14th Amendment stripped the right of the states to violate the Constitutional Rights of its citizens....to include separation of church and state, or for consenting adults to form a union....or what Derek said Personally I will ever vote for someone who doesn't accept evolution ... Not a religious test, a reality test.
Your second argument is also flawed on the issue of states rights and gay marriage. If you and Ron Paul are true libertarians, then you should definitively recognize that rights are first and foremost given to individuals, and not states or collectives. This is recognized as a Core Democratic Value known as Minority Rights, and to deny this would means you think that the State Governments cannot be beholden to the Bill of Rights.
Your first argument is wrong ten seconds in. Not sure if you knew that the current supreme court is split with Anthony Kennedy in the middle, and Ruth Nader Ginsburg is going to retire soon. If she is replaced by a pro-life justice, then there will be a 5-4 majority on that issue, and it could be repealed via amendment, the next Justice will be appointed by the President. So far Obama has appointed 2 pro-choice judges, whereas Paul would not So yeah, you're definitely wrong on that.
Spot on analysis. I am curious tho. You said that you were a satanist. Assuming you are a libertarian how can you believe in satanism since it harms others. Perhaps we have different definitions of satanism? What is yours?
I enjoyed your video. You are well spoken and articulate, and you're prety spot-on. Fuck these close-minded haters, and fuck the "amazing" atheist. The fact that you're a satanist just goes to show how broad Paul's supporters are, because he represents true liberty, and that we're not all fundamentalist Christian nut-bags. You have my support, man. Keep fighting the good fight or whatever.
Um...I have a question: How are you this fucked in the head? Ron Paul's interpretation of the Constitution is about as ass-backwards as his religious beliefs. Under Ron Paul, we'd have no infrastructure, he'd kill education, throw food and medical regulations under the bus, and he's just a general idiot.
And the media is terrified and he doesn't support corporations? Wants to get rid of the FDA!
And lastly, you have no idea what an ad hominem is.
I think I'd know what an ad hominem argument is, considering I already studied advanced logic and aced it.
Ron Paul supports the constitution as it was meant to be understood, not the candy coated liberal definition which all but ignores the tenth amendment.
The FDA doesn't work! Remember under George Bush when the FDA basically did whatever he said and ignored its job? All these bureaucracies are volatile and useless.
Argument from authority much? You're still wrong, ad hom attacks are when an argument is attacked due to the character or past of an individual or group rather than its premises. Ron Paul is simply an idiot, but that's not my basis for attacking his arguments, it's just spice added for flavor.
And which 'way it was meant to be understood'? You mean by slave-owning hypocrites? You do realize that there are 3 equally valid schools of constitutional interpretation, right?
@Styxhexenhammer666 Furthermore, the FDA DOES work. Does it work perfectly? Hell fucking no. Does that mean we should abandon it wholeheartedly? No, it means we should FIX IT. You know, there's a bit of a draft in the sealing around my window, I should probably knock it out.
And advanced logic courses tend to skip over informal fallacies as they'd be covered in 101 logic classes.
And once more I'm just going to point out that you clearly have no understanding of constitutional interpretation.
@madnessinmysoul The problem with constitutional interpretation being it is often done in an illogical and almost certainly misinformed manner... Such as when politicians attempt to ban guns... or allow the federal government to regulate drugs.
@Styxhexenhammer666 Really? Where in the Constitution does it give us a right to personal ownership of guns? #2 doesn't say anything about individual ownership, though it does mention militias...historical context is sort of needed there.
And drug regulation is implicit in the powers of Congress, either under the interstate commerce clause or in their protection of the general welfare. Of course, regulation and prohibition are two entirely different things.
@Styxhexenhammer666 Really? Quote mining the constitution is a bit of a stretch. You cut out half a sentence.
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." <-that's the full quote. The right of the people to keep and bear arms is a clause directing relating to the necessity of a well regulated militia.
And now an appeal to ridicule. You sure you aced that logic class?
@madnessinmysoul Do you know who the militia were back in those days? Private citizen volunteers.
Do you advocate the removal of firearms from the populous? This question pertains to the conversation. Otherwise you seem to be arguing as the devil's advocate.
@Styxhexenhammer666 Do you know what the militia is these days? Private citizen volunteers. At least, that's what the National Guard appears to be.
Do you advocate that we give everyone a nuclear weapon? That's about as relevant to the conversation as what you asked me. I advocate heavy regulation on firearms and that we should revise the amendment for the single reason that firearms have changed so drastically since the amendment was written.
This is just wrong. Ron Paul has stated countless of times that he will work for a PRO LIFE policy.
Besides, all ron paul is saying is ""Remove rights that the government have, and let the state have them"". So now, instead of the government deciding what you can and cant do (which Ron Paul supporters say its wrong because its a two wolf one sheep situation) a state can decide what you can and cant do. Its the exact same situation.
People need to understand that Religion was only important long ago when we used fairy-tales to explain the gaps left by our once limited understanding of the universe. Religion should be irrelevant at this point, look at other developed countries like Sweden. We shouldn't encourage our children to look for an imaginary deity for answers.
Education leads to rational thought and logical ideas, America's abysmal education system is part of the problem. Religion causes death. Nothing more
I'd say you are the most educated Satanist I've ever seen. Albeit, I am from Mississippi, so the "Satanists" I've here tend to believe in a literal Satan or some God-like entity of evil and are not true Satanists. Anyway, as a Mississippi Catholic, I like many of your videos...especially this one. Peace, brother.
@Styxhexenhammer666 I feel like you should say that satanists don't worship the devil and instead are more about developing the God in themselves when you mention it so you don't have to put up with idiots like that. I am not religious, I am not atheist but I know a fuckload more about religion than most religious and atheist people do, funny that, annoying that.
It was also economical to use Jim Crowe laws once upon a time. It was also economical to have monopolies before the Sherman-Clayton Antitrust act which abolished large-scale corporations which squashed small business owners and polluted the political enviornment, which is facing a resurgence of such bad politics, and this was a federal mandate to ensure people's rights and it WORKED up until the neo-cons decided to take advantage of loopholes in the system.
1) Yes, it's already been decided in the courts. So has slavery and women's rights. Would you support a racist sexist? Personal opinions on these issues matter.
Ron Paul has supported and voted to ban partial-birth abortion in 2000 and 2003. Paul introduced the Sanctity of Life Act of 2005. He does not care about women's rights, and that matters.
I'm not sure why you'd want a state to be allowed to hate gays. Slavery should be left to the states. Nice.
Times are changing, all these social issues are getting more liberalized. Even Mississippi, which is redneck bigot racist central, couldn't get half their population to vote to define life as beginning at conception.
@Styxhexenhammer666 I'm not saying I wouldn't want to ban partial-birth abortions, but it shows that Paul is a hypocrite on that issue, when he wants the federal government to do it instead of the states.
