Added: 2 years ago
From: hassan0098
Views: 660,436
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,069)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The evo fucking hit a cone lmao, did they even dock points off? Guess not, but these drivers are horrible, the GTR would hands down win in cornering. I'm not sure if the guy even knew the car had Race Mode and Launch control. The GTR may be twice the price, but you get twice the car.

  • rice rockets... -_-. If these are rice rockets what are their version of hyper cars... a fucking eurofighter?

  • ill take the evo

  • I want this video on my 8600 Luna phone.

  • Japanese Rice Rockets

  • Its good that they said nothing about the GTR costing about twice as much as the EVO.

  • gtr is ugly

    

  • pss don't get me wrong I'm a Evo Guy but no matter what when both cars are stock the gtr is better than the Evo in ALL aspect including in. curves so that dude in the gtr SUCK driving

  • i feel like they tried to favor the gtr :/

  • Who taught them how to drive ??????? Dicks

  • WTF did he just say rice rockets

  • Have you considered driver error as you have two dumbass' driving

  • @kaczka81 - Its the same guy driving both cars!

    Its a very cool camera and editing trick, so you cant use 2 different drivers as an excuse lol. Each car has their pros and cons, but even being an EVO nut, I'll take the GT-R over the EVO X anyday :)

  • are kiddin' me !?

  • Ok, but now try this STUPID ''test'' with the ALPHA-12 gtr by AMS you can find it on youtube...now make a vid, im waiting that.

  • 40000$ vs 100000$ WTF?)

  • GTR is better and faster, but EVO is quicker.

  • All i see is an evo fanboy trying to prove that evo is faster.

    Using idiot tests :)

    Try them 0-400m and say goodbye evo.

    Omg i cant believe you actually compare gtr with evo

  • todos prefieren un evo a un gt-r y sus pruebas estan hechas mal son unos giles los conductores

  • These tests are fucking retarded.

  • is not the cars is the driver in this case

  • the gtr cost twice than evo

  • i hope mitsu brings back 3000gt vr-4.....

  • use a evo 9 fq-400 instead , the gtr end with the r34 skyline, the new gtr sux, evo for life...........

  • So you put a top of the line evo x against a regular gtr?? That does no justice, why not against the spec v or spec r...

  • @HMNGfist thats stupid questiong, then why not use the price difference btw the gtr and evo x to mod the evo x, see who runs better with same amount of money that use on both cars.

  • 對此影片做出回應...  *question

  • The new gtr looks ugly......

  • GTR ALPHA 12 check this out and shut the fuck up evo fags

  • @IbanezGio122

    The older lighter evo fq400 will smash the gtr ;) Older technology and it still wins...Alpha 12...yep fast but there are plenty of cars faster.

  • @tarmacblack1 Ofcourse there are cars even faster than an alpha12 :) ariel atom for ex.. evo is a impressive car but i just dont like it well it depends on your  pleasure

  • Well, if they didn't mock GT-R at the beginning, i think i'll believe in them. Thought Evo became Track Car Of The Year 2009. It doesn't mean it can be classed with super car. We can see it from the name itself "GT-R", it 's one of many classes for super car. So the producers of Evo, doesn't mean to make Evo into super car. And, if i'm not mistaken Mitsubishi had tried to make super car, but failed. Oh yeah lastly, Track car = Rally & Super car = F1 & 24 hours Le Mans etc.

  • Comment removed

  • I hope Mitsubishi will come to their sence,stay away from foney-eco-bullshit and continue to make EVO's.I can't stand that MIEV toaster,and it's only gonna get worse by time.

    Don't get me wrong,I support ecology,but not hypocrisy.I mean,I'm listening,all the time those idiotic "cars are bad,they burn oxygen",and yet,above my head,are flying two 737's,each with 4 engines that burn tones of fuel and air just in a minute.And no one talks about that,just about cars.That's just hypocrisy,bullshit.

  • amateur drivers

    

  • Ha 1:57 Evo fucked up with the cone! Time has to be deducted!

  • Did he just call the GTR a Japanese rice rocket? What an asshole. The GTR has earned the right to be called a supercar. Even if you hate the GTR, if you have any knowledge and respect for cars you have to recognize its greatness.

  • @ThePachCode and how the hell is that racist?

  • That evo is not something I want, its something I NEED to function in this world.

  • Rice rockets? How many of you caught that little jist of racism? LOL love it

  • RAGEEEEEEEE

  • Worst hosts ever.

  • guys looks like he got a stick up his ass too driving the evo hahaha gaylord

  • yeah hahha they have no idea what they are talking about! LAMES!! GIVE ME THE EVO! haha

  • Shut up hassan!!!!!

