Iran is not the one isolated, It is the America due to thier warmongering and neocon policies. Iran is in stronger position now then ever and will be in better position to defend it's self now. US on the other hand has lost its war with Iraqi and The Afghans.
The Annapolis PEACE TALKS will have an opposite effect on PEACE, and bring the world to the edge of it's own existence. But through this time of trails and tribulations a FALSE PEACE will be achieved, only later to bring on the FINAL BATTLE ON EARTH. All nations of the world will march on JERUSALEM and so too will the KING OF HEAVEN with HIS legion of angels. Who do you think will WIN
religous fundamentalism will not help or aide the process of trying to bring people together on common principle and is irresponsible. Preaching that Peace is evil is certainly a fundamentalist and extremist perspective and non-productive.
Iran feeling isolated? With China (the new world power) I don't think. Also, the Palestinian people are being misrepresented. Bush is only trying to make up for his mess ups, but doing a poor job. The publicity for this was kinda shotty in making him look good. Everyone knows he's just spinning his wheels. The only reason you think Iran is bad is because the U.S. has a problem with Shiate Muslims.
Annapolis is a joke. They invited Israelis and US-puppet un-elected palestinian not the Palestinian-elected Hamas. The left the 2 governments who actually care about Palestinians out. By the way Iran's missils are for DEFENSE. Has Iran ever used any to attack anyone?? NO. So please stop watching Fox News lies.
Not all Irans missles are for defense! Iran does send missles and weapons into Iraq to use against US Military. Fact,not Fox! It is in Iran's interest to do so however creates tensions with US.
Exactly! Assuming that Iran is actually sending missils to Iraq, that is 100% supporting the efforts to "Defend" Iraq against the foreign occupiers.Please do not forget that US has attacked Iraq without any threat from Iraq, it has killed 600,000+ Iraqis 90% of whom were civilian militia and it has no business being there, but to send Iraqi oil out and use Iraqis as moving targets.Iran has no interest in tension but Bush does, to continue the occupation.
I doubt USA could afford a war with Iran. Buch is bankrupting this country by staying in Iraq. When will Iraqis assume responsability for themselves and band together to secure thier borders/protect thier new freedoms/and gov. so USA can finally get out? Obama for change in 2008!
Securing Iraq is only Bush'es excuse for being there. Iraqis have been securing themselves 3000 years before United States was created and they will form a government that is based on majority opinion, in today's case probably Shia, pro-Iran government.
Removing Saddam was the reason for being there(wmd's and chemical weaponry aside)You must remember him. He attacked Kuwait after his failed attack against Iran.I wonder if USA let him keep Kuwait he would later be able to afford a more sucessful campiagn against Iran but Kuwaitis cried for help and coalition forces responded.
Actually he attacked Iran with US weapons,US radar support,& with US permission through Rumsfeld & he attacked Kuwait also with US OK after his meeting (again) with Rumsfeld.Plan was to let him attack Kuwait then because of that bomb the hell out of him which Bush father did.Reason to attack Iraq was oil & giving contracts to US corporations.If US cared about dictators it would never support building them in the first place(Parviz Mosharraf, Saudi king, Saddam, Taliban).
right you are. US supported Hussien but he used that support to overthrow Iraq parliment.Strange how US has a history of supporting those who would turn against it later. The attack on Kuwait was solely Saddams Idea, Not the US. We had better things to do than go half way around the globe to liberate Kuwait.Iraq was Bush jr.'s baby and he and his pals getting rich off this war has many an american pissed off!
But here is the trick. US didn't go halfway around the world to liberate anyone.The Iraq takeover is an old plan. Kuwait was an excuse to bomb Iraqi military and get Iraq ready for the next stage of war which Bush son started in 2001.And since Bush son needed a second excuse to get US public support for war 9/11 happened.And Bush, instead of concentrating on Osama and southern afghanistan, rightaway moved to Iraq where the oil was.
