@SmoKeeNReZo Now your just being stupid, No wonder you Americans are easy to take the piss out of!! Ali G got his first show on channel 4 here in the UK in 2000, where it invited guest onto his show for interviews plus he showed the videos of other interviews like the one above to an audience who attended his show.. Get it??
Everyone needs to be anti-gun! If you want a gun, join the army idiot. What we don't need are untrained, trigger happy civilians out there just waiting to use a gun during a violent conflict. If you morons want to carry a gun, join the police or armed forces. You see how effective carry a firearms is, violent crime is at an all time high. Civilians have NO justification for carrying any firearms. All this does is strokes their egos and makes them WANT to get involved in violent confrontations.
Some woman in Oklahoma just defended herself and her baby against a home invader by SHOOTING HIM DEAD. What do the anti-gun fags have to say about that? Should she have let the guy rape her instead?
@Edgehead10075 You're a primary example of a red neck. Shooting the burglar? No country elsewhere does so, and we manage. I have been shooting loads of guns, but keeping it in your home as an acessory is just sick.
People keep it in their homes for protection, MORON. There's nothing wrong with that. Are you actually arguing that that woman in Oklahoma should have done nothing and let those scumbags possibly kill her and her baby? IDIOT.
BTW, I'm not a redneck. Simply believing in the right to bear arms doesn't make one a "redneck."
@youdontunderstand He has a point, behind all the parlamentary BS it is still a monarchy, the same one that oppresed that guys ancestors before the revolution.
I'm not a gun nut, but if you make guns illegal then the only people with guns will be the criminals. Crack is illegal but it doesn't stop people from getting it if they want it.
@Kingofprinces85 Okay, so individuals in Iran should be able to build nuclear weapons, or folks over here should be able to own stinger missiles with stinger launchers. RPG's should also be widely available.
Their comes a point in which you widen the net, or chance, of nefarious things happening when you make more and more powerful weapons widely available. I just don't understand why anyone would want automatic weapons available; the weapons were created to kill other humans
@Seedofwinter The point however is should the government be the one telling you what amount of force is necessary to protect yourself. If a private company manufactures rpgs they should be allowed to sell them to the public. Likelihood is the company will realize selling rpgs may not be great PR so lets not do that. The free market not the govt should put a cap on the amount of force a person can use.
@Seedofwinter Hiya, sorry to butt into the conversation..
"I just don't understand why anyone would want automatic weapons available; the weapons were created to kill other humans.."
I hear that loud & clear, but this is reality.. the guns are out there, & I do have the right to protect myself, so I'd rather be proactive than reactive.. How bout this,.. give me the credit for obeying the laws, & not punish me due to those who don't,.. when it comes to "My Personal Defence".. its my right..
@Kingofprinces85 It was the government that gave them that right in the first place, initially meant for protection against the Federal government. Why do you need guns? to protect yourself from...well... people who have been allowed guns? yeah, makes sense. Although, in fairness, changing the law now would, apart from angering hillbillies, not change much in the gang culture, people would still get guns. But thats just due to America's obsessed culture with guns...
Also, are you American out of curiosity? I will respect your opinions as your own regardless of whether or not I believe them to be right, but some sort of evidence to back up your points would be nice (this tends to be a large part of debates)
You sound frustrated that you can't see your opponents and shoot them with your rocket launcher.
Columbine.
How many people would be dead if those chumps were carrying lethal knives instead of automatic weapons? They might have taken 2 or 3 down before being overpowered ...
,,, instead of the carnage we got
It's easy - if you make firearms freely available, then any nutcase can easily find a way to own one - it may be somebody who was once sane, bought a gun, then flipped.
Countless human beings have been killed in human history. But the indisputable fact remains that not one of them was ever killed by a gun. They were killed by other human beings.
This is a critical conceptual distinction. And it is precisely why those determined to deprive others of the means to defend themselves persist in their misleading formulation.
@thechinadesk NO. The human may have pulled the trigger, but if there wasnt such a mad gun culture in America and guns werent so easily available, then they wouldnt have the trigger to pull in the first place and there would be 75,000 (as my last comment said) less deaths/injuries PER ANUM. That is a crazy amount, to put it in context: there were 3,000 victims in 9/11, a tragedy by any stretch of the imagination, but does it not bother you that 75,000 people are victims of gun attacks in the US?
Isn't it interesting? Gun prohibitionists say they want to ban the private ownership of guns, out of respect for human life.
But then the very next moment they demonstrate how little respect they have for other human beings who dare to challenge their views on firearms ownership.
The law states that if a reasonable person would consider lethal force necessary, it is legal. That is OBVIOUSLY the context in which everybody is talking here. If a guy tried to rape a woman, you'd probably say that she should let him rape her.
Feminists ARE crazy. They support allowing women to kill the unborn, who pose no threat.
Anything will get in2 a criminal's hands when needed. He or she will go the extra mile 2 make their weapons (like they do in jail or breaking a glass bottle), buy it in a legal or illegal manner, so why should you disarm the general public? What's the difference between a cop w/ a gun & a good citizen? NOTHING!
In fact, from an investigator's point of view, using guns instead of elaborate ways of killing makes the investigation much easier, quicker & easier to deliver justice to the criminal
The US has the highest murde rates among all western countries... Your theory makes sense, but when you make a comparative statistical study you will see that countries with strict gun control have much less violence and crime than the US. hence your theory is flawed:)
Liberals contradict themselves a lot. Liberals CORRECTLY point out that the war on drugs doesn't stop people from obtaining drugs, yet they think that banning guns will mean that nobody will possess guns. Why is that?
america isnt switzerland. wayyy more crazier people here. and of course, small dick conservatives who wanna argue about everything their fat ignorant fathers taught them. anyway. ali g is the shit. lol
Guns protect lives in the right hands, if they are outlawed, the criminals will still have them cause thats what a criminal is, someone who ignores the law.
@kirked007 Your question sums up my point exactly!. People outside America in developed countries cannot understand USA citizens obsession with guns. Why do people in the USA want to carry guns?
@Edgehead10075 Isn't that just the point?, you need a gun to protect you from other people with guns. I live in Britain, whilst it is by no means perfect here it is incredibly rare to have gun crime. Posession of a gun will automatically mean a prison sentence.
The point is that criminals will carry guns even if guns are banned, though. I don't agree that owning a gun for protection should give you a prison sentence.
Women and other physically vulnerable individuals have the right to resort to technology, including firearms, to defend their persons and their property.
