California Earthquake Prediction for September 18, 2009

[ISHITY0SMITY]

My B-day. All of 22. No big Qwake that day.

[Marztech5]

I predict it'll be in your state.

[kentaappel]

But if there is anything planetary conjuction connections, then in 2009 Jupiter and Neptune were at their closest line ups on May 27, July 9, and December 21 of that year so check and see if that was the case. My feeling is there weren't any.

[followingtheplanets]

@kentaappel

"so check and see if that was the case. My feeling is there weren't any."

Once again, research is NOT your strong point I see:

05 28 - Offshore Honduras - M 7.3 Fatalities 7

07 15 - Off West Coast of the South Island, New Zealand - M 7.8

07 09 - Yunnan, China - M 5.7 Fatalities 1

12 19 - Taiwan - M 6.4

Earth passed between the sun and Jupiter & Neptune from Aug 13-18

08 17 - Southwestern Ryukyu Islands, Japan - M 6.7

08 16 - Kepulauan Mentawai region, Indonesia - M 6.7

[followingtheplanets]

@kentaappel

The point of the video was that I was predicting an uptick in California quakes at that new moon. The Calexico quake Sept 19th was the largest quake in California up to that point that year. It initiated the last cluster of large Cali-quakes. I have sent you the link to my vid about the next cluster and when that will begin - 2015.

[kentaappel]

Besides, the sun, the moon, and the planets are never in a particular constellation as they are merely in the same line of sight with stars that are trillions of miles in the distance that are not even related to each other as the stars of say, for example, Leo the Lion, are also trillions of miles apart from each other, hence have no relationship to each other. So if we could get to the closest star of Leo we would not be in Leo but at that star with the others very far off in the distance.

[followingtheplanets]

@kentaappel

"Leo the Lion, are also trillions of miles apart from each other, hence have no relationship to each other"

Kent. It is just a naming convention used for determining celestial longitudes. If I say A conjoins B in X degrees of Y constellation, I am NOT saying that A and B are related to Y but to each other by being at the same celestial longitude. You are trying to make issues that don't exist. You argument relates to nothing.

[weatherbill7]

this is quite possible. One prophecy states that there will be a 2 to 3 week time frame between the tsunami and mega quake to hit cali

maybe the tsunami hits sept 3rd and the mega quake around sept 18th

[dcsymbols]

"this is quite possible."

Genius - The ttile reads 2009. That quake already happened. Try reading the info section and the comments Bill.

[Ax3caliburr]

@weatherbill7

nope weatherbill, this was a a fail. so no more prophecies for you. these are all natural causes.

[dcsymbols]

"nope weatherbill, this was a a fail."

Genius - do u not realized that this video was posted in Dec of 2008 and relates to September of 2009 and NOT 2010?? Read the comments sometime.

If u read u will see that the 5.1 quake in Calexico on Sept 19, 2009 was the largest quake in California up to that time in 2009. It was the first quake in the series that resulted in the 7.2 Baja quake on April 4th.

If u check your ephemeris, u will find that Jupiter conjoined Neptune on Sept 19, 2009.

[kentaappel]

@dcsymbols Jupiter was not in conjuction with Neptune on Sept 19, 2009 as it they were six degrees apart in the night sky, not a close line up really. I looked it up in my astronomy planetarium program called "Orion The Sky"

Also, if you using astrology, you probably think that Jupiter and Neptune were in Pisces when in fact it was, in the actual sky, in Aquarius. Astrologers don't even have the positions in the sky correct.

[followingtheplanets]

@kentaappel

"I believe that the main point of the video was to high light the sun, Saturn and Uranus.

If you read my stuff about California quakes you will see that I say that California quakes happen near Jupiter/Neptune conjunctions. Quite the debunker aren't you Kent.

"Astrologers don't even have the positions in the sky correct."

That's like saying the USGS doesn't have the time of quakes correct since it uses UTC and not local time. You are a real dull one.

followingtheplanets

[kentaappel]

@followingtheplanets Yes, it is important that the positions in the sky that astrologers referrece are wrong because, as in the case of the Sept. 19, 2009 positions in the sky of Neptune and Jupiter we can look up at the sky and see that those planets were in Aquarius and not, as the astrologers say, in Pisces. The same thing with the so called new moon in Pisces, the moon is actually also in Aqaurius and not Pisces.

[weatherbill7]

this is quite possible. One prophecy states that there will be a 2 to 3 week time frame between the tsunami and mega quake to hit cali

maybe the tsunami hits sept 3rd and the mega quake around sept 18th

[MadelaineNevarez]

yea this never happened so clearly your wrong kid .

