lol i love all these russian trolls... they are the same fools that want the same reaction out of you all.. dont feed the trolls :P. i thought first hmmm comparing a Havoc to a Apache would be something but a HIND?!. the Hind is a flying piece of junk... it was developed when the russians were commies and cleaned out their tech.. to begin with mostly the Hind uses analog equipment if your comparing the time of tech to this :P. its nothing to speak of even. the apache is superior.
the apache is used for close air support e.g if the army need support the apache will be called. The apache can carry up to 70 ALL SO missiles in each turret. And the pilot has a sensored helmet on which if he or her turns heads left or right so will the spot cam. The apcheis also 1 of the slowest helicopters out there but its a nasty peice of kit so any taliban gets in its way there pretty much dead lolz.
That goes to the broadcaster of the video: The AH-64A did not carry fire-and-forget Hellfire missiles...That capability has been added later with the introduction of the Apache's latest variant, the AH-64D Longbow...Due to the use of a new radar, the Apache then was capable of firing those missiles...Nice brief documentary, anyway, thanks for posting, mate.
Hey everyone I've just recently made a video to do with war and would REALLY, REALLY appreciate if you could take a look, it shows the reality of war and gives a glimpse of how it really is, thank you, feed-back is accepted, no time wasters please. Thank you0
Look before technical characteristics Ka-52 and Mi-28. Ok? In general, Mi-28 and Apache it is senseless to compare. Mi-28 has more powerful arms, more perfect precisely-navigating system, more maneuverable and has the best armour. Mi-28 higher class, than Apache. Ka-52 it was planned to use as the command helicopter for management of groups Ka-50. It also more modern heli.
Name to me war where helicopters of the identical version of updating resisted to one another? Where? And it is possible to speak about what fighting application? In Iraq where Saddam used out-of-date arms? It is better to make use of experience of the Chechen Republic where terrorists had those Russian arms which was and at the Russian army. Terrorists had tanks, armoured troop-carriers, portable anti-aircraft missiles the Strela(SA-13 Gopher), the Igla(SA-18 Grouse) etc.
Now they know how the yanks feel picking up pieces of what WAS a bunch of apaches in Iraq... Or at least they would if a KA52 had ever been shot down... which it hasn't.
It didn't need to be shot down to crash. KA 52 crashes well enough on its own. Heavier, slower, less armed, less range, lower ceiling than Apache, BTW in service 12 years earlier than KA 52. KA 52 = fewer than 15 fly today. AH 64 = almost 1800 flying in 13 nations, and growing.
All prototypes have a high crash risk... but I've never heard of a KA52 crashing - so send me a link or I'll disbelieve you.
By the way, the Apaches in foreign service are shit - to pick one example, the british ones damage their own tail rotors every time they fire a hellfire - necessitating a trip to the us 4 repairs. Hardly the mark of a great chopper.
BTW KA52 has higher speed, cieling is irelevant, heavier 'cos of decent armour & will hover longer over a target for CAS.
Please, some links to the british Apache crashes..... I didn' t find any. Plus British ones are made in UK so they' re not shiped back to US for repairs.
Also if KA52 was not in Georgia how can you say it's better? Until it's proven worthy in combat (like apache did many times) we can not tell. Plus Apache's main advantage is it's sensors (longbow) and hellfire missile, not speed and armour, and russians do not have anything as effective as that yet.if they do please links
I read it in the Guardian newspaper - so look on the Guardian's (A UK newspaper) website.
I don't think KA52 was better, I think Hinds better, sorry if I didn't make myself clear :-)
I think the Hinds ability to escort itself & carry troops would make it perfect for medevac duties in Afghanistan/Iraq - an Apache escorted Chinook can't do it's full speed without losing it's escort - that's bad news for the solider & that's why I prefer Hind. Little bird would be an acceptable alternative tho.
Son, wikipedia is posted by anyone who wants to post - NO FACT CHECKING, OPEN FORUM. AH 64 carries almost double the fire power and more than double the weapon range of the KA 52. Also double the horsepower.