@Styxhexenhammer666 Lol...aw come on now. I'll admit, we are redneck...but as far as bigots and racist there are only a few left. That went out of style 20 years ago. I mean, 3 of my great-great grandfathers were confederate soldiers (and I am proud of their service to their country, though I detest both war and slavery). I mean, I took an African-American girl to prom and I heard no complaints. She was definitely the best dressed girl and most awesome dancer there. New Mississippi is new.
@Styxhexenhammer666 Because the law in Mississippi would've led to absurd results where things regularly done in processes like in-vitro fertilization would've been considered murder under the proposed law. The law's backers claimed it wouldn't have been used that way, but I trust what the law actually says, not what people tell me about it. Mississippi is NOT getting more liberalized. If anything it's becoming more conservative. I lived there until recently and it's quite apparent.
Your logic is incredibly poor, dude. I am to support Paul even though his beliefs are anathema to me? Just because he won't be do all the crap he would want to do due to constraints on his power? He can appoint SCOTUS judges who WILL overturn Roe V Wade. And "states rights" is just the far right's way of getting their backwards laws enacted in some states. CIVIL RIGHTS ARE A FEDERAL ISSUE.
Dude you have proven AmazingAtheists' points perfectly!! You get a resounding F on your "logic".
@MrSurfingdreamer Or agnostics. I happen to be an agnostic Satanist. I give little thought to deities since most of the gods and goddesses mankind has invented make no sense.
If you're a 'satanist' then you're already a dumbfuck. LOL! No REAL philosophical thinker considers themselves a satanist when it's just another word for other philosophical modes of thought that exist already but just wrapped in an eggroll of pseudo-mystery/magic and self-superiority thinking.
santanist means oppeser witch mean u were hardcore Atheist then proper word for santanist is Prometheus witch He was a champion of mankind not the destroyer unlike the unholy father
@Styxhexenhammer666 Ron Paul wants to return to the gold standard. That would essentially halt social and technological progress as the govt would no longer be able to make investments in scientific research and development. The space program, which gave us amazing returns, would never be possible with a gold standard.
@Odysseus087 HAHA Wow. You're just not too bright are you? And how much investment goes into important technologies like geothermal energy which could essentially eliminate the need for all fossil fuels and be able to power our homes for about a dollar a year with in the next 10 years? How much are they investing in that right now? Because they seem to be able to come up with over 400 billion dollars a year to spend on military.
@MatthewPotter8 So you agree then that Ron Paul is not the answer. The military, police force, and courts are the only things that Ron Paul wants the federal govt to fund. I agree with you that geothermal energy is the future and that the govt should invest in it like they did with the space program. The federal government can accomplish great things when money is spent properly. It happened in the past and can again if we get lobbyists and corporate money out of politics.
Hey brother, i know most satanists are misunderstood. My spiritual beliefs probably differ from yours, but we both agree on ron paul. Most of ron pauls arguments are mathematical, and sensible and hes one of the only knowledgable candidates. So im just happy to see that ppl of all faiths can rally ron paul because no matter what faith we can see consistency and reason. Thanks for your video and peace my friend.
@10lettername just because hes a satanist you should dismiss him besides have you seen christians? they are all hypocrites there pro life, but pro war, how can you sopprt life but allow the murder of innocent people
Why are you putting words in my mouth? I value the views of Christians as much as I do the views of satanists, which is very little., why do you feel the need to assume things about me to fuel your standpoint? And In terms of my standpoints on war and abortion, I have never mentioned my views on either, so why would you say "how can you support life but allow the murder of innocent people?" when i never mentioned my stand on those topics?
If your hair was a little darker & your skin was a little lighter, people might start thinking that Michael Jackson is still alive =)
On a serious note, you can simply say that Mr. Paul works well with the separation of church & state, despite his personal beliefs - which is an indication of the pure liberty he wants to instill in the lives of the people.
1) The states are pushing through plenty of laws on abortion, and he would be appointing the judges reviewing those.
2) Federal government and states have and are pushing through laws on homosexual marriage as well, and these are reviewed by same judges.
3) Lack of acceptance of evolution indicates unwillingness to accept the best way we have come up with to come up with answers as close to the truth as achievable.
I think you got it wrong on the abortion part. Paul said in Liberty Defined that he would work to strip the Supreme Court of authority over abortion (which is a constitutional process) and repeal Roe v. Wade, thus allowing individual states to decide on the matter. So he wouldn't outlaw it, but he would make changes to the status quo.
why are people bashing this guy for choosing to be satanist? remember, this is a free country..with the ability to believe in what you want, as long as you don't bother others. something that Ron Paul believes in. Thanks for this video..you explained things well.
Im a queer feminist chican@ for Ron Paul. Aint nobody gonna have babies, get married, or lick a lollipop when the dollar is sucked completely under. WAKE UP PEOPLE RON PAUL IS OUR ONLY HOPE!! AND HE AINT NO OBI WAN
"if there is evolution there is no god" is the idea i'm getting when i hear people trying to discuss this topic. there is no coexistence of these ideas for some reason.
@Styxhexenhammer666 If he is invisible how can you know the unicorn is pink.. ohhh hooo..
However, the debates for scientists are basically over.. However, we do not know for a fact.. that is FACT.. that evolution exists. The theory of evolution cannot be proven or disproven (as such right no there are no observable facts to make it as such.) it is however a strong theory that we are not able to completely test for yet. Will we be able to in the years to come. More than likely yes.
@Styxhexenhammer666 There hasn't been enough evidence to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. Science can leave no room for any doubt. Also, there are different theories as to how evolution happened that makes it not completed as a fact yet. It is a theory that will be proven with time. However, right now it hasn't brought full proof on the table.
@Styxhexenhammer666 How can you see the invisible pink unicorn god? If you see it then you don't really believe it.. you know it.. there is a difference there.
@Styxhexenhammer666 do you ever ponder at the idea that so many people who work in fields of scienctific research actually believe in god? even if god did not exist does it hurt you in any way that some people believe he does. if you expect people to respect you belief in no god (the minoirty) you must first respect the beliefs that other people have that there is a god (the majority).
@2superstobie Within the scientific community, most of those who believe in god do some from a deist perspective, certainly not the theism of the fundamentalists. However, you must also see, disbelief in god is also in higher amount among the scientific.
@Styxhexenhammer666 that was not my question if it is so obvious that god does not exist how come so many people including people in the scientific communities: NASA particle science quantum dynamics ect believe in god. you know when we could not explain or prove gravity that did not mean it did not exist. not saying you have to believe in god but i think it is ignorant to dismiss something simply because you cannot prove it.
@2superstobie There was, and is, observable evidence of gravity. There remains none of a god, or gods, or a goddess, or any other intelligent cosmic creative force.
Many more eminent scientists are nonbelievers than are believers. Science teaches us about evolution and genetics and a round earth and an expanding, ancient universe, all things against the biblical account of creation.
