The evo fucking hit a cone lmao, did they even dock points off? Guess not, but these drivers are horrible, the GTR would hands down win in cornering. I'm not sure if the guy even knew the car had Race Mode and Launch control. The GTR may be twice the price, but you get twice the car.
pss don't get me wrong I'm a Evo Guy but no matter what when both cars are stock the gtr is better than the Evo in ALL aspect including in. curves so that dude in the gtr SUCK driving
Its a very cool camera and editing trick, so you cant use 2 different drivers as an excuse lol. Each car has their pros and cons, but even being an EVO nut, I'll take the GT-R over the EVO X anyday :)
@HMNGfist thats stupid questiong, then why not use the price difference btw the gtr and evo x to mod the evo x, see who runs better with same amount of money that use on both cars.
@tarmacblack1 Ofcourse there are cars even faster than an alpha12 :) ariel atom for ex.. evo is a impressive car but i just dont like it well it depends on your pleasure
Well, if they didn't mock GT-R at the beginning, i think i'll believe in them. Thought Evo became Track Car Of The Year 2009. It doesn't mean it can be classed with super car. We can see it from the name itself "GT-R", it 's one of many classes for super car. So the producers of Evo, doesn't mean to make Evo into super car. And, if i'm not mistaken Mitsubishi had tried to make super car, but failed. Oh yeah lastly, Track car = Rally & Super car = F1 & 24 hours Le Mans etc.
I hope Mitsubishi will come to their sence,stay away from foney-eco-bullshit and continue to make EVO's.I can't stand that MIEV toaster,and it's only gonna get worse by time.
Don't get me wrong,I support ecology,but not hypocrisy.I mean,I'm listening,all the time those idiotic "cars are bad,they burn oxygen",and yet,above my head,are flying two 737's,each with 4 engines that burn tones of fuel and air just in a minute.And no one talks about that,just about cars.That's just hypocrisy,bullshit.
Did he just call the GTR a Japanese rice rocket? What an asshole. The GTR has earned the right to be called a supercar. Even if you hate the GTR, if you have any knowledge and respect for cars you have to recognize its greatness.
I'm not trying to troll here but top gear has better comparisons because some of these test don't prove anything(especially with two different drivers).
im srry honest comment but BULL SHIT the GTR better looking faster and more grip around the corners the only advantage the EVO X is that its a 4 door vehicle but if i had the choice take the GTR and once u get bored u sell it and by 5 EVO X's
@MegaLildude123 the evo x fq 400 is the best track car of 2010 and will kick the gtr's butt around a track and the fq 400 is 87k more than the gtr and i will say better.
Because the Evo passed the GTR in the 0-100-0 race, doesn't mean its braking was not as good. If it is slower-100 then it will cover more tarmac getting there, therefore cover more total distance. Jesus, these people are fucking dumb. Im not saying the Evo is better at braking, probably not, but they assumed with no data to prove it.Dummies.
@ODIEMCL I'd say go to price, I dream of owning a gtr especially the 2012, but take the base prices the evo is half the price and it's a big half with 40k-50k left to spend towards an evo I think the gtr can't touch it. Also if I put even 10k into an evo I would spank any gtr, and any point after that you would question why would I spend that money on a gtr besides looks, name, and heritage, the evo demolishes it. But I would still give my left nut for a 2012 gtr why? Idk.
GTR has a much larger price than the EVO, and since we know what evo is capable off with suck specs and a lower price i would personaly choose the EVO..plus i think it looks a lot better
8cyl 6cyl and 4cyl should not be compared, if mitsubishi made a v6 turbo like the GTR i bet it would kick the pants off of most cars if not all cars, with that being said they shouldnt compare a 8 6 or 4cyl cars at all they should pick on the thing there own size.
In real life driving, I'm confident that the GTR has a better low down torque due to larger displacement. Does this EvoX FQ400 have a same turbo lag like the older EvoVIII FQ400?
Turbo lags can massively annoy drivers especially in slow traffic. Even a N/A 1.6L Fiat station wagon has beaten an Evo8 FQ400 when both are on their top gears, rolling start from (so to say) 35MPH or 60 KPH. In this kind of comparison, the GTR will make mince meat even on sixth gear.
