YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

there is a lot of disinformation out there on 911. if something looks like nonsense but appears next to compelling information you know ure looking at misinfo or disinfo. There are entire sites that sound technical but are really meant to make people think 911 truth is nonsense. with domains that almost match real 911t sites.

Buildings do not fall through themselves. The N tower was hit 10-15 floors from the roof. You can see the explosives in some clips:

gravity>>? watch?v=9nc5_5IJek8

zoskiaist 1 year ago

This video is posted 3 years ago.

YouTube says that it only has:

6 ratings, 4,968 views and 16 comments?

REALLY?

That is:

- 1 rating every 6 months

- 1 view every 6 hours and 23 minutes

- 1 comment every 82 days

REALLY!?

I just favorite and rated it 5* - how many ratings does it have now?

tuzmor 2 years ago

When the History Channel showed the Documentaries, A fireman said he heard the building buckle and creak. I believe the jet fuel and high intense heat did cause it to collapse. I don't believe in any conspiracy. How do you know that some these intense sparks or something that looked like detonation wasn't electricity.

SuesDaytona 2 years ago

I started to think about this a lot last night. Could it if there was detonation, Bombs were planted by someone who were the terrorist ahead time, To make sure both of the buildings came down and maybe others. Because if you think about it, they failed the first time to bring it down what was it 1993?

SuesDaytona 2 years ago

@SuesDaytona

unfortunately there is a mountain of highly compelling evidence that makes the explosives hypothesis an inescapable conclusion.

a few are; The speed & symmetry of all 3 tower destructions (1.2&7), wtc7's freefall implosion, the level of destruction to the towers, (pulverized concrete, 1100 people unaccounted for, complete destruction of the massive 47 core columns (from gravity??) 99 days fires that would not go out. the squibs, testimony of witnesses hearing explosives..

zoskiaist 1 year ago

snap crackle pop ... that baby was cooking off like a string of black cat fire crackers all the way down turning the main support colum into dust Heeeheee..pecker head bush cock suckin bastards... you are retards

westerling69 5 years ago

The majority of the jet fuel burned off durring the crash. And the speed of the implosion seems very quick. I cant explain that. The collapse looks like a hot knife spliting down soft butter.

RichardBrennekeC 5 years ago

let me get this straight... massive slabs of steel and concrete slamming together one after another - is this supposed to happen gently, without dust and debris shooting out from between floors as they get squeezed together? of course it would look "explosive." skycrapers aren't made of plastic. I'M SICK OF THESE CONSPIRACY THEORY IDIOTS, THEY'RE ALL SEVERLY RETARDED

educationalvideos 5 years ago 2

i'm just trying to show people that the planes didn't take the WTC's down but the bombs did and when they see maybe it will get em to start thinking watch these video's or at least the 1st two

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XL4isaZRapY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saICe3domSE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrCWLpRc1yM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnVIogawlmk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oi3-pojxD4

nickv11763 5 years ago

You are an uneducated MORON - You have no concept of Physics - you have NO Credibility because you have a Severe LACK of INTELLIGENCE and therefore your point of view is WORTHLESS - You are a Total ASSHOLE and a Complete INSULT to all Intelligent people on earth. We have NO INTEREST in your WORTHLESS Opinion !!!

gfemg 2 years ago

hmmm jeff king who teaches from M.I.T must know nothing either because he seems to think the same but he wouldn't know anything would he, he just teaches on the subject of building structure before you start making fun of people do some research because now you have no ground to stand on look him up on youtube also look up the melting point of steel and see that jet feul only burns at half the temp. soo why was there melting steel weeks later

nickv11763 2 years ago

um...you're thinking the massive amounts of dust and chunks of debris just simply materialize and the floors stay the way they are? I'm sorry but you're assuming the energy that which pulverized and ejected these floors still allows for the floors to be intact and crush the floors below....apparently you haven't thought too hard about what you just said. these buildings were being shredded and ejected from the top down...there was nothing left to crush the rest of the building.

Thrashaero 5 years ago

quite simply, if this had been a controlled demolition, you would have seen explosions at many points in the building not just the part that was coming down. If you watch a controlled demolition, you see charges flash at key points in the structure. It takes miles of cable and strategic cutting of key support beams. Impossible to set up an operation like this in a fully functioning skyscraper.

tchrastka 5 years ago

i'm just trying to show people that the planes didn't take the WTC's down but the bombs did and when they see maybe it will get em to start thinking watch these video's or at least the 1st two

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XL4isaZRapY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saICe3domSE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrCWLpRc1yM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnVIogawlmk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oi3-pojxD4

nickv11763 5 years ago

um well you're assuming they used conventional demolition, which would be useless. they could have just as easily applied radio detonation and program the sequence at the transmitter console on the fly to start where the plane hit (as would null the use of using a cabled demolition system). also there were several squibs visible from multiple angles occurring at regular intervals and distances below the collapse zone.

Thrashaero 5 years ago

http://www.link4u.com/candle.htm

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc2_floor78.html

tellthetruth 5 years ago

The structure imploded at its weakened section, causing the above floors to come crashing down on the rest of the building in a pancake-like effect.

And no, I don't see "demolition waves."

SCReuter 5 years ago

i'm just trying to show people that the planes didn't take the WTC's down but the bombs did and when they see maybe it will get em to start thinking watch these video's or at least the 1st two

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XL4isaZRapY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saICe3domSE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnVIogawlmk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oi3-pojxD4

nickv11763 5 years ago

if it hadn't been a demolition the colapse wouldn't have been near perfectly vertical. the side of the impact would have collapsed first and the collapse would not have been completely symetrical from top to bottom

Misanthrope0607 5 years ago

Link to this comment:

All Comments (19)