@Styxhexenhammer666 i never said there was no evidence of gravity, i just said we could not explain it yet. thank you for demonstrating you lack of critical reading analysis skills. you train of logic suggest what ever scientist think is correct if you lived long ago you would probably have agreed with scientist that the world was flat just because that was what they were teaching. your mind is so closed you have already decided that there could only be one of 2 possible options.
@2superstobie Of course there are many options, but god versus no god is a yes no equation, you never mentioned some other creative cosmic force, you mentioned god.
@Styxhexenhammer666 you never considered the possibility they could coexist as one theory. what if for all you knew there was a god who started the evolutionary process. the point is you don't know.
@evannati I believe God made science so us human beings could have an understanding of everything. What is everything made of? Lets take you for instance. You are a group of millions of atoms put together in a way that makes you, YOU. Air water rock space everything you see or hear or any other sense is an atom. But what made the atom? Thats where th idea of anti-mater comes from, that = the God aspect of things. And Styx is right. You can not prove god exist. Thats why its called belief.
@PyroManiacFagumz I agree with your belief that's what i really like so much about the scientists in the angels and demons book they have a name for that belief i just cannot think of it now. but just because you cannot prove something exists does not mean they do not exist.
you also forgot to mention Ron Paul would also try to eliminate the only proggressive taxation we have, which is the income tax. This country is already in debt and this would bring us even further in the hole, probably forcing many of our government sectors to become privatized! For example, our postal & school systems- i dont want economic and social anarchy!!
@XES101watchclub Spending Spending Spending. His position is to balance the budget by bringing the troops home and cutting unconstitutional programs. They just happen to cost more money than the incom tax brings in.
Ron Paul wants to strip the Supreme Court of Judicial Review, and thereby retroactively undo all legal precedent which regulates state laws at the SCOTUS level in several broad, sweeping categories. Look up his We The People Act. He's submitted it several times to the House.
Ron Paul is not, nor will he ever be POTUS. Get a haircut, get a job where you contribute something to society, and stop posting on youtube. You have no idea what you're talking about.
thanks dude i couldnt have said it myself. i saw the amazing atheist video and i was shocked at his opinion, it seems like he was just looking for something to yell about… much more unfoundedly than the normal...
lmao i am also a black man joing the KKK like your a satanist supporting the christian fundementalist movement... GET THE FUCK OUT HERE WITH THAT SHIT! getting butt hurt over paul when ur ass doesn't even belong to this country
I would disagree strongly with the primary assertion that there is "no cult" of Ron Paul. Primarily, as any given stroll on Mox News or any views of a right-wing nature, will evoke the fair share of "Ron Paul 2012" comments. From my observations, his supporters are among some of the most vociferous people in the 2012 election cycle. Which is sad because he doesn't have much of a chance of winning, even though I love some of his ideas.
The federal govt....is what keeps creationism out of your high school. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION...first amemndment. Ron Paul wants to make it up to the states...WHICH IS AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION...except he dupes the less apt among us by sprinkling the words liberty and freedom into everything.
So glad there is people out there, that understand Ron Paul's Platform. I am against abortion, gay marriage, as well as anti-constitutional legislation. But I understand the Federal Government should have no power over the states (as the states are what unify us, not federal government). Trusting power to the states = UNITY & DIVERSITY.
I'm against both abortion and homosexuality strongly, but I also understand that it's not my place to dictate others lives.
This is what I love the most about Ron Paul's supporters; Most politicians use wedge issues to divide people and make 'em hate eachother, but that tactic doesn't really work in this new paradigm, because in a free society, people can do their own thing and no one group can use government to oppress another. Ron gets love from Atheists, Christians, Satanists, Taoists, etc. and though we all have our differences, we all "grok" the liberty message on a very basic level, and team up to defend it!
errrrrm, The amazing athiest was just saying ron paul has too much attention basically, he wasent saying that if he gets into power he could do anything, so yeah pointless video. derp. also your attention seeking, hence satanist and this video, so yea, stop playing dungeons and dragons, and do something useful
BTW you're Satanism, I respect it, there's two sides of duality in this reality IMO, and people are focused on worshiping one and hating the other. But both are really forces that control our lives, the good and the bad, the ying and the yang as they say.
This is exactly what I'm thinking, but people keep throwing out abortion, gay marriage and evolution and HIS OPINIONS ON THEM. Not his policies. They don't understand the difference between opinion and policy. I have an opinion that coffee is nasty that doesn't mean I'll make a law saying coffee is outlawed.
Isn't it strange how America suddenly changed its mind about Saddam when a terrorist somehow connected with him blew up the world trade center? Strange.
@Styxhexenhammer666 A "satanist" ahahaha.... Check this out Styks. the Iraq War Resolution (formally the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002,[1] Pub.L. 107-243, 116 Stat. 1498, enacted October 16, 2002, H.J.Res. 114) is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No: 107-243, authorizing military action against Iraq.
Congress ought to either declare war and share in the guilt when we make shitty mistakes, or vote against military action and stand up for their constitutionally gifted right to disagree with the now far-too-powerful executive branch.
@Styxhexenhammer That is rhetoric. This was an act authorized by congress. Saying it wasn't is WRONG, it actually a lie to be exact. This protocol has been used since the creation of the United States. Jefferson did it this way, Madison, Adams, Monroe, Buachanon, Wilson, Eisenhower, Kennedy, LBJ, Reagan, and HW Bush. Don't mislead your audience Styx. They are too fucking stupid.
Oh and btw. That wasnt a mistake, we liberated tens of millions of people from a mass murdering fascist dictatorship
@KingDingaLing090 Liberated tens of millions from a mass murdering fascist dictator...
>MFW We supported Saddam Hussein even while he butchered his people, as long as he cooperated and fought the Iranians... who we also previously backed.
And - Is that like a cliche or something? When did we support him while he butchered his people and why did we want to fight the Iranians? Tell me. We can learn from eachother.
You know man, I'm a catholic Ron Paul supporter and even though we disagree on religion I admire your logic. The part in the cult of Ron Paul about him being against separation of church and state was bullshit, ur right. Oh, an the lord still loves you it's not to late to repent :)
Satan was exiled from heaven. Do you really think God would allow him to become powerful? No hell is God's wraith and heaven is God's Goodness. Satan isn't free, he suffering in hell and not running hell.
The old testaments are barbaric and almost nothing alike the new testament. Death was a common punishable action for things we know these days that are "Forgivable if confessed"
Being satanic is so childish. As if its cool to be one. Just like people who think their gangsta
@ProofEqualsFact Satan and Hell and those things, do not exist. So to say "God wouldn't allow Satan to become powerful" makes no sense. It's like saying Santa wouldn't let the Easter bunny become powerful.