Well we can but by looking at the specs more closely. I'm confident the GTR has better low down torque over the modded FQ400 EvoX. With a big turbo in EvoX I'm sure there's big turbo lag like the EvoVIII FQ400. I maybe wrong but if you want so much power on such a small engine, surely there's price to pay for that much power.
To make matters even worse, the FQ400 can stall very easily unless you're the man of that or if it has a dual clutch gearbox.
@godzillat6 yep without a turbo a base engine of Evo VIII (4g63) by data I have on my desk produced only 178Nm of Torque. Thats why turbo plays a huge role in evo. (off-topic note: EVOX FQ400 model is currently car with best torque per liter ratio in the world)
I am a fan of Mitsubishi and I am employed in Mitsubishi parts store :), and to me both cars are great, I just don't like them being compared.
This test is interesting but obviously a promotion for the FQ400. The FQ400 is a great car but having owned both cars (just the EVO not the FQ400) both cars with mild mods the GTR will destroy the EVO X. The EVO X will need some pretty serious mods + race gas just to keep up with the GTR bumping up its boost on pump gas. Now in my opinion the EVO X drives better and feels more connected with the road than the GTR (the GTR just drives 'smart' for whatever that is worth) but come on...
@daffyvader i said v6 retard.. i was watching a video with the gtr racing a lexus LFA which has a supercharged v10 i corrected myself in the comments if you would have looked
G Test... 1.6...? haha you must be joking, Nissan GTR spec v can only pull 1.12, ZR1: 1.06. And then the breaking part, if the GTR get to 100 quick then obv it will start breaking before the Evo so it wasn't accurate, therefore doesnt necessary mean that it stops quicker. GTR 0-62.1 is quicker then why should the evo had a head start at the first 3-4 seconds? driver's problem with the GTR, launch control set up and reaction time maybe?
He only used the term "rice rockets" because the British will never be able to make a car that could compete on a international level like the GT-R or Evo.
@12389h lol um all fq's are from uk idiot, straight from japan to uk with no engine or major performance parts only the gadgets and wheels n stuff like that... then assembled by hks uk with hks engine and the rest
@13TheRoom13 What are you talking about? The FQ engines are all Japanese engines just tuned in the UK. Also HKS is a Japanese company. I'm talking about British "sports" cars: Aston Martins, Jaguar etc. They're all failed companies, Japanese and German 4 door saloons smoke the best UK has to offer.
For the people always say rice rockets this rice rockets that whenever they get the chance. I don't care what you call it as long as you know it will leave you in the dust.
@fuckingkidsthesedays They use different drivers for most of the testing, but the final test is always done by the stig. and besides top gear is a show for entertainment, not to be taken too seriously.
Evo=1 less turbo Evo=2 less cylinders Evo=$22,000 less. Evo is the real winner, Nissan is a mad noob when it comes to AWD Turbo, Mitsubishi has been doing it right for more than 20 years.
@b4igetu no hes saying that asian drivers, specifically japanese people can usually get the best from a car because japanese people are the most skilled
@LolAtRice Yeah I see what you're saying, but surely G force in turns is related more to the grip generated from the tyres and suspension? A Lotus Exige for instance, will pull higher G in corners than say, a Dodge Viper, even though the Lotus is a slower car in a straight line. The guy in the video seems to be equating straightline speed, with inertial grip.
That is all I hear, The Lancer is Simple its meant to be a driving enthusiasts car, People who enjoy just the feel and drive and want a car that is going to do what its told, The GT-R does that but at a risk of breaking your neck.
Also RiceRockets are meant for bikes, Ricer cars are meant for kids who soup up jap cars with silly little bf
@RFID666 G is the force of acceleration relative to free fall in gravity, where the vector sum of any force other than gravity experienced by an object (like the driver in car) is measured. G force is not the "ability to turn", but heavier objects tend to resist the cornering force (since the force will try to continue straight), and higher G is experienced by the driver. So lower the ability of car to corner, the higher the G :-)
No I realize G-force has nothing to do with a car's 'ability' to turn. Higher grip from tyres, low mass, and well setup suspension will increase the amount of G you can pull while cornering. The top speed of a car is not related to that, and neither is the mass.