Iran let the Iraqi people alone. Iran supports the failure of the new Iraqi elected gov. by arming insurgents so they can benefit from yes, a pro Iran gov. but is also guilty for the many deaths resulting from thier actions. If US pulls out Iran would be swift to take advantage.
1. Iran should have left the Iraqi people alone after their country attacked Iran and caused half million death and $100bil destruction but Iran still tried to help. It was US who told Iran to stay out, not Iran. Pro-Iran shia already have the Iraq's government so why would Iran support Sunnis to bomb the troops and make them stay longer?!
Makes sense to me, I learn so much from these forums and thankyou for respecting me to not resort to insults. Iraq was supposed to be about removing Saddam,WMD's,Liberating Iraqi people from supression. Turned out to be a lot more:greed,money ,oil,contracts, and the soliers and civilians caught in the middle. what a mess.
You're welcome.Only people with low intelligence insult or start wars.I wish Iraq war was for liberation.But 3secs after looking at the picture my head tells me no,if it was liberation why US didn't move to save the Darfur people from massacre?It was only money.Bush sucked $1trillion out of US treasury,gave to oil/defense/mercenary corps & probably received his& Cheney's cut in their Swiss accounts.
poor iranians dont understand Israel will level their country and everyone in it soon
IDFisraeli 3 years ago
Iran is the superpower of the middle east now.
Iran will fuck usa in his ass.
persianmafia25 4 years ago
Iran is not the one isolated, It is the America due to thier warmongering and neocon policies. Iran is in stronger position now then ever and will be in better position to defend it's self now. US on the other hand has lost its war with Iraqi and The Afghans.
Can US ever claimed to have won in this 2 front ?
arambash1 4 years ago
Iran just opened two new factories in Syria
Eygept just sent a high-level delegation to Iran for the first time since 1979.
Ahmedinejad was invited to the Gulf Cooperation Council, first time that has ever happened.
Saudi Arabia invited Mr. Ahmedinejad to hajj pilgrimage a first for an Iranian leader since the revolution.
Iran & Turkey have never had better relations
So i think not
U.S. made up the Annapolis conference to make Israel feel better :-( LOL maybe you need a tissue
007savak 4 years ago
I feel so bad for the Palestinians, and the Israelis who desire peace.
Iran scares the heck out of me, I really do think that they've got war on their mind.
InnerDragon103 4 years ago
The Annapolis PEACE TALKS will have an opposite effect on PEACE, and bring the world to the edge of it's own existence. But through this time of trails and tribulations a FALSE PEACE will be achieved, only later to bring on the FINAL BATTLE ON EARTH. All nations of the world will march on JERUSALEM and so too will the KING OF HEAVEN with HIS legion of angels. Who do you think will WIN
777castro777 4 years ago
religous fundamentalism will not help or aide the process of trying to bring people together on common principle and is irresponsible. Preaching that Peace is evil is certainly a fundamentalist and extremist perspective and non-productive.
daderone 4 years ago
Iran feeling isolated? With China (the new world power) I don't think. Also, the Palestinian people are being misrepresented. Bush is only trying to make up for his mess ups, but doing a poor job. The publicity for this was kinda shotty in making him look good. Everyone knows he's just spinning his wheels. The only reason you think Iran is bad is because the U.S. has a problem with Shiate Muslims.
soulphonate 4 years ago
That's just naive, sounds like your the one being fed propaganda.
cllonghorn 4 years ago
Annapolis is a joke. They invited Israelis and US-puppet un-elected palestinian not the Palestinian-elected Hamas. The left the 2 governments who actually care about Palestinians out. By the way Iran's missils are for DEFENSE. Has Iran ever used any to attack anyone?? NO. So please stop watching Fox News lies.
