Oh, and can we PLEASE knock it off with this stupid astronaut/cosmonaut thing? We're not star travelers, and they're not traveling the cosmos. Neither of us has made it past our own moon. Scientists and engineers are usually so specific with their jargon that other people can't understand them. Why do they persist with this Cold War name game, this constant reminder that we could so easily go back to the horrible way things were?
Wow, I thought the Cold War was over! Our American manned space program is like Microsoft: Once you get something awesome, scrap it and redesign everything. We got the coolest gear and can't afford to use it. The Russians got their R7/Soyuz system tweaked, and now they're the only ones who can put a person into orbit. They only recently quit doing for-profit passenger flights because their services are needed for the ISS. Our stuff is cool, but theirs is very safe and reliable. A fair trade-off.
@dcs002 I guess you haven't been paying attention? They've had a run of quality issues for a while now. Scrapped launches, failed vehicles (luckily just supplies).
@dcs002 Sorry- you're broke, NASA is defunded in order to pay for all your stupid wars without end, and you have to hitch space rides now, like rummies on the side of the road.
@OrderChaosAndWTF We fund the section of our space program that deals with propulsion.
I rather not fly for five years and then develop a new technology that can take us to deep space in a matter of days.than to keep flying these chemical rockets
My Father worked for North American Aviation during the Apollo program. Dad said the biggest differences between the US and USSR programs were our rigorous testing programs and the developemnt of statistic process control. Testing took more time than rushing the latest technology to the launch pad, but in the end, our extra time spent testing led to success. A life lesson here - test first, do second. Dave Ogden, Glen Carbon, Illinois.
@badboybilzer Oh and i looked up what Scalar Interferometry was, and it turns out that doesn teven exist. Some sort of conspiricist theory about weather weapons?
So Id just be quiet if I was you, that or deal in fact, not science fiction.
@badboybilzer People with american passports, but not people born in USA.
Alexander Bell invented the first telephone and guess what, he was a scotsman.
The British invented Radar.
As for thenuclear advances, yes it was done in America but the vast majority of important scientists were Hungarian, Russian, British and Polish. This is fact, look at the names of the staff at Los Alamos.
Just deal with it, americans arent the most important pople in the world. Only the loudest and most violent.
Aww come on the Buran was almost a carbon copy of the shuttle. Although I had no idea it could fly unmanned and that is seriously damn impressive.
Then it got squashed when the hangar they put it in fell down, which doesn't say much for the Russian's priorities really; space vehicles and lots of nukes, but can't build roofs.
Buran and Shuttle are 2 totally different beasts. Buran is more like America's Blackswift Spaceplane. Unfortunately, the Blackswift project too was cancelled due to technical delays and underfunding.
@pogularocky Ah ok, if you say so. Real shame they didn't look after it.
And I don't know how useful the Blackswift was, reusable gliding launch vehicles have turned out to be very expensive and we've got rockets to lift cargo, and heavy lift rockets on the way (hopefully) meh
um we built the fucking atom bomb and then the nuclear bomb then the hydrogen bomb>>>we also inveted mexican food and italian too!!! funny that russa couldnt make a space shuttle that could fly huh huh your a uneducated fuk bag probably living in america on a visa and you cant even say thaks>>>im going to blow the fuck out of russia when im president. USA USA
@MegaKickurass The guys that made the hydrogen bomb werent american pal.
Hungarian, Russian, Polish, Britsh. Most of them had American passports, but only due to immigration from europe dumbass.
Like I said, European and Russian minds, US money. This is the same for most things.
Anyway Americans are europeans. Britain made you after all. Despite what you all like to think, Britain made you all. Youll always just be former colony to us. A successful one, but still just an offshoot of England.
"I am an American" "I am a Russian" "I am a (fill-in-the-blank)"
Seriously; on the Internet, who knows what the hell you really are? With that said; don't bother telling us what country you are from. We can't verify anything.
the N1 was probably the worst rocket of the soviet space industry, and it was sort of an answer to saturn IV, so the soviets shouldnt have focused so much on the USA, if they did not do that, then maybe they wouldnt have collapsed with so much military spending, it was hardly a victory for the USA which still is struggling with its cold war debt, that is spent hugely on military, space, etc
@david1513 - And before someone makes the observation that English might not be David's native language, he said 'our projects'... as in American projects, indicating that Americanized English is his parent tounge.
@david1513 - Your spelling is atrocious, not to mention your non-capitalization of proper nouns and incorrect use of punctuation. Ever heard of a thing called 'Spell-Check"? And then there's your use of words that are just plain incorrect... using "there' instead of correct their. Before you critique others, perhaps a revisit of your remedial English course is in order.
That is what happens if you do not capture the best German rocket scientists like VAN BROWN who engineered all the rockets for the Apollo missions in the 1960's for America.
It's a good thing KKKrushchev fell from power and not built any more of those failed revisionist rockets. Real communism comes from making revolution on earth not competing with the depraved interplanetary expansionist designs of craven imperialism.
iiTzJamo - The initial splitting of a nuclear atom was indeed British and the first sustained nuclear fission reaction was German, but the American involvement in the development of the atomic bomb was substantially more than just mass production. The Manhattan Project was a collaborative effort of England, Canada and the United States; with assistance of captured or exiled scientists from Germany.
@david1513 - Tell me something... why do barely literate people like you insist on demonstrating their intellectual shortcomings by posting belief as fact?
@david1513 - The last bastion of the intellectually challenged... if your argument does not hold up, threaten them with physical injury (which is a crime by the way... even on the internet).
Well David... without resorting to childish, ill-mannered and inappropriate language, or attacking your lineage, I somehow managed [sic] to point out how illiterate your post was. Your response only managed to show these people just how much of an uncouth loser you are. Good job!
@dalek14mc - Skylab was launched on May 14, 1973. Salyut 1 was launched two years earlier on April 19, 1971.
@hellagesoon - Both Russia and the USA developed their rocket/nuclear technologies using captured WW2 German scientists.
@TheIndustrialphreak - It was a simple matter of economics instead of KISS principle. In the 80's, Russia was running out of money and could no longer afford to spend money on OPTIONAL programs like space, since both countries already had spy satellites in orbit.
fuk who cares which country does wat. im just stoked that human beings are so clever and can manage such a task, america, russia fuken watever its just a name of a peice of land run by a group of people, we are all the same anyway who cares.
Good points, im not sure you could see a rocket launched in kazakshtan from florida though.. Is the weather better at night? Serious question i didnt think about that.
