If you have a q9650 why do you need to upgrade it has 4 cores too
this is far enough for the new games on max settings or 70-75 fps isn't enough or what? I played this game on medium-high configuration and I was happy if I got 30 fps
I was thinking of buying a GTX 560, it should be able to get more frames hopefully since it's more powerful than the 5870 from the benches ive seen :D
Videos like this show how an upgrade in cpu sockets (+motherboard, ram and cooler) you are far better off doing than constantly upgrading graphics cards to get the most out of your games. This is socket 775 45nm vs socket 1155 32nm. Also consider if your current psu would support the newer socket. Far better off spending £250 on new cpu ram and board than on a soon to be outdated graphics card. I am sticking with my 775 set up still for now though because of £s I dont have...
I've got major performance issues with my phenom II 940. It feels like my cpu is bottlenecking the system (4GB RAM, 560ti). But I guess it's some stupid driver issue because Black Ops runs with 60fps and beyond on Win XP and 40fps and less on Win 7. I thought about waiting for Bulldozer but 2500K is just too tempting. I'm getting one at the end of the week together with 8GB RAM and an ASUS P8Z68-V :D I can hardly wait
i have at max settings for about 60 - 70 sometimes a peak when i look at the ground or something you know ;) Specs are on my channel. Please tell me if thats a good rate of fps thanks :)
You're introducing a CPU limitation to inflate the results. A better comparison would be with them both at either the same clock speeds (4GHz vs 4GHz) or average overclocks (4GHz vs. 4.5GHz) and using a resolution of 1920x1080 or higher with 4x AA, 16xAF and HBAO on. Memory speed should be the same as well.
for comparison its better to clock the CPU's at the same speed, say 4.2. Also what kind of ramspeed is the Q9650 using 445x9 1:1 = 890Mhz or 6:5=1068Mhz . This would matter against the DDR3 with the 2500k.
Not totally fair now, still the difference isnt even that big ~115 vs ~90
If you have a q9650 why do you need to upgrade it has 4 cores too
this is far enough for the new games on max settings or 70-75 fps isn't enough or what? I played this game on medium-high configuration and I was happy if I got 30 fps
Kristof19192 1 month ago
I have q9450@3.2ghz GTX 460 1GB and 4GB DDR2.
I will wait for sandy bridge equivalent of i5 2500k and nvidia gtx 560-570.
SuperThe86 1 month ago
@SuperThe86 is that a joke ? i5 2500k is sandy bridge
chilldog1234567890 4 weeks ago
@chilldog1234567890 sorry
Ivy Bridge equivalent of i5 2500k
SuperThe86 4 weeks ago
Just orderer my i5 2500K today. Gonna replace 2.5year old Q9650@3.4ghz which was struggling with GTX570..
Asestar 1 month ago
i dont understand, q9650 or 2500k better?
BayramJ 2 months ago
Q9650 IS better!!
FFF693 4 months ago
@FFF693 how? 0.o
iloveyouhammie 2 months ago
@FFF693, Really?
2203932008 2 months ago
@FFF693 Are you stupid?, are you not seeing the FPS, the Q9650 is about 70 FPS lower then the 2500k?
Cyrus0305 1 month ago
Q9550, wanting to get into live streaming more... yeah I want a 2600k :P
But I think ill wait for the next gens and maybe get one of them 6core socket 2011 cpu's from Intel (yes its gonna break the bank)
Decenium 5 months ago
and i'm happy with a core 2 duo e7300@3.05GHz +GTS 450 =)
TheComputadorFoda 5 months ago
The memory subsystem is slow. However if you bring fsb to 500 and DRAM to 1200mhz the Q9x50 is still blazing fast in todays games.
rapistmurderer 5 months ago
Oh Hi, I am very important internet person and I have a couple comments.
I see your hax running in the background.
One is clearly at 640 resolution, the slow one.
Where are the hotchix in this music video?
Big TL is better than small tL
My Q9550 at 3.6 has 8GB of RAM and that totall kicks 2500k's tail
azsyndicate 6 months ago
@azsyndicate ...
just die.
Tried2Commentate 5 months ago
@azsyndicate your quad core doesn't even come close to the 2500K's performance or memory bandwidth. sorry buddy.
LordJummy 5 months ago
@azsyndicate hogwash, i have a q9650 @ 4ghz and 8 gigs @ circa 1100 5-5-5-15
though it does hold its fucking own, it does not bench as high as a 2500k.
84HASNOVIDEOS 3 months ago
Also because the 2500k was overclocked higher.
tazss159 6 months ago
yeah not upgrading my Q9400 till at least BF3 comes out.
xamanto 6 months ago
Could you please test on a modern emulator like pcsx2 or dolphin?
I would love to see the difference!
johnaiton 6 months ago
lol the 1st monitor (Q9650) is something like 1080p and the 2nd monitor (2500k) is a CRT 1024x768 LOL!!! Nice try noob...
billthekid1982 6 months ago
@billthekid1982 If you look at the description... both setups running at 1600x1200 resolution ;)
trisanosh 6 months ago
@billthekid1982 they are both 1600x1200, fucktard.
