Wow some bloke on an island that nobodys ever heard of is a reliable source lol... shows the general attitude these fuckers have when trying to make sense of the world around them.
As for left vs right ...the bbc is public funded so they cannot hold one view over another ...they can only react to opinion polls and public opinion ....if you think the bbc is left-wing that's because more often than not the UK holds a left-wing position. That doesn't stop us from voting in the intellegent right-wing manifesto's. As for being aggressivly critical of US governance ....I think you get the point.
@Kozzy06 Well if you compare it to fox news then yea, it is unbiased. And if you (heaven forbid) compare it to His royal fallaciousness Bill Oriely, then BBC is REALLY unbiased.
I can't believe people think the BBC is unbiased. I'm no right winger or follower of Fox News, but the BBC is so obvious in the way its coverage blatantly tries to positively portray left politics. But because it does it so subtlety, most of the small mined nation created by this phoney news organisation can't see it. Time to get the head out of the sand people, *cue the "you're just a racist" replies*.......
BBC, ITN and Channel Four all do balanced news coverage. The BBC, being the biggest, gets criticised from left and right for reasons which I think are nonsense. As for Sky News, during last year's UK election, I felt some of its coverage favoured the Conservative party. Gordon Brown made an ill advised remark which Sky chose to make public. Kay Burley was vicious towards a movement for fair vote, and Adam Boulton's rant suggested something more.
I couldn't hear properly at first, then I realised it sound better with no sound.
In the UK we have the BBC, ITN and Channel Four, which have had good reputations over the years. ITN has become rather too obsessed with celebrity matters, and the BBC attracts criticism for sending their main news presenter to anywhere a major news story breaks, rather than relying on the on site reporter. Channel Four probably produces the best bulletins. [MORE]
You liberal idiots, including bbc clowns, are all hopelessly leftwing! Thank goodness there is a counter to your liberal bias and drivel. Did you lefties think you could control ALL news outlets? ABC, CBS,NBC,BBC,NYTIMES,WASHPOST.. all left wing drek. By the way Fox destroys you liberals in ratings easily everyday! and for good reason
@baslak56 Well yeah only in america where everyone even democrats in the white house know, that the majority of you fox news fans and republicans are just plain idiotic and retarded. Reagen reign = recession, massive job cuts, Bush reign = two pointless wars, a terror attack, (9/11), and once again.....another recession. Contrast that with the success of clintons reign who cleaned up after the two previous retards and obamas attempts now to clean up after bush. Dumb Yank.
@baslak56 You just can't take it that the majority of people worldwide are centrist and centre-left. Therefore, media, books, games, culture etc reflect that. Not everyone can be a blind ideologue, like you.
Think about this statement for a moment and you might conclude, like everyone else, that it's irrelevant!
The Fox demographic is 70 million* Conservatives (and not all consider Fox a reliable source either), the other 250 million* viewers are split between the rest of the cable news outlets and are provided a “fair and balanced” look at the world through the eyes of many.
O Reilly is like a parody of a parody. Im pretty sure half of his audience now watch him to laugh. The guy is a complete and utter joke. The Americna televised equivalent of The Daily Mail
The BBC is flawed but, along with al jazeera, they cover the news in the way it should be covered. I still watch a lot of O Reilly on YouTube though, but for completely different reasons.
Lol Benny Goodman sounds like an American name not a British one ^^ I guess its hard to find someone outside of America to say Fox News is good so they just have to invent one!
firstly, who the hell is called benny goodman, secondly who the hell uses, "beat into a cocked hat" also, if he is from the uk. why would he watch fox? all it is, is political news basically anything to bash obama. plus surely he'd just watch sky (which is also owned by murdoch)
FAUX NEWS is radical right wing propaganda. There have been studies done showing republican candidates get elected when fox moves into a new area.
We need to stop electing these republican morons they are giving out handouts to corporations, but screaming about giving relief to those who lost their job due to the bush recession.
Fake news (fox news) is the most bias right wing news channel, all the people that work there are clowns, pathetic people, the most unfair and unbalanced they slogan should be pathetic news channel that only pathetic people watch
I have since found out the BBC is funded by the British public. Every British citizen pays for the BBC through a tax. We should do this for National Public Radio and Television. We could make it an option on our tax forms. Then hopefully the US public will be better informed. Another option would be to make it illegal for any media service to be owned exclusively by one corporation. .
What the massive Faux News channel can't use the internet to find the meaning of Cocked Hat. Definition - damage or spoil completely. Basicaly the guy said Fox was more screwed up than the BBC. The fact that Orielly and Faux News pretends to not know the meaning of the word and make fun of the guy shows that the guy from the Isle of Wight was correct.
Does anyone even care what Fox thinks of the BBC. The difference between the Beeb and Fox is that the Beeb don't run segments claiming they're better than Fox (or anyone else), because they don't need to.
how can the bbc be biased and anti american. during a programme called the one show, about two days ago, and american blamed every briton on the world for the oil spill, and not one of the presenter's even mentioned it. can you ever see that happening if you blamed america for the global recession? no.
Well, its impossible to say its a fact that the BBC spreads aniti-american sentiment. there is no such thing as a fact when related to interpretation of what is or what isnt anti-american.
I have never met a fellow Brit with the name "Benny".
And yes we can see FoxNews in the UK and to say "it beats the BBC into a cocked hat" can only mean that someone in the dream world of Fox News invented this.
The BBC is world famous for its accuracy in reporting, and on the rare occassions that it gets it wrong, it tears itself apart apologizing for it.
Anyone here saying that Fox news is better than the BBC news seriously need to be thrown in the DNA FAILED bin. They should not be allowed to procreate. It is OBVIOUS to any inteligent person or anyone with common sence that the publicly paid for BBC is probably the best and unbiased news service in the world. Not the second or 10th best - but the best. Fox has got to be in the bottom 5 news channels in the world - thats including all the government facist run broadcasters of the world.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Fox News is the only one telling the truth. Liberals hate it because they don't want people to know the truth, otherwise, no one would vote for them. History shows liberal policies fail and it's still being proven. Time for you people to vote for conservatives. Note that I did not say anything about "Republican" or "Democratic" there. There is a difference between conservative, liberal, Republican, and Democrat.
Hahahaha history shows liberal policies fail? LOL. Do you know what liberal means? Do you realize that nearly all of the developed world has gotten where it is by way of liberal policies?! You know, civil LIBERty, economic LIBERty... LIBERAL ideas?! If you think Fox News is telling the truth about anything you really need to learn to be more critical. They leave out important details and flat out LIE.
A cocked hat? LOL thats not even a british term its an Irish one, and there just happens to be a prison on the Isle of white so it probably came from there. Fox News isnt worthy to wash the feet of the BBC.
But your overall comedy is better--and at least three US sitcoms are American versions of Brit productions: The Office, All In The Family and Three's Company (I'm showing my age with the last two; I'm afraid I'll have to let you figure out which programmes from UK TV they came from).
