@VishezzTv -- LuLZ, your comment is CLASSIC self-absorbed delusion that renounces common sense, evidence, verified facts, reason, logic, scientific principles, sworn testimony, historical precedent, research, experiment, verification, rigorous analysis & published accounts that contradict official 911 Theory in favor of faith-based conviction of belief & emotional 'certainty'. Its apparant your 911 knowledge is superficial since even MINIMAL study refutes dozens of core official points.
"Its apparant your 911 knowledge is superficial since even MINIMAL "
Studies by who? Did they have peer review? I doubt it.
There are 100s of trade organizations for the Aviation, Architecture and Civil Engineering community, and out of all those exist, not one, I repeat, NOT ONE has concluded the "official story" doesn't add up, not even organizations from other countries.
It's funny you claim reason, when the experts are not on your side.
Holy sh... it seems like everyone is an expert in building techniques, metal science and what not all of a sudden... Rosie O starts of with "I beleive"... and "I beleive" and then says "It is IMPOSSIBLE for a building..." talking of miracles, ranting ... i really fear people that listen to that kind of talk. I don't have an opinion... but noone should listen to this kind of rethoric. Pompous a**
@keifer420oz -- BuLLSHIT. In fact, YOUR comment reflects the kind of naive dumbed-down gullibility & willful stupidity that people around the world criticize the USA for being full of idiots. WHAT you so hostile to, that ANYONE dare suggest US Government is less than honest when it suits a geopolitical agenda? 911 Commission members THEMSELVES admitted many witnesses including CIA lied. ONLY someone who is either stupid or a gummint shill would say nothing about 'official' 911 theory STINKS.
@keifer420oz WELL IF IT WASNT AN INSIDE JOB THEN..........DOESNT THAT MAKE AMERICA STUPID,I MEAN BOX CUTTERS?MILES AND MILES INTO AMERICAN SPACE,WITHOUT ANY1 STOPING THEM.HITTING ALL THESE BIG TARGETS?LOL,IM AFRAID IT MAKES AMERICA LOOK STUPID AND DUMB ANY WAY U LOOK AT IT.
this was the coolest clip i've seen in awhile. So finally there is more than half the public believe that there is a cover-up? WTF are we all doing at war with the middle east? Shit is really fucked up when we know there is a problem and we continue to sit on our ass and do nothing....as people die, every day because of a falsified story that led the western world to war with the middle east. Just like before, every war before based on lies and deceit.
@JamesIsViolet -- So do tell, WHY would you be gleefully rolling around on the floor at the fact that more than half the nation sees thru the criminality of the ruling elites who have sold-out to corporations, wrecked the economy, overthrown our civil rights, engaged in ever-more reckless & unjustified military adventures, colluded in monstrous frauds, tells the public most outrageous lies, & have overseen the subversion of democracy with a Fascist Technocracy antithetical to truth & justice?
Dont take charlies word for it, take the word of thousands of experts in every related feild..ae 911 truth, pilots for 911 truth, vets for 911 truth etc etc
@asad24041992 You mean 985 dumb sheep liked this video. The flock does not know who the sheapard is... The REAL truth is the flock is actually lead by con artists who make stories up so they can make personal gain from it. They sell books, give lectures (which have entrance fees ofcourse), and even make appearances (for the right price) at conspiracy theory themed conventions. Look at how much people make by spreading this crap then come back and tell me they aren't just in it for the money.
@MrAwsome514 No i meant what i said 114 dumb sheeps liked this video.U should better find some answers to how Wtc 7 fell like being imploded in controlled demolition..This is just a senseless argument that the conspiracy theory is wrong just because some ppl are writing books on it ,the FACT is there are some proofs which are way more compelling then the official 9/11 story.
Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.(Adolf Hitler)
@asad24041992 suggest you go and watch a video of a controlled demolition... Be sure to listen very carefully. Those explosions can be heard for miles and sound like a carpet bombing... If any demolition charges had gone off that day we would have heard them very clearl in every video and ALL of the survivors that where anywhere near the tower would have gone deaf from it.
@MrAwsome514 Unfortunately for u i have seen a lot of controlled demolition videos so i know how much sound the demolition generates.U r horribly wrong denying a clear cut thing that the Wtc building fell exactly like a building in controlled demolitions by a senseless childish argument that it couldn't have been controlled demolition because the sound waves in controlled demolition are very high..U should better watch some controlled demolition videos
@asad24041992 Oh really? Because last I checked in a controlled demolition the supports on every floor are demolished at once causing the entire building to collapse at the same time. Yet in the WTC collapse the collapse starts at the floors that where hit and then the portion of the building above that falls into the ones below it. The lower floors don't begin to collapse untill the upper ones strike them. A dominoe style collapse does not happen in a controlled demolition.
@MrAwsome514 I think u r here with something .Ur argument are so senseless that they are making me think about ur mental condition..the Wtc demolished EXACTLY like a Building in controlled demolition ..First There is no steel building in the world which has demolished by small fires like Wtc 7 building has it is IMPOSSIBLE that the building had fallen otherwise than by demolition.I am talking at Wt7 not the twin towers
@asad24041992 The only thing the collapse of the WTC had in common with a controlled demolition was the direction they fell. In a controlled demolition every floor of the building collapses at once but in the WTC we see a dominoe effect collapse. No evidence of thermite was found at the scene... untill after truthers like you got their hands on pictured of beams the clean up crew where cutting with thermite charges so they could move them. Truthers knowingly misrepresent evidence all the time.
@MrAwsome514 Do u know how many ppl witnessed that there were blasts in the basements of both the building ?? Don't try to mix the case of Wtc 7 with the other two towers cause for them u have the excuse of plane hitting them ..There was termite found there which was still burning after days.How wtc fell to ground by some small fires in offices is a clear cut proof that all three building were imploded ..
@asad24041992 Also Unfortunately for you... You have failed to take into considerartion that setting up a controlled demolition in the towers would have taken months, thousands of pounds of explosive materials, and thousands of feet of det chord. You cannot set something like that up in an active office building with out it being blatantly obvious to EVERYONE. You certainly can't have it collapse and have none of those materials show up in the debris either.
@MrAwsome514 I think u haven't ever seen a controlled demolitions .It NEVER take months for controlled demolition ,common don't try to fool me ..Some weeks before 911 strange things happened in the building teams shutting down the security systems and its on record.Might be they used some other technique of controlled demolition just destroying the support columns.Thermite(used in controlled demolition) was found on the support columns which was still melting the steel
@asad24041992 To set up normally no it should only take weeks... To set up in an office building that is in active use on the other hand would take considerably longer. Also you have to take into account that two of these towers where amung the tallest in he world. between the planning and the positioning it would have taken at least 1 month if not allmost 2. No evidence of thermite was found. Truthers found pictures of beams cut with thermite by the clean up crew and claimed them to be evidence
@MrAwsome514 Don't try to fool me ..Go watch some videos to see how much time is needed to get a building down.U r making ur own assumptions.The planning might have took years okay ? so what ?
Its on record that those three buildings had teams there doing things which many of the ppl at twin towers found strage .Thermite was there and if u know what 'shape charges' are u can see that Girders melted by them watch?v=lv2ck2qsiGA
@MrAwsome514 The professionals all around the world who know how these buildings are made don't agree with the official story ..The proof which the conspiracy theorists give are way more compelling then the official story and the senseless claims like i can't be an controlled demolition because it creates so much sound ...Grow up my friend watch this video /watch?v=imMirryq6gQ
@asad24041992 "The professionals all around the world who know how these buildings are made don't agree with the official story"
I want names. Something that I can use to confirm weather or not these people are actually "Professionals". I happen to have several friends who are in the demolition buisness. All of which agree with the findings of the NIST report, and by the way much of my information comes from what I have learned from those friends.
@MrAwsome514 What a shame u don't even tried to know what the professionals all around the world say about it, don't try to fool urself ..Oh common the facts are very clear ..here is Dr.Stephen E Jones Phd explaining that the signs of Nano thermite (Which doesn't make much sound) after his analysis of some of the remains
watch?v=MwSc7NPn8Ok
I think u haven't watched the videos i sent ..There is a reply to the Nist report in the video i sent u previously
@MrAwsome514 Wtc 7 is a key for knowing what happened at 9/11 a 43 story building collapsed exactly like in controlled demolition and what u have in reply is that it can't be just because there wasn't enough decibels of sound ?! i have to be an idiot to believe in what u r saying is an answer to something which is very clear ..U should watch the documentary 'Loose change'
Member of Controlled Demolition Inc ( Worlds leading demolition company) saying that Wtc 7 collapse couldn't have been otherwise by EXPLOSIVES Inside ,watch the full videos
/watch?v=OcwnJTpholc
/watch?v=ns_hjONWZ88
he said symmetrical small blasts were used for the demolition ,u can clearly see them in this video at 0:44
@MrAwsome514 i will again say don't try to fool urself ..Ur arguments are weak and senseles.. its exactly what happens during a controlled demolition if u have ever seen it ..
The only one fooling themselves here is you. You have argued that explosives where set off in the basement of the towers and yet there is a major flaw with this theory. If there where explosives going off in the basement of each of the towers then why did the two main towers collapse starting from the top?
Honestly... even if I had the power to send you back in time so you could see it for yourself I still would not be able to convince you.
@MrAwsome514 u r fooling urself ..I have given u so many proofs .I have not just argued i have given u proofs of what i said ..Ur question showed how much u actually know about controlled demolition ..The explosives are set all around the supporting columns specially in the basement ..U r trying to mix everything, first there are witnesses who said about that blasts in the basement that doesn't mean that there were no blasts anywhere else .....
