Added: 2 years ago
From: NWFblogs
Views: 4,789
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'll believe the opinions of religious zealots over climatologists on the subject of climate ANYDAY.

    Fear of God > All Reason and Knowledge

  • @o0xemas0o POE

  • ach! I hate how these stupid teabaggers make us Christians look like rednecked idiots.

  • This guy is the face of the American Taliban and opposes all scientific evidence. Another teabagging nutjob driving this country (and planet) to ruin.

  • With the human body at rest ,we exhale 57000ppm per 500ml ,of co2. fact

    mouth to mouth resuscitation, exhaling into anothers mouth is a life saving procedure not attempted murder by excessive co2 poisoning.

    Every drop of EARTHS co2 amounts to less than 0.04% of the atmosphere. FACT

    99% of the atmosphere is water vapour (Clouds ? rain?)

    photosynthesis <--- plants eat co2 FACT!

    humans,animals,insects,volcano­s,trains planes,tanks , war,beer, factorys and more , all produce co2.

    its risen by 0.009%

  • What an idiot. Plant food? LOL LOL LOL LOL

  • @hrysivjt67 plants require CO2 as an essential ingredient in Photosynthesis. So yes it is plant food and basic elementary science.

  • sorry to disappoint you becky and kingeth james , but Monckton is a arrogant , aristocratic stooge for big oil and coal interests. Get a clue!

  • He knows his stuff, get behind him America, your great country deserves much more.

  • Lord Monckton is one out of very few people who actually speak the truth. I respect him.

  • @christo930 yep

  • I listened to this man speak last night, and he was absolutly spot on in all regaurds. I was very pleased, and I am EXTREMELY uspet over the tone of John Shimkus, as long ago I have stopped refering to CO2 as CO2. It is now PF to me, plant food. Rep. Shimkus can kiss my merry arse on his way to political suicide once the scientists finally are able to break through all the politicians and get the REAL inconvinient truths out there without being cencored

  • @KingethJames

    Shimkus was on the same team as Monckton. Since your listening comprehension is apparently quite low, I guess I'll forgive you for having a completely backwards view of science as well.

    Scientists have said for a decade that humans are causing global warming. It's politicians like Monckton, Shimkus, and Inhofe that they need to break through.

  • @RichardMNixon Thank you for replying to a comment that I forgot I made over a year ago, on a video I don't remember watching. I didn't like shimkus because he sounds really annoying and didn't seem to handle his questioning professionally.

    Most people who research start with two premises; that CO2 has gone up in the atmosphere, and that the temperature has also gone up. Naturally, they conclude these are related, which is marginally true.

    I think I pulled an allnighter before that comment

  • The left has been playing this clip and only this portion of Lord Monckton's testimony because the idea of CO2 being plant food sounds funny to them. The fact is Green Houses often burn methane to increase the CO2 levels in order to produce better results. You won't see the MSM reporting this.

  • It sickens me to give the video I just watched a 5-star "awesome" rating, but people need to see this.

  • Because the earth is colling not getting hotter. whne you say Global Climate Change. you get a free pass at anything, Hot, Cold, Wet, Dry, Windy anything get to be caused by GCC.

  • Why is it no longer called "Global Warming", but "Climate Change"?

  • The planet continues to warm globally, on a climatic scale (the averages of all individual weather zones). In this sense Global Warming is technically correct. However, the worrying aspect is really the increasingly extreme weather trends (more flooding, drought, tropical storms due to warmer waters, forest fires). In this sense, the entire climate is slowly being altered

  • re: AdreasFrancis

    Because they are two separate terms.

    Global Warming refers to increasing radiative forcing.

    (The amount of heat in the world is going up)

    greyfalcon. net/ forcing3.png

    Where as Climate change is the result of Global Warming. (A destabilization of persistent climate patterns)

    The large misconception about all this though is that the heat is not spread uniformly across the world. It instead sloshes around.

    Also 2008, you have to consider the La Nina.

    greyfalcon. net/ lanina

  • Man,with all the C02 Venus has,it should be a bountiful planet teaming with plant life!...oh wait....its a lifeless hot house with no life. The whole C02 is plant food argument is the dumbest one ever.

  • Yeah, except that it is getting colder again. Reason Al Gore recently said it's really starting to hurry with the carbon tax is probably to implement it in time to attribute the colder weather to the carbon credits HIS firm is trading. Also, Gores Nashville mansion used in one month more than twice the electricity the typical American household uses in a year! And increased since he released An Inconvenient Truth.

  • No body cares about Al Gore unless they are an idiot. I hate people making arguments about Al Gore as if what he says or does has any influence on what the science says. If you don't like him,then fine,i don't either,but you're arguing against a person,not the facts. Its like saying "Gravity is a bunch of rubbish because George Bush believes in it". It's science,not a political issue and people need to stop arguing it as such because it shows how big of an idiot they are.

  • It's more like saying, "the bail-outs is a bunch of rubish because Bush advocates them so strongly."

    It is very much political. This winter we've had the most snow we've had in 20 years. Climate is changing constantly. Scientists from both sides have arguments that sounds valid, but not both can be right, so clearly there's a political motivation. Oil companies are sailing up as the suppliers of Hyrogen fuel, so who benefit from funding the "deniers"?

  • well passing carbon taxes and eating up loads of dollars by promoting alarmism certainly has benefits.

  • By the same argument man must be causing the martian ice caps to melt?

    Venus is much closer to the big burning ball of gas we call the SUN. Therefore no matter what it's atmospheric makeup it will be hotter than all hell.

    If we were to swap earths position and venus's within the solar system we'd all be dead quickly due to the sweltering merciless sun

  • @GodOfPlague Venus is so hot because of its atmosphere, which causes a runaway greenhouse effect. With a nitrogen-oxygen atmosphere like Earth's, Venus would be quite similar to earth. Significantly hotter, but habitable, and not the pressure cooker it is right now. The bigger issue is its extremely slow rotation though.

  • Oxygen is vital to human life too, oddly too much oxygen will kill you, funny huh?

    Water too, is vital for humans to live, but if you drink too much you will die, and not from drowning. You seriously can drink yourself to death with water.

  • Yes but that idea completely goes against his excluded middle argument. Remember to a Republican and especially to a fundementalist like this guy there is no happy middle point only sensationalized extremes, it's either hard left or hard right, Good or Evil, no control on enviromental damage or totalitarian control forbidding breathing since that causes carbon. It's easy to make your opinion sound logical when you represent all opposition as radical extremists.

  • MONKTON is a JOKE

    that republican is a JOKE too

    what they're saying is just ridiculous!

  • Maybe we can make it such that only liberals and alarmist nuts cannot exhale, hey I got it, lets super glue their mouths and noses shut.

    I say to the alarmist, prove it or shut up, you are beginning to look really stupid.

  • Amen. I left the "church" when I found that Gore and the others have heaps to benefit personally from promoting Global warming and implementing a Global Carbon Tax. The scientists speaking up against the hysteria has some very good points, so now I want real proof from the Doom-sayers. Or they can come up with a new form of energy that is clean and available for everyone, not a Carbon-Taxed World of scarcity.

  • basic 5th grade science here mate

    Humans inhale Oxygen for respiration and exhale Carbon dioxide as a bi product.

    Plants respiration is opposite they use carbon dioxide and emit Oxygen. It's why air did not run out millions of years ago.

    It's like locking people in an air tight safe.

    The less O2 you pump into that safe the less people that enviroment will support the more oxegyn you pump in the more people you can support in that enviroment. It's common sense.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more