A problem for these antigun nuts is that our MILITARY employs 18-22 year olds, trains and allows them to USE guns and last I heard they werent shooting each other!
GUNS !
The ONLY difference between citizens and cops with guns is a UNIFORM !
A problem for these antigun nuts is that our MILITARY employs 18-22 year olds, trains and allows them to USE guns and last I heard they werent shooting each other!
And its a complete joke to say that guns dont stop criminals.
I guess we need to inform our COPS to stop using their guns against criminals.
These nuts who dont think guns are the answer are the ones saying to call the cops who show up with WHAT?
GUNS !
The ONLY difference between citizens and cops with guns is a UNIFORM !
A problem for these antigun nuts is that our MILITARY employs 18-22 year olds, trains and allows them to USE guns and last I heard they werent shooting each other!
And its a complete joke to say that guns dont stop criminals.
I guess we need to inform our COPS to stop using their guns against criminals.
These nuts who dont think guns are the answer are the ones saying to call the cops who show up with WHAT?
GUNS !
The ONLY difference between citizens and cops with guns is a UNIFORM !
A problem for these antigun nuts is that our MILITARY employs 18-22 year olds, trains and allows them to USE guns and last I heard they werent shooting each other!
And its a complete joke to say that guns dont stop criminals.
I guess we need to inform our COPS to stop using their guns against criminals.
These nuts who dont think guns are the answer are the ones saying to call the cops who show up with WHAT?
GUNS !
The ONLY difference between citizens and cops with guns is a UNIFORM !
I'm impressed by the people who responded positively. Remember, a regulation prohibiting carry will not deter someone who plans on committing a massacre... All campus shooters are cowards so the possibility of a student with the ability to put them down is a deterrent 100 times better than a rule saying you can't carry your gun. Mass murderers generally don't obey laws anyhow.
what some of these people being interviewed dont undertstand is the difference between feeling safe and being safe. by the way when SECONDS count the police are just MINUTES away.
Everyone who disagrees on the Right (Obligation) to Carry about Permit holders - are idiots. They are afraid of guns and don't know how to properly use a firearm.
People with Permits go through a Federal Background Check. They Deny more people than they Allow more people. It's a proven statistic.
I tell people, "Well...I can't carry a cop" is 100% effective in getting the point across.
Why ask a sheep if they would want self protection, and they don't even know they are lambs to the slaughter?
Most these people in the video don't use logic at all... they are lambs, sheep... where as a logical person would want to exercise their right to personal protection.
Honey, just keep telling yourself that your "gun free zones" are making you safer... you might as well start wearing "RAPE FREE ZONE" T-Shirts, to "protect" yourself from rapists.
imagine what would happen if students could carry their concealed gun on campus...VT would not have happened the way it did. 32 people is a horrible loss...if the gunman could have been neutralized at the very beginning...well 32 people could be alive today!
The thing is, the people responsible for the shootings commit them on a campus because there is less likely for someone to be there that can stop them, before they can carry out their plans. It's a lot of unarmed people, in one spot. The more chances there are of having someone that could intercept a violent offender before they could finish their spree, the better the chances are of limiting the damages they do. CCL holders have undergone federal background checks, and classes, to get them.
Its hard to agree with any one side. I personally have two pistols I switch carrying, and in a school setting with so many people I see wild gunfire exchanges high likely. Now the permit holder is more likely to for responsibly yes? But are they going to set a stance and fire like at a range or are they going to shoot blindly around a corner so they aren't exposing themselves to return fire? I thought I approved at first but now I just don't know...
Things to consider: Shooting at the range is nothing like shooting under fire. Student and faculty armed personnel may unintentionally harm others or cause more panic by sending more bullets flying. Also, many of these crimes (including the VA Tech massacre) are committed using legally obtained firearms, meaning these psychos managed to get permits. Lastly, more guns does not necessarily mean less crime. Japan is a good example. The truth is that all of this is more complicated than that.
"imagine what would happen if people were allowed to have guns..." Those psychopaths would have been stopped before they got to kill several people. It is a fact that in areas where concealed carry is allowed crime rates are lower.
This has been flagged as spam show
"more guns arent the answer"
WHAT DO THE COPS SHOW UP WITH ???? :-D
A problem for these antigun nuts is that our MILITARY employs 18-22 year olds, trains and allows them to USE guns and last I heard they werent shooting each other!
GUNS !
The ONLY difference between citizens and cops with guns is a UNIFORM !
wmtipton 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A problem for these antigun nuts is that our MILITARY employs 18-22 year olds, trains and allows them to USE guns and last I heard they werent shooting each other!
And its a complete joke to say that guns dont stop criminals.
I guess we need to inform our COPS to stop using their guns against criminals.