Wikipedia also lists the lunar landing as fake.
BUT, since you read the Guardian, read about the two that crashed in GA.
Bro the British Apaches are owned and made by the British, Only the body is similar. Hell the rotors fold so it can be made shipborne, the KA-52 is good too, but learn our resources before you spit bullshit, also they have no problems with their hell fires.
Just an old movie. McDonnell bought Douglas, becoming McDonnell Douglas. MD then bought Hughes, so the Hughes AH64 Apache became the McDonell Douglas AH64 Apache. Then this film was made. Boeing then bought McDonnell Douglas and the Apache became the Boeing A64 Apache. Simple as that.
Magnetic Gun technology;;;Can a chain of bullets be magnetically enhanced to become magnetically charged with a small amount of negative electro charge. If the chain of bullets had a non friction magnet force, less vibration and could be faster through the gun and gun be a magnetic gun also.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You 2 best shut the f*ck up coz I actually own an apache & i'll blow up your fat mums with my hell fire missiles! Then i'll tie you to the rotors and spin you round real fast until your sick & your own sick smacks you in the face at 300 mph, YEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAGGGGHHHH DOG! Then i'll jam 1 of the still attached missiles right up your ass before shooting you at your dads HEHEHEHEHEHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!
Yes toogij, The Apache can do "a looping" but it wasnt meant for that so it can be really hard on the rotor system, especially if not performed correctly. They can also do a roll. Rolls if performed correctly are done at 1g the whole way around.....The US Army trains Egyptian to fly their aircraft. So the argument earlier makes no sense.
Imagine what we could do if we paid that kind of attention to detail to ourselves, our societies and peace. I hope I'm not the only person who is alarmed by this piece of shit video. The calmness and salesman like demeanor of the narrator is particularly disturbing. I'm sure he would also achieve excellent sales figures in marketing for landmines and childrens handcuffs.
Seriously there isn't. They are very good and cost effective area denial weapons, which will force the enemy to either spend large amount of resources to get through or to get forced into an alternate approach.
There's a fucking huge difference between the massive minefield at the Finnish-Russian borders and in the playground in Bosnia-Hercegovina, and you know it.
That means both of these things are INDIVIDUALISTIC and cannot be compared with others who have had different upbringings. Therefore, before you go running your mouth off about things you have hardly considered, take a few seconds, and THINK...unlike your country which tends to ACT before THINKING. It might get you somewhere.
p.s. you are technically right about US work ethics..I mean you are the most overworked and underpaid First World Nations on the planet. Kudos!
hey moonfire i couldnt help but notice your post wow all that education,politics,cultural anthropology,global econmics,u really no how to put people in their place,so why you got all those videos on your profile of people and KIDS in diapers? do you have a diaper fetish or what?
moonfire im one of those overworked americans youre putting down,i dont have a lot of education and have been called a banjo playin inbred mongoloid but my american ass can shoo 1/2" groups at 200 yards.and i jus fukin luv foreigners that put my country down
and my idividualistic bullet cost is less than 20 cents per round so pull out your slide rule and tell me how much money does it take to turn a motherfuckers LIGHTS OUT? (regardless of individualistic nationality)
moonboy you really should be nicer to people man bragging about all that education, puttin us down, using them BIG wordsbut above all else PLEASE get help for that diaper fetish man its one thing to be alittle kinky but watching people pee in diapers is just SICK
collardgreeneatinsob, is that Egyptian sweating you? Forget about it, the U.K.'s got your back. See response to him down the page. He isn't as smart as he thinks. He also failed to mention how HIS government readily accepts terrorist suspects from the USA and EU and tortures them for us, because our society objects to torture, but his think it is perfectly okay. As long as the CIA pays them...
It shows exactly where your government has its priorities and it certainly isn't on its own people. By the way, I have taken several years of Cultural Anthropology at the University level and I know global economy and politics like the back of my hand. Intelligence in war...I call it machismo. Who's got the biggest and best machine!?! By the way, intelligence and work ethic are LEARNED...they are not natural..you are NEVER born with them.
