CryEngine 3 New Screen Shots + CryEngine 3 Will Run Slightly Better On Ps3..!!!

[blondbassist]

PS3 Deserve to have better running games because they Have much better hardware that no body has taken the full advantage of yet, Evn the ps3 exclusives havn't.

I'm a 360 gamer and i feel sorry for PS3 and pc gamers since most dev's only make full potential of the lame 8GB of CPU from the 360 and then port it to ps3 regardless of the fact that PS3 has 50GB of CPU to play with..

[ToxicOsOk]

DVD's can't run 1080p, only 1080i (why multiplatform games look better and are played on the 360 at gaming conventions and such). Blu-Ray disks can run in 1080p(why the PS3 exclusives and games with separate engines look better on PS3) . Yes PC is better and always will be better then any console no matter what and make sure you know what your saying before you post it, don't just go around and post stuff that you have no knowledge about... stop trying to troll because no one like a troll +usuk

[dia8el]

abnother fake movie made by total fag

[comedyguy911]

Xbox360>PS3

Xbox360 = 9Million Registered Users

PS3 = 5Million

Enough Said. And yes, Crysis 2 will run a bit smoother with better lighting effects on PS3, but PC will blow both of them out the competition.

[kirasaviorkira]

360 has 4x anti alaising ps3 lacks it and has 0x enjoy the blurs on the edges of everything

[ToxicOsOk]

@kirasaviorkira anti-alaising depends on the game developers in most cases... look at gears of war and then look at god of war

[kirasaviorkira]

@ToxicOsOk i kno i was kind  of stupid when i posted that comment but pc woops both of em :)

[waddlerobloxxxx]

the 360 has better shaders...while the PS3 runs smoother.

Btw the PS3 explosions look like crap

[Cod4soilder2]

if ps3 will be so mutch better so tell me why its always xbox the trailers and gameplays are beeing shown on......

[ToxicOsOk]

@Cod4soilder2 multiplatform games are made for 360 and then sort of over to ps3, 360 games can only play at 1080i at most while ps3 games can play at true 1080p

[sereda008]

half of those are cryengine2.

[Kiiiizle]

oh yeah and LOL @ the poster saying it will run slightly better on ps3 just to stirr up shit..................fag

[Kiiiizle]

It WILL run best on the pc obviously but in regards to consoles which ever one it runs better on, I think we can agree that no other game on these consoles will ever look as good again, kinda shows the console life times almost up probz 2 year max left.

[naitsabex]

they are not awesome pictures.

[KingTitus18]

this picture are not NEW ! ! !

[DjDiablock]

Thats Fake!

Just 0:26 screenshot is stolen , and this is Cryengine 2

[mupp33n]

HAHA, half of these pictures are from Crysis 1.

[Veggie449]

"Will run better on PS3"

As if, the PC version will be the best lol!

[ToxicOsOk]

@Veggie449 PC version only depends on your computer :D mine can't even run css so i'm stuck with a console ):

[1986wumpscut]

It's funny how all Xbox 360 / PS3 fans were saying Crysis sucks, without playing it, but now they'll all excited over Crysis 2. 0:25 is NOT from CE3. 0:00 to 0:30 are CE2, after that it's CE3.

[ThyAssautical]

Crysis is the best gaming experience I have ever played. Especially if you have the pc to run it on at least very hgh settings.

[1986wumpscut]

I totally agree. I don't understand why people hate on it's gameplay. It genuinely felt innovative to me. I mean it had a fairly generic story, admittingly annoying hit detection, ect, but theres something hilariously awesome about pretending to be a tree by picking up one after you've shot it to peices. :P

[Assblaster93]

Looks great.

[elchicoargento]

when i saw the first video the both version looks the same and the both versions works the same i saw no diference.

[StatusQuo209]

0:24 to 0:29 and the one from 0:55 were NOT screens from cryengine 3

[Brygelsmack]

The first four pics are not CE 3 either.

[no3011]

0:29 is from cryengine 3

they showed the screen earlier in a offical trailer

[CHUPAKANIPA]

there going to push ps3 to its limits in an interview same for xbox360 yay only company that push ps3 was guerilla but they are a console exclusive company so this awesome news crysis 2 will be better probably cus it sbrighter and will have better controls.

