@cokenpepsi484 I'd be more enticed to watch if Schweizer wasn't called out for making shit up about: Pelosi, Franken, And Gore. Especially Pelosi, regarding her and Unions.
stating facts about politians being hypocrites is not an attack. It seems like the left is oversensitive to anything that shows the truth of their own behavior. Instead of denying these peoples behavior why not acknowledge the issue
What? Supremacy clause? That is new world order, as far as 9/11 truther I don't even know who those people are. George Bush Sr. Mentioned New World Order, Henry Kissinger mentioned it and even the current administration mentioned the phrase World Order. Human Rights mandates? That's humanist NWO, they don't have the authority to determine what is and is not a human right.
They mentioned a "New World Order" because the Soviet Union no longer existed dumbass.
What's even more pathetic is how you don't even realize the Supremacy Clause is from the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Do yourself a favor and look up "Supremacy Clause" into Wikipedia.
Since the US has to honor it's treaties, it has to honor the UN Charter.
@AndroidPolitician Henry Kissinger mentioned the New World Order about Obama smart one.
The U.S. Constitution does not recognize any foreign national documents. And you call me names, you don't have a clue what you're talking about. The Declaration of Independence broke away from the British charter, so of course we don't have to honor any foreign charter.
@AndroidPolitician Your response is just plain moronic...apparently you don't know how to finish reading.
"and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." It doesn't say anything about all other nations in the world.
I notice you don't have a thing to say about Kissinger and Obama either. You must be an android. Here's a tip, get a better programmer.
Um yes it does? What do you think "and all treaties made, or which shall be made" means? Yes it's saying judges in the country are bound to uphold those laws and treaties.
I think Kissinger is a war criminal and Obama is pretty mediocre. I don't fault politicians for saying "New World Order" especially when it's in the context of the Soviet Union falling apart or something else.
@AndroidPolitician It means within the U.S.A.!!! Not the world!! That's nuts! The Founders never asserted such a thing because that is complete asinine.
@AndroidPolitician You should be sorry for being plain moronic, by the way what you call the "supremacy clause" is actually called Article. VI. You should have your programmer telly you sorry for not incoding the truth "Android" you're plain brain washed by some NWO Sociopaths. Your first argument 2 weeks ago, was that "the Supremacy Clause which combined with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights kind of mandates it." This never happened! Article VI was never combined with anything.
@AndroidPolitician And no, the Founders never signed a "treaty" with other foreign nations "combining" Article VI with some humanist mandates by which they gave up portions of their sovereignty to follow. Which is exactly what would have to happen to join such a "mandate". You're a proponent of the World Order. Not the sovereignty of individual nations...you are NWO.
@AndroidPolitician First, single payer health-care is Socialist, but the Kyoto Protocol is NWO. So to give you the benefit of the doubt, if indeed the "majority" want single-payer health-care, then the majority are Socialist. If the majority want the Kyoto Protocol, then the majority are NWO. If the majority want both, then they are New World Socialists.
The best part is when they try to interview Michael Moore, this movie gives it right back to him and every other hypocritical liberal out there. To: Daaremikkel, Obviously Nancy Pelosi isn't taking climate change seriously since she owns a vineyard in the Napa Valley. It takes a whole lot of water and insecticide to keep the wine presses running. Do you think she pays those working hands $20 an hour too?
Another blatant example of "let us put our collective heads in the sand" and pretend that climate change is a non-issue. I fear that we will pay a dear price for our failure to deal with excessive greenhouse gas emissions and global warming.
The difference is the liberal movie doesn't attack the person but the message. The conservative movie attacks the person and doesn't talk about the topics being discussed. They don't have an argument so they resort to ad hom's.
That's funny.Because all the moonbat flims I've seen,they go right after the person.Comrade Moore going to Heston's home and the such isn't attacking a person?You have double standards,but that's ok.You are a liberal who only wants a liberal world.Hail Stalin,right commerade?
Asking a person some pointed questions about a subject isn't attacking a person, but I wouldn't expect a right wing nutjob to understand that distinction.
So a liberal calling someone a "fag",a "kike",hitting a person,and choking a person isn't attacking them?And how am I a nutjob?I am just pointing out that the gentleman is making the same type of film Michael Moore would make and yet you call double standards.I just want to know where this comes from?
Wow, now you resort to making shit up. Exactly where did anyone call anyone a "fag" or "kike?" Does it take work to be this ignorant?
That's just it, it's not the same type of movie that Michael Moore makes, and since it seems to be beyond your understanding as to what the difference is then I think I'm wasting my time even talking to you.
I'm not going to get in the middle of this spat...but isn't calling him an "right-wing nut job" attacking the opponent and not the issue. "Hail Stalin" isn't much better. So what I'm saying is: You guys are never going to accomplish anything by bantering on youtube; the anonymity prevents any real stride toward a greater future.