@asad24041992 You mean there where witnesses who reported sounds that they described as sounding LIKE explosions. It is very difficult to accurately identify sound.
I have watched the videos you have linked... and gotten quite a few laughs out of them.
@MrAwsome514 secondly the case of the twin towers is different to Wtc 7 don't try to mix them ..I have shown u what experts are saying on wtc 7 collapse ..
The problem is that u don't have anything as a strong argument so u r saying things like this ..I can say that to for u that if i had the power to send u back in time u still would have convinced ur self with the official story ..
@asad24041992 All you can do is refference other people's opinions. I don't even think you have an actual opinion of your own. You just let other people do your thinking for you. That is a very foolish thing to do.
@MrAwsome514 lolz they were experts opinion not my opinion .Things are very much clear but they are hard to accept i know ..All u have in reply to everyone is that there wasn't enough sound i am sure even its sound had made all the people in the city deaf u would have come with any other senseless argument ..
Those blasts were of Nano thermite Not Rdx which that Phd in Physics found in this analysis .
@asad24041992 You do realize this conspiracy theory only even exists because of 3 kids who got rejected from film school who decided to make a video about it to see if they could make any money off of it. And guess what... they did. Infact they made a ton of money from it. Congratulations on helping them avoid real work.
@MrAwsome514 No u r wrong ..U know nothing .So u think that the millions of people in the world who believe in conspiracy theory is because of one video ?! The proofs are so compelling that it doesn't require any conspiracy video to prove them .I first had a suspicion on this when i saw some building being controlled demolitions videos
@asad24041992 The conspiracy theory didn't exist before the video I was talking about was made. Those kids where the ones who came up with the conspiracy theory. All other videos came along after theirs.
"The proofs are so compelling that it doesn't require any conspiracy video to prove them."
Aside from the fact that that is the wrong plural for proof... You essentially just said "The proof is so compelling that we don't need to show it to you."
@MrAwsome514 U r horribly wrong again .Ur arguments are based so senseless based on ur assumptions not PROOFS ..Even that Controlled demolition Inc member said that when he didn't believed in the official story for a second ...
Oh whatever now don't say that because i did a grammatical mistake so it makes ur point right ..If u were here just to give solid arguments u shouldn't have put things like the mistakes in my English.U have nothing on ur side
@MrAwsome514 U have NO PROOF at all even the government didn't bothered to investigate 9/11 ..The building Wtc 7 fell exactly like in controlled demolition in almost free fall speed of 7 seconds with majority of the witnesses confirming the blasts denying the official story, The govt. not carrying out any investigations trying its best to hide the facts with almost every expert saying that its an inside job ..cont
@MrAwsome514 Dozens of Documentaries giving proofs which are hundreds of times more compelling that the senseless official story ,Even the best in the business of Controlled demolition denying the official story.Two of the witnesses who denied the official story got killed mysteriously.The frames from the camera recording video of plane hitting the Pentagon were removed because that wasn't a plane.6 of the 18 alleged hijackers are still alive they are manyy more proofs .
@MrAwsome514 /watch?v=0I6yEezSDV8&feature=related >The only cameramen who took some controversial photographs of ground zero got extradited because he denied to give the those images to the government .
i showed u the video what the man from the fire department said and what an officer( Jason bermous) in Wtc 7 said.Now what do u have other than saying that there wasn't enough sound of blasts ?
Try compareing the videos you have to these... Notice anything that consistently happens in these videos but do not happen in yours? It takes many charges in rapid succession to take down a structure properly...
@MrAwsome514 LOLZ R U SANE ? the buildings being demolished is a PROOF ? U seem to have a mental problem i used the right word for ppl like u, SHEEPS..First that is Rdx Explosion Not Nano Thermite second these cameras very near the building while those recorded in the camera were 5 times this distance ..
@asad24041992 By the way did ou ever consider that maybe... just maybe those explosions might have been things other then demolition charges. You know more then just cement and steel fell out of the towers when the planes hit. Some of the burning fuel fell out too. This started several small fires around the base of the towers. Combine that with falling cement and steel striking nearby vehicles filled with gasoline... well you can figure out the rest...
@MrAwsome514 Stop running away from reality ..Ur senseless arguments can only convince u in this world .Everything is very clear if u come out of ur denial mode ..
There couldn't have been any reason for Wtc 7 to collapse other than controlled demolition and this is exactly what the best in the business of controlled demolition said ..
@MrAwsome514 What possibilities ? u can make ur excused for the twin towers which the structural engineers don't agree with but the Wtc 7 there couldn't have been any other possibility ..
Show me some solid possibilities for the Wtc 7 collapse with proof not ur dreamy possibilities that some big block of concrete from twin towers fell on the ground and then rolled towards the wtc 7 to destruct its supporting columns lol
Be sure to watch the part where it shows several LARGE peices of debris striking tower 7. Also check out the clip at 2:50 which shows that tower 7 did not collapse all at once. One of it's 3 main supports on the lower levels gave way after being exposed to fire for about 7 hours and about a third of the bulding actually collapsed 8 seconds before the rest of the building did.
@MrAwsome514 lolz so that was ur proofs which is again based on NIST findings ..Its as lame as it can get ..First if u bothered to watch the videos i sent rather than making ur own dreamy explanations u would have clearly found out that the fire was only in few offices on the upper floors not anywhere near the first few floors if u see some other videos not only almost all the windows are intact the building is shining like new
@MrAwsome514 U r a sheep ..Ur video is hilarious .If u r saying that the experts and what they said have no value and value lies in ur pathetic assumption that there might be other possibility which u couldn't been able to put forward with some solid evidence
@MrAwsome514 The difference is ur arguments are based on senseless assumption for which there is no proof and mine on experts and some undeniable facts and one of those undeniable facts is that investigators where not allowed to examine why Wtc 7 collapsed and that is why no report of that building was issued
@asad24041992 I showed you video of tower 7 collapsing in a fashion that would not hapen in a controlled demolition. I showed toy proof that ALL controlled demolitions are loud enough to be heard for miles. And yet you ignore this... If the WTC was a controlled demolition everyone on manhatten would have heard a series of very loud explosions before the collapse. Also Tower 7 would not have had a third of the building collapse 8 seconds before the rest.
@MrAwsome514 lolz i have shown u video which is showing that Wtc 7 EXACTLY fell like in controlled demolitions .U r indeed a sheep .I told u that there was nano thermite used which doesn't made much sound but as like a sheep u keep repeating the same thing because u don't have any other proof ..
@MrAwsome514 lolz Ur videos are bullshit nothing but ur desperate try to make a point ..if u don't believe what experts say sheep is the word for ..U r a waste of time.keep living in ur dream world .Have a nice day
@asad24041992 I guess I shouldn't have been so surprized by your ignorance... After all you are just an antisemetic racist from what I see on your channel.
@MrAwsome514 what r u ? ..is this another of ur argument to prove that the official story is true ?
I am anti Zionist not an anti Semite ..U should better watch Dr.Dukes videos too i believe in what he says because what is says are undeniable facts ..I am sure there is some problem ur thinking
@asad24041992 The racisim bit was entierly sepreate from the antisemitism one... You have a few more videos linked to you then just the anti semetic ones.
@asad24041992 Again I was not reffering to your anti semetic connections when I called you a racist. I was reffering to other things I found on your channel.
@asad24041992 This is the third time I have tried to explain this to your stupid ass... The antisemetism and the racism where two seperate accusations unrelated to eachother. As in you have two flaws not one...
@MrAwsome514 dumb hypocrite ur brain is unable to understand very simple and clear things ..
STUPID as i said I don't hate jews(Since there a lot of Jews who are against Zionism) its just Zionism i hate and we should ALL hate and FOOL Zionism is not a RACE ..
@MrAwsome514 Making lame arguments like that have no Value because they are not based on proofs and Facts and to make ur argument look more stupid yeah there might be some debris hitting the Wtc 7(Farthest of the wtc buildings) causing some rooms BUT the things is that the other 4 Wtc Building on which the most of the debris fall and those building burned entirely BUT NOT EVEN ONE OF THEM COLLAPSED..
@asad24041992 Oh and ofcourse we can't forget that some of the buildings that where struck by falling debris may have had natural gas lines in them... You really just plain don't think about alternative possibilities do you? You believe you have your answer and simply ignore all other possibilities.
@MrAwsome514 Lolz u should have better watched the videos i sent to u ..Wtc 7 the farthest of all the building and the third highest wtc building got demolished by falling debris but the other 4 wtc buildings which were very close to the twin towers Nothing happened to them ..This can only make sense to u.
u should better listen what the experts say rather than making ur own dreamy 9/11 incident
@asad24041992 The debris did not fall in a uniform pattern. It scattered unevenly. The majority of the debris fell towards tower 7. And the largest of the debris struck tower 7.
@MrAwsome514 lolz go watch the video again ..Only a bit of debris fell in Wtc 7 which was the farthest of them all from twin towers ..No one is gonna agree with ur dreamy 9/11 assumptions ..
@MrAwsome514 .Look at what u r saying Ur whole argument lies on not disproving them or showing some proofs but saying senseless things like that people who made a documentary were rejected from the film school and made tons of money by that ..