Lol, rockets as bad as thier cameras. Funny stuff. LOOK here gnark1ll...the soviets make some cool rockets and pushed space exploration but the buran is not a good example to use my friend. An exact aerodynamic copy of thier competitors spaceship and it flies one automated flight because no one wanted to see cosmonauts blow up. Why was it launched at night?...food for thought. Me russian make spaceship
@billyallred Weather is always better at night. I don't really know the reason, but it seems plausible. Also, launching it at night in russia means it would be launch during the day US time, and also.. You can see rockets launched at night for quite a long ways out... They tend to light up the place.
The Soviet Union also set the record for the biggest rocket explosion when one of these poorly-engineered pieces of crap blew up and took the launch complex with it.
"Twenty-four astronauts have been on or near the Moon. Twelve of these
landed on the moon and actually walked on its surface. All are men
from the United States of America who traveled to the Moon as part of
NASA's Apollo program during the period from December 1968 to December
1972..."
gnark1||1us doesn't seem to have any idea about the significance of landing men on the moon or of the extreme difficulties involved in doing so. No one else has even come close.
People need to educate themselves before commenting. The Soviet Union did everything in space first, except moon landing. I struggle to think of soemthing the US did first other than that. Even the current automated spaceplane, the Russians did that years ago with the Buran.
Americans always like to think its they that do everything first, where the fact is, its usually Europeans(and Russians) that actually do it, but with US money. i.e some yanks even think Ben Franklin invented electricity!
@gnark1ll1us (he proved lightning was electric) The revisionism they display is pretty annoying. I dont even buy that the Wright brothers were first in powered flight. I think its more like they were the first to FILM it, and amaze the world. There are dozens of other engineers from up to 2 or 3 centuries earlier who can claim to have made the first powered flight. A lot of Yanks probs think they invented cars, computers, the internet, printing press. US-centric Wikipedia doesnt help either!
@gnark1ll1us The Wright brothers weren't the first to get a powered "heavier than air" machine off the ground by its own power. There had been a few short hops before. But, most certainly, their machine was the first to make a CONTROLLED flight. They could control it all three axis, which no one hade manage to show before.
@gnark1ll1us No, Soviet didn't do "everything in space, except moonlandings" first. USA made the first manned docking and the first manned circumlunar flight. USA also made the first change of orbit with a manned spacecraft. And, built and flew the first reusable spacecraft.
@gnark1ll1us What the US did first in space: First rendezvous, first men around the moon, first docking between spacecraft, first (and only) men on the moon. While the Russians did do a lot of things before the US, the US also accomplished technologically important items. Just saying
@BloodHound0827 Well that is only a partial list still. NASA are unsurpassed in all manner of space tech. First to jupiter saturn neptune, I think Mercury too? Ill check. Its just American revisionism in history where 'USA invented or did everything first' that annoys me and others.
The only thing about NASA , is how much money they spend on manned space flight, when the potential benefits from their incredible unmanned missions is FAR greater. I would take 1 Voyager over 10 Apollo for instance.
@gnark1ll1us First orbital rendezvous, first manned docking, first successful interplanetary craft, first to have a craft orbit another planet, first to land a craft on another planet, first rovers, are just some. Also, what? The Buran was first flown unmanned in 1988, then was never flown again after cancellation in 1993, then was destroyed in 2002. The Space Shuttle was first flown on a manned mission in 1981. To say Buran was first is just a blatant lie.
@Zeus0Moose Buran was the first automatic spaceplane.
Thats what I said, can you not read?
Like i said, NASA is amazing, but Americans dont do everything first, and most of what they do is actually a multinational effort, but NASA has to pretend its american to appease the idiotic american public.
Take the Rover due for launch tomorrow. NASA mission, US money, US flags all over it, but ESA and Russian brains and manpower. Same as always.
@gnark1ll1us WRONG! The MSL project (Curiosity) is managed by the Jet propulsion laboratory and California institute of technology. Now, if you think that these facilities are all populated by ESA and Russian astrophysicists, please provide evidence of this, or you just look like you don't want to give the US credit. I'm not saying Europe and Russia have not contributed to space exploration, but they are not leading it.
@Zeus0Moose Yeah I know its a JPL mission. My point in all this is to point out the annoying American habit of claiming they invented everything. Look at the guy above making out USA invented telephones and radars and things. Even a fictional weather weapon alegedly invented by Tesla!
Anyway,no way am I disrespecting JPL or NASA. They are peerless. Its just worth pointing out that they are multinational companies, not just American.
Anyway, Fingers crossed for MSL, Im watching the launch now!
@Zeus0Moose Surely first to land on another planet was Venera?and before that Luna 9. Also wasnt the first rover also Russian? The moon rover series called Lunokhod?
@gnark1ll1us First rovers on other planets. And Venera completely slipped my mind. Also, soon-to-be first to launch a spacecraft out of the Solar System with the Voyager program. Add in first untethered spacewalk too. Also, IIRC NEAR Shoemaker was the first craft to orbit and land on an asteroid. Stardust was the first to not only got to a comet and take samples but bring it back, too.
Anyway, I regret making an issue out of 'first' here, when you see missions like MSL on its way safely, it makes me wish we could all come together as humanity to explore space. I do worry still about NASA. Not many flagship missions coming up, JWST is an exception. I just wish they didnt concentrate so much on manned flight. I always have the opinion for instance that Voyager is far and away mankinds most important space mission. Even over Apollo
@gnark1ll1us I think Apollo being successful is basically what made people open to letting things like Voyager happen. For now I agree, manned flight is second place as long as we stay in LEO. But I cannot wait to see interplanetary manned missions, so we could hopefully start spreading to other worlds.
@gnark1ll1us The space shuttle came before the Buran you fuckhead. And if you want to know about US firsts in space, try reading about them, there are loads.
Look at the words I used. 'Automated spaceplane' were among those words, correct fuckhead? Buran was test flown into orbit on several occasions without crew, thus automated. The shuttle required a crew. I made the comment in response to people who thought the X37b was the first.
Now for the love of God please read what is written before commenting you total fucking moron. I dont expect you to reply, people that get owned on the net rarely do. prick.
@gnark1ll1us The fact that the Buran was non piloted is not special you dumbass. It is in fact a sign of inferiority. The Space Shuttle has complex life support systems. Manned flight also shows a confidence of design. The Buran was just a pathetic attempt by the Soviets to try and prove that they still had it together. Putting men in space is many orders of magnitude more expensive and complicated than a non piloted craft. Most rockets even today are still unmanned.
"Buran was test flown into orbit on several occasions without crew"
Correction: Buran was flown once. It wasn't a huge accomplishment that it was unmanned. Earlier USSR and USA spacecraft had flown unmanned missions prior to being crewed, although the Space Shuttle was not one of them. Future versions of the Buran would have had life support systems for crewed missions.