They have the right to carry with them such devices, to be used in the event a physically more powerful aggressor attempts to rob, rape, or murder them.
NO ONE has the right to disarm them, and leave them easy marks for muscular and ruthless career criminals.
@thechinadesk Stupidest comment on youtube. You really didn't think this through did you? Women can take care of themselves. If they are confronted by a MUSCULAR & RUTHLES CAREER CRIMINAL he would take the gun away from the bitch and shoot her. Do you hate men? Were you abused, raped? Either way you are a dumbass. This s a comedy sketch!
@thechinadesk And what does it speak? Did you forget what you were going to say about my comment? I don't get why women should be able to have guns but men cannot & why you chose an Ali G COMEDY clip to make some sort of feminist political statement. You go on this "women are victims & targets" rant to excuse a woman if she kills a man w/a gun. How are women physically vulnerable? I know many very fit, strong women who can do just about anything they want & do not consider themselves vulnerable.
@thechinadesk There wouldn't be nearly as many "career criminals" if they didn't have the means by which they commit the crimes. Think about it.
USA (legalized guns)-75,000 gunshot injuries in year 2000
UK (not legalized)- 3,000 gunshot injuries in year 2000
US has roughly 5 times the population of UK, so if you times the UK figure by five you are still only at 15,000 (compared to 75,000). That is 60,000 injuries/deaths as a result of legalized firearms and a 'gun culture'. sit down, shut up.
@dude444666444 agreed. All counties have problems, UK is not exempt from that... But the gun violence totally exacerbates the situation. see the stats I gave to "the china desk" earlier.
@chilledification Injuries may be higher but the murder rate is the same in the two countries. The only difference is that in the uk you would suffer a slow and painful death.
@AlexanderMazarakis The murder rate is not the same in the two countries... UK was 651 (although stats vary) in 2008. In the USA it was 14,748 in 2010. Even if you take into account the population difference and times UK's by 5... you still get no where near it. ALSO, are you seriously basing your argument on the fact that guns are a good thing because you die quicker? despite the fact that many many more people would die with guns introduced?
@chilledification most of those "gunshot" injuries were caused by CRIMINALS with ILLEGALLY obtained firearms. Meaning those injuries would have been caused even if guns were illegal because criminals would have obtained them anyway!
@chilledification In th UK where guns are not legal then how did 3000 gunshot injuries happen? Guns need to be legal I will protect myself if someone breaks into my house.
@chilledification I never knew that the eighty million plus legal gun owners in the U.S, including myself, ever used a gun in a crime, or ever committed a crime at all. I have never committed a crime, and eighty million gun owners shot no one today.
........Besides, guns are used in self defense, which is why that number is so high. One other reason that number is high is because 95-99% of that number is gang on gang, so good reddens.
Their would not be as many "career criminals" if the justice system worked the way it should, or if more people carried and defended themselves from those scum.
well, firearms also account for less than 10 percent of ur murders. u European savages prefer to cut each other to pieces with knives. personally, I'd rather be gunned down than stabbed to death. much less painful.
I understand that u've been brainwashed by ur government to hate anything that would allow u to defend ur rights from them, but u fucking idiots let the government put cameras IN YOUR HOMES. that makes u so fucking stupid that u don't get to tell us shit about shit
@CarbineKingClassic your ignorance knows no bounds. We don't have cameras in our homes. All I am saying is that so many people are killed in America due to legalized guns, but it's something inherently wrong with the culture. Canada have legalized guns, but a far smaller % of people die from guns. I don't have the answer, maybe it's the poverty levels. A ban now on guns wouldn't help,the criminals would keep guns, and others left defenseless. But its a shame it got to that in the first place.
I disagree. ppl r killed in our country because the same government that wishes to take our guns has historically excluded ppl from mainstream society by subjugating them to inner city slums, creating black markets through drug prohibition, and introducing crack into our black communities. it's not something wrong with the culture, it's the political establishment creating problems so that they'll hav an excuse to enact totalitarian laws. and yes, ur government does do that. i just looked it up
@JoeCaliforniah Is that an NRA propaganda slogan by any chance? Nice... well I suppose nuclear bombs don't kill anyone do they then? I think you'll find they do. I agree, it is the person's choice to pull the trigger most of the time, but they wouldn't have a gun to fire in the first place without legalized guns. Similarly, it was a person who dropped the two Atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but if they didn't have the bomb in the first place, those people wouldn't have been killed.
@chilledification You ban gun, u think it solves the problem? u must be an idiot then. People is good at problem solving, as long as the intention is there, people will always come up with other means. Gun is never the problem.
@JoeCaliforniah look at my earlier posts, I think America can't ban guns now, only the criminals will be left with guns. I think its something wrong with the culture, or poverty levels, I don't know. Im just saying that its a shame the US has got to the stage where everyone needs MAD (mutually assured destruction), what I mean is people have guns, to protect from other people with guns... if guns werent so promoted in the first place then maybe it wouldnt be as big a problem.
@chilledification LOL yeah how many of those criminals use legal guns? I highly doubt US criminals walk into gunshops and buy a gun with a bad record. A US FBI investigation found that only 2% of crimes are committed with legally registered guns. Face it even if you banned guns they're still there on the black market. Wait arent drugs illegal too? But yet they're somehow still on the street. But there is a difference between drugs and guns, and that is you cant grow guns :P.
You make an arbitrary comparison between 2 countries and then pompously claim that it is the gospel truth? Get off your high horse.......what other evidence do you have to present besides your know it all hypothesis?
@MeLoveIsrael Im not on a high horse. Im not even suggesting that the US can ban guns, that would be absurd. All im saying is there is a bit of an issue with the gun culture in the US. Arbitrary implies that the figures are redundant, which they are not.
@arlingtonhynes At what point did I imply that statement? Stop putting words in my mouth, and actually go and read the rest of what I have said to understand what my point is you ignorant cretin
@thechinadesk Hey we aren't physically vulnerable. Some are not as strong as men and some are as strong. Not all criminals are muscular either but if they were then normal men are physically vulnerable too.
True. It was a statistical generalization. My point was that no one has the right to deprive women of the right to defend themselves, by whatever means women see fit.
During the Paleolithic Era, males routinely did whatever they wished to women they encountered. With the invention of firearms, any woman who has the strength to pull a trigger, can prevent a male predator from overpowering her.
You have the natural right (Google "natural rights theory") to protect your own life against those who would take it from you.