• A petition to launch a real, public, subpoena-empowered, criminal investigation of the events of Sept. 11, 2001 is on the White House website. 5,000 signatures needed by 28 October 2011. Please go & sign that petition, & tell all your friends who care about the truth of 9/11. Spread it wide & quick across the Internet. We need a new fully independent commission to investigate this horrified tragedy.
and most importantly the question is...if it was planned, why did they do it? simple: to destroy our freedoms. since 9/11 the patriot act was created. this essentially gives the gov't every right to track, monitor, tap phones, listen in on you, aka complete total loss of privacy. we lost a TON of freedoms from that alone. people dont see the big picture, they just pretend to care for the people who died because you all feel helpless and this is the only way you feel you can contribute to helping
"renovations" were being done weeks prior to the incident, they could easily have been placing highly advanced bombs (like thermite) in the mid sections of the towers to essentially GUT the building, that way when (for w/e reason) the upper part finally gave way and fell, the whole tower crumbled under the weight. if you didnt gut the building, the bottom parts under the crash would have withstood as the top part rained down on the city below. but no...the ENTIRE building crumbled.
they interview demo experts who try to debunk the fact that these buildings were a planned demo, but a) who the fuck are these so called demo experts, i dont know them. b) they only tell you standard procedure of how to destroy a building (if youre planning on making it look like a non demo, you wont use procedure.) c) they not only destroyed the ground level supports, witnesses have stated hearing explosions at ground level, but they also set explosives in the middle of the towers- continues...
these anti-conspiracy assholes always forget that only fucked up ignorant americans actually believe the official 9/11 report. WELL over half of the americans in this country question the report, and know something is fishy here. and WAY higher percentages of people from other countries can easily see this was an incredibly suspicious operation. only these pathetic americans who want to believe they are safe and living in a free world bubbled off from danger accept the official story. pathetic.
@40joel sure. they'll interview one single "expert" on controlled demolitions and have him sit there on national news broadcasts saying how its very possible for the planes and its fire to have brought the entire structure down, even though only the top 1/4 of the structure was falling outwardly away from the building. they'll say the tremendous weight crushed the floors. meanwhile you'll have 200 other demo experts saying its literally impossible, but they wont be on the news.
@penal420 Have you ever seen an actual controlled demolition? I suggest you go watch a video of one start to finish and be sure to have the volume on so you can hear it. I will wait...
Back yet? Did you hear it? All those explosions? Pretty loud wheren't they? Infact you can hear them for several miles in every direction. Demo charges are weak explosives too. Just big enough to destory the supports. So why did the WTC fall so quietly? A quiet controlled demo is impossible.
@crownsedge Do you understand what a sound is? It is a shockwave travelling through the air. You cannot have a silent explosion because an explosion is also a shockwave of expanding gas. Thermite is the only one that makes any sense. However the only evidence for thermite are beams that where cut by the clean up crew who used thermite charges in their clean up work to cut the debris into smaller more managable chunks.
@MrAwsome514 Will you please stop acting so condescending, you don't know all the facts otherwise there would be no conspiracies. If you search up a 9/11 survivor Barry Jennings, he made it very clear he heard multiple explosions when he was escaping.
@crownsedge Yea and last week everyone down at the local taco bell thought they had heard a shooting... It was a truck that backfired. It is very difficult to identify something by it's sound. By the way... If those where explosions from demolition charges (which is what you must be trying to get at) they would not have only been heard by people in or at the base of the towers... Infact anypone that close would have gone deaf from it. Demo charges can be heard for miles.
@MrAwsome514 I suppose it wouldn't have anything to do with the thousands of people screaming and the hundreds of sirens blaring. Again though, stop being a condescending prick.
@crownsedge What you don't understand is that the sound of demolition charges going off would drown out the sounds of the sirens and screaming survivors. Not the other way around.
@crownsedge Any explosive is going to make a lot of noise. I am reffering to all explosive materials. You can not have an explosion that does not generate a massive amount of sound and that has enough energy to be used in a controlled demolition. Any explosive material that is powerful enough to take out a steel support beam is going to be VERY loud. An explosion is a shock wave of expanding gas which allways generates a sound wave the strnegth of which being proportional to that of the blast.
@40joel and really the focus here is building number 7. when you see what the falling towers of 1 and 2 did to the other wtc buildings, they were destroyed beyond belief, YET their steal frame structures were still standing. meanwhile wtc building 7, which took much much less damage from the falls comes crumbling down in a perfectly controlled demolition a good 8 hours after the other towers fell. you are truly in denial to think this shit was all a freak occurrence.
@penal420 If you ask anyone if the govt. lies they will tell you yes, ask them if it's possible they are lying on 9/11 all of a sudden they change their mind. There's plenty of scientific evidence that states the official story is a cover up. The tides are changing though and more and more people are waking up
@40joel No... The simple fact is we know our government is too incompetant to pull something like this off. Also there are not "more and more people are waking up". The simple fact is the only reason more people believe this crap now is because the children who where too young at the time to remember it are now teenagers who have been getting sucked into this little fairy tale.
@penal420 ... Yeah, because everyone knows that celebrities are experts who have studied (metalurgy, physics, weapons, explosives, etc.) for years and years. They obviously know more than all the pesky, inconsequential scientists with PhD's who have decades of experience in their field.
@amazinggarrett1 thats the thing that annoys me the most, there are experts in the field, who devoted their lives to one subject, imagine the passion involved in spending 30 years on one topic and wanting to know everything you can about it and then some username comes at you quoting 'statistics' and saying their sources (who are just other usernames) are irrefutable and that everyone with a PhD is part of the government conspiracy and dont know anything....
@amazinggarrett1 you generalize the term "celebrities" as if they arent individuals with their own minds, some of which are very intelligent and insightful. charlie sheen is a great example of a man who is no idiot. insane is arguable, but hes no idiot. hes not the only celeb that knows this is all a cover up of some kind. even many "experts" agree that something is wrong with this story. so dont say ALL the scientists agree, many engineers think it was a controlled demo as well. get a clue.
@penal420 watch the popular mechanics vs loose change discussion and tell me who the more rational people are the editors and journalists of a very respected scientific journal...or two middle aged men with no presentable certifications and who focus their points on simply calling everyone else a liar
@hyosyd ill tell you who i believe are the rational people: the demolitions experts and ex military members who are specifically trained in taking down "hard targets' that are built with steel reinforced concrete pillars. they know that the only way to bring a structure, like the towers, to the ground completely is to sever the support columns within the structure. just having the top quarter of the building cascading down off the top isnt going to sever those supports that are down below it...
@hyosyd yeah well tell that to the 67% of people who agree with sheen. that puts you in the minority as one of the ignorant fools who would believe bullshit coming from some talking head who works for cnn. its not like sheen is the only celeb to feel this way. they even have rosie odonnel on there sayin it. of course the media only wants to show the people that have already been made out as nut jobs saying it so your average goon like hyosyd just writes it off as another nut job blabbing. genius
@hyosyd the number....is from the fucking video you just watched. did you bother to watch it? were you listening at all? its right around the 3:00 mark. go fucking watch it. im not generalizing the minority, because 9 times out of 10 my opinions are in the minority. my POINT, since you are obviously oblivious by your ignorance to where i got these poll numbers from..... is that if charlie IS insane as you so claim, then 67% of the public must be too. 67% of people think its a cover up. WAKE UP!
What's the entertainment industry saying about it? That's as relevant a question as what the food service industry is saying about it! Fucking clowns. Professionals investigate this stuff... Americans are so fucking stupid, ignorant, and dangerous...
@thepossessor got a quote on that for us? otherwise its just some unknown asshole who calls himself "theprofessor" on some youtube account making a claim w/o backing it up with any...ANY evidence.
@Tamayo1980 sure. and until sufficient evidence is presented to support some kind of "covering up" or "inside work" that you're claiming, i'll reasonably have to accept that there was something going on. but until then, it is what it is and nothing more
@chadwick0091 So you are willing to accept that our military guys are dying for lies and it doesn't bother you? How are you comfortable with believing what the government is telling you when you only get what you need to know and even then, how can you believe the little disinfo they give to you? I think its more patriotic to question the government "story" than to just accept what they tell us. How are you gonna get ur "significant evidence" if they won't even do a real investigation?
@Tamayo1980 first of all, nobody has given a valid argument to support that "our military guys are dying for lies." second, it's not JUST the government's "story," it's the story of every peer reviewed scientific study on the events and the story of all of the families of the people on the planes. third, there's already been an investigation done. the only "sufficient evidence" that needs to be presented is evidence that SUPPORTS these conspiracy claims.
@chadwick0091 WOW i know ur one of those deniers, but either way Y ARE OUR BOYS DIEING IN IRAQ AND Y DID WE GO THERE? is it because of 9-11 and to prevent preemptive war on our country, or is it to stop Saddam for committing genocide with the weapons we sold to him? take ur pick but bet the story will change again, cause i lived it. How many times is the story gonna change as per the reason y we went to iraq cause Saddam had nothing to do with 9-11, not even gonna go into it about Afghanistan
@chadwick0091 Just follow the money trail and you'll find your truth. I used to be a sheeple and a pawn and first started asking questions when i heard back in 2004 that KBR contractors were getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars tax free to drive a truck/bus or sit in a MWR tent to man sign in logs while my fellow marines were getting blown away to protect their convoys an the politicians argue about buying dragon skin armor for all military in the combat zone. where is the 2.3 trillion?