These nuts who dont think guns are the answer are the ones saying to call the cops who show up with WHAT?
GUNS !
The ONLY difference between citizens and cops with guns is a UNIFORM !
wmtipton 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A problem for these antigun nuts is that our MILITARY employs 18-22 year olds, trains and allows them to USE guns and last I heard they werent shooting each other!
And its a complete joke to say that guns dont stop criminals.
I guess we need to inform our COPS to stop using their guns against criminals.
These nuts who dont think guns are the answer are the ones saying to call the cops who show up with WHAT?
GUNS !
The ONLY difference between citizens and cops with guns is a UNIFORM !
wmtipton 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A problem for these antigun nuts is that our MILITARY employs 18-22 year olds, trains and allows them to USE guns and last I heard they werent shooting each other!
And its a complete joke to say that guns dont stop criminals.
I guess we need to inform our COPS to stop using their guns against criminals.
These nuts who dont think guns are the answer are the ones saying to call the cops who show up with WHAT?
GUNS !
The ONLY difference between citizens and cops with guns is a UNIFORM !
wmtipton 1 year ago
I'm impressed by the people who responded positively. Remember, a regulation prohibiting carry will not deter someone who plans on committing a massacre... All campus shooters are cowards so the possibility of a student with the ability to put them down is a deterrent 100 times better than a rule saying you can't carry your gun. Mass murderers generally don't obey laws anyhow.
andrewziegler206 1 year ago
Stupid cunt at the begining of the movie... Please do not reproduce.
bonusballs 3 years ago 4
what some of these people being interviewed dont undertstand is the difference between feeling safe and being safe. by the way when SECONDS count the police are just MINUTES away.
Elrohogrande 3 years ago 5
Everyone who disagrees on the Right (Obligation) to Carry about Permit holders - are idiots. They are afraid of guns and don't know how to properly use a firearm.
People with Permits go through a Federal Background Check. They Deny more people than they Allow more people. It's a proven statistic.
I tell people, "Well...I can't carry a cop" is 100% effective in getting the point across.
UHOSP 3 years ago
Crasma LMAO nice comments
BigWyatt01 3 years ago
the first chick they interview on this video is a freakin moron
clustro2 3 years ago 3
Why ask a sheep if they would want self protection, and they don't even know they are lambs to the slaughter?
Most these people in the video don't use logic at all... they are lambs, sheep... where as a logical person would want to exercise their right to personal protection.
cramsa 3 years ago 7
Honey, just keep telling yourself that your "gun free zones" are making you safer... you might as well start wearing "RAPE FREE ZONE" T-Shirts, to "protect" yourself from rapists.
cramsa 3 years ago 8
She forgets that it is the nut with the gun that is the problem not the gun itself. The person with the CCDW is not the threat.
jimitl5 3 years ago 2
imagine what would happen if students could carry their concealed gun on campus...VT would not have happened the way it did. 32 people is a horrible loss...if the gunman could have been neutralized at the very beginning...well 32 people could be alive today!
SCCCatBSU 3 years ago
The thing is, the people responsible for the shootings commit them on a campus because there is less likely for someone to be there that can stop them, before they can carry out their plans. It's a lot of unarmed people, in one spot. The more chances there are of having someone that could intercept a violent offender before they could finish their spree, the better the chances are of limiting the damages they do. CCL holders have undergone federal background checks, and classes, to get them.
Maelstromofthemind 3 years ago
i hate fucking liberals
xjaronx 3 years ago 3
That first chick, the 18 year old, is a complete twat. I really enjoyed hearing her say, "you know, like, what happened at Virginia Tech".
It's as if she just could not at all grasp the logic that surrounded what she said. Absolutely absurd.
przc 3 years ago 3
Its hard to agree with any one side. I personally have two pistols I switch carrying, and in a school setting with so many people I see wild gunfire exchanges high likely. Now the permit holder is more likely to for responsibly yes? But are they going to set a stance and fire like at a range or are they going to shoot blindly around a corner so they aren't exposing themselves to return fire? I thought I approved at first but now I just don't know...
YllwFvrPB 3 years ago
Things to consider: Shooting at the range is nothing like shooting under fire. Student and faculty armed personnel may unintentionally harm others or cause more panic by sending more bullets flying. Also, many of these crimes (including the VA Tech massacre) are committed using legally obtained firearms, meaning these psychos managed to get permits. Lastly, more guns does not necessarily mean less crime. Japan is a good example. The truth is that all of this is more complicated than that.
sophitablue 3 years ago
"imagine what would happen if people were allowed to have guns..." Those psychopaths would have been stopped before they got to kill several people. It is a fact that in areas where concealed carry is allowed crime rates are lower.
enjoytheride85 3 years ago 3
lol, almost all these people are nitwits.
americanna 3 years ago