@sexking83 Please do explain how it is a "foolish" comment. All my comment is, is stating that the info in this is old, and is no longer factual for the current date. And what nm size we are at at this exact moment.
@jkane94 40 years!!! haha no more like already here lol(actually in 1999) the D-wave that has been in research for 10+ years now is now being sold for $10mil. Now for the residential/public market quantum computing might be 10-15 years away since it is obviously very expensive. More than likely computers will be built as soc's for about 10 years then another socket will be added to motherboards for the QPU and another 5 years we will see it integrated within the cpu as is almost everything else
@goatgoat They already make 3D structures. There are many layers in a modern processor. But remember the more layers there are, the more processes (hundreds at present) are required to make it... and the more processes the bigger the FAB plant needs to be. At some point the FAB plants will be too expensive to build. Also I guess there would be problems with heat if there were too many layers.
@uikonaful Well there is nothing special about 1nm, its just a measurement right. Silicon atoms are about 0.25 nm wide, so obviously you can't make anything smaller than that out of silicon. AFAIK there are other limitations which prevent silicon technology from going any smaller than about 11nm.
not too sure about her saying every single transistor functions. i believe it's quite normal to have bad blocks. it doesn't kill the entire die because the blocks are usually part of an array of the same elements, so they're inherently backed up
@amartinjoe .. and of course ... why?? i cultivate my garden, i read books on art, history, prehistory, study chinese characters and spend lots of time in wide open upland spaces .. oh .. i never fly or travel further than 100 miles ... so..... why??
@amartinjoe .. and of course ... why?? i cultivate my garden, i read books on art, history, prehistory, study chinese characters and spend lots of time in wide open upland spaces .. oh .. i never fly or travel further than 100 miles ... so..... why??
one problem, it's a great idea to make it process more by pitting more transistors but you don't really need to make the physical chip smaller, having more (processing) in the same area is greater than having more (processing) in a smaller area because there will be that extra space to process too
the reason you CANT MAKE IT LARGER ONCE YOU MAKE IT MORE COMPACT is heat, think about it, smaller components = more heat in one area, 2x smaller components = too much friggin heat to radiate out
But if you made the chip bigger, first you'd have a chip the size of a motherboard then you'd have a chip the size of a room then you'd have a chip the size of an office, then the size of a building. Do you get where i'm going with this? Then we'd be going back to computes that were the size of the old tape data machines back in the 80's.
@colinmaharaj Actually, they move almost instantaneously, because electrons only push the ones in front of them, the electromagnetic repulsion of them is extremely fast. The only problem is resistance, and in circuits this small, it's extremely low.
@colinmaharaj The electrons move slow but their march down the conducting channel begins at the speed of light. The electrons at the gate of the transistor on the far end of the chip are "ordered" by the electric signal which travels at the speed of light to march through.
As much as we admire Moore's Law it is still just an evolution of system designed 60 years ago. Doubling the number of transistors doesn't boost preformance much, since most of that falls on multi core systems and cache and some power management systems. ALU, FPU, CU, MMU...work on the "same" principles, on "same" number of MOS devices. Sure you can keep that law alive by making more cores, larger SRAM or DRAM as main memory or FLASH as I/O device...but preformance doesn't follow that law.
Visit the Singularity website and there's a logarithmic graph showing the number of calculations per $1000. It's clearly exponential, which is why I don't agree with your statement: "doubling the number of transistors doesn't boost performance much".
intel are developing a 6 core 32nm chip so wont be long. Amd phenom 2 dont have the power like the intel i7 but will have a better up grade path. you can use a Socket AM3 in a socket AM2/AM2+ mobo, the AM3 has mcc controller for DDR2 and DDR3. only DDR3 if you have a supporting mobo.
amd will always be behind from now on. Intel is a step ahead in its archetechure, so don't even try to compare the i7 to a phenom II. They are in totally different ages. The Phenom II's were amd's first 45nm. So instead of comparing the i7 to Phenom II's compare the phenom to the Core 2 duo and Core 2 Quad, and THEN see what happens.
they not ... Q6600 65nm like Phenom 9950 same price but intel 15% faster .... it makes amd cheap ??? not realy .. and about AMD price .. u wont save much with phenom 9300 and 9950 diference like 50$ thats not saving thats stupidity !