@Tamayo198 i'm a denier? a denier of what? the only doing any denying are the Truthers. we went to Iraq b/c of that fucktard george bush and his administration...thinking there were WMD there, which there turned out not to be any. as for the 2.3 trillion, i have no idea where it went. maybe the terrorists hacked into the accounting mainframes and stole it. who knows? but whoever is making a positive claim needs to provide sufficient evidence to justify it
@chadwick0091 Just remain a sheep bro; ur not worth saving, but maybe if you quit making excuses you will WAKE UP. You claim "nobody has given a valid argument to support that "our military guys are dying for lies." Y are they dieing in Iraq? LIES because the Administration KNEW what kinna weapons the Iraq had cause we (America) sold it to them. Yes terrorist infiltrated the government networks and stole trillions and we are not killing ppl to get its back? yes terrorist withing the gov. system
@Tamayo1980 keep believing your conspiracy theory bullshit bro. making excuses? please. it's a fact that nobody has given a valid argument to support that our military guys are dying for lies. you wanna know why? b/c EVERYBODY WOULD KNOW ABOUT IT. there wouldn't be any discussion over it. you keep making claims about our gov't lying and knowing what weapons are in Iraq, so YOU need to provide indisputable evidence. your claim of terrorists in the gov't, you need sufficient evidence for that too.
@Tamayo1980 My friend, I am not a conspiracy theory kinda guy, but after seeing and reading and listening to various ppl. there is no way those towers came without inside help. That sorta collapse would make a demo export horny for christ sakes. And Americans in general don't want to believe it...I can understand that, but I cant ignore my lying eyes!
@bermudaguy1 The reason y Americans continue to ignore that 9-11 was an inside job is because they would be scared to death that our government can do what they did to fellow Americans. Whats more sad is that 95% of Americans don't truly care about the guys fighting and dieing in these wars but will call themselves "patriotic" its unpatriotic to die and fight for a lie and Americans are no more patriotic that the "patriotic Act" just like the stupid sheeple chadwick0091.
@Tamayo1980 stop making excuses for them (the government) and maybe you really know what happen to the 2.3 trillion if you do your own research and not have me telling you that money was missing 10 years ago. If you had any knowledge of the mission trillions you would already know that Don Rumsfeld tried to blame the missing money on an accounting error, but y ask questions right? when you can make up ur own conclusion, Rumsfeld also plead the 5th when he was put in the hot seat. so tighten up
As an engineer myself, and having spoken with some of the ones who investigated the trade centers and pentagon after 9/11, leads me to believe that it was not an inside job at all. Everyone who says otherwise really needs to do some fact-checking. And the fact that people still believe the ungrounded "evidence" provided by conspiracy theorists is shocking and worrying. Is this how stupid humanity is? Ignoring experts and relying on "intuition"?
Well you must be a failed engineer if you think fire can melt steel beams causing a building to fall into it's own footprint. You must also be ignorant as fuck to ignore the squibs, the molten steal flowing out the side, the sonic booms before collapse, the firemen who heard bombs going off, and the fact Larry S had the building somehow pre-rigged for collapse indicating foreknowledge. You think Bin commanded it all from a cave!? LOL
@Iseeyoursoul I never heard any reports of actual firemen reporting bombs exploding. Have you ever heard a bomb? It just sounds like a big bang. That could be caused by almost ANYTHING in a building collapse. As well, fire can, and has, and will continue to, be a major cause of building collapse around the world. It did melt the steel. Easily.
And nobody "pre-rigged" the building. That's nonsense. Also, planes into anything will damage it nearly to collapse. It's physics. Learn some facts.
@Iseeyoursoul I never heard any reports of actual firemen reporting bombs exploding. Have you ever heard a bomb? It just sounds like a big bang. That could be caused by almost ANYTHING in a building collapse. As well, fire can, and has, and will continue to, be a major cause of building collapse around the world. It did melt the steel. Easily.
And nobody "pre-rigged" the building. That's nonsense. Also, planes into anything will damage it nearly to collapse. It's physics. Learn some facts.
@Iseeyoursoul I never heard any reports of actual firemen reporting bombs exploding. Have you ever heard a bomb? It just sounds like a big bang. That could be caused by almost ANYTHING in a building collapse. As well, fire can, and has, and will continue to, be a major cause of building collapse around the world. It did melt the steel. Easily.
And nobody "pre-rigged" the building. That's nonsense. Also, planes into anything will damage it nearly to collapse. It's physics. Learn some facts.
@Iseeyoursoul Your comment is so ridiculous it doesn't even warrant me getting into detail. Literally every point you made is absolutely bullshit.
I'm at a loss for words. All I can do is marvel at your idiocy and have a quiet chuckle to myself. I think I'll show this to people so they can have a laugh as well.
Nice responce. Avoid all the details. Nice.... that's what most of you are doing.
Don't refer me to some bogus "peer reviewed" paper written by 3-4 guys who reference the failed NIST reports in their sources, and which you probably didn't read yourself.
Tell me in your own words how they rigged that building for collapse *on the fly* during all the commotion of 911. Preparing a building for that would take days!
You can avoid the question and giggle like a bitch, or answer it.
@Iseeyoursoul What was wrong with the NIST reports? I read through them in my classes because - wait for it - my professor was involved with writing them. And he's had 30+ years of engineering experience. Also, I didn't have to read reports, all I had to look at was the type of steel used in the construction, and it made sense.
I'd also like to point out that you can't hide demolition rigging.
Anyways, continue to believe what celebs say and not professionals.
Although we can't fully prove that 911 was TRULY an inside job done by the government, the people who debunk our theory that we're wrong can't prove they're right either. The government refuses or can't answer all the unanswered questions brought up about this. I just can't believe that even after 10 years, MANY Americans still believe in this "official" story. It's just sad. Why aren't these conspiracy theories regarding 9/11 more mainstream?
Charlie Sheen is an insane, ignorant crackhead. So he's a particularly apt addition to the Konspiracy Krowd.
Banging 7 gramme rocks a day....winning!
llanbo 2 days ago
Y do the retarded americans need a celebrity to confirm ths ws an inside job anyway?! Cnt those twat heads do the math themselves?!
sssatinsilver 1 week ago
@VishezzTv -- LuLZ, your comment is CLASSIC self-absorbed delusion that renounces common sense, evidence, verified facts, reason, logic, scientific principles, sworn testimony, historical precedent, research, experiment, verification, rigorous analysis & published accounts that contradict official 911 Theory in favor of faith-based conviction of belief & emotional 'certainty'. Its apparant your 911 knowledge is superficial since even MINIMAL study refutes dozens of core official points.
starmanskye 3 weeks ago
@starmanskye
"Its apparant your 911 knowledge is superficial since even MINIMAL "
Studies by who? Did they have peer review? I doubt it.
There are 100s of trade organizations for the Aviation, Architecture and Civil Engineering community, and out of all those exist, not one, I repeat, NOT ONE has concluded the "official story" doesn't add up, not even organizations from other countries.
It's funny you claim reason, when the experts are not on your side.
Alaskaslim 3 days ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Holy sh... it seems like everyone is an expert in building techniques, metal science and what not all of a sudden... Rosie O starts of with "I beleive"... and "I beleive" and then says "It is IMPOSSIBLE for a building..." talking of miracles, ranting ... i really fear people that listen to that kind of talk. I don't have an opinion... but noone should listen to this kind of rethoric. Pompous a**
ExtrackterYT 1 month ago
Comment removed
ExtrackterYT 1 month ago
Comment removed
ExtrackterYT 1 month ago
if you really believe this you are the reason people think USA is full of idioits
keifer420oz 1 month ago
@keifer420oz -- BuLLSHIT. In fact, YOUR comment reflects the kind of naive dumbed-down gullibility & willful stupidity that people around the world criticize the USA for being full of idiots. WHAT you so hostile to, that ANYONE dare suggest US Government is less than honest when it suits a geopolitical agenda? 911 Commission members THEMSELVES admitted many witnesses including CIA lied. ONLY someone who is either stupid or a gummint shill would say nothing about 'official' 911 theory STINKS.
starmanskye 3 weeks ago
@starmanskye U MAD BRO? HAHAHA
keifer420oz 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@starmanskye
"THEMSELVES admitted many witnesses including CIA lied. "
Yes, they did lie, but you're being dishonest by not saying what they lied about (or do you honestly not know?).
Stop manipulating facts for your own ends.
Alaskaslim 3 days ago
@keifer420oz WELL IF IT WASNT AN INSIDE JOB THEN..........DOESNT THAT MAKE AMERICA STUPID,I MEAN BOX CUTTERS?MILES AND MILES INTO AMERICAN SPACE,WITHOUT ANY1 STOPING THEM.HITTING ALL THESE BIG TARGETS?LOL,IM AFRAID IT MAKES AMERICA LOOK STUPID AND DUMB ANY WAY U LOOK AT IT.
cain534 2 weeks ago
This is why charlie sheens life got fucked up OMG!!
MQMCANSUCKDICK 1 month ago
this was the coolest clip i've seen in awhile. So finally there is more than half the public believe that there is a cover-up? WTF are we all doing at war with the middle east? Shit is really fucked up when we know there is a problem and we continue to sit on our ass and do nothing....as people die, every day because of a falsified story that led the western world to war with the middle east. Just like before, every war before based on lies and deceit.
houstonair 2 months ago
@houstonair "so finally there is more than half the public believe that there is a cover up?" ROFLMAO
JamesIsViolet 2 months ago
@JamesIsViolet -- So do tell, WHY would you be gleefully rolling around on the floor at the fact that more than half the nation sees thru the criminality of the ruling elites who have sold-out to corporations, wrecked the economy, overthrown our civil rights, engaged in ever-more reckless & unjustified military adventures, colluded in monstrous frauds, tells the public most outrageous lies, & have overseen the subversion of democracy with a Fascist Technocracy antithetical to truth & justice?
starmanskye 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is stupid.