Satanism is all about logic, rationality, and science, it has nothing to do with childishness and everything to do with mental responsibility and maturity.
Well done! Make Ron Paul supporters look bad. You worship Satan. Its what you believe. Im fine with that. Now is not the time to say this stuff. Really?
@ianscotthargreaves Just making sure the amazing atheist's supporters didn't assume I was a christian who supported Ron Paul because of, for example, his stance on abortion.
@ianscotthargreaves I think it makes Ron Paul look good that there's a diverse amount of people supporting him. No other candidate have I seen have this kind of diversity supporting him.
Good job. I'm happy you took the time out of your day to tell that guy about his gap in logic. That's it. Not intellect. Just common sense. Thank you for your common sense.
acourding to cathrin austin fitts if ya got rid of the drug cartel everyones pension or mutual funds would be gone.but yea everything would have to be fased out over time like big gov i guess 20 million jobs are gov for all the stupid regulations. ron paul would have to get the most done if he where pres in a short time and alot of people wouldn`t be happy that depend on big gov
I love videos like this because if you elect a constitional canditate you have to support the constitution. It means a way to actually for us to live together constitutionally. We just need more constitutional caditates My personal belief is that he "Amazing Athesist" is just trying to get exposure by making people upset he is just a "troll" trying to sell T-shirts by ticking people off.
John Lennon is that you !
Chansulus 1 week ago
Great video! You should check out mine: "The Tao of Paul"
travisblack85 3 weeks ago
14th Amendment stripped the right of the states to violate the Constitutional Rights of its citizens....to include separation of church and state, or for consenting adults to form a union....or what Derek said Personally I will ever vote for someone who doesn't accept evolution ... Not a religious test, a reality test.
thewildlifer 1 month ago
"I'm not voting for Ron Paul because of [anything you find on some jagoff's blog)."
Marcello777 1 month ago
Great video
americanIDOLfan11111 1 month ago
Your second argument is also flawed on the issue of states rights and gay marriage. If you and Ron Paul are true libertarians, then you should definitively recognize that rights are first and foremost given to individuals, and not states or collectives. This is recognized as a Core Democratic Value known as Minority Rights, and to deny this would means you think that the State Governments cannot be beholden to the Bill of Rights.
Derekrife1 1 month ago
Your first argument is wrong ten seconds in. Not sure if you knew that the current supreme court is split with Anthony Kennedy in the middle, and Ruth Nader Ginsburg is going to retire soon. If she is replaced by a pro-life justice, then there will be a 5-4 majority on that issue, and it could be repealed via amendment, the next Justice will be appointed by the President. So far Obama has appointed 2 pro-choice judges, whereas Paul would not So yeah, you're definitely wrong on that.
Derekrife1 1 month ago
Stopped at "I'm a satanist"
lionislionislion 1 month ago 2
Spot on analysis. I am curious tho. You said that you were a satanist. Assuming you are a libertarian how can you believe in satanism since it harms others. Perhaps we have different definitions of satanism? What is yours?
ltajambi 1 month ago
@ltajambi Satanism harms nobody. The only instance a Satanist harms another is when they are personally attacked by another person.
Libertarianism fits in well with Satanism- it stresses individuality, liberty, and freedom.
Styxhexenhammer666 1 month ago
It doesn't really matter what this guy believes. He still rips TJ a new asshole. I'm an Atheist voting for Ron Paul and so should you!
mrshreder 1 month ago
As an Satanist, do you believe in God? After all, isn't God and Satan all part of the same fable?
RDJim 1 month ago 2
nice
Lotusflowerism 1 month ago
I enjoyed your video. You are well spoken and articulate, and you're prety spot-on. Fuck these close-minded haters, and fuck the "amazing" atheist. The fact that you're a satanist just goes to show how broad Paul's supporters are, because he represents true liberty, and that we're not all fundamentalist Christian nut-bags. You have my support, man. Keep fighting the good fight or whatever.
TheChirpingAssholes 2 months ago
Yeah theamazingatheist is one arrogant son of a bitch. His pride is ever so disgusting/
MrMalcolm900 2 months ago
Lol I read "Re:CLIT of Ron Paul" at first, with my peripheral vision :D
KaiTendo174 2 months ago
Um...I have a question: How are you this fucked in the head? Ron Paul's interpretation of the Constitution is about as ass-backwards as his religious beliefs. Under Ron Paul, we'd have no infrastructure, he'd kill education, throw food and medical regulations under the bus, and he's just a general idiot.
And the media is terrified and he doesn't support corporations? Wants to get rid of the FDA!
And lastly, you have no idea what an ad hominem is.
So piss off.
madnessinmysoul 2 months ago
@madnessinmysoul You are wrong on all fronts.
I think I'd know what an ad hominem argument is, considering I already studied advanced logic and aced it.
Ron Paul supports the constitution as it was meant to be understood, not the candy coated liberal definition which all but ignores the tenth amendment.
The FDA doesn't work! Remember under George Bush when the FDA basically did whatever he said and ignored its job? All these bureaucracies are volatile and useless.
Styxhexenhammer666 2 months ago 2
@Styxhexenhammer666
Argument from authority much? You're still wrong, ad hom attacks are when an argument is attacked due to the character or past of an individual or group rather than its premises. Ron Paul is simply an idiot, but that's not my basis for attacking his arguments, it's just spice added for flavor.
And which 'way it was meant to be understood'? You mean by slave-owning hypocrites? You do realize that there are 3 equally valid schools of constitutional interpretation, right?
madnessinmysoul 1 month ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 Furthermore, the FDA DOES work. Does it work perfectly? Hell fucking no. Does that mean we should abandon it wholeheartedly? No, it means we should FIX IT. You know, there's a bit of a draft in the sealing around my window, I should probably knock it out.
And advanced logic courses tend to skip over informal fallacies as they'd be covered in 101 logic classes.
And once more I'm just going to point out that you clearly have no understanding of constitutional interpretation.
madnessinmysoul 1 month ago
@madnessinmysoul The problem with constitutional interpretation being it is often done in an illogical and almost certainly misinformed manner... Such as when politicians attempt to ban guns... or allow the federal government to regulate drugs.
Styxhexenhammer666 1 month ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 Really? Where in the Constitution does it give us a right to personal ownership of guns? #2 doesn't say anything about individual ownership, though it does mention militias...historical context is sort of needed there.
And drug regulation is implicit in the powers of Congress, either under the interstate commerce clause or in their protection of the general welfare. Of course, regulation and prohibition are two entirely different things.
madnessinmysoul 1 month ago
@madnessinmysoul "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Seems pretty clear to me.
You must be a neoliberal lol.
Styxhexenhammer666 1 month ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 Really? Quote mining the constitution is a bit of a stretch. You cut out half a sentence.
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." <-that's the full quote. The right of the people to keep and bear arms is a clause directing relating to the necessity of a well regulated militia.