Fifty bucks less actually IS saving money!! :D I also prefer Intel processors because they are much more stable and fast, but AMD processors are cheaper...
there having a problem making better processors now as there trying to make then smaller why don't they make a really small one like a 45nm chiop then add more of those chips and make a bigger processor with loads of small cores
Because you have to have programs that can run on those chips, There currently is almost NO software that usese all of the cores in a core 2 quad, so until programs are coded in order to take the advantage of that there won't be a multi core chip past 4 for wide consumption.
This is absolutely fascinating! I'd love to see more interviews with the people that design cpu's, and some documentaries that delve into the more technical aspects. Great to see that there is at least 1 super nerdy female helping to create this technology too. :D
No its not. And we don't know how "wide" an atom is. We can only use quantum mech to estimate the probability an electron is hovering in a certain point. The ion used to dope the substrate would be the "size" of an "atom". And there's no reason to build so small.
It`s not an american innovation , it`s an international innovation , you go ahead and go to NASA INTEL and Microsoft , and see the procentage of non-americans working there
Biggest change to transistor in 40 years,`yeah sure, but why are your desktop cpus inefficient power drainers Intel hasn't even made a single desktop chip that can idle under 10 watts without that junk speedstep laggy function wich has an unacceptable latency start up problem! speed step makes a pc hang! Why cant you guys just make efficient atom chips and power efficient motherboards for DESKTOPS your quads and duos cost 20$/30$ a month extra doing squat in idle ! whats up with that
Computers are a natural evolutional progression, the storage of data on silicon media and manipulation through logical foundations has advanced over the decades naturally and I do not find it impossible to concieve that humans who are the in there respective fields can collectively create nano technology
Was Einstein helped by Aliens in his calculations and equations? was steven hawking helped by Aliens in his massive intelectual capacity? Humans are more than capable of high levels of advancencement?
I realy don't know if these scientists where helped.Maybe, maybe not.Sory.Can't help you with that. But I know that Einstein was solving his dilemas with a very interesting trick.
Alien theory is interesting. I can't fathom humans being able to conjure this up without help, and then to develop a fab method.... we are living in interesting times for sure!
it is amazing what people can do... they've reached to the points where it is so small... that u won't even be able to tell that is even fabricated. it would look like a normal wafer board.
I don't need and I don't try to proove what I said. I know it and that's enough. The other people needs to stay in the dark and ask for proof.So if you want proof search for it and think.
Of course you need proof.. You cant just make a statement like " I know it and thats enough!!!"
how do you know it? have you experienced something? did you witness something? have you been visited? otherwise you are speculating, based on the idea that humans are not clever enough to do this themselves..
Ok so because I dont kmow everything about a computer means Aliens have visited us? I know a lot.. I know enough.. I study electronics and belive it or not.. it isnt rocket science, manipulating silicon is not like splitting the atom.. its clever chemistry undoubtedly, the zochralsky process is very clever for creating high tollerance of silicon impurity for effective conductance
I see that you question every idea that you cannot accept.That could be a good thing if you could question the right things. If not, it's useless and you become a naive person. Think about that.Why would I lie you?We don't even know each other :)
oh and by the way... the Czochralski process is just a f..king process. You have to know a lot more than that.when these machines appeared the manufacturing process was way different.
Skydiver.. I accept that you would not lie, Ok thats why I am curious about it, but you have to understand.. I can only accept what I see with my own eyes, through my own mind and its reasoning. Its called the scientific method and far from being a 'naive person' I am fairly well grounded.. could you at least give me a clue about why you have come to your conclusions.. you must know something
When is this damn thing being brought out, I mean this is pathetic I might just end up goin for AMD if they take any longer now and im gonna tell my computer illterate buddies of mine to also go with AMD and anyon else I can cuz Intel is really ahead of themselves like TorotoGuy said.
well first lets correct your spelling it is spelt faggot, second by doing simple maths you posted about a month ago the video said they where availale late 2007 over 6 months... So you dumb fuck you just to fucking stupid to even subtract.
