Correction: I just like knowing about the International Hearings on 9/11 in Toronto, Ontario. Our mainstream media is guilty of treason for not covering it. Not surprised that Mike Gravel, a U.S. Senator, has to go outside the U.S. to take action against our own shadow government. Message by (theteapartytruther)(dotcom) Oh, just making them all look like asses!
I just like knowing about the International Hearings on 9/11 in Toronto, Ontario. Our manstream media is guilty of treason for not covering it. Not surprised that Mike Gravel, a U.S. Senator has to go outside the U.S. to take action against our own shadow government. Message by (theteapartytruther)(dotcom) Oh, just making them all look like asses!
one who uses insult and argues without fact is ignorant. rosie's questioning her government, and they're shooting her down for that. now, which one is more american? speaking freely, and questioning her government or shutting up and never question?
@theaterofdreamswrite ha ha love it when she says lets get Popular mechanics (!) on ABC to debate. What a good idea. BRING IT ON lets see who wins that one, popular mechanics have been well and truly de-bunked,I'd LOVE IT if that happened
Hey I'm asian and I feel that the asian newswoman had effectively made a lot of other asians look very bad. She should tone it down a little and do a more professional job as a correspondent and not take the low, angry road. But, alas, it was not possible. To every one out there who think asians are like her, please think again. I don't think think that she has done her research on the conspiracy theories compared to what she was told by the media either.
She should read a mainstream newspaper. These are specifically doctored to make them more true. Sometimes raw facts are false by virtue of their utter loathsomeness. True, I wasn't taught classical rationality in school- but then again, neither was O'Reilly it seems.
o rielly is soo blatant,soo dumb, im only too glad hes the lil ole prick that he is, becuase hes doing such a fine job in makeing the average joe realise that the mass media is riddiculeing our intelligence by bieng soo blatant, as for that angry asian bitch of his,shes fuckin horrible
O'Reilly is a pinhead. I am pissed, not just at him, but at myself. I started watching his show a long time ago and I actually believed in him. Now I know I was duped, just like I was duped by the Bush Administration's explaination of 911. On 9-11-01 I, like many others, I wanted swift justice, pounded my chest with misguided patriotism, and wanted to join the fight against "terrorism." It wasn't until years later I learned the truth about 911. O'Reilly isn't stupid, just well paid (-off).
You took the words out of my mouth! I use to be a brainwashed sole by him and Fox for years but have studied now how dangerous our policy has been overseas for years. I am just beyond amazed at how Bill and other Neoconservatives wonder why so many countries hate us. We must awaken more Neocons and make them realize how dangerous people like Bill and Hannity are.
this video sucks. oreilly and that dumb bitch michelle malkin are only blowing ridicule and denial of all the overwhelming evidence that the official 9/11 story is false.
Malkin is yet another wind up puppet of war seeking Neoclowns. MOst of here statements have little to no facts and shes basically a media wind up puppet. Faux News is the same station that tried to sell the Iraq war for 6 years as a necessary war before even moderate republicans beag nto realize what a joke it was. Bill Orally is yet another non serving war promoting coward hiding behind a desk.
OReily an american patriot???? A patriot like Cheney, Wolfowitz, Bush, Feith, Bennett, Gingrich, Hannity, Limpbaugh and a host of other Neoclowns. What do all these "patriots" have in common? Not one of them served when they had a c hance to, in fact nearly all of them used deferments and priviledge to avoid active duty when they had a chance to serve. I guess you could call that a "patriot" if you are a brainless twit. LOL
10 sept 2001 it was announced that the pentagon couldnt account for 2 TRILLION dollars, and then 9/11 happened and this was never investigated. and yes enron and worldcom were about to be exposed and then poof, nothing. people overlook the blatant suppression of these cases, also the put options placed on UA, AA and Boeing are completely ignored by the general public. these have serious implications on the 9/11 story we were fed by the mass media and their conspiracy theory 19 muslims did it
who "crossed the line"? the mass media did. SHUT IT OFF people!! you don't need this garbage. you can hook up your TV to the internet and at least have some chance of being truthfully informed, then never even for a second flip to regular TV, simple as that! if there's shows/movies you like, just find a good torrent site and say goodbye to commercials while you're at it. just saying in case anyone out there still watches network TV, which is nothing more than a hypnosis tool.
"I do not read a single newspaper, & I feel infinitely the happier for it. The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads newspapers." -Thomas Jefferson
Fox isn't balanced, but neither is NBC, ABC, MSNBC, CNN etc. all have their propaganda. Rosie was the worst possible person to speak about 9/11, she wanted the spotlight; rather than applying the actual facts. 9/11 should be investigated and there is a lot evidence about the 9/11 truth, people like Alex Jones and Jason Bermas use facts to support their argument.
The one thing Rosie was right about was the media, but everything she said was ludicrous. She's a left nut, O'Reilly is a right nut and Jones is just a hack. His so-called evidence are cherry picked and he chose to see the 'similarities' in videos when there are way more differences in them. The only thing similar about his videos were that both buildings fall to the ground.
We can go hours about the two towers, but logically explain how building number 7 fell under 8 seconds; In the 9/11 report out of 185 pages only couple of sentences were about building number 7, and claimed it collapsed in 18 seconds, not true. I just want an answer, becasue their are too many unanswered questions what happened that day. I don't want to believe it, but what if.
This is the problem, people assume it's conspiracy, because we the people want to investigate more about it, because the government won't answer the questions. Think about it, watch Arron Russo 9/11 and tell me something is not right.
Too many still live in denial though. I wonder after the revolution how many of the treasonous "debunkers" will be rounded up, tried and executed for their crimes of aiding and abetting mass murderers
Yes...as NPF said.... Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Firefighters for 9/11 Truth Lawyers for 9/11 Truth Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth Patriots Question 9/11 Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice Scientists - Journal of 9/11 Studies Researchers - Complete 911 Timeline Here a bunch of 5th graders Snap put of it 911moron! TIme to go back to school
michelle malkin is a crazy bitch. This whole video was a giant personal attack on Rosie, as if she is any representation of the Controlled demolition theory. How dare her call our government murders! I mean, they've only been caught executing false flag terror time after time.. Maby O'reilly should read the Northwoods Document. Maybe have David Ray Griffin on the show? Fair and balanced my ass. Talk about propaganda
It is funny that O'reilly would stand by their work, beings they won't even stand by their own! "I dare abc to put on the editors of popular mechanics to put the people strait". That's a good idea! We could have a big debate. Such a debate has infact already been suggested... however, neither NIST or PM have the balls to debate men like David Ray Griffin. They know the official conspiracy can not stand up to scrutiny. entering the "hate club". What about the "hate" the 1st ammendment club?
This is YellowJournalisimpalooza! I find it sad that idiots like O'reilly and PM are so diluted, that they continually use the word 'conspiracy theory' one sidedly, as a derogatory term, all while being ignorant that there own theory is a conspiracy! And it is an irrational conspiracy theory, as apposed to the controlled demolition theory. "scientific evidence that is beyond dispute"?? that is laughable. PM's book is unscholarly garbage. Refuted by "debunking 911 debunking".
Pick a topic. Any topic. I'll gladly debate you. I have reaserch stand down, foreknowledge, the hijackers etc....Trust me, there is an explanation for everything.
ok how do you explain the phone calls that were made from flight 93 (the cell phone calls) even though a american airlines eployee said they didnt even have air phones on that plane
Is that your'e evidence?Someone says something and you automatically believe it. Why don't you tell that to the airphone operators who took those calls? That employee probaly has never been on a plane. Unless he gives you 100% proof it's just his opinion.
haha no thats not all that was just an interesting quote i saw, but what i can tell you is that at least 4 of the calls made from flight 93 were from cell phones, and in 2001 it was impossible to call from a cell phone at 30,000 feet going 500miles an hour, and you said you could give me an eplanation for anything so give me one
Is your opinion based on Project Achilles? Which is seriously flawed. Cells work when in low population areas. Which is why the cell calls were made. Most were dropped if you look at the transcripts. that conspiracy nut(is he impartial in his "study") flew over London. Something he doesn't tell you. Got another one.
