I hate to piss on your parade but a 56 has alot less tractive effort than a 66! A 56 would not cope with the load out of peak forest of a 66. A 66 was never intended to out-do a 60. Its a mixed traffic work horse and does what it was designed to do well. The build qaulity is shit but they got us out of a hole as all our stuff was clapped out and life expired.
66 is 409 kilonewtons max TE, or in old money, over 91'000 pounds. Continuous TE is over 58'000 lbs. If I remember correctly, a 56 produces a mere 55'000 lbs max starting TE. Im just going by the figures I see!! A 66 has a lower max speed hence the higher TE as its geared lower. Its always been common knowledge that a shed is between a 56 and 60 in terms of haulage capacity. A 66/6 is close to a 60.
Yes, your exactly right on that count if only the railway was run for the benefit of trainspotters. Unfortunately they are not, they are run as a bussiness and a 56 is an expensive liability from a bussiness point of view! Thats why we have lots of 66's and not many 56's! Another reason why EMD are all over the world, they are just so dam reliable compared with anything else.
Well said. This great achive footage is showing the sight and sound of a real loco. Its sad to admit but I really miss the grids and after they got withdrawn, I lost nearly all my interest in the railways. They were far more entertaining than a 66 any day. Who cares what class has more power.
i think its hilarious they withdrew the grids when EWS could have refurbished them n got another 10-15 years work outta them, n now theyve run the 60's into the ground but have had to keep 10 going cos the "o so great" 66's aren't powerful enough to haul the stone upto peak forest
I tataly agree, I think that the 60's and 56's should be the main freight locos in the Uk, well the amin heavy freight locos, cos they could easily improve the 56's and 60's fuel consumption by fitting new equptment, but the 60's do have a low fuel consumption anyway, But I think the only downside to the 56's are they do have a lower tractiv effort than the 66's which may reduce their haulage capacity and make the 66's more powerfull, but never the less who knows what will hapen.
ruston paxman once owned the old english electric works at newton le willows, this is where they made the RKI63CT engines as used in the 56`s,the paxman valenta used in the HST`S was a v12 and i am certain they was made in colchester,what gave both engines a similar sound was the napier turbos,formidable 38 is right the 56 engine is based on the 16CSVT units from class 50`s, also made at the vulcan foundry newton le willows when owned by english electric
You are all missing the point. The similarity in the sound of HSTs and 56s is nothing to do with the engine (and the engines have nothing at all in common bar starter motors), it is entirely to do with turbos.
HSTs originally used a Napier SA-084, and most 56s used Napier SA-085s. The scream is from the turbos and the similar turbos make a similar noise.
A Brown Boveri fitted 56 sounds nothing like an HST, and not much like a Napier fitted 56.
This is true. Because if you fitted an MTU turbo set to a valenta (for example) then in reality it would pretty much be like a VP185 or something between the two. All the froth is just turbo scream, lordz ;)
Doncaster, Good Friday 1999. One of these tearing through pulling a load of empty HAAs. The noise was indescribable and my fillings rattled! Dreadful!
Sprog, you seriously consider yourself the resident expert on railways don't you? You are really a pathetic timewaster with FAR too much time on his hands.
Sprog, I have really got better things to do than argue with you, and this is the last reply I send to any comments you make (at least on this video). No-one likes a smart arse, and I'm not as much of a freak as you are, considering you seem to know every last detail about every component of every engine.
Better things to do aye!? Like what????? Masturbate??
You really are a complete & total gorm.
I think you will find that alot of people, except idiotic train spotters & keyboard warriors on YouTube, like me.
I am simply mechanically minded & i have an IQ rating higher than a 2 year old, which isnt really tricky when you consider it, although this is YOU we are talking about i suppose.
these monsters used to keep me awake at night taking empty HAA`S east, once clear of earlestown curve , the drivers would open them up fine style, total HELLFIRE
Proper freight locos.
HSTHoward 10 months ago
See that V shaped exhaust cloud at 1:25, thats his Professional Driving policy in full swing.
TheSlash21 11 months ago
None of the original batch of 56's from Electroputere survived?
Amazingly Electroputere still mention the 56's they made on their Web site.
A little susprising, given that BR had problems with them.
NJPurling 11 months ago
A proper locomotive!
bikerarni 11 months ago
brilliant footage
keytesofessex 1 year ago
Awesome
MrStapletonRoad 1 year ago
Awesome Grid Action!!
okotokspaul 1 year ago
Before the days of that big ugly footbridge??