Also, if you're looking for US firsts: orbital rendezvous; orbital docking; high orbit; long duration.
@MP312C On the contrary, the NK-33 rocket engine is the highest performance rocket engine ever created. When it was discovered in the 1990s that there was still a stockpile of them in storage in Russia, the Americans couldn't wait to get their hands on them as they had nothing comparable.
@Mechness ...actually, the Rocketdyne F-1 was the most powerful single-barrel rocket engine ever built, at 1.5 million lbf (6.77MN) thrust, about four times as much as the NK-33. (RD-180 is more powerful, but is a four-chamber design.) NK-33, however, is the most *efficient* kerosene/oxygen rocket ever built (highest specific impulse, highest thrust-to-weight); even so, the N1 used the earlier, less-efficient NK-15 engine instead.
@rdfox76 Though I understand that the NK-33 was designed as part of the N-1 program, even if it never made it onto a rocket. The Russian program was started well after Saturn V, comparatively underfunded, and cancelled after these launch failures, but it wasn't the rocket engines that let them down it was the failure of the control systems to recover correctly from problems as it was designed to do.
Their rocket engines are still good, but soviet electronics and computers sucked bigtime.
Looks like a bunch of americans commented just to bring Russians and fans of Russian aerospace down...just because they wost their wittle shuttle...AWWWWW *pout*. With friends like these, who needs, erm, terrorists. Anyway, it's a shame about this rocket, huge, beautiful.
@ 1chemodan: You're right. 75% of the tech on the ISS was created by taking out the trash and delivering the groceries (Russia's contribution). Russia is the desperate housewife of the modern space race; get over it. The US doesn't even have competition anymore or we would have been on Mars five years ago.
I am an American, one thing i think the Russians created gorgeous machines, pure brute mechanical engineering beauty. Theirs a reason why they have continued to use the same rocket for 45 years compaired to our retarded NASA program that spend billions of dollars every year and dont stick with one launch medium. ever hear of the term KISS?
@TheIndustrialphreak It's funny when someone is calling someone else stupid, and in doing so writes the word "Theirs" instead of "There's" (among your other stupid mistakes). HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Insult FAIL!!
@fkagiantfish common fuckers, everybody says anything he likes about us, russia, uk, hitler, big bang, supernovae, god or any other shit. This is youtube not congress.
And what kind of dick did america put in your ass to make you back it so strong?
@robin100012001 so, it says a whole fucking lot when you are supporting praise for hitler and comments against god. i can speak for every non prejudice American when i say WE DON'T WANT YOU IN OUR COUNTRY! YOU GONNA BE THIS IGNORANT THEN YOU CAN JUST LEAVE!
Nice rocket, it just had too many engines. Too many points of failure. Even the Saturn only had 5 engines and on some missions they lost an engine in flight.
Soviet/Russian rocket technology was cutting-edge at this time. Still make good rockets/engines! It's just the uninspired-looking spacecraft designs that I don't like. The Russian spacecraft have always looked as ugly as a box of hammers, in my opinion. And it's about time Russia makes a new spacecraft...I know Soyuz "works," but after 45 years, you'd think they could make a newer, better design.
@mlovmo dude, most things today, are based on last century stuff... innovation! thats what happened, and there are new designs, the proton M rocket is fairly new
This is the second test of the N1, designated N1-5L. A bolt got sucked into a fuel pump, which made the engine blow up. The onboard computer, rather than compensate by turning off just the engine across from it, shut down all 29 remaining engines. The rocket fell back on the pad, completely destroying it in the biggest rocket explosion in the Space Race.
Amazing how many sheeple are bleating out how bad Soviet technology supposedly was. They've clearly never seen how many attempts it took for the US space program to get its own moon shot going.
Apollo 1 burned, killing all three astronauts inside. The prototype for the lunar module crashed, nearly killing the test pilot. Not to mention the dozens of unmanned test shots in the 50s and early 60s that blew up on the launch pad.
In 80's modified engines of N-1 rocket, that was ready to launch in 1974, were tested on 250 site of " Buran " project , that utilised many buildings of Lunar N-1 program, including both launching pads (110, 250). They burn out perfect, the same perfect was the only unmanned flight of Buran spaceship in 80's. Both programmes consumed 20 billions $, were reply to US " Apollo" and " Shuttle" programmes, but contrary resulted only in museum exposure of products. USSR was gone and technology sold.
the problem with this rocket was that they build it in a hurry to beat the apollo program but it had a lot of technical errors such as poor engineering and the inability to make 15 rocket engines work together at the same time
@kbt3s9 you're a dreamer, the technology tested here has been used to build the most reliable rockets in human history, the principle was so revolutionary that the science behind the issues associated with the concept was stil unknown. Within a few years the problems were solved mathematically and applied to the next generation of heavy lift launchers.
@eMPCreators You can never say the N1 was in any stretch of the imagination a good rocket. The plumbing was overly complex (as it should be for 30 main engines). Transportation by train hurt the rocket with vibration. Kerosene in every stage. Very poor design.
@BassGuitarGuy128 Yea.. first satellite in Space, first animal in Space, first human in Space, first Space Station, first to start building ISS... So what exactly you're laughing about ?
@Makrozon Russia also killed the first animals in space, the first person in LEO, the first and only people in space, they may have achieved a lot of firsts, but it was at a very high cost. They cut corners to be first and didn't care who died.
Key word "first." That's all the Russians focused on. They cared very little about safety and did everything half-assed. The Americans, though they worked hard to be first, still kept safety in mind. Lastly, the Russians were first only by a couple of months for these feats, which is not an acceptable way to gauge which country had the better technologies. Being first means very little. Last but not least, the United States was able to execute 6 successful missions to the moon.
@PootleMoonpig-Truly, you're just another arrogant european, it's funny how your snooty ego causes you to post nothing but insults after you have been refuted. Good day. :)
@BassGuy128 how can you argue if you dont know shit? watch space race made by americans or britains not sure and get informed that when russians went to space you finaly used german scientist to make a rocket. the funny thing is 80% of americans think they won the race.
@zoodensha - SOVIETS first landed on the moon, placed a satellite there, in 1959. In 1970 they landed a rover, collected samples and returned them to earth....Take caution when you belittle competitors, arrogance will fail you.
Idiot, last I noticed the wonderful US had retired its entire space shutte fleet because it was unsafe to fly and has no way to get men into orbit any longer..... Anyway, the US only made it to the moon thanks to the collaboration with known nazi scientist mass murderers with hands dripping with human blood. Kennedy was an idiot too, druggy, immoral deceitful serial shagger and warmonger. But Americans love a pretty boy don't they.
