ALAN WATT: World Smart Grid, The Rise Of Technocracy And Global Fascism

[freebroadcasting]

A conclusion one comes to, after witnessing the PR efforts of the technocratic movement: Auguste Comte and the Technocracy Inc of the 30s have gone sadly misrepresented.

These people were totalitarians, but at least they were honest, objective totalitarians. They said, we wanna turn the people into mindless drones, in a beehive-like system, for the sake of technique and efficiency - the socialist technate. Well, at least they manned up and *said it*.

Their descendency went into vulgarity though.

[TBonePickensetc]

Good point. Its nothing like Mr. Allan Watts thinks... and to turn it into some of paranoid nightmare is not called for.

[AceObrin]

This garbage has 83 views too many. Those are 83 views that could've been spent reading the Technocracy Study Course and learning the truth about technocracy rather than a degraded transmission of misinformation that's more noise than signal.

[freebroadcasting]

@AceObrin

Advocates of technocracy don't need spin doctor facilitators to defend their paradigm. If they are honest "comteians" about it, that is.

[AceObrin]

@freebroadcasting In fact, Technocracy doesn't even need advocacy. It's just that if people are interested, the Study Course is the place to find out. Very simple.

[freebroadcasting]

@AceObrin

Well, I prefer the real stuff, from Comte to the technocracy movement in the US in the 30s, when they were writing about creating an improved soviet system, with an energy-based totalitarian economy. The carbon-based economy.

The british soulmates of the US technocrats at that time, totalitarian sickos like HG Wells, are also good reads.

So, I prefer the real deal, from the founders, because it's clear and somewhat honest. Not watered down, PR-friendly hogwash, the type there is today.

[TBonePickensetc]

@AceObrin ... right on the money with that statement ... The Study Course is pretty much it.

[TBonePickensetc]

One of the dumber of the commentaries on Technocracy can be found here. Based on the Wood stuff which is totally not connected with any thing real. It is a fantasy about Technocracy. The actual group is not connected with the mainstream system and not part of a conspiracy of any kind. It calls for an energy economy based on non monetary economics.

Patrick Wood is completely in the dark. He is money scamming his pathetic opinion. And thats all. Google Technocracy technate for more info.

[freebroadcasting]

@TBonePickensetc

If you're into technocracy, you should be into facts, to some degree at least. To be fair with it, technocracy has the advantage of being objective.

So, if you're into facts, and not just a dialectic thinker (something technocracy supposedly abhorrs) you should know that Patrick Wood just mentions history. Dates, books, ideas. Verifiable, not contestable.

Except to the dialectician, who recreates reality and reinvents history according to his own whims.

[IAMELIPHAS]

@TBonePickensetc Patrick wood... Is that guy in any way related to Thomas woods? That Opus Dei nut who constantly tries to advocate for a "Catholic State"?

If they are... Bunch of nohoper conspiracy nuts. If they're not... well... a bunch of nohoper conspiracy nuts.

[TBonePickensetc]

@IAMELIPHAS Yeah... conspiracy nut is right on. Mostly he monetized it and is trying to sell little packets of information on his 'view' of the subject which is totally not connected... Patrick Wood is a 4th rate intellectual and that is being kind.

There is no connection to carbon accounting and the Technocracy information. Energy accounting is a whole different thing.

[TBonePickensetc]

@TBonePickensetc ... yeah.