  • I'm not trying to troll here but top gear has better comparisons because some of these test don't prove anything(especially with two different drivers).

  • They do NOT deserve to be driving these cars. I do :)

  • @SuperMegaCliff  haahahahhaha ahaan

  • @SuperMegaCliff They don't let retards drive their cars...

  • this is like a test of common sense, the gtr is obviously faster than a evo

  • ...

  • I've paused the vidoe before they start just to bet that the Evo wins! well i hope

  • how come we dont get all the different variants of the evo here in north america.? i dont think we get this FQ400 here

  • @abelucious FQ 400 is just for Japan and UK :(

  • If you think evos better ur stupid

  • i'll believe what clarkson said when testing the GTR

  • Ams evo pish posh lol alpha 12 gtr owns any evo

  • lol gtr coupe and evo sedan and price is very different evo much cheaper then the gtr

  • try the evo 9 0r 8 mr fq-400 which does 0-60 in 3.5 sec same as the gtr, and let's see......plus there is no r35 that can match ams evos.........

  • did he just call a skyline, a rice rocket? Son of a B&^@%$

  • Rice rocket? Doh.... WTF is that "G" test supposed to be? These Tests sucks, so do the drivers....

  • Rice rocket? Doh....

  • What a stupid test... 155mph FQ400? It's limited you idiots...

    a much better test: /watch?v=Dyw8qJ_9Vjc

  • what idiot that has the money to buy a GTR would buy the evo?

    not me

  • I stopped watching when the douche turd nugget called a Nissan GTR and a EVO 10 "Rice Rockets" ...morons don't deserve to drive those beautiful cars

  • my heart will still reach for the gtr just look at the price tag on both and you will have an easy decision gtr > all

  • Damn it really hurts to see so many ricers with no knowledge of physics.....

  • im srry honest comment but BULL SHIT the GTR better looking faster and more grip around the corners the only advantage the EVO X is that its a 4 door vehicle but if i had the choice take the GTR and once u get bored u sell it and by 5 EVO X's

  • my brother can run better slalom than this guy

  • I hope his mum knows hes out driving cars and not studying.

  • aweaome. video and comparassion

  • TOP GEAR

  • This is stupid because the two cars are different classes... and the size specifications make a huge difference.

  • isnt the fq400 a tuned version of the evo 10?

  • EVO!!!

    

  • stupid tests for a comparrison.

  • The evo may be,as they said worse,but the evo is half the price!

  • @MegaLildude123 the evo x fq 400 is the best track car of 2010 and will kick the gtr's butt around a track and the fq 400 is 87k more than the gtr and i will say better.

  • Because the Evo passed the GTR in the 0-100-0 race, doesn't mean its braking was not as good. If it is slower-100 then it will cover more tarmac getting there, therefore cover more total distance. Jesus, these people are fucking dumb. Im not saying the Evo is better at braking, probably not, but they assumed with no data to prove it.Dummies.

  • @ODIEMCL I'd say go to price, I dream of owning a gtr especially the 2012, but take the base prices the evo is half the price and it's a big half with 40k-50k left to spend towards an evo I think the gtr can't touch it. Also if I put even 10k into an evo I would spank any gtr, and any point after that you would question why would I spend that money on a gtr besides looks, name, and heritage, the evo demolishes it. But I would still give my left nut for a 2012 gtr why? Idk.

  • Nice shirt mike you are an idiot haha

  • oh yea evos werent really made for racing they were made for rallying

  • @dlochin rallying is racing, dumbass!!

  • GTR has a much larger price than the EVO, and since we know what evo is capable off with suck specs and a lower price i would personaly choose the EVO..plus i think it looks a lot better

  • slalom needs to get run a few times, Evo tipped a cone.

  • @Blessedtouch I noticied that too. Its at 1:57

  • @rahal23 joke or not it shows bias. Racism is funny you cracker ass honky.

  • That handling test was just stupid -.-

  • Get some proper drivers, not this pair of cunts!!!

  • "Rice rockets" ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?!?!

  • Omfg...2 different categories...2 different cars...what they try to compare?? if they want an equal fight they could have impreza vs evo...

  • isn't the evo x much cheaper then the gtr ?

  • @Allardio Yeah about $40k cheaper

  • @sw4mp3rt lol fair test omg, everyone has 40k on his bank ...

  • @Allardio Waaayyyy cheaper.

  • 8cyl 6cyl and 4cyl should not be compared, if mitsubishi made a v6 turbo like the GTR i bet it would kick the pants off of most cars if not all cars, with that being said they shouldnt compare a 8 6 or 4cyl cars at all they should pick on the thing there own size.

  • @Thisismine44441 So you shouldn't compare a Lamborghini Gallardo with a Ferrari f430?! or a BMW M3 (E46 model) with an Audi RS4?