You're a typical left-wing douchebag moron. The Kennedys, Al Gore and other rich liberals don't need to make a living - they were born into enormous wealth thanks to the capitalist system they so despise. The point here is that they want to use government coercion to force average, middle class Americans to live a certain way which will actually decrease their standard of living while they themselves do whatever the hell they want, often in complete contradiction to what they preach.
I didn't know who Haggard was until libs started making such a big deal about him. Did Haggard ever hold any public office? Was he ever hailed as a genius and given an Oscar like Moore? Did he ever give millions to campaigns and extremist groups like Soros? We all have weaknesses, but there's a difference betw. private issues and making public policy for everyone. If Al Gore is going to tax me for turning on my lights I expect him not to have a carbon footprint the size of Rhode Island.
Just to clarify, this isn't a "right-wing film." Ted Haggard doesn't escape criticism from us. In fact he opens the film, along with several other examples of conservative hypocrisy.
@AndroidPolitician Even Bill Clinton spoke pro-minority rights. So then what about the rest of the 30%? America is freedom of choice, and single payer removes it.
@AndroidPolitician A private insurance company cannot simply not pay for it if it is in your coverage. Also, you already have medicare. And this administration wants to fine someone for not accepting Government health-care, that's not freedom of choice.
So your defense is "well that's how private companies work"?
Medicare and medicaid don't cover middle class families who might have the misfortune of getting a serious illness like cancer and then getting dropped because of it.
@AndroidPolitician That's a claim you make. But it's law that if you have the proper coverage they can't drop you. What about car insurance? If I get into a debilitating accident that far exceeds what I can afford, then what? Force auto insurance for all? What about house insurance? College insurance? It only stops with forced medical insurance based on your say so? Then the Government fines you for not accepting it? That's commy garbage.
Single payer health-care is socialism and forced charity is no charity at all.
I defend freedom of choice, and not placing a tax burden on people. This nation was never setup to fund a sole health-care financial system by tax payer dollars. And people were in need of more medical care back during the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, and they still didn't put this burden on the people!
What about house & car insurance, do we have to pay that for you too?
Private insurance is a bigger tax burden because thousands of people die in the ER for being uninsured and then hospitals use tax dollars to pay for them.
What's funny is that about 70% of Americans favor what you call evil socialism. Care to explain that one?
@AndroidPolitician It's not Constitutional. And I don't believe 70% of America wants Socialism. Watch Nov 2010 and then 2012 and we'll see how many people want Socialism.
Oh I'm sorry, did I miss the single-payer referendum which if the majority votes on will implement single-payer health care nationwide?
The reason why people don't "vote on it" is because it's not an option, count the number of politicians who support single-payer and compare it to how many are needed to get it done.
@AndroidPolitician Obviously not since their representatives aren't voting for it, and many Democrat Governed states are now Republican just from the midterms alone.
I meant the number of politicians ever, there's was like 10 democrats and one republican who supported it in both the house and senate despite the support of the majority of the American people.
The problem is that you're using people voting on politicians as a measure of democracy when I'm using the actual opinions of the American people.
@AndroidPolitician But look at what happen with the opinions of the American people, they simply didn't vote into office those Politicians who promote a Socialist taxpayer funded single payer health-care system. If those polls are in anyway accurate, then why did so many states turn Republican?
It's called a protest vote, the economy means the people in power get voted out.
It would be kind of odd to assume 2/3rds American people thinking that the healthcare bill "didn't go far enough" and super-majorities for the public option, and a majority for single payer to mean anything but the American people want single payer.
@AndroidPolitician A protest vote doesn't get you single payer health-care. Single payer is socialism, the majority of America will crumble economically because of it. Just like the E.U. is doing. Socialism has failed everywhere its' went and you're not even willing to move to the E.U. so it's not that great. You won't even walk you talk and emigrate. There's hard talk coming from you but not follow through, just hypocrisy. You should be in this movie too.
The US has double the healthcare spending of any other country and it's because of private healthcare providers, not socialism. Every other single payer country has no where near the cost of the US and it's because the single payer system works.
If you can't accept the fact that on poll after poll after poll, the vast majority of Americans prefer single-payer to our failing system now, then shut up and stop sidetracking this conversation away from the point.
@AndroidPolitician Double the health-care spending from private providers is the individuals choice to spend their own money. Of course people will spend more money on health-care seeing as most of the states in the U.S. are as big or bigger then those nations making up the E.U.! So we spend more for car insurance, on cars on a lot of things, it doesn't mean the taxpayer should pay for everything, that just means higher taxes.
Poll after poll has been shut up after these midterm elections...
The "double spending" isn't private, it's government healthcare spending. The government spends more then any other country because it has to subsidize a for-profit inefficient system.
No it hasn't, just like how the majority of Americans are for the Dream Act and are for the Kyoto Protocol after they voted for Bush.
The only exceptions to this rule is how the majority of Americans are for repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell and the Start Treaty but those actually got done.
Healthcare is a form of commerce. If you want to get really technical, the US is a signatory of the UN Charter which says healthcare is a basic human right.
At any rate, having the government not subsidize would be killing off millions of elderly and disabled people, when we know what works is single-payer.