I think he was talking about transistors actually in an integrated structure. But even then, the very first IC was indeed a germanium one, made by Jack Kilby in 1958.
Can't wait until they discover the usefulness of elements like Yitrium(Super Conduction at room temperature) in powerful computer systems capable of Artificial Intelligence. Terminator 2
Free energy? Um right. You keep believing that. And what does this video have to do with that? Penryn's main breakthrough is the use of a new transistor materials... Free energy? What?
I never get tired of "Moore's Law" as Tristar10h does. I work in the semiconductor industry and I know how important the concept is to our continued success.
No doubt some MarCom Managers and associated teams of writers and creatives worked to make this a personal as possible, given a variety of challenges, not the least of which is working with engineers rather than actors.
45nm transistors 5 years ago... 22nm trigate transistors today... 11nm in the next 3 years. We are living in exponential times.
uzaiyaro 2 days ago
Why did they stop there Commercials,they had some good ones running for once?
DBSpy1 1 month ago
LOL at the out dated info on this. We are down to 32nm now.
K3Spice 1 month ago
@K3Spice hardware scales down at a marvelous pace, LOL at yourself for making that foolish statement
sexking83 1 month ago
@sexking83 Please do explain how it is a "foolish" comment. All my comment is, is stating that the info in this is old, and is no longer factual for the current date. And what nm size we are at at this exact moment.
K3Spice 1 month ago
@K3Spice of course, this was made in 2007, and yes this video is outdated
sexking83 1 month ago
@sexking83 ... Forgot to add the 100% part to my sentence. I meant to say "and is no longer 100% factual."
K3Spice 1 month ago
smaller they get the faster they get :#
SuperFluffyCarrot 2 months ago
even if they make 32 or 22 nm transistors..They will heat up more quickly.So they have to make more powerfull coolers fot it
Flashanimator10 4 months ago
i think you watch this on 32nm technology period.
turtlecat77 4 months ago 2
Quantum computing is inevitable. It's going to happen within 40 years or so.
jkane94 4 months ago
@jkane94 40 years!!! haha no more like already here lol(actually in 1999) the D-wave that has been in research for 10+ years now is now being sold for $10mil. Now for the residential/public market quantum computing might be 10-15 years away since it is obviously very expensive. More than likely computers will be built as soc's for about 10 years then another socket will be added to motherboards for the QPU and another 5 years we will see it integrated within the cpu as is almost everything else
decimat777 4 months ago
Next they'll make transistors from hyper-cooled hydrogen atoms.
isreasontaboo 6 months ago
big deal, my cheap netbook has a 45nm chip
persevere67 6 months ago
@persevere67 Uploaded by channelintel on Sep 13, 2007
spire107 5 months ago
next generation is going to NANO-ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING. nice video
highsense100 6 months ago
22 nm chips next year :D
CruelAngels 7 months ago
In about 20-30 years, we will have 7nm processes according to Moore's Law.
PatabookG5 7 months ago
Wait till they start using single protons as transistors, a bit of fiction but what if..
cifi10 8 months ago
id like to learn more but its nice and simple
Excuisador 9 months ago
id like to learn more
Excuisador 9 months ago
Next, transistors are going to be a couple atoms in width. IBM has already invented the technology called IBM Nanotechnology.
FREAK9364 11 months ago
Intel, Toshiba and Samsung has joined an alliance to reach the 10nm goal :)
Cursecut3r 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sexykatie90 HAPPY NEW YEARS
sexykatie90 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Narrow Naughty girls and ladies here benaughtyman.info
ranjanikumari 1 year ago
Hello I worked for Intel back 97. Fab11 Rio Rancho. And what I have to say about Itnel...lower management sucks...big winniers.