"So lower the ability of car to corner, the higher the G" So weld the steering rack and you will pull more G? Erm no.
Dude, you're talking to a physics masters student lol Try studying a little harder on physics next time you want to post something as stupid as "bullet corners better than a gokart".
@rubik00 Why the attitude? Have I been rude to you? No. I was being sarcastic with the 'bullet' comment. I will explain again, because you seem to be a bit 'special' (especially for a "physics masters student lol")
The Guy in the video introduces the GTR to the G test by saying: 'the 193mph top speed should give it the edge" My point was, that top speed has NOTHING to do with cornering G. Maybe you should read things more carefully, as you look slightly stupid now.
The evo fucking hit a cone lmao, did they even dock points off? Guess not, but these drivers are horrible, the GTR would hands down win in cornering. I'm not sure if the guy even knew the car had Race Mode and Launch control. The GTR may be twice the price, but you get twice the car.
DonaldHellsing 1 day ago
rice rockets... -_-. If these are rice rockets what are their version of hyper cars... a fucking eurofighter?
Sleepinglion22 1 day ago
ill take the evo
ipoptouch 1 week ago
I want this video on my 8600 Luna phone.
georgepotter428 1 week ago
Japanese Rice Rockets
spitfire0013 1 week ago
Its good that they said nothing about the GTR costing about twice as much as the EVO.
DarkestFlame 1 week ago
gtr is ugly
jonaske13 1 week ago
pss don't get me wrong I'm a Evo Guy but no matter what when both cars are stock the gtr is better than the Evo in ALL aspect including in. curves so that dude in the gtr SUCK driving
sgtwar777 1 week ago
i feel like they tried to favor the gtr :/
06evo9mrFTW 2 weeks ago
Who taught them how to drive ??????? Dicks
you90nis 2 weeks ago
WTF did he just say rice rockets
povaj 1 month ago 3
Have you considered driver error as you have two dumbass' driving
kaczka81 1 month ago 9
@kaczka81 - Its the same guy driving both cars!
Its a very cool camera and editing trick, so you cant use 2 different drivers as an excuse lol. Each car has their pros and cons, but even being an EVO nut, I'll take the GT-R over the EVO X anyday :)
MYDODGEYUTUBENAME 1 month ago
are kiddin' me !?
micheal3041993 1 month ago
Ok, but now try this STUPID ''test'' with the ALPHA-12 gtr by AMS you can find it on youtube...now make a vid, im waiting that.
kuikoman 1 month ago
40000$ vs 100000$ WTF?)
sanchoz8 1 month ago
GTR is better and faster, but EVO is quicker.
evover320 1 month ago
All i see is an evo fanboy trying to prove that evo is faster.
Using idiot tests :)
Try them 0-400m and say goodbye evo.
Omg i cant believe you actually compare gtr with evo
mAchMucHA 1 month ago
todos prefieren un evo a un gt-r y sus pruebas estan hechas mal son unos giles los conductores
artyse 1 month ago
These tests are fucking retarded.
PHIstayGUTTA 1 month ago
is not the cars is the driver in this case
cristoDZ1 2 months ago
the gtr cost twice than evo
dfpdxxl 2 months ago
i hope mitsu brings back 3000gt vr-4.....
mitsuevo8mr 2 months ago
use a evo 9 fq-400 instead , the gtr end with the r34 skyline, the new gtr sux, evo for life...........
mitsuevo8mr 2 months ago
So you put a top of the line evo x against a regular gtr?? That does no justice, why not against the spec v or spec r...
HMNGfist 2 months ago
@HMNGfist thats stupid questiong, then why not use the price difference btw the gtr and evo x to mod the evo x, see who runs better with same amount of money that use on both cars.
ganninia 2 months ago
對此影片做出回應... *question
ganninia 2 months ago
The new gtr looks ugly......