ItWasTyped. com to help you separate the nonsense conspiracy theories from the true ones
culturebully3 2 months ago
Dont take charlies word for it, take the word of thousands of experts in every related feild..ae 911 truth, pilots for 911 truth, vets for 911 truth etc etc
FIGHT1FOR2CHANGE3 3 months ago
114 dumb sheeps disliked this video
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 You mean 985 dumb sheep liked this video. The flock does not know who the sheapard is... The REAL truth is the flock is actually lead by con artists who make stories up so they can make personal gain from it. They sell books, give lectures (which have entrance fees ofcourse), and even make appearances (for the right price) at conspiracy theory themed conventions. Look at how much people make by spreading this crap then come back and tell me they aren't just in it for the money.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 No i meant what i said 114 dumb sheeps liked this video.U should better find some answers to how Wtc 7 fell like being imploded in controlled demolition..This is just a senseless argument that the conspiracy theory is wrong just because some ppl are writing books on it ,the FACT is there are some proofs which are way more compelling then the official 9/11 story.
Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.(Adolf Hitler)
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 suggest you go and watch a video of a controlled demolition... Be sure to listen very carefully. Those explosions can be heard for miles and sound like a carpet bombing... If any demolition charges had gone off that day we would have heard them very clearl in every video and ALL of the survivors that where anywhere near the tower would have gone deaf from it.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Unfortunately for u i have seen a lot of controlled demolition videos so i know how much sound the demolition generates.U r horribly wrong denying a clear cut thing that the Wtc building fell exactly like a building in controlled demolitions by a senseless childish argument that it couldn't have been controlled demolition because the sound waves in controlled demolition are very high..U should better watch some controlled demolition videos
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 Oh really? Because last I checked in a controlled demolition the supports on every floor are demolished at once causing the entire building to collapse at the same time. Yet in the WTC collapse the collapse starts at the floors that where hit and then the portion of the building above that falls into the ones below it. The lower floors don't begin to collapse untill the upper ones strike them. A dominoe style collapse does not happen in a controlled demolition.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 I think u r here with something .Ur argument are so senseless that they are making me think about ur mental condition..the Wtc demolished EXACTLY like a Building in controlled demolition ..First There is no steel building in the world which has demolished by small fires like Wtc 7 building has it is IMPOSSIBLE that the building had fallen otherwise than by demolition.I am talking at Wt7 not the twin towers
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 The only thing the collapse of the WTC had in common with a controlled demolition was the direction they fell. In a controlled demolition every floor of the building collapses at once but in the WTC we see a dominoe effect collapse. No evidence of thermite was found at the scene... untill after truthers like you got their hands on pictured of beams the clean up crew where cutting with thermite charges so they could move them. Truthers knowingly misrepresent evidence all the time.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Do u know how many ppl witnessed that there were blasts in the basements of both the building ?? Don't try to mix the case of Wtc 7 with the other two towers cause for them u have the excuse of plane hitting them ..There was termite found there which was still burning after days.How wtc fell to ground by some small fires in offices is a clear cut proof that all three building were imploded ..
watch?v=imMirryq6gQ
asad24041992 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrAwsome514 watch this watch?v=ERhoNYj9_fg
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 Also Unfortunately for you... You have failed to take into considerartion that setting up a controlled demolition in the towers would have taken months, thousands of pounds of explosive materials, and thousands of feet of det chord. You cannot set something like that up in an active office building with out it being blatantly obvious to EVERYONE. You certainly can't have it collapse and have none of those materials show up in the debris either.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 I think u haven't ever seen a controlled demolitions .It NEVER take months for controlled demolition ,common don't try to fool me ..Some weeks before 911 strange things happened in the building teams shutting down the security systems and its on record.Might be they used some other technique of controlled demolition just destroying the support columns.Thermite(used in controlled demolition) was found on the support columns which was still melting the steel
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 To set up normally no it should only take weeks... To set up in an office building that is in active use on the other hand would take considerably longer. Also you have to take into account that two of these towers where amung the tallest in he world. between the planning and the positioning it would have taken at least 1 month if not allmost 2. No evidence of thermite was found. Truthers found pictures of beams cut with thermite by the clean up crew and claimed them to be evidence
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Don't try to fool me ..Go watch some videos to see how much time is needed to get a building down.U r making ur own assumptions.The planning might have took years okay ? so what ?
Its on record that those three buildings had teams there doing things which many of the ppl at twin towers found strage .Thermite was there and if u know what 'shape charges' are u can see that Girders melted by them watch?v=lv2ck2qsiGA
watch?v=9J8ojEWlkrs wake up from ur dream
asad24041992 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 The professionals all around the world who know how these buildings are made don't agree with the official story ..The proof which the conspiracy theorists give are way more compelling then the official story and the senseless claims like i can't be an controlled demolition because it creates so much sound ...Grow up my friend watch this video /watch?v=imMirryq6gQ
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 "The professionals all around the world who know how these buildings are made don't agree with the official story"
I want names. Something that I can use to confirm weather or not these people are actually "Professionals". I happen to have several friends who are in the demolition buisness. All of which agree with the findings of the NIST report, and by the way much of my information comes from what I have learned from those friends.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 What a shame u don't even tried to know what the professionals all around the world say about it, don't try to fool urself ..Oh common the facts are very clear ..here is Dr.Stephen E Jones Phd explaining that the signs of Nano thermite (Which doesn't make much sound) after his analysis of some of the remains
watch?v=MwSc7NPn8Ok
I think u haven't watched the videos i sent ..There is a reply to the Nist report in the video i sent u previously
asad24041992 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Wtc 7 is a key for knowing what happened at 9/11 a 43 story building collapsed exactly like in controlled demolition and what u have in reply is that it can't be just because there wasn't enough decibels of sound ?! i have to be an idiot to believe in what u r saying is an answer to something which is very clear ..U should watch the documentary 'Loose change'
asad24041992 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Dutch controlled demolition expert
/watch?v=l6D4dla17aA
Member of Controlled Demolition Inc ( Worlds leading demolition company) saying that Wtc 7 collapse couldn't have been otherwise by EXPLOSIVES Inside ,watch the full videos
/watch?v=OcwnJTpholc
/watch?v=ns_hjONWZ88
he said symmetrical small blasts were used for the demolition ,u can clearly see them in this video at 0:44
/watch?v=972ETepp4GI&feature=related
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 "he said symmetrical small blasts were used for the demolition ,u can clearly see them in this video at 0:44
/watch?v=972ETepp4GI&feature=related"
Those " Blasts" where windows shattering due to the uneven pressure of the collapse...
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 i will again say don't try to fool urself ..Ur arguments are weak and senseles.. its exactly what happens during a controlled demolition if u have ever seen it ..
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 "don't try to fool urself"
The only one fooling themselves here is you. You have argued that explosives where set off in the basement of the towers and yet there is a major flaw with this theory. If there where explosives going off in the basement of each of the towers then why did the two main towers collapse starting from the top?
Honestly... even if I had the power to send you back in time so you could see it for yourself I still would not be able to convince you.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 u r fooling urself ..I have given u so many proofs .I have not just argued i have given u proofs of what i said ..Ur question showed how much u actually know about controlled demolition ..The explosives are set all around the supporting columns specially in the basement ..U r trying to mix everything, first there are witnesses who said about that blasts in the basement that doesn't mean that there were no blasts anywhere else .....
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 You mean there where witnesses who reported sounds that they described as sounding LIKE explosions. It is very difficult to accurately identify sound.
I have watched the videos you have linked... and gotten quite a few laughs out of them.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 secondly the case of the twin towers is different to Wtc 7 don't try to mix them ..I have shown u what experts are saying on wtc 7 collapse ..
The problem is that u don't have anything as a strong argument so u r saying things like this ..I can say that to for u that if i had the power to send u back in time u still would have convinced ur self with the official story ..
asad24041992 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 watch this /watch?v=iEuJimaumW4&list=WL5DA0924CD432F1D8&index=199
/watch?v=NX_UKdqoa_o&list=WL5DA0924CD432F1D8&index=197
the reality is very much clear u just don't want to admit because the lie is very big
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 All you can do is refference other people's opinions. I don't even think you have an actual opinion of your own. You just let other people do your thinking for you. That is a very foolish thing to do.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 lolz they were experts opinion not my opinion .Things are very much clear but they are hard to accept i know ..All u have in reply to everyone is that there wasn't enough sound i am sure even its sound had made all the people in the city deaf u would have come with any other senseless argument ..
Those blasts were of Nano thermite Not Rdx which that Phd in Physics found in this analysis .
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 What ever kid... just keep eating the shit the conspiracy theorists keep selling you.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Keep dreaming and fooling urself
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 Keep allowing yourself to be fooled by others... And so easily too.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 I am not being fooled by anyone ..Everything is very clear i u want to know the truth
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 You do realize this conspiracy theory only even exists because of 3 kids who got rejected from film school who decided to make a video about it to see if they could make any money off of it. And guess what... they did. Infact they made a ton of money from it. Congratulations on helping them avoid real work.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 No u r wrong ..U know nothing .So u think that the millions of people in the world who believe in conspiracy theory is because of one video ?! The proofs are so compelling that it doesn't require any conspiracy video to prove them .I first had a suspicion on this when i saw some building being controlled demolitions videos
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 The conspiracy theory didn't exist before the video I was talking about was made. Those kids where the ones who came up with the conspiracy theory. All other videos came along after theirs.
"The proofs are so compelling that it doesn't require any conspiracy video to prove them."
Aside from the fact that that is the wrong plural for proof... You essentially just said "The proof is so compelling that we don't need to show it to you."