When your military budget is 132.8 Billion dollars US (2007), you can afford to make ridiculous machines of war. KlubMarcus, it is hilarious that you mention that the people of the US are more hardworking and smarter than the "muslim terrorists" when you consider that the US government spends a mere 67.2 billion dollars educating its own people. Compare that to Israel, whose budget has practically equivalent figures for both defense and education. Isn't that impressive?
Moonfire, what your little essay failed to say though is that EGYPT (your country) spends 3.4% of its GDP on defence, while America spends 4.06%. Sounds like both governments put similar importance on defence spending to me. What about education? Egypt has a literacy rate of 71.4% while the USA has 99%. Who's the asshole? Oh yeah, that would be YOU.
I guess that muslim terrorists are just jealous that they aren't smart enough or hard-working enough to actual design, build, and deploy an Apache. Allied Arab militaries have to buy the Apache from America.
Yea, originally built by Hughes, bought out by McDonnell Douglas, bought out by Boeing. The anti torgue pedals had the Hughes logo molded into them, I wonder if the "D" models today still do today?
You're probably looking at the engine's nose gear boxes mounted in front of the engines. The hole in the front is to allow airflow in and around the gear box to aid cooling.
So glad i'm out of all that and just design T-shirts now.Apache's awesome but the A-10's the one i fear.Want awesome military t's,Apache helicopter T-shirts? You do then vsit Bignumptees Military Madhouse and take a butchers at the cool designs
In the world of militant Islam, the Apache has been referred to numerous times as the "Angel of Death." Now, an arms dealer knows he's done his job when a weapon he made gets a nickname like that.
The KA-52 doesn't even have a turreted cannon. It's also a disaster in foreign military sales. So obviously, when it's time to decide wether or not to buy Russian junk or American firepower, they buy American.
Well they could, and did, easily fix the turreted cannon problem. I think the Ka would be good in certain situations, such as situations where there might be more air resistence. Maybe the US shoudl buy a few for situations liek that. But mostly i tihnk the US relies on its air force to handle things like that.
ahahaha no... silly boy.. hes saying "nap of the earth profile". By this he means that the Apaches frame is suited to flying at low altitudes while sticking to geographical land forms and trees for cover so that it can lauch surprise attack on tanks and avoid radar contact...
My RC model is greater!
Samyaza69 1 month ago
Its better to have one and not need it...than to need one and not have it.
THESTANDARDKID 7 months ago
15 people preferred the ac 130
redsuyguy98 9 months ago
a weapon of cowardice
LimpLoser 10 months ago
@LimpLoser so's a gun, but you dont see anyone complaining about that.
DarkstarNovembr 7 months ago
Spoko kurwa tylko czemu po waszemu
megatron2336 1 year ago
@megatron2336
się ucz... to będziesz kumał ;P
mariodivine 9 months ago
@GrimLockUK the helicopter is mcdonnell douglas not mcdonald dougas
redvenom777 1 year ago
they can be very proud they made a great KILLING MACHINE ! well dome mc doug!
MrLovefile 1 year ago
@MrLovefile actually they make a great SAVING LIFES MACHINE .
hamzasat 9 months ago
ahhhh the 1980s
countryboy44555 1 year ago
i love the 1st attack helicopter in the world.
AH-1 Cobra. The Super Cobra is good too
auro1986 1 year ago
lol i love all these russian trolls... they are the same fools that want the same reaction out of you all.. dont feed the trolls :P. i thought first hmmm comparing a Havoc to a Apache would be something but a HIND?!. the Hind is a flying piece of junk... it was developed when the russians were commies and cleaned out their tech.. to begin with mostly the Hind uses analog equipment if your comparing the time of tech to this :P. its nothing to speak of even. the apache is superior.
TommyA9011 1 year ago 3
the apache is used for close air support e.g if the army need support the apache will be called. The apache can carry up to 70 ALL SO missiles in each turret. And the pilot has a sensored helmet on which if he or her turns heads left or right so will the spot cam. The apcheis also 1 of the slowest helicopters out there but its a nasty peice of kit so any taliban gets in its way there pretty much dead lolz.
