u french bastard if we pull troops out we wouldnt have as much oil or protection they will die down there an thats dip shit terrorist eader will come out of his hiding place wich we will be more screwed
first of all im not french second there pretty much isnt oil over there anymore, and the terrist leader is in afghan why would he go to iraq thats where most of our troops are and alos havent you been watchen the news we just found a whole bunch of oil in alsaka
I'm sorry, but the appearance you give of is a bit ignorant. Do you truly understand the situation? I agree, we wouldn't have enough oil. However, we should be moving away from oil usage anyways. Furthermore, Bin Laden "that dip shit" has never touched Iraq soil since 9/11. He doesn't want to rule Iraq, he want's to piss off the west. Plus, Iraq is already in a civil war. It's no walk in the park over there no matter how much the media portrays it as.
ok, so lets assume that we shouldnt have gone into Iraq in the first place (I still support the decision), but how could Obama possibly say that we have to pull out the troops? the country would be an absolute mess. great vid nonetheless.
1st off, thanks for commenting. 2nd: It's true that Hillary would pull out too, but leave residual forces. Barack on the other hand would pull out all of our forces. His Iraq war plan is a four point plan. One step involves setting up a new parliament, cause the current one's crap. They spend more time in America then helping their nation. Secondly, it does involve pulling our troops out. They are too spread out and too few. They are stretched dry. It is impossible for them to deal with
with all the contingencies. There is corruption all across the world, but that does not mean we attack the whole world to get rid of a select few. You and I both know that if the oil had been in Sudan or N. Korea instead, we would be there in a heart beat; blaming it on genocide and making the world safe for democracy. Plus, this war was about WMDs. You never heard once before the war about "spreading freedom" or any of this crap we say it is now. Thanks for not being lame and hateful!
That is so true. Not one of the men who ran the planes into the towers was an Iraqi. They were mostly Saudi's but there's no chance Bush's going to attack that. He has too much financial interest. Instead, lets go after the people that posed no threat at all. How many WMD's did we find again? I can't ever remember...I think it's
Whats the song btw? Nice vid. Out military did what was asked of them and now its time to send them to Afghanistan where the fight is legit.
44warjunkie 1 year ago
war is wrong.they not doing anything but killing the innocents.kids,women,men..americans should feel sorry..they terrorising iraq right now.
asiandrifter1 1 year ago
@asiandrifter1 Thats bullshit!
44warjunkie 1 year ago
good clip should open some eyes this has 4 me
ozernea 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
good video, thanks
rmdesign 2 years ago
u french bastard if we pull troops out we wouldnt have as much oil or protection they will die down there an thats dip shit terrorist eader will come out of his hiding place wich we will be more screwed
gonefishen8 3 years ago
first of all im not french second there pretty much isnt oil over there anymore, and the terrist leader is in afghan why would he go to iraq thats where most of our troops are and alos havent you been watchen the news we just found a whole bunch of oil in alsaka
bassfishinfever 3 years ago
sry i was talkin to frenchpecock an im gettin comfused with the two of ya an that oil is in an enviromental protection area
gonefishen8 3 years ago
I'm sorry, but the appearance you give of is a bit ignorant. Do you truly understand the situation? I agree, we wouldn't have enough oil. However, we should be moving away from oil usage anyways. Furthermore, Bin Laden "that dip shit" has never touched Iraq soil since 9/11. He doesn't want to rule Iraq, he want's to piss off the west. Plus, Iraq is already in a civil war. It's no walk in the park over there no matter how much the media portrays it as.
PAiX
frenchpeacock 3 years ago
like the clips
iHackyourTouch 3 years ago
hey how did u get these files
iHackyourTouch 3 years ago
Hey,
I got them from CNN!
PAiX
frenchpeacock 3 years ago
ok, so lets assume that we shouldnt have gone into Iraq in the first place (I still support the decision), but how could Obama possibly say that we have to pull out the troops? the country would be an absolute mess. great vid nonetheless.
zimishzac 4 years ago 2
1st off, thanks for commenting. 2nd: It's true that Hillary would pull out too, but leave residual forces. Barack on the other hand would pull out all of our forces. His Iraq war plan is a four point plan. One step involves setting up a new parliament, cause the current one's crap. They spend more time in America then helping their nation. Secondly, it does involve pulling our troops out. They are too spread out and too few. They are stretched dry. It is impossible for them to deal with
frenchpeacock 4 years ago
with all the contingencies. There is corruption all across the world, but that does not mean we attack the whole world to get rid of a select few. You and I both know that if the oil had been in Sudan or N. Korea instead, we would be there in a heart beat; blaming it on genocide and making the world safe for democracy. Plus, this war was about WMDs. You never heard once before the war about "spreading freedom" or any of this crap we say it is now. Thanks for not being lame and hateful!
frenchpeacock 4 years ago
i would pull out of iraq but stay in afghan i mean afghan is where the real threats are
bassfishinfever 3 years ago
That is so true. Not one of the men who ran the planes into the towers was an Iraqi. They were mostly Saudi's but there's no chance Bush's going to attack that. He has too much financial interest. Instead, lets go after the people that posed no threat at all. How many WMD's did we find again? I can't ever remember...I think it's
ZERO!
Thanks for the comment; it's very true.
PAiX
frenchpeacock 3 years ago