Tell me something... What proof?
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 U r horribly wrong again .Ur arguments are based so senseless based on ur assumptions not PROOFS ..Even that Controlled demolition Inc member said that when he didn't believed in the official story for a second ...
Oh whatever now don't say that because i did a grammatical mistake so it makes ur point right ..If u were here just to give solid arguments u shouldn't have put things like the mistakes in my English.U have nothing on ur side
asad24041992 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 U have NO PROOF at all even the government didn't bothered to investigate 9/11 ..The building Wtc 7 fell exactly like in controlled demolition in almost free fall speed of 7 seconds with majority of the witnesses confirming the blasts denying the official story, The govt. not carrying out any investigations trying its best to hide the facts with almost every expert saying that its an inside job ..cont
asad24041992 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Dozens of Documentaries giving proofs which are hundreds of times more compelling that the senseless official story ,Even the best in the business of Controlled demolition denying the official story.Two of the witnesses who denied the official story got killed mysteriously.The frames from the camera recording video of plane hitting the Pentagon were removed because that wasn't a plane.6 of the 18 alleged hijackers are still alive they are manyy more proofs .
asad24041992 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 /watch?v=0I6yEezSDV8&feature=related >The only cameramen who took some controversial photographs of ground zero got extradited because he denied to give the those images to the government .
/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU <Witnesses got killed /watch?v=X3uFvOiTNz4&feature=related
i showed u the video what the man from the fire department said and what an officer( Jason bermous) in Wtc 7 said.Now what do u have other than saying that there wasn't enough sound of blasts ?
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992
watch?v=Buseb-Gqyes
watch?v=vQdggP9cvow&feature=related
watch?v=8U4erFzhC-U&feature=related
watch?v=_anYswmGMeM&feature=related
watch?v=VtmwJVmBvXg&feature=related
watch?v=OZkr0A9633Q&feature=related
Try compareing the videos you have to these... Notice anything that consistently happens in these videos but do not happen in yours? It takes many charges in rapid succession to take down a structure properly...
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 LOLZ R U SANE ? the buildings being demolished is a PROOF ? U seem to have a mental problem i used the right word for ppl like u, SHEEPS..First that is Rdx Explosion Not Nano Thermite second these cameras very near the building while those recorded in the camera were 5 times this distance ..
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 By the way did ou ever consider that maybe... just maybe those explosions might have been things other then demolition charges. You know more then just cement and steel fell out of the towers when the planes hit. Some of the burning fuel fell out too. This started several small fires around the base of the towers. Combine that with falling cement and steel striking nearby vehicles filled with gasoline... well you can figure out the rest...
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Stop running away from reality ..Ur senseless arguments can only convince u in this world .Everything is very clear if u come out of ur denial mode ..
There couldn't have been any reason for Wtc 7 to collapse other than controlled demolition and this is exactly what the best in the business of controlled demolition said ..
asad24041992 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 What possibilities ? u can make ur excused for the twin towers which the structural engineers don't agree with but the Wtc 7 there couldn't have been any other possibility ..
Show me some solid possibilities for the Wtc 7 collapse with proof not ur dreamy possibilities that some big block of concrete from twin towers fell on the ground and then rolled towards the wtc 7 to destruct its supporting columns lol
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992
watch?v=_kSq663m0G8
Be sure to watch the part where it shows several LARGE peices of debris striking tower 7. Also check out the clip at 2:50 which shows that tower 7 did not collapse all at once. One of it's 3 main supports on the lower levels gave way after being exposed to fire for about 7 hours and about a third of the bulding actually collapsed 8 seconds before the rest of the building did.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 lolz so that was ur proofs which is again based on NIST findings ..Its as lame as it can get ..First if u bothered to watch the videos i sent rather than making ur own dreamy explanations u would have clearly found out that the fire was only in few offices on the upper floors not anywhere near the first few floors if u see some other videos not only almost all the windows are intact the building is shining like new
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 You are just plain retarded aren't you? I have watched your videos... they where pathetic. Though you clearly did not watch mine...
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 U r a sheep ..Ur video is hilarious .If u r saying that the experts and what they said have no value and value lies in ur pathetic assumption that there might be other possibility which u couldn't been able to put forward with some solid evidence
asad24041992 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrAwsome514 The difference is ur arguments are based on senseless assumption for which there is no proof and mine on experts and some undeniable facts and one of those undeniable facts is that investigators where not allowed to examine why Wtc 7 collapsed and that is why no report of that building was issued
asad24041992 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 /watch?v=pmMokSdRGmw << yet another experts view and explanation about Wtc 7 structural design
/watch?v=mI3wZM47LxU << some more witnesses
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 I showed you video of tower 7 collapsing in a fashion that would not hapen in a controlled demolition. I showed toy proof that ALL controlled demolitions are loud enough to be heard for miles. And yet you ignore this... If the WTC was a controlled demolition everyone on manhatten would have heard a series of very loud explosions before the collapse. Also Tower 7 would not have had a third of the building collapse 8 seconds before the rest.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 lolz i have shown u video which is showing that Wtc 7 EXACTLY fell like in controlled demolitions .U r indeed a sheep .I told u that there was nano thermite used which doesn't made much sound but as like a sheep u keep repeating the same thing because u don't have any other proof ..
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 If you cannot accept the videos I have showen you as proof then you are either stupid or delusional. Probably both...
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 lolz Ur videos are bullshit nothing but ur desperate try to make a point ..if u don't believe what experts say sheep is the word for ..U r a waste of time.keep living in ur dream world .Have a nice day
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 I guess I shouldn't have been so surprized by your ignorance... After all you are just an antisemetic racist from what I see on your channel.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 what r u ? ..is this another of ur argument to prove that the official story is true ?
I am anti Zionist not an anti Semite ..U should better watch Dr.Dukes videos too i believe in what he says because what is says are undeniable facts ..I am sure there is some problem ur thinking
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 I notice you didn't try to deny the accusation of being racist.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 lolz u seriously have a problem in ur brain ..Go read my comment again .
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 You don't deny racisim in that comment. You deny the anti semetism. There is a difference.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 lolz do u think Zionism is a race ? i pity ur knowledge and thinking ..
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 The racisim bit was entierly sepreate from the antisemitism one... You have a few more videos linked to you then just the anti semetic ones.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 U r a Pathetic ignorant ..Go search Zionism on Wikipedia.
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 Again I was not reffering to your anti semetic connections when I called you a racist. I was reffering to other things I found on your channel.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 i will again say that u r a sheep .I don't have an anti semetic connections ..U should first learn what a race is and what is Zionism
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 This is the third time I have tried to explain this to your stupid ass... The antisemetism and the racism where two seperate accusations unrelated to eachother. As in you have two flaws not one...
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 dumb hypocrite ur brain is unable to understand very simple and clear things ..
STUPID as i said I don't hate jews(Since there a lot of Jews who are against Zionism) its just Zionism i hate and we should ALL hate and FOOL Zionism is not a RACE ..
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 You are beyond retarded, you're calling people sheep yet you fully believe in Zionism.
crownsedge 3 months ago in playlist crownsedge's favorites
@crownsedge Zionism is a reality stupid ..I don't believe in Zionism i am against Zionism and everyone should be
asad24041992 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Making lame arguments like that have no Value because they are not based on proofs and Facts and to make ur argument look more stupid yeah there might be some debris hitting the Wtc 7(Farthest of the wtc buildings) causing some rooms BUT the things is that the other 4 Wtc Building on which the most of the debris fall and those building burned entirely BUT NOT EVEN ONE OF THEM COLLAPSED..
asad24041992 3 months ago
Comment removed
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 Oh and ofcourse we can't forget that some of the buildings that where struck by falling debris may have had natural gas lines in them... You really just plain don't think about alternative possibilities do you? You believe you have your answer and simply ignore all other possibilities.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Lolz u should have better watched the videos i sent to u ..Wtc 7 the farthest of all the building and the third highest wtc building got demolished by falling debris but the other 4 wtc buildings which were very close to the twin towers Nothing happened to them ..This can only make sense to u.
u should better listen what the experts say rather than making ur own dreamy 9/11 incident
asad24041992 3 months ago
@asad24041992 The debris did not fall in a uniform pattern. It scattered unevenly. The majority of the debris fell towards tower 7. And the largest of the debris struck tower 7.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 lolz go watch the video again ..Only a bit of debris fell in Wtc 7 which was the farthest of them all from twin towers ..No one is gonna agree with ur dreamy 9/11 assumptions ..
asad24041992 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 .Look at what u r saying Ur whole argument lies on not disproving them or showing some proofs but saying senseless things like that people who made a documentary were rejected from the film school and made tons of money by that ..
asad24041992 3 months ago
• A petition to launch a real, public, subpoena-empowered, criminal investigation of the events of Sept. 11, 2001 is on the White House website. 5,000 signatures needed by 28 October 2011. Please go & sign that petition, & tell all your friends who care about the truth of 9/11. Spread it wide & quick across the Internet. We need a new fully independent commission to investigate this horrified tragedy.
plau0088 3 months ago
monitered and controlled
bkfilipi 3 months ago
When Charlie Sheen is on your side... it is time to take a second look at just what your side is because you might just be on the wrong one.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
oh hell yes we should listen to the "entertainment" business? actors...who are acting/ fake ar enow the experts?
9/10 no one knew shit!
9/12 every liberal was an expert on planes , jets, terroist, jihad, islam,physics, mamath, US military response, GBush 's mind, ect.