TzzX78 1 year ago
how about 3billions transistors in AMD radeon ?
frkmybrain 1 year ago
You cant even see all the technology<3
uikonaful 1 year ago
what are they going to do when its 1nm???
uikonaful 1 year ago
@uikonaful make the structure 3d? or use light! :O
goatgoat 1 year ago
@goatgoat They already make 3D structures. There are many layers in a modern processor. But remember the more layers there are, the more processes (hundreds at present) are required to make it... and the more processes the bigger the FAB plant needs to be. At some point the FAB plants will be too expensive to build. Also I guess there would be problems with heat if there were too many layers.
tyebillion 10 months ago
@uikonaful Well there is nothing special about 1nm, its just a measurement right. Silicon atoms are about 0.25 nm wide, so obviously you can't make anything smaller than that out of silicon. AFAIK there are other limitations which prevent silicon technology from going any smaller than about 11nm.
tyebillion 10 months ago
As long as they don't make a laser chip, that would be slow, just a normal mirror photonic 0 nm chip.
zach2408dk 1 year ago
I bought a bag of chips for $2.00
ighforever 1 year ago 2
not too sure about her saying every single transistor functions. i believe it's quite normal to have bad blocks. it doesn't kill the entire die because the blocks are usually part of an array of the same elements, so they're inherently backed up
lexichronicle2 1 year ago
Screw intel. Cyrix all the way!
shortfatandcrass 1 year ago
@shortfatandcrass
i had a cyrix 333MHz in my first self build pc :D
dunnobutwayne 1 year ago
first person to invent a miniterazation ray will then own all things computer chips
zeratul575 1 year ago
32nm exists already
Matty14388 1 year ago
the end comes behind 22nm.... :P
Robosos 1 year ago
screw this.....I'll stick to my typewriter.
amartinjoe 1 year ago
@amartinjoe ... mmm ... i prefer old ways . Paper, pen and my own brain. Good comment bud !
richardyingren 1 year ago
@amartinjoe .. and of course ... why?? i cultivate my garden, i read books on art, history, prehistory, study chinese characters and spend lots of time in wide open upland spaces .. oh .. i never fly or travel further than 100 miles ... so..... why??
richardyingren 1 year ago
@richardyingren You realize he was joking right?
trackster11230 1 year ago
@amartinjoe .. and of course ... why?? i cultivate my garden, i read books on art, history, prehistory, study chinese characters and spend lots of time in wide open upland spaces .. oh .. i never fly or travel further than 100 miles ... so..... why??
richardyingren 1 year ago
@amartinjoe ROFL!! Did you use your typewriter to comment on ths page??
Kaptainess 1 year ago
one problem, it's a great idea to make it process more by pitting more transistors but you don't really need to make the physical chip smaller, having more (processing) in the same area is greater than having more (processing) in a smaller area because there will be that extra space to process too
PsalmsOfPlanets072 1 year ago
yeah but the point is if you have more in a smaller area everything moves faster
like a city vs. the country
takes someone 2 mnutes to get mlk, n the country 10-15 mnutes
smokeymasterjedi 1 year ago
@PsalmsOfPlanets072 one word. "Heat"
psx2p 1 year ago
yess but....we are putting more parts on the same size transistor...which is essentially making it smaller and even morreeee powerfull
nickcars100 1 year ago
Could they grow brain tisue or use the same materials that that uses? Would that have more connections?
hididdlyho82 2 years ago
they must use microscopes while making these small chips! i mean how could they possibly see the cpu parts in such detail without microscopes!
eileenBrain 2 years ago
the reason you CANT MAKE IT LARGER ONCE YOU MAKE IT MORE COMPACT is heat, think about it, smaller components = more heat in one area, 2x smaller components = too much friggin heat to radiate out
myid9876543 2 years ago
i think 2 cpus is a better idea
they will get smaller so more cpus will will be effective also
ankit383 2 years ago
how about doubling the size of the chip?
MarkQP 2 years ago
just make the fucking chip bigger once you cant make it smaller
randomcrazyness 2 years ago
Yeah but then it pumps out a lot of heat and costs more to make
doughnutriot 2 years ago 3
But if you made the chip bigger, first you'd have a chip the size of a motherboard then you'd have a chip the size of a room then you'd have a chip the size of an office, then the size of a building. Do you get where i'm going with this? Then we'd be going back to computes that were the size of the old tape data machines back in the 80's.