  • @Thisismine44441 They used to, 3000gt Vr4, it was an awesome car and I can't wait for a replacement!

  • EVO FTW!!!!!

  • ass clowns cannot drive :-/

  • Why didn't they put them around a racetrack? Loved the nitrogen filled tires comment... The FQ probably missed that detail.

  • In real life driving, I'm confident that the GTR has a better low down torque due to larger displacement. Does this EvoX FQ400 have a same turbo lag like the older EvoVIII FQ400?

    Turbo lags can massively annoy drivers especially in slow traffic. Even a N/A 1.6L Fiat station wagon has beaten an Evo8 FQ400 when both are on their top gears, rolling start from (so to say) 35MPH or 60 KPH. In this kind of comparison, the GTR will make mince meat even on sixth gear.

  • 3.8l V6 vs 2.0l V4. Sportscar vs rally saloon.470-500hp vs 400. Why do people compare them, its not natural.

  • @MrPecony

    Well we can but by looking at the specs more closely. I'm confident the GTR has better low down torque over the modded FQ400 EvoX. With a big turbo in EvoX I'm sure there's big turbo lag like the EvoVIII FQ400. I maybe wrong but if you want so much power on such a small engine, surely there's price to pay for that much power.

    To make matters even worse, the FQ400 can stall very easily unless you're the man of that or if it has a dual clutch gearbox.

  • @godzillat6 yep without a turbo a base engine of Evo VIII (4g63) by data I have on my desk produced only 178Nm of Torque. Thats why turbo plays a huge role in evo. (off-topic note: EVOX FQ400 model is currently car with best torque per liter ratio in the world)

    I am a fan of Mitsubishi and I am employed in Mitsubishi parts store :), and to me both cars are great, I just don't like them being compared.

  • This test is interesting but obviously a promotion for the FQ400. The FQ400 is a great car but having owned both cars (just the EVO not the FQ400) both cars with mild mods the GTR will destroy the EVO X. The EVO X will need some pretty serious mods + race gas just to keep up with the GTR bumping up its boost on pump gas. Now in my opinion the EVO X drives better and feels more connected with the road than the GTR (the GTR just drives 'smart' for whatever that is worth) but come on...

  • test was stupid but the words at the end did make sense

  • v6 vs. 4cyl? what a waste!

    in terms of speed GTR will win, but in handling no doubts FQ will win.

    a "super car" vs. a "rally bred car" it's totally a mismatch.

    i was thinking if the discontinued GTO's/3000GT of mitsubishi can withstand a GTR?

    but for me, fq still looks a lot better than gtr. it's just me.

  • Everyone look up "gtr alpha 9" and prepare to be blown away. If that doesn't tickle your fancy try "gtr alpha 12."

  • gtr is superior overall, but il stick to me EVO :D

  • lets see nissan gt-r rapes mustang super snake? lol whose the dumbass who thinks the nissan v10 TT engine is ricey?!?!

  • @ZackPorter2010 v6***

  • @ZackPorter2010 whos the dumbass who thinks the gtr has a V10?

  • @daffyvader i said v6 retard.. i was watching a video with the gtr racing a lexus LFA which has a supercharged v10 i corrected myself in the comments if you would have looked

  • Evos better for the price, and obvicely the get is faster it's twin turbo 3.8 6 cylinders bs 2.0 4 cylinders and only 1 turbo

  • Evo wins again!!! Dragi Sveti Nikola, ove sam godine bio jako dobar......

  • you guys are gay ass fags

  • Evo easily wins.

    It's only got a 2lt engine...

    the GT-R has a 3.8.

    No wonder it's quicker to 100.

    Would still have the Evo it's nicer!

  • Evo X is one of the meanest machines out-there.

  • Comment removed

  • He only used the term "rice rockets" because the British will never be able to make a car that could compete on a international level like the GT-R or Evo.

  • @12389h lol um all fq's are from uk idiot, straight from japan to uk with no engine or major performance parts only the gadgets and wheels n stuff like that... then assembled by hks uk with hks engine and the rest

  • @13TheRoom13 What are you talking about? The FQ engines are all Japanese engines just tuned in the UK. Also HKS is a Japanese company. I'm talking about British "sports" cars: Aston Martins, Jaguar etc. They're all failed companies, Japanese and German 4 door saloons smoke the best UK has to offer.

  • For the people always say rice rockets this rice rockets that whenever they get the chance. I don't care what you call it as long as you know it will leave you in the dust.

  • Evo is more better , but driver suxx

  • rice rocket.fuckin hate that term..asians are here to stay motherfuckers!