But the Americans do produce some good ones, definitely; it's just that the humour is better in British comedy.
well yeah, theres some great Brit sit coms like black adder, Alan Partridge, the Young Ones, Steptoe and Son, Dads Army, Rising Damp etc but the scripts are not as good. I was thinking of Friends, Seinfeldt, and Cheers, which have pace and variety (Large teams of scriptwriters I suppose). We tend to get a lot of tedious one joke sit-coms.
@RIPPING1001 you know why that is though? we have the bbc, itv and channel 4. itv only ever seems to do crap drama and soaps, the bbc does produce some great comedy, but it's just one company. and channel 4, well it also produces some great comedy. the inbetweener's was great.
@RIPPING1001 yea but they rob all of the british ideas for tv shows when they bring out a new show we ve had it here for years office sameless and all the reality shows started with pop idol memba that so were better at the americans at that to lol
Fox and CCN are full of lies, you can read/watch the same new's storys spun a different way in most countries. You need to be smart and open minded to understand what is going on, we are being played by the powers that be. The media is used as a tool to control the population. News used to show us the facks (well, was supposed to do) not discuss personal veiws of a mindless reporter/anker. (like they do on CCN/Fox)
I love the validity of the source here... a sample of an e-mail from some character in the isle of wight... Um OK well we'll all take their word for it then....
Fox News is like any other national news in America... trashy, sensationalist neo-con driven bile. BBC news is a long standing contemporary and poignant instiution and is demanded to meet a constant high standard due to the fact that it is funded by a subscription of a British citizen monetary fund. IT IS NOT SPONSORED BY W.A.S.P.'s
"Fox News is like any other national news in America... trashy, sensationalist neo-con driven bile. BBC news is a long standing contemporary and poignant"
uh actually wrong. They have MSNBC which is like fox, only on the left. And they have CNN which is centrist and to me the most fair of the bunch.
But being fair is not the only thing when it comes to news.What also matters is what they're reporting.The American news media has become "dumb" when it comes to what is News. When Celebrities die they are reported on for 2weeks.When celebrities go to prison you have helicopters chasing their cars as the head home.These are not news,these are just gossip media that should be covered on MTV,not news media
I'd say MSNBC has a few conservative voices--Scarbourgh, Matthews (he can be at times). It's fairly liberal, but I wouldn't label it left really. And to be fair, CNN did have Beck as well as Dobbs, two fairly conservative voices (Dobbs being the slightly more bearable one).
As the BBC has a reputation for quality and is much respected worldwide, it's not surprising that Fox is opposed to it. They would be wouldn't they? Fox is biased trash.
@leizuoer Did I say whether I was concerned as to what a dictionary defines the word to mean in English? I am talking about what the nature of it is pure and simple. Get a symbolic logic text book and then get rid of your logical fallacy of appeal to authority. Then get some logic.
O'Reilly is a great debater; I don't agree with most of his views but he is a good debater. FOX News is trash and shouldn't be considered news but more of a tabloid.
It is impossible to compare the BBC with Fox Television.
The BBC is so much more. A publically funded National Broadcaster that precisely for that reason has lead the World of Broadcasting in terms of standards and scope for more than 90 years with so many 1st's under its belt.
Fox is a widely ill regarded private TV channel from America that people from around the World watch often in disbelief. Its open bias, employment of jokers such as O'Reilly make the clip above laughable.
Benny Goodman from the Isle of Wight - you've clearly been staying in too much and masturbating too much. Get out more and see the world for what it really is.
I as a Brit have mixed feelings. Yes, I get to boost my ego purely on account of being a Brit every time foreigners compliment the BBC, but then I have to pay for them with my license fee, and you lot get to watch the beeb for free! No fair.
Ehh, not quite: We pay for cable or satellite to get the BBC in the first place, and we see ads. Probably not as painful as writing a check for a few hundred pounds every year, but the costs of cable/satelite service, and the time spent watching the ads make up for it. About the only free ride foreigners get with the BBC is from the World Service, which is covered by a Foreign Office grant-in-aid, not the License Fee.
FOX news have just got their panties in a twist because they know they can't hold a real journalistic candle to the BBC. The BBC's superiority quite simply apparent to anyone with half a wit of sense.
Initially, I get upset whenever I see Fox news and their fear mongering rhetoric. But then I see I'm not alone and that practically everyone agrees that they're nothing more than a pathetic tabloid full of crappy crazy hosts and guests.
I'm American and the BBC kicks our media's ass any day. When you watch it you actually see civil discourse (I know its been so long you might not know what that is). Not overrated egomanaic windbags that simply fling around insults the the way a monkey would his own shit.
This is bullsh** as usual from a rupert Murdoch company. The guy is tryin in every single way to scorn thr bbc's reputation, mainly because in the UK noone watches his channels.
It beggars believe that any high profile network would label another as "anti American" and under the slogan "sympathy for the enemy?" granted the clip is quite short but he offered no validation of this so called fact. This clip just stinks of propaganda. There certainly aren't many networks that would stoop this low, I'm really shocked.
@breuer85 Wow, liberals are always the first to compare Conservatives to nazis when they don't realize that they are being hypocritical. Fascism is literally defined as Nationalist Socialism; Socialism is a liberal platform component, not a Conservative one. Hence the National Socialist Party that became the nazi party in Germany. They even created a National Socialist Bureau. The amount of history that you liberals lack is astounding. The opposite of socialism is Capitalism, not fascism.
Fascism is simply the definition of radical nationalism-led dictatorships.
The Nazi Movement was strictly-conservative in political nature. Anti-gay, racist, recession in thought is the cornerstone (inspired by religion) of the Ridiculously Far-Right thinking processes.
@Hytegia No it's not. Look in any dictionary, Political Science textbook, History textbook, and look up the definition. It says "Nationalist SOCIALISM." Notice how the government still controls all facets of public life but just with a nationalist twist. The opposite of Communism is Capitalism, not fascism. The extreme form of it would be a government run by corporation. No, not in this country mate. You're only spelling it that way because of Guy Faux. You failed 4th grade Brit history class.
Congratulations - you're now an idiot in two languages.
Actually LOOK in the Dictionary, fucktwit. Faux means "Fake." Fascism is a radical, authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Both are the core-values of the far-right.
And I'm from America. I'm also a member of the NRA.
@Hytegia According to Webster's, considered the standard for the English language, Faux means imitation which is not the same thing as fake. Using the firearm example, a imitation/replica of an old firearm is a new reproduction that is meant to show how it looked brand new from the factory. A "fake" is a reproduction that is tweaked to make it look as if it were actually an original firearm from the period (old and torn up). You have just used the logical fallacy of Amphiboly.
You're a fucking Moron. Oxford puts out the Essay and Research paper standards for a global system. If you go into any highschool, they use Oxford's standard structure for Research Papers.