No first off its not an opinion and second no it is not based off of project achilles, what it is based of is the science writer A.K. Dewdney (a former professor of mathmatics and computer science) who did an experiment to test whether or not you could use a cell phone from an airliner at the altitude flight 93 was at and found it impossible (short version) he did many other test proving that the calls had to be fabricated, you can look it up if you like
Bill o is a MORON...and Michelle Malkin is a scumbag, how do these people keep their jobs, oh I know dumbass American citizens who think these people are smart.
Why is everybody that disagrees with the childish 911 thruthmovement paid by the CIA? It's like you guys think that everyone who believes the official story somehow knows that it actually was an "inside job" and that we are all under CIA's payroll to keep our mouth shut, wouldn't that be risky and very expensive? The truth movement, is dead, and it has always been dead, the message is so dumb, it doesn't even deserve to be called a movement
I was doing some research today and found something interesting.
Google Christopher Bollyn 911 planes flew directly into secure computer rooms
The whole NE section of the 81st floor of the south tower was stocked with "batteries" that were never used. And they were set in place in the SUMMER PRIOR TO 911.
Well well well...What floor did the plane "strike" on? What side of the building?
The fact that they go so far as to get personal and call CT'ers kooky crackpots tells me this has all been typed up by somebody else. I'm sorry but Michelle Malkin would have needed permission to talk as much smack as she is.
"Some people are just fucking stupid"..."wake up you wankers".."lets make a fucking war against them assholes." -----lol...I mean come on, Do i need to say anyrhing else? You sir, should not be allowed to procreate..
Why is the research beyond dispute? Because it's Popular Mechanics. They had some kid about 12 years old with no experience other than a couple lightweight articles about small aircraft research the book. Now they won't even let him appear on talk T.V. or radio ( His name is Davin Colburn) cause he keeps getting owned and making Pop. Mech. look stupid. Not that O'reily is any more credible. Mr just shut uo and do what your told or your a traitor.
the research is indisputable. not just because of popular mechanics. anyone who believes 911 was a planned demo has lost their mind. these people let their extreme hate blind them from clear truth.
popular mechanics is a joke, their collapse theory has us believe trusses provide the majority of lateral support for the WTC inner columns not steel beams, their sagging truss theory is implausible because they completely ignore the fact that the floors do not just sit on the trusses but are rigidily attached to them.
try researching a little further than just trusting what you are told on FOX news for gods sake.
you are being exploited by the 911 truth movement. fox news is not the sole voice of opposition to this. not one major university worldwide supports your crazy views. even al jazerra has dismissed this movement as a joke. if you ever feel the need to seek out actual information (as opposed to your pitiful propaganda) i could direct you.
so u must have researched what gague steel the trusses were, and how much weight was above the damaged areas. im sure you understand things like point load. or maby your being exploited by people who use convincing sounding arguments. how was it that not one shred of evidence was ever uncovered by cleanup crews? why does even al jazerra dismiss the truth movement as fantasy? how does not one major demo company or publication agree with you?
Other than thermite and cut steel beams(which were found) what do you expect to be found at ground zero to suggest controlled demolition?
let me ask you why was 80% of the steel scrapped without being examined.without being subjected to detailed analysis.
and why were clean up workers told it was completely safe to work at ground zero, and now a high percentage of them a suffering from serious respiratory serious disorders?
Could it be that the Government actually lie to the public?
yeah ive heard the cut beams and the thermite argument, and ive also seen video of the same beams being cut. thermite dosent explode it only burns. you are being lied to about the steel never being examined. why hasnt the fdny, nypd, fbi, cia, faa, or any major university worldwide taken on your cause, especially considering how many of their friends died that day. who you rely on for info are lying extremists. thats why you believe it. you ignore everyone except a select few who support 1 view
there are hundreds of qualified engineers, architects, scientists not to mention firefighters who are part of scholars for 911 truth. yet to make yourself feel better you like to refer to them as lying extremist kooks.
the cia and fbi??? lol!, now there's a some trust worthy organizations, try reading "killing hope" by william blum.
some is the key word. always some crazies in any grouping. a more accurate way of saying it is very few. you are being exploited by low budget filmmakers. you actually believe that you have a rightful place in debate. loony bin is where people loike you belong
so dummy, how do you explain how fdny chief of operations daniel nigro took a team of engineers to building 7 took readings with heat sensing equipment measured the building with a transit and determined it would fall, hours before it fell. is the fdny part of the coverup? are they covering for the people that murdered their friends? or maby you have no idea how to seperate facts from lying propaganda (a symptom of stupidity) i got plenty of real facts at my disposal. you are being exploited.
here are the facts, Do you have any idea what it takes for a building to collapse in the manner it did, heres a hint - a simultaneous failure of multiple lower key support columns, that's why we have controlled demolition teams, according to your logic we could just start small fire in a building.
according to the fdny it was much more than a small fire that took down bld 7. i know you believe that they were in on it, but people with any degree of common sense understand that no one is covering for people who murdered their friends. did you know that bld 7 shared its foundation with the towers? did you know that it had 20,000 tons of diesel fuel in its basement? did you know that building 7 was built spanning a subway and a power station? or maby you have no clue about what you are saying
speaking of common sense, do you have any idea how fire resistant structural steel is. here is a hint - its at least 10X thicker that that thin frying pan you use to cook, yet how long would it take for your frying pan to weaken if you held it over an open flame???? 10 years, 100 years, 10000000000 years perhaps?
i see so we should ignore the actual science and replace it with an analogy involving a frying pan. i told you that you would not be able to answer how the fdny predicted the collapse hours before it fell. by the way when you cant even define fact it makes it real hard to formulate an argument. you are being exploited by low budget filmmakers on u tube. im sure your still proud though
"i see so we should ignore the actual science and replace it with an analogy involving a frying pa"
no amount of science can prove that 1+1=3 unless you are a complete imbecile. forget the frying pan and try the holding a piece of structural steel over an open flame, and see how long it takes to weaken.
guess what different fires burn at different temperatures. office fires will sometimes burn at 2500 deg F. to make structural steel bend requires a temperature of 1200 deg F, it will also expand in length about 30% at those temperatures. thats the actual science (as opposed to your "proven" frying pan science) you obviously cant answer any of my questions about the fdny evaluations of bld 7. im done humoring stupidity. good luck with your handicap
actually office fires have NEVER burned that hot with the most optimal oxygen ratio, and to weaken steel it takes 790deg f, so you need to look into your science
how big does this conspiracy get? are you saying that the cell phone companies doctored their records? what your implying is that tens of thousands of normal everyday americans where seamlessly involved without it being leaked beforehand. am i right?
no? what i am saying is that the 911 commission report has been prooven false many times and "americasfan" wanted me to give him a topic to debate so i thought of the most simplest thing which happen to be the cell phone calls, sopposedly there were calls made from flight 93 made by cell phones (as it says in the report) well it has been proven to be impossible to do that in 2001
its not proven. you just believe everything you have been told by your exploiters. why arent the cell phone companies speaking up? are the family members lying about talking to their dead loved ones? i bet you cant explain these things to me in a normal logical way.
well your response is anything but scientific it is backed up by nothing, you have not disproved my statement that you cannot call from an airliner at 30,000 feet in 2001, it is a scientific FACT that you cannot and that is why popular machanics ommited it completly out of its report, and i have been told by exploiters? is that your argument?