@AndroidPolitician What a bunch of lies, with your stupid New World Order garbage. The US Constitution was written well before any stupid UN, the UN never existed at that time, there is no extension!!!
I don't see you moving to Canada or the E.U. H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E !!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Although your film appears to be a well produced (ie great product values etc), low budget affair (and I give you credit for that), it is clearly yet another attempt by yet another "documentarian" at propagandizing those who of a different political persuasion than yourself.
You have not sought to make a serious, thought-provoking piece on the dangers and perils of hypocrisy as a whole, you are merely pointing out the supposed hypocrisy of those whom you clearly disagree with.
I agree however I find the irony of this subject matter utterly delicious. the heroes of the left exposed for the hypcrits that they are. to be sure hypocrisy is not exclusive to the left, but since the left dominates our social order, from elementary school through to college and university and in certain sectors, I find it fitting that this movie focuses there. It is ultimately an anti-establishment effort.
They are in business. The Business of running America down for profit and power. That is the left. They get to be darlings of socialists throughout the world and be considered idealists while living the same lifestyle as those they attack.
Dr. Chomsky's case is the funniest in my opinion. Anti-capitalist? Yea right. Millions of books sold, Professorship at MIT, millions from speaking appearances, and millions in the stock market. The equation is: book sales + stock options + university job = capitalism. Haha. I love it; I thank it's great! And he called Milton Friedman a fool.
Finally, someone who will show corruption on the left side in a main stream way. It gets so tiring to hear how republicans are wrong from other movies and TV shows. Lets see how the other side handels it.
This is like the third time I've commented on this video, not because the others comments have been deleted, but because you keep taking your video down and re-uploading it. What's up with that?
Anyway, can't wait to see this. Peter Schweizer FTW!!!
Never liked Michael Moore. He ambushed Charlton Heston when Heston was at his home & was in the first stages of Alzheimers.
Michael Moore is IN the anti-terrorist documentary "Obsession, Radical Islam's War against the West"
Moore owns Haliburton stock as well as many congressmen.
Al gore owns a credit carbon company that could profit him about a BILLION dollars or more! 'Course the only way to get this money is to sell HIS GLOBAL WARMING HOAX!
It's interesting the only public figures highlighted in this trailer are those on the left, when there is an equal amount of hypocrisy across the board. Being skeptical of those politicians and activists only within a certain ideology is an obvious show of politics itself and this film seems to be an account of polarization with an agenda- the same kind that has and will continue to erode our once great democracy. Nothing new to see here folks, just politics at its finest.
Yea and the liberal talking points are interesting too.
George Bush is in office thus 9/11.
Conservatives had congress nearly 4 years ago thus the housing market disaster.
The poor are getting poorer thus increase taxes.
The movie is pointing out that if the left politicians find this problems to be so horrible why are they, themselves, not taking any measures of preventing such problems in their own personal lives.
You misunderstand the arguments of the left completely
We don't Blame Bush totally for 911, although he (Condi) was negligent in stopping it. The left generally places more of the Bin Laden blame on Reagen who armed and trained him and his followers
Again the housing market is not something we blame on Bush although he's part of the problem. We blame it on de-regulation and the emergence of corporate socialism for the lending industry
Again on taxes, the gap between rich and the poor has increased since we started cutting taxes. This tax cutting has led to massive debt which in turn leads to inflation which ends up increasing the cost of living more than any tax increase would as well as hurting industry in the US
As far as the video...Moore never says that rich people are bad, he never says owning stock is bad. What he says is poorly thought out war is bad and that the rest of the world has a more humane healthcare system
Humane health care system? Perhaps. Better health care system? No. Just look at Canada. We might go to them for cheaper pills, but they come to us for all of their serious hospital needs.
As for the vid. the "stock" thing is in reference that if Hellaburton is the enemy when it comes to Global Warming, why has he invested in them?
I think in the end, to get the full story, we will just have to see the vid.
I watched F.9/11 and those type films, lets see how this one compares...
I don't think the people of Canada favor switching to our system.
And no Halliburton was never blamed for global warming, again you seem to be horribly misinformed. Halliburton is criticized for being a war profiteer and not living up to their contracts properly.
I don't need to see this video because its thesis seems pretty silly. Its basically a character attack on Michael Moore instead of a counter-argument to Moore's film. If he actually debated healthcare it might be worth watching
Before you can argue you need to do more research and see things from other POVs.
I only argue strongly over things I'm informed about, and I post my opinion on things that I haven't dug up through non-bias documentary, research books, or creditable websites.
Again, the Leftest vids are no more informative on topics than this vid will be because that's not their goal. L.Vids' goal is to feed off of fear and blaming an easy target that cannot defend itself without being called a liar. That's why Nicholas Tucker and Lucas Abel made this, not to inform us on topics that we should already be informed about, but so we can see how these blamers live day to day, and find if they are really are as perfect or righteous as their cameras make them seem to be.
You act as if you have actually watched it. Save it after you see the film.