I'm not in the U.K. I'm in the United States. I'm in your fucking military. :|
Give me a gingle instance where a history book says what you're saying.
Wait - you can't? D:
Maybe it's because you've done nothing but lie through your teeth this whole discussion?!
Also, just because a place has it in it's name doesn't mean that it abides by that policy. "The People's Republic of China" (not a Republic), "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" (not Democracy).
They've done what many far-right conservatives lobby all the time for. Super-Nationalism, a Christian-only nation, they crushed the working parties. They "represented" the working-class, but drew their funds from the capitalist Elite.
@Hytegia I don't know what college you went to, perhaps an online one, but that's simply incorrect. It doesn't surprise me considering how you misquoted text from Webster's completely out of context. Is this why you're mad? Because I disproved your point and showed you don't know how to cite source? Look in any Political Science or Western European/Civilization textbook and that's what it says. Oh you're in my fucking military? Which specific unit are you in? I don't believe you for one second.
@Hytegia This is from Encyclopedia Britannica "National Socialism, German Nationalsozialismus, also called Nazism or Naziism, totalitarian movement led by Adolf Hitler as head of the Nazi Party in Germany."
-5 points for thinking that Military = Army. Fucking dolt.
Also, you've failed to make any sort of counter - my point was that anyone can title a movement anything. And you've failed to show how "Fascism" = "Socialism" ; Communism is a device of the Far-Left, with an almost anarchal and spread-out ideal of people in a community working for a common good of others. Fascism is a strong central government caused by fierce nationalism.
Show me how the Republican Party and the Fascists are different:
"They've done what many far-right conservatives lobby all the time for. Super-Nationalism, a Christian-only nation, they crushed the working parties. They "represented" the working-class, but drew their funds from the capitalist Elite."
Zing.
Also - it's a saying. (And no, the internet is not an "ideaology" - the internet is simply an electronic network where smaller networks exchange data and interface.)
@Hytegia By the way Nationalism as in a "nation" refers to a specific group of people bound by ethnicity or race; not by religion. You've made another logical fallacy known as Equivocation when you equated a "nation" with a "state."
What? You're completely ignorant about Native American culture?
Hurr Durr.
Just beacuse a particular culture has a wide array of dieties doesn't make it counter-productive to one-another. Ask the Egyptians, the Greeks, and the Romans who had many different gods and goddesses, but were of the same infrastructure.
You're not only ignorant in Politics, but Religion as well? :0
@Hytegia You don't seem to understand what I meant. I said that different tribes believed in different deities, so even if you're argument that a "nation" pertains to religion was true, it wouldn't apply because they believe in different deities. So again, you're wrong.
@Hytegia Uh no. The right wing has nothing to do with more government. The right-wing has consistently lobbied for less government. And no, if you actually read the Communist Manifesto, the context in which Karl Marx specifically states that his system requires "Central Planning" is with complete and total control of all facets of public life. And second, you're not accounting for the Maya and the other SA tribes. They had a god for just about everything including the sun and "underworld"
I was simply responding to your batshittery about "Religion has nothing to do with culture hurr durr" crock.
And, no - the "Controlling Authority" in Communism is simply to maintain an adequate and equal distribution of supplies. That is true text-book communism.
And it doesn't matter what YOU define "Right" as - a Democratic Republic is in the middle. Far-Right is Fascism. Far-Left is Communism.
Once again - just because someone calls themselves something doesn't mean shit.
@Hytegia Hurr durr, it doesn't. I just provided a counter example to your claim so once again no go for you. I don't know what textbooks you're looking at but they're not Political Science or Historical textbooks. "Central Planning" must be in complete control of public life. According to William Roberts Clark's "Principles of Comparative Politics," the Communist Party in countries like China and North Korea are "small winning coalitions" indicative of dictatorial election rigging.
@Hytegia Once again, what about Fascism or Communism has to do with less government? Did Hitler not have complete control over public life via the SS and the Gestapo? Did Stalin not have complete control over his country via the NKVD?
@Hytegia Hurp a de durp, prove that this is my "definition of right." Under your definition of Right, Stalin would be considered right wing would he not? My definition is the definition of right.
@Hytegia Completely different from most of the tribes you're referring to. Lastly, I wasn't the one who brought the Indians up. You did. I was simply responding to your statement. Therefore, it was you who brought the conversation off track.
@Hytegia The Conservatives, I don't much align myself with the Republican party as much, stand for rights and opportunity for the individual. Individuals compete and the most productive (either by nature or by effort) succeed. Hence the innovation that the US has pioneered over the past century. I am not an "elite" I'm a working class citizen.
@Hytegia I never said "Army" dolt. I did make a counter to your argument, you just responded to my comments one at a time. Communism is a Sociopoliticaleconomic system of totalitarian government control over all facets of public life with a complete absence of capital and social classes. Anarchy? Really? The USSR/China/North Korea was/are anarchic? Do you know what Anarchic means? Common good? I was referring to Fascism as an ideology not the internet, dolt.
I'm talking text-book communism, as described by Karl Marx.
Communism is Left.
Fascism is Right.
In purpose of Politics, the further left you get the less government control is required. The further right you get, the more the government is controlled. Fascism is Far-Right, but Right, none-the-less.
And yes, you asked my "Unit" - which is clear that you automatically assumed that I was in the Army. I am in the Navy. We use Divisions 'round these parts.
@Hytegia You could have also been in the air force but whatever. That's absolutely incorrect; Karl Marx said that his system would not work without "Central Planning" being government control of all facets of public life. Are you really contending that Communism is less government? The right is about less governmnt, hence the opposite of Communism is Capitalism; the extreme form of which would be a government run by a bunch of corporations.
@Hytegia Lie through my teeth ey? I've just provided a counterexample to your argument. Looks like we know whose been lying the whole time. Get the fuck off my internet. By the way, it's not a place, it's an ideology. You've just made the logical fallacy of the Straw Man.
@Hytegia Which has absolutely nothing to do with the right wing. The right wing, i.e. true Conservatives, hold the individual over everything else. If you read on and don't sensor out the part which you didn't like it says "and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition." In Political Science and History textbooks, it's defined as "Nationalist Socialism."
@Hytegia I don't believe for one second that you are a member of the NRA. Again, look at any Political Science textbook, dictionary, or History textbook and it will say "Nationalist Socialism." Socialism is an element of the left therefore Fascism is an element of the left. And both Communism and Capitalism are Socio-political-econmic systems. Even when Karl Marx postulated Communism as an ideal economic system, he said that it wouldn't work without "central planning" i.e. control of social life
@shrinkwrapped balenced hahahahaha, about as balanced as the titanic was when it hit that iceberg. how can a company based network be more balanced by a network owned by a nation?
@shrinkwrapped in what planet you live? my God u are so ignorant Fake news is the most unfair right wing and unbalanced news channel, wake up and smell the cooffe
O'Reilly feels validated because some twat on the Isle of White makes a remark that no-one understands.