[dcsymbols]

"yea this never happened so clearly your wrong kid ."

24 year old genius-

Huh? Look up the 5.1 Calexico quake of Sept 19, 2009. That was the largest quake in the state that year up to that time, and it was the quake that started the series of quakes that we are now seeing in California. Or you could have just read the comments.

BTW, I was a kid in 1957.

[KnowJesusKnowPeace]

@MadelaineNevarez 6.9 Gulf of California August 3, 2009 (USGS), plus, in the months before this prediction, there was a 5.1 Dec 6, 2008 & a 5.5 in LA on July 29th.

This astrology is not very convincing. The biggest complaint I have with the fulfillment is not it's being 1 day off. That's no problem. But, comparisons were made to major quakes caused by similar "alignments", eg New Madrid.

When the June 4, 2010 quake moved Calexico 31 feet, where were the planets?

A: no correlation?

[KnowJesusKnowPeace]

@KnowJesusKnowPeace 31 inches.

[dcsymbols]

"31 inches"

Right. NOT 31 feet. Like I say, try and get at least some of the facts straight.

[dcsymbols]

"When the June 4, 2010 quake moved Calexico 31 feet, where were the planets?"

Genius - get your facts straight. The Calexico quake that you speak of happened on April 4th. Jeez.

"A powerful earthquake moved a California city 31 inches! Calexico, Calif, right on the U.S.-Mexico border was moved by an earthquake that struck Baja California on April 4, 2010."

And Mercury and Venus were in conjunction then.

[puresickmermaid]

STOP PUTTING DATES and STOP PREDICTING! Whatever you have to say is canceled by your moronic thinking you know something the rest of us don't.

[dcsymbols]

"thinking you know something the rest of us don't"

Think? I don't think, I know that I know things that you don't know moron. You can tell by the way you write. I bet you can't even understand the video.

And the prediction was for a quake that already happened within hours of when I said it would.

See my April 6th quake video too.

[bondsly]

@puresickmermaid I wonder how you will feel if one of these predictions happen on one of these dates or close to one of these dates then who will be the moran the bible says in the end times earthquakes would be more frequent and they are happening more now than in the previous decades one of these prdictions could happen just by chance now adays.

[ChaseWN027]

I wonder what these idiots think when their predictions dont come true the day it suppose to happen?

[dcsymbols]

"I wonder what these idiots think when their predictions dont come true the day it suppose to happen? "

I wonder why geniuses like Chase don't watch videos, read the info or the comments before they comment.

You should watch and read first, THEN you pull down your pants and SHOW YER ASS Boy.

[bondsly]

@dcsymbols What will and idiot like you think when one of these predictions happen

[dcsymbols]

"What will and idiot like you think when one of these predictions happen"

Moron. Do you realize that the forecast that you are looking at was from 2009? If you read the comments you will find that the M 5.1 quake in Calexico on Sept 19, 2009 was the largest quake in 2009 in California up to that date?

Now what is your question?

You can also see my quake prediction for April 6th, 2009. That was the day of the quake in Italy.

[dcsymbols]

The March equinox was on the 20th and the moon was new on the 26th. There was a 7.6 r quake in the Tonga region on the 19th, and 4.8r quake near Bombay Beach, California on the 24th.

In September the equinox was on the 22nd, the new moon was the 18th, and the full moon was Oct 4th. There were 8.1 and 76.r quakes on Sept 29 and 30. Calexico saw 5.1 and 4.6r quakes on the 19th and 20th.

There was a 5.0r quake on the first of Oct, and a 5.2r on the third near Olancha, Calif.

[dcsymbols]

Sept 19 5.1 r Calexico

Please see the info area for a website where you can review southern California quakes for the year 2009 so far. I repeat, that's southern California.

The next largest quake occurred March 24 following the Vernal Equinox. The Calexico quake has happened just before Mercury conjoins the sun tonight.

Bigbytes

[packerfan10]

IT will be interesting to see. As someone who lives right on a subfault here in California I always have my guard up.

[JJJPaxton]

mmm... I'll keep it to see if it turns out to be true :D

[dcsymbols]

It would not surprise me if your prediction is correct.

If you look in the info section of this movie you will see a link to the web page related to this. On that page, I note what I consider causal events and try to point out that quakes can happen before, during or after those events.

With that said, while the main causal event this year will be the Sept 18 configuration, we are within a broader window established by the Pisces eclipses. We also have to consider eclipses and the tides.