Also you should do some back tracking on Moore's vids to see how much truth is really behind what he says. Until then it's just some fat man telling you "The world is Chaos, but you need my vids to find out how doomed you all are, and how bad we all really got it in USA."
As for "truth behind what he says," There's no mystery. Moore lays out his policy arguments. You can agree or disagree with them, but they are clear. Whereas the people who made this film don't put out any ideas, they don't even attack other people's ideas. They just do personal attacks on the people coming out with ideas.
I guess to each their own, some people are more comfortable making decisions based on personality rather then policy.
If I sold to you a vid. where I said "we should stop wasting water", but then you found out that I turn on every sink in my house for days on in. I then come out with another vid about not wasting water, would you buy it? No of course not.
@cokenpepsi484 I'd be more enticed to watch if Schweizer wasn't called out for making shit up about: Pelosi, Franken, And Gore. Especially Pelosi, regarding her and Unions.
DaHonestAbe 6 months ago
@cokenpepsi484
stating facts about politians being hypocrites is not an attack. It seems like the left is oversensitive to anything that shows the truth of their own behavior. Instead of denying these peoples behavior why not acknowledge the issue
ilanchico 6 months ago
What? Supremacy clause? That is new world order, as far as 9/11 truther I don't even know who those people are. George Bush Sr. Mentioned New World Order, Henry Kissinger mentioned it and even the current administration mentioned the phrase World Order. Human Rights mandates? That's humanist NWO, they don't have the authority to determine what is and is not a human right.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
They mentioned a "New World Order" because the Soviet Union no longer existed dumbass.
What's even more pathetic is how you don't even realize the Supremacy Clause is from the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Do yourself a favor and look up "Supremacy Clause" into Wikipedia.
Since the US has to honor it's treaties, it has to honor the UN Charter.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician Henry Kissinger mentioned the New World Order about Obama smart one.
The U.S. Constitution does not recognize any foreign national documents. And you call me names, you don't have a clue what you're talking about. The Declaration of Independence broke away from the British charter, so of course we don't have to honor any foreign charter.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
"The U.S. Constitution does not recognize any foreign national documents."
Oh my god are you serious?
"This Constitution...and all treaties made, or which shall be made...shall be the supreme law of the land"
International Treaties are absolutely binding, the US Constitution accepts this.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician Your response is just plain moronic...apparently you don't know how to finish reading.
"and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." It doesn't say anything about all other nations in the world.
I notice you don't have a thing to say about Kissinger and Obama either. You must be an android. Here's a tip, get a better programmer.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
Um yes it does? What do you think "and all treaties made, or which shall be made" means? Yes it's saying judges in the country are bound to uphold those laws and treaties.
I think Kissinger is a war criminal and Obama is pretty mediocre. I don't fault politicians for saying "New World Order" especially when it's in the context of the Soviet Union falling apart or something else.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician It means within the U.S.A.!!! Not the world!! That's nuts! The Founders never asserted such a thing because that is complete asinine.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
Oh I'm sorry, is there some sort of new definition of "Treaty" I wasn't aware of?
And yes, the Founders signed treaties with foreign nations, like the Treaty of Tripoli.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician You should be sorry for being plain moronic, by the way what you call the "supremacy clause" is actually called Article. VI. You should have your programmer telly you sorry for not incoding the truth "Android" you're plain brain washed by some NWO Sociopaths. Your first argument 2 weeks ago, was that "the Supremacy Clause which combined with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights kind of mandates it." This never happened! Article VI was never combined with anything.
timcp1 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician And no, the Founders never signed a "treaty" with other foreign nations "combining" Article VI with some humanist mandates by which they gave up portions of their sovereignty to follow. Which is exactly what would have to happen to join such a "mandate". You're a proponent of the World Order. Not the sovereignty of individual nations...you are NWO.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
Holy shit are you an idiot?
Article VI is called the "supremacy clause" which the founders upheld by signing documents like the Treaty of Tripoli (which you have yet to address).
Since the US signed the UN charter, it is bound by the Constitution to uphold it. Period.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@timcp1
What's even funnier is your calling me "NWO" for wanting things that most Americans want, like single-payer and the Kyoto Protocol.
Are the majority of Americans "NWO"?
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician First, single payer health-care is Socialist, but the Kyoto Protocol is NWO. So to give you the benefit of the doubt, if indeed the "majority" want single-payer health-care, then the majority are Socialist. If the majority want the Kyoto Protocol, then the majority are NWO. If the majority want both, then they are New World Socialists.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
America: New World Socialists.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician Well at least now you're being honest, if you're right then have fun with the Great Depression II...
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
Uh no, I'm saying that your world view is so warped that democratic policies equate to "New World Order Nazi Socialism Obama Hitler".