Relinquishing that right to "duly authorized law enforcement officials" may sound judicious and "Solomonic."
But since 9/11, incidents such as the Amadou Diallo shooting have become increasingly common. If you recall, NYPD cops fired 41 rounds at an UNARMED immigrant from Guineau.
If you want to depend on mace or a taser (not tazzer), you have the right to do so.
You do not have the right to forbid others to defend their own lives with other means. Their lives are theirs. They don't belong to you. It's simply not your call.
That's the meaning of the term "individual rights." They belong to the individual, not to self-appointed spokesmen for "society as a whole."
@thechinadesk If you read my whole response you wouldn't have given such a banal response. Obviously a gun is better for killing people than a taser or pepper spray etc. But the consequences of having those guns in society far outweigh the positives. If you could please give me a worthwhile response to my previous comments based on all the statistics I would very much appreciate it, you have obviously decided to pick out a minor part of my argument and ignore the facts in front of you.
Someone who feels justified deciding for others whether they may own and use firearms to defend themselves, presumes to speak for "society." He feels justified deciding for others what is "banal" as opposed to cogent, whether the negatives outweigh the "positives," and what is "minor" as opposed to "worthwhile."
Actually, the most glaring fact being ignored, is the fact that other people are not obligated to see things the way you do, and you find that intolerable.
@thechinadesk Thats because the way you see things is illogical, so yes, please do excuse me for believing that in 2007 12,632 people were killed by guns in the US. Yet in whole of Iraq up to 2010, 4,404 US soldiers had been killed. The facts stand out, in one year there were 3 TIMES as many murders than in Iraq. I have not done this to marginalize the work of the US soldiers, they have given their lives, this merely highlights the flaws in US society, and the guns exacerbate the situation.
@thechinadesk you've already used this response... please read my response to it. Also, rather than merely complaining about how I try to 'speak for a nation', please can you directly give a response to the facts I have put infront of you, and no, I do not want any faint, half-hearted waffly response as your last several have been.
You realize that your call to disarm individuals who are incapable of defending themselves with their bare hands is morally indefensible.
So in desperation, you attempt to play a numbers game. But a defender of the right to keep and bear arms refuses to take the bait. So you try to put your own spin on your evasiveness. You allege "faint, half-hearted, waffly."
Maybe it'll work. But I doubt it.
Me, I think I'll "sit down. shut up." I've made my point.
@thechinadesk Is it not morally indefensible to arm criminals with guns?? You dismiss the FACTS as a 'numbers game', but the numbers don't lie. It is not a 'bait' to catch you out, rather the proof is in the facts. I used the phrase "faint, half-hearted waffly" for your previous responses, because, if you re read them, none of them actually act as an answer of some sort, they are irrelevant jibes on how I try to "speak for a nation" (at no point did I say so, I put across my opinions as my own)
sure they have but i think you know what i mean ... another boat might carry a gun so you have to protect yourself from being shot at by another boat ? :D
True, but a guy who's intent on doing harm to others is going to carry a gun even if it's illegal to do so. I wouldn't worry about another boater who has a gun for protection.
A good handgun in the hand of a 5'-5" 90 lb. woman, alone in her home late at night, can protect her against being raped, murdered, and dismembered by a 6'-5" 290 lb. intruder.
Take away her gun, and she would have to defend herself with her bare hands.
How can anyone who insists on banning guns claim to have a heart?
yeah right ... all of the guncrimes/murders in the usa are just people who tried to defend themselfs. thank god they were armed otherwise they might would have been shot :D get it ?
You didn't answer the question. You ducked it by changing the subject, and by adopting a snide attitude, hoping no one would notice you that you have no morally plausible response.
Bottom line? The woman in my example has a right to defend herself.
blah blah blah ... :D its not about ur little example. what are you trying to prove with it anyway? makes no sense and sounds very paranoid... look at the facts and try to think logical. expand ur horizon. (...wont reply to ur answer if u write one btw. arguing with ppl on youtube is too boring. dont take it personal)
"Gee, I don't know how to respond, so I'll just bluster some and walk away, hoping no one notices I was afraid to debate fundamental moral principles, natural rights, and political liberty."
@thechinadesk A good handgun in the hands of a small child who takes it out of his fathers cabinet to play with it and shoots somebody either on purpose or by mistake. Take away the gun, that incident never occurs. How can anyone who insists on having guns claim to have a brain?
@thechinadesk They don't understand that criminals don't follow the law to begin with, which in and of itself is a very basic concept that most children could understand. The fact of the matter is that most gun control advocates are simply ignorant of anything to do with the issue or firearms in general.
I.E. Carolyn McCarthy's magic "heat seeking bullets" and her "Shoulder thing that goes up"
Actually, the compulsion to "control guns" is psychologically identical to the compulsion to control certain weeds that grown naturally in the wild.
Controllers of any substance, whether guns or weeds, share the mindset the authoritarian dictator grimly determined to impose his own simplistic order over the complexity of life.
Put simply, they are fascist control freaks who don't trust freedom and liberty.
Guns being legalised really depends on the culture. Some people dislike the idea of everyone having a gun, because chances of gun abuse is increased. Whilst others believe that guns can be a deterrant to a crime.
In the end, neither Country is any worse than the other, so just shut up about it.
What's wrong with "pro-life" people? What was wrong with the first George Bush? Heston was a great man who supported our constitutional rights. Fuck off. The Dems got their asses kicked in 2010, and Obozo is gone next year, fag.
Even if guns are banned, you can still be shot by criminals with ILLEGAL guns. Law abiding citizens with guns are a deterrant. Switzerland is loaded with guns and has very little gun crime.
If guns are illegal, that means that you have no right to defend yourself against a mad man CARRYING AN ILLEGAL GUN who breaks into your home. Sorry, but I'd rather have the freedom to defend myself. I simply don't agree with your statement. There will be more home break ins if people AREN'T allowed to own guns.
Comparing legalizing rape to legalizing guns is a fallacious argument. Rape is an action, and it is always wrong. There's never a "good rape." A gun is a tool that can be used for good. That's why cops carry guns, stupid. Responsible citizens owning guns is good, and it's a deterrant to crime. Apples and oranges.
This shit is stupid
penaranda86 5 days ago
Bullets that don't fit the gun's.