HappyGuitarFellow 2 months ago
GTR ALPHA 12 check this out and shut the fuck up evo fags
IbanezGio122 2 months ago
@IbanezGio122
The older lighter evo fq400 will smash the gtr ;) Older technology and it still wins...Alpha 12...yep fast but there are plenty of cars faster.
tarmacblack1 2 months ago
@tarmacblack1 Ofcourse there are cars even faster than an alpha12 :) ariel atom for ex.. evo is a impressive car but i just dont like it well it depends on your pleasure
IbanezGio122 2 months ago
Well, if they didn't mock GT-R at the beginning, i think i'll believe in them. Thought Evo became Track Car Of The Year 2009. It doesn't mean it can be classed with super car. We can see it from the name itself "GT-R", it 's one of many classes for super car. So the producers of Evo, doesn't mean to make Evo into super car. And, if i'm not mistaken Mitsubishi had tried to make super car, but failed. Oh yeah lastly, Track car = Rally & Super car = F1 & 24 hours Le Mans etc.
TheDarkVlame 2 months ago
Comment removed
TheDarkVlame 2 months ago
Comment removed
TheDarkVlame 2 months ago
I hope Mitsubishi will come to their sence,stay away from foney-eco-bullshit and continue to make EVO's.I can't stand that MIEV toaster,and it's only gonna get worse by time.
Don't get me wrong,I support ecology,but not hypocrisy.I mean,I'm listening,all the time those idiotic "cars are bad,they burn oxygen",and yet,above my head,are flying two 737's,each with 4 engines that burn tones of fuel and air just in a minute.And no one talks about that,just about cars.That's just hypocrisy,bullshit.
didi89s 3 months ago
amateur drivers
leifstorck 3 months ago
Ha 1:57 Evo fucked up with the cone! Time has to be deducted!
nukeurhouse12 3 months ago
Did he just call the GTR a Japanese rice rocket? What an asshole. The GTR has earned the right to be called a supercar. Even if you hate the GTR, if you have any knowledge and respect for cars you have to recognize its greatness.
MrTyronePimp 3 months ago
@ThePachCode and how the hell is that racist?
xxMikePortnoyJrxx 3 months ago
That evo is not something I want, its something I NEED to function in this world.
select899 3 months ago
Rice rockets? How many of you caught that little jist of racism? LOL love it
ThePachCode 3 months ago
RAGEEEEEEEE
r4id3r3r 3 months ago
Worst hosts ever.
screwloose455 3 months ago
guys looks like he got a stick up his ass too driving the evo hahaha gaylord
adam1111 3 months ago
yeah hahha they have no idea what they are talking about! LAMES!! GIVE ME THE EVO! haha
adam1111 3 months ago
Shut up hassan!!!!!
moneshmahtani 4 months ago
I'm not trying to troll here but top gear has better comparisons because some of these test don't prove anything(especially with two different drivers).
skbonesnte 4 months ago
They do NOT deserve to be driving these cars. I do :)
SuperMegaCliff 4 months ago 41
@SuperMegaCliff haahahahhaha ahaan
malik4288 4 months ago
@SuperMegaCliff They don't let retards drive their cars...
miami33158 2 months ago
this is like a test of common sense, the gtr is obviously faster than a evo
Brianbrainpwi 4 months ago
...
Brianbrainpwi 4 months ago
I've paused the vidoe before they start just to bet that the Evo wins! well i hope
BurgessGaming 4 months ago
how come we dont get all the different variants of the evo here in north america.? i dont think we get this FQ400 here
abelucious 4 months ago
@abelucious FQ 400 is just for Japan and UK :(
Mravak74 4 months ago
If you think evos better ur stupid
Youngboxer1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i'll believe what clarkson said when testing the GTR
felipe09vallejos85 4 months ago
i'll believe what clarkson said when testing the GTR
felipe09vallejos85 4 months ago
Ams evo pish posh lol alpha 12 gtr owns any evo
guambombkid 4 months ago
lol gtr coupe and evo sedan and price is very different evo much cheaper then the gtr
WOW4EVERBEST 4 months ago
try the evo 9 0r 8 mr fq-400 which does 0-60 in 3.5 sec same as the gtr, and let's see......plus there is no r35 that can match ams evos.........
mitsuevo8mr 4 months ago
did he just call a skyline, a rice rocket? Son of a B&^@%$
stickyr34 4 months ago
Rice rocket? Doh.... WTF is that "G" test supposed to be? These Tests sucks, so do the drivers....
FlipsGTS 4 months ago
Rice rocket? Doh....