TheFighterpilot93 2 years ago
and what do u know about the apche because u probably dont have a clue m8
TheFighterpilot93 2 years ago
That goes to the broadcaster of the video: The AH-64A did not carry fire-and-forget Hellfire missiles...That capability has been added later with the introduction of the Apache's latest variant, the AH-64D Longbow...Due to the use of a new radar, the Apache then was capable of firing those missiles...Nice brief documentary, anyway, thanks for posting, mate.
RainbowWalker911 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey everyone I've just recently made a video to do with war and would REALLY, REALLY appreciate if you could take a look, it shows the reality of war and gives a glimpse of how it really is, thank you, feed-back is accepted, no time wasters please. Thank you0
xXTrueSkillsXx 2 years ago
Look before technical characteristics Ka-52 and Mi-28. Ok? In general, Mi-28 and Apache it is senseless to compare. Mi-28 has more powerful arms, more perfect precisely-navigating system, more maneuverable and has the best armour. Mi-28 higher class, than Apache. Ka-52 it was planned to use as the command helicopter for management of groups Ka-50. It also more modern heli.
ReDDDgo 2 years ago
Comment removed
heiheit 2 years ago
Comment removed
ReDDDgo 2 years ago
Name to me war where helicopters of the identical version of updating resisted to one another? Where? And it is possible to speak about what fighting application? In Iraq where Saddam used out-of-date arms? It is better to make use of experience of the Chechen Republic where terrorists had those Russian arms which was and at the Russian army. Terrorists had tanks, armoured troop-carriers, portable anti-aircraft missiles the Strela(SA-13 Gopher), the Igla(SA-18 Grouse) etc.
ReDDDgo 2 years ago 6
why isnt there any heavy metal as the background music... instead of that granny shit. ???
maeggle21 2 years ago
Dude! You, like so rock!
*rolls eyes*
vodkasvictim 2 years ago
It's a government orientation film - boring and dry.
DrMotorDude 2 years ago
lol like the music
Shuffling69Israeli 2 years ago
interesting stuff, its certainly come a long way since this info clip.
Cheers for posting.
MartinRV1975 2 years ago
wow! where are the "ka-52 is the best, ka-52 is the best!"
bullshit comments from the Russians that usually grace the comments sections of videos like this?
cra83 2 years ago 2
ka-52 is the best, ka-52 is the best!"
:P
ChrizR22 2 years ago
cra83,
Good question, they're in Georgia picking up pieces of what WAS a bunch of ka-52s.
DrMotorDude 2 years ago
Really? i didnt know they were used. Not that i checked extensively.....
cra83 2 years ago
Now they know how the yanks feel picking up pieces of what WAS a bunch of apaches in Iraq... Or at least they would if a KA52 had ever been shot down... which it hasn't.
Get it right.
vodkasvictim 2 years ago
It didn't need to be shot down to crash. KA 52 crashes well enough on its own. Heavier, slower, less armed, less range, lower ceiling than Apache, BTW in service 12 years earlier than KA 52. KA 52 = fewer than 15 fly today. AH 64 = almost 1800 flying in 13 nations, and growing.
Learn some facts
DrMotorDude 2 years ago 2
All prototypes have a high crash risk... but I've never heard of a KA52 crashing - so send me a link or I'll disbelieve you.
By the way, the Apaches in foreign service are shit - to pick one example, the british ones damage their own tail rotors every time they fire a hellfire - necessitating a trip to the us 4 repairs. Hardly the mark of a great chopper.
BTW KA52 has higher speed, cieling is irelevant, heavier 'cos of decent armour & will hover longer over a target for CAS.
Hinds better tho.
vodkasvictim 2 years ago
Please, some links to the british Apache crashes..... I didn' t find any. Plus British ones are made in UK so they' re not shiped back to US for repairs.