Mark Binghama and Tom Burnett cancelled their flights from the day before. How did the government copy their voice on just short notice? One lady called hers sister and gave her the combination number of her safe where she kept her will in her closet. How did the government know she had a will, where it was, and what the combination number was? How did the government copy their personality traits?
Oh so you are saying you can call from an airliner traveling at 500mph at 34,000+ feet and get through? if this was possible then why would american airlines put thousands opon thousands of dollars in a new technology (pico cell) in 2004 to make it possible to use a cell phone on a jet airliner? then the ceo of AA said " commercial availability of cell phone use in flight is approximately 24months away" hmm thats interesting since you thought you were already able to do so
you have selective reasoning. only things that support your stupid theories is considered, in the way you think. truth is you cant handle a real debate with me ( a symptom of your stupidity)
hahaha you just did debate me and lost, you cant handle loosing to me, and i dont have selective reasoning i have alot of sources that support my claim, you have not disprooved anything i have said soo admit your loss and moove on
u have three sources 1) loose change 2) scholars for 911 truth 3) alex jones. you are being exploited by these groups. the fact that you cant see past this shows that you are part of the most gullable of all people.
Did i mention a single one of those ever....NO i did not, but since you dont know what to say and you connot beat me your trying to put words in my mouth and make assumptions
so tell me, who is it thats exploiting you and making you believe these fantasies. As a member of society (who is not mentally challenged) i can clearly understand the methods that are being used to fool you.
See this is what you dont get nobody is "exploiting" me or any one else on the fact that it is an inside job, there no reason to, there is no agenda, nothing to accomplish but telling ppl the truth, but on the other hand if you look at what you believe and are being told you are the one being "exploited"
Because the demand was there you idiot. Cell phones at that elevation didn't work well. They did work however. The transcripts reveal alot of dropped calls. When the plane was in a low population area it worked longer than in high population.
Well obviously you think they did work because that what they said but as it has been pointed out it was IMPOSSIBLE so the calls had to be fabricated, its that simple, it couldnt work no matter what
you are being exploited. loose change cost almost nothing to produce but it grossed tens of millions. the more people that these groups can fool the more money they get. because somone who sounds official tells you something dosnt mean its not a marketing ploy. you are very bad at seperating cult marketing ploys from actual legitimate sources of truth.
its funny being called a moron by somone who is stupid enough to be exploited by the 911 truth marketing scheme. and yes loose change grossed tens of millions (look it up if you can muster the mental capacity)
Ok now the argument has changed to if loose change made money or not, even though you can watch it for free and in the movie it says burn it and distribute it you still believe they made millions, Dillon Dunbar (director) is not a millionare no matter how many times you say it, since you are such a computer wiz why dont you send me the link showing how much money it grossed, YOU FUCK TARD SIGHT YOUR SOURCES! you keep going in a circle and not aclomplishing anything
loose change was in the movie theatres and people paid to go see it ( some things i just dont need to cite) just look it up. (it grossed tens of millions just like i said) you are citing sources that have 0 credibility because you have no clue how to seek information. if your cell phone conspiracy is your strongest proof then you are putting out quite a pitiful argument. (symptom of your utter stupidity)
Ok first off it was not in any of the main movie theatres at all maybe little personaly owned ones, and if you choose to believe it made a bunch of money then so be it but i know it didnt, i know where the guy works that made it and he is not a millionare, second about the cell phone claim if you would of read a few comments back you would of seen why i started there,
i could bring up plunny of other evidence and arguments to but i figured that would be the simplest one to put, and just because you have no argument and cannot proove other wise doesnt mean that it is a pitiful argument, i used the cell phones because it was a blatant lie in the commission report and it disproves its credability
see the problem is you think that your sources are citing factual information. what your really doing is getting fooled because you dont know enough to seperate a marketing ploy from actual investigatigations. its real easy to go on u tube and find wackos who will propigate these stories. its a good way to weed out the mentally challenged (im talking about you)
First off you dont know anything about me so dont try to turn the argument into a personal thing, i listed those facts, and they are facts, acording to you, you believe that ppl that give facts are mentaly challenged, and stop trying to use your marketing ploy theory because it is just your opion and backed by nothing, unlike what i say which is factual evidence
this is a fucking circle argument thats all u fucking have!! you are being exploited exploited exploited,. and you saying they arnt facts doesnt make them not facts...lol
you dont deserve my explanation of how insanely stupid you are being. you are a low life who is spitting in the face of every rescuer who was there that day. i have plenty of facts and common sense evaluations of what happned that day. you dont have the capacity to handle this type of information. you need to watch discovery channel for a while. leave political (if u want to call what u do political) talk to the people with some sort of context.
in order for what you have benn fooled into believing to be true. 1) hundreds of security personnel at three different aiports would have had to completely change a whole days worth of security footage unnoticed. (impossible) 2) the rescue workers that were at ground zero, who watched their friends die, would all have to be lying for the government to cover up for their friends murderers. (you are a piece of dog crap who has no concept of reality, and no real answer to these two points)
no all they would have to do is confiscate the footage and that isnt to hard since they did near the pentagon, and for the ppl watching thier friends die that isnt even rellivent since i never mentioned they had fake deaths? i really dont understand where you are goin with this
the footage was never confiscated it was handed over to the federal government. the fottage remains the property of airport security. no men in black came in and took it. you dont think your arguments out to well, do you? the fdny would have known about bombs taking down the buildings (if that fantasy story were true) the official reason those buildings fell, according to the fdny, was due to massive fire and structural damage.
Well they did take the footage look it up and they have only released like 3 of the 80 videos taken that day so yes they could do the same thing in an airport, and fdny heard the explosions to and told ppl to get out because the building was coming down, and for the fire theory it is impossible and even if it was every collem would of had to fail at the same time, and it wouldnt of fallen straight down through the path of most resistance, it would of fallen to the side
all you are is a parrot of truther lies. the fdny predicted the fall of building 7 hours before the actual collapse. did they see the bombs and then make up an elaborate lie to cover up for the same people who murdered their friends? you cant give me any answer except truther propaganda, which is laughed at by all of academia. you are being exploited like i said. and believe me ,i know, you wont grow a brain anytime soon. this type of behavior will hurt you in life
If they didn't work where the hell are the cell companies confirming this and questioning the calls. Only 2 calls were on cell phones the rest on the airphones.
Well that shows your credibility, there were not airphones on flight 93, and for the cell phone companies they didnt have to confirm anything since it was impossible to call in the first place, your argument is weak, i state facts and you dispute nothing
Cell phones work well. If you did your research you would know what phone calls were made and from where and how long they lasted. Why aren't the cell companies the least bit suspicious about the cell calls being made at high altitudes? both phone calls made from flight 93 were at around 25,000 feet in a low population area. Thats when they work at it's best. Cell calls don't work as good on high altituded but the lower the better.
You are telling me to do my research? When the calls were made the plane was around 32,000ft and then climbed to over 40,000ft, that is documented fact by the air trafic controllers that day, see this is why i hate arguing with morons they can never get anything right, if you were to look up the test that show what you can and cant do by Dewdney you come to a conclusion that it is impossible to call from an airliner at that altitude and speed
First,that idiot dewdney believed in a conspiracy even before the test.he wouldn't have a hidden bias would he?Second, he flew over heavy populated areas.Third,the cell companies work pretty good in very low populated areas.If you look at the timeline, the length of each call(only 2 on cell phones)and several other factors you would know that.But no you have to believe people who believe in a conspiracy.His work has serious flaws.Screw loose change and 911 myths debunk that stupid study.