FlipsGTS 4 months ago
What a stupid test... 155mph FQ400? It's limited you idiots...
a much better test: /watch?v=Dyw8qJ_9Vjc
Pete292323 4 months ago
what idiot that has the money to buy a GTR would buy the evo?
not me
uniman6699 4 months ago
I stopped watching when the douche turd nugget called a Nissan GTR and a EVO 10 "Rice Rockets" ...morons don't deserve to drive those beautiful cars
titusdrakemovies 4 months ago
my heart will still reach for the gtr just look at the price tag on both and you will have an easy decision gtr > all
DcEvoIX 4 months ago
Damn it really hurts to see so many ricers with no knowledge of physics.....
rubik00 5 months ago
im srry honest comment but BULL SHIT the GTR better looking faster and more grip around the corners the only advantage the EVO X is that its a 4 door vehicle but if i had the choice take the GTR and once u get bored u sell it and by 5 EVO X's
HACKERPRODUCT1ONS 5 months ago
my brother can run better slalom than this guy
W4TCH4W 5 months ago
I hope his mum knows hes out driving cars and not studying.
MrBigolnuts 5 months ago
aweaome. video and comparassion
del787b 5 months ago
TOP GEAR
playa220022 5 months ago
This is stupid because the two cars are different classes... and the size specifications make a huge difference.
fahadtennis86 5 months ago
isnt the fq400 a tuned version of the evo 10?
chungmushi 5 months ago
EVO!!!
vaitheezlanka 5 months ago
stupid tests for a comparrison.
NiCkOhOdGiE88 5 months ago
The evo may be,as they said worse,but the evo is half the price!
MegaLildude123 5 months ago
@MegaLildude123 the evo x fq 400 is the best track car of 2010 and will kick the gtr's butt around a track and the fq 400 is 87k more than the gtr and i will say better.
lalaevo 5 months ago
Because the Evo passed the GTR in the 0-100-0 race, doesn't mean its braking was not as good. If it is slower-100 then it will cover more tarmac getting there, therefore cover more total distance. Jesus, these people are fucking dumb. Im not saying the Evo is better at braking, probably not, but they assumed with no data to prove it.Dummies.
ODIEMCL 5 months ago 38
@ODIEMCL I'd say go to price, I dream of owning a gtr especially the 2012, but take the base prices the evo is half the price and it's a big half with 40k-50k left to spend towards an evo I think the gtr can't touch it. Also if I put even 10k into an evo I would spank any gtr, and any point after that you would question why would I spend that money on a gtr besides looks, name, and heritage, the evo demolishes it. But I would still give my left nut for a 2012 gtr why? Idk.
DcEvoIX 1 month ago
Nice shirt mike you are an idiot haha
ErikDubStepOC 5 months ago
oh yea evos werent really made for racing they were made for rallying
dlochin 6 months ago
@dlochin rallying is racing, dumbass!!
cammedevo8 5 months ago
GTR has a much larger price than the EVO, and since we know what evo is capable off with suck specs and a lower price i would personaly choose the EVO..plus i think it looks a lot better
tonin4o 6 months ago
slalom needs to get run a few times, Evo tipped a cone.
Blessedtouch 6 months ago
@Blessedtouch I noticied that too. Its at 1:57
Clarkify24 5 months ago
@rahal23 joke or not it shows bias. Racism is funny you cracker ass honky.
Thesoulpills 6 months ago
That handling test was just stupid -.-
92xico92 6 months ago
Get some proper drivers, not this pair of cunts!!!
camer81 6 months ago
"Rice rockets" ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?!?!
RiggsOutdoors 6 months ago
Omfg...2 different categories...2 different cars...what they try to compare?? if they want an equal fight they could have impreza vs evo...
sakhsdragunof 6 months ago
isn't the evo x much cheaper then the gtr ?
Allardio 6 months ago
@Allardio Yeah about $40k cheaper
sw4mp3rt 6 months ago
@sw4mp3rt lol fair test omg, everyone has 40k on his bank ...
Allardio 6 months ago
@Allardio Waaayyyy cheaper.