@eMPCreators So what your saying is your leaders pussied out to an idiot during the Cuban missile crisis? Well no wonder the USSR has been dead for twenty years now and Russia is nothing but a taxi service to the waste of money ISS. America has invented so many things that changed the world like the light bulb, airplane, telephone, television, internet, GPS and on and on. Russia is a complete non-factor in todays world. America is wary of the Chinese, No one gives shit about Russia fucktard.
@Alexei55555 The TV doesnt have any 1 inventor. It was several people that came up with the tech that eventually evolved into the TV. If you wanted to give credit, you'd have to credit a russian an american and an englishman. BBC was the first to broadcast publicTV signals, an american was responsible for making it fully electronic(no moving parts) and then an englishman was also responsible for bringing in "color"
Misleading title with a SPAS rifle instead of rocket??? Huh - booooooooooo!!
strizhi 1 week ago in playlist millitary
Why so many negatives¿
Barnekkid 3 weeks ago 2
what is the song?
itislupus08 2 months ago
@itislupus08 Right here right now by fatboy slim
samthekingyo 2 months ago
nope, chuck testa
thewii552 2 months ago
N1 TO THE MOON
21boxhead 2 months ago
Oh, and can we PLEASE knock it off with this stupid astronaut/cosmonaut thing? We're not star travelers, and they're not traveling the cosmos. Neither of us has made it past our own moon. Scientists and engineers are usually so specific with their jargon that other people can't understand them. Why do they persist with this Cold War name game, this constant reminder that we could so easily go back to the horrible way things were?
dcs002 3 months ago
@dcs002 You seem very cynical. I like that.
Barnekkid 3 weeks ago
Wow, I thought the Cold War was over! Our American manned space program is like Microsoft: Once you get something awesome, scrap it and redesign everything. We got the coolest gear and can't afford to use it. The Russians got their R7/Soyuz system tweaked, and now they're the only ones who can put a person into orbit. They only recently quit doing for-profit passenger flights because their services are needed for the ISS. Our stuff is cool, but theirs is very safe and reliable. A fair trade-off.
dcs002 3 months ago
@dcs002 I guess you haven't been paying attention? They've had a run of quality issues for a while now. Scrapped launches, failed vehicles (luckily just supplies).
vipervnm 3 weeks ago
@dcs002 Sorry- you're broke, NASA is defunded in order to pay for all your stupid wars without end, and you have to hitch space rides now, like rummies on the side of the road.
Too bad. You had so much going for you.
How are the Mandarin lessons going?
baghend 1 week ago
Comment removed
bluehenchem1st 5 days ago
@baghend You must haven't heard of VASIMR.
Which is more advanced than anything the Russians, or the Chinese have.
And it's being tested in 2014.
AntiMatter3000 3 days ago
@dcs002 I'm glad that we shut down our shuttle program.
Chemical propellant is so freaking outdated.
AntiMatter3000 3 days ago
@AntiMatter3000 So what do we use next?
OrderChaosAndWTF 1 day ago
@OrderChaosAndWTF We fund the section of our space program that deals with propulsion.
I rather not fly for five years and then develop a new technology that can take us to deep space in a matter of days.than to keep flying these chemical rockets
AntiMatter3000 1 day ago
Soviet space program: rockets in space, starvation on the group.
hsfbunny 3 months ago
My Father worked for North American Aviation during the Apollo program. Dad said the biggest differences between the US and USSR programs were our rigorous testing programs and the developemnt of statistic process control. Testing took more time than rushing the latest technology to the launch pad, but in the end, our extra time spent testing led to success. A life lesson here - test first, do second. Dave Ogden, Glen Carbon, Illinois.
davidkirkogden 3 months ago
scrolling down..i laugh as i see long comments from ignorant assholes trying to prove themselves smarter than the last.
babalooga12 3 months ago
@badboybilzer Oh and i looked up what Scalar Interferometry was, and it turns out that doesn teven exist. Some sort of conspiricist theory about weather weapons?
So Id just be quiet if I was you, that or deal in fact, not science fiction.
gnark1ll1us 3 months ago
@badboybilzer People with american passports, but not people born in USA.
Alexander Bell invented the first telephone and guess what, he was a scotsman.
The British invented Radar.
As for thenuclear advances, yes it was done in America but the vast majority of important scientists were Hungarian, Russian, British and Polish. This is fact, look at the names of the staff at Los Alamos.
Just deal with it, americans arent the most important pople in the world. Only the loudest and most violent.
gnark1ll1us 3 months ago
Aww come on the Buran was almost a carbon copy of the shuttle. Although I had no idea it could fly unmanned and that is seriously damn impressive.
Then it got squashed when the hangar they put it in fell down, which doesn't say much for the Russian's priorities really; space vehicles and lots of nukes, but can't build roofs.
cjeam9199 3 months ago
@cjeam9199
Buran and Shuttle are 2 totally different beasts. Buran is more like America's Blackswift Spaceplane. Unfortunately, the Blackswift project too was cancelled due to technical delays and underfunding.
pogularocky 3 months ago
@pogularocky Ah ok, if you say so. Real shame they didn't look after it.
And I don't know how useful the Blackswift was, reusable gliding launch vehicles have turned out to be very expensive and we've got rockets to lift cargo, and heavy lift rockets on the way (hopefully) meh
cjeam9199 3 months ago
um we built the fucking atom bomb and then the nuclear bomb then the hydrogen bomb>>>we also inveted mexican food and italian too!!! funny that russa couldnt make a space shuttle that could fly huh huh your a uneducated fuk bag probably living in america on a visa and you cant even say thaks>>>im going to blow the fuck out of russia when im president. USA USA
MegaKickurass 3 months ago
@MegaKickurass The guys that made the hydrogen bomb werent american pal.
Hungarian, Russian, Polish, Britsh. Most of them had American passports, but only due to immigration from europe dumbass.
Like I said, European and Russian minds, US money. This is the same for most things.
Anyway Americans are europeans. Britain made you after all. Despite what you all like to think, Britain made you all. Youll always just be former colony to us. A successful one, but still just an offshoot of England.
gnark1ll1us 3 months ago
Man, all that buildup, and you cut fatboy slim short.
anduril891 3 months ago
Typical Youtube postings start with:
"I am an American" "I am a Russian" "I am a (fill-in-the-blank)"
Seriously; on the Internet, who knows what the hell you really are? With that said; don't bother telling us what country you are from. We can't verify anything.
SteveLLW 3 months ago
@SteveLLW oh who the hell do you think you are?shut the fuk up. you ain't the4 youtube police
Acecombatgamertwo 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Acecombatgamertwo "oh who the hell do you think you are?shut the fuk up. you ain't the4 youtube police"
You're under arrest, asshole. Up against the keyboard. Keep your hands where I can see them. Don't even THINK about touching that wireless mouse!