IDIOTS...
bluegrassreb1 3 months ago
and most importantly the question is...if it was planned, why did they do it? simple: to destroy our freedoms. since 9/11 the patriot act was created. this essentially gives the gov't every right to track, monitor, tap phones, listen in on you, aka complete total loss of privacy. we lost a TON of freedoms from that alone. people dont see the big picture, they just pretend to care for the people who died because you all feel helpless and this is the only way you feel you can contribute to helping
penal420 3 months ago
"renovations" were being done weeks prior to the incident, they could easily have been placing highly advanced bombs (like thermite) in the mid sections of the towers to essentially GUT the building, that way when (for w/e reason) the upper part finally gave way and fell, the whole tower crumbled under the weight. if you didnt gut the building, the bottom parts under the crash would have withstood as the top part rained down on the city below. but no...the ENTIRE building crumbled.
penal420 3 months ago
they interview demo experts who try to debunk the fact that these buildings were a planned demo, but a) who the fuck are these so called demo experts, i dont know them. b) they only tell you standard procedure of how to destroy a building (if youre planning on making it look like a non demo, you wont use procedure.) c) they not only destroyed the ground level supports, witnesses have stated hearing explosions at ground level, but they also set explosives in the middle of the towers- continues...
penal420 3 months ago
@Adamaintevenmad got some proof? otherwise you are just making an opinion. and we all know what opinions are like.
penal420 3 months ago
these anti-conspiracy assholes always forget that only fucked up ignorant americans actually believe the official 9/11 report. WELL over half of the americans in this country question the report, and know something is fishy here. and WAY higher percentages of people from other countries can easily see this was an incredibly suspicious operation. only these pathetic americans who want to believe they are safe and living in a free world bubbled off from danger accept the official story. pathetic.
penal420 3 months ago
@penal420 Yeah in Europe most people think the govt. is lying. But in America it's a "conspiracy"
40joel 3 months ago
@40joel sure. they'll interview one single "expert" on controlled demolitions and have him sit there on national news broadcasts saying how its very possible for the planes and its fire to have brought the entire structure down, even though only the top 1/4 of the structure was falling outwardly away from the building. they'll say the tremendous weight crushed the floors. meanwhile you'll have 200 other demo experts saying its literally impossible, but they wont be on the news.
penal420 3 months ago
@penal420 Have you ever seen an actual controlled demolition? I suggest you go watch a video of one start to finish and be sure to have the volume on so you can hear it. I will wait...
Back yet? Did you hear it? All those explosions? Pretty loud wheren't they? Infact you can hear them for several miles in every direction. Demo charges are weak explosives too. Just big enough to destory the supports. So why did the WTC fall so quietly? A quiet controlled demo is impossible.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Maybe they didn't use dynamite. Maybe it was semtex, c4 of thermite.
crownsedge 3 months ago in playlist crownsedge's favorites
@crownsedge Do you understand what a sound is? It is a shockwave travelling through the air. You cannot have a silent explosion because an explosion is also a shockwave of expanding gas. Thermite is the only one that makes any sense. However the only evidence for thermite are beams that where cut by the clean up crew who used thermite charges in their clean up work to cut the debris into smaller more managable chunks.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 Will you please stop acting so condescending, you don't know all the facts otherwise there would be no conspiracies. If you search up a 9/11 survivor Barry Jennings, he made it very clear he heard multiple explosions when he was escaping.
crownsedge 3 months ago
@crownsedge Yea and last week everyone down at the local taco bell thought they had heard a shooting... It was a truck that backfired. It is very difficult to identify something by it's sound. By the way... If those where explosions from demolition charges (which is what you must be trying to get at) they would not have only been heard by people in or at the base of the towers... Infact anypone that close would have gone deaf from it. Demo charges can be heard for miles.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 I suppose it wouldn't have anything to do with the thousands of people screaming and the hundreds of sirens blaring. Again though, stop being a condescending prick.
crownsedge 3 months ago
@crownsedge What you don't understand is that the sound of demolition charges going off would drown out the sounds of the sirens and screaming survivors. Not the other way around.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 What you're talking about is dynamite, C4 and Semtex are quiet by explosives standards.
crownsedge 3 months ago
@crownsedge Any explosive is going to make a lot of noise. I am reffering to all explosive materials. You can not have an explosion that does not generate a massive amount of sound and that has enough energy to be used in a controlled demolition. Any explosive material that is powerful enough to take out a steel support beam is going to be VERY loud. An explosion is a shock wave of expanding gas which allways generates a sound wave the strnegth of which being proportional to that of the blast.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@40joel and really the focus here is building number 7. when you see what the falling towers of 1 and 2 did to the other wtc buildings, they were destroyed beyond belief, YET their steal frame structures were still standing. meanwhile wtc building 7, which took much much less damage from the falls comes crumbling down in a perfectly controlled demolition a good 8 hours after the other towers fell. you are truly in denial to think this shit was all a freak occurrence.
penal420 3 months ago
@penal420 If you ask anyone if the govt. lies they will tell you yes, ask them if it's possible they are lying on 9/11 all of a sudden they change their mind. There's plenty of scientific evidence that states the official story is a cover up. The tides are changing though and more and more people are waking up
40joel 3 months ago
@40joel I hate that phrase..
Motive11331 3 months ago
@40joel No... The simple fact is we know our government is too incompetant to pull something like this off. Also there are not "more and more people are waking up". The simple fact is the only reason more people believe this crap now is because the children who where too young at the time to remember it are now teenagers who have been getting sucked into this little fairy tale.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 keen observation.....
40joel 3 months ago
@penal420 ... Yeah, because everyone knows that celebrities are experts who have studied (metalurgy, physics, weapons, explosives, etc.) for years and years. They obviously know more than all the pesky, inconsequential scientists with PhD's who have decades of experience in their field.
D'oh.
amazinggarrett1 3 months ago
@amazinggarrett1 thats the thing that annoys me the most, there are experts in the field, who devoted their lives to one subject, imagine the passion involved in spending 30 years on one topic and wanting to know everything you can about it and then some username comes at you quoting 'statistics' and saying their sources (who are just other usernames) are irrefutable and that everyone with a PhD is part of the government conspiracy and dont know anything....
hyosyd 3 months ago
@amazinggarrett1 you generalize the term "celebrities" as if they arent individuals with their own minds, some of which are very intelligent and insightful. charlie sheen is a great example of a man who is no idiot. insane is arguable, but hes no idiot. hes not the only celeb that knows this is all a cover up of some kind. even many "experts" agree that something is wrong with this story. so dont say ALL the scientists agree, many engineers think it was a controlled demo as well. get a clue.
penal420 3 months ago
@penal420 watch the popular mechanics vs loose change discussion and tell me who the more rational people are the editors and journalists of a very respected scientific journal...or two middle aged men with no presentable certifications and who focus their points on simply calling everyone else a liar
hyosyd 3 months ago
@hyosyd ill tell you who i believe are the rational people: the demolitions experts and ex military members who are specifically trained in taking down "hard targets' that are built with steel reinforced concrete pillars. they know that the only way to bring a structure, like the towers, to the ground completely is to sever the support columns within the structure. just having the top quarter of the building cascading down off the top isnt going to sever those supports that are down below it...
penal420 3 months ago
"Do not ascribe to conspiracy that which stupidity will suffice."
KeahuBooth 3 months ago
those who dont believe of the conspiracy theories of 9/11, just look up Building 7. just do it.
silverhawkroman 3 months ago
charlie sheen: "i said call me insane, but did it look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition?"
charlie sheen, you are insane
hyosyd 3 months ago
@hyosyd yeah well tell that to the 67% of people who agree with sheen. that puts you in the minority as one of the ignorant fools who would believe bullshit coming from some talking head who works for cnn. its not like sheen is the only celeb to feel this way. they even have rosie odonnel on there sayin it. of course the media only wants to show the people that have already been made out as nut jobs saying it so your average goon like hyosyd just writes it off as another nut job blabbing. genius
penal420 3 months ago
@penal420 who is 67%? where is that number from? and are you just generalising the minority as ignorant fools?
hyosyd 3 months ago
@hyosyd the number....is from the fucking video you just watched. did you bother to watch it? were you listening at all? its right around the 3:00 mark. go fucking watch it. im not generalizing the minority, because 9 times out of 10 my opinions are in the minority. my POINT, since you are obviously oblivious by your ignorance to where i got these poll numbers from..... is that if charlie IS insane as you so claim, then 67% of the public must be too. 67% of people think its a cover up. WAKE UP!
penal420 3 months ago
@penal420 haha ok first of all, calm down, secondly, charlie sheen is not crazy? ok: watch?v=h5aSa4tmVNM
hyosyd 3 months ago
The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist. And like that, poof. He's gone.
JoeFabooche 3 months ago
What's the entertainment industry saying about it? That's as relevant a question as what the food service industry is saying about it! Fucking clowns. Professionals investigate this stuff... Americans are so fucking stupid, ignorant, and dangerous...
punctualbird 4 months ago
@Adamaintevenmad I can see you have an amazing grasp of the English language but try not to be so truculent. Let it go whatever it is.
good2btheking 4 months ago
sheen is controlled opposition, he cleverly admitted that he was in the illuminati during that famous televised interview
thepossessor 4 months ago
@thepossessor got a quote on that for us? otherwise its just some unknown asshole who calls himself "theprofessor" on some youtube account making a claim w/o backing it up with any...ANY evidence.
penal420 3 months ago
@Adamaintevenmad Apparently you dont have a mirror. Invest in one asshole.
good2btheking 4 months ago
Awesome interviews, go Hollywood! Wish it was always this smart!
pakhazman 4 months ago
Comment removed
pakhazman 4 months ago
Speak the truth, shame the Devil.
good2btheking 4 months ago
Remember remember the eleventh of September
THERMITE! A plane it t'was not!