Well to point out the first flaw in your comment he was not bias he simply examined the evidence and came to a conclusion that is not debatable, and your low population areas agrument is irrelivent because your 30,000+ft in the air and it wouldnt matter anyway, and for the 2 calls? what are you talking about, there were 13 calls made- News reports (San Diego, 2001), (BBC, 2001), (Telegraph, 2001), i would like you to cite your source of 2 calls
two 1 1/2 cent coins would = 3 cents so in that case 1+1 does equal 3. maby you should expand your thinking. the box your thinking in is pretty limited
you cant explain how the fall was predicted hours before it fell can u? you have no background in science engineering architecture, or any other related field. you rely on propagandist posts on u tube for your info. good luck dealing with your handicap. it must be easy to selectively choose pieces of info to support your vievs. it just isnt a legitimate way to research. again you can never explain the fdny prediction can u? (and actually not sound retarted)
that asian chick needs a bat to the face. A payed disinformation agent.
carnage4907 1 month ago
hahahaha fucking truthers where are u 2005? c'mon u been debunked years ago hahaha u lot need to get girlfriends.. get alex cock out ur mouths
gazoopi 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Correction: I just like knowing about the International Hearings on 9/11 in Toronto, Ontario. Our mainstream media is guilty of treason for not covering it. Not surprised that Mike Gravel, a U.S. Senator, has to go outside the U.S. to take action against our own shadow government. Message by (theteapartytruther)(dotcom) Oh, just making them all look like asses!
disheartedheart 3 months ago
I just like knowing about the International Hearings on 9/11 in Toronto, Ontario. Our manstream media is guilty of treason for not covering it. Not surprised that Mike Gravel, a U.S. Senator has to go outside the U.S. to take action against our own shadow government. Message by (theteapartytruther)(dotcom) Oh, just making them all look like asses!
disheartedheart 3 months ago
Is this balanced news coverage?!!
HardcoreJungFunk 3 months ago
I'll take that dare
gavins1970 4 months ago
/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o
/watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k
/watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI
/watch?v=WxqoChniKVU
/watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4
/watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY
/watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE
/watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w
/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ
/watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA
megamogx 4 months ago in playlist fishy 911
one who uses insult and argues without fact is ignorant. rosie's questioning her government, and they're shooting her down for that. now, which one is more american? speaking freely, and questioning her government or shutting up and never question?
now lets ask our fore fathers
xxhouseindenverxx 4 months ago
This is a masterpiece, polished to absolute perfectness.
WomanInTheRedDress 6 months ago
Since when did Popular Mechanics become the cornerstone of truth?
theaterofdreamswrite 6 months ago
@theaterofdreamswrite ha ha love it when she says lets get Popular mechanics (!) on ABC to debate. What a good idea. BRING IT ON lets see who wins that one, popular mechanics have been well and truly de-bunked,I'd LOVE IT if that happened
HardcoreJungFunk 3 months ago
Hey I'm asian and I feel that the asian newswoman had effectively made a lot of other asians look very bad. She should tone it down a little and do a more professional job as a correspondent and not take the low, angry road. But, alas, it was not possible. To every one out there who think asians are like her, please think again. I don't think think that she has done her research on the conspiracy theories compared to what she was told by the media either.
drla02 7 months ago
that one angry asian woman should be shot, stab here pleeeease !
Taobert 8 months ago 2
@Taobert :D... ye shes a bit biased..
dickobrazz01 6 months ago
where from popular mechanics is the "scientific evidence" that can't be disproven?
matthockey1630 9 months ago
She should read a mainstream newspaper. These are specifically doctored to make them more true. Sometimes raw facts are false by virtue of their utter loathsomeness. True, I wasn't taught classical rationality in school- but then again, neither was O'Reilly it seems.
shatterknee 9 months ago
how is this still a debate when these people have been proven wrong soooo many times??
58ravenfan 11 months ago
o rielly is soo blatant,soo dumb, im only too glad hes the lil ole prick that he is, becuase hes doing such a fine job in makeing the average joe realise that the mass media is riddiculeing our intelligence by bieng soo blatant, as for that angry asian bitch of his,shes fuckin horrible
wild0hawk 1 year ago
O'Reilly is a pinhead. I am pissed, not just at him, but at myself. I started watching his show a long time ago and I actually believed in him. Now I know I was duped, just like I was duped by the Bush Administration's explaination of 911. On 9-11-01 I, like many others, I wanted swift justice, pounded my chest with misguided patriotism, and wanted to join the fight against "terrorism." It wasn't until years later I learned the truth about 911. O'Reilly isn't stupid, just well paid (-off).
llaazzyy88 1 year ago
@llaazzyy88
You took the words out of my mouth! I use to be a brainwashed sole by him and Fox for years but have studied now how dangerous our policy has been overseas for years. I am just beyond amazed at how Bill and other Neoconservatives wonder why so many countries hate us. We must awaken more Neocons and make them realize how dangerous people like Bill and Hannity are.
rmccay88 1 year ago
why is he interviewing someone from pearl harbour
daveygravey123456 1 year ago
That's the favorite saying, it seems, when they are really reaching:
"a slap in the face to the families of 9/11 victims"
Of course never you mind about all these family members who have been DEMANDING ANSWERS FROM THE GOVERNMENT AND GETTING NOTHING....
just never mind that......
punkeratheart 1 year ago
No coming back......remember what this ass did to that kid who lost his father on 9/11. I wish this guy wouldnt come back.
nath8282 1 year ago
real eyes, realize, real lies. fuck oreilly, fuck him up his stupid ass
scoretosettle 1 year ago
this video sucks. oreilly and that dumb bitch michelle malkin are only blowing ridicule and denial of all the overwhelming evidence that the official 9/11 story is false.
stefanmuth 1 year ago
What money these war's are a money pit
Obelisk2290 1 year ago
Malkin is yet another wind up puppet of war seeking Neoclowns. MOst of here statements have little to no facts and shes basically a media wind up puppet. Faux News is the same station that tried to sell the Iraq war for 6 years as a necessary war before even moderate republicans beag nto realize what a joke it was. Bill Orally is yet another non serving war promoting coward hiding behind a desk.
ghostzapper2006 2 years ago 4
OReily an american patriot???? A patriot like Cheney, Wolfowitz, Bush, Feith, Bennett, Gingrich, Hannity, Limpbaugh and a host of other Neoclowns. What do all these "patriots" have in common? Not one of them served when they had a c hance to, in fact nearly all of them used deferments and priviledge to avoid active duty when they had a chance to serve. I guess you could call that a "patriot" if you are a brainless twit. LOL
ghostzapper2006 2 years ago
WTC7?
Why Would DEMOLITION Companies Bother Using Expensive Explosives,
When They Could Just Use 'Magic Fire' To do The Job in A Couple of Hours?
No need For Blast Furnaces Anymore For Smelting Steel. No No No.
Just Use 'Magic Fire'
'Magic Fire'
Buy Some Now While Stocks Last.
'Magic Fire' is a Registered Trademark of Elite Scum inc.
(Includes Enough 'Magic Fire' For Three Steel Framed Skyscrapers, if You Purchase with A Credit Card Today, Planes Not Included)
PikeSdream 2 years ago 21
This has been flagged as spam show
ENRON All Investigation Files Were In WTC7, ALL Files Destroyed.
ENRON Investigation Cancelled!! SEC in WTC7?
You DO Remember ENRON??
ENRON? WORLDCOM? $70 Billion Fraud California?
The Missing Pentagon TRILLIONS Prior to 911?
Trillions Missing from the Pentagon?
The Pentagon Missing TRILLIONS Prior to 911?
Rumsfeld? Pentagon? Missing Trillions? Prior to 911?
Missing Trillions? ENRON? WTC7? WORLDCOM?
$70 Billion Fraud California? Security Exchange Commission?