  • i like gtr better

  • lol @ 24 music

  • Driver makes the car not these silly tests

  • This comparison is stupid, they arent even using the same driver. Skill plays a huge part in testing 

  • @1337superboy they do the same thing on top gear kid

  • @fuckingkidsthesedays They use different drivers for most of the testing, but the final test is always done by the stig. and besides top gear is a show for entertainment, not to be taken too seriously.

  • i prefer gt-r

  • Proper manual gear box is right. Give me 3 pedals, or give me death!

  • Evo=1 less turbo Evo=2 less cylinders Evo=$22,000 less. Evo is the real winner, Nissan is a mad noob when it comes to AWD Turbo, Mitsubishi has been doing it right for more than 20 years.

  • Of course the GTR lost....YOU NEED AN ASIAN TO DRIVE AN ASIAN CAR!!! Lol :P

  • @rahal23 duh what you make fun of the asian you motha faka, go fak yourself go fak fak fak fak yo motha

  • @AznKid7373 True....Lol

  • @rahal23 Mitsubishi motors is a Japanese brand too.

  • @rahal23 aren't they both asian?

  • @Aqlor Yes but I was joking when I said that. And what I mean is that the driver isn't that much skilled at driving the GTR.

  • @rahal23 Well if you need skill to drive a particular car I think that makes it worse.

  • @b4igetu no hes saying that asian drivers, specifically japanese people can usually get the best from a car because japanese people are the most skilled

  • @rahal23 racist much?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @rahal23 Both cars are Japanese .......

  • @rahal23 Mitsu is asian fyi...

  • @rahal23 sod off

  • @rahal23 mitsubishi is asian too...so its still even

  • Evo IX was faster than X.

  • I used to own a evo 6 gsr an it was amazing to drive i can only imagine how good the evo x is, i drive a scooby now

  • this idiot cant drive!!!! evo faster? anything is faster than gtr when this asshole is driving

  • I'd rather pay less than half the price for the Evo..

  • the fq400 is almost the same price as a gtr...

  • @LolAtRice Yeah I see what you're saying, but surely G force in turns is related more to the grip generated from the tyres and suspension? A Lotus Exige for instance, will pull higher G in corners than say, a Dodge Viper, even though the Lotus is a slower car in a straight line. The guy in the video seems to be equating straightline speed, with inertial grip.

  • that guys voice is so grating after listening to jeremy clarksons soothing brogue

  • That is all I hear, The Lancer is Simple its meant to be a driving enthusiasts car, People who enjoy just the feel and drive and want a car that is going to do what its told, The GT-R does that but at a risk of breaking your neck.

    Also RiceRockets are meant for bikes, Ricer cars are meant for kids who soup up jap cars with silly little bf

  • Two badass car!

  • it wasnt the cars in this test, it was the drivers

  • why this video is the only one on youtube that makes a comparison test of the FQ 400?

  • they left off the fact that the GT-R is double the price...

  • id still get an evo

  • Higher top speed = higher cornering G force?!? Right, so a bullet corners better than a gokart? Faggots

  • @RFID666 G is the force of acceleration relative to free fall in gravity, where the vector sum of any force other than gravity experienced by an object (like the driver in car) is measured. G force is not the "ability to turn", but heavier objects tend to resist the cornering force (since the force will try to continue straight), and higher G is experienced by the driver. So lower the ability of car to corner, the higher the G :-)

  • No I realize G-force has nothing to do with a car's 'ability' to turn. Higher grip from tyres, low mass, and well setup suspension will increase the amount of G you can pull while cornering. The top speed of a car is not related to that, and neither is the mass.

    "So lower the ability of car to corner, the higher the G" So weld the steering rack and you will pull more G? Erm no.

  • @RFID666

    Dude, you're talking to a physics masters student lol Try studying a little harder on physics next time you want to post something as stupid as "bullet corners better than a gokart".

  • @rubik00 Why the attitude? Have I been rude to you? No. I was being sarcastic with the 'bullet' comment. I will explain again, because you seem to be a bit 'special' (especially for a "physics masters student lol")

    The Guy in the video introduces the GTR to the G test by saying: 'the 193mph top speed should give it the edge" My point was, that top speed has NOTHING to do with cornering G. Maybe you should read things more carefully, as you look slightly stupid now.

  • how about the price?

  • yeah evos are great cars, i would love one but gtrs are better and i would love one even more! you cant beat japanese machines.

  • If not done by top gear, it's not scientific

  • really "rice rockets".... fucking wankers

  • I'd go with a GT-R

    the evo is great but every ricer in my neighborhood has em so i h8 that shit

  • gtr is better everybody with a smart brain knows that

  • EVO FTW .. I LOVE IT .. BEST CAR EVER BUILT !!!