Also if KA52 was not in Georgia how can you say it's better? Until it's proven worthy in combat (like apache did many times) we can not tell. Plus Apache's main advantage is it's sensors (longbow) and hellfire missile, not speed and armour, and russians do not have anything as effective as that yet.if they do please links
strudlinho 2 years ago
I read it in the Guardian newspaper - so look on the Guardian's (A UK newspaper) website.
I don't think KA52 was better, I think Hinds better, sorry if I didn't make myself clear :-)
I think the Hinds ability to escort itself & carry troops would make it perfect for medevac duties in Afghanistan/Iraq - an Apache escorted Chinook can't do it's full speed without losing it's escort - that's bad news for the solider & that's why I prefer Hind. Little bird would be an acceptable alternative tho.
vodkasvictim 2 years ago
Read Jane's Defense Weekly and stop making things up.
DrMotorDude 2 years ago
Go to wikipedia and compare the two.
You'll see I'm not making anything up.
If I was I'd claim the KA52 was cheaper, faster, better armed and armoured & capable of downing the entire apache fleet of the us in a minute.
Instead - I post the truth. Just 'cos you don't like it - doesn't mean it's not true.
vodkasvictim 2 years ago
Son, wikipedia is posted by anyone who wants to post - NO FACT CHECKING, OPEN FORUM. AH 64 carries almost double the fire power and more than double the weapon range of the KA 52. Also double the horsepower.
Wikipedia also lists the lunar landing as fake.
BUT, since you read the Guardian, read about the two that crashed in GA.
DrMotorDude 2 years ago
Yeah I know it's an open forum & am WELL aware of the dangers associated with that.
Which source would you prefer I use? Should I listen to a Hughes helicopters sales rep for his completely unbiassed view?
I don't see the advantage of double the horsepower - with those contra-rotational rotors that advantage seems mostly cancelled out
I never disputed your claim that Apache carries double the firepower (nor did I claim KA52 was better), no need to repeat it.
vodkasvictim 2 years ago
Chinook is used for cargo, the Blackhawk and versions of it are used for medevac.
DrMotorDude 2 years ago
Chinook is occasionally used for medivac, I saw a program where the Brits medivacced a guy in one.
Hinds faster than Blackhawk though - I reckon It'd do a better job. Little bird would probably be best of all.
vodkasvictim 2 years ago
Bro the British Apaches are owned and made by the British, Only the body is similar. Hell the rotors fold so it can be made shipborne, the KA-52 is good too, but learn our resources before you spit bullshit, also they have no problems with their hell fires.
scarface8999 2 years ago
Why would they have changed the design so theres a defect there? If it aint broke, don't try to change it.
And why does everyone bring up KA52? It's Hind I keep saying beats apache - AND KA52.
vodkasvictim 2 years ago
this video looks like it was made in the mid 1990s. imagine what these choppers are like now...
MVX12 3 years ago
the new version the longbow is so fucking amazeing
12jason223 3 years ago
the 1 that jus came out even better lol
elliotts4 2 years ago
Holy Shit. That is fucking amazing. I wanna pilot that!
montreal961 3 years ago
hahaha, McDonnell, McDonald's?
McDonald's apache!
Pyrofries 3 years ago
Oh, shit, what is this?
Flying Trucks?
Vihor189 3 years ago
McDonnel Douglas huh? Hmmm, maybe you should do some research. The Apache is a Boeing product.
ApacheArmament69 3 years ago
Just an old movie. McDonnell bought Douglas, becoming McDonnell Douglas. MD then bought Hughes, so the Hughes AH64 Apache became the McDonell Douglas AH64 Apache. Then this film was made. Boeing then bought McDonnell Douglas and the Apache became the Boeing A64 Apache. Simple as that.
Vermiliontea 3 years ago
Boeing "bought" McDonnell Douglas the same way Lockheed "bought" Martin Marietta. That is, they merged.
radio187 3 years ago
boeing now owns MCD Douglas
login001login001 3 years ago
it was made by both companies
Nuckolls39 3 years ago
I heard Mcdonnel but w/e dork. Hellfires own.