Who needs to go backwards?
pfjb123 2 years ago 3
@pfjb123 we do once we cant go smaller
randomcrazyness 2 years ago
then the electrical signals takes a longer time to get accross the chip - making it slower. Remember electrons move at a finite speed.
colinmaharaj 2 years ago 13
@colinmaharaj Actually, they move almost instantaneously, because electrons only push the ones in front of them, the electromagnetic repulsion of them is extremely fast. The only problem is resistance, and in circuits this small, it's extremely low.
Nadrealis 1 year ago
@colinmaharaj the speed of light
mbielchris 1 year ago
@colinmaharaj The electrons move slow but their march down the conducting channel begins at the speed of light. The electrons at the gate of the transistor on the far end of the chip are "ordered" by the electric signal which travels at the speed of light to march through.
yTubeBlowsBigBalls 4 months ago
that sounds sensible!
hididdlyho82 2 years ago
As much as we admire Moore's Law it is still just an evolution of system designed 60 years ago. Doubling the number of transistors doesn't boost preformance much, since most of that falls on multi core systems and cache and some power management systems. ALU, FPU, CU, MMU...work on the "same" principles, on "same" number of MOS devices. Sure you can keep that law alive by making more cores, larger SRAM or DRAM as main memory or FLASH as I/O device...but preformance doesn't follow that law.
darijo203 2 years ago
Visit the Singularity website and there's a logarithmic graph showing the number of calculations per $1000. It's clearly exponential, which is why I don't agree with your statement: "doubling the number of transistors doesn't boost performance much".
sciencectn 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Now Intel has to increase the size of the CPUs soon!
tugfngjfuvj 2 years ago
nah, they're just gonna make them smaller. Next is 32nm
kydoes 2 years ago 28
@kydoes thats for a cpu i think some gpu transistors are 24nm
smacky2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@smacky2 Currently they are mode on 40nm process, "I think" isn't a good source ;)
en.wikipedia org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units
Next in 2011 will be 28nm for GPUs, 22nm for intel CPUs
Seradeool 1 year ago
@kydoes next is probably 1 nm from graphene chips
quangluu96 1 year ago
@kydoes Check out Nanotechnology... so small
Films4You 1 year ago
@kydoes and now is 22nm
Dp153 1 month ago
@kydoes haha look two years after you said this /watch?v=vTJLQuHUYFw&feature=relmfu
lordnivek12 1 month ago
Comment removed
dkthemovie 2 years ago
A consistent growth of technology depending on power, quantity and size.
Dude, you could've searched google, thats all you had to do but now you know.
TOMUGUENRISU 2 years ago
if intel can put 100billion transistor inside a chip, it can be fantastic!
meishongzai 2 years ago
Moore's Law works about every two years.
It's been about two years since this video was posted.
imeternallyawesome 2 years ago 3
intel sure showed them
Deimos1993 2 years ago
impressive, most impressive.
TGGeko 2 years ago
she's funny. Yea i think i can belive it!
PeaceAndJustice357 2 years ago
seems that they dont deliver as much as processing capability to the user.. as it supposely they have..
"wtf why?"
authmaax 2 years ago
because YOU can't pay for it. High end users like businesses and scientists use this stuff.
TGGeko 2 years ago
yeah... spitefulness "has a price too"
about the processor...
from engineering perspective, i guess that MOTHerboards and memory eat a bit of the performance, without ever been noticed LOL
authmaax 2 years ago
damn this bitch is on fire! "EVERY SINGLE ONE!!!"
nycpntr 2 years ago 4
Yea the new 32nm westmere processors are coming in november this year, super processors intel is the best.
neo8183899 2 years ago 2
intel are developing a 6 core 32nm chip so wont be long. Amd phenom 2 dont have the power like the intel i7 but will have a better up grade path. you can use a Socket AM3 in a socket AM2/AM2+ mobo, the AM3 has mcc controller for DDR2 and DDR3. only DDR3 if you have a supporting mobo.