1playingyou 1 week ago
"thats gonna happen pretty quick" what a major league dickwad
rigatony019 1 week ago
Gun control means using both hands.
theSCAWP 1 week ago
Has anyone ever been killed by a gun????Yes!........When? ... :DDDDDD
outlawpu 3 weeks ago
@b22frozenfire no! deffo Balloon... irish slag for a head full or air !! lol
digisexdj 1 month ago
Crappy Laugh track ruins this!
SmoKeeNReZo 1 month ago
@SmoKeeNReZo It is recorded on front of a live audience you balloon...
digisexdj 1 month ago
@digisexdj So they play it on a screen and record it?... Cause somehow I doubt there's an audience when he's sat in the NRA building :L
SmoKeeNReZo 1 month ago
@SmoKeeNReZo Now your just being stupid, No wonder you Americans are easy to take the piss out of!! Ali G got his first show on channel 4 here in the UK in 2000, where it invited guest onto his show for interviews plus he showed the videos of other interviews like the one above to an audience who attended his show.. Get it??
digisexdj 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everyone needs to be anti-gun! If you want a gun, join the army idiot. What we don't need are untrained, trigger happy civilians out there just waiting to use a gun during a violent conflict. If you morons want to carry a gun, join the police or armed forces. You see how effective carry a firearms is, violent crime is at an all time high. Civilians have NO justification for carrying any firearms. All this does is strokes their egos and makes them WANT to get involved in violent confrontations.
LAFD54 1 month ago
Some woman in Oklahoma just defended herself and her baby against a home invader by SHOOTING HIM DEAD. What do the anti-gun fags have to say about that? Should she have let the guy rape her instead?
Edgehead10075 1 month ago
NRA is sick as fuck, insane corporation
TheChernobylBoy 2 months ago
You're an anti-gun fag. Now, it's your right to be a fag who's afraid of guns, but please don't impose your fagginess on real men who love guns.
Edgehead10075 1 month ago
@Edgehead10075 You're a primary example of a red neck. Shooting the burglar? No country elsewhere does so, and we manage. I have been shooting loads of guns, but keeping it in your home as an acessory is just sick.
TheChernobylBoy 1 month ago
@TheChernobylBoy Hahahaha so what do you do? Invite him for dinner? Please tell him it is wrong to rob people? LOL
MRcalibrecincuenta 1 month ago
People keep it in their homes for protection, MORON. There's nothing wrong with that. Are you actually arguing that that woman in Oklahoma should have done nothing and let those scumbags possibly kill her and her baby? IDIOT.
BTW, I'm not a redneck. Simply believing in the right to bear arms doesn't make one a "redneck."
Edgehead10075 1 month ago
2:27
evofreak1304 2 months ago
Hahahaha his comment;i dont like ur political system lolll
youdontunderstand 2 months ago
@youdontunderstand He has a point, behind all the parlamentary BS it is still a monarchy, the same one that oppresed that guys ancestors before the revolution.
jamotide 1 month ago
guns dont kill people
people do
its true cause i seen it on
bbc 2
lol
leemillar141 3 months ago 18
niggers argumwntating in A ali g vidyo
sille nihgguzz
beertron7 4 months ago
I'm not a gun nut, but if you make guns illegal then the only people with guns will be the criminals. Crack is illegal but it doesn't stop people from getting it if they want it.
GALAXYSuperfan 5 months ago
@GALAXYSuperfan so we should make everything legal then...
metamaggot 5 months ago
"uh i dont like youre pollitical system"
"oh thanks alot."
burnout541 5 months ago
I think everyone should be allowed to have a handgun, but only with clips that hold 5 bullets.
I'm completely against folks able to own M16's and AK's and Mp5, and guns of that nature. Those are guns made to kill and assault, not for defense.
Seedofwinter 5 months ago
@Seedofwinter you can buy this weapons in Europe easily
b1tTutorials 5 months ago
@Seedofwinter It should be the individuals right to decide what type of gun they can have or how many bullets they can hold. NOT the governements.
Kingofprinces85 5 months ago
@Kingofprinces85 Okay, so individuals in Iran should be able to build nuclear weapons, or folks over here should be able to own stinger missiles with stinger launchers. RPG's should also be widely available.
Their comes a point in which you widen the net, or chance, of nefarious things happening when you make more and more powerful weapons widely available. I just don't understand why anyone would want automatic weapons available; the weapons were created to kill other humans
Seedofwinter 5 months ago
@Seedofwinter The point however is should the government be the one telling you what amount of force is necessary to protect yourself. If a private company manufactures rpgs they should be allowed to sell them to the public. Likelihood is the company will realize selling rpgs may not be great PR so lets not do that. The free market not the govt should put a cap on the amount of force a person can use.
Seaworldexists 5 months ago
@Seedofwinter Hiya, sorry to butt into the conversation..
"I just don't understand why anyone would want automatic weapons available; the weapons were created to kill other humans.."
I hear that loud & clear, but this is reality.. the guns are out there, & I do have the right to protect myself, so I'd rather be proactive than reactive.. How bout this,.. give me the credit for obeying the laws, & not punish me due to those who don't,.. when it comes to "My Personal Defence".. its my right..
Wrongway1965 5 months ago
@Kingofprinces85 It was the government that gave them that right in the first place, initially meant for protection against the Federal government. Why do you need guns? to protect yourself from...well... people who have been allowed guns? yeah, makes sense. Although, in fairness, changing the law now would, apart from angering hillbillies, not change much in the gang culture, people would still get guns. But thats just due to America's obsessed culture with guns...
chilledification 5 months ago
@CasaBenny I rather kill them than make them retarded.
peloteroification 5 months ago
US: you can buy a gun and kill dem people but you cant buy de herb and heal em
CasaBenny 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Also, are you American out of curiosity? I will respect your opinions as your own regardless of whether or not I believe them to be right, but some sort of evidence to back up your points would be nice (this tends to be a large part of debates)
chilledification 5 months ago
Notice how when gun rights violators don't know how to rebut pro gun arguments, they resort to name calling and obscenities?
Definitely uncool.
thechinadesk 6 months ago
@thechinadesk
You sound frustrated that you can't see your opponents and shoot them with your rocket launcher.
Columbine.
How many people would be dead if those chumps were carrying lethal knives instead of automatic weapons? They might have taken 2 or 3 down before being overpowered ...
,,, instead of the carnage we got
It's easy - if you make firearms freely available, then any nutcase can easily find a way to own one - it may be somebody who was once sane, bought a gun, then flipped.
jazzx251 5 months ago
@jazzx251 they were carrying semi-automatic's not full auto's.
thenoobcannon 5 months ago
GIRLS THEY LIKE THE GUNS :DD
rub3nski 6 months ago
yeah, just disarm the country and let the the commies and arabs invade us...NOT!