PikeSdream 2 years ago
10 sept 2001 it was announced that the pentagon couldnt account for 2 TRILLION dollars, and then 9/11 happened and this was never investigated. and yes enron and worldcom were about to be exposed and then poof, nothing. people overlook the blatant suppression of these cases, also the put options placed on UA, AA and Boeing are completely ignored by the general public. these have serious implications on the 9/11 story we were fed by the mass media and their conspiracy theory 19 muslims did it
babybluesnowden 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Post 911 ANTHRAX ATTACKS, Remember them?
Where did the ANTHRAX ATTACKS come from?
What happened to Bruce Edwards Ivins? BRUCE EDWARDS IVINS?
Died 'mysteriously, conveniently'
US Army, Fort Detrick, Maryland. ANTHRAX ATTACKS
You Do Remember The ANTHRAX ATTACKS??
PikeSdream 2 years ago
O'Reilly, you crossed the line into hate the day you first opened your mouth
electricneedleroom 2 years ago 11
Conspiracy theorists always want us to back up our facts when they just make shit up that they "believe" is true. I accept facts of beliefs any day.
bringinhomesara 2 years ago
I love O' Reilly this conspiracy theorists can learn a thing or two from this true American patriot.
bringinhomesara 2 years ago
also remember Bill O'Reilly is paid big money to lie......
brokencasket 2 years ago
I would like to buy Rosie and Charlie a beer, and beat the crap out of bill o reilly, James Meigs and Michelle Malkin
SLEEPy2k16 2 years ago
Popular Mechanics did not use scientific evidence at all ... LIES LIES LIES!
Who is this guy? Fritz
stoovil666 2 years ago 2
who "crossed the line"? the mass media did. SHUT IT OFF people!! you don't need this garbage. you can hook up your TV to the internet and at least have some chance of being truthfully informed, then never even for a second flip to regular TV, simple as that! if there's shows/movies you like, just find a good torrent site and say goodbye to commercials while you're at it. just saying in case anyone out there still watches network TV, which is nothing more than a hypnosis tool.
tigros999 2 years ago
an uniformed populus is a populus living in slavery
stig422 2 years ago
owned thomas jefferson style
stig422 2 years ago
LOLOLOL, 911 truth has been debunked? by popular mechanics?
lmfao.
antivirusdesign 2 years ago
That's right, you can't handle it, so laugh.
ArrowHead83 2 years ago
lol at not being able to handle it
antivirusdesign 2 years ago
Alright, you want to get serious?
Show me where Popular Mechanics was wrong about 9/11.
ArrowHead83 2 years ago
this could take a while because they were wrong about pretty much everything. you start, tell me something they said that was true?
antivirusdesign 2 years ago
No, you start by telling me what they said that was wrong. You're the one making the accusation. You back it up.
ArrowHead83 2 years ago
Comment removed
antivirusdesign 2 years ago
Well for starters...
one of the guys on their panel that wrote the article
was a cousin of the head of homeland security...
johnnytrixter 2 years ago
"I do not read a single newspaper, & I feel infinitely the happier for it. The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads newspapers." -Thomas Jefferson
eddieguerrero2000 2 years ago 3
What's sad is that my cousin living in NY thinks Fox is balanced.
This is pretty much propaganda. :(
Germans thinks US threatens peace b/c Rosie said so?! wtf?! I didn't know she was that persuasive.
bananian 2 years ago
Fox isn't balanced, but neither is NBC, ABC, MSNBC, CNN etc. all have their propaganda. Rosie was the worst possible person to speak about 9/11, she wanted the spotlight; rather than applying the actual facts. 9/11 should be investigated and there is a lot evidence about the 9/11 truth, people like Alex Jones and Jason Bermas use facts to support their argument.
sean20t 2 years ago
The one thing Rosie was right about was the media, but everything she said was ludicrous. She's a left nut, O'Reilly is a right nut and Jones is just a hack. His so-called evidence are cherry picked and he chose to see the 'similarities' in videos when there are way more differences in them. The only thing similar about his videos were that both buildings fall to the ground.
bananian 2 years ago
We can go hours about the two towers, but logically explain how building number 7 fell under 8 seconds; In the 9/11 report out of 185 pages only couple of sentences were about building number 7, and claimed it collapsed in 18 seconds, not true. I just want an answer, becasue their are too many unanswered questions what happened that day. I don't want to believe it, but what if.
sean20t 2 years ago
I just don't see how the conspiracy theory comes closer to an answer.
bananian 2 years ago
This is the problem, people assume it's conspiracy, because we the people want to investigate more about it, because the government won't answer the questions. Think about it, watch Arron Russo 9/11 and tell me something is not right.
sean20t 2 years ago
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth
Patriots Question 9/11
Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
Scientists - Journal of 9/11 Studies
Researchers - Complete 911 Timeline
Here a bunch of 5th graders
npf2135 2 years ago
OK a bunch of 6th graders.........against the experts.....
NIST
911 Commission
FEMA
AIA
ASCE
911morontwoofer 2 years ago
Too many still live in denial though. I wonder after the revolution how many of the treasonous "debunkers" will be rounded up, tried and executed for their crimes of aiding and abetting mass murderers
npf2135 2 years ago
Popular Mechanics = Deceitful Liars
The evidence is overwhelming.
See for yourself how they lied about the "Offical" story of 9/11
PeaceIsRad 2 years ago
It would be nice if the title was correct. How about Orielly vs Rosie
b24line 2 years ago
I find it absolutely staggering.... that above the line "Talking points - commentary"
you have:
"That nonsense has been debunked. O'Donnell and sheen are doing this because they hate Bush"
Exactly at what point are you people going to see this PROPOGANDA!?
There is no talking point with Fox. Just a whitewash and propoganda that you people swallow.
Wake up sheeple
marcoddy 2 years ago
Popular Mechanics = Deceitful Liars
The evidence is overwhelming.
See for yourself how they lied about the "Offical" story of 9/11
PeaceIsRad 2 years ago
911 twoofers = Gullible morons who need to repeat grades 5-12.
The SCIENCE is overwhelming that 911 was an OUTSIDE JOB!
911morontwoofer 2 years ago
PeaceIsRad 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OK a bunch of 6th graders.........against the experts.....
NIST
911 Commission
FEMA
AIA
ASCE
911morontwoofer 2 years ago
It was an outside job. Done by the same country that slaughtered 34 US sailors aboard the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967. Do the research.
911Jedi 2 years ago
i know im being super paranoid but when they are talking like they do its like they have a gun pointed at theier head
rstar09 2 years ago
michelle malkin is a crazy bitch. This whole video was a giant personal attack on Rosie, as if she is any representation of the Controlled demolition theory. How dare her call our government murders! I mean, they've only been caught executing false flag terror time after time.. Maby O'reilly should read the Northwoods Document. Maybe have David Ray Griffin on the show? Fair and balanced my ass. Talk about propaganda
xXTheRatXx 2 years ago
It is funny that O'reilly would stand by their work, beings they won't even stand by their own! "I dare abc to put on the editors of popular mechanics to put the people strait". That's a good idea! We could have a big debate. Such a debate has infact already been suggested... however, neither NIST or PM have the balls to debate men like David Ray Griffin. They know the official conspiracy can not stand up to scrutiny. entering the "hate club". What about the "hate" the 1st ammendment club?
xXTheRatXx 2 years ago
This is YellowJournalisimpalooza! I find it sad that idiots like O'reilly and PM are so diluted, that they continually use the word 'conspiracy theory' one sidedly, as a derogatory term, all while being ignorant that there own theory is a conspiracy! And it is an irrational conspiracy theory, as apposed to the controlled demolition theory. "scientific evidence that is beyond dispute"?? that is laughable. PM's book is unscholarly garbage. Refuted by "debunking 911 debunking".