SteveLLW 3 months ago
i just bukkaked my monitor
DancingSpiderman 3 months ago
Needs MORE BOOSTERS!
drbackjack 4 months ago
cream gravy
hgbguy 4 months ago
the N1 was probably the worst rocket of the soviet space industry, and it was sort of an answer to saturn IV, so the soviets shouldnt have focused so much on the USA, if they did not do that, then maybe they wouldnt have collapsed with so much military spending, it was hardly a victory for the USA which still is struggling with its cold war debt, that is spent hugely on military, space, etc
iam1and1isme 4 months ago
Comment removed
david1513 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@david1513 - Its no wonder that most Europeans consider the United States to be just like the movie Idiocracy.
TheUnmercifulOne 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@david1513 - And before someone makes the observation that English might not be David's native language, he said 'our projects'... as in American projects, indicating that Americanized English is his parent tounge.
TheUnmercifulOne 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@david1513 - Your spelling is atrocious, not to mention your non-capitalization of proper nouns and incorrect use of punctuation. Ever heard of a thing called 'Spell-Check"? And then there's your use of words that are just plain incorrect... using "there' instead of correct their. Before you critique others, perhaps a revisit of your remedial English course is in order.
TheUnmercifulOne 4 months ago
@david1513 - I invite you to google Operation_Alsos.
TheUnmercifulOne 4 months ago
lol! love that russian "tech"!
MaryStewart 4 months ago
Thats a real bummer =/
superotherguy1 4 months ago
That is what happens if you do not capture the best German rocket scientists like VAN BROWN who engineered all the rockets for the Apollo missions in the 1960's for America.
teomeimf 4 months ago
@teomeimf You mean Von Braun?
AgrivatedKillah 3 months ago
It's a good thing KKKrushchev fell from power and not built any more of those failed revisionist rockets. Real communism comes from making revolution on earth not competing with the depraved interplanetary expansionist designs of craven imperialism.
MaoismLinBiaoism 5 months ago
@MaoismLinBiaoism What happened to being "red and expert"? Technology has no political affiliations.
technatezin 4 months ago
iiTzJamo - The initial splitting of a nuclear atom was indeed British and the first sustained nuclear fission reaction was German, but the American involvement in the development of the atomic bomb was substantially more than just mass production. The Manhattan Project was a collaborative effort of England, Canada and the United States; with assistance of captured or exiled scientists from Germany.
TheUnmercifulOne 5 months ago
Comment removed
david1513 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@david1513 - Tell me something... why do barely literate people like you insist on demonstrating their intellectual shortcomings by posting belief as fact?
TheUnmercifulOne 4 months ago
Comment removed
david1513 4 months ago
@david1513 - The last bastion of the intellectually challenged... if your argument does not hold up, threaten them with physical injury (which is a crime by the way... even on the internet).
Well David... without resorting to childish, ill-mannered and inappropriate language, or attacking your lineage, I somehow managed [sic] to point out how illiterate your post was. Your response only managed to show these people just how much of an uncouth loser you are. Good job!
TheUnmercifulOne 4 months ago
@dalek14mc - Skylab was launched on May 14, 1973. Salyut 1 was launched two years earlier on April 19, 1971.
@hellagesoon - Both Russia and the USA developed their rocket/nuclear technologies using captured WW2 German scientists.
@TheIndustrialphreak - It was a simple matter of economics instead of KISS principle. In the 80's, Russia was running out of money and could no longer afford to spend money on OPTIONAL programs like space, since both countries already had spy satellites in orbit.
TheUnmercifulOne 5 months ago
@TheUnmercifulOne Atom bomb designed by british scientists engineered by germans and produced by the americans. If my history is correct
iiTzJamo 5 months ago
Comment removed
david1513 4 months ago
I love russa! greetings from Greece!
BobInGreek 5 months ago
fuk who cares which country does wat. im just stoked that human beings are so clever and can manage such a task, america, russia fuken watever its just a name of a peice of land run by a group of people, we are all the same anyway who cares.
andrewbower86 5 months ago
Good points, im not sure you could see a rocket launched in kazakshtan from florida though.. Is the weather better at night? Serious question i didnt think about that.
billyallred 5 months ago
Lol, rockets as bad as thier cameras. Funny stuff. LOOK here gnark1ll...the soviets make some cool rockets and pushed space exploration but the buran is not a good example to use my friend. An exact aerodynamic copy of thier competitors spaceship and it flies one automated flight because no one wanted to see cosmonauts blow up. Why was it launched at night?...food for thought. Me russian make spaceship
billyallred 5 months ago
@billyallred Weather is always better at night. I don't really know the reason, but it seems plausible. Also, launching it at night in russia means it would be launch during the day US time, and also.. You can see rockets launched at night for quite a long ways out... They tend to light up the place.
ronnysoeberg 5 months ago
The Soviet Union also set the record for the biggest rocket explosion when one of these poorly-engineered pieces of crap blew up and took the launch complex with it.
recklessted 5 months ago
@recklessted can you elaborate on that?
kappelmeister123 5 months ago
"Twenty-four astronauts have been on or near the Moon. Twelve of these
landed on the moon and actually walked on its surface. All are men
from the United States of America who traveled to the Moon as part of
NASA's Apollo program during the period from December 1968 to December
1972..."
gnark1||1us doesn't seem to have any idea about the significance of landing men on the moon or of the extreme difficulties involved in doing so. No one else has even come close.
recklessted 5 months ago
People need to educate themselves before commenting. The Soviet Union did everything in space first, except moon landing. I struggle to think of soemthing the US did first other than that. Even the current automated spaceplane, the Russians did that years ago with the Buran.
Americans always like to think its they that do everything first, where the fact is, its usually Europeans(and Russians) that actually do it, but with US money. i.e some yanks even think Ben Franklin invented electricity!
gnark1ll1us 5 months ago 4
@gnark1ll1us (he proved lightning was electric) The revisionism they display is pretty annoying. I dont even buy that the Wright brothers were first in powered flight. I think its more like they were the first to FILM it, and amaze the world. There are dozens of other engineers from up to 2 or 3 centuries earlier who can claim to have made the first powered flight. A lot of Yanks probs think they invented cars, computers, the internet, printing press. US-centric Wikipedia doesnt help either!
gnark1ll1us 5 months ago
@gnark1ll1us The Wright brothers weren't the first to get a powered "heavier than air" machine off the ground by its own power. There had been a few short hops before. But, most certainly, their machine was the first to make a CONTROLLED flight. They could control it all three axis, which no one hade manage to show before.