Dariusblaze 3 years ago
hunter of tank
malperk 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Magnetic Gun technology;;;Can a chain of bullets be magnetically enhanced to become magnetically charged with a small amount of negative electro charge. If the chain of bullets had a non friction magnet force, less vibration and could be faster through the gun and gun be a magnetic gun also.
humexavier 3 years ago
what the hellare you talking about?
Appclypse 3 years ago
lol
spearkill 4 years ago
It's called the "McDonnell" Douglas AH-64 Apache, not "McDonald" Douglas Apache AH-64. I don't think they come in Happy Meals
croat88 4 years ago
indeed, hahahah laughing my ass off !! Yes I would like an Apache AH-64 with my Happy Meal please, and a extra hamburger
Sander89Falcon 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You 2 best shut the f*ck up coz I actually own an apache & i'll blow up your fat mums with my hell fire missiles! Then i'll tie you to the rotors and spin you round real fast until your sick & your own sick smacks you in the face at 300 mph, YEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAGGGGHHHH DOG! Then i'll jam 1 of the still attached missiles right up your ass before shooting you at your dads HEHEHEHEHEHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!
maximus2908 4 years ago
yeah right, you expect people to believe that?
LunarisDeathtiger 4 years ago
You're more batshit insane than those 2.5 inch area attack rockets at 2:06.
Pewpewlas3rgun 3 years ago 2
If u read the start u would see it says "McDonnell" and if u actually listen properly you will hear him say "McDonnell" aswell.
Speedyw00t 4 years ago
I meant in GrimlockUK's video comment section
croat88 4 years ago
russian Ka-50 is better
Konvarion 4 years ago
biased much?
LunarisDeathtiger 4 years ago
LOS PIZDES I PROVOKACIJA!!!
blacksharkka50 4 years ago
beauty machine
mikael666mikael 4 years ago
'cock'pit!
illidanwashere772 4 years ago
Throw a six foot logging chain into its rotars and see how invulnerable it is!
hoteldriver 4 years ago
How many guys go in there?
swanseaboy 4 years ago
could be nice in Vietnam
zolozan 4 years ago
Several of these brought down by IEA in Iraq with not very specializzed weapon
Helicopter is helicopter
zolozan 4 years ago
30 million dollars I would imagine?
Living2talk 4 years ago
The baddest of the bad!!!!
princeofdarcy 4 years ago
Yes toogij, The Apache can do "a looping" but it wasnt meant for that so it can be really hard on the rotor system, especially if not performed correctly. They can also do a roll. Rolls if performed correctly are done at 1g the whole way around.....The US Army trains Egyptian to fly their aircraft. So the argument earlier makes no sense.
mattAH64 4 years ago
In theory all helicopters can it all depends on the pilot...but who cares. That isn't what they are for.
morrielarsen 4 years ago
can it perform a looping?
Toogij 4 years ago
yes
Scorpac 4 years ago
That is some powerful weapon man. Must be like riding a damn Dragon. It's amazing how powerful machines men can build.
endercross 4 years ago
Imagine what we could do if we paid that kind of attention to detail to ourselves, our societies and peace. I hope I'm not the only person who is alarmed by this piece of shit video. The calmness and salesman like demeanor of the narrator is particularly disturbing. I'm sure he would also achieve excellent sales figures in marketing for landmines and childrens handcuffs.
I hope it gets better than this.
TherealGwaihir 4 years ago
What's wrong with landmines?
The problems were never the weapons, but the people who had them.
KillaHaakon 4 years ago
Right. It's all the bad guy's fault. Nothing to do with us at all.
What was I thinking. Enough of that, time to go watch CNN.
Does anybody know any good landmine company stocks?
TherealGwaihir 4 years ago
Seriously there isn't. They are very good and cost effective area denial weapons, which will force the enemy to either spend large amount of resources to get through or to get forced into an alternate approach.
There's a fucking huge difference between the massive minefield at the Finnish-Russian borders and in the playground in Bosnia-Hercegovina, and you know it.