[XXXSpartan118XXX]

No it wont. The 360 and Ps3 will be the same. Guerilla wasnt the only ones to push it limits. Naughty Dog was and long before that was MGS. learn the facts first. The Xbox controller would work better and if theirs multiplayer Live would win.

[CHUPAKANIPA]

well to bad i wasn't comparing xbox 360 and ps3 asshole i was comparing killzone 2 and crysis 2.

[XXXSpartan118XXX]

Crysis 2 still looks better anyway so it doesnt matter.

[XXXSpartan118XXX]

BTW you werent comparing Killzone to it. no where in there did it say Killzone 2. you were saying they are gonna push both consoles limits and Guerilla was the only one too and i said they werent. read then reply.

[CHUPAKANIPA]

i forgot to put in the words than killzone 2 ass!

[ToxicOsOk]

@XXXSpartan118XXX don't say anything about the controller because the majority of my friends that have both 360's and ps3's say they prefer the ps3 controller... they like live more then psn but wish the xbox had a smaller controller

[DeathbatMX]

With Xbox Live and the 360 controller, the Xbox version still looks to be better...

[COG287]

crytek has said that the ps3 can run cryengine3 better because the cell is perfect for the engines multi-threading capabilities

[Gregoses]

CE2 for pc is almost the same like CE3 for consoles, but only for the eye. It has better physics and such, but these screens(not all of them, some are from the presentation video) are from mods in CE2. I got a "prewiev" of CE3 in PDF that Crytek made and these screens are on the end of it and it is written there, that its from these mods.

[Vespidiant]

lol at all of them looking worse than cryengine 2 on pc

[Skipan2]

and on gpu side the ps3 has the higher frequency but

it's the same thing again.

it has 24 pixelshader pipelines and 8 vertexshader pipelines while the xbox gpu has 48 unified-shader which can do all calculations.

and rsx doesn't support 16-bit hdrr and antialising at the same time.

+ the 128bit interface is to slow for antialising on high res.

thats why only 4 games have 4xAA on the ps3 while the xbox has 30.

do you know what i want to say?

not that the 360is faster but more effectively

[MrJamez007]

hmm do you agree with my suggestion that maybe when Cevat Yerli comments that the ps3 version will run better he means by framerates for a comprimise of visuals?

[Skipan2]

he never said it will run better.

the ps3 will run better here and the 360 will run better there.

it will look probably the same

[TacoTown241]

Hold UP DAwg! ANd I Qoute " will run slightly better on the PS# " nuff Said. DoNe DeAl, ClOsed CASe, WaTer Under the Birgde, CoW oVer the Moon!

[Skipan2]

the ps3 all in all can be faster than a xbox360.

but the complexity is extreme.

while the xbox has 3PPEs which are easy to use the ps3 has 1PPE and 6 active SPEs for games. SPEs have no acces to the ram. they have 256kb cache so no developer can make a systemcode bigger than 256kb. there is no common memory between SPEs and SPE cannot access the PPEs main memory.

cell may be faster then xenon but no developer that works on 3 platforms will have so much time to use that thing effective

[reggae1188]

your outdated man i got nothing against you but SPE's are not a coprocessor they are full general processor and operates independently from other processors and also can send codes directly to the PPU fast. also game developers should not treat the SPE's special. also they don't have to worry about the memory since the memory is nearby and it runs fast so 256 is already enough or should i say still to much.

[Skipan2]

sure the SPE memory is fast but 256kb are still 1/10000 of that what a developer is inured on the PPE.

and SPEs can't connect to the PPE memory directly.

it's the other way round

[Skipan2]

@reggae1188

one tipp

you should read the spu case study from guerrilla for the game developers conference.

it's very intresting

the updated time on PPU is 20x times faster

and the SPU postprocessing assist on rsx creates a constant lag of 1/30 cause SPU image operations are done while rsx is already rendering the next frame.

but the stuff they did on SPUs are really incredible.

ai,collision,physic,particlesi­mulation/rendering,light probes etc.

[reggae1188]

well the information that I used was from the devs of god of war 3 it's intersting you should google it also im gonna check out that stuffs from guerilla.

[MrJamez007]

hmmm give developers sum time to make deal with the complexity besides devs got a year more experience developing with xbox

[xDEADLOCKEDx2468]

Title of the video is WRONG! Cryengine 3 will run A LOT better on a PC.

