Added: 4 years ago
From: ForeignPolicyMag
Views: 8,407
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I believe the reason why, the US in particular hasn't made any drastic leaps forward to alternative fuels, is because there is a lot more profit to be made in crude.

  • fucking beardy, full of shit.

  • we need energyyyyyyyyyyyy

  • Coal, just like oil, should not be used as fuel - because these things are more valuable as "chemicals" and as "raw materials". For example, coal is required for the 'reduction' of iron ore for steel production, just as oil is a raw material for a million products! Thus, if we use coal as a substitute for oil as fuel to burn, then we will lose a very valueable resource for other purposes. And that is equally frightening, too.

  • Even if peak oil is way down the road, doesn't it make sense to drastically change our energy policies now, given our warming climate, and our geopolitical climate? US foreign policy is influenced more by oil security than anything else, leading to 2 wars in the Gulf, a critical situation with Iran, and many policy choices that fueled the hatred that led to 9/11. If a terrorist bomb doesn't fry me first, the sun probably will, all because of our addiction to oil!

  • Any 'expert' (in this case the Economist correspondent) saying oil is made of "bones of crunched up dinosaurs" needs to go back to school.

  • I was kinda thinking the same thing when I heard that.

  • well, it is really algea, isnt it? I think he just said it like that to make it easy for people to think what it is. It's not a endless supply... :) Just my thought about that..

  • It looks like Jimmy Carter was RIGHT about energy policy being the moral equivalent of war. IF America had followed his ideas, peak oil might have been delayed a hundred years or more. Ask now, WHO it was that opposed Carter and his energy conservation efforts? THAT is who you DO NOT want to give power to and PRECISELY who HAS power in America today.

  • To describe Vaitheeswaran as "clueless" is overly kind! We are on the eve of destruction and he thinks that is a good thing?

  • Vaitheeswaran is another clueless journalist: does not understand geology, does not understand upstream technology, does not understand supply/demand margin constraints.

    Also, he plays the normal free-market fundamentalist bull about oil concentration. 2/3rds of oil is in Middle-East. Boohooo. Why did UK/US burn up their oil for themselves first? And then cry about other countries having more? Silly :)

  • What's Vaitheeswaran on about? Most of oil is decomposed vegetation, not dinosaurs.

  • The problem isn't scarcity or concentration, but production. Unconventional sources are slow as molasses to produce, peak oil has already happened if you look at the production data, and we don't have any time to prepare for it, much less 2 decades.

    In short, get ready for the largest discontinuity in the history of indistrial society.

  • saudi hav 1/4  wow

  • That's just their claim, in reality they have less now. Many of their assumed sources end up being empty or useless.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more