Spiderman 3 with A Scanner Darkly Effect

[puggface]

what a waste of time.

[EEMAGiNation]

what an idiot

[Rusty511]

die!

[tenjohn231]

adobe affter effect .,> cartoon effect> noise>threashold

[BrownSESION]

Fail!

[Valet2]

It sucks. A Scanner Darkly took 18 months to create all the art, and the artists made each frame from scratch, they draw each line many times to make it excellent.

Once again, this video sucks. Do something useful.

[ShadowedValleys]

Did he die?

[scumzerox]

fuck these losers, it was a nice try

[Path0fSight]

Rotoscoping > Posterizing.

'nuff said.

Not impressed =/

[1moe7]

no that's not the same effect

[MechoulamSergio]

FAIL

[hazeldine016]

hahah thats not the scanner darkly effect u dumpass... thats just a shitty editor effect that a 5 year old could do

[lucanelaaa2]

haha it SUX!

[Playjex]

are you on crack?

[misterhed]

More like "CRAPPY VCR" effect.

[scroungecan]

this boys and girls, is probably how the guy came up with the idea for the fucking film you sad bastard, why dont you stop taking out your insecurites on people who are just trying to be creative, fair enough it wasnt very good but theres no need to be a dickhead about, everyone has to start some place

[massiveconquistador]

idiot!

[brattyben]

Yeah, this is not a good Scanner Darkly effect. You actually have to draw over every frame.

Just saying This is just a posterizing effect.

Nice try/

[candycandall]

Thats a lot of shit sry

[srilentblow]

it makes everything look grainy...

FAIL!

[fillyboy22]

this boys and girls is what we call a "filter" effect...

F_A_I_L

[drchamp05]

That looks like shit and nothing like the movie go kill yourself for making this and wack off with another comic book you complete loser

[DigitalTransfer]

Wow. Some one does something and you do nothing...and they're the 'complete loser'? At least they're not online insulting people to make their own myopic life seem more interesting. But then again, you're the man with the name 'drchamp05'. Meaning you're the fifth person to use that name. Maybe I'm wrong on that, but from where I sit, that's mighty unoriginal. Go do something productive then complain about some one else being a 'loser' you petty petty little creature.

[sweetchippies2]

first of all, the fucking creator of the clip is named DrFeelGood516. so your logic is flawed asshole.

[Ligonboy]

that movie sucked not yours but spiderman 3

[rdphippo]

i wanna see someone correctly do this damn effect already, ive seen too many underachieving attempts

[mcrkid22]

Alright, this is Solarizing. Scanner Darkly used "Rotoscoping". All you did was add an effect. They took EVERY goddamn frame of the movie (over 2,000, to be sure) and animated it. They colored onto the film and made it like that. Do you have any fucking clue how long that must have taken??

[4fronator]

WAYYYYY over 2,000 frames.

movie was shot at 30 frames PER SECOND lol

[ribenawrath]

lmao- that was a gross underestimate

and this vid uses a 'find edges' filter. which is easily done in most editing software, but is never used because it looks wank. like this...

[openEYEstudios]

About 24 hours for just 30 seconds of footage.

[pman5789]

over 2000, lulz dude 2000 would give you like 2 minutes perhaps

[mcrkid22]

@pman5789 xD

I was naive 2 years ago.

[pman5789]

lulz my bad didnt see that

[part2themovie]

@mcrkid22 2000/(24 or 30) = 83 seconds, so no

[slider8585]

@mcrkid22 Better get your standard frame rates straight.

[TheDudeThatPwns]

@mcrkid22 It 130 man hours for 1 minute of the movie.

[mcrkid22]

@TheDudeThatPwns What are you referencing? Just wondering. Not doubting you, just curious.

[TheDudeThatPwns]

@mcrkid22 I saw a behind the scenes of the film.

[BeardedHoplite]

@mcrkid22 I read somewhere it took 150 animators something like 15 months to do it.

[mcrkid22]

@BeardedHoplite Yeah, watch the special effects on the DVD.

[FelixSchrei]

@mcrkid22 well this would have been quicker...

[theMAXX81]

its not using filters in your editing programs its about using after effects and spending over 300 workhours on one final minute of film, drawing that stuff. who cares. everybody is an artist. but dont cry if people won't buy it.

[Tramsit]

Just looks grainy to me.

[sanderson]

the drew more stuff, maybe add another filter.

[WolfKazumaru]

Disgrace!

[guitarraelectrica]

Not bad...

[hellokittyonastick]

that is NOT rotoscoping

[gabiii21]

Vaya pedazo de mierrrrda

[wisebob134]

Anyone can just use Photoshop

[indominavel]

Dude , you suck , this looks like shit...

[sirfrancisco]

yeah looks like a cheap effect, scanner darkly is absolutley mooore timeeeeee.

[Adamflik]

hmmm, looks like a photoshop filter

[nardelliwwespidey]

lol kool

[karmoulf]

The A Scanner Darkly effect is more complexe than that !!! It takes hours to finish one second ! But it's a good idea to add this effect to Spider-Man !

(sorry for my english !! ;-) )

[bluedragon21120]

didn't you just use poster effect on every

frame

[holyhappygod]

i thought it was a bit poor

my friends who are into this stuff have done better

[tonyblairhata]

nice one for trying to do something different with the spiderman 3 trailer - i dont like the spiderman movies but i at least like this trailer lol

[Thomas813]

its called rotoscoping

[bkfengshui]

You are not smart

[Xydrok]

the Scanner Darkly effect always reminds me of the Ultimate Spiderman game for some reason...

[laughingman8]

cause the game is cellshaded and the movie is rotoscope.

Pretty much the same thing.