huskybites 2 years ago
amd will always be behind from now on. Intel is a step ahead in its archetechure, so don't even try to compare the i7 to a phenom II. They are in totally different ages. The Phenom II's were amd's first 45nm. So instead of comparing the i7 to Phenom II's compare the phenom to the Core 2 duo and Core 2 Quad, and THEN see what happens.
bender3445 2 years ago
whats the music in the beginning???
dummkopf26 2 years ago
shit dummkopf, it's called shit
Idontwantanaccountok 2 years ago
What ALBUMM!!! I know its Shit by Shit but what CD name is it?!?!?!
dummkopf26 2 years ago
32nm Core i7's are coming out this year
anotherone10 2 years ago
PROUD TO HAVE MY 4NM Q9450 :)
NOMADLEON 3 years ago
I got q9550 lol
jaju123456 2 years ago
LOL, we dont need extremes do we XD
NOMADLEON 2 years ago
You guys do not know enough science to appreciate this...
dipper64 3 years ago
AMD is just going through a rough patch these few years, they'll step it up within the next 2 years.
Ye7ia07 3 years ago
freakin 8-core server processors. Good God
chazum0 3 years ago
My god. Intel is going to create chips that think for themselves and they are gonna kill us all. But still holy crap!!! 45nm ftw
GridTec 3 years ago
LOL.. "thats my humorous answer"
devkamal 3 years ago
Interesting indeed, but for me personally I prefer AMD cpu's because they tend to provide comparable performance at considerable cost savings.
x7718 3 years ago
they not ... Q6600 65nm like Phenom 9950 same price but intel 15% faster .... it makes amd cheap ??? not realy .. and about AMD price .. u wont save much with phenom 9300 and 9950 diference like 50$ thats not saving thats stupidity !
taurus1337 3 years ago
Fifty bucks less actually IS saving money!! :D I also prefer Intel processors because they are much more stable and fast, but AMD processors are cheaper...
DarioTheRadioStar 3 years ago
its a 50 dollar saving u said it urself, this is why youl never work fot intel
raikkonen85 3 years ago
Chipper they say, that's a lie more Intel propaganda.
AtiCrossfireX 3 years ago
there having a problem making better processors now as there trying to make then smaller why don't they make a really small one like a 45nm chiop then add more of those chips and make a bigger processor with loads of small cores
hudders123 3 years ago
Because you have to have programs that can run on those chips, There currently is almost NO software that usese all of the cores in a core 2 quad, so until programs are coded in order to take the advantage of that there won't be a multi core chip past 4 for wide consumption.
Siceone 3 years ago
or u just get two quad cores which is 8 cores
PBMS123 3 years ago
i prefer amd
gamer2502 3 years ago
Intel is french for those who didnt know
MXhm91 3 years ago
Nonsense.
HiAdrian 3 years ago 2
it's true whatever you like it or not
MXhm91 3 years ago
And your source is?
HiAdrian 3 years ago
intel means intelligence genius
Besmerched 3 years ago
and where does genius come in since there is no G in intel
MXhm91 3 years ago
and intel doesn't mean that... it means intel= information/source
MXhm91 3 years ago
lol it means INTegrated ELectronics
INTEL
and its american french idiot
Peugeot is french
Gellande 3 years ago
peugeot and citroen is french
both are awful cars, for scrapyard
Intel is american
Gellande 3 years ago
This is absolutely fascinating! I'd love to see more interviews with the people that design cpu's, and some documentaries that delve into the more technical aspects. Great to see that there is at least 1 super nerdy female helping to create this technology too. :D
angryDAnerd 3 years ago
is it possible to make 1 atom wide transistors?
qpwnsall 3 years ago
@qpwnsall,
No its not. And we don't know how "wide" an atom is. We can only use quantum mech to estimate the probability an electron is hovering in a certain point. The ion used to dope the substrate would be the "size" of an "atom". And there's no reason to build so small.