Well Bill, I think you are a "Total Wanker" - Look that up, stick it in your cocked hat and smoke it!
ProudAthiest2 2 months ago
Wow some bloke on an island that nobodys ever heard of is a reliable source lol... shows the general attitude these fuckers have when trying to make sense of the world around them.
lanceawatt 2 months ago
"Benny Goodman" LOL! O'Reilly should use a bit more imagination when making up names for his bullshit reviews.
edomiteslayerkenobi 6 months ago
As for left vs right ...the bbc is public funded so they cannot hold one view over another ...they can only react to opinion polls and public opinion ....if you think the bbc is left-wing that's because more often than not the UK holds a left-wing position. That doesn't stop us from voting in the intellegent right-wing manifesto's. As for being aggressivly critical of US governance ....I think you get the point.
temporaldisplacement 6 months ago
BBC is the most fair and unbiased news service I've ever witnessed in my life.
fridsade 6 months ago 2
@fridsade LOL!!!
Are you serious?!
The BBC is very left wing and liberal, and certainly not unbiased! It was the Labours partys mouthpiece for the past 15 years!
Calling the BBC unbiased, thats funny.
Kozzy06 4 months ago
@Kozzy06 lmao
fridsade 4 months ago
@Kozzy06 Well if you compare it to fox news then yea, it is unbiased. And if you (heaven forbid) compare it to His royal fallaciousness Bill Oriely, then BBC is REALLY unbiased.
bigcheesy95 3 months ago
@TheWackadooFuckhead
I like the name. BBC seems left to us because even British Conservatives are closer to democrats than republicans. America is very right-leaning.
demdanglibruls 6 months ago
I can't believe people think the BBC is unbiased. I'm no right winger or follower of Fox News, but the BBC is so obvious in the way its coverage blatantly tries to positively portray left politics. But because it does it so subtlety, most of the small mined nation created by this phoney news organisation can't see it. Time to get the head out of the sand people, *cue the "you're just a racist" replies*.......
TheWackadooFuckhead 6 months ago
BBC, ITN and Channel Four all do balanced news coverage. The BBC, being the biggest, gets criticised from left and right for reasons which I think are nonsense. As for Sky News, during last year's UK election, I felt some of its coverage favoured the Conservative party. Gordon Brown made an ill advised remark which Sky chose to make public. Kay Burley was vicious towards a movement for fair vote, and Adam Boulton's rant suggested something more.
Sky is part owned by Rupert Murdoch.
cbak12sg 6 months ago
@cbak12sg Not quite! He owns 40% of BskyB. However he has 100% voting shares within the company! The other 60% is owned by a silent partner.
XJ9230JX 5 months ago
I couldn't hear properly at first, then I realised it sound better with no sound.
In the UK we have the BBC, ITN and Channel Four, which have had good reputations over the years. ITN has become rather too obsessed with celebrity matters, and the BBC attracts criticism for sending their main news presenter to anywhere a major news story breaks, rather than relying on the on site reporter. Channel Four probably produces the best bulletins. [MORE]
cbak12sg 6 months ago
You liberal idiots, including bbc clowns, are all hopelessly leftwing! Thank goodness there is a counter to your liberal bias and drivel. Did you lefties think you could control ALL news outlets? ABC, CBS,NBC,BBC,NYTIMES,WASHPOST.. all left wing drek. By the way Fox destroys you liberals in ratings easily everyday! and for good reason
baslak56 7 months ago
@baslak56 Well yeah only in america where everyone even democrats in the white house know, that the majority of you fox news fans and republicans are just plain idiotic and retarded. Reagen reign = recession, massive job cuts, Bush reign = two pointless wars, a terror attack, (9/11), and once again.....another recession. Contrast that with the success of clintons reign who cleaned up after the two previous retards and obamas attempts now to clean up after bush. Dumb Yank.
MrSimo552 7 months ago
@baslak56 You just can't take it that the majority of people worldwide are centrist and centre-left. Therefore, media, books, games, culture etc reflect that. Not everyone can be a blind ideologue, like you.
leizuoer 7 months ago
@baslak56 @baslak56 - "Fox destroys you liberals in ratings..."
Think about this statement for a moment and you might conclude, like everyone else, that it's irrelevant!
The Fox demographic is 70 million* Conservatives (and not all consider Fox a reliable source either), the other 250 million* viewers are split between the rest of the cable news outlets and are provided a “fair and balanced” look at the world through the eyes of many.
* these numbers are for argument sake only.
TheInternetWanderer 6 months ago
I go to the BBC when I want news. And i go to Fox when I want a laugh.
It seems people in america are either having a good time or just dont know the difference :(
dillondownie 9 months ago
We can't criticize...we have the daily mail after all...:(
ussumane22 9 months ago
O Reilly is like a parody of a parody. Im pretty sure half of his audience now watch him to laugh. The guy is a complete and utter joke. The Americna televised equivalent of The Daily Mail
ruideng111 9 months ago
last time i checked the BBC is the most popular station in the world
CWGeorgeson3 9 months ago
hypocrisy thy name is fox
jmoon83392 10 months ago
The BBC is flawed but, along with al jazeera, they cover the news in the way it should be covered. I still watch a lot of O Reilly on YouTube though, but for completely different reasons.
imtheotherdave 10 months ago
@imtheotherdave
Same here. O Reilly is always worth a laugh.
artspooner 9 months ago
>Fox News complaining about bias
I've always found that really odd. Also, BBC News is as unbiased a news source as I've seen.
GiantSandles 10 months ago
Lol Benny Goodman sounds like an American name not a British one ^^ I guess its hard to find someone outside of America to say Fox News is good so they just have to invent one!
wranglers575 1 year ago
firstly, who the hell is called benny goodman, secondly who the hell uses, "beat into a cocked hat" also, if he is from the uk. why would he watch fox? all it is, is political news basically anything to bash obama. plus surely he'd just watch sky (which is also owned by murdoch)
flashash2k9 1 year ago
FAUX NEWS is radical right wing propaganda. There have been studies done showing republican candidates get elected when fox moves into a new area.
We need to stop electing these republican morons they are giving out handouts to corporations, but screaming about giving relief to those who lost their job due to the bush recession.
MaudsPas 1 year ago
beats it into a cocked hat? clearly benny is either a victorian cockney, made up by fox, or massively inbred.
mintyvision 1 year ago
They say a country gets the government it deserves, I think it also gets the media it deserves too.
Long live the BBC!!! its not perfect but compared to faux news......i need say no more. and that is fact Mr Bias O'Reilly
BruvaBob 1 year ago
Fake news (fox news) is the most bias right wing news channel, all the people that work there are clowns, pathetic people, the most unfair and unbalanced they slogan should be pathetic news channel that only pathetic people watch
josegeorge1 1 year ago
I have since found out the BBC is funded by the British public. Every British citizen pays for the BBC through a tax. We should do this for National Public Radio and Television. We could make it an option on our tax forms. Then hopefully the US public will be better informed. Another option would be to make it illegal for any media service to be owned exclusively by one corporation. .
pakarpis 1 year ago 2
worst audio ever
getupjumpy 1 year ago
Faux news popularity is a testiment to the failure of education in the US.