TheTexasTurbine 6 months ago
8cyl 6cyl and 4cyl should not be compared, if mitsubishi made a v6 turbo like the GTR i bet it would kick the pants off of most cars if not all cars, with that being said they shouldnt compare a 8 6 or 4cyl cars at all they should pick on the thing there own size.
Thisismine44441 6 months ago
@Thisismine44441 So you shouldn't compare a Lamborghini Gallardo with a Ferrari f430?! or a BMW M3 (E46 model) with an Audi RS4?
wardog08rules 6 months ago
@Thisismine44441 They used to, 3000gt Vr4, it was an awesome car and I can't wait for a replacement!
Lukeisonutube 4 months ago
EVO FTW!!!!!
RaggaDnB 6 months ago
ass clowns cannot drive :-/
R00567 6 months ago
Why didn't they put them around a racetrack? Loved the nitrogen filled tires comment... The FQ probably missed that detail.
dimebag745 6 months ago
In real life driving, I'm confident that the GTR has a better low down torque due to larger displacement. Does this EvoX FQ400 have a same turbo lag like the older EvoVIII FQ400?
Turbo lags can massively annoy drivers especially in slow traffic. Even a N/A 1.6L Fiat station wagon has beaten an Evo8 FQ400 when both are on their top gears, rolling start from (so to say) 35MPH or 60 KPH. In this kind of comparison, the GTR will make mince meat even on sixth gear.
godzillat6 6 months ago
3.8l V6 vs 2.0l V4. Sportscar vs rally saloon.470-500hp vs 400. Why do people compare them, its not natural.
MrPecony 7 months ago
@MrPecony
Well we can but by looking at the specs more closely. I'm confident the GTR has better low down torque over the modded FQ400 EvoX. With a big turbo in EvoX I'm sure there's big turbo lag like the EvoVIII FQ400. I maybe wrong but if you want so much power on such a small engine, surely there's price to pay for that much power.
To make matters even worse, the FQ400 can stall very easily unless you're the man of that or if it has a dual clutch gearbox.
godzillat6 6 months ago
@godzillat6 yep without a turbo a base engine of Evo VIII (4g63) by data I have on my desk produced only 178Nm of Torque. Thats why turbo plays a huge role in evo. (off-topic note: EVOX FQ400 model is currently car with best torque per liter ratio in the world)
I am a fan of Mitsubishi and I am employed in Mitsubishi parts store :), and to me both cars are great, I just don't like them being compared.
MrPecony 6 months ago
This test is interesting but obviously a promotion for the FQ400. The FQ400 is a great car but having owned both cars (just the EVO not the FQ400) both cars with mild mods the GTR will destroy the EVO X. The EVO X will need some pretty serious mods + race gas just to keep up with the GTR bumping up its boost on pump gas. Now in my opinion the EVO X drives better and feels more connected with the road than the GTR (the GTR just drives 'smart' for whatever that is worth) but come on...
ghuang429 7 months ago
test was stupid but the words at the end did make sense
whatever04811 7 months ago
v6 vs. 4cyl? what a waste!
in terms of speed GTR will win, but in handling no doubts FQ will win.
a "super car" vs. a "rally bred car" it's totally a mismatch.
i was thinking if the discontinued GTO's/3000GT of mitsubishi can withstand a GTR?
but for me, fq still looks a lot better than gtr. it's just me.
jonsalcedo24 7 months ago
Everyone look up "gtr alpha 9" and prepare to be blown away. If that doesn't tickle your fancy try "gtr alpha 12."
07buicklucerne 7 months ago
gtr is superior overall, but il stick to me EVO :D
EvoDude26 7 months ago
lets see nissan gt-r rapes mustang super snake? lol whose the dumbass who thinks the nissan v10 TT engine is ricey?!?!
ZackPorter2010 7 months ago
@ZackPorter2010 v6***
ZackPorter2010 7 months ago
@ZackPorter2010 whos the dumbass who thinks the gtr has a V10?
daffyvader 7 months ago
@daffyvader i said v6 retard.. i was watching a video with the gtr racing a lexus LFA which has a supercharged v10 i corrected myself in the comments if you would have looked
ZackPorter2010 7 months ago
Evos better for the price, and obvicely the get is faster it's twin turbo 3.8 6 cylinders bs 2.0 4 cylinders and only 1 turbo
IIxSaVaGeIx 7 months ago
Evo wins again!!! Dragi Sveti Nikola, ove sam godine bio jako dobar......
ikunovic 7 months ago
you guys are gay ass fags
9huyna1 7 months ago
Evo easily wins.