xXTheRatXx 2 years ago
first off popular mechanics has been prooven wrong many times, every one should read Griffin's book debunking 911 dubunking
j10mo 2 years ago
9/11 conspiracy people are idiots. They havn't proven shit. And never will. Period.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
haha wow i like how you just disproved nothing
j10mo 2 years ago
Pick a topic. Any topic. I'll gladly debate you. I have reaserch stand down, foreknowledge, the hijackers etc....Trust me, there is an explanation for everything.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
ok how do you explain the phone calls that were made from flight 93 (the cell phone calls) even though a american airlines eployee said they didnt even have air phones on that plane
j10mo 2 years ago
Is that your'e evidence?Someone says something and you automatically believe it. Why don't you tell that to the airphone operators who took those calls? That employee probaly has never been on a plane. Unless he gives you 100% proof it's just his opinion.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
haha no thats not all that was just an interesting quote i saw, but what i can tell you is that at least 4 of the calls made from flight 93 were from cell phones, and in 2001 it was impossible to call from a cell phone at 30,000 feet going 500miles an hour, and you said you could give me an eplanation for anything so give me one
j10mo 2 years ago
Is your opinion based on Project Achilles? Which is seriously flawed. Cells work when in low population areas. Which is why the cell calls were made. Most were dropped if you look at the transcripts. that conspiracy nut(is he impartial in his "study") flew over London. Something he doesn't tell you. Got another one.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
No first off its not an opinion and second no it is not based off of project achilles, what it is based of is the science writer A.K. Dewdney (a former professor of mathmatics and computer science) who did an experiment to test whether or not you could use a cell phone from an airliner at the altitude flight 93 was at and found it impossible (short version) he did many other test proving that the calls had to be fabricated, you can look it up if you like
j10mo 2 years ago
NIST's own experiments on structural steel don't match their theory
ziggy293 2 years ago
Michelle malkin needs a fucking slap
she should get back into the kitchen, and bill o'reilly is, has, and will always act like a knob end
Dagvalda 2 years ago
o'reilly and those 2 bitches are tools
Michkuty 2 years ago
Bill o is a MORON...and Michelle Malkin is a scumbag, how do these people keep their jobs, oh I know dumbass American citizens who think these people are smart.
borat443 2 years ago
why doesnt bill attack jesse ventura?
cbr890 2 years ago
he should go after jesse ventura.
gabledorf 2 years ago
jesse ventura hes a patriot ,even thought hes little crazy lol
Delta2099 2 years ago
this is all propaganda are you people Blind. Check this
/watch?v=mzXX_UgDhgo
ParanoidAndroid001 2 years ago
In the war against propaganda, i'd like to name the first target: Bill O'Reilly.
Drariel1012 2 years ago
omg Bill is retard and co! See the true! IDIOTS!!
Akesson1986 2 years ago
Watch:
LOOSE CHANGE FINAL CUT
Popular Mechanics are self appointed "experts" and they're only experts in lying propaganda.
TheParadigmShift 2 years ago
What a bunch of cia paid propagandist!
wow just wow!
BTW, I actually respect Rossie for doing this
Puppytime31 3 years ago
ill say it again. 911 truthers are a joke. its sad that hate can let people get themselves exploited like this.
gabledorf 2 years ago
Why is everybody that disagrees with the childish 911 thruthmovement paid by the CIA? It's like you guys think that everyone who believes the official story somehow knows that it actually was an "inside job" and that we are all under CIA's payroll to keep our mouth shut, wouldn't that be risky and very expensive? The truth movement, is dead, and it has always been dead, the message is so dumb, it doesn't even deserve to be called a movement
Horjan 2 years ago
i agree with what he says at 4:03
"There has never been a SUCCESSFUL media person in the history of this country that has crossed the line into 'hate' "
ahhh...what a democracy we have!
He just admitted a successful media person has to take it up the ass and like it.
JSSTyger 3 years ago
I was doing some research today and found something interesting.
Google Christopher Bollyn 911 planes flew directly into secure computer rooms
The whole NE section of the 81st floor of the south tower was stocked with "batteries" that were never used. And they were set in place in the SUMMER PRIOR TO 911.
Well well well...What floor did the plane "strike" on? What side of the building?
JSSTyger 3 years ago
The fact that they go so far as to get personal and call CT'ers kooky crackpots tells me this has all been typed up by somebody else. I'm sorry but Michelle Malkin would have needed permission to talk as much smack as she is.
Keep kissing ass FOX.
JSSTyger 3 years ago
The one from JSSTyger about popular mechanics. They should stick to building a better birdhouse.
mikebuhroo 3 years ago
Thanks.
I just love the "Nevermind...that nonsense has been debunked by Popular Mechanics using SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT IS BEYOND DISPUTE" ROTFLLLL
Somebody is doing some SERIOUS ASS KISSING
JSSTyger 3 years ago
O'Reilly needs to SHUT UP!!! hahaha
livefastdieyoung26 3 years ago
O'Reilly is a wankjob.
I can't believe he calls her a 'hater' - in what way did asking questions of the government make her a 'hater'.
The asian girl is a gobshite - indeed she seemed to be to be a 'hater' if I am to think some folk are.
Indeed, is Bill-O not a 'hater' as well as the winner of Wank of the Year 2008, I believe his 6th year on the bounce! what a guy.
FOX News - fucking lying bastards, meant to broadcast - not set themselves up as lying haters, eh bill - now feck off to iran
thenewvoice8 3 years ago 3
MSM propaganda at it's best.
Louaner 3 years ago
Some people are just fucking stupid like those in the clip. wake up you fucking wankers.lets make a fucking war against them assholes.
LovethatHouse 3 years ago
"Some people are just fucking stupid"..."wake up you wankers".."lets make a fucking war against them assholes." -----lol...I mean come on, Do i need to say anyrhing else? You sir, should not be allowed to procreate..
vrrevolt07 3 years ago
Why is the research beyond dispute? Because it's Popular Mechanics. They had some kid about 12 years old with no experience other than a couple lightweight articles about small aircraft research the book. Now they won't even let him appear on talk T.V. or radio ( His name is Davin Colburn) cause he keeps getting owned and making Pop. Mech. look stupid. Not that O'reily is any more credible. Mr just shut uo and do what your told or your a traitor.
mikebuhroo 3 years ago
the research is indisputable. not just because of popular mechanics. anyone who believes 911 was a planned demo has lost their mind. these people let their extreme hate blind them from clear truth.
gabledorf 3 years ago
popular mechanics is a joke, their collapse theory has us believe trusses provide the majority of lateral support for the WTC inner columns not steel beams, their sagging truss theory is implausible because they completely ignore the fact that the floors do not just sit on the trusses but are rigidily attached to them.
try researching a little further than just trusting what you are told on FOX news for gods sake.
sunovdismad 2 years ago
you are being exploited by the 911 truth movement. fox news is not the sole voice of opposition to this. not one major university worldwide supports your crazy views. even al jazerra has dismissed this movement as a joke. if you ever feel the need to seek out actual information (as opposed to your pitiful propaganda) i could direct you.
gabledorf 2 years ago
research the design of the twin towers, you will find what I have stated is correct.
sunovdismad 2 years ago
so u must have researched what gague steel the trusses were, and how much weight was above the damaged areas. im sure you understand things like point load. or maby your being exploited by people who use convincing sounding arguments. how was it that not one shred of evidence was ever uncovered by cleanup crews? why does even al jazerra dismiss the truth movement as fantasy? how does not one major demo company or publication agree with you?
gabledorf 2 years ago
Other than thermite and cut steel beams(which were found) what do you expect to be found at ground zero to suggest controlled demolition?
let me ask you why was 80% of the steel scrapped without being examined.without being subjected to detailed analysis.
and why were clean up workers told it was completely safe to work at ground zero, and now a high percentage of them a suffering from serious respiratory serious disorders?