Tried2Commentate 5 months ago
on me it shows just 30 :/
shahrouzkhan200 6 months ago
@MutaFukinBadAss Dual CPU, wait for LGA2011.
Stashmyash 7 months ago
@MutaFukinBadAss same man i got a 2500k fixed everything
Blimp01 7 months ago
Great video.
I was thinking of buying a GTX 560, it should be able to get more frames hopefully since it's more powerful than the 5870 from the benches ive seen :D
ThePunisherNWO 7 months ago
Videos like this show how an upgrade in cpu sockets (+motherboard, ram and cooler) you are far better off doing than constantly upgrading graphics cards to get the most out of your games. This is socket 775 45nm vs socket 1155 32nm. Also consider if your current psu would support the newer socket. Far better off spending £250 on new cpu ram and board than on a soon to be outdated graphics card. I am sticking with my 775 set up still for now though because of £s I dont have...
keith23uk 7 months ago
great video!
for the first time in 5 years i'm going to consider a cpu change
Nhirlathothep 7 months ago
I've got major performance issues with my phenom II 940. It feels like my cpu is bottlenecking the system (4GB RAM, 560ti). But I guess it's some stupid driver issue because Black Ops runs with 60fps and beyond on Win XP and 40fps and less on Win 7. I thought about waiting for Bulldozer but 2500K is just too tempting. I'm getting one at the end of the week together with 8GB RAM and an ASUS P8Z68-V :D I can hardly wait
Great Video, dude!
MartinGro131 7 months ago
Btw Nice video :)
ultragaming1993 7 months ago
i have at max settings for about 60 - 70 sometimes a peak when i look at the ground or something you know ;) Specs are on my channel. Please tell me if thats a good rate of fps thanks :)
ultragaming1993 7 months ago
ok, this is not an accurate comparison. Do the two have the same parts, speeds, bus, cooling, case, manufacturers? Not so controlled if you ask me.
LazyMax05 7 months ago
You're introducing a CPU limitation to inflate the results. A better comparison would be with them both at either the same clock speeds (4GHz vs 4GHz) or average overclocks (4GHz vs. 4.5GHz) and using a resolution of 1920x1080 or higher with 4x AA, 16xAF and HBAO on. Memory speed should be the same as well.
Atheismrulez 7 months ago
bollox
fademan 8 months ago
Q9650 AWESOME CPU ;) 12MB Cache!!
FFF693 8 months ago
@FFF693 45 nm :(
yeisonsystem323 8 months ago
@yeisonsystem323 :D
FFF693 8 months ago
i have an ASUS P5B S-775, so i go with an Q9650 :) 12MB Cache :O
AeroFix94 8 months ago
Also dude, it would be good to see the difference between fps when actuall fighting is happening on the screen.
Helpful video anyway.
OpethDisciple 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Iv been thinking about upgrading my Qx9650@3.7Ghz to a Sandy Bridge or new Bulldozer, and was hoping that an upgrade would get more out of my 5870.
In your experience you think it will get more perforamce out my gpu.
My full specs are:
QX9650 @ 3.7GHz
x48 Asus Rampage Formula
5870 2Gb, 4Gb 820MHz ram
Win 7 x64
OpethDisciple 9 months ago
Comment removed
OpethDisciple 9 months ago
for comparison its better to clock the CPU's at the same speed, say 4.2. Also what kind of ramspeed is the Q9650 using 445x9 1:1 = 890Mhz or 6:5=1068Mhz . This would matter against the DDR3 with the 2500k.
Not totally fair now, still the difference isnt even that big ~115 vs ~90
TheInitialG 9 months ago
good video shiznilti.
sick of trolls saying this is BS.
nka203 10 months ago
great video helps me justify upgrading from amd to intel.
going from a amd phenom 940 at 3,6ghz to the following pc parts.
i5 2500k (will oc to around 4.5 - 4.8ghz)
noctua NH D14 cpu cooler
gigabyte P67A UD4 B3 mobo
8gb G-skill ram 1600mhz
GTX 570
Corsair 850w modular psu
still waiting for the 2500k to de delivered then i can finally build this rig
leezaal 10 months ago
Good job Shiz. Yeah those new Intel 2500k and 2600k are just freaking amazing.
gregfrom215 11 months ago
I gotta get one of these, my athlon cant handle shit :D
TheGraphxMaker 11 months ago
awesome vid man
we want more of that pls
yasserlee 11 months ago
i knew my q9550 wasnt good enough, i drop to 40 fps in explosions and gpu drops like a shit to like 40% (gtx 580)
Blimp01 11 months ago
Great video.
tlbig10 11 months ago
nice video!! love it
firroaga 11 months ago
Thanks man, very helpful+
taguardian 11 months ago
This is good info. I'm upgrading from a Q6600 @ 3.4 w/ 2x 5770s to a 2500K when my motherboard gets back from RMA. Bought a MSI P67 GD65... "oops."
nemtastic 11 months ago