John Gibson agrees on New 9-11 w Bykofsky

[Jazon999]

john gibson keeps trying to get that guy to say we need another 9/11. hes touching himself under the table...

[undajun2]

Maybe its true. If people like these two "Americans" and other diabolical sociopaths who covet war as a fast track to success were under attack, it would probably result in a lot more "unification" then anything they would ever desire for the American people.

[3018mercintell]

Fuck these bitches. Put them up against a wall and shoot'em. same goes for westboro baptist church, burn the mother fucker to the ground.

[grumpytosnowwhite]

The aftermath of 911, in the unity of America, was beautiful. In all other respects, it was a horrible, hellish tragedy. We don't "need" another 911, what we need is to be able to remember the way we felt after 911, and strive to feel that way whenever we become bitter and divided over petty issues. Americans DO have memories, you know.

[botchalism]

Umm, I never want to feel the way I did after 9/11 nor do I want to know what feelings a sick asshole like yourself felt afterwards. Yeah that's what we NEED, like the economy wasn't bad enough we NEED another global catastrophe, take your meds.

[grumpytosnowwhite]

I beg your pardon? I just said that it was a horrible, hellish tragedy. I think that Gibson is a horrible, disgusting sick fucker for thinking we need another 9/11. So basically, you agree completely with me and still are bashing me because you need to bash someone and are disappointed to see that everyone here is sane, so you take it out anyway on someone who isn't a sick fuck. YOU take your meds.

[dilbertgeg]

Grumpy,

The "remember 9-11" fetish means "remain transfixed in a state of rage and fear". Straussians say to control people use religion and patriotism, andor fear.

My real point is a large group of people in interconnected PR think tanks also stated that we NEEDED to be attacked, that a bloodbath in America was VITAL and would be a BLESSING, but they wrote that ONE TO TWO YEARS BEFORE 9-11.

None have been investigated.

Some were *advisors* to Pentagon and Bush, seen on Fox and CNN.

[grumpytosnowwhite]

Of course that's what it means--I know that. That's exactly what Gibsons think we need to do, so that we will go ripping up the world in a muderous, fanatical rage. He also thinks that another 9/11 will be the perfect way to accomplish this mindstate.

When I said "remember 9/11" I meant remember the people who died, and remember how, right after it (before Bush's crap) we came together to help each other, all differences gone. THAT's what we should remember--not vicious patriotic fervor.

[dilbertgeg]

Grumpy,

Hurray for you. I'm not being sarcastic.

Since I don't have Ledeen on vid calling for a 'lucky and providential new Pearl Harbor' or Perle calling for 'a catastrophic and catalyzing event like Pearl Harbor' or a vid of Brzezinski saying democratic societies like ours oppose imperial war EXCEPT with a massive threat like Pearl Harbor -- ALL IN WRITING b4 9-11 -- this is my spotlight on those who had the INTENT and MEANS to make 9-11 an inside job, not Al-CIAda. see my homepage

[dilbertgeg]

Hi Botchalism,

I posted that vid where Grumpy replied to you in a nasty tone.

My real point, see my comments, is that several Americans -- a large group of several interconnected PR think tanks -- also stated that we NEEDED to be attacked, that a bloodbath in America was VITAL and would be a BLESSING, but they wrote that ONE TO TWO YEARS BEFORE 9-11.

Yet none of them have been investigated.

Not only that, they are *advisors* to the Pentagon and to Bush, feat on Fox and on CNN.

[DoNotBeFooled]

Neither one says we NEED another 9/11. They both say we NEED to come together like we did after 9/11. Stop being so eager to bash Fox News! It makes your arguments less credible.

[dilbertgeg]

In another Gibson clip, he says "we NEED another 9/11!" Eager to bash Fox? Maybe we all agree, another 9/11 would be GREAT!!

My other point was to highlight other people who said in BLACK AND WHITE (not on TV) before 9/11 that America needs such an attack as a new Pearl Harbor. That it would be LUCKY if America was hit like P.H.

Who said that? Top Pentagon planners on the Defense Policy Board (and on PNAC) and top National Anti-Terror advisor, Michael Ledeen, Richard Perle, etc.

[DavidZimbeck]

These guys are evil their words are like poison. They are garbage. we need peace not war.

[kermitcintronsucks]

This guy gibson is a theater major. That says it all.

[dilbertgeg]

Kermit,

I think there are plenty of theater majors who DO NOT want the US attacked. Some probably from NYC.

My REAL POINT was to highlight these Fox News comments about a *NEW* Sept 11 are only echoes of earlier statements years BEFORE Sept 11 that USA NEEDED attack to begin multiple wars for US hegemony. Americans (they said) were reluctant to support.

Who said this?

Mostly Neo-cons from think tanks like AEI and PNAC, authors of Iraq War + Surge, so-called counter-terr "experts" like Ledeen.

[kermitcintronsucks]

My point was he has experience in acting. Playing a part Etc. This chicken-hawk is playing a part because they pay him well. He loves sucking Rupert Murdoch's dick.

[rjflan]

This is extremely disturbing considering Rumsfeld proposed another Pearl Habour to unite America and position it as the number one global power for decades to come, and proposed an attack on the WTC one year before 9/11 ever happened.

And Fox news actually seems to like the idea! Jeeeez, this is unreal.

[jastheswift2]

psyops at work, with fox leading the way. this time when there is an attack americans will be ready.