And now an appeal to ridicule. You sure you aced that logic class?
madnessinmysoul 1 month ago
@madnessinmysoul Do you know who the militia were back in those days? Private citizen volunteers.
Do you advocate the removal of firearms from the populous? This question pertains to the conversation. Otherwise you seem to be arguing as the devil's advocate.
Styxhexenhammer666 1 month ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 Do you know what the militia is these days? Private citizen volunteers. At least, that's what the National Guard appears to be.
Do you advocate that we give everyone a nuclear weapon? That's about as relevant to the conversation as what you asked me. I advocate heavy regulation on firearms and that we should revise the amendment for the single reason that firearms have changed so drastically since the amendment was written.
madnessinmysoul 1 month ago
This is just wrong. Ron Paul has stated countless of times that he will work for a PRO LIFE policy.
Besides, all ron paul is saying is ""Remove rights that the government have, and let the state have them"". So now, instead of the government deciding what you can and cant do (which Ron Paul supporters say its wrong because its a two wolf one sheep situation) a state can decide what you can and cant do. Its the exact same situation.
gulbirk 2 months ago 2
When you said "I'm a Satanist" I immediately laughed at you and clicked stop.
pl3bian 2 months ago 7
@pl3bian When I read that comment I immediately chuckled at your small mindedness and blocked you.
Styxhexenhammer666 2 months ago 6
@Styxhexenhammer666 You're pretty cool. ;D
KaiTendo174 2 months ago
People need to understand that Religion was only important long ago when we used fairy-tales to explain the gaps left by our once limited understanding of the universe. Religion should be irrelevant at this point, look at other developed countries like Sweden. We shouldn't encourage our children to look for an imaginary deity for answers.
Education leads to rational thought and logical ideas, America's abysmal education system is part of the problem. Religion causes death. Nothing more
WeEatBrainz 2 months ago
Satanism is a diverse group of cults. Not just "I worship SSSSATAN!!!" hah!
AceofDlamonds 2 months ago
I'd say you are the most educated Satanist I've ever seen. Albeit, I am from Mississippi, so the "Satanists" I've here tend to believe in a literal Satan or some God-like entity of evil and are not true Satanists. Anyway, as a Mississippi Catholic, I like many of your videos...especially this one. Peace, brother.
toomuchcaffeinetoday 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Styxhexenhammer666 I feel like you should say that satanists don't worship the devil and instead are more about developing the God in themselves when you mention it so you don't have to put up with idiots like that. I am not religious, I am not atheist but I know a fuckload more about religion than most religious and atheist people do, funny that, annoying that.
RealityBirth 2 months ago
Comment removed
RealityBirth 2 months ago
Looks like John Lennon.
Sylinic 2 months ago
It was also economical to use Jim Crowe laws once upon a time. It was also economical to have monopolies before the Sherman-Clayton Antitrust act which abolished large-scale corporations which squashed small business owners and polluted the political enviornment, which is facing a resurgence of such bad politics, and this was a federal mandate to ensure people's rights and it WORKED up until the neo-cons decided to take advantage of loopholes in the system.
NUTCASE71733 3 months ago
Going through your points, I'll reply.
1) Yes, it's already been decided in the courts. So has slavery and women's rights. Would you support a racist sexist? Personal opinions on these issues matter.
Ron Paul has supported and voted to ban partial-birth abortion in 2000 and 2003. Paul introduced the Sanctity of Life Act of 2005. He does not care about women's rights, and that matters.
I'm not sure why you'd want a state to be allowed to hate gays. Slavery should be left to the states. Nice.
ProudAtheistIndiana 3 months ago
@ProudAtheistIndiana I agree with banning partial birth abortions.
Times are changing, all these social issues are getting more liberalized. Even Mississippi, which is redneck bigot racist central, couldn't get half their population to vote to define life as beginning at conception.
Styxhexenhammer666 3 months ago 4
@Styxhexenhammer666 I'm not saying I wouldn't want to ban partial-birth abortions, but it shows that Paul is a hypocrite on that issue, when he wants the federal government to do it instead of the states.
ProudAtheistIndiana 3 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 Lol...aw come on now. I'll admit, we are redneck...but as far as bigots and racist there are only a few left. That went out of style 20 years ago. I mean, 3 of my great-great grandfathers were confederate soldiers (and I am proud of their service to their country, though I detest both war and slavery). I mean, I took an African-American girl to prom and I heard no complaints. She was definitely the best dressed girl and most awesome dancer there. New Mississippi is new.
toomuchcaffeinetoday 2 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 Because the law in Mississippi would've led to absurd results where things regularly done in processes like in-vitro fertilization would've been considered murder under the proposed law. The law's backers claimed it wouldn't have been used that way, but I trust what the law actually says, not what people tell me about it. Mississippi is NOT getting more liberalized. If anything it's becoming more conservative. I lived there until recently and it's quite apparent.
cremice78 1 month ago
When during the video did TJ mention gay marrige? And second, you're just making all this shit up
JohnAnderssonTV 3 months ago
Your logic is incredibly poor, dude. I am to support Paul even though his beliefs are anathema to me? Just because he won't be do all the crap he would want to do due to constraints on his power? He can appoint SCOTUS judges who WILL overturn Roe V Wade. And "states rights" is just the far right's way of getting their backwards laws enacted in some states. CIVIL RIGHTS ARE A FEDERAL ISSUE.
Dude you have proven AmazingAtheists' points perfectly!! You get a resounding F on your "logic".
bgbreakdown 3 months ago
@bgbreakdown States rights is the law of the constitution, called the 10th Amendment. You get an F for intelligence dip shit.
JMS13579 2 months ago
Very well spoken my friend. peace out.
utarian7 3 months ago
You are absolutely ridiculous! True satanists are atheists.
MrSurfingdreamer 3 months ago
@MrSurfingdreamer Or agnostics. I happen to be an agnostic Satanist. I give little thought to deities since most of the gods and goddesses mankind has invented make no sense.
Styxhexenhammer666 3 months ago
@MrSurfingdreamer You sound like a funnymentalist to me.
TheArcaneSanctum 2 months ago
hes a satanist so what atleast hes not jewish shit!
rnmchl9 3 months ago
6:00...more like he read the comments section of Huffington Post. That's where I go to find the real facts!
T0NNiX 3 months ago
i agree with you. F- what everyone else says.
FreeBeDrug 3 months ago
Nerdy ass satanist.
HammerOvThor 4 months ago
He didn't include any arguments in his video it was just emotional.
magicidiot12345 4 months ago
I bet satan would like to get ahold of this guys butthole.
MrElricStorm 4 months ago
If you're a 'satanist' then you're already a dumbfuck. LOL! No REAL philosophical thinker considers themselves a satanist when it's just another word for other philosophical modes of thought that exist already but just wrapped in an eggroll of pseudo-mystery/magic and self-superiority thinking.
electronicoffee 4 months ago 11
@electronicoffee Your comment shows one thing more than any other: that you have not really studied Satanism!