[KILLERWSYAN]

im talking about the consoles!

and please read the discription before posting anything

the title i've put on this video was from cevat yeril himself, alright

[xDEADLOCKEDx2468]

Yea I read your description, it didn't say anything about what runs better or whatever

[KILLERWSYAN]

well read the whole interview dude " Yerli went on to describe how the engine is being built to perform across platforms. "The CE3 runs currently at more or less the same quality bar. I say more or less because the engine still optimizes itself to power of the platforms' intrinsics. So the PS3 will run slightly better here, it'll look and feel probably the same, but the engine is diverting computation needs to power subsystems available to the PS3, and the 360 differently, and PC differently "

[Skipan2]

and by the way i never said the 360 is better

[KILLERWSYAN]

you've said insomecases the xbox has adavantages the gpu has more shadaers/transistors

and the cpu has 3PPEs while cell has only 1 and 6SPEs

from that i can get you're trying to say 360 is better

well we will see about that when crysis 2 come out

[Skipan2]

yeah in SOME cases

in other cases the ps3 has advantages

like the higher ram bandwith or the higher clock frequency of the gpu.

[heydude09876]

@KILLERWSYAN hes right about the CPU tho...

[reggae1188]

are you nuts PC is not considered as a console "it will run slightly better on a PS3" means that he's comparing it to the 360. and yes PC is more powerful than those 2 just to make you happy

[KILLERWSYAN]

OMG thnk you dude thats what i've ment from this video

finlay someone understand me

[xDEADLOCKEDx2468]

Weirdos............ -.-

[mortalbos7]

hey man sorry abot that commet i ddint what to post that to you

[mortalbos7]

youll see xbox 360 cant handle cryengie 3 and yeah im an comp nut so i know evrything even if they make cryengie 3 on xbox360 it will be with bichy graphices so yeah you dont know anything about hardware thats why you listen to an fucking interview i in the other hand you my mind

[reggae1188]

360 can handle the graphics but the ps3 will look better cuz of it's processing power, like for shadows and lighting stuffs like that.

[mortalbos7]

hey man let me tell you something how the hell do you thing ce3 is going to be on a fucking x360 only on the ps3 and pc but not x360 the x360 graphices can now with stand ce2 let alone ce3

[Skipan2]

when you dumbfuck would have any idea of hardware or maybe just watched the interview with cevat yerli you would know that the xbox gpu has more transistors than rsx(30million more) and more shaders which are also flexbible=more graphical performance while cell is able to do more physic calculations etc.

and during a ps3 devkit run with ce3 the spe and gpu usage is already at the maximum

[reggae1188]

already at the maximum? it's not just about graphics, but also the processing power, and by the way RSX are built together with the cells w/c has also a graphics unit in each. also everyone knows that the ps3 has powerful processing power but if it's already at maximum how could it run on the 360 without downgrading some details? though the graphics doesn't have any problems but for the environment you need a lot of processing power on that.

[Skipan2]

don't ask me

google it

Cevat Yerli said it during an interview

cell&rsx are at the maximum

and also

in some cases the xbox has adavantages.

the gpu has more shadars/transistors

and the cpu has 3PPEs while cell has only

1 and 6SPEs(SPEs suck in my opinion) for games.

and there is no graphiccalculation on cell in multiplatformgames. exclusives like kz2 use postprocessing,particle rendering,light probes etc. but no multiplatformgame.

[KILLERWSYAN]

dude stfu

im one of the biggest fans for cevat yerli

cryengine 3 will work on ps3 better than 360

you just say that because you have 360 and you dont have a ps3

i've read everythign about cryengine 3 and havnt read that the cell & rsx ganna use maximum power for ps3

aculty you dont know anything about the ps3

saying xbox360 is better than ps3 is laughable dude

its enough that the ps3 is newer than the 360 andps3have blu-ray wich its better than HD dvd

[Skipan2]

actually i don't give a shit about both console versions as i'm going to play the pc version.

Cevat Yerli clearly stated that

"The interesting thing is we did run a performance analysis on the PS3 devkit, and you know the funny thing is the occupation on all the CPUs, the Cell and the GPUs, is pretty much the needle is at the limit."

yeah you are very informed...