I see no reason why the murder of freedom
Should ever be forgot
CatOuttaBag 4 months ago
fuckin 9/11 Truthers. do these ignorant fools ever go away???
Building 7 Explained: /watch?v=uFJa9WUy5QI
"Loose Change" getting owned (5 part video): /watch?v=stVmEmJ666M
No conspiracy. No inside job. Your welcome
chadwick0091 4 months ago
@chadwick0091 jet fuel thats 4/5 kerosine can bring down 3 steel towers is a joke.
domamania 4 months ago
@domamania apparently not since it happened...
chadwick0091 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chadwick0091 what are you trying to say ?
domamania 4 months ago
@chadwick0091 and bet you also accept the answer about the 2.3 trillion missing from the pentagon announced by Donald Rumsfeld 1 day before 9-11.
Tamayo1980 4 months ago
@Tamayo1980 sure. and until sufficient evidence is presented to support some kind of "covering up" or "inside work" that you're claiming, i'll reasonably have to accept that there was something going on. but until then, it is what it is and nothing more
chadwick0091 4 months ago
@chadwick0091 So you are willing to accept that our military guys are dying for lies and it doesn't bother you? How are you comfortable with believing what the government is telling you when you only get what you need to know and even then, how can you believe the little disinfo they give to you? I think its more patriotic to question the government "story" than to just accept what they tell us. How are you gonna get ur "significant evidence" if they won't even do a real investigation?
Tamayo1980 4 months ago
@Tamayo1980 first of all, nobody has given a valid argument to support that "our military guys are dying for lies." second, it's not JUST the government's "story," it's the story of every peer reviewed scientific study on the events and the story of all of the families of the people on the planes. third, there's already been an investigation done. the only "sufficient evidence" that needs to be presented is evidence that SUPPORTS these conspiracy claims.
chadwick0091 4 months ago
@chadwick0091 WOW i know ur one of those deniers, but either way Y ARE OUR BOYS DIEING IN IRAQ AND Y DID WE GO THERE? is it because of 9-11 and to prevent preemptive war on our country, or is it to stop Saddam for committing genocide with the weapons we sold to him? take ur pick but bet the story will change again, cause i lived it. How many times is the story gonna change as per the reason y we went to iraq cause Saddam had nothing to do with 9-11, not even gonna go into it about Afghanistan
Tamayo1980 4 months ago
@chadwick0091 Just follow the money trail and you'll find your truth. I used to be a sheeple and a pawn and first started asking questions when i heard back in 2004 that KBR contractors were getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars tax free to drive a truck/bus or sit in a MWR tent to man sign in logs while my fellow marines were getting blown away to protect their convoys an the politicians argue about buying dragon skin armor for all military in the combat zone. where is the 2.3 trillion?
Tamayo1980 4 months ago
@Tamayo198 i'm a denier? a denier of what? the only doing any denying are the Truthers. we went to Iraq b/c of that fucktard george bush and his administration...thinking there were WMD there, which there turned out not to be any. as for the 2.3 trillion, i have no idea where it went. maybe the terrorists hacked into the accounting mainframes and stole it. who knows? but whoever is making a positive claim needs to provide sufficient evidence to justify it
chadwick0091 4 months ago
@chadwick0091 Just remain a sheep bro; ur not worth saving, but maybe if you quit making excuses you will WAKE UP. You claim "nobody has given a valid argument to support that "our military guys are dying for lies." Y are they dieing in Iraq? LIES because the Administration KNEW what kinna weapons the Iraq had cause we (America) sold it to them. Yes terrorist infiltrated the government networks and stole trillions and we are not killing ppl to get its back? yes terrorist withing the gov. system
Tamayo1980 4 months ago
@Tamayo1980 keep believing your conspiracy theory bullshit bro. making excuses? please. it's a fact that nobody has given a valid argument to support that our military guys are dying for lies. you wanna know why? b/c EVERYBODY WOULD KNOW ABOUT IT. there wouldn't be any discussion over it. you keep making claims about our gov't lying and knowing what weapons are in Iraq, so YOU need to provide indisputable evidence. your claim of terrorists in the gov't, you need sufficient evidence for that too.
chadwick0091 4 months ago
@chadwick0091 whatever man guess the proof is good when its coming from the government. good luck with that.
Tamayo1980 4 months ago
@Tamayo1980 My friend, I am not a conspiracy theory kinda guy, but after seeing and reading and listening to various ppl. there is no way those towers came without inside help. That sorta collapse would make a demo export horny for christ sakes. And Americans in general don't want to believe it...I can understand that, but I cant ignore my lying eyes!
bermudaguy1 4 months ago
@bermudaguy1 The reason y Americans continue to ignore that 9-11 was an inside job is because they would be scared to death that our government can do what they did to fellow Americans. Whats more sad is that 95% of Americans don't truly care about the guys fighting and dieing in these wars but will call themselves "patriotic" its unpatriotic to die and fight for a lie and Americans are no more patriotic that the "patriotic Act" just like the stupid sheeple chadwick0091.
Tamayo1980 4 months ago
@Tamayo1980 stop making excuses for them (the government) and maybe you really know what happen to the 2.3 trillion if you do your own research and not have me telling you that money was missing 10 years ago. If you had any knowledge of the mission trillions you would already know that Don Rumsfeld tried to blame the missing money on an accounting error, but y ask questions right? when you can make up ur own conclusion, Rumsfeld also plead the 5th when he was put in the hot seat. so tighten up
Tamayo1980 4 months ago
inside job FULL STOP.
supastauk 4 months ago
umm yeah.....rosie O'donell, seth green, a blink 182 nobody and charlie sheen...keep the grade a pedigrees coming. lmfao
zillatattoo 4 months ago
As an engineer myself, and having spoken with some of the ones who investigated the trade centers and pentagon after 9/11, leads me to believe that it was not an inside job at all. Everyone who says otherwise really needs to do some fact-checking. And the fact that people still believe the ungrounded "evidence" provided by conspiracy theorists is shocking and worrying. Is this how stupid humanity is? Ignoring experts and relying on "intuition"?
matics19 4 months ago
@matics19
Well you must be a failed engineer if you think fire can melt steel beams causing a building to fall into it's own footprint. You must also be ignorant as fuck to ignore the squibs, the molten steal flowing out the side, the sonic booms before collapse, the firemen who heard bombs going off, and the fact Larry S had the building somehow pre-rigged for collapse indicating foreknowledge. You think Bin commanded it all from a cave!? LOL
Engineer? MY ASS.
Iseeyoursoul 4 months ago
@Iseeyoursoul I never heard any reports of actual firemen reporting bombs exploding. Have you ever heard a bomb? It just sounds like a big bang. That could be caused by almost ANYTHING in a building collapse. As well, fire can, and has, and will continue to, be a major cause of building collapse around the world. It did melt the steel. Easily.
And nobody "pre-rigged" the building. That's nonsense. Also, planes into anything will damage it nearly to collapse. It's physics. Learn some facts.
matics19 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Iseeyoursoul I never heard any reports of actual firemen reporting bombs exploding. Have you ever heard a bomb? It just sounds like a big bang. That could be caused by almost ANYTHING in a building collapse. As well, fire can, and has, and will continue to, be a major cause of building collapse around the world. It did melt the steel. Easily.
And nobody "pre-rigged" the building. That's nonsense. Also, planes into anything will damage it nearly to collapse. It's physics. Learn some facts.
matics19 4 months ago
@Iseeyoursoul I never heard any reports of actual firemen reporting bombs exploding. Have you ever heard a bomb? It just sounds like a big bang. That could be caused by almost ANYTHING in a building collapse. As well, fire can, and has, and will continue to, be a major cause of building collapse around the world. It did melt the steel. Easily.
And nobody "pre-rigged" the building. That's nonsense. Also, planes into anything will damage it nearly to collapse. It's physics. Learn some facts.
matics19 4 months ago
@Iseeyoursoul Your comment is so ridiculous it doesn't even warrant me getting into detail. Literally every point you made is absolutely bullshit.
I'm at a loss for words. All I can do is marvel at your idiocy and have a quiet chuckle to myself. I think I'll show this to people so they can have a laugh as well.
matics19 4 months ago
@matics19
Nice responce. Avoid all the details. Nice.... that's what most of you are doing.
Don't refer me to some bogus "peer reviewed" paper written by 3-4 guys who reference the failed NIST reports in their sources, and which you probably didn't read yourself.
Tell me in your own words how they rigged that building for collapse *on the fly* during all the commotion of 911. Preparing a building for that would take days!
You can avoid the question and giggle like a bitch, or answer it.
Iseeyoursoul 4 months ago
@Iseeyoursoul What was wrong with the NIST reports? I read through them in my classes because - wait for it - my professor was involved with writing them. And he's had 30+ years of engineering experience. Also, I didn't have to read reports, all I had to look at was the type of steel used in the construction, and it made sense.
I'd also like to point out that you can't hide demolition rigging.
Anyways, continue to believe what celebs say and not professionals.
Thanks for the laughs, though.
matics19 4 months ago
Although we can't fully prove that 911 was TRULY an inside job done by the government, the people who debunk our theory that we're wrong can't prove they're right either. The government refuses or can't answer all the unanswered questions brought up about this. I just can't believe that even after 10 years, MANY Americans still believe in this "official" story. It's just sad. Why aren't these conspiracy theories regarding 9/11 more mainstream?
swtxwishes