Zooni2 1 year ago 3
What the massive Faux News channel can't use the internet to find the meaning of Cocked Hat. Definition - damage or spoil completely. Basicaly the guy said Fox was more screwed up than the BBC. The fact that Orielly and Faux News pretends to not know the meaning of the word and make fun of the guy shows that the guy from the Isle of Wight was correct.
Zooni2 1 year ago
Does anyone even care what Fox thinks of the BBC. The difference between the Beeb and Fox is that the Beeb don't run segments claiming they're better than Fox (or anyone else), because they don't need to.
MrDragon1968 1 year ago 3
BBC engages in anti-american sentiment. That is a fact... With no source given no evidence and no second opinions.
TherealMrChristophel 1 year ago
@TherealMrChristophel What a big fat lie , did u heard that in Faux news ?
josegeorge1 1 year ago
@josegeorge1 no i'm quoting them and stating they gave no sources and no evidence.
TherealMrChristophel 1 year ago
THE AUDIO IS SHITE SON!!
lamiac2411 1 year ago
people, i have done a course is sociology and benny goodman is one of the most common names people use when they make somebody up.
flashash2k9 1 year ago
Fox touts being fair and balanced. We would settle for factual.
pchtermino 1 year ago
how can the bbc be biased and anti american. during a programme called the one show, about two days ago, and american blamed every briton on the world for the oil spill, and not one of the presenter's even mentioned it. can you ever see that happening if you blamed america for the global recession? no.
flashash2k9 1 year ago
Well, its impossible to say its a fact that the BBC spreads aniti-american sentiment. there is no such thing as a fact when related to interpretation of what is or what isnt anti-american.
battycrease1992 1 year ago
lmao if the BBC were watchin this they jus be like, Who the fuck are Fox News.
Fox News = Biased and illinformed
BBC = Biggest Brodcasting Company in the World (and the oldest in history)
ShAdOwChAnNeL1 1 year ago 3
The BBC is the best..it always has been.
Fox News is GARBAGE...and you know thats true because 99.99% of americans believe thats the case.
AlphaDraconis7 1 year ago 3
Since when has the BBC been Anti-American ?
The BBC is GENUINELY unbiased unlike all the mainstream American news channels.
TheSorrow1O1 1 year ago
That is so laughable!
I have never met a fellow Brit with the name "Benny".
And yes we can see FoxNews in the UK and to say "it beats the BBC into a cocked hat" can only mean that someone in the dream world of Fox News invented this.
The BBC is world famous for its accuracy in reporting, and on the rare occassions that it gets it wrong, it tears itself apart apologizing for it.
hauskalainen 1 year ago
Anyone here saying that Fox news is better than the BBC news seriously need to be thrown in the DNA FAILED bin. They should not be allowed to procreate. It is OBVIOUS to any inteligent person or anyone with common sence that the publicly paid for BBC is probably the best and unbiased news service in the world. Not the second or 10th best - but the best. Fox has got to be in the bottom 5 news channels in the world - thats including all the government facist run broadcasters of the world.
Kaldhore 1 year ago 24
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fox News is the only one telling the truth. Liberals hate it because they don't want people to know the truth, otherwise, no one would vote for them. History shows liberal policies fail and it's still being proven. Time for you people to vote for conservatives. Note that I did not say anything about "Republican" or "Democratic" there. There is a difference between conservative, liberal, Republican, and Democrat.
saj19811981 2 years ago
Hahahaha history shows liberal policies fail? LOL. Do you know what liberal means? Do you realize that nearly all of the developed world has gotten where it is by way of liberal policies?! You know, civil LIBERty, economic LIBERty... LIBERAL ideas?! If you think Fox News is telling the truth about anything you really need to learn to be more critical. They leave out important details and flat out LIE.
watermelonygoodness 2 years ago 8
@saj19811981 what the hell has this got anything to do with tiny little bash at the giant which is bbc?.
flashash2k9 1 year ago
@saj19811981 liberal policies fail? how come they haven't in the uk? the nhs has been going for 60 years, and is still going strong.
flashash2k9 1 year ago
This has to be a joke. Comparing BBC to Fox News makes Fox look even more embarrassing than it already is.
RobinScott93 2 years ago 8
Switch between Fox News and Sky News and you won't notice the difference-they are both owned by News Corp!
mubd1234 2 years ago
Fox news is owned by a Brit named Murdock! So is it really American?
pakarpis 2 years ago
@pakarpis he also owns the telegraph and the sun doesn't he?
flashash2k9 1 year ago
A cocked hat? LOL thats not even a british term its an Irish one, and there just happens to be a prison on the Isle of white so it probably came from there. Fox News isnt worthy to wash the feet of the BBC.
Kaldhore 2 years ago 6
To even compare Fox News to the BBC is a joke.......it stands head and shoulders above Faux News.
mickety2001 2 years ago 6
am i the only one that cant hear shit in this clip
caudice 2 years ago 5
The BBC is head and shoulders above FOX. but to be fair, you Americans make much better sit-coms than we do.
RIPPING1001 2 years ago 18
Yea, we Americans are pretty good at concocting stories. A little TOO good.
ChipDunkle9781 2 years ago 6
But your overall comedy is better--and at least three US sitcoms are American versions of Brit productions: The Office, All In The Family and Three's Company (I'm showing my age with the last two; I'm afraid I'll have to let you figure out which programmes from UK TV they came from).
But the Americans do produce some good ones, definitely; it's just that the humour is better in British comedy.
bartonim 2 years ago
@bartonim
well yeah, theres some great Brit sit coms like black adder, Alan Partridge, the Young Ones, Steptoe and Son, Dads Army, Rising Damp etc but the scripts are not as good. I was thinking of Friends, Seinfeldt, and Cheers, which have pace and variety (Large teams of scriptwriters I suppose). We tend to get a lot of tedious one joke sit-coms.
RIPPING1001 2 years ago
@RIPPING1001 you know why that is though? we have the bbc, itv and channel 4. itv only ever seems to do crap drama and soaps, the bbc does produce some great comedy, but it's just one company. and channel 4, well it also produces some great comedy. the inbetweener's was great.
flashash2k9 1 year ago
@RIPPING1001 yea but they rob all of the british ideas for tv shows when they bring out a new show we ve had it here for years office sameless and all the reality shows started with pop idol memba that so were better at the americans at that to lol
ruthio1 8 months ago
bbc kicks the shit out of fox news. at least they dont resort to screaming and cutting off mics when doing a debate.