TheGuinnessboys 6 months ago
Guns are there to protect the average Joe from corrupt governments. Nazi Germany banned guns.
sparrowshafer 6 months ago
"has anyone ever been killed by a gun"
dmax631 6 months ago
@dmax631
The fact is no one has ever been killed by a gun.
Countless human beings have been killed in human history. But the indisputable fact remains that not one of them was ever killed by a gun. They were killed by other human beings.
This is a critical conceptual distinction. And it is precisely why those determined to deprive others of the means to defend themselves persist in their misleading formulation.
thechinadesk 6 months ago
@thechinadesk NO. The human may have pulled the trigger, but if there wasnt such a mad gun culture in America and guns werent so easily available, then they wouldnt have the trigger to pull in the first place and there would be 75,000 (as my last comment said) less deaths/injuries PER ANUM. That is a crazy amount, to put it in context: there were 3,000 victims in 9/11, a tragedy by any stretch of the imagination, but does it not bother you that 75,000 people are victims of gun attacks in the US?
chilledification 6 months ago
@dmax631
Isn't it interesting? Gun prohibitionists say they want to ban the private ownership of guns, out of respect for human life.
But then the very next moment they demonstrate how little respect they have for other human beings who dare to challenge their views on firearms ownership.
thechinadesk 6 months ago
countries that restrict gun ownership are sooooo lame. I would never want to live in one like that...
TVZombie3000 6 months ago
hahahahahahahahah
acquisces 6 months ago
The USA has the highest murder rates among Western countries, while it is the only country with so little gun control.
Isn't it clear enough for you guys that guns cause more violence than prevent?
Guitarvirtuoso666 6 months ago
i think it important for every american to on a machine gun and a hand with all the niggers and mexicans running around!!!!
psychick99 6 months ago
The law states that if a reasonable person would consider lethal force necessary, it is legal. That is OBVIOUSLY the context in which everybody is talking here. If a guy tried to rape a woman, you'd probably say that she should let him rape her.
Feminists ARE crazy. They support allowing women to kill the unborn, who pose no threat.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Anything will get in2 a criminal's hands when needed. He or she will go the extra mile 2 make their weapons (like they do in jail or breaking a glass bottle), buy it in a legal or illegal manner, so why should you disarm the general public? What's the difference between a cop w/ a gun & a good citizen? NOTHING!
In fact, from an investigator's point of view, using guns instead of elaborate ways of killing makes the investigation much easier, quicker & easier to deliver justice to the criminal
ScopedOUT2 7 months ago
@ScopedOUT2
The US has the highest murde rates among all western countries... Your theory makes sense, but when you make a comparative statistical study you will see that countries with strict gun control have much less violence and crime than the US. hence your theory is flawed:)
Guitarvirtuoso666 6 months ago
Edgehead10075 you are so right and I'm right there with you man. Keep after it and we can get this done
Themansestablisment 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jay16King
Why don't you read what I actually said, and respond to that, instead of putting words in my mouth and "refuting" your own straw man?
thechinadesk 7 months ago
@Jay16King
It's certainly your right to use what you consider "often more effective" means.
But if a woman or other vulnerable individual feels otherwise, it's really not your call.
thechinadesk 7 months ago
Liberals contradict themselves a lot. Liberals CORRECTLY point out that the war on drugs doesn't stop people from obtaining drugs, yet they think that banning guns will mean that nobody will possess guns. Why is that?
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
america isnt switzerland. wayyy more crazier people here. and of course, small dick conservatives who wanna argue about everything their fat ignorant fathers taught them. anyway. ali g is the shit. lol
sheskiefry 7 months ago
You're an idiot, and I have a right to bear arms to protect myself. It has nothing to do with trying to appear manly.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
crayzy generation cool!!
Lerinsom 7 months ago
Guns protect lives in the right hands, if they are outlawed, the criminals will still have them cause thats what a criminal is, someone who ignores the law.
Gun Control... IS BULLS**T!!!
RudySpino 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RudySpino Lol criminals are not born they are created by society
MrOfferp 7 months ago
calm down its fucking ali g
Josh44Tube 7 months ago
wow, very serious comments here - Ali G is just having a poke at the crazy gun laws in the US.
kirked007 7 months ago
What crazy laws?
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@kirked007 Your question sums up my point exactly!. People outside America in developed countries cannot understand USA citizens obsession with guns. Why do people in the USA want to carry guns?
kirked007 7 months ago
For protection.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@Edgehead10075 Isn't that just the point?, you need a gun to protect you from other people with guns. I live in Britain, whilst it is by no means perfect here it is incredibly rare to have gun crime. Posession of a gun will automatically mean a prison sentence.
kirked007 7 months ago
The point is that criminals will carry guns even if guns are banned, though. I don't agree that owning a gun for protection should give you a prison sentence.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@kirked007 thats just sad
TVZombie3000 6 months ago
3:44 What, because over here not just anyone is allowed to have a gun? Stupid Yank.
graemeoliver84 8 months ago
@graemeoliver84 We have background checks, age restrictions and licenses here. So, not everyone is allowed to own a gun in the US either.
warwager101 7 months ago
Women and other physically vulnerable individuals have the right to resort to technology, including firearms, to defend their persons and their property.
They have the right to carry with them such devices, to be used in the event a physically more powerful aggressor attempts to rob, rape, or murder them.
NO ONE has the right to disarm them, and leave them easy marks for muscular and ruthless career criminals.
thechinadesk 8 months ago 13
@thechinadesk What about tasers?
TagRation 8 months ago
@thechinadesk Stupidest comment on youtube. You really didn't think this through did you? Women can take care of themselves. If they are confronted by a MUSCULAR & RUTHLES CAREER CRIMINAL he would take the gun away from the bitch and shoot her. Do you hate men? Were you abused, raped? Either way you are a dumbass. This s a comedy sketch!
eqsmooth 6 months ago
@eqsmooth
Your comment speaks volumes. Far more than you realize.
thechinadesk 6 months ago
@thechinadesk And what does it speak? Did you forget what you were going to say about my comment? I don't get why women should be able to have guns but men cannot & why you chose an Ali G COMEDY clip to make some sort of feminist political statement. You go on this "women are victims & targets" rant to excuse a woman if she kills a man w/a gun. How are women physically vulnerable? I know many very fit, strong women who can do just about anything they want & do not consider themselves vulnerable.
eqsmooth 6 months ago
@thechinadesk you are a textbook example of an idiot !
bosanaczauvjek 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thechinadesk There wouldn't be nearly as many "career criminals" if they didn't have the means by which they commit the crimes. Think about it.