MickeyLove01 2 years ago
Beastly, very beastly indeed :)
zombiesonacid 2 years ago
horsepower at rail - class 56 = 3250. class 66 = 3000. Top speed - class 56 = 80mph. class 66 = 75mph.
Sight and sound. Class 56 = Brilliant. Class 66 = crap.
tmayco 2 years ago 13
@tmayco That's progress.............apparently!
baconsandwich2007 1 year ago
@tmayco Unfortunately you mixed up some data.
Class 66 gets 3000 hp to the rail, the engine has 3300.
The 56 had a 3250 hp engine but only got 2400 to the rail.
Also, the 66 has more traction than the 56 - up to 408 kN during launch compared to 275 kN, continuous 260 kN vs 240 kN.
I totally agree with you about the looks though.
TheValKBawz 11 months ago
Sweet grid vid :)
Wikkus 2 years ago
I cant stop watching 56 vids, they are the best sound I have ever heard, but the 60's are up there with them 2
EWS60500 2 years ago
56 and 66 have comparable tractive effort, horsepower and the same top speed.
Not only on paper, but when it comes to hauling coal. The load restrictions for both a 56 and a 66 on a Lindsey oil train is 2700 tonnes I believe.
grannyjone 2 years ago
Comment removed
formidable38 2 years ago
I hate to piss on your parade but a 56 has alot less tractive effort than a 66! A 56 would not cope with the load out of peak forest of a 66. A 66 was never intended to out-do a 60. Its a mixed traffic work horse and does what it was designed to do well. The build qaulity is shit but they got us out of a hole as all our stuff was clapped out and life expired.
formidable38 2 years ago
So your saying a 66 is somewhere between a 56 and a 60 in terms of haulage?
Never known a 66 handle anything that a 56 couldnt
I've seen both classes hauling up to around 2600 tonnes but rarely anything more.
The acceleration of a 56 on an MGR also appears to be slightly faster than a 66 on the same train.
grannyjone 2 years ago
66 is 409 kilonewtons max TE, or in old money, over 91'000 pounds. Continuous TE is over 58'000 lbs. If I remember correctly, a 56 produces a mere 55'000 lbs max starting TE. Im just going by the figures I see!! A 66 has a lower max speed hence the higher TE as its geared lower. Its always been common knowledge that a shed is between a 56 and 60 in terms of haulage capacity. A 66/6 is close to a 60.
formidable38 2 years ago
Class 56's are far more interesting than Class 66's - that's what matters. 66's are so boring in every way, the Class 56's have character.
kevatcrewe 2 years ago 4
Yes, your exactly right on that count if only the railway was run for the benefit of trainspotters. Unfortunately they are not, they are run as a bussiness and a 56 is an expensive liability from a bussiness point of view! Thats why we have lots of 66's and not many 56's! Another reason why EMD are all over the world, they are just so dam reliable compared with anything else.
formidable38 2 years ago
Well said. This great achive footage is showing the sight and sound of a real loco. Its sad to admit but I really miss the grids and after they got withdrawn, I lost nearly all my interest in the railways. They were far more entertaining than a 66 any day. Who cares what class has more power.
tmayco 2 years ago
i think its hilarious they withdrew the grids when EWS could have refurbished them n got another 10-15 years work outta them, n now theyve run the 60's into the ground but have had to keep 10 going cos the "o so great" 66's aren't powerful enough to haul the stone upto peak forest
linbeef08 2 years ago 2
I tataly agree, I think that the 60's and 56's should be the main freight locos in the Uk, well the amin heavy freight locos, cos they could easily improve the 56's and 60's fuel consumption by fitting new equptment, but the 60's do have a low fuel consumption anyway, But I think the only downside to the 56's are they do have a lower tractiv effort than the 66's which may reduce their haulage capacity and make the 66's more powerfull, but never the less who knows what will hapen.
EWS60500 2 years ago
DRS and GBRf should just buy about 50 of them and then compete with EWS and Freightliner for a load of coal traffic.
Now that would be hellfire
grannyjone 2 years ago
Pure beastage!
Verbs2007 3 years ago 2
I want a 56!! ;-(
TheSlash21 3 years ago 2
That was a familiar site...end of shift and dropping off at the end of the platform after a hard days graft..thanks for the great footage..
jonny7england 3 years ago
Proper Engine, Proper Driver - Proper Railway :-D No messing about
TheSlash21 3 years ago 2
Love to see one of these in Freigtliner livery!