Nihilanth1982 2 years ago 7
BBC are everything a news station shuould be mr o reilly.
battycrease1992 2 years ago 14
Fox and CCN are full of lies, you can read/watch the same new's storys spun a different way in most countries. You need to be smart and open minded to understand what is going on, we are being played by the powers that be. The media is used as a tool to control the population. News used to show us the facks (well, was supposed to do) not discuss personal veiws of a mindless reporter/anker. (like they do on CCN/Fox)
DigitalCrack202 2 years ago
fox news is cheap - the bbc is available nearly everywhere u go in the world
FreedomTower2012 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Big fake titties that god didnt give you are so biblically corect.
Abstinence only works best...just ask Palin.
Jesus would own a gun, be pro torture and support the bombing of Iraq.
IndiMusicLover 2 years ago
I love the validity of the source here... a sample of an e-mail from some character in the isle of wight... Um OK well we'll all take their word for it then....
Fox News is like any other national news in America... trashy, sensationalist neo-con driven bile. BBC news is a long standing contemporary and poignant instiution and is demanded to meet a constant high standard due to the fact that it is funded by a subscription of a British citizen monetary fund. IT IS NOT SPONSORED BY W.A.S.P.'s
dalgy500 2 years ago 7
"Fox News is like any other national news in America... trashy, sensationalist neo-con driven bile. BBC news is a long standing contemporary and poignant"
uh actually wrong. They have MSNBC which is like fox, only on the left. And they have CNN which is centrist and to me the most fair of the bunch.
facefullofcum 2 years ago 3
facefullofcum:
But being fair is not the only thing when it comes to news.What also matters is what they're reporting.The American news media has become "dumb" when it comes to what is News. When Celebrities die they are reported on for 2weeks.When celebrities go to prison you have helicopters chasing their cars as the head home.These are not news,these are just gossip media that should be covered on MTV,not news media
colbertLOTR91 2 years ago
only on sky television which is owned by rupert murdoch
MegaDanji 2 years ago
I'd say MSNBC has a few conservative voices--Scarbourgh, Matthews (he can be at times). It's fairly liberal, but I wouldn't label it left really. And to be fair, CNN did have Beck as well as Dobbs, two fairly conservative voices (Dobbs being the slightly more bearable one).
bartonim 2 years ago 2
Is this actually comparing the BC to Fox Channel?? OMG he actually think FOX is better !!!!!!!
ORLLY ?????
ItachiRaikiri 3 years ago 3
FOX news is Racist we should all boy-cot...
wait...what?
he won? who, Obama? oh s***
f*** FOX news but f*** the boy-cot, it doesnt matter. America has spoken. FINALLY!
the red-necks are dying off..this country might have a chance.
rythmnsoul1 3 years ago 2
i just thuink foxnews is so rightwing dont watch it its really not fair and its biased all the time but its like a comedy show maybe fr johnnyb.
brommaman40 3 years ago
As the BBC has a reputation for quality and is much respected worldwide, it's not surprising that Fox is opposed to it. They would be wouldn't they? Fox is biased trash.
Sibelius92 3 years ago 8
Comparing Faux to BBC is like comparing dog shit to diamonds. BBC is a professional, world-class News agency.
antidote2010 3 years ago 48
@antidote2010 ther not a news agency ther a broadcasting company, but i see ur point
liampw20 1 year ago
@antidote2010 Way to spell "Fox" right.... This isn't Britain and there is no "Guy Faux" for us to spell everything that way.... World class my ass
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude You spectacular idiot. Get a dictionary. Then get a clue.
leizuoer 7 months ago
@leizuoer Did I say whether I was concerned as to what a dictionary defines the word to mean in English? I am talking about what the nature of it is pure and simple. Get a symbolic logic text book and then get rid of your logical fallacy of appeal to authority. Then get some logic.
NRAdude 7 months ago
Wow, whoever makes the decisions over there at Faux news has some balls of steel.
podunkest 3 years ago 3
O'Reilly is a great debater; I don't agree with most of his views but he is a good debater. FOX News is trash and shouldn't be considered news but more of a tabloid.
b4thecauseETC 3 years ago 3
O'Reilly is good at screaming loudly. That don't make him much of a good debater except in his own eyes.
KungPisstank 3 years ago 5
It is impossible to compare the BBC with Fox Television.
The BBC is so much more. A publically funded National Broadcaster that precisely for that reason has lead the World of Broadcasting in terms of standards and scope for more than 90 years with so many 1st's under its belt.
Fox is a widely ill regarded private TV channel from America that people from around the World watch often in disbelief. Its open bias, employment of jokers such as O'Reilly make the clip above laughable.
EoTRrecorder 3 years ago 38
The best phrased and most logical comment on the internet.
flabbyllama 3 years ago
Fox and credible journalism. O'r(eil)ly?
haribokid1 3 years ago 4
Benny Goodman from the Isle of Wight - you've clearly been staying in too much and masturbating too much. Get out more and see the world for what it really is.
Stealthbong 3 years ago
LOL, sad fact is I doubt that there is a Benny Goodman from Isle of Wight, FOX news probably created him to say how FOX feels about the BBC.
breuer85 3 years ago 10
I as a Brit have mixed feelings. Yes, I get to boost my ego purely on account of being a Brit every time foreigners compliment the BBC, but then I have to pay for them with my license fee, and you lot get to watch the beeb for free! No fair.
steka7 3 years ago
Ehh, not quite: We pay for cable or satellite to get the BBC in the first place, and we see ads. Probably not as painful as writing a check for a few hundred pounds every year, but the costs of cable/satelite service, and the time spent watching the ads make up for it. About the only free ride foreigners get with the BBC is from the World Service, which is covered by a Foreign Office grant-in-aid, not the License Fee.
compboy1 3 years ago
If you had to pay for something like "faux" I guess it'd be easier to sort out your feelings, not sure it'd feel better though...
KungPisstank 3 years ago
Just one more point before I sign off, you gotta love how John O'Rly offhandedly patronises the moron supporting FOX Nothing Network.
"Dunno exactly what that means Mr Goodman but it sounds good!"
Quality journalism, quality..
BritishRed 4 years ago 5
FOX news have just got their panties in a twist because they know they can't hold a real journalistic candle to the BBC. The BBC's superiority quite simply apparent to anyone with half a wit of sense.
BritishRed 4 years ago 9
Initially, I get upset whenever I see Fox news and their fear mongering rhetoric. But then I see I'm not alone and that practically everyone agrees that they're nothing more than a pathetic tabloid full of crappy crazy hosts and guests.
a1mint 4 years ago 6
cocked hat" That is a completely made up phrase and that's a fact... no pias
Lupinflower 4 years ago 2
the bbc has an undisputed reputation for journalism. fox has an undisputed reputation for programing that has nothing to do with news.
jnycnuk 4 years ago 9
Fox thinks they beat BBC? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I've heard it ALL now.
askquestionslater 4 years ago 7
Oh how this station is pathetic (Fox). I sometimes wonder if it's all just a big joke... Hahaha.
nafan08 4 years ago 5
bbc is the best news source, a credit to journalism
fox news is a fucking joke, an insult to journalism
for american news source i usually use the NY times
Nihilanth1982 4 years ago 7
The BBC is generally excellent - Fox News is mostly a bad joke ...