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician Uh, actually I never said anything about the present administration, Nazi, or Hitler.
timcp1 1 year ago
LOL @ 0:27
adj789 2 years ago
The best part is when they try to interview Michael Moore, this movie gives it right back to him and every other hypocritical liberal out there. To: Daaremikkel, Obviously Nancy Pelosi isn't taking climate change seriously since she owns a vineyard in the Napa Valley. It takes a whole lot of water and insecticide to keep the wine presses running. Do you think she pays those working hands $20 an hour too?
timcp1 2 years ago
Another blatant example of "let us put our collective heads in the sand" and pretend that climate change is a non-issue. I fear that we will pay a dear price for our failure to deal with excessive greenhouse gas emissions and global warming.
Daaremikkel 2 years ago
the part where the guy hits his head for looking at the poster,i couldent help to laugh
urbanprophet777 2 years ago
Is Milton Friedman a hypocrite for being on Medicare? Rush Limbaugh for being on pain killers?
Really this movie idea can apply so much better to conservatives.
AndroidPolitician 2 years ago
Exposing hypocrites, sure, that certainly is evil and in bad taste....right.
ben4291 2 years ago
Typical right wing nonsense. Attacking the person instead of attacking the argument. Idiot.
tecknogyk 3 years ago
So,if a conservative makes a film like this,it is nonsense.A liberal makes it,it's a spoken truth.Where do those double standards come from?
tenfed1861 3 years ago
The difference is the liberal movie doesn't attack the person but the message. The conservative movie attacks the person and doesn't talk about the topics being discussed. They don't have an argument so they resort to ad hom's.
tecknogyk 3 years ago 8
That's funny.Because all the moonbat flims I've seen,they go right after the person.Comrade Moore going to Heston's home and the such isn't attacking a person?You have double standards,but that's ok.You are a liberal who only wants a liberal world.Hail Stalin,right commerade?
tenfed1861 3 years ago
Asking a person some pointed questions about a subject isn't attacking a person, but I wouldn't expect a right wing nutjob to understand that distinction.
tecknogyk 2 years ago 2
So a liberal calling someone a "fag",a "kike",hitting a person,and choking a person isn't attacking them?And how am I a nutjob?I am just pointing out that the gentleman is making the same type of film Michael Moore would make and yet you call double standards.I just want to know where this comes from?
tenfed1861 2 years ago
Wow, now you resort to making shit up. Exactly where did anyone call anyone a "fag" or "kike?" Does it take work to be this ignorant?
That's just it, it's not the same type of movie that Michael Moore makes, and since it seems to be beyond your understanding as to what the difference is then I think I'm wasting my time even talking to you.
tecknogyk 2 years ago
@tecknogyk The message is hypocrisy, and liberals are one of the biggest examples.
timcp1 1 year ago
I'm not going to get in the middle of this spat...but isn't calling him an "right-wing nut job" attacking the opponent and not the issue. "Hail Stalin" isn't much better. So what I'm saying is: You guys are never going to accomplish anything by bantering on youtube; the anonymity prevents any real stride toward a greater future.
Stepping off my soapbox...now.
luckylad14 2 years ago
God forbid someone on the left want to make a living while also helping others. Fucking idiot right wingers. . . .
tecknogyk 3 years ago
You're a typical left-wing douchebag moron. The Kennedys, Al Gore and other rich liberals don't need to make a living - they were born into enormous wealth thanks to the capitalist system they so despise. The point here is that they want to use government coercion to force average, middle class Americans to live a certain way which will actually decrease their standard of living while they themselves do whatever the hell they want, often in complete contradiction to what they preach.
JackCarter123 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What about people like Ted Haggard who LITERALLY went against what they preached?
This movie applies like 1000x better to conservatives.
AndroidPolitician 2 years ago
I didn't know who Haggard was until libs started making such a big deal about him. Did Haggard ever hold any public office? Was he ever hailed as a genius and given an Oscar like Moore? Did he ever give millions to campaigns and extremist groups like Soros? We all have weaknesses, but there's a difference betw. private issues and making public policy for everyone. If Al Gore is going to tax me for turning on my lights I expect him not to have a carbon footprint the size of Rhode Island.
JackCarter123 2 years ago
Haggard was mega influential to the evangelical movement.
Some even call him the face or Martin Luther King of the entire movement. So for him to do what he did is like Martin Luther King joining the KKK.
Well yeah but people like Al Gore are also super rich, it's not like he's going to turn off all the power in his house.
AndroidPolitician 2 years ago
Just to clarify, this isn't a "right-wing film." Ted Haggard doesn't escape criticism from us. In fact he opens the film, along with several other examples of conservative hypocrisy.
doasisaymovie 2 years ago
Oh please, the Moving Picture Institute is basiclly if The Heritage Foundation produced films.
Hell even the Harrison Bergeron film is meant to be serious and isn't made into a satire like in the book.
AndroidPolitician 2 years ago
@AndroidPolitician Michael Moore movies is basically if Socialist governments produced films.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
you're basically an idiot.
Plus the majority of Americans want things like single-payer healthcare and gun control etc.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician At least I know how to capitalize a word at the beginning of a sentence, oh smart one.