KillaHaakon 4 years ago
That means both of these things are INDIVIDUALISTIC and cannot be compared with others who have had different upbringings. Therefore, before you go running your mouth off about things you have hardly considered, take a few seconds, and THINK...unlike your country which tends to ACT before THINKING. It might get you somewhere.
p.s. you are technically right about US work ethics..I mean you are the most overworked and underpaid First World Nations on the planet. Kudos!
mooonfire 4 years ago
hey moonfire i couldnt help but notice your post wow all that education,politics,cultural anthropology,global econmics,u really no how to put people in their place,so why you got all those videos on your profile of people and KIDS in diapers? do you have a diaper fetish or what?
collardgreeneatinsob 4 years ago
moonfire im one of those overworked americans youre putting down,i dont have a lot of education and have been called a banjo playin inbred mongoloid but my american ass can shoo 1/2" groups at 200 yards.and i jus fukin luv foreigners that put my country down
collardgreeneatinsob 4 years ago
and my idividualistic bullet cost is less than 20 cents per round so pull out your slide rule and tell me how much money does it take to turn a motherfuckers LIGHTS OUT? (regardless of individualistic nationality)
collardgreeneatinsob 4 years ago
moonboy you really should be nicer to people man bragging about all that education, puttin us down, using them BIG wordsbut above all else PLEASE get help for that diaper fetish man its one thing to be alittle kinky but watching people pee in diapers is just SICK
collardgreeneatinsob 4 years ago
collardgreeneatinsob, is that Egyptian sweating you? Forget about it, the U.K.'s got your back. See response to him down the page. He isn't as smart as he thinks. He also failed to mention how HIS government readily accepts terrorist suspects from the USA and EU and tortures them for us, because our society objects to torture, but his think it is perfectly okay. As long as the CIA pays them...
thinkingispointless 4 years ago
It shows exactly where your government has its priorities and it certainly isn't on its own people. By the way, I have taken several years of Cultural Anthropology at the University level and I know global economy and politics like the back of my hand. Intelligence in war...I call it machismo. Who's got the biggest and best machine!?! By the way, intelligence and work ethic are LEARNED...they are not natural..you are NEVER born with them.
mooonfire 4 years ago
When your military budget is 132.8 Billion dollars US (2007), you can afford to make ridiculous machines of war. KlubMarcus, it is hilarious that you mention that the people of the US are more hardworking and smarter than the "muslim terrorists" when you consider that the US government spends a mere 67.2 billion dollars educating its own people. Compare that to Israel, whose budget has practically equivalent figures for both defense and education. Isn't that impressive?
mooonfire 4 years ago
Moonfire, what your little essay failed to say though is that EGYPT (your country) spends 3.4% of its GDP on defence, while America spends 4.06%. Sounds like both governments put similar importance on defence spending to me. What about education? Egypt has a literacy rate of 71.4% while the USA has 99%. Who's the asshole? Oh yeah, that would be YOU.
thinkingispointless 4 years ago
Background music reminds me of Airwolf
zombat 4 years ago
I guess that muslim terrorists are just jealous that they aren't smart enough or hard-working enough to actual design, build, and deploy an Apache. Allied Arab militaries have to buy the Apache from America.
KlubMarcus 4 years ago
Check out "The AH-64 at work"
jaydot69 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This Helicopter Kill people in iraq...
This Helicopter Kill people in iraq...
This Helicopter Kill people in iraq...
This Helicopter Kill people in iraq...
nourlines 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your mom sucks my dick...
your mom sucks my dick...
your mom sucks my dick...
your mom sucks my dick...
aolyahoo 4 years ago
my mom chokes on small bones
Prey2006 4 years ago
oh really..... what do you think it was designed to do ? :S
Doowoo 4 years ago
When you see this thing coming other than in the United States, you better start running before it finds you.
redmustang03 4 years ago 2
What a great machine. You can kill everything faster than before! Just what we needed!