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
@electronicoffee yes, because, you are so very mature...
BlackMetalWorld 2 months ago
how can you be a satianist?
88pie88 4 months ago
@88pie88 Essentially Satanism means this:
Do what you want, but don't be an asshole to others.
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good insight, Ron Paul 2012
matteo132000 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
santanist means oppeser witch mean u were hardcore Atheist then proper word for santanist is Prometheus witch He was a champion of mankind not the destroyer unlike the unholy father
burningflag43 4 months ago
Comment removed
burningflag43 4 months ago
@burningflag43 lolwat?
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 Ron Paul wants to return to the gold standard. That would essentially halt social and technological progress as the govt would no longer be able to make investments in scientific research and development. The space program, which gave us amazing returns, would never be possible with a gold standard.
Odysseus087 4 months ago
@Odysseus087 HAHA Wow. You're just not too bright are you? And how much investment goes into important technologies like geothermal energy which could essentially eliminate the need for all fossil fuels and be able to power our homes for about a dollar a year with in the next 10 years? How much are they investing in that right now? Because they seem to be able to come up with over 400 billion dollars a year to spend on military.
MatthewPotter8 4 months ago
@MatthewPotter8 So you agree then that Ron Paul is not the answer. The military, police force, and courts are the only things that Ron Paul wants the federal govt to fund. I agree with you that geothermal energy is the future and that the govt should invest in it like they did with the space program. The federal government can accomplish great things when money is spent properly. It happened in the past and can again if we get lobbyists and corporate money out of politics.
Odysseus087 4 months ago
LOL!! Why don't you argu that thought with Truthiracy3?? LOL!!
rewilkins2 4 months ago
@rewilkins2 Ahhh he's just a retarded blowhard with no idea what he's talking about.
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666
Nice video, well articulated! Thanks for tackling this point, a lot of stupid people might shy away from voting for him because of those topics.
paulism1984 4 months ago
Hey brother, i know most satanists are misunderstood. My spiritual beliefs probably differ from yours, but we both agree on ron paul. Most of ron pauls arguments are mathematical, and sensible and hes one of the only knowledgable candidates. So im just happy to see that ppl of all faiths can rally ron paul because no matter what faith we can see consistency and reason. Thanks for your video and peace my friend.
MrBrucelee117 4 months ago
go blow baphomets dick and stop pretending to be smart when you are NOT
LUVMAGNUMGUNS2 4 months ago
"I am a satanist"
stopped watching.
10lettername 4 months ago
@10lettername Seriously
22Mrjsmooth 4 months ago
@22Mrjsmooth
Yes seriously, Is it a shock that I don't value the opinions of people stupid enough to believe in fairy tales?
10lettername 4 months ago
@10lettername just because hes a satanist you should dismiss him besides have you seen christians? they are all hypocrites there pro life, but pro war, how can you sopprt life but allow the murder of innocent people
13xxnetoxx 4 months ago
@13xxnetoxx
Why are you putting words in my mouth? I value the views of Christians as much as I do the views of satanists, which is very little., why do you feel the need to assume things about me to fuel your standpoint? And In terms of my standpoints on war and abortion, I have never mentioned my views on either, so why would you say "how can you support life but allow the murder of innocent people?" when i never mentioned my stand on those topics?
10lettername 4 months ago
If your hair was a little darker & your skin was a little lighter, people might start thinking that Michael Jackson is still alive =)
On a serious note, you can simply say that Mr. Paul works well with the separation of church & state, despite his personal beliefs - which is an indication of the pure liberty he wants to instill in the lives of the people.
bruce21st 4 months ago
all you people hating this guy for being a satanist are the reason why some many people are scared away from christianity and you make me sick.
we live in a country where you (are supposed to) have the freedom of Worship. that snt just for christians and Jews people
4everUSNavy 4 months ago
1) The states are pushing through plenty of laws on abortion, and he would be appointing the judges reviewing those.
2) Federal government and states have and are pushing through laws on homosexual marriage as well, and these are reviewed by same judges.
3) Lack of acceptance of evolution indicates unwillingness to accept the best way we have come up with to come up with answers as close to the truth as achievable.
JustAnotherMutant 4 months ago
I think you got it wrong on the abortion part. Paul said in Liberty Defined that he would work to strip the Supreme Court of authority over abortion (which is a constitutional process) and repeal Roe v. Wade, thus allowing individual states to decide on the matter. So he wouldn't outlaw it, but he would make changes to the status quo.
shamgar001 4 months ago
why are people bashing this guy for choosing to be satanist? remember, this is a free country..with the ability to believe in what you want, as long as you don't bother others. something that Ron Paul believes in. Thanks for this video..you explained things well.
ceasey0xoogurl 4 months ago
Even though I don't agree with what you believe in, I have to say, that a candidate such as Ron paul would be ideal for this country.
barthelmy 4 months ago
wait. why would satanist not want bombing?
JFAINTER88 4 months ago
Damn people have small brains. dislike this video dislike you but they cant explain why.
JFAINTER88 4 months ago
a satanist? xD - what a fucking tool
Petey0707 4 months ago
is this a man or woman?
Petey0707 4 months ago
Im a queer feminist chican@ for Ron Paul. Aint nobody gonna have babies, get married, or lick a lollipop when the dollar is sucked completely under. WAKE UP PEOPLE RON PAUL IS OUR ONLY HOPE!! AND HE AINT NO OBI WAN
BoysForPele1989 4 months ago
The Amazing lard ass Atheist is a fucking moron.
wingnut4427 4 months ago
"if there is evolution there is no god" is the idea i'm getting when i hear people trying to discuss this topic. there is no coexistence of these ideas for some reason.
people are so proud of their disbelief in god lol
evannati 4 months ago
@evannati Both of those debates are basically over. We know for a fact evolution exists. We also have a pretty solid case for their being no god.
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 well even languages evolve. but you're foolish for even suggesting you can prove there's no god.
evannati 4 months ago
@evannati The invisible pink unicorn that only I can see and hear created the universe. I DARE you to try and prove me wrong.
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 Lies! The invisible orange unicorn created the cosmos, can't you see? Heathen, YOU WILL BURN!
Petey0707 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 Can bacteria fully sense and comprehend our existence? What makes you think we would do better with a deity?
If such a being exists, we would not be able to fully sense or comprehend (and would you want to? read some Lovecraft...)
Whether or not someone believes in such a thing is their business.
Rensune 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 Do the cells in your body have the capacity to understand you?
Rensune 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 If he is invisible how can you know the unicorn is pink.. ohhh hooo..
However, the debates for scientists are basically over.. However, we do not know for a fact.. that is FACT.. that evolution exists. The theory of evolution cannot be proven or disproven (as such right no there are no observable facts to make it as such.) it is however a strong theory that we are not able to completely test for yet. Will we be able to in the years to come. More than likely yes.