YDDES 5 months ago
@gnark1ll1us No, Soviet didn't do "everything in space, except moonlandings" first. USA made the first manned docking and the first manned circumlunar flight. USA also made the first change of orbit with a manned spacecraft. And, built and flew the first reusable spacecraft.
YDDES 5 months ago
@gnark1ll1us We Don't think we do everything first just better.
Contoro2 3 months ago
@gnark1ll1us What the US did first in space: First rendezvous, first men around the moon, first docking between spacecraft, first (and only) men on the moon. While the Russians did do a lot of things before the US, the US also accomplished technologically important items. Just saying
BloodHound0827 3 months ago
@BloodHound0827 Well that is only a partial list still. NASA are unsurpassed in all manner of space tech. First to jupiter saturn neptune, I think Mercury too? Ill check. Its just American revisionism in history where 'USA invented or did everything first' that annoys me and others.
The only thing about NASA , is how much money they spend on manned space flight, when the potential benefits from their incredible unmanned missions is FAR greater. I would take 1 Voyager over 10 Apollo for instance.
gnark1ll1us 3 months ago
@gnark1ll1us Your right, they DIED first in space to, but we do it better.
kffive 3 months ago
@gnark1ll1us First orbital rendezvous, first manned docking, first successful interplanetary craft, first to have a craft orbit another planet, first to land a craft on another planet, first rovers, are just some. Also, what? The Buran was first flown unmanned in 1988, then was never flown again after cancellation in 1993, then was destroyed in 2002. The Space Shuttle was first flown on a manned mission in 1981. To say Buran was first is just a blatant lie.
Zeus0Moose 3 months ago
@Zeus0Moose Buran was the first automatic spaceplane.
Thats what I said, can you not read?
Like i said, NASA is amazing, but Americans dont do everything first, and most of what they do is actually a multinational effort, but NASA has to pretend its american to appease the idiotic american public.
Take the Rover due for launch tomorrow. NASA mission, US money, US flags all over it, but ESA and Russian brains and manpower. Same as always.
gnark1ll1us 3 months ago
@gnark1ll1us WRONG! The MSL project (Curiosity) is managed by the Jet propulsion laboratory and California institute of technology. Now, if you think that these facilities are all populated by ESA and Russian astrophysicists, please provide evidence of this, or you just look like you don't want to give the US credit. I'm not saying Europe and Russia have not contributed to space exploration, but they are not leading it.
Zeus0Moose 3 months ago
@Zeus0Moose Yeah I know its a JPL mission. My point in all this is to point out the annoying American habit of claiming they invented everything. Look at the guy above making out USA invented telephones and radars and things. Even a fictional weather weapon alegedly invented by Tesla!
Anyway,no way am I disrespecting JPL or NASA. They are peerless. Its just worth pointing out that they are multinational companies, not just American.
Anyway, Fingers crossed for MSL, Im watching the launch now!
gnark1ll1us 3 months ago
@Zeus0Moose Surely first to land on another planet was Venera?and before that Luna 9. Also wasnt the first rover also Russian? The moon rover series called Lunokhod?
I thnink you need to do some reading.
gnark1ll1us 3 months ago
@gnark1ll1us First rovers on other planets. And Venera completely slipped my mind. Also, soon-to-be first to launch a spacecraft out of the Solar System with the Voyager program. Add in first untethered spacewalk too. Also, IIRC NEAR Shoemaker was the first craft to orbit and land on an asteroid. Stardust was the first to not only got to a comet and take samples but bring it back, too.
Zeus0Moose 3 months ago
@Zeus0Moose well just saw Curiosity off. Epic.
Anyway, I regret making an issue out of 'first' here, when you see missions like MSL on its way safely, it makes me wish we could all come together as humanity to explore space. I do worry still about NASA. Not many flagship missions coming up, JWST is an exception. I just wish they didnt concentrate so much on manned flight. I always have the opinion for instance that Voyager is far and away mankinds most important space mission. Even over Apollo
gnark1ll1us 3 months ago
@gnark1ll1us I think Apollo being successful is basically what made people open to letting things like Voyager happen. For now I agree, manned flight is second place as long as we stay in LEO. But I cannot wait to see interplanetary manned missions, so we could hopefully start spreading to other worlds.
Zeus0Moose 3 months ago
@gnark1ll1us The space shuttle came before the Buran you fuckhead. And if you want to know about US firsts in space, try reading about them, there are loads.
njdevil281 3 months ago
@njdevil281 You are the fuckhead, fuckhead.
Look at the words I used. 'Automated spaceplane' were among those words, correct fuckhead? Buran was test flown into orbit on several occasions without crew, thus automated. The shuttle required a crew. I made the comment in response to people who thought the X37b was the first.
Now for the love of God please read what is written before commenting you total fucking moron. I dont expect you to reply, people that get owned on the net rarely do. prick.
gnark1ll1us 3 months ago
@gnark1ll1us The fact that the Buran was non piloted is not special you dumbass. It is in fact a sign of inferiority. The Space Shuttle has complex life support systems. Manned flight also shows a confidence of design. The Buran was just a pathetic attempt by the Soviets to try and prove that they still had it together. Putting men in space is many orders of magnitude more expensive and complicated than a non piloted craft. Most rockets even today are still unmanned.
njdevil281 3 months ago
@gnark1ll1us
"Buran was test flown into orbit on several occasions without crew"
Correction: Buran was flown once. It wasn't a huge accomplishment that it was unmanned. Earlier USSR and USA spacecraft had flown unmanned missions prior to being crewed, although the Space Shuttle was not one of them. Future versions of the Buran would have had life support systems for crewed missions.
Also, if you're looking for US firsts: orbital rendezvous; orbital docking; high orbit; long duration.
specieszero 3 months ago
@gnark1ll1us You are a god in your own right. Rock on man.
xXDEICIDE216Xx 3 months ago
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAX!!! They should have used noclip :c
Dubbuhya 6 months ago
It seems the Soviet cameras were the same quality as their rockets.
Kauwhaka 6 months ago
It's too late to cancel the launch! Mason, blow the rocket!
CriminalMacabre 6 months ago
Would have beat us to the moon what a shame. The competition would have made us both try harder and benefit both of us.
poultonb 6 months ago
is it possible to keep a technical discussion on this forum rather than having comments ..a la. RUSHLIMBAUGH?
Virgocygni56 6 months ago
If it must fail, let it fail magnificently.
supressorgrid 6 months ago
To the goulag you failures.
cybermarsactual 6 months ago 14
@cybermarsactual durak!
digimaks 3 months ago
Cool dickwaving contest everyone
fyadcorp 6 months ago
When in doubt, use more rocket nozzles.
