How to explain such difference with real results of real racers on real circuits? A complicated question. Probably, the matter is that F1 2002 for PS2 is not a simulator. Or you should contact Ferrari - probably they in vain pay Raikkonen $51'000'000 a year ;)))
GTR2 is FAR more realistic than F1 06
SNAKEiSM 4 years ago
i no about tht, i no
more about f1 thn you
jackwilson14 4 years ago
I don't care :)))
MikeMouseRU 4 years ago
i got a 12.334 with eddie irvine in jag for ps2 in f1 2002 so explain tht??
jackwilson14 4 years ago
How to explain such difference with real results of real racers on real circuits? A complicated question. Probably, the matter is that F1 2002 for PS2 is not a simulator. Or you should contact Ferrari - probably they in vain pay Raikkonen $51'000'000 a year ;)))
MikeMouseRU 4 years ago
Not bad but 1:10.567 with kimi raikonneon (or wot ever hes called) is good on F1 06 for ps2 is better
jackwilson14 4 years ago
The best time for a track in a configuration of 2002 - 1:16.676 (Juan Pablo Montoya in qualification) :)))
MikeMouseRU 4 years ago
try rFactor for F1 simulation
daljeet001 4 years ago
1) ISI does not sell it in Russia :(
2) IMHO, GTR2 more advanced game :)
MikeMouseRU 4 years ago
ISI does sell it in russia
daljeet001 4 years ago