Hesam0000 4 years ago
Not all Irans missles are for defense! Iran does send missles and weapons into Iraq to use against US Military. Fact,not Fox! It is in Iran's interest to do so however creates tensions with US.
bigdavek11 4 years ago
Exactly! Assuming that Iran is actually sending missils to Iraq, that is 100% supporting the efforts to "Defend" Iraq against the foreign occupiers.Please do not forget that US has attacked Iraq without any threat from Iraq, it has killed 600,000+ Iraqis 90% of whom were civilian militia and it has no business being there, but to send Iraqi oil out and use Iraqis as moving targets.Iran has no interest in tension but Bush does, to continue the occupation.
Hesam0000 4 years ago
I doubt USA could afford a war with Iran. Buch is bankrupting this country by staying in Iraq. When will Iraqis assume responsability for themselves and band together to secure thier borders/protect thier new freedoms/and gov. so USA can finally get out? Obama for change in 2008!
bigdavek11 4 years ago
Securing Iraq is only Bush'es excuse for being there. Iraqis have been securing themselves 3000 years before United States was created and they will form a government that is based on majority opinion, in today's case probably Shia, pro-Iran government.
Hesam0000 4 years ago
Removing Saddam was the reason for being there(wmd's and chemical weaponry aside)You must remember him. He attacked Kuwait after his failed attack against Iran.I wonder if USA let him keep Kuwait he would later be able to afford a more sucessful campiagn against Iran but Kuwaitis cried for help and coalition forces responded.
bigdavek11 4 years ago
Actually he attacked Iran with US weapons,US radar support,& with US permission through Rumsfeld & he attacked Kuwait also with US OK after his meeting (again) with Rumsfeld.Plan was to let him attack Kuwait then because of that bomb the hell out of him which Bush father did.Reason to attack Iraq was oil & giving contracts to US corporations.If US cared about dictators it would never support building them in the first place(Parviz Mosharraf, Saudi king, Saddam, Taliban).
Hesam0000 4 years ago
right you are. US supported Hussien but he used that support to overthrow Iraq parliment.Strange how US has a history of supporting those who would turn against it later. The attack on Kuwait was solely Saddams Idea, Not the US. We had better things to do than go half way around the globe to liberate Kuwait.Iraq was Bush jr.'s baby and he and his pals getting rich off this war has many an american pissed off!
bigdavek11 4 years ago
But here is the trick. US didn't go halfway around the world to liberate anyone.The Iraq takeover is an old plan. Kuwait was an excuse to bomb Iraqi military and get Iraq ready for the next stage of war which Bush son started in 2001.And since Bush son needed a second excuse to get US public support for war 9/11 happened.And Bush, instead of concentrating on Osama and southern afghanistan, rightaway moved to Iraq where the oil was.
Hesam0000 4 years ago
Iran let the Iraqi people alone. Iran supports the failure of the new Iraqi elected gov. by arming insurgents so they can benefit from yes, a pro Iran gov. but is also guilty for the many deaths resulting from thier actions. If US pulls out Iran would be swift to take advantage.
bigdavek11 4 years ago
1. Iran should have left the Iraqi people alone after their country attacked Iran and caused half million death and $100bil destruction but Iran still tried to help. It was US who told Iran to stay out, not Iran. Pro-Iran shia already have the Iraq's government so why would Iran support Sunnis to bomb the troops and make them stay longer?!
Hesam0000 4 years ago
Makes sense to me, I learn so much from these forums and thankyou for respecting me to not resort to insults. Iraq was supposed to be about removing Saddam,WMD's,Liberating Iraqi people from supression. Turned out to be a lot more:greed,money ,oil,contracts, and the soliers and civilians caught in the middle. what a mess.
bigdavek11 4 years ago
You're welcome.Only people with low intelligence insult or start wars.I wish Iraq war was for liberation.But 3secs after looking at the picture my head tells me no,if it was liberation why US didn't move to save the Darfur people from massacre?It was only money.Bush sucked $1trillion out of US treasury,gave to oil/defense/mercenary corps & probably received his& Cheney's cut in their Swiss accounts.
Hesam0000 4 years ago