Si13ntGriff 6 months ago
That's what I call a hunk of machinery.
isuckaman 6 months ago
@MP312C On the contrary, the NK-33 rocket engine is the highest performance rocket engine ever created. When it was discovered in the 1990s that there was still a stockpile of them in storage in Russia, the Americans couldn't wait to get their hands on them as they had nothing comparable.
Mechness 6 months ago
@Mechness ...actually, the Rocketdyne F-1 was the most powerful single-barrel rocket engine ever built, at 1.5 million lbf (6.77MN) thrust, about four times as much as the NK-33. (RD-180 is more powerful, but is a four-chamber design.) NK-33, however, is the most *efficient* kerosene/oxygen rocket ever built (highest specific impulse, highest thrust-to-weight); even so, the N1 used the earlier, less-efficient NK-15 engine instead.
rdfox76 6 months ago
@rdfox76 Though I understand that the NK-33 was designed as part of the N-1 program, even if it never made it onto a rocket. The Russian program was started well after Saturn V, comparatively underfunded, and cancelled after these launch failures, but it wasn't the rocket engines that let them down it was the failure of the control systems to recover correctly from problems as it was designed to do.
Their rocket engines are still good, but soviet electronics and computers sucked bigtime.
Mechness 6 months ago
@MP312C Yeah right, because rocket launches are really easy to do in secret! Hahahaha!
Mechness 6 months ago
Looks like a bunch of americans commented just to bring Russians and fans of Russian aerospace down...just because they wost their wittle shuttle...AWWWWW *pout*. With friends like these, who needs, erm, terrorists. Anyway, it's a shame about this rocket, huge, beautiful.
maugustyniak 6 months ago
Huge explosion is what caused me to watch this
BlakMastachief 7 months ago
haha rocket go boom
STRIDERT17 7 months ago
Comment removed
sebstar78 7 months ago
чую, рабоче-крестянскими коментами здесь пахнет...
kalmius7 7 months ago
You cut out the part where it exploded.
njdevil281 8 months ago
@MP312C like what exactly?
JuicYouS 8 months ago
@ 1chemodan: You're right. 75% of the tech on the ISS was created by taking out the trash and delivering the groceries (Russia's contribution). Russia is the desperate housewife of the modern space race; get over it. The US doesn't even have competition anymore or we would have been on Mars five years ago.
ryanw430 8 months ago
in Soviet Russia rocket go BOOM...
NAKOR007 8 months ago
NK-33 engines using till this day! And Americansa buying it =)) Soviet space programm the best
Fantomas24ARM 8 months ago
I am an American, one thing i think the Russians created gorgeous machines, pure brute mechanical engineering beauty. Theirs a reason why they have continued to use the same rocket for 45 years compaired to our retarded NASA program that spend billions of dollars every year and dont stick with one launch medium. ever hear of the term KISS?
TheIndustrialphreak 8 months ago 13
@TheIndustrialphreak It's funny when someone is calling someone else stupid, and in doing so writes the word "Theirs" instead of "There's" (among your other stupid mistakes). HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Insult FAIL!!
mushtang2 4 months ago
@TheIndustrialphreak keep it simple student?
ianmansfieldtv 4 months ago
@TheIndustrialphreak i am also an American.
1. learn how to spell.
2. if you have a problem with America then leave.
3. DON'T YOU DARE TALK SHIT ABOUT THE U.S.A.
fkagiantfish 3 months ago
@fkagiantfish common fuckers, everybody says anything he likes about us, russia, uk, hitler, big bang, supernovae, god or any other shit. This is youtube not congress.
And what kind of dick did america put in your ass to make you back it so strong?
robin100012001 3 months ago
@robin100012001 so, it says a whole fucking lot when you are supporting praise for hitler and comments against god. i can speak for every non prejudice American when i say WE DON'T WANT YOU IN OUR COUNTRY! YOU GONNA BE THIS IGNORANT THEN YOU CAN JUST LEAVE!
fkagiantfish 3 months ago
@TheIndustrialphreak Agreed. From the AK to the Avtovaz, Russia like it simple. Then communism :(
1230986666 3 months ago
Nice rocket, it just had too many engines. Too many points of failure. Even the Saturn only had 5 engines and on some missions they lost an engine in flight.
rickcain2320 9 months ago
zoom in, zoom out, zoom in and zoom out :-|
cs512tr 9 months ago
Soviet/Russian rocket technology was cutting-edge at this time. Still make good rockets/engines! It's just the uninspired-looking spacecraft designs that I don't like. The Russian spacecraft have always looked as ugly as a box of hammers, in my opinion. And it's about time Russia makes a new spacecraft...I know Soyuz "works," but after 45 years, you'd think they could make a newer, better design.
mlovmo 9 months ago
@mlovmo dude, most things today, are based on last century stuff... innovation! thats what happened, and there are new designs, the proton M rocket is fairly new
iam1and1isme 9 months ago
Like a good neighbor, state farm is there!
cookiemodern23 9 months ago
awesome bad picture material
yzorg 9 months ago
This is the second test of the N1, designated N1-5L. A bolt got sucked into a fuel pump, which made the engine blow up. The onboard computer, rather than compensate by turning off just the engine across from it, shut down all 29 remaining engines. The rocket fell back on the pad, completely destroying it in the biggest rocket explosion in the Space Race.
peyre1347 10 months ago
what is the name of the song ?
guiguidu11380 10 months ago
I like your vid. you need fre*e editing softw*are like vdow*nloader, nhc toolb*ox and things like that. sorry about the *****, gets flagged as spam.
breaneainn 10 months ago
Amazing how many sheeple are bleating out how bad Soviet technology supposedly was. They've clearly never seen how many attempts it took for the US space program to get its own moon shot going.
Apollo 1 burned, killing all three astronauts inside. The prototype for the lunar module crashed, nearly killing the test pilot. Not to mention the dozens of unmanned test shots in the 50s and early 60s that blew up on the launch pad.
That's how rocket science is, folks.
Threetails 10 months ago
Mars rocket
Doniak2 10 months ago
Why do you idiots always turn any comment section on the internet into stupid fight
mouser485 10 months ago 3
this was my rocket motherfuckers...
kureselisinis 10 months ago
In 80's modified engines of N-1 rocket, that was ready to launch in 1974, were tested on 250 site of " Buran " project , that utilised many buildings of Lunar N-1 program, including both launching pads (110, 250). They burn out perfect, the same perfect was the only unmanned flight of Buran spaceship in 80's. Both programmes consumed 20 billions $, were reply to US " Apollo" and " Shuttle" programmes, but contrary resulted only in museum exposure of products. USSR was gone and technology sold.
nyckhusan 10 months ago
Vid is so poor I couldn't tell what the hell I was looking at!
glumpy10 10 months ago
GOING...GOING...gone
theyearofourlordig88 10 months ago
Communism sent us to space.