Chaffinch4 4 years ago 6
fox is as fake as news can get
PONYSPITTER 5 years ago 8
And Jon Stewart Bash Fox News all day long ^^
Sonnenbrot 5 years ago 2
Fox News is as Anti American as you can get.
Moviebro 5 years ago 4
THE BBC RULES!
chakotay300 5 years ago 6
Fox news? ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha
:- ))
alex80114 5 years ago 4
I'm American and the BBC kicks our media's ass any day. When you watch it you actually see civil discourse (I know its been so long you might not know what that is). Not overrated egomanaic windbags that simply fling around insults the the way a monkey would his own shit.
funkmasterflex28 5 years ago 6
oh man u just made my day funny
MegaDanji 2 years ago
Oh, BBC has much longer experience and reputation not only in US and UK, but also in all over the world!!
FOX News is just an "entarrainment" channel for Bush supporters.
They have rights to criticize other media, but have no rights to spread crazy view on world-class channel over their viewers.
newsmaniaingaidai 5 years ago 2
Fox news is childish, they throw a tantrum because the BBC has a better reputation and overall better channel
jessemoore 5 years ago 4
This is bullsh** as usual from a rupert Murdoch company. The guy is tryin in every single way to scorn thr bbc's reputation, mainly because in the UK noone watches his channels.
+ fox news balanced? r u high?
tomlewiswalters 5 years ago 3
fox news is complete bullshit. This clip just proves it.
peterforever 5 years ago 3
It beggars believe that any high profile network would label another as "anti American" and under the slogan "sympathy for the enemy?" granted the clip is quite short but he offered no validation of this so called fact. This clip just stinks of propaganda. There certainly aren't many networks that would stoop this low, I'm really shocked.
IainJC 5 years ago 2
What can I say, typical FOX News - Unfair and Unbalanced.
andyee 5 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@andyee Glenn Beck REALLY puts the unbalanced in 'Unfair and Unbalanced' lol.
Altiego 1 year ago
It means that the US is the Wew World Order, and anyone who disagrees shall die!
"Heil Bushler"
P.S. Im in the works of making some videos.....put me on your friends/favorite list to see them
breuer85 5 years ago
@breuer85 Wow, liberals are always the first to compare Conservatives to nazis when they don't realize that they are being hypocritical. Fascism is literally defined as Nationalist Socialism; Socialism is a liberal platform component, not a Conservative one. Hence the National Socialist Party that became the nazi party in Germany. They even created a National Socialist Bureau. The amount of history that you liberals lack is astounding. The opposite of socialism is Capitalism, not fascism.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude -
You're so wrong that it's not funny.
Fascism is simply the definition of radical nationalism-led dictatorships.
The Nazi Movement was strictly-conservative in political nature. Anti-gay, racist, recession in thought is the cornerstone (inspired by religion) of the Ridiculously Far-Right thinking processes.
Also "Faux" means "Fake."
Congratulations - you failed 11th grade English.
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia No it's not. Look in any dictionary, Political Science textbook, History textbook, and look up the definition. It says "Nationalist SOCIALISM." Notice how the government still controls all facets of public life but just with a nationalist twist. The opposite of Communism is Capitalism, not fascism. The extreme form of it would be a government run by corporation. No, not in this country mate. You're only spelling it that way because of Guy Faux. You failed 4th grade Brit history class.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude -
Congratulations - you're now an idiot in two languages.
Actually LOOK in the Dictionary, fucktwit. Faux means "Fake." Fascism is a radical, authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Both are the core-values of the far-right.
And I'm from America. I'm also a member of the NRA.
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia And, let's not forget :
Capitalism is an Economic System. Communism is an Economic System.
Democracy is a Political System. Fascism is a Political System.
Would you like some toilet paper after that bullshit? You seem to have some left on your chin.
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia You do realize you just replied to yourself? What two languages have I been speaking this entire time? Have I not only spoken in English?
NRAdude 10 months ago
@Hytegia According to Webster's, considered the standard for the English language, Faux means imitation which is not the same thing as fake. Using the firearm example, a imitation/replica of an old firearm is a new reproduction that is meant to show how it looked brand new from the factory. A "fake" is a reproduction that is tweaked to make it look as if it were actually an original firearm from the period (old and torn up). You have just used the logical fallacy of Amphiboly.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude -
>Webster's ... standard for the English language.
You're a twit. Oxford dictionary is used in all colleges, and is the set-standard for all Papers and documents written in the college setting:
*not genuine; fake or false*
And, no. Once again, you're a moron. A 3 second search on even your lowly Webster says:
"a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual ..."
It's hyped up Nationalism.
And yes - I shoot sport. Have for 5 years.
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia Uh, no US colleges use Merriam-Websters. This is not the UK my friend
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude -
You're a fucking Moron. Oxford puts out the Essay and Research paper standards for a global system. If you go into any highschool, they use Oxford's standard structure for Research Papers.
I'm not in the U.K. I'm in the United States. I'm in your fucking military. :|
Give me a gingle instance where a history book says what you're saying.
Wait - you can't? D:
Maybe it's because you've done nothing but lie through your teeth this whole discussion?!
NO WAY.
Hytegia 10 months ago
Also, just because a place has it in it's name doesn't mean that it abides by that policy. "The People's Republic of China" (not a Republic), "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" (not Democracy).
They've done what many far-right conservatives lobby all the time for. Super-Nationalism, a Christian-only nation, they crushed the working parties. They "represented" the working-class, but drew their funds from the capitalist Elite.
Wow. Sounds familiar.
Learn history, or GTFO my internet.
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia I don't know what college you went to, perhaps an online one, but that's simply incorrect. It doesn't surprise me considering how you misquoted text from Webster's completely out of context. Is this why you're mad? Because I disproved your point and showed you don't know how to cite source? Look in any Political Science or Western European/Civilization textbook and that's what it says. Oh you're in my fucking military? Which specific unit are you in? I don't believe you for one second.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@Hytegia This is from Encyclopedia Britannica "National Socialism, German Nationalsozialismus, also called Nazism or Naziism, totalitarian movement led by Adolf Hitler as head of the Nazi Party in Germany."
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude -
United States Navy. EOD.
-5 points for thinking that Military = Army. Fucking dolt.
Also, you've failed to make any sort of counter - my point was that anyone can title a movement anything. And you've failed to show how "Fascism" = "Socialism" ; Communism is a device of the Far-Left, with an almost anarchal and spread-out ideal of people in a community working for a common good of others. Fascism is a strong central government caused by fierce nationalism.