ChipProcessor32 3 years ago
It`s not an american innovation , it`s an international innovation , you go ahead and go to NASA INTEL and Microsoft , and see the procentage of non-americans working there
rampagerampage 3 years ago
Good ole american innovation.
mchou2002 3 years ago
amazing great job intel
87655788 3 years ago 2
useful for my student. thankyou
thiaguwinid 3 years ago 3
Biggest change to transistor in 40 years,`yeah sure, but why are your desktop cpus inefficient power drainers Intel hasn't even made a single desktop chip that can idle under 10 watts without that junk speedstep laggy function wich has an unacceptable latency start up problem! speed step makes a pc hang! Why cant you guys just make efficient atom chips and power efficient motherboards for DESKTOPS your quads and duos cost 20$/30$ a month extra doing squat in idle ! whats up with that
pcwizardz 3 years ago 2
yeh im busy too maybe later.. thanks for your time
doybhoy 3 years ago
Computers are a natural evolutional progression, the storage of data on silicon media and manipulation through logical foundations has advanced over the decades naturally and I do not find it impossible to concieve that humans who are the in there respective fields can collectively create nano technology
doybhoy 3 years ago
Was Einstein helped by Aliens in his calculations and equations? was steven hawking helped by Aliens in his massive intelectual capacity? Humans are more than capable of high levels of advancencement?
doybhoy 3 years ago
I realy don't know if these scientists where helped.Maybe, maybe not.Sory.Can't help you with that. But I know that Einstein was solving his dilemas with a very interesting trick.
SkyDiver17 3 years ago
Alien theory is interesting. I can't fathom humans being able to conjure this up without help, and then to develop a fab method.... we are living in interesting times for sure!
mootness 3 years ago
itziy bitziy
0987654321anon 3 years ago 2
it is amazing what people can do... they've reached to the points where it is so small... that u won't even be able to tell that is even fabricated. it would look like a normal wafer board.
45nm is amazing!
intel and amd is using a 45nm fab in shanghai
I NEED A JOB!
eliden 3 years ago
Intel is not using a 45nm Fab in Shanghai.
The only currently functional 45nm Intel plants are D1D facility in Oregon, and FAB 32 in Arizona.
macmtl 3 years ago
Need to come up with memory and memory bus runs at a 1:1 speed with the processor next.
TechManFFFF 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
CAN YOU BELIEVE HUMANS CAN DO THAT?
Jeez woman, do you wake up supirsed you can breathe?
lollipop2kewl 3 years ago
in order to really appreciate it you probably should know more about it...
a87fhj 3 years ago
humans did not invented the PC. It's alien technology that entered our lives in the WW2.You realy need to learn more.
SkyDiver17 3 years ago
and your proof is?
doybhoy 3 years ago
I don't need and I don't try to proove what I said. I know it and that's enough. The other people needs to stay in the dark and ask for proof.So if you want proof search for it and think.
SkyDiver17 3 years ago
And I want more tumbs down please.
SkyDiver17 3 years ago
Of course you need proof.. You cant just make a statement like " I know it and thats enough!!!"
how do you know it? have you experienced something? did you witness something? have you been visited? otherwise you are speculating, based on the idea that humans are not clever enough to do this themselves..
doybhoy 3 years ago 4
do you know every thing that can be known about a computer?when you will you will understand. and if not I have nothing more to say.
SkyDiver17 3 years ago
Ok so because I dont kmow everything about a computer means Aliens have visited us? I know a lot.. I know enough.. I study electronics and belive it or not.. it isnt rocket science, manipulating silicon is not like splitting the atom.. its clever chemistry undoubtedly, the zochralsky process is very clever for creating high tollerance of silicon impurity for effective conductance
doybhoy 3 years ago
I see that you question every idea that you cannot accept.That could be a good thing if you could question the right things. If not, it's useless and you become a naive person. Think about that.Why would I lie you?We don't even know each other :)
oh and by the way... the Czochralski process is just a f..king process. You have to know a lot more than that.when these machines appeared the manufacturing process was way different.
SkyDiver17 3 years ago
I say what I say after a lot of research.If you want to talk more about it we can use the Youtube mail but right now I'm busy for an hour.