Could it be that the Government actually lie to the public?
sunovdismad 2 years ago
yeah ive heard the cut beams and the thermite argument, and ive also seen video of the same beams being cut. thermite dosent explode it only burns. you are being lied to about the steel never being examined. why hasnt the fdny, nypd, fbi, cia, faa, or any major university worldwide taken on your cause, especially considering how many of their friends died that day. who you rely on for info are lying extremists. thats why you believe it. you ignore everyone except a select few who support 1 view
gabledorf 2 years ago
there are hundreds of qualified engineers, architects, scientists not to mention firefighters who are part of scholars for 911 truth. yet to make yourself feel better you like to refer to them as lying extremist kooks.
the cia and fbi??? lol!, now there's a some trust worthy organizations, try reading "killing hope" by william blum.
sunovdismad 2 years ago
fdny? nypd? faa? all lying huh? tens of thousands of people?
gabledorf 2 years ago
"fdny? nypd?"
As i said there are plenty of firefighters and yes even some policeman who are part of the truth movement.
sunovdismad 2 years ago
some is the key word. always some crazies in any grouping. a more accurate way of saying it is very few. you are being exploited by low budget filmmakers. you actually believe that you have a rightful place in debate. loony bin is where people loike you belong
gabledorf 2 years ago
yeah you witness a building WTC7 symmetrically collapse and free fall speed and believe it was caused by a small isolated fire, and I am the loony
this demonstrates you are so weak minded that you could be convinced that 1+1=3. no matter, Natural selection will eliminate your kind soon enough.
sunovdismad 2 years ago
so dummy, how do you explain how fdny chief of operations daniel nigro took a team of engineers to building 7 took readings with heat sensing equipment measured the building with a transit and determined it would fall, hours before it fell. is the fdny part of the coverup? are they covering for the people that murdered their friends? or maby you have no idea how to seperate facts from lying propaganda (a symptom of stupidity) i got plenty of real facts at my disposal. you are being exploited.
gabledorf 2 years ago
here are the facts, Do you have any idea what it takes for a building to collapse in the manner it did, heres a hint - a simultaneous failure of multiple lower key support columns, that's why we have controlled demolition teams, according to your logic we could just start small fire in a building.
cmon man, you cannot possibly be this dumb??
sunovdismad 2 years ago
according to the fdny it was much more than a small fire that took down bld 7. i know you believe that they were in on it, but people with any degree of common sense understand that no one is covering for people who murdered their friends. did you know that bld 7 shared its foundation with the towers? did you know that it had 20,000 tons of diesel fuel in its basement? did you know that building 7 was built spanning a subway and a power station? or maby you have no clue about what you are saying
gabledorf 2 years ago
speaking of common sense, do you have any idea how fire resistant structural steel is. here is a hint - its at least 10X thicker that that thin frying pan you use to cook, yet how long would it take for your frying pan to weaken if you held it over an open flame???? 10 years, 100 years, 10000000000 years perhaps?
1=1=2 not 3
sunovdismad 2 years ago
i see so we should ignore the actual science and replace it with an analogy involving a frying pan. i told you that you would not be able to answer how the fdny predicted the collapse hours before it fell. by the way when you cant even define fact it makes it real hard to formulate an argument. you are being exploited by low budget filmmakers on u tube. im sure your still proud though
gabledorf 2 years ago
"i see so we should ignore the actual science and replace it with an analogy involving a frying pa"
no amount of science can prove that 1+1=3 unless you are a complete imbecile. forget the frying pan and try the holding a piece of structural steel over an open flame, and see how long it takes to weaken.
you are being exploited by your own weak mind
sunovdismad 2 years ago
guess what different fires burn at different temperatures. office fires will sometimes burn at 2500 deg F. to make structural steel bend requires a temperature of 1200 deg F, it will also expand in length about 30% at those temperatures. thats the actual science (as opposed to your "proven" frying pan science) you obviously cant answer any of my questions about the fdny evaluations of bld 7. im done humoring stupidity. good luck with your handicap
gabledorf 2 years ago
the color of the flames do not indicate a fire that exceeded the temperature of a blow torch
BTW your fdny question is irrelevant if it is demonstrated that the building could not of collapsed in the manner it did.
sunovdismad 2 years ago
actually office fires have NEVER burned that hot with the most optimal oxygen ratio, and to weaken steel it takes 790deg f, so you need to look into your science
j10mo 2 years ago
your being exploited for your stupidity.
gabledorf 2 years ago
haha why because i am right?
j10mo 2 years ago
how big does this conspiracy get? are you saying that the cell phone companies doctored their records? what your implying is that tens of thousands of normal everyday americans where seamlessly involved without it being leaked beforehand. am i right?
gabledorf 2 years ago
no? what i am saying is that the 911 commission report has been prooven false many times and "americasfan" wanted me to give him a topic to debate so i thought of the most simplest thing which happen to be the cell phone calls, sopposedly there were calls made from flight 93 made by cell phones (as it says in the report) well it has been proven to be impossible to do that in 2001
j10mo 2 years ago
its not proven. you just believe everything you have been told by your exploiters. why arent the cell phone companies speaking up? are the family members lying about talking to their dead loved ones? i bet you cant explain these things to me in a normal logical way.
gabledorf 2 years ago
well your response is anything but scientific it is backed up by nothing, you have not disproved my statement that you cannot call from an airliner at 30,000 feet in 2001, it is a scientific FACT that you cannot and that is why popular machanics ommited it completly out of its report, and i have been told by exploiters? is that your argument?
j10mo 2 years ago
Mark Binghama and Tom Burnett cancelled their flights from the day before. How did the government copy their voice on just short notice? One lady called hers sister and gave her the combination number of her safe where she kept her will in her closet. How did the government know she had a will, where it was, and what the combination number was? How did the government copy their personality traits?
AmericasFan 2 years ago
Oh so you are saying you can call from an airliner traveling at 500mph at 34,000+ feet and get through? if this was possible then why would american airlines put thousands opon thousands of dollars in a new technology (pico cell) in 2004 to make it possible to use a cell phone on a jet airliner? then the ceo of AA said " commercial availability of cell phone use in flight is approximately 24months away" hmm thats interesting since you thought you were already able to do so
j10mo 2 years ago
enjoy oz! you have no concept of reality.
gabledorf 2 years ago
and you have no concept of english, i have beaten you and now your crying like a baby back BITCH suck it! 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB
j10mo 2 years ago
you have selective reasoning. only things that support your stupid theories is considered, in the way you think. truth is you cant handle a real debate with me ( a symptom of your stupidity)
gabledorf 2 years ago
hahaha you just did debate me and lost, you cant handle loosing to me, and i dont have selective reasoning i have alot of sources that support my claim, you have not disprooved anything i have said soo admit your loss and moove on
j10mo 2 years ago
u have three sources 1) loose change 2) scholars for 911 truth 3) alex jones. you are being exploited by these groups. the fact that you cant see past this shows that you are part of the most gullable of all people.
gabledorf 2 years ago
Did i mention a single one of those ever....NO i did not, but since you dont know what to say and you connot beat me your trying to put words in my mouth and make assumptions
j10mo 2 years ago
so tell me, who is it thats exploiting you and making you believe these fantasies. As a member of society (who is not mentally challenged) i can clearly understand the methods that are being used to fool you.
gabledorf 2 years ago
See this is what you dont get nobody is "exploiting" me or any one else on the fact that it is an inside job, there no reason to, there is no agenda, nothing to accomplish but telling ppl the truth, but on the other hand if you look at what you believe and are being told you are the one being "exploited"
j10mo 2 years ago
Because the demand was there you idiot. Cell phones at that elevation didn't work well. They did work however. The transcripts reveal alot of dropped calls. When the plane was in a low population area it worked longer than in high population.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
Well obviously you think they did work because that what they said but as it has been pointed out it was IMPOSSIBLE so the calls had to be fabricated, its that simple, it couldnt work no matter what
j10mo 2 years ago
you are being exploited. loose change cost almost nothing to produce but it grossed tens of millions. the more people that these groups can fool the more money they get. because somone who sounds official tells you something dosnt mean its not a marketing ploy. you are very bad at seperating cult marketing ploys from actual legitimate sources of truth.