Hytegia 10 months ago
Fine:
Show me how the Republican Party and the Fascists are different:
"They've done what many far-right conservatives lobby all the time for. Super-Nationalism, a Christian-only nation, they crushed the working parties. They "represented" the working-class, but drew their funds from the capitalist Elite."
Zing.
Also - it's a saying. (And no, the internet is not an "ideaology" - the internet is simply an electronic network where smaller networks exchange data and interface.)
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia By the way Nationalism as in a "nation" refers to a specific group of people bound by ethnicity or race; not by religion. You've made another logical fallacy known as Equivocation when you equated a "nation" with a "state."
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude -
A Culture can include Religion.
Ask the Native Americans.
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia I don't think a group of people who believed in a wide range of deities would support your claim, would they?
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude -
What? You're completely ignorant about Native American culture?
Hurr Durr.
Just beacuse a particular culture has a wide array of dieties doesn't make it counter-productive to one-another. Ask the Egyptians, the Greeks, and the Romans who had many different gods and goddesses, but were of the same infrastructure.
You're not only ignorant in Politics, but Religion as well? :0
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia You don't seem to understand what I meant. I said that different tribes believed in different deities, so even if you're argument that a "nation" pertains to religion was true, it wouldn't apply because they believe in different deities. So again, you're wrong.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude -
They all had a basic paradigm.
The Great Spirit, and subsequent smaller spirits.
Love how you ignored the actual point of the conversation - the definition of Right and Left. :D
Hytegia 10 months ago
The problem you have is that you fail to recognize that, in the true ideals of Right and Left.
What you're talking about is not a product of all-right or all-left.
Republic Democracy is around the middle of the line - not being total mob-rule democracy (More Left) or a Dictatorship (More Right).
Once again - for any government you have a "controlling authority." That's the basic and broadest definition of a government.
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia Uh no. The right wing has nothing to do with more government. The right-wing has consistently lobbied for less government. And no, if you actually read the Communist Manifesto, the context in which Karl Marx specifically states that his system requires "Central Planning" is with complete and total control of all facets of public life. And second, you're not accounting for the Maya and the other SA tribes. They had a god for just about everything including the sun and "underworld"
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude -
I was simply responding to your batshittery about "Religion has nothing to do with culture hurr durr" crock.
And, no - the "Controlling Authority" in Communism is simply to maintain an adequate and equal distribution of supplies. That is true text-book communism.
And it doesn't matter what YOU define "Right" as - a Democratic Republic is in the middle. Far-Right is Fascism. Far-Left is Communism.
Once again - just because someone calls themselves something doesn't mean shit.
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia Hurr durr, it doesn't. I just provided a counter example to your claim so once again no go for you. I don't know what textbooks you're looking at but they're not Political Science or Historical textbooks. "Central Planning" must be in complete control of public life. According to William Roberts Clark's "Principles of Comparative Politics," the Communist Party in countries like China and North Korea are "small winning coalitions" indicative of dictatorial election rigging.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@Hytegia Once again, what about Fascism or Communism has to do with less government? Did Hitler not have complete control over public life via the SS and the Gestapo? Did Stalin not have complete control over his country via the NKVD?
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude -
You're using your own definition of "Right" again. Your definition of "Right" is about as useless as defining "Right" as a conglomoration of cheese.
Talk to me once you've googled "Political Compass"
Hurp a de durp
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia Hurp a de durp, prove that this is my "definition of right." Under your definition of Right, Stalin would be considered right wing would he not? My definition is the definition of right.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@Hytegia Completely different from most of the tribes you're referring to. Lastly, I wasn't the one who brought the Indians up. You did. I was simply responding to your statement. Therefore, it was you who brought the conversation off track.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@Hytegia The Conservatives, I don't much align myself with the Republican party as much, stand for rights and opportunity for the individual. Individuals compete and the most productive (either by nature or by effort) succeed. Hence the innovation that the US has pioneered over the past century. I am not an "elite" I'm a working class citizen.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@Hytegia I never said "Army" dolt. I did make a counter to your argument, you just responded to my comments one at a time. Communism is a Sociopoliticaleconomic system of totalitarian government control over all facets of public life with a complete absence of capital and social classes. Anarchy? Really? The USSR/China/North Korea was/are anarchic? Do you know what Anarchic means? Common good? I was referring to Fascism as an ideology not the internet, dolt.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@NRAdude -
I'm talking text-book communism, as described by Karl Marx.
Communism is Left.
Fascism is Right.
In purpose of Politics, the further left you get the less government control is required. The further right you get, the more the government is controlled. Fascism is Far-Right, but Right, none-the-less.
And yes, you asked my "Unit" - which is clear that you automatically assumed that I was in the Army. I am in the Navy. We use Divisions 'round these parts.
Hytegia 10 months ago
@Hytegia You could have also been in the air force but whatever. That's absolutely incorrect; Karl Marx said that his system would not work without "Central Planning" being government control of all facets of public life. Are you really contending that Communism is less government? The right is about less governmnt, hence the opposite of Communism is Capitalism; the extreme form of which would be a government run by a bunch of corporations.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@Hytegia Lie through my teeth ey? I've just provided a counterexample to your argument. Looks like we know whose been lying the whole time. Get the fuck off my internet. By the way, it's not a place, it's an ideology. You've just made the logical fallacy of the Straw Man.
NRAdude 10 months ago
@Hytegia Which has absolutely nothing to do with the right wing. The right wing, i.e. true Conservatives, hold the individual over everything else. If you read on and don't sensor out the part which you didn't like it says "and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition." In Political Science and History textbooks, it's defined as "Nationalist Socialism."
NRAdude 10 months ago
@Hytegia Hence the "National Socialist Party" and the "National Socialist Bureau" of Nazi Germany
NRAdude 10 months ago
@Hytegia I don't believe for one second that you are a member of the NRA. Again, look at any Political Science textbook, dictionary, or History textbook and it will say "Nationalist Socialism." Socialism is an element of the left therefore Fascism is an element of the left. And both Communism and Capitalism are Socio-political-econmic systems. Even when Karl Marx postulated Communism as an ideal economic system, he said that it wouldn't work without "central planning" i.e. control of social life
NRAdude 10 months ago
O'reilly really acted like a stupid moron in this one....... "Engages in anti american sentiment", what the hell is that supposed to mean ????
economistBR 5 years ago 3
I am indeed!
shrinkwrapped 5 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Say what you like about Fox News - at least they're balanced.
shrinkwrapped 5 years ago
Shrinkwrapped....you are joking right?
breuer85 5 years ago 9
U NEED A SHRINK SON
pathan123 5 years ago
@shrinkwrapped balenced hahahahaha, about as balanced as the titanic was when it hit that iceberg. how can a company based network be more balanced by a network owned by a nation?
flashash2k9 1 year ago
@shrinkwrapped in what planet you live? my God u are so ignorant Fake news is the most unfair right wing and unbalanced news channel, wake up and smell the cooffe
josegeorge1 1 year ago