SkyDiver17 3 years ago
Skydiver.. I accept that you would not lie, Ok thats why I am curious about it, but you have to understand.. I can only accept what I see with my own eyes, through my own mind and its reasoning. Its called the scientific method and far from being a 'naive person' I am fairly well grounded.. could you at least give me a clue about why you have come to your conclusions.. you must know something
doybhoy 3 years ago 2
ok I will write you a message in an 2 hours
SkyDiver17 3 years ago
How long has Intel been regurgitating the 8086 platform? GIVE US SOMETHING NEW INTEL!!!!!!!
enigma067 3 years ago
its alredy out here in sweden
charbelbardavud 4 years ago
When is this damn thing being brought out, I mean this is pathetic I might just end up goin for AMD if they take any longer now and im gonna tell my computer illterate buddies of mine to also go with AMD and anyon else I can cuz Intel is really ahead of themselves like TorotoGuy said.
howsitgoinppl 4 years ago
It is already out, how stupid are you...
seveprim 3 years ago 3
lolll, u might wanna check the date I posted u fagget
howsitgoinppl 3 years ago
well first lets correct your spelling it is spelt faggot, second by doing simple maths you posted about a month ago the video said they where availale late 2007 over 6 months... So you dumb fuck you just to fucking stupid to even subtract.
seveprim 3 years ago
Listen u little monkey, lets get this straight, FaggET, those dates were rumours, so now I suggest you get the fuck outta here.
howsitgoinppl 3 years ago
no u
They are out and have been for ages
danharibo 3 years ago
...that woman has balls of steel, actually. It might not sound nice to hear or say, but that's what it is.
samoht1977 4 years ago
Ppl need to stop suckng Intel's dick cuz their getting ahead of themselves.
ToRoNtOGuYY 4 years ago
i agree
all intel really has is money..
their technology is outdated..but they do it anyway..
cunfyoosed 4 years ago
Man hope AMD comes back cause they are wayyy too behind. No competition means no advancements and competitiveness in the field.
mortal1ty 4 years ago
1st trannys 'relatively large'--lol!!! its on wiki at nearly about a foot tall.
MrTeaB 4 years ago
The first transistors were made in the late 40s and they were GERMANIUM not silicon.
Lets get the info straight here. LOL
psikeyhackr 4 years ago
I think he was talking about transistors actually in an integrated structure. But even then, the very first IC was indeed a germanium one, made by Jack Kilby in 1958.
madamerotten 3 years ago
and Robert Noyce.
cchderrick 3 years ago
Holy crap, were there.
UserIsAnFBIAgent 4 years ago
Can't wait until they discover the usefulness of elements like Yitrium(Super Conduction at room temperature) in powerful computer systems capable of Artificial Intelligence. Terminator 2
rbolo29 4 years ago
Ha yet we can't even figure out how to force the federal government and corporations to introduce free energy...this is just ridiculous...
XTCinmee 4 years ago
Free energy? Um right. You keep believing that. And what does this video have to do with that? Penryn's main breakthrough is the use of a new transistor materials... Free energy? What?
Estexan07 4 years ago
well... maybe not "free energy"... but water-powered cars are a possibility. watch?v=SHXw1QkqV9w
planetforsale 4 years ago
actually yes i guess it could be "free energy"
planetforsale 4 years ago
and AMD get further behind in the race for technological superiority
mogFX 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ive seen better.
Torrenza 4 years ago
I'm getting sick and tire of listening to "Moore's Law". Its rate of citation is also increase exponentially at a rate of doubling every 18 months.
Tristar10h 4 years ago
I never get tired of "Moore's Law" as Tristar10h does. I work in the semiconductor industry and I know how important the concept is to our continued success.
SemiGuyBoise 4 years ago 6
This needs to be tightened by a more artistic PR agency.
TayZonday 4 years ago
I have to disagree with TayZonday's comment from a month ago.
This is a very effective video. and does not seem pompous.
And this is not PR it is Marketing Communications, PR agencies and PR folks don't do this sort of work.
SemiGuyBoise 4 years ago
No doubt some MarCom Managers and associated teams of writers and creatives worked to make this a personal as possible, given a variety of challenges, not the least of which is working with engineers rather than actors.
SemiGuyBoise 4 years ago
Teenie-Weenie.
subordinary 4 years ago