D34thSetX 4 months ago
@D34thSetX You haven't really studied biology have you? There's a load of observable fact supporting evolution. FACT
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 There hasn't been enough evidence to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. Science can leave no room for any doubt. Also, there are different theories as to how evolution happened that makes it not completed as a fact yet. It is a theory that will be proven with time. However, right now it hasn't brought full proof on the table.
D34thSetX 4 months ago
@D34thSetX I know it is pink because I can see it, you can't because you're a heretical disbeliever in the one true unicorn god.
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 How can you see the invisible pink unicorn god? If you see it then you don't really believe it.. you know it.. there is a difference there.
D34thSetX 4 months ago
Comment removed
progressivenotion 4 months ago
@progressivenotion Exactly what does that mean?
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 do you ever ponder at the idea that so many people who work in fields of scienctific research actually believe in god? even if god did not exist does it hurt you in any way that some people believe he does. if you expect people to respect you belief in no god (the minoirty) you must first respect the beliefs that other people have that there is a god (the majority).
2superstobie 4 months ago
@2superstobie Within the scientific community, most of those who believe in god do some from a deist perspective, certainly not the theism of the fundamentalists. However, you must also see, disbelief in god is also in higher amount among the scientific.
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 that was not my question if it is so obvious that god does not exist how come so many people including people in the scientific communities: NASA particle science quantum dynamics ect believe in god. you know when we could not explain or prove gravity that did not mean it did not exist. not saying you have to believe in god but i think it is ignorant to dismiss something simply because you cannot prove it.
2superstobie 4 months ago
@2superstobie There was, and is, observable evidence of gravity. There remains none of a god, or gods, or a goddess, or any other intelligent cosmic creative force.
Many more eminent scientists are nonbelievers than are believers. Science teaches us about evolution and genetics and a round earth and an expanding, ancient universe, all things against the biblical account of creation.
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 i never said there was no evidence of gravity, i just said we could not explain it yet. thank you for demonstrating you lack of critical reading analysis skills. you train of logic suggest what ever scientist think is correct if you lived long ago you would probably have agreed with scientist that the world was flat just because that was what they were teaching. your mind is so closed you have already decided that there could only be one of 2 possible options.
2superstobie 4 months ago
@2superstobie Of course there are many options, but god versus no god is a yes no equation, you never mentioned some other creative cosmic force, you mentioned god.
Styxhexenhammer666 4 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 you never considered the possibility they could coexist as one theory. what if for all you knew there was a god who started the evolutionary process. the point is you don't know.
2superstobie 4 months ago
you dismissed the possibility that they could coexist together a 3rd option?
2superstobie 4 months ago
@evannati I believe God made science so us human beings could have an understanding of everything. What is everything made of? Lets take you for instance. You are a group of millions of atoms put together in a way that makes you, YOU. Air water rock space everything you see or hear or any other sense is an atom. But what made the atom? Thats where th idea of anti-mater comes from, that = the God aspect of things. And Styx is right. You can not prove god exist. Thats why its called belief.
PyroManiacFagumz 4 months ago
@PyroManiacFagumz well let me just clarify there is DEFINITELY room for coexistence between god and science/evolution as far as im concerned.
evannati 4 months ago
@evannati agreed why can't they both coexist
2superstobie 4 months ago
@PyroManiacFagumz I agree with your belief that's what i really like so much about the scientists in the angels and demons book they have a name for that belief i just cannot think of it now. but just because you cannot prove something exists does not mean they do not exist.
2superstobie 4 months ago
you also forgot to mention Ron Paul would also try to eliminate the only proggressive taxation we have, which is the income tax. This country is already in debt and this would bring us even further in the hole, probably forcing many of our government sectors to become privatized! For example, our postal & school systems- i dont want economic and social anarchy!!
XES101watchclub 4 months ago
@XES101watchclub Spending Spending Spending. His position is to balance the budget by bringing the troops home and cutting unconstitutional programs. They just happen to cost more money than the incom tax brings in.
defftony 4 months ago
@XES101watchclub There won't be anarchy, are you kidding me?
Petey0707 4 months ago
Ron Paul wants to strip the Supreme Court of Judicial Review, and thereby retroactively undo all legal precedent which regulates state laws at the SCOTUS level in several broad, sweeping categories. Look up his We The People Act. He's submitted it several times to the House.
Ron Paul is not, nor will he ever be POTUS. Get a haircut, get a job where you contribute something to society, and stop posting on youtube. You have no idea what you're talking about.
joesherrod 4 months ago
thanks dude i couldnt have said it myself. i saw the amazing atheist video and i was shocked at his opinion, it seems like he was just looking for something to yell about… much more unfoundedly than the normal...
Metalpaved 5 months ago
lmao i am also a black man joing the KKK like your a satanist supporting the christian fundementalist movement... GET THE FUCK OUT HERE WITH THAT SHIT! getting butt hurt over paul when ur ass doesn't even belong to this country
gonzo361 5 months ago
Great vid, keep it up. Most people can't understand Ron Paul because it requires THINKING DEEPER.
LifeLibertyNow 5 months ago
Great video man!
kazoorocketman54 5 months ago
I would disagree strongly with the primary assertion that there is "no cult" of Ron Paul. Primarily, as any given stroll on Mox News or any views of a right-wing nature, will evoke the fair share of "Ron Paul 2012" comments. From my observations, his supporters are among some of the most vociferous people in the 2012 election cycle. Which is sad because he doesn't have much of a chance of winning, even though I love some of his ideas.
viletree 5 months ago
The federal govt....is what keeps creationism out of your high school. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION...first amemndment. Ron Paul wants to make it up to the states...WHICH IS AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION...except he dupes the less apt among us by sprinkling the words liberty and freedom into everything.
ZhugeNaut 5 months ago
ya, ron paul said abortion is fine if it was rape
bassplayer703 5 months ago
Comment removed
bassplayer703 5 months ago
Satanist? In what way?
hanspeterpitsch 5 months ago
queer
claton95 5 months ago
You were spot on most brother save the reason he would shut down gitmo I would argue he is against it because it is a liberty issue.
TheArcaneSanctum 5 months ago
you need a new hair style.
smilelikeyoumeaniit 5 months ago
@smilelikeyoumeaniit Why? lol
Styxhexenhammer666 5 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 no your hair is sexeh keep it.
TheArcaneSanctum 5 months ago
You said it best my friend.
So glad there is people out there, that understand Ron Paul's Platform. I am against abortion, gay marriage, as well as anti-constitutional legislation. But I understand the Federal Government should have no power over the states (as the states are what unify us, not federal government). Trusting power to the states = UNITY & DIVERSITY.
I'm against both abortion and homosexuality strongly, but I also understand that it's not my place to dictate others lives.