Yeah, and that's why Scott Brown was elected, and there hasn't been a gun ban...wait until November and pay attention this time around.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
Scott Brown got elected but the polls coming from Mass said the people thought healthcare reform didn't go far enough.
Anyways, November turnouts will be almost all dumb republicans who don't represent the majority of people or protest votes.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician Then the "people" of Mass shouldn't have voted him in if that was the case. How smart is it for Democrats not to vote then?
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
I think you mean how smart are about 70% of the entire country?
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician Democrats don't make up 70% of the nation.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
Yeah but about 70% of the country wants single-payer.
moourl(.)com/60zaa
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician Even Bill Clinton spoke pro-minority rights. So then what about the rest of the 30%? America is freedom of choice, and single payer removes it.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
Choice of what? Getting denied healthcare?
Plus private insurance can still cover things like dental and others.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician The freedom to be able to choose health-care other than government health-care you communist.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
So lets say I choose private insurance and my baby is born with Leukemia and they wont pay for it?
Alternative: get insured by medicare for all.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician A private insurance company cannot simply not pay for it if it is in your coverage. Also, you already have medicare. And this administration wants to fine someone for not accepting Government health-care, that's not freedom of choice.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
So your defense is "well that's how private companies work"?
Medicare and medicaid don't cover middle class families who might have the misfortune of getting a serious illness like cancer and then getting dropped because of it.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician That's a claim you make. But it's law that if you have the proper coverage they can't drop you. What about car insurance? If I get into a debilitating accident that far exceeds what I can afford, then what? Force auto insurance for all? What about house insurance? College insurance? It only stops with forced medical insurance based on your say so? Then the Government fines you for not accepting it? That's commy garbage.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
No you just make it single payer and then all those problems are gone.
I like how you defend insurance companies but neglect thousands of people who get denied for having leukemia babies.
I mean really? It's in an insurance companies best interest to get healthy people and deny the sick.
You're actively supporting a system that's best interest is to hurt sick people.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician
Single payer health-care is socialism and forced charity is no charity at all.
I defend freedom of choice, and not placing a tax burden on people. This nation was never setup to fund a sole health-care financial system by tax payer dollars. And people were in need of more medical care back during the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, and they still didn't put this burden on the people!
What about house & car insurance, do we have to pay that for you too?
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
Private insurance is a bigger tax burden because thousands of people die in the ER for being uninsured and then hospitals use tax dollars to pay for them.
What's funny is that about 70% of Americans favor what you call evil socialism. Care to explain that one?
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician It's not Constitutional. And I don't believe 70% of America wants Socialism. Watch Nov 2010 and then 2012 and we'll see how many people want Socialism.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
Call it whatever you want, you can't deny that about 70% of Americans want single-payer. It's a fact.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician How is it that you could possibly assert that 70% of Americans want single-payer after these mid-terms elections now?
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
moourl(.)com/60zaa
That's how.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician I guess they must have forgot one question then? Are you willing to vote for it? Apparently not.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
Oh I'm sorry, did I miss the single-payer referendum which if the majority votes on will implement single-payer health care nationwide?
The reason why people don't "vote on it" is because it's not an option, count the number of politicians who support single-payer and compare it to how many are needed to get it done.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician Obviously not since their representatives aren't voting for it, and many Democrat Governed states are now Republican just from the midterms alone.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
I meant the number of politicians ever, there's was like 10 democrats and one republican who supported it in both the house and senate despite the support of the majority of the American people.
The problem is that you're using people voting on politicians as a measure of democracy when I'm using the actual opinions of the American people.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician But look at what happen with the opinions of the American people, they simply didn't vote into office those Politicians who promote a Socialist taxpayer funded single payer health-care system. If those polls are in anyway accurate, then why did so many states turn Republican?
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
It's called a protest vote, the economy means the people in power get voted out.
It would be kind of odd to assume 2/3rds American people thinking that the healthcare bill "didn't go far enough" and super-majorities for the public option, and a majority for single payer to mean anything but the American people want single payer.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician A protest vote doesn't get you single payer health-care. Single payer is socialism, the majority of America will crumble economically because of it. Just like the E.U. is doing. Socialism has failed everywhere its' went and you're not even willing to move to the E.U. so it's not that great. You won't even walk you talk and emigrate. There's hard talk coming from you but not follow through, just hypocrisy. You should be in this movie too.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
The US has double the healthcare spending of any other country and it's because of private healthcare providers, not socialism. Every other single payer country has no where near the cost of the US and it's because the single payer system works.
If you can't accept the fact that on poll after poll after poll, the vast majority of Americans prefer single-payer to our failing system now, then shut up and stop sidetracking this conversation away from the point.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician Double the health-care spending from private providers is the individuals choice to spend their own money. Of course people will spend more money on health-care seeing as most of the states in the U.S. are as big or bigger then those nations making up the E.U.! So we spend more for car insurance, on cars on a lot of things, it doesn't mean the taxpayer should pay for everything, that just means higher taxes.
Poll after poll has been shut up after these midterm elections...
