todays rules a crap.
bamboootscha 1 year ago
tht was a great race and senna waved him past as i have the seasson on vidieo and it shws u senna wavein him past as mansell had the faster car
kentboydan 1 year ago
I don't think Mansell cut the chicane out of choice; the car fishtails under braking for Ostkurve, thus ending up too deep into the chicane to be able to make the second apex. Great era for F1 though. Senna & Mansell did have their run ins, but you could tell they had massive respect for each other.
5150UK 1 year ago
Comment removed
5150UK 1 year ago
No advantage from cutting the chicane at all, he was already all over the back of the McLaren. I loved this time, so many great names, great looking cars, innovation driven by the teams not the FIA and the racing was ok too.
Also is it me or does it just look so much more punishing for the drivers, old f1 races always look like they took place in baking heat!
MMediums 1 year ago
there was no advantage when mansell cut the corner..no drive through for that..even todays rules.get your facts right boys
bmwnasher 1 year ago
yeah but when you passed Senna you knew you were the real deal, he was so hard to pass
Looshbaby 1 year ago
The Williams-Renault was light years better than the McLaren-Honda in 1992. If you watch the race, Senna actually waves Nigel past.
Audioquest56 1 year ago 18
@Audioquest56
Where does he wave mansell past?
paddy9i99 1 year ago
@Audioquest56 Certainly a Senna's fanboy here. Get a life.
Abujamra2 1 year ago
@Abujamra2 WTF are you talking about noob? I was a huge Williams-Renault Patrese fan at the time. If you watch the entire race (which I have on video), Senna gives Nigel the wave through for a pass.
So, STFU.
Audioquest56 1 year ago
@Audioquest56 Yes, it was purely Senna's talent that he was even close in any of the races in '92. He quite rightly waved Mansell through as there was no way he way going to hold him off for very long and instead preserved his tires as best he could for a battle with Patrese for second.
tor378a 11 months ago
@tor378a Yes, I agree with you. Nigel was weaving back and forth like a maniac and Senna realized there was no way he was going to keep the Williams behind him. Of course, Senna did manage to hold off Patrese and force him into a spin on the corner to stadium section, thus finishing second.
Audioquest56 11 months ago
@Audioquest56 i rember it well watching it live
ROOSTER1067 11 months ago
AWESOME!
Of course if that had happened now Mansell would have been given a 25 second penalty for gaining an unfair advantage by drivong off the track, like Hammy on Raikonnen at Spa 08. 92 was AWESOME!
unicron2002 2 years ago
very good overtake mansell.
mackey12160204 2 years ago
Great vid. I love onboad footage of overtakes! Ahh the old Hockenheim circuit, sadly now gone and turned into a go kart circuit!!!
alphabetaxenonzzzcat 2 years ago
LOL...Yeah Great footage, too bad Nigel missed the chicane completely probably out of frustration. LOL Senna always did thet at Nigel. I can't imagine that pass counting?
porksniffer 2 years ago
yeah Nigel had such a run on him because he cut the chicane :s
RustyM74 2 years ago