It's only got a 2lt engine...
the GT-R has a 3.8.
No wonder it's quicker to 100.
Would still have the Evo it's nicer!
Ataylor0 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EVO X is one of the meanest machines out-there.
3ndborn2 7 months ago
Evo X is one of the meanest machines out-there.
3ndborn2 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
G Test... 1.6...? haha you must be joking, Nissan GTR spec v can only pull 1.12, ZR1: 1.06. And then the breaking part, if the GTR get to 100 quick then obv it will start breaking before the Evo so it wasn't accurate, therefore doesnt necessary mean that it stops quicker. GTR 0-62.1 is quicker then why should the evo had a head start at the first 3-4 seconds? driver's problem with the GTR, launch control set up and reaction time maybe?
kenifchung 7 months ago
Comment removed
kenifchung 7 months ago in playlist cars
He only used the term "rice rockets" because the British will never be able to make a car that could compete on a international level like the GT-R or Evo.
12389h 7 months ago
@12389h lol um all fq's are from uk idiot, straight from japan to uk with no engine or major performance parts only the gadgets and wheels n stuff like that... then assembled by hks uk with hks engine and the rest
13TheRoom13 7 months ago
@13TheRoom13 What are you talking about? The FQ engines are all Japanese engines just tuned in the UK. Also HKS is a Japanese company. I'm talking about British "sports" cars: Aston Martins, Jaguar etc. They're all failed companies, Japanese and German 4 door saloons smoke the best UK has to offer.
12389h 7 months ago
For the people always say rice rockets this rice rockets that whenever they get the chance. I don't care what you call it as long as you know it will leave you in the dust.
thlin 7 months ago
Evo is more better , but driver suxx
Kr3sToS 8 months ago
rice rocket.fuckin hate that term..asians are here to stay motherfuckers!
roborat91 8 months ago
i like gtr better
xllClouDllx 8 months ago
lol @ 24 music
RenegadeFury 8 months ago
Driver makes the car not these silly tests
dontbesoft 8 months ago
This comparison is stupid, they arent even using the same driver. Skill plays a huge part in testing
1337superboy 8 months ago 58
@1337superboy they do the same thing on top gear kid
fuckingkidsthesedays 4 months ago
@fuckingkidsthesedays They use different drivers for most of the testing, but the final test is always done by the stig. and besides top gear is a show for entertainment, not to be taken too seriously.
1337superboy 4 months ago
i prefer gt-r
Shortsanitis 8 months ago
Proper manual gear box is right. Give me 3 pedals, or give me death!
sephiroth1386 8 months ago
Evo=1 less turbo Evo=2 less cylinders Evo=$22,000 less. Evo is the real winner, Nissan is a mad noob when it comes to AWD Turbo, Mitsubishi has been doing it right for more than 20 years.
flamingaxe791 8 months ago
Of course the GTR lost....YOU NEED AN ASIAN TO DRIVE AN ASIAN CAR!!! Lol :P
rahal23 8 months ago 44
@rahal23 duh what you make fun of the asian you motha faka, go fak yourself go fak fak fak fak yo motha
AznKid7373 8 months ago
@AznKid7373 True....Lol
rahal23 8 months ago
@rahal23 Mitsubishi motors is a Japanese brand too.
ARoundCube 8 months ago
@rahal23 aren't they both asian?
Aqlor 6 months ago
@Aqlor Yes but I was joking when I said that. And what I mean is that the driver isn't that much skilled at driving the GTR.
rahal23 6 months ago
@rahal23 Well if you need skill to drive a particular car I think that makes it worse.
b4igetu 6 months ago
@b4igetu no hes saying that asian drivers, specifically japanese people can usually get the best from a car because japanese people are the most skilled
Sasori327 5 months ago
@rahal23 racist much?
Thesoulpills 6 months ago
Comment removed
rahal23 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Thesoulpills lol it seems everybody here except you found my JOKE amusing.
rahal23 6 months ago
Comment removed
MrJawesome1 6 months ago
@rahal23 Both cars are Japanese .......