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
The "double spending" isn't private, it's government healthcare spending. The government spends more then any other country because it has to subsidize a for-profit inefficient system.
No it hasn't, just like how the majority of Americans are for the Dream Act and are for the Kyoto Protocol after they voted for Bush.
The only exceptions to this rule is how the majority of Americans are for repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell and the Start Treaty but those actually got done.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician Then the Government shouldn't subsidize. And it doesn't "have to" seeing as heath-care isn't in the Constitution.
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
Healthcare is a form of commerce. If you want to get really technical, the US is a signatory of the UN Charter which says healthcare is a basic human right.
At any rate, having the government not subsidize would be killing off millions of elderly and disabled people, when we know what works is single-payer.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
@AndroidPolitician What a bunch of lies, with your stupid New World Order garbage. The US Constitution was written well before any stupid UN, the UN never existed at that time, there is no extension!!!
I don't see you moving to Canada or the E.U. H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E !!!!
timcp1 1 year ago
@timcp1
It's called the Supremacy Clause which combined with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights kind of mandates it.
lol please don't be one of those NWO 9/11 truthers.
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AndroidPolitician
"Call it whatever you want, you can't deny that about 70% of Americans want single-payer. It's a fact"
--Thanks, I'll call it a lie.
NoGuff 1 year ago
That is a bald-faced lie!
The full title is "Do as I Say (Not as I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy" by Peter Schweitzer
chetcory 2 years ago
Good stuff!
psychomichael 3 years ago
When is this coming out?????
saveGOP 3 years ago
love it!
SoccerShadow 3 years ago
Absolutely and thank you my friend!
wyattmcintyre 3 years ago
I look forward to seeing this (I'm not so much anti-liberal as anti-hypocrite)...
jimwalsh2001 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Although your film appears to be a well produced (ie great product values etc), low budget affair (and I give you credit for that), it is clearly yet another attempt by yet another "documentarian" at propagandizing those who of a different political persuasion than yourself.
You have not sought to make a serious, thought-provoking piece on the dangers and perils of hypocrisy as a whole, you are merely pointing out the supposed hypocrisy of those whom you clearly disagree with.
END OF PART I
Magiclanternllc 3 years ago
I agree however I find the irony of this subject matter utterly delicious. the heroes of the left exposed for the hypcrits that they are. to be sure hypocrisy is not exclusive to the left, but since the left dominates our social order, from elementary school through to college and university and in certain sectors, I find it fitting that this movie focuses there. It is ultimately an anti-establishment effort.
LeGioNoFZioN 3 years ago
About time someone did a documentary on leftist hypocrisy.
StoogeWatcher 3 years ago 2
isn't it!
SoccerShadow 3 years ago
They are in business. The Business of running America down for profit and power. That is the left. They get to be darlings of socialists throughout the world and be considered idealists while living the same lifestyle as those they attack.
Ma3lst0rm 3 years ago
Dr. Chomsky's case is the funniest in my opinion. Anti-capitalist? Yea right. Millions of books sold, Professorship at MIT, millions from speaking appearances, and millions in the stock market. The equation is: book sales + stock options + university job = capitalism. Haha. I love it; I thank it's great! And he called Milton Friedman a fool.
ZDWmiamicane 3 years ago
Finally, someone who will show corruption on the left side in a main stream way. It gets so tiring to hear how republicans are wrong from other movies and TV shows. Lets see how the other side handels it.
OM2004 3 years ago
Can't wait for this. Michael Moore owns Halliburten Stock? Thats too funny.
ChefRski 3 years ago
5 Stars!
ConservativeVoiceUSA 3 years ago
Looks really good!
truthforamerica 3 years ago
Thank you doasisaymovie ! Wasn't aware of this - I think I want to see it !
Thanks Wyatt !!!
Dayniac4324 3 years ago
Is there an exact date set out for this? or just a rough guess?
saveGOP 3 years ago
This is like the third time I've commented on this video, not because the others comments have been deleted, but because you keep taking your video down and re-uploading it. What's up with that?
Anyway, can't wait to see this. Peter Schweizer FTW!!!
TheCobaltAgent 3 years ago
Never liked Michael Moore. He ambushed Charlton Heston when Heston was at his home & was in the first stages of Alzheimers.
Michael Moore is IN the anti-terrorist documentary "Obsession, Radical Islam's War against the West"
Moore owns Haliburton stock as well as many congressmen.
Al gore owns a credit carbon company that could profit him about a BILLION dollars or more! 'Course the only way to get this money is to sell HIS GLOBAL WARMING HOAX!
Tkank God he wasn't Prez during 9/11!
jefeisdguard 3 years ago
Can't wait to see the movie.
safeharbor7 3 years ago
It's interesting the only public figures highlighted in this trailer are those on the left, when there is an equal amount of hypocrisy across the board. Being skeptical of those politicians and activists only within a certain ideology is an obvious show of politics itself and this film seems to be an account of polarization with an agenda- the same kind that has and will continue to erode our once great democracy. Nothing new to see here folks, just politics at its finest.
bonerbeagle 3 years ago
If you want to see the other side then go watch some NBC or CNN news or go rent "Fahrenheits 9/11"
OM2004 3 years ago
COMMENTS ARE ALLOWED, SPAM IS NOT!
doasisaymovie 3 years ago
I always enjoy the conservative talking points.