FreeMenDieFree 5 months ago
This is what I love the most about Ron Paul's supporters; Most politicians use wedge issues to divide people and make 'em hate eachother, but that tactic doesn't really work in this new paradigm, because in a free society, people can do their own thing and no one group can use government to oppress another. Ron gets love from Atheists, Christians, Satanists, Taoists, etc. and though we all have our differences, we all "grok" the liberty message on a very basic level, and team up to defend it!
RationalDischarge 5 months ago
Fantastic response. I'm fucking sick of the weight people put on a politicians social platform.
fireofsev 5 months ago
errrrrm, The amazing athiest was just saying ron paul has too much attention basically, he wasent saying that if he gets into power he could do anything, so yeah pointless video. derp. also your attention seeking, hence satanist and this video, so yea, stop playing dungeons and dragons, and do something useful
rorylawless1 5 months ago
@rorylawless1 Your use of illogical means to try and attack my video doesn't work.
Next time say something of substance.
Styxhexenhammer666 5 months ago
@rorylawless1 Ooooohhhh, PWNT~!!!
hotfudgemoney 5 months ago
BTW you're Satanism, I respect it, there's two sides of duality in this reality IMO, and people are focused on worshiping one and hating the other. But both are really forces that control our lives, the good and the bad, the ying and the yang as they say.
jebril 5 months ago
This is exactly what I'm thinking, but people keep throwing out abortion, gay marriage and evolution and HIS OPINIONS ON THEM. Not his policies. They don't understand the difference between opinion and policy. I have an opinion that coffee is nasty that doesn't mean I'll make a law saying coffee is outlawed.
jebril 5 months ago
Isn't it strange how America suddenly changed its mind about Saddam when a terrorist somehow connected with him blew up the world trade center? Strange.
retrogamerist 5 months ago
Ron Paul is shit.
Kickmeinmygroind 5 months ago
@Kickmeinmygroind Intelligent!
fireofsev 5 months ago
Ron Paul 2012! The lord still loves you man it's not too late! :)
snakyjake9 5 months ago
@snakyjake9 Fuck the tyrant god of the hebrews in all his evil forms.
Styxhexenhammer666 5 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 A "satanist" ahahaha.... Check this out Styks. the Iraq War Resolution (formally the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002,[1] Pub.L. 107-243, 116 Stat. 1498, enacted October 16, 2002, H.J.Res. 114) is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No: 107-243, authorizing military action against Iraq.
KingDingaLing090 5 months ago
@KingDingaLing090 Not a declaration of war is it? lol.
Congress ought to either declare war and share in the guilt when we make shitty mistakes, or vote against military action and stand up for their constitutionally gifted right to disagree with the now far-too-powerful executive branch.
Styxhexenhammer666 5 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer That is rhetoric. This was an act authorized by congress. Saying it wasn't is WRONG, it actually a lie to be exact. This protocol has been used since the creation of the United States. Jefferson did it this way, Madison, Adams, Monroe, Buachanon, Wilson, Eisenhower, Kennedy, LBJ, Reagan, and HW Bush. Don't mislead your audience Styx. They are too fucking stupid.
Oh and btw. That wasnt a mistake, we liberated tens of millions of people from a mass murdering fascist dictatorship
KingDingaLing090 5 months ago
@KingDingaLing090 Liberated tens of millions from a mass murdering fascist dictator...
>MFW We supported Saddam Hussein even while he butchered his people, as long as he cooperated and fought the Iranians... who we also previously backed.
Styxhexenhammer666 5 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 (different subject)
Yes....
"MFW"? Is that one of those internet acronyms?
And - Is that like a cliche or something? When did we support him while he butchered his people and why did we want to fight the Iranians? Tell me. We can learn from eachother.
KingDingaLing090 5 months ago
@Styxhexenhammer666 Yeah, at least Satanists are honest about being an evil genocidal cult. :)
BlackenShade 5 months ago
You know man, I'm a catholic Ron Paul supporter and even though we disagree on religion I admire your logic. The part in the cult of Ron Paul about him being against separation of church and state was bullshit, ur right. Oh, an the lord still loves you it's not to late to repent :)
snakyjake9 5 months ago
Satan was exiled from heaven. Do you really think God would allow him to become powerful? No hell is God's wraith and heaven is God's Goodness. Satan isn't free, he suffering in hell and not running hell.
The old testaments are barbaric and almost nothing alike the new testament. Death was a common punishable action for things we know these days that are "Forgivable if confessed"
Being satanic is so childish. As if its cool to be one. Just like people who think their gangsta
That's my opinion
ProofEqualsFact 5 months ago
@ProofEqualsFact Satan and Hell and those things, do not exist. So to say "God wouldn't allow Satan to become powerful" makes no sense. It's like saying Santa wouldn't let the Easter bunny become powerful.
Satanism is all about logic, rationality, and science, it has nothing to do with childishness and everything to do with mental responsibility and maturity.
Styxhexenhammer666 5 months ago
"I'm a satanist..."
Stopped watching there.
Epo4871 5 months ago
@Epo4871 poor fundie
Styxhexenhammer666 5 months ago
Well done! Make Ron Paul supporters look bad. You worship Satan. Its what you believe. Im fine with that. Now is not the time to say this stuff. Really?
ianscotthargreaves 5 months ago
@ianscotthargreaves Just making sure the amazing atheist's supporters didn't assume I was a christian who supported Ron Paul because of, for example, his stance on abortion.
Styxhexenhammer666 5 months ago
@ianscotthargreaves I think it makes Ron Paul look good that there's a diverse amount of people supporting him. No other candidate have I seen have this kind of diversity supporting him.
jebril 5 months ago
Keep preaching! Lets hope most Americans have as much common sense as you do!
realist283 5 months ago
Good job. I'm happy you took the time out of your day to tell that guy about his gap in logic. That's it. Not intellect. Just common sense. Thank you for your common sense.
petereberle 6 months ago
acourding to cathrin austin fitts if ya got rid of the drug cartel everyones pension or mutual funds would be gone.but yea everything would have to be fased out over time like big gov i guess 20 million jobs are gov for all the stupid regulations. ron paul would have to get the most done if he where pres in a short time and alot of people wouldn`t be happy that depend on big gov
commando7144 6 months ago
hmmm ok
oxjhan9 6 months ago
I love videos like this because if you elect a constitional canditate you have to support the constitution. It means a way to actually for us to live together constitutionally. We just need more constitutional caditates My personal belief is that he "Amazing Athesist" is just trying to get exposure by making people upset he is just a "troll" trying to sell T-shirts by ticking people off.
biffburroughs 6 months ago
Failed in the first 3 sentences. "I'm a satanist, trololol!"
Fucking tool.
Voojin1 6 months ago
TheAmazingAtheist is a shame to all us normal atheists
blackraider777 6 months ago