Viiltaja 4 years ago
Killing murderous thugs like Nazis, communist aggressors, and terrorists is a good thing.
spacecowboynj 4 years ago
LOL commie nazi aggressors put down the crack pipe
lacokanostramusic 4 years ago
hi on the bit about the chain gun isnt the rpm 4200 isnt it not 600????? as it says in here 1200 for 2 minutes sustained fire?
clsteele 4 years ago
The chain gun doesn't rotate. Single barrel. Yup, 625 + or - 25 rounds a minute.
HYOUNGE 4 years ago
doesnt it i thought it did? or is it only the rotary canon that does?
clsteele 4 years ago
Nope. The multi-barreled ones rotate.
HYOUNGE 4 years ago
oooh ok
clsteele 4 years ago
Ehrm..Mcdonald douglas?....
gtaraya 4 years ago
Yea, originally built by Hughes, bought out by McDonnell Douglas, bought out by Boeing. The anti torgue pedals had the Hughes logo molded into them, I wonder if the "D" models today still do today?
HYOUNGE 4 years ago
yeah,i know that but "McDonald" Douglas?hehehe...look at the description...lil bit of typpo...
gtaraya 4 years ago
Ah, I see it there.
HYOUNGE 4 years ago
no prob,and tnx for the info though...
gtaraya 4 years ago
plus one
morrielarsen 4 years ago
wat are those two things near the top? they look like guns..are they?
hunterv555 4 years ago
You're probably looking at the engine's nose gear boxes mounted in front of the engines. The hole in the front is to allow airflow in and around the gear box to aid cooling.
HYOUNGE 4 years ago
ooh ok now i see thnx
hunterv555 4 years ago
those are the jet intakes.
fusionstar916 4 years ago
So glad i'm out of all that and just design T-shirts now.Apache's awesome but the A-10's the one i fear.Want awesome military t's,Apache helicopter T-shirts? You do then vsit Bignumptees Military Madhouse and take a butchers at the cool designs
HOMERBIGNUMPT 4 years ago
awesome helicopter, the best there is.
Jamestown28 4 years ago
In the world of militant Islam, the Apache has been referred to numerous times as the "Angel of Death." Now, an arms dealer knows he's done his job when a weapon he made gets a nickname like that.
Krelus 4 years ago
we (the brits) army air corps with AH64 (D) longbow call it "flying in the weeds"
Joe1r5 4 years ago
Apache .. shit ??? lol | It´s awsome .. Ka-52 is much more worser
Hostingrovis 5 years ago
Apache apache apache what a shit why american didn`t have a russian helicopter like Ka-52 ....
because the american ar so stupid to see this
router456 5 years ago
The KA-52 doesn't even have a turreted cannon. It's also a disaster in foreign military sales. So obviously, when it's time to decide wether or not to buy Russian junk or American firepower, they buy American.
KlubMarcus 5 years ago
Well they could, and did, easily fix the turreted cannon problem. I think the Ka would be good in certain situations, such as situations where there might be more air resistence. Maybe the US shoudl buy a few for situations liek that. But mostly i tihnk the US relies on its air force to handle things like that.
idlenessss 4 years ago
Still an incredible machine after all these years! My fav after the KA-50.
flyby321 5 years ago
Interesting :)
eddy2495 5 years ago
"Map of the earth flight profile" old attempt to highlight GPS capabilities w/o giving anything away? Sounds that way.
Protean213 5 years ago
"Nap of the earth", meaning ground-hugging low altitude flight, Not "Map of the earth" :P
Hairysteed 4 years ago
It is "nape"
XGCScrappy 4 years ago
We in the U.S. Army call this type of flying NOE or Nap of the Earth. I also call it "Wow, I get paid for this?!!!!"
RangerGhost 4 years ago
And logging "Z" time. Zookin!
HYOUNGE 4 years ago
ahahaha no... silly boy.. hes saying "nap of the earth profile". By this he means that the Apaches frame is suited to flying at low altitudes while sticking to geographical land forms and trees for cover so that it can lauch surprise attack on tanks and avoid radar contact...
like Hairysteed said.
mattbelshaw 4 years ago