USA (legalized guns)-75,000 gunshot injuries in year 2000
UK (not legalized)- 3,000 gunshot injuries in year 2000
US has roughly 5 times the population of UK, so if you times the UK figure by five you are still only at 15,000 (compared to 75,000). That is 60,000 injuries/deaths as a result of legalized firearms and a 'gun culture'. sit down, shut up.
chilledification 6 months ago 15
@chilledification however the uk has a shitload of stabbings
dude444666444 5 months ago
@dude444666444 trueall police officers are actually issued blade proof vest
burnout541 5 months ago
@dude444666444 agreed. All counties have problems, UK is not exempt from that... But the gun violence totally exacerbates the situation. see the stats I gave to "the china desk" earlier.
chilledification 5 months ago
@chilledification Injuries may be higher but the murder rate is the same in the two countries. The only difference is that in the uk you would suffer a slow and painful death.
AlexanderMazarakis 5 months ago
@AlexanderMazarakis The murder rate is not the same in the two countries... UK was 651 (although stats vary) in 2008. In the USA it was 14,748 in 2010. Even if you take into account the population difference and times UK's by 5... you still get no where near it. ALSO, are you seriously basing your argument on the fact that guns are a good thing because you die quicker? despite the fact that many many more people would die with guns introduced?
chilledification 5 months ago
@chilledification that is the murder from guns not the total murder rate.
AlexanderMazarakis 5 months ago
@chilledification most of those "gunshot" injuries were caused by CRIMINALS with ILLEGALLY obtained firearms. Meaning those injuries would have been caused even if guns were illegal because criminals would have obtained them anyway!
Kingofprinces85 5 months ago
@chilledification In th UK where guns are not legal then how did 3000 gunshot injuries happen? Guns need to be legal I will protect myself if someone breaks into my house.
theDoubleA1245 5 months ago
@theDoubleA1245 unfortunately the ridiculous laws in the UK prevent you from even beating someone up on your own property
chilledification 4 months ago
@chilledification I never knew that the eighty million plus legal gun owners in the U.S, including myself, ever used a gun in a crime, or ever committed a crime at all. I have never committed a crime, and eighty million gun owners shot no one today.
.......
copperjarhead 4 months ago
@copperjarhead
........Besides, guns are used in self defense, which is why that number is so high. One other reason that number is high is because 95-99% of that number is gang on gang, so good reddens.
Their would not be as many "career criminals" if the justice system worked the way it should, or if more people carried and defended themselves from those scum.
copperjarhead 4 months ago
@chilledification
well, firearms also account for less than 10 percent of ur murders. u European savages prefer to cut each other to pieces with knives. personally, I'd rather be gunned down than stabbed to death. much less painful.
I understand that u've been brainwashed by ur government to hate anything that would allow u to defend ur rights from them, but u fucking idiots let the government put cameras IN YOUR HOMES. that makes u so fucking stupid that u don't get to tell us shit about shit
CarbineKingClassic 4 months ago
@CarbineKingClassic your ignorance knows no bounds. We don't have cameras in our homes. All I am saying is that so many people are killed in America due to legalized guns, but it's something inherently wrong with the culture. Canada have legalized guns, but a far smaller % of people die from guns. I don't have the answer, maybe it's the poverty levels. A ban now on guns wouldn't help,the criminals would keep guns, and others left defenseless. But its a shame it got to that in the first place.
chilledification 4 months ago
I disagree. ppl r killed in our country because the same government that wishes to take our guns has historically excluded ppl from mainstream society by subjugating them to inner city slums, creating black markets through drug prohibition, and introducing crack into our black communities. it's not something wrong with the culture, it's the political establishment creating problems so that they'll hav an excuse to enact totalitarian laws. and yes, ur government does do that. i just looked it up
CarbineKingClassic 4 months ago
@CarbineKingClassic but that is the culture that has been created... its not the citizens fault necessarily...
chilledification 4 months ago
@chilledification Guns dont kill people. people kill people. now u sit down n shut up u fuckin troll.
JoeCaliforniah 4 months ago
@JoeCaliforniah Is that an NRA propaganda slogan by any chance? Nice... well I suppose nuclear bombs don't kill anyone do they then? I think you'll find they do. I agree, it is the person's choice to pull the trigger most of the time, but they wouldn't have a gun to fire in the first place without legalized guns. Similarly, it was a person who dropped the two Atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but if they didn't have the bomb in the first place, those people wouldn't have been killed.
chilledification 4 months ago
@chilledification You ban gun, u think it solves the problem? u must be an idiot then. People is good at problem solving, as long as the intention is there, people will always come up with other means. Gun is never the problem.
JoeCaliforniah 4 months ago
@JoeCaliforniah look at my earlier posts, I think America can't ban guns now, only the criminals will be left with guns. I think its something wrong with the culture, or poverty levels, I don't know. Im just saying that its a shame the US has got to the stage where everyone needs MAD (mutually assured destruction), what I mean is people have guns, to protect from other people with guns... if guns werent so promoted in the first place then maybe it wouldnt be as big a problem.
chilledification 4 months ago
@JoeCaliforniah Could you repeat that post in English?
LMW87MMA 4 months ago
@LMW87MMA Its funny cos you is trying too hard init?
JoeCaliforniah 4 months ago
@chilledification
I'm sure we have more knife crime, proportionally, to compensate, though.
Agree with your sentiment to an extent though.
HoneyIEducatedTheWeb 4 months ago
@chilledification LOL yeah how many of those criminals use legal guns? I highly doubt US criminals walk into gunshops and buy a gun with a bad record. A US FBI investigation found that only 2% of crimes are committed with legally registered guns. Face it even if you banned guns they're still there on the black market. Wait arent drugs illegal too? But yet they're somehow still on the street. But there is a difference between drugs and guns, and that is you cant grow guns :P.
ibilliedyourmomhard 4 months ago
@chilledification Also due to YT and its comment length Im writting this. You can also make drugs with household items.
ibilliedyourmomhard 4 months ago 4
@chilledification
You make an arbitrary comparison between 2 countries and then pompously claim that it is the gospel truth? Get off your high horse.......what other evidence do you have to present besides your know it all hypothesis?
