Yes, men DO meet in smoke-filled rooms and decide what things will be supressed. Hitler was one of them...and he decided to wipe out the jews. Millions were murdered. Science has no evidence of consciousness yet as a doctor of psychology I can assure that consciousness is real. Many of our past presidents consulted astrologers before making big decisions because they know we are all connected in a meaningful way. Not everything is black or white...there are a LOT of gray areas in life.
Your sarcasm reveals a lot about your ignorance of the control system which suppresses truly ground-breaking knowledge at every turn. Unless of course that ground-breaking knowledge can assist in more easily destroying or controlling humanity en masse. As for "inadequate evidence" -- the evidence for many taboo subjects is often far more substantial than the evidence used today to accept the use of many prescription drugs.
Actually, men no doubt do meet in "dark rooms" as you say sarcastically, though they're probably not smoke-filled. Your incredible ignorance is really shining through this time. I did not suggest that all paranormal phenomena cannot be used for evil -- there is a lot of evidence to suggest that it HAS been used for evil -- and why wouldn't it in a world controlled by psychopaths? You REALLY need to open up that tragically CLOSED mind of yours -- it's in danger of disappearing into obscurity.
I much rather worry about real dangers in the world, sorry!
So paranormal phenomena was used for evil. Except that noone knows about it. Nuclear power WAS used for evil. Sticks and stones was used for evil. Paranormal phenomane was only used to parade the sheer credulity of individuals.
You have shown quite clearly that you are not a person who is really interested in truth. You already have your beliefs about what is crap, and no amount of hard evidence will convince you otherwise. This is because youre incapable of doing true research that is untainted by preconceived ideas. The evidence abounds for the suppression of many important things; choose to ignore it at your OWN PERIL. I have no time to point out the evidence to every close-minded fool that I encounter. Good day.
Have you ever heard of Google? (It seems very much like you haven't.) Do a search on "pseudoskeptic" and "Skepticult" to see what kind of person YOU are, for starters. Once you realise the type of person you actually are, you might -- though I make no promises -- have a chance to awaken. You might just see precisely why no amount of hard scientific evidence will ever convince someone close-minded like yourself.
Well you're clearly a hypocrite, since you've just evaluated me as being a "dead-on astrology-believer". As a matter of fact, I don't *believe* in anything -- rather, I accept as most probable those theories which have substantial evidence to back them up. As such, astrology, as it stands today, is absolute rubbish. However, there was an intriguing scientific experiment carried out decades ago known as "the Mars effect". Further investigation along those lines is certainly warranted.
If you cannot distinguish sarcasm from hypocrisy, I am really sorry. :)
"Further investigation along those lines is certainly warranted."
Yeah, extensive data-mining is the way to the future. I agree with your evaluation of astrology, I am just pessimistic that thousand years of nothing can give birth to something fruitful.
Yes, men DO meet in smoke-filled rooms and decide what things will be supressed. Hitler was one of them...and he decided to wipe out the jews. Millions were murdered. Science has no evidence of consciousness yet as a doctor of psychology I can assure that consciousness is real. Many of our past presidents consulted astrologers before making big decisions because they know we are all connected in a meaningful way. Not everything is black or white...there are a LOT of gray areas in life.
drjules900 4 months ago
/argues about something to fit in.
punchdrunkatheist 5 months ago
Newton studied alchemy.
Edison studied talking to dead.
Curie also. (Faraday, too)
What are they famous for?
The answer is self-evident, the agenda of Mr. Radin is self-defeating.
lovasip 4 years ago
So the problem is not the inadequate evidence and popularity-mongering over scrutiny, but those pesky scientists, who supress the truth.
lovasip 4 years ago
Your sarcasm reveals a lot about your ignorance of the control system which suppresses truly ground-breaking knowledge at every turn. Unless of course that ground-breaking knowledge can assist in more easily destroying or controlling humanity en masse. As for "inadequate evidence" -- the evidence for many taboo subjects is often far more substantial than the evidence used today to accept the use of many prescription drugs.
vardamir26 3 years ago 7
Yeah, men in grey jackets meet in smoke-filled, dark rooms and decide what ground-breaking, non-existing things will be supressed.
You also suggest that all paranormal phenomene cannot be used for evil purposes? Those pesky conspirators must be very dumb then.
:):):)
lovasip 3 years ago
Actually, men no doubt do meet in "dark rooms" as you say sarcastically, though they're probably not smoke-filled. Your incredible ignorance is really shining through this time. I did not suggest that all paranormal phenomena cannot be used for evil -- there is a lot of evidence to suggest that it HAS been used for evil -- and why wouldn't it in a world controlled by psychopaths? You REALLY need to open up that tragically CLOSED mind of yours -- it's in danger of disappearing into obscurity.
vardamir26 3 years ago
I much rather worry about real dangers in the world, sorry!
So paranormal phenomena was used for evil. Except that noone knows about it. Nuclear power WAS used for evil. Sticks and stones was used for evil. Paranormal phenomane was only used to parade the sheer credulity of individuals.
lovasip 3 years ago
You have shown quite clearly that you are not a person who is really interested in truth. You already have your beliefs about what is crap, and no amount of hard evidence will convince you otherwise. This is because youre incapable of doing true research that is untainted by preconceived ideas. The evidence abounds for the suppression of many important things; choose to ignore it at your OWN PERIL. I have no time to point out the evidence to every close-minded fool that I encounter. Good day.
vardamir26 3 years ago
"I habe no time to poin out the evidence"
... because you have none.
lovasip 3 years ago
Have you ever heard of Google? (It seems very much like you haven't.) Do a search on "pseudoskeptic" and "Skepticult" to see what kind of person YOU are, for starters. Once you realise the type of person you actually are, you might -- though I make no promises -- have a chance to awaken. You might just see precisely why no amount of hard scientific evidence will ever convince someone close-minded like yourself.
vardamir26 3 years ago
It clearly shows your hard skills at evaluating evidence that you know me after a few comments.
I am sure you are a dead-on astrology-believer. But I am too stupid to immense my thoughts in the hard evidence for this arcane art. :)
lovasip 3 years ago
Well you're clearly a hypocrite, since you've just evaluated me as being a "dead-on astrology-believer". As a matter of fact, I don't *believe* in anything -- rather, I accept as most probable those theories which have substantial evidence to back them up. As such, astrology, as it stands today, is absolute rubbish. However, there was an intriguing scientific experiment carried out decades ago known as "the Mars effect". Further investigation along those lines is certainly warranted.
vardamir26 3 years ago 5
If you cannot distinguish sarcasm from hypocrisy, I am really sorry. :)
"Further investigation along those lines is certainly warranted."
Yeah, extensive data-mining is the way to the future. I agree with your evaluation of astrology, I am just pessimistic that thousand years of nothing can give birth to something fruitful.
lovasip 3 years ago
Brilliant
lukeev 4 years ago