Scriabin Reverie op. 49 n. 3 for piano (sequence)

[rgrannell1]

Not a midi, but a little too dissonant for me. Usually a fan of scriabin

[darandar17]

I think that this is a good piece, but who plays this should play it slowly, it´s too fast, and there is no expression. The piece should be played in PIANO, and all the time is fortissimo.

[darandar17]

I think that this is a good piece, but who plays this should play it slowly, it´s too fast and there is no expression.

[fedaykin6]

fucking crap midi

[travelsbypiano]

@fedaykin6 astonishingly helpful and wonderfully refined comment indeed

[chameleodon]

this is a fucking midi lol

[travelsbypiano]

LOL that's why I wrote (sequence) in the title!! ROTFLMAO :-)

P.S. seriously now, check out the video response from ScriabinFanatic, it's really good.

[ScriabinFanatic]

lol this aint right at all :(

It is sooooooo fast with no rubato at all.

thebloads I think this performance give a wrong impression.

[travelsbypiano]

lol, I even slowed down from the original tempo (which is 88 bpm) and I did add a little bit of rubato but I guess it wasn't enough... unfortunately I don't have any recording of this piece, which is why I posted a sequence in the first place. I can't find any recording of his Concert Allegro op.18 and Impromptu op 12 n. 1 either.

I know this performance doesn't cut it. But I posted it anyway, hoping this would spur someone to POST a better interpretation... no luck I guess.

[ScriabinFanatic]

I will post a version I have on CD soon.

[thebloads]

Im sorry . but is this a reverie or anti-reverie?