MeLoveIsrael 4 months ago
@MeLoveIsrael Im not on a high horse. Im not even suggesting that the US can ban guns, that would be absurd. All im saying is there is a bit of an issue with the gun culture in the US. Arbitrary implies that the figures are redundant, which they are not.
chilledification 3 months ago
@chilledification You really believe nobody can commit a crime without a gun? OK, I thought about it: It's so dumb you've got to be trolling.
Also, look up "post hoc ergo propter hoc". You can copy and paste if it's too hard for you to spell.
arlingtonhynes 3 months ago
@arlingtonhynes At what point did I imply that statement? Stop putting words in my mouth, and actually go and read the rest of what I have said to understand what my point is you ignorant cretin
chilledification 3 months ago
@thechinadesk Hey we aren't physically vulnerable. Some are not as strong as men and some are as strong. Not all criminals are muscular either but if they were then normal men are physically vulnerable too.
MegaWinnieGirl 6 months ago
@MegaWinnieGirl
True. It was a statistical generalization. My point was that no one has the right to deprive women of the right to defend themselves, by whatever means women see fit.
During the Paleolithic Era, males routinely did whatever they wished to women they encountered. With the invention of firearms, any woman who has the strength to pull a trigger, can prevent a male predator from overpowering her.
Women must not be deprived of this option.
thechinadesk 6 months ago
@thechinadesk Well I do self defense classes and they really help. I wouldn't want to shoot anybody.
What do you mean whatever they wished? Like...Rape?
MegaWinnieGirl 6 months ago
@MegaWinnieGirl
Not wanting to shoot anybody is your choice. You have a right to make that decision for yourself.
But nobody else has the right to make that decision for you. Only you have the right to determine what risks you are willing to take.
thechinadesk 6 months ago
@thechinadesk But then what about accidents? Shooting someone perceived as a threat who isn't, for example.
MegaWinnieGirl 6 months ago
@MegaWinnieGirl
You have the natural right (Google "natural rights theory") to protect your own life against those who would take it from you.
Relinquishing that right to "duly authorized law enforcement officials" may sound judicious and "Solomonic."
But since 9/11, incidents such as the Amadou Diallo shooting have become increasingly common. If you recall, NYPD cops fired 41 rounds at an UNARMED immigrant from Guineau.
Ultimately, we are on our own.
thechinadesk 6 months ago
@thechinadesk OR theres something called mace, or a tazzer which would sufficiently apprehend any rapist
chilledification 6 months ago
@chilledification
If you want to depend on mace or a taser (not tazzer), you have the right to do so.
You do not have the right to forbid others to defend their own lives with other means. Their lives are theirs. They don't belong to you. It's simply not your call.
That's the meaning of the term "individual rights." They belong to the individual, not to self-appointed spokesmen for "society as a whole."
thechinadesk 6 months ago
@thechinadesk If you read my whole response you wouldn't have given such a banal response. Obviously a gun is better for killing people than a taser or pepper spray etc. But the consequences of having those guns in society far outweigh the positives. If you could please give me a worthwhile response to my previous comments based on all the statistics I would very much appreciate it, you have obviously decided to pick out a minor part of my argument and ignore the facts in front of you.
chilledification 6 months ago
@chilledification
Someone who feels justified deciding for others whether they may own and use firearms to defend themselves, presumes to speak for "society." He feels justified deciding for others what is "banal" as opposed to cogent, whether the negatives outweigh the "positives," and what is "minor" as opposed to "worthwhile."
Actually, the most glaring fact being ignored, is the fact that other people are not obligated to see things the way you do, and you find that intolerable.
thechinadesk 6 months ago
@thechinadesk Thats because the way you see things is illogical, so yes, please do excuse me for believing that in 2007 12,632 people were killed by guns in the US. Yet in whole of Iraq up to 2010, 4,404 US soldiers had been killed. The facts stand out, in one year there were 3 TIMES as many murders than in Iraq. I have not done this to marginalize the work of the US soldiers, they have given their lives, this merely highlights the flaws in US society, and the guns exacerbate the situation.
chilledification 6 months ago
@chilledification
Nobody has ever been "killed by guns in the US" unless of course the gun was defective, and blew up in the user's face.
Many people have been killed by other people however.
thechinadesk 6 months ago
@thechinadesk you've already used this response... please read my response to it. Also, rather than merely complaining about how I try to 'speak for a nation', please can you directly give a response to the facts I have put infront of you, and no, I do not want any faint, half-hearted waffly response as your last several have been.
Regards...
chilledification 6 months ago
@chilledification
You realize that your call to disarm individuals who are incapable of defending themselves with their bare hands is morally indefensible.
So in desperation, you attempt to play a numbers game. But a defender of the right to keep and bear arms refuses to take the bait. So you try to put your own spin on your evasiveness. You allege "faint, half-hearted, waffly."
Maybe it'll work. But I doubt it.
Me, I think I'll "sit down. shut up." I've made my point.
thechinadesk 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thechinadesk Is it not morally indefensible to arm criminals with guns?? You dismiss the FACTS as a 'numbers game', but the numbers don't lie. It is not a 'bait' to catch you out, rather the proof is in the facts. I used the phrase "faint, half-hearted waffly" for your previous responses, because, if you re read them, none of them actually act as an answer of some sort, they are irrelevant jibes on how I try to "speak for a nation" (at no point did I say so, I put across my opinions as my own)
chilledification 5 months ago
@thechinadesk yeah...other people with guns, assault rifles, etc. The NRA are pimps for the gu n manufacturers--and Republican are pimps for the NRA.
TheClam88 5 months ago in playlist Ali G
@thechinadesk what ever you thoughtless fuck wit
orbital92hotmail 6 months ago
anyone who carries a shotgun on his private boat for protection is a fuckin lunatic. you really got some issues over there in the states
OriginalSliz 8 months ago
@OriginalSliz We have pirates here I think.
TagRation 8 months ago
People have a right to protection EVERYWHERE.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@Edgehead10075
i agree ...but i think you know what i mean
OriginalSliz 7 months ago
@Edgehead10075
sure they have but i think you know what i mean ... another boat might carry a gun so you have to protect yourself from being shot at by another boat ? :D
OriginalSliz 6 months ago
True, but a guy who's intent on doing harm to others is going to carry a gun even if it's illegal to do so. I wouldn't worry about another boater who has a gun for protection.