Yownanymous 4 years ago
Same engine as an HST. Close your eyes and that could be an HST and vice versa.
Kidderminsterharrier 4 years ago
You are joking, right??
Its a Ruston v16RKT, its origins are actualy from the class 50 lump, infact the block is nearly identical. The 2 Napier turbo's give it the racket.
formidable38 4 years ago
still sounded brilliant though!!! :>
loonies125 4 years ago
ruston paxman once owned the old english electric works at newton le willows, this is where they made the RKI63CT engines as used in the 56`s,the paxman valenta used in the HST`S was a v12 and i am certain they was made in colchester,what gave both engines a similar sound was the napier turbos,formidable 38 is right the 56 engine is based on the 16CSVT units from class 50`s, also made at the vulcan foundry newton le willows when owned by english electric
bikerarni 4 years ago
VP185s were made in colchester. Not sure about the Valentas.
class313 3 years ago
You are all missing the point. The similarity in the sound of HSTs and 56s is nothing to do with the engine (and the engines have nothing at all in common bar starter motors), it is entirely to do with turbos.
HSTs originally used a Napier SA-084, and most 56s used Napier SA-085s. The scream is from the turbos and the similar turbos make a similar noise.
A Brown Boveri fitted 56 sounds nothing like an HST, and not much like a Napier fitted 56.
teadrinker56 3 years ago
This is true. Because if you fitted an MTU turbo set to a valenta (for example) then in reality it would pretty much be like a VP185 or something between the two. All the froth is just turbo scream, lordz ;)
class313 3 years ago
Yes...same as HST....right =S
Seriously man, some people need know there stuff before posting.
Same sodding engine.... *rolls eyes*
Sprog030 3 years ago
Hellfire! An almost 47 looking HST :P
Good Video 5*
madplanefan 4 years ago
Doncaster, Good Friday 1999. One of these tearing through pulling a load of empty HAAs. The noise was indescribable and my fillings rattled! Dreadful!
fleagle6 4 years ago
Good God, it sounds like a HST! Yeah, I dunno why EWS don't use them. They're just as practical as 37s.
Yownanymous 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ERM..no they are not......=S
Fucking jackass.
Sprog030 3 years ago
Sprog, you seriously consider yourself the resident expert on railways don't you? You are really a pathetic timewaster with FAR too much time on his hands.
Yownanymous 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I know a dam site more than you, you fucking moron.
Sprog030 3 years ago
Well stop slagging everyone else off and pretending to be the ultimate fountain of all wisdom.
Yownanymous 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
And the fact that you have replied to me within 20mins of me posting my commet shows how much of a FREAK you are.
Iam not slagging anyone off. I am stating a fact. You are a fucking retard.
I am not a fountain of wisdo you fucking dickhead, i am simply correcting you becuase you are FUCKING WRONG.
A hellfire, mental, wanktasitc 12RP200L is NOTHING like RKI63CT. Totally differant, apart from both being ENGINES!!
Get your facts stright before you start frothing you fucking inbred CUNT.
Sprog030 3 years ago
Sprog, I have really got better things to do than argue with you, and this is the last reply I send to any comments you make (at least on this video). No-one likes a smart arse, and I'm not as much of a freak as you are, considering you seem to know every last detail about every component of every engine.
Yownanymous 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
LOL.
Better things to do aye!? Like what????? Masturbate??
You really are a complete & total gorm.
I think you will find that alot of people, except idiotic train spotters & keyboard warriors on YouTube, like me.
I am simply mechanically minded & i have an IQ rating higher than a 2 year old, which isnt really tricky when you consider it, although this is YOU we are talking about i suppose.
Love & Kisses,
Sprog
Sprog030 3 years ago
cool vid mate
Donald161093 4 years ago
Lovely
skwales100 4 years ago
Thankyou for this vid - its brill
Nightm00ds 4 years ago
I wish I was a driver back in the 90's, unfortunately the most powerfull thing I get to drive is a poxy 333 electric :(
Bring back loco haul - all is forgiven!
Paulsimon8 4 years ago
dreadful,what top-class traction.
chrisj94 4 years ago
these monsters used to keep me awake at night taking empty HAA`S east, once clear of earlestown curve , the drivers would open them up fine style, total HELLFIRE
bikerarni 4 years ago
Dont we all Jim 40,thank feck for Fastline eh?
jackiejayetv 4 years ago
What a beast. I miss Grids. :o(
jim40135 5 years ago