[DoNultima]

I hope you know that each SPE can render graphics like a GPU? SPEs are always faster than PPEs. and in Gaming, a SPE Is much, I reapt MUCH more effective. nearly twice, and thats even ignorign the fact that they can render graphics. And the PS3's GPU shits over the 360's. Twice the Texels, twice the Gigasamples, 10% faster frequencies and even double the FLOP count. And with the Cell Engine rendering The Playstation3 is blows the 360 off the water. And PS3 has 2 TFlops (2X) The Performance

[Skipan2]

guerilla is the only developer that used SPEs for rendering.

and when you render with SPEs and gpu there is always a 1frame "lag" cause the gpu is starting to render a frame and cell must wait till rendering finished. that it can do postprocessing or whatever.

did you noticed how blurry kz2 is or when you aim very fast you see 2 visors

and btw theoretical cell has 200gflops (2X is right)

but it always depends on the benchmark.

during linpack it only gots 23,5gflops

before optimizinh it got 0,26

[XXXSpartan118XXX]

LOl then whyy does the game look the same in any scenario? Bioshock,Gta,DMC,BF etc all look the same on both consoles.

[Brygelsmack]

The pic at 0:29 is taken by me and it's definitely not from CE3.

[moebius1994]

Yes it is. You see the same place in the cryengine 3 trailer.

[Brygelsmack]

No, it's NOT. The picture is from Seith's Little Island, a well-known CE 2 map made with the EDITOR that comes with Crysis.

I TOOK THE BLOODY PICTURE.

[GroenWild]

This is AWESOME! And this is really the Cry Engine 3. it was on the E3 in LA yesterday!

[NiNm62]

theyre all from cryengine2 with modified tods (those and the pictures can be found on crymod) and screen caps from the cry3 trailer

the cry3 looks different on each system, 360 has better shadows for example, while the ps3 has more cpus which physics could benefit from

[Maidus385]

Slightly run better on ps3 but in lowest graphics.

[PcGamer4ever1]

U R Right.

[Benny2503]

? grow up fanboy

[xentro01]

lol ultra high setting on crysis warhead still looks an awfull lot better than this.

[Skipan2]

most of those screenshots are made with cryengine 2 and pc...

i'm keep looking in modding portals everyday and the first picture is made by a member of crymod.

0:23 shows a tod modifikation made by crymod member "Hawkeye|Puppy"

0:14/0:56/0:18 are pre alpha picture of cryengine 2

when you look at the name of the window in 1:00 you see it's called

"raw_pc.cry - sandbox2"

actually only the gdc video shows reliable material.

[KILLERWSYAN]

dude these pics wee talking from Crytek(dot)com

check out the link @ the description

i know som pic are for ce2

i think its 0:23 & 1:00 thats the only pics were from ce2

[KILLERWSYAN]

and you can download the CryENGINE® 3 features document in PDF format

the 2nd link, its awesome btw :)

[sapernt300]

Oh and this is fake

[KILLERWSYAN]

why dont yuo stfu ps3 is better than 360 relly dude im not a fanboy and ididnt say this video is a battle or w\e ill just give you 1 reason that the ps3 is better (KILLZONE 2)

oh and if you think is fake,so just dont watch it and wasting my time to reply on your stupid comment,ok =)

[1994german1994]

but its easier to optimize the xbpx 360 than the ps3 so the graphic isn't so good on ps3 and it does lag somtimes.

[Benny2503]

and it doesnt lag on gears of war ? lol you fail all consoles get alittle lag

[KILLERWSYAN]

consoles doesnt lag they are setup

they lags if theres a big explosion like in far cry 2

if you put many barrels an ammo stock. it will lag

but in the gameplay!

nope

[KILLERWSYAN]

dude its true if you dont belive me check out the link and theres pics its from IGN!

and why not this is not pissible..! aculty cryengine 2 looks like that too! and maybe better

[alexito20011]

dude 0:24 looks like a photo

[81giorikas]

better then post a link direct to the interview and not to what rumors the fanboys at psu start to spread...couldn't find it. I certainly don'trust psu!!!

[KILLERWSYAN]

ok then go to another link ! its IGN not fan site you know -_-

[81giorikas]

whta would you expect from psu really?

tell me you own a ps3 and kinda hate the xbox360 dontcha? enjoy the game...though

[KILLERWSYAN]

dude why do i hate xbox 360 so im a fanboy! im just telling the truth!

the both are awesome anyway