Superchickenman159 10 months ago
FAIL
theyellow240z 10 months ago
the problem with this rocket was that they build it in a hurry to beat the apollo program but it had a lot of technical errors such as poor engineering and the inability to make 15 rocket engines work together at the same time
kbt3s9 10 months ago
@kbt3s9 you're a dreamer, the technology tested here has been used to build the most reliable rockets in human history, the principle was so revolutionary that the science behind the issues associated with the concept was stil unknown. Within a few years the problems were solved mathematically and applied to the next generation of heavy lift launchers.
eMPCreators 10 months ago 32
@eMPCreators You can never say the N1 was in any stretch of the imagination a good rocket. The plumbing was overly complex (as it should be for 30 main engines). Transportation by train hurt the rocket with vibration. Kerosene in every stage. Very poor design.
tlages 8 months ago 2
@kbt3s9-15 rocket engines? Try doubling that number. It used 30 engines.
dalek14mc 10 months ago
@Briankey1960 especially at home depot next to Gulgate shopping plaza.
overkill2010 11 months ago
@Briankey1960 10 million Mexicans cant be wrong.
overkill2010 11 months ago
nope, i guess it didn't blend.
burn19ballz 11 months ago
mood race should have been a draw, so everyone will spend military money on mars shot
4d616c65737469636b 11 months ago
haha Russian Engineering……
BassGuitarGuy128 11 months ago
@BassGuitarGuy128 Yea.. first satellite in Space, first animal in Space, first human in Space, first Space Station, first to start building ISS... So what exactly you're laughing about ?
Makrozon 11 months ago
@Makrozon what you tlaking about first to start building ISS
bandbigred 11 months ago
@bandbigred Russia delivered the first ISS module [Zarya] in 1998.
Makrozon 11 months ago
@Makrozon Russia also killed the first animals in space, the first person in LEO, the first and only people in space, they may have achieved a lot of firsts, but it was at a very high cost. They cut corners to be first and didn't care who died.
locopyro13 11 months ago
@Makrozon
Key word "first." That's all the Russians focused on. They cared very little about safety and did everything half-assed. The Americans, though they worked hard to be first, still kept safety in mind. Lastly, the Russians were first only by a couple of months for these feats, which is not an acceptable way to gauge which country had the better technologies. Being first means very little. Last but not least, the United States was able to execute 6 successful missions to the moon.
BassGuy128 11 months ago
@BassGuy128 That`s why Russia have no "bad" manned missions something like 25 years...
P.S. 75% of space tech from Russia. Pindosiya (US) use it in silence.
1chemodan 10 months ago 18
@1chemodan-Russia hasn't had a bad mission because they haven't had any manned mission. They just resort to using shitty unmanned missions.
dalek14mc 9 months ago
@dalek14mc Hmmm. Can't tell if you're a troll, or just really stupid...
PootleMoonpig 9 months ago 3
@PootleMoonpig-Spoken like a typical european, you blame anyone who is against as being a troll.
dalek14mc 9 months ago
@dalek14mc Oh, you're just stupid. That's ok then.
PootleMoonpig 9 months ago 2
@PootleMoonpig-Truly, you're just another arrogant european, it's funny how your snooty ego causes you to post nothing but insults after you have been refuted. Good day. :)
dalek14mc 9 months ago
@dalek14mc I don't use insults you cock smoker.
PootleMoonpig 9 months ago
@PootleMoonpig-I should say the same for you. Have a nice day!!!
dalek14mc 9 months ago
@dalek14mc We (europeans) understood, that`s you from US. Sadly, but your opinion is normal for americana kid.
1chemodan 9 months ago
@1chemodan-Seriously, look at your comment. I love how you claim to know better than me, yet you're just borderline illiterate.
dalek14mc 9 months ago
@1chemodan THE SOVIETS MADE AN EXPLODING LUNAR ROCKET
NAMED N-1. THERE WAS MANY (30) ENGINES, THERES
MORE THAN U.S.A CAN ALLOW (15) TO PREVENT EXPLOSION.
stellaruniversexmpls 7 months ago
@BassGuy128 how can you argue if you dont know shit? watch space race made by americans or britains not sure and get informed that when russians went to space you finaly used german scientist to make a rocket. the funny thing is 80% of americans think they won the race.
hellagesoon 9 months ago
@hellagesoon What date was the Soviet moon landing again?
zoodensha 9 months ago
@zoodensha - SOVIETS first landed on the moon, placed a satellite there, in 1959. In 1970 they landed a rover, collected samples and returned them to earth....Take caution when you belittle competitors, arrogance will fail you.
MrSladeTheBlade 8 months ago
@Makrozon And now the USSR sits smoldering on the trash heap of history.
overkill2010 11 months ago
Idiot, last I noticed the wonderful US had retired its entire space shutte fleet because it was unsafe to fly and has no way to get men into orbit any longer..... Anyway, the US only made it to the moon thanks to the collaboration with known nazi scientist mass murderers with hands dripping with human blood. Kennedy was an idiot too, druggy, immoral deceitful serial shagger and warmonger. But Americans love a pretty boy don't they.
eMPCreators 10 months ago
@eMPCreators So what your saying is your leaders pussied out to an idiot during the Cuban missile crisis? Well no wonder the USSR has been dead for twenty years now and Russia is nothing but a taxi service to the waste of money ISS. America has invented so many things that changed the world like the light bulb, airplane, telephone, television, internet, GPS and on and on. Russia is a complete non-factor in todays world. America is wary of the Chinese, No one gives shit about Russia fucktard.
overkill2010 10 months ago
@overkill2010 America have use russian scientist for many invention ... TV its russian invention ..
Alexei55555 10 months ago
@Alexei55555 The TV doesnt have any 1 inventor. It was several people that came up with the tech that eventually evolved into the TV. If you wanted to give credit, you'd have to credit a russian an american and an englishman. BBC was the first to broadcast publicTV signals, an american was responsible for making it fully electronic(no moving parts) and then an englishman was also responsible for bringing in "color"
mouser485 10 months ago
@mouser485 You forgot...and a Serb invented the Remote :)
DriveByInAYugo 10 months ago
@Alexei55555-That's a typical russian thing to say. Did your lying propaganda country tell you that?
Russia had nothing to do with the invention of the TV. The first concepts and final design came out of western europe.
dalek14mc 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dalek14mc That's a typical american thing to say
Alexei55555 10 months ago