gabledorf 2 years ago
yea and thats why i can go on google video and watch loose change as manny times as i want for free, you are a moron
j10mo 2 years ago
its funny being called a moron by somone who is stupid enough to be exploited by the 911 truth marketing scheme. and yes loose change grossed tens of millions (look it up if you can muster the mental capacity)
gabledorf 2 years ago
Ok now the argument has changed to if loose change made money or not, even though you can watch it for free and in the movie it says burn it and distribute it you still believe they made millions, Dillon Dunbar (director) is not a millionare no matter how many times you say it, since you are such a computer wiz why dont you send me the link showing how much money it grossed, YOU FUCK TARD SIGHT YOUR SOURCES! you keep going in a circle and not aclomplishing anything
j10mo 2 years ago
*cite
j10mo 2 years ago
loose change was in the movie theatres and people paid to go see it ( some things i just dont need to cite) just look it up. (it grossed tens of millions just like i said) you are citing sources that have 0 credibility because you have no clue how to seek information. if your cell phone conspiracy is your strongest proof then you are putting out quite a pitiful argument. (symptom of your utter stupidity)
gabledorf 2 years ago
Ok first off it was not in any of the main movie theatres at all maybe little personaly owned ones, and if you choose to believe it made a bunch of money then so be it but i know it didnt, i know where the guy works that made it and he is not a millionare, second about the cell phone claim if you would of read a few comments back you would of seen why i started there,
j10mo 2 years ago
i could bring up plunny of other evidence and arguments to but i figured that would be the simplest one to put, and just because you have no argument and cannot proove other wise doesnt mean that it is a pitiful argument, i used the cell phones because it was a blatant lie in the commission report and it disproves its credability
j10mo 2 years ago
see the problem is you think that your sources are citing factual information. what your really doing is getting fooled because you dont know enough to seperate a marketing ploy from actual investigatigations. its real easy to go on u tube and find wackos who will propigate these stories. its a good way to weed out the mentally challenged (im talking about you)
gabledorf 2 years ago
First off you dont know anything about me so dont try to turn the argument into a personal thing, i listed those facts, and they are facts, acording to you, you believe that ppl that give facts are mentaly challenged, and stop trying to use your marketing ploy theory because it is just your opion and backed by nothing, unlike what i say which is factual evidence
j10mo 2 years ago
they are not facts dummy. you are being exploited. hope your proud of yourself.
gabledorf 2 years ago
this is a fucking circle argument thats all u fucking have!! you are being exploited exploited exploited,. and you saying they arnt facts doesnt make them not facts...lol
j10mo 2 years ago
you dont deserve my explanation of how insanely stupid you are being. you are a low life who is spitting in the face of every rescuer who was there that day. i have plenty of facts and common sense evaluations of what happned that day. you dont have the capacity to handle this type of information. you need to watch discovery channel for a while. leave political (if u want to call what u do political) talk to the people with some sort of context.
gabledorf 2 years ago
Well that was an easy cop out, yea and you dont deserve my time explaining how much of a retard you are, wow i can do it to
j10mo 2 years ago
in order for what you have benn fooled into believing to be true. 1) hundreds of security personnel at three different aiports would have had to completely change a whole days worth of security footage unnoticed. (impossible) 2) the rescue workers that were at ground zero, who watched their friends die, would all have to be lying for the government to cover up for their friends murderers. (you are a piece of dog crap who has no concept of reality, and no real answer to these two points)
gabledorf 2 years ago
no all they would have to do is confiscate the footage and that isnt to hard since they did near the pentagon, and for the ppl watching thier friends die that isnt even rellivent since i never mentioned they had fake deaths? i really dont understand where you are goin with this
j10mo 2 years ago
the footage was never confiscated it was handed over to the federal government. the fottage remains the property of airport security. no men in black came in and took it. you dont think your arguments out to well, do you? the fdny would have known about bombs taking down the buildings (if that fantasy story were true) the official reason those buildings fell, according to the fdny, was due to massive fire and structural damage.
gabledorf 2 years ago
Well they did take the footage look it up and they have only released like 3 of the 80 videos taken that day so yes they could do the same thing in an airport, and fdny heard the explosions to and told ppl to get out because the building was coming down, and for the fire theory it is impossible and even if it was every collem would of had to fail at the same time, and it wouldnt of fallen straight down through the path of most resistance, it would of fallen to the side
j10mo 2 years ago
all you are is a parrot of truther lies. the fdny predicted the fall of building 7 hours before the actual collapse. did they see the bombs and then make up an elaborate lie to cover up for the same people who murdered their friends? you cant give me any answer except truther propaganda, which is laughed at by all of academia. you are being exploited like i said. and believe me ,i know, you wont grow a brain anytime soon. this type of behavior will hurt you in life
gabledorf 2 years ago
answer me u coward
gabledorf 2 years ago
If they didn't work where the hell are the cell companies confirming this and questioning the calls. Only 2 calls were on cell phones the rest on the airphones.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
Well that shows your credibility, there were not airphones on flight 93, and for the cell phone companies they didnt have to confirm anything since it was impossible to call in the first place, your argument is weak, i state facts and you dispute nothing
j10mo 2 years ago
Cell phones work well. If you did your research you would know what phone calls were made and from where and how long they lasted. Why aren't the cell companies the least bit suspicious about the cell calls being made at high altitudes? both phone calls made from flight 93 were at around 25,000 feet in a low population area. Thats when they work at it's best. Cell calls don't work as good on high altituded but the lower the better.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
You are telling me to do my research? When the calls were made the plane was around 32,000ft and then climbed to over 40,000ft, that is documented fact by the air trafic controllers that day, see this is why i hate arguing with morons they can never get anything right, if you were to look up the test that show what you can and cant do by Dewdney you come to a conclusion that it is impossible to call from an airliner at that altitude and speed
j10mo 2 years ago
First,that idiot dewdney believed in a conspiracy even before the test.he wouldn't have a hidden bias would he?Second, he flew over heavy populated areas.Third,the cell companies work pretty good in very low populated areas.If you look at the timeline, the length of each call(only 2 on cell phones)and several other factors you would know that.But no you have to believe people who believe in a conspiracy.His work has serious flaws.Screw loose change and 911 myths debunk that stupid study.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
Well to point out the first flaw in your comment he was not bias he simply examined the evidence and came to a conclusion that is not debatable, and your low population areas agrument is irrelivent because your 30,000+ft in the air and it wouldnt matter anyway, and for the 2 calls? what are you talking about, there were 13 calls made- News reports (San Diego, 2001), (BBC, 2001), (Telegraph, 2001), i would like you to cite your source of 2 calls
j10mo 2 years ago
proven*
j10mo 2 years ago
two 1 1/2 cent coins would = 3 cents so in that case 1+1 does equal 3. maby you should expand your thinking. the box your thinking in is pretty limited
gabledorf 2 years ago
dear lord, I was not referring coins, I was referring to numerical values
sunovdismad 2 years ago
you cant explain how the fall was predicted hours before it fell can u? you have no background in science engineering architecture, or any other related field. you rely on propagandist posts on u tube for your info. good luck dealing with your handicap. it must be easy to selectively choose pieces of info to support your vievs. it just isnt a legitimate way to research. again you can never explain the fdny prediction can u? (and actually not sound retarted)
gabledorf 2 years ago
ive done my research. im glad im smart enough to not get myself exploited like you.
gabledorf 2 years ago