CronicRage 6 months ago
@rahal23 Mitsu is asian fyi...
Guizmo900 5 months ago
@rahal23 sod off
MrRunforyourlife 5 months ago
@rahal23 mitsubishi is asian too...so its still even
bryland7 4 months ago
Evo IX was faster than X.
MtKrybnik13 8 months ago
I used to own a evo 6 gsr an it was amazing to drive i can only imagine how good the evo x is, i drive a scooby now
TheChrisglasgow 8 months ago
this idiot cant drive!!!! evo faster? anything is faster than gtr when this asshole is driving
glocko100 8 months ago 3
I'd rather pay less than half the price for the Evo..
xXTEDXx 8 months ago
the fq400 is almost the same price as a gtr...
richardbau87 8 months ago
@LolAtRice Yeah I see what you're saying, but surely G force in turns is related more to the grip generated from the tyres and suspension? A Lotus Exige for instance, will pull higher G in corners than say, a Dodge Viper, even though the Lotus is a slower car in a straight line. The guy in the video seems to be equating straightline speed, with inertial grip.
RFID666 8 months ago
that guys voice is so grating after listening to jeremy clarksons soothing brogue
ftbtef 8 months ago
That is all I hear, The Lancer is Simple its meant to be a driving enthusiasts car, People who enjoy just the feel and drive and want a car that is going to do what its told, The GT-R does that but at a risk of breaking your neck.
Also RiceRockets are meant for bikes, Ricer cars are meant for kids who soup up jap cars with silly little bf
masterdirk101 8 months ago
Two badass car!
k3vinyAng 9 months ago
it wasnt the cars in this test, it was the drivers
bruceallmighty02 9 months ago
why this video is the only one on youtube that makes a comparison test of the FQ 400?
nigghtwalker 9 months ago
they left off the fact that the GT-R is double the price...
cocafan33 9 months ago
id still get an evo
Sasori327 9 months ago
Higher top speed = higher cornering G force?!? Right, so a bullet corners better than a gokart? Faggots
RFID666 9 months ago
@RFID666 G is the force of acceleration relative to free fall in gravity, where the vector sum of any force other than gravity experienced by an object (like the driver in car) is measured. G force is not the "ability to turn", but heavier objects tend to resist the cornering force (since the force will try to continue straight), and higher G is experienced by the driver. So lower the ability of car to corner, the higher the G :-)
rubik00 8 months ago
No I realize G-force has nothing to do with a car's 'ability' to turn. Higher grip from tyres, low mass, and well setup suspension will increase the amount of G you can pull while cornering. The top speed of a car is not related to that, and neither is the mass.
"So lower the ability of car to corner, the higher the G" So weld the steering rack and you will pull more G? Erm no.
RFID666 8 months ago
@RFID666
Dude, you're talking to a physics masters student lol Try studying a little harder on physics next time you want to post something as stupid as "bullet corners better than a gokart".
rubik00 5 months ago
@rubik00 Why the attitude? Have I been rude to you? No. I was being sarcastic with the 'bullet' comment. I will explain again, because you seem to be a bit 'special' (especially for a "physics masters student lol")
The Guy in the video introduces the GTR to the G test by saying: 'the 193mph top speed should give it the edge" My point was, that top speed has NOTHING to do with cornering G. Maybe you should read things more carefully, as you look slightly stupid now.
RFID666 5 months ago
how about the price?
shehhi89 9 months ago
yeah evos are great cars, i would love one but gtrs are better and i would love one even more! you cant beat japanese machines.
seanyroche 9 months ago
If not done by top gear, it's not scientific
Sin578 9 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
really? "rice rockets".... fucking wankers
Sin578 9 months ago
really "rice rockets".... fucking wankers
Sin578 9 months ago 2
I'd go with a GT-R
the evo is great but every ricer in my neighborhood has em so i h8 that shit
donsargent 9 months ago
gtr is better everybody with a smart brain knows that
MIAMISPORTCARS 9 months ago
EVO FTW .. I LOVE IT .. BEST CAR EVER BUILT !!!
gamesexperience123 9 months ago