Michael Moore has health insurance therefore there is no healthcare problem
Al Gore uses gasoline therefore global warming isn't real.
John Edwards has money therefore there is no poverty problem.
LMAO
indyleftist 3 years ago
Yea and the liberal talking points are interesting too.
George Bush is in office thus 9/11.
Conservatives had congress nearly 4 years ago thus the housing market disaster.
The poor are getting poorer thus increase taxes.
The movie is pointing out that if the left politicians find this problems to be so horrible why are they, themselves, not taking any measures of preventing such problems in their own personal lives.
OM2004 3 years ago 2
You misunderstand the arguments of the left completely
We don't Blame Bush totally for 911, although he (Condi) was negligent in stopping it. The left generally places more of the Bin Laden blame on Reagen who armed and trained him and his followers
Again the housing market is not something we blame on Bush although he's part of the problem. We blame it on de-regulation and the emergence of corporate socialism for the lending industry
indyleftist 3 years ago
Again on taxes, the gap between rich and the poor has increased since we started cutting taxes. This tax cutting has led to massive debt which in turn leads to inflation which ends up increasing the cost of living more than any tax increase would as well as hurting industry in the US
As far as the video...Moore never says that rich people are bad, he never says owning stock is bad. What he says is poorly thought out war is bad and that the rest of the world has a more humane healthcare system
indyleftist 3 years ago
Humane health care system? Perhaps. Better health care system? No. Just look at Canada. We might go to them for cheaper pills, but they come to us for all of their serious hospital needs.
As for the vid. the "stock" thing is in reference that if Hellaburton is the enemy when it comes to Global Warming, why has he invested in them?
I think in the end, to get the full story, we will just have to see the vid.
I watched F.9/11 and those type films, lets see how this one compares...
OM2004 3 years ago
I don't think the people of Canada favor switching to our system.
And no Halliburton was never blamed for global warming, again you seem to be horribly misinformed. Halliburton is criticized for being a war profiteer and not living up to their contracts properly.
I don't need to see this video because its thesis seems pretty silly. Its basically a character attack on Michael Moore instead of a counter-argument to Moore's film. If he actually debated healthcare it might be worth watching
indyleftist 3 years ago
Before you can argue you need to do more research and see things from other POVs.
I only argue strongly over things I'm informed about, and I post my opinion on things that I haven't dug up through non-bias documentary, research books, or creditable websites.
OM2004 3 years ago
Again, the Leftest vids are no more informative on topics than this vid will be because that's not their goal. L.Vids' goal is to feed off of fear and blaming an easy target that cannot defend itself without being called a liar. That's why Nicholas Tucker and Lucas Abel made this, not to inform us on topics that we should already be informed about, but so we can see how these blamers live day to day, and find if they are really are as perfect or righteous as their cameras make them seem to be.
OM2004 3 years ago
If the movie in any way argued the issues that Moore discusses in his documentaries then I might have watched it.
But it doesn't. It doesn't argue what the proper healthcare system should be. It doesn't argue that the war on terror is being conducted effectively
Its just about michael moore personally. How much money he has and other nonsense like that. Who cares?
indyleftist 3 years ago
You act as if you have actually watched it. Save it after you see the film.
Also you should do some back tracking on Moore's vids to see how much truth is really behind what he says. Until then it's just some fat man telling you "The world is Chaos, but you need my vids to find out how doomed you all are, and how bad we all really got it in USA."
OM2004 3 years ago
Again I see no purpose to the this movie
As for "truth behind what he says," There's no mystery. Moore lays out his policy arguments. You can agree or disagree with them, but they are clear. Whereas the people who made this film don't put out any ideas, they don't even attack other people's ideas. They just do personal attacks on the people coming out with ideas.
I guess to each their own, some people are more comfortable making decisions based on personality rather then policy.
indyleftist 3 years ago
Well what you said hit it preety well,
But not in a bias way you might be thinking of.
If I sold to you a vid. where I said "we should stop wasting water", but then you found out that I turn on every sink in my house for days on in. I then come out with another vid about not wasting water, would you buy it? No of course not.
OM2004 3 years ago
On the policy you might agree, but you would stop listing to me because i'm a hypicrite.
That's the point, to show hypicrites & how they are getting rich doing this.
OM2004 3 years ago
The thing is I really can't even imagine what Moore could be doing that is hypocritical to his arguments.
Does him being fat and able to pay for healthcare for himself make his argument that people who are not covered should be hypocritical?
What personal behavior could he have that makes his opinion that the Iraq war was a mistake and will just cause more terrorism?
indyleftist 3 years ago
I want to see this movie!
wyattmcintyre 3 years ago