I agree that this isn't one of Tiempo's better performances BUT if you want to hear him at his best listen to his own arr. where he combines the Revolutionary Etude with the Etude in Thirds playing both simultaneously. A real tour de force.
Another great reading is his video of the Bbm Chopin Prelude - Op. 28 #16 Excellent.
Tiempo's tempos are very fast. [What an excruciating pun]!! They work well in the beginning but are on the brink of unravelling towards the end!! Mind you -- I wouldn't mind being able to play this piece at that speed -- or at all!! NB: Liszt himself favoured a "controlled" performance.
For what it's worth, this is noticeably faster than any of the dozen or so recordings of this piece by famous people that I have heard. (Barere was the second fastest.) But it's also noticeably sloppier and Cziffra is more musically interesting. Tiempo has better recordings. Check his website.
So sorry but the best performance of this piece is by Murray Perahia.Mister tiempo is on the way to be a circusartist.A spitting image of his teacher La Argerich.What a ridiculous and pretentious performance.
He knows Martha Argerich and has worked with her, but isn't at her level technically or musically. That being said, he isn't as horrible as you make him out to be and the implication that Martha is ever ridiculous or pretentious or otherwise circuslike is unbelievable. She is truly on of the top five pianists of the last 50 years.
yeah, no, Cziffra's is way better than this. Tiempo's sound doesn't come close to Cziffra's, and he doesn't play with anywhere near the bravura and abandon. This is not even in the same league, i'm afraid
For Gnomeregan!
parmsib 2 months ago in playlist Fler videoklipp från dafuckinmart
Mixing the salad again, Tiempo?
123mazeppa 10 months ago 4
very orginaal and with great speed
crackapolo 2 years ago 4
Cziffra owns this for me and I have a hard time listening to anything else afterwards haha.
KeithWhalen11 2 years ago
earl wild
anonymousQ45 2 years ago
There are little micro-hesitations, but this is still a brilliant performance.
demosj 2 years ago
Great in parts, but needs to work out some of the kinks.
Phi1618033 2 years ago 3
Very fast indeed, but at numerous places also very unmusical and seemingly out of control of dynamics.
oldvlad955 3 years ago 3
Hasty,uncuntrolled,sloppy&superficial. Sounds like a plastic piano!
NOSEhow2LIV 3 years ago
very good facilities but it was more like "Rushed Dance of the Gnomes". Still, he's very good and his etudes were great.
opus43rhap 3 years ago 6
I agree that this isn't one of Tiempo's better performances BUT if you want to hear him at his best listen to his own arr. where he combines the Revolutionary Etude with the Etude in Thirds playing both simultaneously. A real tour de force.
Another great reading is his video of the Bbm Chopin Prelude - Op. 28 #16 Excellent.
musicformillions 3 years ago 3
Some parts may even be slightly faster than Cziffra's, but Cziff's has more overall control and therefore bite.
Grigor99 3 years ago 2
its actually bad, hes all over the place and there is very little directions or musical line.
brahmsian1steve 3 years ago
adam gyorgy plays it better
brahmsian1steve 3 years ago 3
Tiempo's tempos are very fast. [What an excruciating pun]!! They work well in the beginning but are on the brink of unravelling towards the end!! Mind you -- I wouldn't mind being able to play this piece at that speed -- or at all!! NB: Liszt himself favoured a "controlled" performance.
gerardbedecarter 3 years ago
almost the same speed as cziffra but certainly less feeling.
gielah 3 years ago
For what it's worth, this is noticeably faster than any of the dozen or so recordings of this piece by famous people that I have heard. (Barere was the second fastest.) But it's also noticeably sloppier and Cziffra is more musically interesting. Tiempo has better recordings. Check his website.
whatsmylogin 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I dont really like this piece.
BachFong11 4 years ago
music? where is it?...
victorjara23 4 years ago
So sorry but the best performance of this piece is by Murray Perahia.Mister tiempo is on the way to be a circusartist.A spitting image of his teacher La Argerich.What a ridiculous and pretentious performance.
lipattihaskill 4 years ago
haha nice comment
faustsaccomplice 4 years ago
He knows Martha Argerich and has worked with her, but isn't at her level technically or musically. That being said, he isn't as horrible as you make him out to be and the implication that Martha is ever ridiculous or pretentious or otherwise circuslike is unbelievable. She is truly on of the top five pianists of the last 50 years.
3cplantin 4 years ago
Fast interpretation, but Arrau´s and Cziffra´s interpretation remain the best
nico22059 4 years ago 6
As far as Cziffra is concerned, I agree
dave231000 4 years ago
Hey Cziffra was a legend...give others a chance...
westt1234 4 years ago 2
the acoustic of the piano/recording is a bit out of place, i wish it was better...
vivacelife 4 years ago
i really prefer cziffras version
jackewiebohne 4 years ago
yeah, Cziffra is weigh out of this guys league. No match, sure, this guy plays fast, but no musical interpretation.
michaelkid13 4 years ago
Well said tristano1987! Nowhere near Cziffra's superlative performance!!
sonnym1 4 years ago
yeah, no, Cziffra's is way better than this. Tiempo's sound doesn't come close to Cziffra's, and he doesn't play with anywhere near the bravura and abandon. This is not even in the same league, i'm afraid
tristano1987 4 years ago
he is very big pianist and very handsom=)
pianisamet 4 years ago
Rivals and even surpasses the performance of Cziffra.
shilloshillos 4 years ago
You are out of your mind!
lipattihaskill 4 years ago
Why, because Cziffra's is faster? (or is it?... or is that the point at all?)
shilloshillos 4 years ago
whoa... even better than his chopin arrangement...
tompilk 5 years ago