Edgehead10075 6 months ago
A good handgun in the hand of a 5'-5" 90 lb. woman, alone in her home late at night, can protect her against being raped, murdered, and dismembered by a 6'-5" 290 lb. intruder.
Take away her gun, and she would have to defend herself with her bare hands.
How can anyone who insists on banning guns claim to have a heart?
thechinadesk 8 months ago
@thechinadesk
yeah right ... all of the guncrimes/murders in the usa are just people who tried to defend themselfs. thank god they were armed otherwise they might would have been shot :D get it ?
OriginalSliz 8 months ago
@OriginalSliz
You didn't answer the question. You ducked it by changing the subject, and by adopting a snide attitude, hoping no one would notice you that you have no morally plausible response.
Bottom line? The woman in my example has a right to defend herself.
QED
thechinadesk 8 months ago
@thechinadesk
blah blah blah ... :D its not about ur little example. what are you trying to prove with it anyway? makes no sense and sounds very paranoid... look at the facts and try to think logical. expand ur horizon. (...wont reply to ur answer if u write one btw. arguing with ppl on youtube is too boring. dont take it personal)
OriginalSliz 8 months ago
@OriginalSliz
Translation:
"Gee, I don't know how to respond, so I'll just bluster some and walk away, hoping no one notices I was afraid to debate fundamental moral principles, natural rights, and political liberty."
thechinadesk 8 months ago
@thechinadesk A good handgun in the hands of a small child who takes it out of his fathers cabinet to play with it and shoots somebody either on purpose or by mistake. Take away the gun, that incident never occurs. How can anyone who insists on having guns claim to have a brain?
afurrypanda 8 months ago
@afurrypanda
I agree, the parent should "take away the gun" as you put it.
thechinadesk 8 months ago
@thechinadesk Well there is a population issue in china that needs resolve....
homiedog100 8 months ago
@homiedog100
I leave it to third parties, does this really warrant an earnest response?
thechinadesk 8 months ago
@thechinadesk I was making a reference to your username.
homiedog100 8 months ago
@thechinadesk Alarm System?
TagRation 8 months ago
@thechinadesk They don't understand that criminals don't follow the law to begin with, which in and of itself is a very basic concept that most children could understand. The fact of the matter is that most gun control advocates are simply ignorant of anything to do with the issue or firearms in general.
I.E. Carolyn McCarthy's magic "heat seeking bullets" and her "Shoulder thing that goes up"
Southparker100000000 7 months ago
@Southparker100000000
Actually, the compulsion to "control guns" is psychologically identical to the compulsion to control certain weeds that grown naturally in the wild.
Controllers of any substance, whether guns or weeds, share the mindset the authoritarian dictator grimly determined to impose his own simplistic order over the complexity of life.
Put simply, they are fascist control freaks who don't trust freedom and liberty.
thechinadesk 7 months ago
@Southparker100000000
The authoritarian control freaks like to say things such as "Last year guns killed over 10,000 people in Upper Slobovia!"
The reality of course, is that no gun has ever killed a single human being since guns were invented by the Chinese in the 11th century.
thechinadesk 7 months ago
dere be some arcore debatin goin on up in dis comment seckshun
cloudycolacorp 8 months ago
Guns being legalised really depends on the culture. Some people dislike the idea of everyone having a gun, because chances of gun abuse is increased. Whilst others believe that guns can be a deterrant to a crime.
In the end, neither Country is any worse than the other, so just shut up about it.
scartillery 8 months ago
Ali G is the best troll ever
Nvidiaguides 8 months ago
À whole discussion srry
Padrino6 8 months ago
À while discussion here...just enjoy THE video! Its for amusement anyway
Padrino6 8 months ago
Britain is an island.
USA is north of Mexico so banning guns completely in the US would mean latino criminals would still have guns.
MattHXIV 8 months ago
Maybe he wouldn't have shot at anyone had people been allowed to carry guns there, fearing that he would, too, be shot.
Edgehead10075 8 months ago
Youngsters from 15 year old are allowed to wear the gun.....Wicked! xD
Padrino6 8 months ago
What's wrong with "pro-life" people? What was wrong with the first George Bush? Heston was a great man who supported our constitutional rights. Fuck off. The Dems got their asses kicked in 2010, and Obozo is gone next year, fag.
Edgehead10075 9 months ago
A nut just did shoot a politician in Arizona. It did not affect our laws one bit.
Edgehead10075 9 months ago
get a grip, it's only a video
jamessheep 9 months ago
HUSS HUSS HUSS HUSS HUSS HUSS
Edgehead10075 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You're an idiot, and you even admitted that you hate the Constitution.
Edgehead10075 9 months ago
Don't like guns? Don't buy one.
Even if guns are banned, you can still be shot by criminals with ILLEGAL guns. Law abiding citizens with guns are a deterrant. Switzerland is loaded with guns and has very little gun crime.
Edgehead10075 9 months ago
If guns are illegal, that means that you have no right to defend yourself against a mad man CARRYING AN ILLEGAL GUN who breaks into your home. Sorry, but I'd rather have the freedom to defend myself. I simply don't agree with your statement. There will be more home break ins if people AREN'T allowed to own guns.
Edgehead10075 9 months ago
The safety of society is not put to risk by me owning a gun. I'm a responsible citizen.
Edgehead10075 9 months ago
Too bad, jesselaffan. Just because some idiots shoot members of their own families doesn't mean you take guns away from RESPONSIBLE owners.
Edgehead10075 9 months ago
I'm an agnostic.
Edgehead10075 9 months ago
Many people have successfully defended themselves with guns. Numbers don't lie.
Edgehead10075 9 months ago
Comparing legalizing rape to legalizing guns is a fallacious argument. Rape is an action, and it is always wrong. There's never a "good rape." A gun is a tool that can be used for good. That's why cops carry guns, stupid. Responsible citizens owning guns is good, and it's a deterrant to crime. Apples and oranges.
Edgehead10075 9 months ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
@Edgehead10075 wheres ur evidence that supports your wild claims?
phdotsco 8 months ago
@Edgehead10075 how is a gun sometimes used for good? you think there are situations where killing a human being is "good"?
pumitaproductions 8 months ago
So killing someone in self defense isn't good? Why do you think cops carry them if they're pure evil?
Edgehead10075 8 months ago
@Edgehead10075 anyone who uses them to kill another human is seriously fucked inside. every human being is precious